國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院生物科技研究所 博士論文
Institute of Biotechnology
College of Bio-Resources and Agriculture National Taiwan University
絲胺酸蛋白酶抑制蛋白 E2 在
精子獲能作用與卵子成熟過程中所扮演的角色 The roles of the SERPINE2 protein in sperm capacitation
and oocyte maturation
呂仲浩 Chung-Hao Lu
指導教授:林劭品 博士 Advisor: Shau-Ping Lin, Ph.D.
中華民國 103 年 1 月
January 2014
誌謝
感謝指導教授 林劭品老師於求學期間的百般呵護及教導,在學術道路上之 循循善誘,使我了解到學術之浩瀚,永無止境,師恩永銘吾心。感謝李勝祥博士 在研究上毫無保留的指導及鼎力支持,在為人處事上的諄諄教誨,讓我獲益良多。
本論文復蒙口試委員 胡玉銘醫師、宋麗英老師、羅清維老師、林翰佳老師之詳細 審閱與詳加斧正始克完成,謹致由衷感謝。
求學期間承蒙馬偕紀念醫院不孕症科李國光醫師的支持,胡玉銘醫師的栽培 及鼓勵,生殖醫學中心美女群們在實驗上的幫助。台大動科所鄭登貴老師及吳信 志老師在課業上的解惑及幫助。還有台大生技所的導師兼同窗好友宋麗英老師不 斷的加油打氣,謝了同學,博班生涯有妳的參與何其有幸。
回首求學期間,酸甜苦辣之路程,有感於情感之可貴,幸有許多好友的的陪 伴,N 年死黨羽璋的深度酒精治療,正妹麻吉映潔的幫助及關懷,以及生殖內分
泌實驗室戰友法拉利玲瑜、學妹殺手煥清、只要還可以什麼都喜歡的清文,還有 403 實驗室所有夥伴們,研究生涯有你們加入,使其更加完整。
最該感謝的是已經伴我 20 年的美吟,謝謝你的照顧及體諒,使我得以無後
顧之憂,並陪我度過最艱難的時期。最後僅以此微薄之研究論文獻予生我育我的 父母。
中文摘要
絲胺酸蛋白酶抑制蛋白 E2 (SERPINE2)為一種可以抑制絲胺酸蛋白酶活性
的 蛋 白 質 , 其 藉 由 抑 制 絲 胺 酸 蛋 白 酶 活 性 來 參 與 許 多 生 理 功 能 。 目 前 已 知 SERPINE2 可以調控 plasminogen activator 及 thrombin 的酵素活性。在第一部份的
研 究 中 , 首 先 我 們 從 小 鼠 儲 精 囊 分 泌 液 中 純 化 出 具 有 可 以 抑 制 plasminogen activator 活性的 SERPINE2 蛋白質。接著發現 SERPINE2 會結合在射出的小鼠精子
以 及 已 經 游 入 輸 卵 管 的 精 子 , 但 是 無 法 在 已 發 生 獲 能 反 應 的 精 子 身 上 發 現 SERPINE2 蛋白質的存在。此外,在體外試驗中發現 SERPINE2 也會抑制牛血清白 蛋白(BSA)所引起的精子獲能反應,使得精子無法與卵子結合進而影響與卵子的受 精作用。精子身上的膽固醇移除(cholesterol efflux)為發生獲能反應的重要步驟,而 SERPINE2 的存在會去抑制精子身上膽固醇的移除,因此 SERPINE2 可能扮演著精 子去獲能因子(decapacitation factor)的角色。
Plasminogen activator 已被證實存在於排卵過程中的濾泡壁上,但其在卵子成
熟過程中的相關功能仍然未知。在第二部份的研究中我們證實了PLAU (urokinase
plasminogen activator)及其抑制者 SERPINE2 參與小鼠卵丘細胞擴張(cumulus expansion)及卵子成熟。當高量的 SERPINE2 結合上卵丘細胞之細胞間質(ECM)時
會降低 PLAU 的活性,導致卵丘細胞無法擴張,進而影響卵子成熟。因此在病人
進行人工生殖技術過程中,額外加入 PLAU 蛋白質於體外培養系統中,或許可以
幫助不成熟卵子進行最後階段之熟成而提高受精率。
綜合這些實驗結果,我們認為 SERPINE2 蛋白質可以在精子到達輸卵管之 前保護精子並避免其過早發生獲能反應。此外,我們推測部分不孕症病人之卵丘
細胞無法擴張及卵子無法成熟可能與SERPINE2 蛋白質不正常的高量表現有關。
關鍵字:
絲胺酸蛋白酶抑制蛋白E2、絲胺酸蛋白酶、精子、獲能作用、受精作用、卵丘細
胞擴張、卵子成熟。
Abstract
SERPINE2, one of the potent serine protease inhibitors that modulate the activity of plasminogen activator and thrombin, is implicated in many biological processes. In the first study, we purified SERPINE2 from mouse seminal vesicle secretion based on its potent inhibitory activity against the urokinase-type plasminogen activator. A prominent amount of SERPINE2 was detected on ejaculated and oviductal spermatozoa, predominantly on uncapacitated sperm, suggesting the need to remove SERPINE2 before initiation of the capacitation process. Moreover, SERPINE2 could inhibit in vitro bovine serum albumin-induced sperm capacitation and prevent sperm binding to the egg, thus blocking fertilization. It acts through preventing cholesterol efflux, one of the initiation events of capacitation, from the sperm. These findings suggest that SERPINE2 protein may play a role as a sperm decapacitation factor.
