• 沒有找到結果。

Factors related to hysterectomy in women with physical and mobility disabilities

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Factors related to hysterectomy in women with physical and mobility disabilities"

Copied!
6
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Factors related to hysterectomy in women with physical and mobility disabilities

Lan-Ping Lin

a

, Molly Hsieh

b

, Si-Fan Chen

a

, Chia-Ling Wu

c

, Shang-Wei Hsu

d,e,1

, Jin-Ding Lin

a,c,1,

*

aSchoolofPublicHealth,NationalDefenseMedicalCenter,161,Min-ChunERd,Sec.6,Nei-Hu,Taipei,Taiwan

bCenterforGeneralEducation,NationalDefenseMedicalCenter,Taipei,Taiwan

cResearchCenterforIntellectualDisabilitiesTaiwan,Chung-HuaFoundationforPersonswithIntellectualDisabilities,NewTaipeiCity,Taiwan

dGraduateInstituteofHealthcareAdministration,AsiaUniversity,Taichung,Taiwan

eDepartmentofPublicHealth,ChinaMedicalUniversity,Taichung,Taiwan

1. Introduction

Hysterectomyisasurgicalproceduretoremovetheuterinebody(i.e.,partialhysterectomy)ortheuterinebodyand cervix(i.e.,totalhysterectomy)(NationalCancerInstitute,2010).Hysterectomiesarethesecondmostcommontypeof majorsurgeryperformedonwomenofchildbearingage.Hysterectomymaybeconductedtotreatmanyconditionsthat affecttheuterus,suchasuterinefibroids,endometriosis,pelvicsupportproblems,abnormaluterinebleeding,cancerand chronicpelvicpain(TheAmericanCollegeofObstetriciansandGynecologists,2010).

Hysterectomyprevalencerateshavevariedindifferentstudies(Borman,McKenna,&Findlay,1986;Bower,Schreiner, Sternfeld,&Lewis,2009;CentersforDiseaseControl,1992;Dickeretal.,1982;Palmer,Rao,Adams-Campbell,&Rosenberg, 1999;Pokras&Hufnagel,1988;Zhangetal.,2005),andhysterectomyprevalencemaycorrelatewithhealthcareprovider ARTICLE INFO

Articlehistory:

Received31December2011 Accepted3January2012 Availableonline21February2012

Keywords:

Hysterectomy Cervicalcancer Reproductivehealth

Physicalandmobilitydisability

ABSTRACT

Thispaperaimstoidentifyself-reportdataforhysterectomyprevalenceandtoexploreits correlatedfactorsamongwomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesinTaiwan.This paperwaspartofalargerstudy,‘‘SurveyonPreventiveHealthUtilizationsofPeoplewith PhysicalandMobilityDisabilityinTaiwan’’,whichisacross-sectionalsurveyconductedin 2009.Werecruited502womenaged315yearswhowereofficiallyregisteredashaving physicalandmobilitydisabilities.Theresultsshowthat11.3%ofwomenwithphysicaland mobilitydisabilitiesacceptedhysterectomysurgeryandthathysterectomyprevalence wasincreasingbyage:7%(45–49years),9.7%(50–54years),26.3%(55–59years),31%(60–

64years)and17.6%(365years).Multilevellogisticregressionanalysesrevealedthatbeing 350yearsorolder(OR=4.65,95%CI=1.79–12.064),havinghadcervicalcancer(OR=17.2, 95%CI=3.5–84.47)andnothavingaPapsmeartestwithinthelast3years(OR=2.79,95%

CI=1.194–6.561) were more likely to accept a hysterectomy operation than their counterparts.Thisstudysuggeststhatfuturestudiesshouldanalyzehospital dataand assesseslong-termchangestounderstandanarea’shysterectomyprofileandcorrelated factorsforthesetypesofvulnerablepopulations.

ß2012ElsevierLtd.Allrightsreserved.

*Correspondingauthorat:SchoolofPublicHealth,NationalDefenseMedicalCenter,161,Min-ChunERd,Sec.6,Nei-Hu,Taipei,Taiwan.

