老礦眷幼兒園的階級文化分析--批判教育學觀點 - 政大學術集成

(1)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

—

(2)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

—

(3)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

(4)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

! II!

(5)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

!

The Class Culture Analysis of Old Kindergartens in the Disadvantage Community

– Viewpoint of Critical Pedagogy

Abstract

From the perspective of the second generation manager of kindergarten, this study, with the kindergarten operated by the researcher family’s in a disadvantage community, explores methods to eliminate the class difference through education, and relationship between curriculum model and class cultures based on the viewpoint of critical pedagogy.

Critical pedagogy investigates the oppression of the lower class students through education in the capitalist system. Furthermore, it advocates eliminating class differences and highlighting the value of humanity through awareness and transformation of education. Echoing this concept, in recent years, the field of early childhood education in Taiwan begins to implement play-based integrated curriculum model under the guidance of preschools integration policy, and claims that learning can become more significance from student’s perspective. However, such policy does not work well. Early childhood education in Taiwan is mainly private kindergartens. Under the intense competition, most kindergartens have to respond to the demands of parents to advocate reading, writing, counting, implementing teaching mode preparing for entry into primary school. Therefore, the sudden implementation of integrated curriculum gets resistance from teachers, parents and students. The researcher clarifies reasons of the resistance by observation in kindergarten for many years, interviews with parents and teachers, quoted from critical pedagogy such as concepts of conscious and liberation by Paulo Freire and transformative intellectuals by Henry Giroux, to realize the consensus with teachers to help them understand their position in society and further change their teaching methods.

(6)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

!

! IV!

After build-up the preliminary consensus with teachers in kindergarten, the researcher make transformation expanded into parents. The study expects to reach the purpose of curriculum reform and eliminate class difference through the radical approach.

Keywords: class culture, curriculum reform, critical pedagogy

(7)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

(8)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

! 2!

(9)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

………

(10)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

! 4!

………

(11)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1! Bourdieu Bourdieu,!

1998 !

(12)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

! 6!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2! !

3!

!

(13)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

121

(14)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

! 8!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5!

!

(15)

‧

國

立政治大學

‧

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

6! 85 !

(16)

! 10!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

122

(17)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

10!

!

13! !

14! Freire,!P 2006 baking!education !

(18)

! 12!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

15! !

(19)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

16! Bourdieu Bernstein

!

17!

!

(20)

! 14!

(21)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

18! James!C.!Scott hidden!transcript offstage

public!speech Scott,!1990 !

(22)

! 16!

!

(23)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1!

(24)

! 18!

(25)

(26)

! 20!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2!

2000 !

3!

2000 !

(27)

(28)

! 22!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(29)

(30)

! 24!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5! Freire 1995 !

(31)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

6! 2003 !

(32)

! 26!

(33)

(34)

! 28!

(35)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1!

!

2! !

3! !

4!

2! !

(36)

! 30!

(37)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

3! !

4!

!

(38)

! 32!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5!

!

(39)

(40)

! 34!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

6!

!

(41)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

7!

(42)

! 36!

(43)

(44)

! 38!

(45)

(46)

! 40!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

8! Foucault Bentham

Foucault,!1977 !

9! — ECERS>R 5

!

(47)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

10 !

(48)

! 42!

(49)

(50)

! 44!

(51)

(52)

! 46!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

12!

!

(53)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

13!

!

(54)

! 48!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

14! banking

Freire !

(55)

(56)

! 50!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

15! !

(57)

(58)

! 52!

(59)

(60)

! 54!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

16! !

(61)

……

(62)

! 56!

—

(63)

(64)

! 58!

—

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

17

(65)

(66)

! 60!

(67)

—

(68)

! 62!

(69)

(70)

! 64!

—

(71)

……

—

……

(72)

! 66!

—

……

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1! !

(73)

……

—

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2! !

3! Terry

Terry

!

(74)

! 68!

……

—

(75)

……

(76)

! 70!

……

(77)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

4! !

(78)

! 72!

—

(79)

(80)

! 74!

(81)

(82)

! 76!

(83)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1! !

(84)

! 78!

—

(85)

(86)

! 80!

—

(87)

(88)

! 82!

(89)

—

(90)

! 84!

(91)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1!

15000

!

(92)

! 86!

(93)

(94)

! 88!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2! Peter!Senge 2006

!

(95)

—

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

3! !

(96)

! 90!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

4! 4 !

(97)

(98)

! 92!

(99)

—

(100)

! 94!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(101)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

6!

!

7! 18

!

(102)

! 96!

(103)

—

(104)

! 98!

(105)

—

(106)

! 100!

—

6419

(107)

(108)

! 102!

—

(109)

(110)

! 104!

(111)

(112)

! 106!

(113)

(114)

! 108!

(115)

—

(116)

! 110!

(117)

(118)

! 112!

(119)

(120)

! 114!

(121)

(122)

! 116!

(123)

—

(124)

! 118!

(125)

!

(126)

! 120!

!

’

(127)

!