Plasminogen activators play a crucial role in follicle wall rupture during ovulation; however, their function in oocyte maturation during pre-ovulation remained unclear. Our second study provides the first evidence that PLAU (urokinase plasminogen activator) and its inhibitor SERPINE2 are involved in murine cumulus expansion and oocyte maturation. High SERPINE2 levels bound to the extracellular matrix of cumulus cells could reduce PLAU activity, and ultimately suppressing cumulus expansion and oocyte maturation. PLAU supplementation to culture medium
may assist the final maturation of the immature human oocytes collected during assisted reproductive technology procedures, thus providing a potential therapeutic strategy.
Based on these results, SERPINE2 protein possibly influencese on sperm to prevent precocious capacitation and the acrosome reaction before sperm reach the oviduct. In addition, we suppose that aberrantly high SERPINE2 protein levels in cumulus cells may be one of the etiologies for patients with defects in cumulus expansion and subsequent oocyte maturation.
Keywords:
SERPINE2, serine protease, sperm, capacitation, fertilization, plasminogen
activator, cumulus expansion, oocyte maturation
CONTENTS
口試委員審定書………..………..2
誌謝………3
中文摘要……….4
Abstract
………...……6Chapter 1 Introduction
...………..………...……..………..….151.1 Prolegomenon
………...………151.2 Sperm Capacitation / Decapacitation and Fertility
...151.3 Identification and Characterization of Seminal Plasma Secretions Importance for Decapacitation factor
………..………171.4 SERPINE2 Protein Characteristics and Functions
……….………..191.5 The Potential Role of SERPINE2 in Reproduction
………201.6 Cumulus Expansion and Oocyte Maturation
………...…..….21Chapter 2
Study I: SERPINE2, a Serine Protease Inhibitor Extensively Expressed
in Adult Male Mouse Reproductive Tissues, May Serve as a Murine
Sperm Decapacitation Factor
………...………242.2 Materials and Methods
………..252.3 Results
...372.4 Discussion
………..………442.5 Conclusion
………...…………..492.6 Figures
………..……..51Chapter 3 Study II: Involvement of the serine protease inhibitor, SERPINE2, and the urokinase plasminogen activator in cumulus expansion and oocyte maturation
………...……603.1 Introduction
………..……….603.2 Materials and Methods
...613.3 Results
………...………..703.4 Discussion
………..773.5 Conclusion
...823.6 Figures
………..…..84Chapter 4 Summary
………..………..………114Chapter 5
Future prospects
………..…………116References
………...……..118Curriculum Vitae
……….130FIGURE CONTENTS
FIG. 1. Purification of SERPINE2 from mouse SVS………..51
FIG. 2. Tissue distribution and antibody specificity………52
FIG. 3. Immunolocalization of SERPINE2 in male accessory reproductive tissues…….53
FIG. 4. Demonstration of the binding of SERPINE2 to sperm………54
FIG. 5. Staining patterns of sperm in the oviduct……….56
FIG. 6. Effects of SPERINE2 on murine sperm capacitation………...57
FIG. 7. Influence of SERPINE2 on sperm–egg interactions………58
FIG. 8. Effect of SERPINE2 on BSA-induced cholesterol removal from capacitated sperm………...59
FIG. 9. SERPINE2 expression in cumulus cells of the human oocyte……….………..84
FIG. 10. Serpine2 and Plau expression in mouse cumulus cells during oocyte maturation……….……….86
FIG. 11. Silencing of Serpine2 expression and antiserum blockage of SERPINE2 protein………..88
FIG. 12. Effects of Serpine2 overexpression and addition of exogenous SERPINE2 on cumulus expansion………..90
FIG. 13. Involvement of PLAU in cumulus expansion and oocyte maturation…………..92
FIG. 14. Effect of exogenous PLAU and SERPINE2 on matrix gene expression and the
hyaluronan status of cumulus cells during IVM……….94
FIG. 15. Construction of the Serpine2 expression vector……….96
FIG. 16. Immunofluorescence staining for SERPINE2 protein levels in human cumulus
cells……….….98
FIG. 17. Immunohistochemistry of SERPINE2 protein in cumulus cells treated with Serpine2 siRNA……….100
FIG. 18. Hyaluronan matrix staining of the tissue section and COC………..102
FIG. 19. Immunolocalization of SERPINE2 and PLAU in ovarian follicles during gonadotropin treatment………103
FIG. 20. Cumulus SERPINE2 and PLAU protein levels in COCs treated with hCG in vivo or cultured in vitro………105
FIG. 21. PLAT expression in cumulus cells of human oocytes……….…………107
TABLE CONTENTS
Table 1. Summary of real-time PCR primers………..108
Table 2. Effects of Serpine2 siRNA and anti-SERPINE2 antiserum on oocyte
maturation……….111
Table 3. Effects of Serpine2 overexpression in cumulus cells and exogenously added SERPINE2 on oocyte maturation……….…………112
Table 4. Effects of PLAU protein on oocyte maturation……….113
Abbreviations Table
Full name Abbreviations
Protein kinase A PKA
Seminal vesicle secretion SVS
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator PLAU
Prostasin PRSS8 Tissue-type plasminogen activator PLAT
Plasminogen activators PAs
Cumulus-oocyte complexes COCs
Extracellular matrix ECM
Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor ITIH
Pentraxin-3 PTX3 Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 6 TNFAIP6
Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry LC-MS/MS
Bovine serum albumin BSA
Dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO
TRITC-conjugated peanut agglutinin lectin PNA
Hyaluronan synthase 2 HAS2
Versican Vcan
In vitro maturation IVM
Germinal vesicle GV
Metaphase I MI
Metaphase II MII
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR qRT-PCR
Multiple cloning site MCS
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Prolegomenon
Germ cells are the vehicles for transmitting genetic materials to the next generation. Fully functional oocytes and sperms are therefore critical for reproduction.