Tel.:+886287923100x18447;fax:+886287923147.

E-mailaddress:a530706@ndmctsgh.edu.tw(J.-D.Lin).

1 Equallycontributedtothispaper.

ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirect

Research in Developmental Disabilities

0891-4222/$seefrontmatterß2012ElsevierLtd.Allrightsreserved.

doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.01.002

(2)

variables and a number of clinical or non-clinical characteristics of women, such as age, race, disease condition, socioeconomicstatus,geographicdiversity(Boweretal.,2009;Boyd,Novetsky,&Curtin,2010;Kjerulff,Guzinski,etal., 1993;Kjerulff,Langenberg,&Guzinkis,1993;Palmeretal.,1999;Rogo-Guptaetal.,2010;Santow&Bracher,1992;Zhang etal.,2005).

Hysterectomycausesmanyphysical,emotionalandsexualsideeffectsforwomen,andthesurgerycarriesagreatmedical carecostintermsofriskofcomplicationsandproductivityloss,anditalsodiminishesqualityoflifeduringtherecovery period(TheAmericanCollegeofObstetriciansandGynecologists,2010).Manywomenwithdisabilitiesareunderservedor vulnerable in many disadvantaged circumstances(Hughes,2006), and theyoften experience a number of barriersin receivingreproductivehealthservicesfromtheirhealthcaresystem(Friedman&Shepeard,2007;Lin,Chen,Lin,&Sung, 2011;Linetal.,2010;Lin,Lin,Chu,&Lin,2011;Lin,Lin,Hsu,etal.,2011;Yenetal.,2011).Oman,Reed,andFerrara(1999) found that incident physical disability wascorrelated with prevalent chronic illnesses, poor vision, obesity, physical inactivity,poormemory,fewersocialactivitiesandhigherdepressionscores.Manystudieshavealsoreportedthatwomen withphysicaldisabilitiesmayusepreventivehealthmeasureslessthanwomenwithoutdisabilities(Becker,Stuifbergen,&

Tinkle,1997;Chengetal.,2001;Kroll,Jones,Kehn,&Neri,2006).Consequently,thesewomenmayriskseriousreproductive healthproblemssuchascervicalcancer.Thepresentpaperaimstocollectself-reportdataabouthysterectomyprevalence andtoexploreitscorrelatedfactorsamongwomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesinTaiwan.

2. Methods

AccordingtoArticle3ofthePhysicallyandMentallyDisabledCitizensProtectionAct(1980)ofTaiwan,disabledpeople areconsideredindividualswhoseabilitiestoparticipateinsocietyandengageinproductiveactivitiesarerestrictedorwho cannotadequatelyservesocialrolesduetophysicalormentallimitations.Afteranassessmentprocess,disabledindividuals enrollinanationaldisabilityregistrysystemthatisregulatedbythegovernmentagencyinchargeofhealthandsocial welfare.PhysicalandmobilitydisabilityisoneofsixteentypesofdisabilitiesinthisAct,andindividualswithphysicaland mobilitydisabilitiesincludeupperandlowerlimbs,spinalcordimpairmentsandothernervoussystemimpairments.

Thepresentpaperwaspartofa largerstudy‘‘SurveyonPreventiveHealthUtilizationsofPeoplewithPhysicaland MobilityDisabilityinTaiwan’’,whichisacross-sectionalsurveyconductedin2009.Astructuredquestionnairewasmailed towomenaged315yearswhowerealsoofficiallyregisteredashavingphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesinTaipeiCounty, Taiwan.Thesurveyincludedquestionsaboutdemographiccharacteristics,self-reportedhealthexperienceandreproductive healthcareusebywomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilities.Thestudysamplecharacteristicshavebeendescribedin detailbyourpreviousreports,includinginformationaboutthesample’sexperiencesofreproductivehealthcareusesuchas Papsmearsandcervicalcancervaccineacceptability(Lin,Chen,etal.,2011;Yenetal.,2011).Inthisanalysis,werecruited 502womenwhocouldprovidedataonhysterectomiestoexamineitsprevalenceandcorrelatedfactors.WeusedSPSS18.0 toanalyzethedataandemployeda rangeofstatisticalmethods(e.g.,chi-squaredtests).Multilevellogistic regression methods,oddsratio(OR)and95%confidenceinterval(CI)allwereusedtoexaminethecorrelatedfactorstohysterectomies inwomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesinthestudy.