Infertility is a worldwide reproductive health problems, in which some infertility cases are caused by suboptimal quality of sperm and oocytes. Oocyte maturity and quality are key limiting factors in female fertility. Several studies indicated oocyte maturity and quality will affect subsequent embryo development or pregnancy [1-3]. On the other hand, ejaculated sperm are necessary to swim and reside in the female reproductive tract for a period of time to acquire the ability to fertilize the oocyte. Many events are involved in this process, such as capacitation and acrosome reaction. Only one capacitated sperm can penetrate the zona pellucida, and then fertilize the oocyte. In this study, we purified and characterized the SERPINE2 protein from seminal plasma where capacitation moderators reside. I will describe how the SERPINE2 protein affects sperm function and oocyte maturation.
Capacitation is a complex process first independently described and defined by Chang MC et al [4] and Austin CR et al [5]. It is a physiological change in sperm that occurs in the oviduct of some mammals to acquire the ability to fertilize an egg [6]. It can be mimicked in vitro in specifically defined medium [4,6]. Our current knowledge of capacitation largely originates from in vitro studies [7-11]. Capacitation is initiated by removal of cholesterol from the sperm plasma membrane [7,8,12-14]. Cholesterol efflux leads to changes in the membrane structure and fluidity, which then increases the permeability of sperm to calcium (Ca2+) and bicarbonate (HCO3- ) ions, thus raising levels of sperm intracellular calcium ions ([Ca Ca2+ ]i) and the pH. Elevated levels of sperm intracellular Ca2+ and HCO3- can activate adenyl cyclase and lead to the increases in intracellular levels of cAMP, activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), and finally induction of tyrosine phosphorylation of a subset of sperm proteins [9].
Sperm capacitation usually occurs in the mammalian oviduct at the right time, but the occasional premature capacitation that may affect sperm fertility. Therefore, decapacitation factor can modulate and protect fertilizing ability of sperm, which make sure sperm do the right thing in the right place at the right time.
The existence of decapacitation factors, which are removed from the sperm head surface during the capacitation process and are able to reverse sperm capacitation, in seminal plasma have been known for more than 50 years [15]. Since the discovery of
decapacitation factors existence, many proteins have been suggested to be decapacitation factors. The sperm’s surface is immersed in a protein-rich solution of seminal plasma which is mixed with secretions from the accessory sexual glands. These seminal proteins interact with sperm and modulate changes in the sperm’s physiology, and thus prevent them from premature capacitation [16]. The decapacitation factors, which cause capacitated sperm to lose the ability to fertilize, are present in seminal plasma [15]. They are removed from the surface of the sperm’s head before or during the capacitation process. However, their identity and functions have not been fully characterized.
1.3 Identification and Characterization of Seminal Plasma Secretions Importance for
Decapacitation Factor
Most of the decapacitation factors identified so far are purified from seminal plasma secretion. The seminal vesicle is a male accessory sexual gland found in many mammalian species, which secretes a fluid called seminal vesicle secretion (SVS). SVS contributes a major portion to the liquid part of seminal plasma, which is a complex biological fluid formed from a mixture of secretions from various male reproductive tissues. Studies found that the removal of the seminal vesicle from mice and rats greatly
fertility. Proteins from seminal plasma interact with sperm and modify the sperm’s surface membrane, an essential process in maintaining sperm viability, thus modulating their functions [19]. In humans, several potential decapacitation factors that have been reported which include glycodelin-S [20], semenogelin I [21], a 130-kDa glycoprotein [22], and some mannosyl glycopeptides [23]. Several potential decapacitation factors from rodents were also identified, including a 40-kDa glycoprotein [24], phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1) [25]; three epididymal proteins, a cysteine-rich secretory protein 1 [26]; an acrosome-stabilizing factor [27]; and an epididymis-specific secretory protein, HongrES1 (symbol not official) [28,29]; and two secreted seminal vesicle proteins, SVA [30] and SVS2 [31,32]. Attempts have also been made to reveal sperm physiology modulating activities from other murine seminal vesicle secretory proteins. For example, a carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM10) [33] and SVS7 [34] were found responsible for enhancing sperm motility. A kazal-type serine protease inhibitor (SPINK3), named P12, is able to suppress Ca2þ uptake by sperm [35]. Recently, the secreted LY6 protein (SSLP-1) was found to be expressed predominantly in SVS [36], although its function is unclear. In order to identify and characterize more factors important for decapacitation activities, we purified and characterized of the decapicitation factors in the mouse seminal plasma. In our previous study, we found a secreted serine protease inhibitor
Kazal-type-like (SPINKL) protein. The SPINKL protein was purified from mouse seminal vesicle secretions through a series of steps, including ion-exchange chromatography on a diethylaminoethyl-Sephacel column, gel filtration on a Sephadex G-75 column, and ion-exchange HPLC on a Q strong anion exchange column. The SPINKL protein is able to bind onto sperm and enhance sperm motility. Also, it was able to suppress BSA-stimulated sperm capacitation and block sperm-oocyte interactions in vitro, suggesting that SPINKL may be a decapacitation factor [37].
However, other important components of the SVS remain to be identified. Further investigation of the SVS proteome may enhance our understanding of normal and abnormal male reproductive physiology. We therefore performed another round of screening based on decapacitation activity in order to identify novel decapacitation factors. We purified SERPINE2 from mouse seminal vesicle secretions, based on its potential function in actively inhibiting capacitation process. I will describe our characterization of SERPINE2’s involvement in sperm decapacitation in Chapter 2.
1.4 SERPINE2 Protein Characteristics and Functions
SERPINE2, also known as glia-derived nexin or protease nexin-1, belongs to the serine protease inhibitor superfamily. It has broad antiprotease activity specific to serine
(PLAU) [38], and prostasin (PRSS8) [39]. SERPINE2 can inhibit PLAU and tissue-type plasminogen activator (PLAT). Plasminogen activators (PAs) are involved in tissue remodeling by converting abundant extracellular plasminogen into active protease plasmin, which degrades almost all matrix proteins [40]. The PA system is associated with many physiological processes, including ovulation, embryogenesis, and embryo implantation in female reproductive tissues [40,41], and pathological processes, such as neoplasia [40]. Two PA types, PLAT and PLAU, and four types of SERPINs, including SERPINA5, SERPINB2, SERPINE1, and SERPINE2, constitute the PA system [40].
Understanding how serpins modulate PLAT/PLAU proteolytic activities is considerably important in developing therapeutic strategies for PA-involved tissue remodeling.
1.5 The Potential Role of SERPINE2 in Reproduction
SERPINE2 protein is extensively expressed in reproductive tissues, e.g., the placenta [42,43], uterus [43,44] and ovary [45,46]. However, different species have different expression patterns of Serpine2/SERPINE2. Lin et al. reported that expression levels of SERPINE2 in the monkey endometrium and placenta during early pregnancy were weak or below the level of detection [47]. On the contrary, SERPINE2 was highly expressed in the human placenta throughout pregnancy [48]. In rats, Serpine2 mRNA
6.5 postcoitally, suggesting that it may be involved in the implantation process [49].
Our previous study demonstrated that SERPINE2 was a major PAs inhibitor in the mouse placenta and uterus during the estrous cycle, pregnancy, and lactation. It may participate in the PA-modulated tissue remodeling process in the mouse placenta and uterus [44]. PAs are associated with many reproductive processes, e.g., ovulation [50,51], embryonic development [52], embryo implantation [53], and pathological processes [40]. The expression and activity of PLAT and PLAU were detected in female reproductive tissues, including the endometrium during cycling [54,55], implantation [53], and placentation [56-59]. Also, PLAU was found to be expressed during mouse placental development [59].
1.6 Cumulus Expansion and Oocyte Maturation
In most mammals, cumulus cells are specialized granulosa cells surrounding, touching the oocyte and nourishing the oocyte development. Cumulus cells surround the oocyte to form a cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) and that are required for the successful maturation of oocytes and fertilization. The absence of cumulus cells impairs embryo production. Denuded oocytes in culture cannot undergo normal fertilization and development. The structural integrity of the cumulus cell extracellular matrix (ECM) is
e.g., heavy chain of inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor (ITIH) [60], pentraxin-3 (PTX3) [61,62], and tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 6 (TNFAIP6) [1], are required for maintaining cumulus integrity, thus ensuring cumulus expansion and oocyte maturation [2,61,63].
Oocyte maturation refers to the progression of the oocyte nucleus from the germinal vesicle to the metaphase II stage. Nuclear maturation involves GVBD, condensation of chromosomes, metaphase I spindle formation, separation of the homologous chromosomes with extrusion of the first polar body and arrest at metaphase II [64]. During oocyte maturation, cumulus cells change from a compact cell into a dispersed structure of cells for the synthesis of extracellular matrix, spaces between cumulus cells in cumulus–oocyte complexes become enlarged, and cells become embedded in a sticky, mucified matrix, This phenomenon is referred to as cumulus expansion. Cumulus expansion is thought to influence a variety of fundamental developmental changes during oocyte maturation. Expansion of the cumulus-oocyte complex correlates with the outcome of oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryo development. Therefore, detailed functional studies of cumulus expansion seem to be required to elucidate the mechanism of oocyte maturation. Cumulus expansion involves hyaluronan accumulation in the intercellular spaces of cumulus cells, and its induction by gonadotropins is crucial for oocyte maturation [3]. Oocyte-secreted molecules, e.g.,
growth differentiation factor 9 and bone morphogenetic protein 15, also affect cumulus expansion [65,66].
Thus, bidirectional intercellular communication between oocytes and their surrounding cumulus cells is important for the development of an egg that is competent to undergo fertilization and embryogenesis [3,67,68]. In chapter 3, I will describe our findings concerning the importance of cumulus cell expressing SERPINE2 in oocyte maturation.