3. Results

Thestudyshowedthat11.3%ofwomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitieshadhysterectomysurgery(Fig.1).Table1 showedthatacrosstheagedistributionamonghysterectomycases,thesurgeryrateincreasedsignificantlyinaccordance withage.Thehysterectomyprevalenceineachagegroupwasasfollows:7%(45–49years),9.7%(50–54years),26.3%(55–59 years),31%(60–64years)and17.6%(365years).

Table 2 shows the relation between hysterectomy prevalence and participants’ demographic characteristics with bivariateChi-squaredtests.Wefoundthatstudyparticipantswhowereolder(p<0.001),hadlowereducationallevels (p=0.004),hadspinalcordimpairment(p<0.001),hadmultipledisabilities(p<0.001)andreportedapoorhousehold

11.3

88.7

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Nohysterectomy Hysterectomy

%

Fig.1.Hysterectomyprevalenceforwomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilities(N=502).

(3)

economic situation (p=0.006) were statistically more likely to have had a hysterectomy than their counterparts.

Hysterectomywasnotsignificantlycorrelatedwithmaritalstatus,upper/lowerlimborothernervoussystemimpairments, anddisabilitylevel.

Weanalyzedtherelationbetweenhysterectomyprevalenceandparticipants’healthexperiences(Table3).Ourresults showedthatwomenwhohavehadcervicalcancer(p<0.001)andhavenothadaPapsmeartestwithinthelast3years (p=0.018)weremorelikelytohavehadahysterectomythantheircounterparts.Otherfactorssuchastuballigation,Pap smears(i.e.,everhad,regularlyhaveorhadaPapsmearwithinthelastyear),understandingofandsatisfactorylevelwith Papsmear,andfamiliarity withPapsmear resourceswerenot statisticallycorrelatedwithhysterectomyrates among womenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesinourstudy.

Weconductedmultilevellogisticregressionanalysestoaccountforpossiblefactorsofhysterectomyprevalenceamong women with physical and mobility disabilities (Table 4). With model 1 analyzing predisposing factors which affect hysterectomyprevalence,theresultsshowthatwomenaged350yearsweremorelikelytohavereceivedahysterectomy thanwomenyoungerthan50years(OR=3.69,95%CI=1.54–8.82).Model2consideredpredisposingandenablingfactorsfor hysterectomyprevalence,andwefoundthathouseholdincomewasnotcorrelatedwithwomen’soperations.Model3uses dataconcerninga needforhysterectomysurgery,andtheresultsshowedthatwomenaged350years (OR=4.65,95%

CI=1.79–12.064),whohavehadcervicalcancer(OR=17.2,95%CI=3.5–84.47),andwhohavenothadaPapsmeartestinthe last3years(OR=2.79,95%CI=1.194–6.561)weremorelikelytohavehadahysterectomyoperationthantheircounterparts.

Table1

Ageandhysterectomyratesforwomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilities(N=482).a

Age(years) N HysterectomyN(%) NohysterectomyN(%)

<30 30 0(0) 30(100)

30–34 20 1(5.0) 19(95.0)

35–39 22 1(4.5) 21(95.5)

40–44 45 0(0) 45(100)

45–49 115 8(7.0) 107(93.0)

50–54 113 11(9.7) 102(90.3)

55–59 57 15(26.3) 42(73.7)

60–64 29 9(31.0) 20(69.0)

365 51 9(17.6) 42(82.4)

aMissingdata:20.

Table2

RelationsbetweenhysterectomyanddemographiccharacteristicsofwomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesusingChi-squaredtests.