Chapter 2
Study I: SERPINE2, a Serine Protease Inhibitor Extensively Expressed in Adult Male Mouse Reproductive Tissues, May Serve as a Murine Sperm Decapacitation Factor
2.1 Introduction
SERPINE2 protein is widely expressed in various tissues, whereas the highest level is found in the seminal vesicles [69]. The Serpine2 gene knockout causes abnormal alterations in SVS components, which may result in an imbalance between PLAU, expressed in seminal vesicles [70], and SERPINE2. Thus, the vaginal plug becomes soft and shortened after mating and eventually impairs male fertility [71].
However, Pang et al. [17]found that removal of the coagulating glands, resulting in the absence of a vaginal plug, did not seem to explain the reduced fertility, which indicates that seminal vesicles may contribute certain factors to modulate fertility. Therefore, in addition to having a role in balancing the activity of proteases, SERPINE2 may also play a role in male reproduction. Although SERPINE2 was detected in portions of male reproductive tissues [45,69] the comprehensive expression patterns and functions of
Proteins from the seminal plasma interact with sperm by modifying the sperm surface membrane, an essential process in maintaining sperm viability, thus modulating their functions [20]. Decapacitation factors are one of those proteins in seminal plasma important for preventing premature capacitation. The sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction are essential for sperm-egg fertilization but premature capacitation will shorten sperm’s lifespan and potentially miss the fertilization opportunity. In the study I, we purified SERPINE2 protein from the mouse seminal vesicle to delineate its protein distribution in the male reproductive system and to study its effects on sperm function.
2.2 Materials and Methods
Animals
Specific pathogen-free outbred ICR mice were purchased from BioLASCO Taiwan (Taipei, Taiwan). The animals were bred based on the technology derived from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and were maintained in the Animal Center at the Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, and were treated according to institutional guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals.
They were housed under controlled lighting (12L:12D) at 21–22ºC and provided with water and NIH-31 laboratory chow ad libitum.
Protein Purification and Analysis
Adult male mice (10–12 weeks old) were killed by cervical dislocation. The SVS was successively collected, centrifuged, and fractionated by ion-exchange chromatography using a diethylaminoethyl Sephacel (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ) column and gel filtration with a Sephadex G-75 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) column as previously described [36]. The potential SERPINE2-containing peak II eluted from the Sephadex G-75 column was further subjected to a heparin Sepharose 6 Fast Flow (2.6- X 10-cm) column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) preequilibrated with 0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.01 M sodium citrate, and 0.225 M NaCl (pH 7.4). After the nonretarded fractions were washed out, the column was eluted with 0.5 M NaCl in 0.1 M Tris-HCl and 0.01 M sodium citrate at pH 7.4 at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min; fractions (2 ml) were collected, and absorbance records are shown in Figure 1A.
The protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The N-glycoconjugate was removed from a glycoprotein using a PNGase F kit (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Protein Identification by Mass Spectrometry
Purified protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE on a 10% slab gel. Protein bands on the SDS gel were excised and subjected to in-gel digestion with trypsin. In brief, the gel was washed in a solution of 50% (v/v) acetonitrile and 100 mM NH4HCO3 and digested by trypsin overnight at 37 ºC. The tryptic peptides were then extracted with a solution of 60% (v/v) acetonitrile and 1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), lyophilized, resuspended in 0.1% (v/v) TFA, and analyzed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) equipped with an 1100 series HPLC unit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) and an LTQ FT hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA). MS/MS data were used for protein identification, using MASCOT search engine software (http://www.matrixscience.com), based on the International Protein Index databases (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/IPI).
Activity Assay
The inhibitory activity of SERPINE2 toward PLAU (also named uPA) was assayed using a uPA colorimetric assay kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 5 µg of purified SERPINE2 protein was incubated with 5 units of PLAU for 1 h at 37ºC. Subsequently, assay buffer and chromogenic substrate were added and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. The absorbance was read at 405 nm.
Antibody Production and Usage
Antisera against SERPINE2 were produced using New Zealand white rabbits.
Purified SERPINE2 protein in normal saline (0.4 mg/ml) was emulsified with Freund’s complete adjuvant (1:1, v/v). In total, 2 ml of the mixture was subcutaneously injected in multiple sites in individual rabbits. Two rabbits were boosted twice every 3 weeks with the mixture of the same amount of purified protein and Freund’s incomplete adjuvant (1:1, v/v). Antisera were collected 10 days after the last injection. Purified SERPINE2 protein (200 µg) was conjugated to AminoLink beads (Pierce) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Antisera against SERPINE2 were adsorbed by the conjugated beads to remove the specific antibody against SERPINE2. The treated antiserum was used as the control antiserum. Antisera were also used to develop a custom-made sandwich-style ELISA kit by Taiwan Advanced Bio-Pharm (Taipei, Taiwan). The kit was used to estimate the SERPINE2 protein concentration in SVS, which was collected separately from 6 male mice at the age of 12 weeks.
Western Blotting
Proteins were resolved using SDS-PAGE on a 10% slab gel (8.2 × 7.3 × 0.075 cm) and stained with Coomassie Brilliant blue or transferred to a nitrocellulose
membrane for immunostaining. Membranes were blocked with 10% (w/v) skim milk in PBS (blocking solution) for 2 h and then incubated with anti-SERPINE2 antiserum or control antiserum (1:8000 dilution) in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature.