Variable Nohysterectomy(%) Hysterectomy(%) x2 pvalue

Age(N=482) 17.765 <0.001

<50 241(94.5) 14(5.5)

350 187(82.4) 40(17.6)

Maritalstatus(N=501) 0.322 0.571

Married 368(88.5) 48(11.5)

Unmarried 77(90.6) 8(9.4)

Educationlevel(N=500) 8.291 0.004

Juniorhighschoolandless 192(84.6) 35(15.4)

Seniorhighschoolandmore 253(92.7) 20(7.3)

Upperlimb(N=502) 0.978 0.323

Yes 146(90.7) 15(9.3)

No 299(87.7) 42(12.3)

Lowerlimb(N=501) 0.167 0.682

Yes 323(89.0) 40(11.0)

No 121(87.7) 17(12.3)

Spinalcordimpairment(N=501) 15.482 <0.001

Yes 40(72.7) 15(27.3)

No 404(90.6) 42(9.4)

Othernervoussystemimpairments(N=501) 1.076 0.300

Yes 30(83.3) 6(16.7)

No 414(89.0) 51(11.0)

Multipledisabilities(N=460) 12.458 <0.001

Yes 51(77.3) 15(22.7)

No 361(91.6) 33(8.4)

Disabilitylevel(N=502) 3.815 0.148

Mild 246(90.1) 27(9.9)

Moderate 146(89.6) 17(10.4)

Severeandprofound 54(81.8) 12(18.2)

Householdeconomicsituation(N=491) 7.628 0.006

Good(surplus) 191(93.6) 13(6.4)

Poor(deficit) 246(85.7) 41(14.3)

(4)

Table3

RelationsbetweenhysterectomyandhealthexperiencesofwomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesusingChi-squaredtests.

Variable Nohysterectomy(%) Hysterectomy(%) x2 pvalue

Tuballigation(N=485) 5.549 0.019

Yes 114(85.7) 19(14.3)

No 326(92.6) 26(7.4)

Cervicalcancer(N=500) 40.858 <0.001

Yes 8(44.4) 10(55.6)

No 440(91.3) 42(8.7)

HaseverhadaPapsmear(N=501) 2.287 0.130

Yes 323(90.0) 36(10.0)

No 121(85.2) 21(14.8)

HashadaPapsmearwithinthe1year(N=482) 1.341 0.247

Yes 180(91.4) 17(8.6)

No 251(88.1) 34(11.9)

HashadaPapsmearwithinthelast3years(N=454) 5.553 0.018

Yes 221(92.9) 17(7.1)

No 186(86.1) 30(13.9)

HashadaPapsmearregularly(N=484) 0.559 0.455

Yes 122(90.4) 13(9.6)

No 307(88.0) 42(12.0)

LevelofsatisfactionwiththePapsmearexperience(N=356) 0.181 0.671

Low 84(91.3) 8(8.7)

High 237(89.8) 27(10.2)

UnderstandingregardingPapsmear(N=503) 2.979 0.084

Low 133(85.3) 23(14.7)

High 314(90.5) 33(9.5)

LeveloffamiliaritywithPapsmearrelatedresources(N=490) 0.189 0.664

Low 131(89.7) 15(10.3)

High 304(88.4) 40(11.6)

Table4

Factorscorrelatedwithhysterectomyprevalenceamongpeoplewithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesusingmultilevellogisticregressionanalyses (N=460).

Variable ModelI ModelII ModelIII

OR(95%CI) OR(95%CI) OR(95%CI)

Predisposingfactors Age

<50 1 1 1

350 3.69(1.54–8.82)* 3.78(1.58–9.04)* 4.65(1.79–12.06)*

Educationlevel

Juniorhighschoolorless 1 1 1

Seniorhighschoolormore 0.86(0.38–1.91) 1.0(0.43–2.19) 1.25(0.53–2.95)

Spinalcordimpairment

No 1 1 1

Yes 1.39(0.44–4.44) 1.46(0.46–4.7) 1.80(0.55–5.91)

Multipledisabilities

No 1 1 1

Yes 1.51(0.56–4.04) 1.43(0.53–3.84) 1.47(0.53–4.07)

Enablingfactors

Householdeconomicsituation

Good(surplus) 1 1

Poor(deficit) 0.57(0.24–1.32) 0.57(0.24–1.38)

Needfactors Tuballigation

No 1

Yes 1.16(0.48–2.78)

Cervicalcancer

No 1

Yes 17.2(3.5–84.47)*

HashadaPapsmearwithinthelast3years

Yes 1

No 2.79(1.19–6.56)*

* pvalue<0.05.