After gentle agitation over four changes of PBS for 10 min each, membranes were immunoreacted with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) diluted to 1:10 000 in blocking solution for 1 h. Immunoreactive bands were revealed using an enhanced chemiluminescence substrate according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Pierce).
Immunohistochemical Staining of the Accessory Gland of Male Mice
Murine (~12 weeks old) reproductive tissues were collected, fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5-lm sections. After the slides were deparaffinized and hydrated, they were placed in a plastic slide holder filled with antigen retrieval AR-10 solution (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA), soaked in a 70°C water bath, rapidly boiled to 95°C, and maintained for 15 min. While cooling to room temperature for 30 min, the slides were treated with 3% (v/v) H2O2 in PBS for 15 min, blocked with 10%
(v/v) normal goat serum in PBS (blocking solution) for 1 h at room temperature, and then incubated with anti-SERPINE2 antiserum or the control antiserum diluted 1:1000 in the blocking solution at 4 ºC for 16 h. After slides were washed, they were treated
with biotin-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (~3 µg/ml) (Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA) in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were washed again and then incubated with HRP-conjugated streptavidin (~1 µg/ml) (Zymed Laboratories) in blocking solution for 40 min at room temperature. Protein signals were detected by 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole staining (Zymed Laboratories). Slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and photographed using an Olympus BX 40 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an Olympus DP-70 digital camera.
Preparation of Spermatozoa
Epididymides and testes were immediately removed after male mice (;12 weeks old) were killed. Caudal epididymides were slit in prewarmed Biggers, Whitten, and Whittingham (BWW) medium and incubated at 37 ºC in 5% CO 2 for 15 min to allow motile sperm to swim upward. Motile sperm in the upper layer were collected. The caput and corpus regions of epididymides were treated in the same method as described above but were gently filtered through a 70 µm nylon cell strainer (BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ) to remove debris. Testes were decapsulated by cutting the tunica albuginea to expose seminiferous tubules. An 18-gauge needle was used to aspirate the seminiferous tubules and push them through. The dispersed seminiferous tubules were
cut into pieces and filtered through a 70-lm nylon cell strainer (BD Falcon) to collect the free seminiferous cells. To isolate ejaculated uterine and oviductal sperm, female mice (6 weeks old) were induced to superovulate by an intraperitoneal injection of 10 IU of equine chronic gonadotropin (China Chemical and Pharmaceutical, Hsinchu, Taiwan), followed by an intraperitoneal injection of 10 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (China Chemical and Pharmaceutical) 48 h later, and were subsequently mated with male mice (~16 weeks old). Female mice with plugged vaginas were killed, and the ejaculated sperm in the uterine cavity were collected within 1 h. In brief, the semen filtered through a 70 µm nylon cell strainer (BD Falcon) was repeatedly agitated by pipetting with PBS. The sperm solution was washed by centrifuging it three times at 100 X g for 10 min. Sperm were then fixed using 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in an Eppendorf tube for 20 min at room temperature, transferred onto slides, and allowed to dry. Oviductal sperm were collected the next day after mating by flushing the oviduct with PBS. Sperm were transferred using a mouth pipette onto slides and fixed in 4%
(w/v) paraformaldehyde for subsequent immunostaining analysis.
Immunolocalization of SERPINE2 on Spermatozoa
To determine whether SERPINE2 protein is originally a sperm-binding protein, freshly prepared epididymal and testicular spermatozoa were fixed using 4% (w/v)
paraformaldehyde and allowed to dry on a glass slide and washed twice with PBS. After slides were incubated in blocking solution of PBS containing 10% (v/v) normal goat serum for 1 h at room temperature, they were incubated with anti-SERPINE2 antiserum or control antiserum at a dilution of 1:100 in blocking solution for 1 h. The slides were washed three times with PBS to remove excess antibodies before they were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories) diluted 1:500 in blocking solution for 40 min. All slides were then washed with PBS and counterstained with 5μg/ml Hoechst 33258 stain. After three brief rinses with PBS, the slides were mounted in 100μl of ProLong Gold antifade medium (Invitrogen Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and photographed using an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus BX 40) equipped with an Olympus DP-70 digital camera. To determine whether exogenous SERPINE2 protein can bind to epididymal sperm, 0.5 μM SERPINE2 was incubated with living sperm in Eppendorf tubes for 20 min at 37℃.
Unbound SERPINE2 protein was washed away by centrifuging the sperm in the PBS solution at 100 x g for 5 min at room temperature. Sperm were then fixed using 4%
(w/v) paraformaldehyde in an Eppendorf tube for 20 min at room temperature, transferred onto slides, and allowed to dry. Immunostaining was done as described above, except a dilution of 1:1000 was used for anti-SERPINE2 antiserum and control antiserum. The same dilution was also used to examine SERPINE2 on ejaculated and
oviductal sperm, without incubation with the exogenous SERPINE2 protein. To examine the correlation between SERPINE2-bound sperm and sperm capacitation, oviductal sperm were double fluorescence labeled by using indirect immunofluorescence and chlortetracycline (CTC) fluorescence staining, an empirical method used to morphologically assess sperm capacitation [72,73]. In brief, sperm slides were washed twice with PBS and incubated in blocking solution, as mentioned above, for 1 h at room temperature. Then the slides were incubated with anti-SERPINE2 antiserum or control antiserum at a dilution of 1:1000 in blocking solution for 1 h. After slides were washed three times with PBS, they were incubated with tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) diluted 1:200 in blocking solution for 40 min. All slides were then washed with PBS and counterstained with 5 µg/ml Hoechst 33258. After three brief rinses with PBS, the sperm on the slides were stained with a CTC solution prepared as previously described [72,73] by incubation at 4℃ overnight and photographed using an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus BX 40) equipped with an Olympus DP-70 digital camera.