(5)

4. Discussion

Thepresentpaperanalyzesself-reportdataofhysterectomyprevalenceandexplorescorrelatedfactorsamongwomen withphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesinTaiwan.Ourstudyisoneofthefirsttopresentdatadescribinghysterectomy prevalenceofwomenwithaphysicaldisability.Wefoundthat11.3%ofwomenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitieshad hysterectomiesandthatprevalenceincreasedsignificantlywithwomen’sage.Ourfindingsforhysterectomyprevalence werehigherthanwhathasbeenfoundforthegeneralpopulationinastudyconductedbyChang,Chang,Ku,andHu(1995), whichindicatedthathysterectomyrateswerebetween6.4%and10.1%forwomenaged40–60years.Chang,Mao,andHu (1996)showedthattheprevalenceofhysterectomiesinfourcommunitiesrangedfrom6.1%to10.0%inTaiwan.However, incomparisontoWesternstudies,womenwithphysicalandmobilitydisabilitiesseemtohavelowerhysterectomyrates thantheircounterparts.IntheUS,hysterectomieshavebeenoneofthemostfrequentlyperformedinpatientsurgeries sincethe1960s,withanestimated33%ofwomenundergoingahysterectomybytheageof60(CentersforDiseaseControl, 1992).Palmeret al. (1999)foundthattheprevalenceof hysterectomyincreasedfrom 1.9%to38.9%amongAfrican American women aged 30–34 years and45–49 years, respectively. Zhang et al. (2005) investigated hysterectomy prevalenceamongAmericanIndianwomen,findingthathysterectomyprevalencerangedfrom24%to34%acrossdifferent agegroups.Prevalenceofhysterectomywas22.2%inIreland,andoperationagepeakedbetween45and49years(Ong, Codd,Coughlan,&O’Herlihy,2000).InNewZealand,Dharmalingam,Pool,andDickson(2000)analyzedanationaldataset ofwomenaged20–59years,andtheyfoundthatwomenaged35–54yearsunderwenthysterectomiesata3-foldincreased rate than women younger than 35 years, and approximately one-quarter of the women aged 50–54 had had hysterectomies.

With Skeaet al. (2004) analyzing women’s perceptions of the decision-making process regarding theeusing of hysterectomyforbenignmenstrualproblems,researchersfoundthatalmostallwomen(97%)reportedsatisfactionwith theirdecisions.However, somewomenhadresidualdoubts regardingtheappropriatenessof hysterectomy.Overall, approximately16%ofwomenwhohaveundergoneahysterectomyhadthesurgeryforreasonsthatwerejudgedtobe clinicallyinappropriate.Onlyonestudyhasshownsignificantlymorehysterectomieswhichhavebeenratedclinically inappropriate,ascomparedwiththegroupmeaningeneralpopulation(Bernsteinetal.,1993).InTaiwan,Chao,Tseng, Su, and Chien (2005) examined the rate of inappropriate hysterectomies, and they found that 74.2% of patients underwenthysterectomyforappropriatereasons,5.6%fordebatablereasonsand20.2%forinappropriatereasons.These studiessuggestthatgynecologistsandphysicianorganizationsshouldtakeactiontoimprovetheappropriateuseof hysterectomy.

Ourstudyreportsthatparticipant factorssuchasolder age,having cervicalcancer, andnothaving a Papsmear testwithinthelast3yearsare relatedtolowerhysterectomy prevalence.InWesternliterature, Zhangetal.(2005) foundthatgeographicarea,priorpregnancylosses,highereducationalattainment,andreduceduseofone’slanguage wereassociatedwithincreasedhysterectomyprevalenceamongAmericanIndianwomen.Boweretal.(2009)evaluated theassociationbetween raceandhysterectomy prevalencein a population-basedcohortofUS women,findingthat blackwomendemonstratedgreateroddsofhysterectomy comparedtowhitewomen(OR=3.52).BrettandHiggins (2003)alsorevealedthatHispanicwomenundergofewerhysterectomiesthannon-HispanicWhitewomen,implying thathysterectomywaspositivelyassociatedwithculturalnorms.Therefore,Palmeretal.(1999)suggestedthatthere may be nonmedicalfactors which could be modified to reduce the rate of hysterectomy among African-American women.