Evaluation of Sperm Capacitation and the Acrosome Reaction
The molecular basis of sperm capacitation was examined by detecting any
capacitation-accompanied increase in protein tyrosine phosphorylation of a subset of proteins with molecular weights of 40,000–120,000, according to a previously described method [7]. In brief, about 5 x 106 spermatozoa/ml was incubated in modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate medium [74] with or without bovine serum albumin (BSA) (3 mg/ml), as the positive or negative control, respectively, or BSA replaced with SERPINE2 at 37℃ in an atmosphere of 5% (v/v) CO2 in humidified air for 90 min. To assess the effect of SERPINE2 on BSA-induced capacitation, SERPINE2 was preincubated with sperm under the above-described conditions for 20 min, and BSA was added thereafter. Then, the soluble fraction of sperm protein extracts was subjected to SDS-PAGE on an 8% slab gel. Proteins on the gel were electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose paper. Western blot analyses were performed using an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody according to a method described previously [75]. To evaluate sperm capacitation by the CTC fluorescence-staining method, freshly prepared epididymal spermatozoa (106 cells/ml) were capacitated in 50 µl of BWW medium with or without BSA (3 mg/ml) as the positive or negative control, respectively, at 37℃ in an atmosphere of 5% (v/v) CO2 in humidified air for 90 min. Medium was supplemented with SERPINE2 as described above, or the BSA was replaced with SERPINE2 to analyze the effects of SERPINE2 on sperm capacitation in vitro. CTC staining of sperm was carried out following the original method and examined using a
fluorescence microscope (BX 40 model; Olympus). To analyze the sperm acrosome reaction, the capacitated sperm, prepared as described above, were treated with 5 μM A23187 in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (0.2%) at 37℃ for 30 min. Sperm were smeared on the slide and fixed with methanol for 30 sec. The sperm acrosomal status was assessed by staining samples with 5 μg/ml TRITC-conjugated peanut agglutinin lectin (PNA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in the dark for 5 min and by counterstaining with 5 μg/ml Hoechst 33258. After three brief rinses in PBS, slides were mounted in 50 μl of ProLong Gold antifade medium (Invitrogen Molecular Probes) and immediately examined with a fluorescence microscope (BX 40; Olympus).
Sperm–Egg Binding and In Vitro Fertilization
Epididymal sperm (2 x 105 cells/ml) in 150μl of BWW medium under mineral oil with or without BSA and/or SERPINE2 were capacitated for 90 min at 37℃ in an atmosphere of 5% (v/v) C O 2 in humidified air. Oocyte-cumulus complexes collected by superovulation treatment, as described above, were added to the same medium. For the sperm–egg binding assay, treated sperm were inseminated with oocyte-cumulus complexes for 30 min and then gently transferred using a mouth pipette with a bore approximately 1.53 the diameter of the oocyte to 70μl of PBS under mineral oil. After allowing specimens to sit at room temperature for 5 min, the loosely bound sperm were
detached, and the tightly bound sperm on the oocyte were counted using a Zeiss Axiovert 100 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). For in vitro fertilization, after 6 h of insemination, oocytes were washed with BWW medium, using a mouth pipette, fixed onto a slide with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde, and stained in 5μg/ml Hoechst 33258 for 3 min. Slides were observed with a fluorescence microscope (BX40;
Olympus). Two pronuclei embryos were scored as fertilized.
Cholesterol Efflux Assay
Cholesterol content in the BWW medium with or without BSA (3 mg/ ml) and/or SERPINE2 (0.2 mg/ml) was assayed following the protocol described by Roberts et al. [26]. Freshly prepared epididymal spermatozoa (2 x 10 5 cells/ml) was capacitated in 150 µl of BWW medium as described above. After incubation, sperm were centrifuged at 10,000 x g to separately collect the supernatant and sperm pellets.
Samples were mixed with chloroform and methanol in a chloroform-methanol-supernatant (or sperm) final ratio of 2:2:1.8. After vigorous vortexing, the mixture was centrifuged at 600 x g for 5 min, and the organic phase was transferred to a new Eppendorf tube and dried by speed vacuum. The cholesterol content was measured using an Amplex Red cholesterol assay kit (Invitrogen Molecular Probes) according the manufacturer’s instructions. To calculate the cholesterol content
of the samples, a cholesterol standard curve was prepared using the cholesterol reference standard provided with the kit.