Among other socioeconomic factors associated with hysterectomy prevalence, many studies report that higher educationallevel,occupationalattainmentandfamilyincomearestrongpredictorsofhysterectomyandaresignificantly associatedwithlowerratesofhysterectomyoperations(Dharmalingametal.,2000;Marks&Shinberg,1997).Hartowand Barbieri(1999)foundthatlesseducatedwomenwereapproximatelyfourtimesmorelikelytohavehadahysterectomythan more educated women. A possible explanation is that less educated women may delay seeking health services for gynecologicproblems,whichultimatelymayresultinneedingahysterectomylateron.Palmeretal.(1999)foundthat premenopausalhysterectomieswerestronglyassociatedwithgeographicregionofresidence,anearliermaternalageatfirst birth,ahistoryofuterinefibroidsandahistoryofendometriosis.Hysterectomywasonlyweaklyassociatedwithwomen’s numberofbirthsandageatmenarche,anditwasnotassociatedwithhistoryoftuballigation.

Therearemanylimitationsthatneedtobeaddressedforthisstudy.Ourcross-sectionalsurveywasnotdesignedto determinethecausalrelationshipbetweenpersonaldemographiccharacteristicsandhysterectomy.Second,self-reportsof hysterectomy may underestimate the prevalence of women with physical and mobility disabilities who have had hysterectomiesduetoculturalfactorsinTaiwan.Finally,wedidnotcontrolforhealthproviders,whichmayaffectthe acceptabilityofhysterectomy.Wesuggestthatthefuturestudiesshouldanalyzehospitaldataandassesslong-termchanges tobetterunderstandthehysterectomyprofileanditscorrelatedfactorsforthisvulnerablepopulationofwomen.

Acknowledgments

WeacknowledgethefinancialsupportfromtheBureauofHealthPromotion,DepartmentofHealth,RepublicofChinaof thisstudy(GrantNo.98-10002A).Wealsothankthewomenwhoparticipatedinthisstudy.

(6)

References

Becker,H.,Stuifbergen,A.,&Tinkle,M.(1997).Reproductivehealthcareexperiencesofwomenwithphysicaldisabilities:Aqualitativestudy.ArchivesofPhysical andMedicalRehabilitation,78,S26–S33.

Bernstein,S.J.,McGlynn,E.A.,Siu,A.L.,Roth,C.P.,Sherwood,M.J.,Keesey,J.W.,etal.(1993).Theappropriatenessofhysterectomy:Acomparisonofcareinseven healthplans.TheJournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociation,269,2398–2402.

Borman,B.,McKenna,S.,&Findlay,J.(1986).HysterectomiesinNewZealand.TheNewZealandMedicalJournal,99,470.

Bower,J.K.,Schreiner,P.J.,Sternfeld,B.,&Lewis,C.E.(2009).Black–whitedifferencesinhysterectomyprevalence:TheCARDIAstudy.AmericanJournalofPublic Health,99,300–307.

Boyd,L.R.,Novetsky,A.P.,&Curtin,J.P.(2010).Effectofsurgicalvolumeonrouteofhysterectomyandshort-termmorbidity.Obstetrics&Gynecology,116,909–

915.

Brett,K.M.,&Higgins,J.A.(2003).HysterectomyprevalencebyHispanicethnicity:Evidencefromanationalsurvey.AmericanJournalofPublicHealth,93,307–312.

CentersforDiseaseControl.(1992).HysterectomyprevalenceanddeathratesforcervicalcancerUnitedStates,1965–1988.Morbidity&MortalityWeeklyReport, 41,17–20.

Chang,C.,Chang,C.H.,Ku,S.F.,&Hu,Y.H.(1995).ApreliminarystudyonhysterectomyrateinTaiwan.ChineseJournalofPublicHealth,14,487–493.

Chang,C.,Mao,C.L.,&Hu,Y.H.(1996).PrevalenceofhysterectomyofChinesewomeninTaiwan.InternationalJournalofGynecology&Obstetrics,52,73–74.

Chao,Y.M.,Tseng,T.C.,Su,C.H.,&Chien,L.Y.(2005).AppropriatenessofhysterectomyinTaiwan.JournaloftheFormosanMedicalAssociation,104,107–112.

Cheng,E.,Myers,L.,Wolf,S.,Shatin,D.,Cui,X.P.,Ellison,G.,etal.(2001).Mobilityimpairmentsanduseofpreventiveservicesinwomenwithmultiplesclerosis:

Observationalstudy.BritishMedicalJournal,323,968–969.

Dharmalingam,A.,Pool,I.,&Dickson,J.(2000).BiosocialdeterminantsofhysterectomyinNewZealand.AmericanJournalofPublicHealth,90,1455–1458.

Dicker,R.C.,Scally,M.J.,Greenspan,J.R.,Layde,P.M.,Ory,H.W.,Maze,J.M.,etal.(1982).Hysterectomyamongwomenofreproductiveage:TrendsintheUnited States,1970–1978.TheJournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociation,248,323–327.

Friedman,A.L.,&Shepeard,H.(2007).Exploringtheknowledge,attitudes,beliefs,andcommunicationpreferencesofthegeneralpublicregardingHPV:Findings fromCDCfocusgroupresearchandimplicationsforpractice.HealthEducation&Behavior,34,471–485.

Hartow,B.L.,&Barbieri,R.L.(1999).Influenceofeducationonriskofhysterectomybeforeage45years.AmericanJournalofEpidemiology,150,843–847.

Hughes,R.B.(2006).Introductiontothethemeissueonwomenanddisabilities.Women’sHealthIssues,16,283–285.

Kjerulff,K.H.,Guzinski,G.M.,Langenberg,P.W.,Stolley,P.D.,Moye,N.E.,&Kazandjian,V.A.(1993).Hysterectomyandrace.Obstetrics&Gynecology,82,757–764.

Kjerulff,K.,Langenberg,P.,&Guzinkis,G.(1993).ThesocioeconomiccorrelatesofhysterectomiesintheUnitedStates.AmericanJournalofPublicHealth,83,106–

108.

Kroll,T.,Jones,G.C.,Kehn,M.,&Neri,M.T.(2006).Barriersandstrategiesaffectingtheutilisationofprimarypreventiveservicesforpeoplewithphysical disabilities:Aqualitativeinquiry.HealthandSocialCareintheCommunity,14,284–293.

Lin,J.D.,Chen,S.F.,Lin,L.P.,&Sung,C.L.(2011).Self-reportsofPapsmearscreeninginwomenwithphysicaldisabilities.ResearchinDevelopmentalDisabilities,32, 456–461.

Lin,J.D.,Sung,C.L.,Lin,L.P.,Liu,T.W.,Lin,P.Y.,Chen,L.M.,etal.(2010).PerceptionandexperienceofprimarycarephysiciansonPapsmearscreeningforwomen withintellectualdisabilities:Apreliminaryfindings.ResearchinDevelopmentalDisabilities,31,440–445.

Lin,L.P.,Lin,P.Y.,Chu,C.,&Lin,J.D.(2011).Predictorsofcaregiversupportivebehaviorstowardsreproductivehealthcareforwomenwithintellectualdisabilities.

ResearchinDevelopmentalDisabilities,32,824–829.

Lin,L.P.,Lin,P.Y.,Hsu,S.W.,Loh,C.H.,Lin,J.D., Lai,C.I.,etal.(2011).Caregiverperceptionofreproductivehealthrecognitionandservicesforwomenwith intellectualdisabilitieswhoarecaringinwelfareinstitutions.BMCPublicHealth,11,59.

Marks,N.F.,&Shinberg,D.S.(1997).Socioeconomicdifferencesinhysterectomy:TheWisconsinlongitudinalstudy.AmericanJournalofPublicHealth,87,1507–

1514.

NationalCancerInstitute.(2010).NCIThesaurus,2010_02D<http://ncit.nci.nih.gov/ncitbrowser>Accessed09.04.11.

Oman,D.,Reed,D.,&Ferrara,A.(1999).Doelderlywomenhavemorephysicaldisabilitythanmendo?AmericanJournalofEpidemiology,150,834–842.

Ong,S.,Codd,M.B.,Coughlan,M.,&O’Herlihy,C.(2000).PrevalenceofhysterectomyinIreland.InternationalJournalofGynecology&Obstetrics,69,243–247.

Palmer,J.R.,Rao,R.S.,Adams-Campbell,L.L.,&Rosenberg,L.(1999).CorrelatesofhysterectomyamongAfrican-Americanwomen.AmericanJournalof Epidemiology,150,1309–1315.

PhysicallyandMentallyDisabledCitizensProtectionAct.(1980).Thewholeenactedtextof26articlespromulgatedbyPresidentOrderTai-Tung(1)-Yi-TzuNo.3028 June2,1980.

Pokras,R.,&Hufnagel,V.G.(1988).HysterectomyintheUnitedStates1965–1984.AmericanJournalofPublicHealth,78,852–853.

Rogo-Gupta,L.J.,Lewin,S.N.,Kim,J.H.,Burke,W.M.,Sun,X.,Herzog,T.J.,etal.(2010).Theeffectofsurgeonvolumeonoutcomesandresourceuseforvaginal hysterectomy.Obstetrics&Gynecology,116,1341–1347.

Santow,G.,&Bracher,M.(1992).CorrelatesofhysterectomyinAustralia.SocialSciences&Medicine,34,929–942.

Skea,Z.,Harry,S.,Bhattacharya,S.,Entwistle,V.,Williams,B.,MacLennan,G.,etal.(2004).Women’sperceptionsofdecision-makingabouthysterectomy.BJOG:An InternationalJournalofObstetricsandGynaecology,111,133–142.

TheAmericanCollegeofObstetriciansandGynecologists.(2010).HysterectomyPatienteducationpamphlet.Washington,DC:ACOG.<http://www.acog.org/

publications/patient_education/bp008.cfm>Accessed09.04.11.

Yen,C.F.,Chen,S.F.,Lin,L.P.,Hsu,S.W.,Chang,M.J., Wu,C.L.,etal.(2011).Theacceptabilityofhumanpapillomavirus(HPV)vaccinationamongwomenwith physicaldisabilities.ResearchinDevelopmentalDisabilities,32,2020–2026.

Zhang,Y.,Lee,E.T.,Cowan,L.D.,North,K.E.,Wild,R.A.,&Howard,B.V.(2005).HysterectomyprevalenceandcardiovasculardiseaseriskfactorsinAmerican Indianwomen.Maturitas,52,328–336.

數據

Table 2 shows the relation between hysterectomy prevalence and participants’ demographic characteristics with bivariate Chi-squared tests

參考文獻

相關文件

The PE curriculum contributes greatly to enabling our students to lead a healthy lifestyle with an interest and active participation in physical and aesthetic

 When citing a foreword/introduction/preface/afterword, begin the citation with the name of the person who wrote it, then the word “Foreword” (or whatever it is), without

Teaching study skills and strategies – to students with learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders, or special needs, 2 nd Ed. London: Allyn

Due to the limitation of space, this paper only deals with the above-mentioned problems by referring to the `sutras` and

Opportunities and Inclusion for People with Disabilities Christian Family Service

The aims of this study are: (1) to provide a repository for collecting ECG files, (2) to decode SCP-ECG files and store the results in a database for data management and further

In view of this, this paper attempt to explore the impact of service quality, product involvement, perceive risk on purchase intention.. For affected consumer’s major factor in

This study therefore aimed at Key Success Factors for Taiwan's Fiber Active components Industry initiative cases analysis to explore in order to provide for enterprises and