2.3 Results
Purification and Identification of SERPINE2 from Mouse SVS
To prepare SERPINE2 for functional analyses and antibody production, we prefractionated SVS by ion exchange and gel filtration chromatography. The possible SERPINE2-containing fraction, based on the molecular mass, was further purified to homogeneity using a heparin Sepharose column (Fig. 1A, peak II), as SERPINE2 is a heparin-binding protein [75]. The purity of the resulting protein was shown with SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1B). To identify this protein, the bands on the gel were excised and digested in-gel with trypsin, and the resulting tryptic peptides were subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. Results showed that the purified protein had significant homology to SERPINE2, with the tryptic peptides matching 41%–43% of the protein sequences (Fig. 1C). The purified SERPINE2 protein showed potent inhibitory activity against PLAU (Fig. 1D), indicating that the purification procedures were not harmful to its protease-inhibitory activity. The SERPINE2 protein concentration in the SVS was estimated to be 0.6–0.8 mg/ml by the ELISA method.
Distribution of SERPINE2 Protein in Adult Male Mouse Reproductive Tissues
To study the tissue distribution of SERPINE2 protein in male reproductive tissues, we examined tissue homogenates, including the seminal vesicle, epididymis, testis, coagulating gland, vas deferens, and prostate, by Western blotting. The antibody against SERPINE2 recognized the purified 45-kDa band and at least three forms, 40-, 42-, and 45-kDa proteins, from thousands of protein components in the tissue extract Fig. 2). In addition, high-molecular-weight proteins were also detected in protein extract from the testes. These proteins may be aggregated forms as no signal was seen when the antiserum was removed from the blots and samples were reprobed with the antiserum that was pretreated with SERPINE2-conjugated beads (control antiserum), indicating the high specificity of the antibody. When protein database searching was conducted using basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) algorithms http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) against a nonredundant database, using the SERPINE2 protein sequence (Swiss-Prot 07235) as the query, three isoforms were revealed, with accession numbers gb j EDL16269.1 j , gb j EDL16267.1 j , and gb j EDL16268.1 j. The theoretical molecular masses of the three isoforms were 30.812, 35.668, and 44.206 kDa, respectively. This was not processed by a signal peptidase.
Thus, the mature protein would have the smaller molecular mass. However, the three
proteins recognized by the anti-SERPINE2 antiserum had greater molecular masses, indicating they might be the glycosylated forms. In fact, SERPINE2 expression was demonstrated as two forms of glycoproteins [76]. However, we treated the protein extract from seminal vesicles with -glycosidase F, only the 45-kDa protein was found to be deglycosylated. To reveal the cell types and subcellular compartments among male reproductive tissues that expressed the SERPINE2 protein, an immunolocalization study was conducted using the specific anti-SERPINE2 antiserum. The SERPINE2 protein was immunolocalized to epithelial cells of seminal vesicles, coagulating glands, vas deferens, and caput or caudal epididymides (Fig. 3, B–E and G). However, when slides were immunostained with control antiserum, no signal was detected (Fig. 3A). Signals on corpus epididymides and the rostate were relatively weaker (Fig. 3, F and H). The most prominent expression was found in the luminal fluid of seminal vesicles of adult mice. A signal on smooth muscle cells of seminal vesicles was also visible (Fig. 3B).
Interestingly, ERPINE2 protein was identified on spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids, Leydig cells, and spermatozoa (Fig. 3I), as revealed by the control slide treated with control antiserum (Fig. 3J).
Binding of the SERPINE2 Protein to Spermatozoa
A visible SERPINE2 protein signal was prominently present on sperm in the
lumen of the vas deferens and caudal epididymides (Fig. 3, D and G). To verify binding of the SERPINE2 protein onto sperm, sperm isolated from testes or epididymides were smeared on slides, as shown in the phasecontrast image for comparison (Fig. 4A, a).
When slides were immunostained by control antiserum and an FITC-conjugated secondary antibody, no fluorescent signal was detected (Fig. 4A, b). In contrast, SERPINE2 was detected on the acrosomal caps of caput, corpus, and caudal epididymal sperm by using the anti-SERPINE2 antiserum (Fig. 4A, c–e). Likewise, apparent SERPINE2 protein signals were also visualized on the acrosomal cap of testicular sperm (Fig. 4A, f). These results suggested that the SERPINE2 protein is an intrinsic surface protein of sperm during spermiogenesis and sperm maturation. Exogenous SERPINE2 can apparently bind to caudal epididymal sperm, as demonstrated by incubation of the epididymal sperm with purified SERPINE2. The signal from this binding was so strong that it was prominently detected by a more-dilute anti-SERPINE2 antiserum (1:1000) (Fig. 4B, b). The binding was strong on the acrosomal cap and on the tails of living epididymal sperm. Under the same detection conditions, epididymal sperm showed only a very faint intrinsic SERPINE2 signal (Fig. 4B, a). Although faint, the intrinsic signal, as mentioned above, was detected using more highly concentrated antiserum (1:100) (Fig. 4A, e). The SERPINE2 protein derived from seminal plasma was also detected on ejaculated and oviductal sperm (Fig. 4C, b and d, respectively) as
demonstrated by control slides stained with control antiserum (Fig. 4C, a and c, respectively). The binding was strong on the acrosomal cap but weaker on the tail.
These findings indicate that the exogenous SERPINE2 may be a sperm surface protein in vivo.
Removal of SERPINE2 from Capacitated Sperm in the Oviduct
To determine whether capacitated or uncapacitated sperm have a SERPINE2-binding zone, oviductal sperm were immunostained with anti-SERPINE2 antiserum, and then the same sperm were fluorescently stained with CTC. As shown in Figure 5, four staining types (Fig. 5, A–D) of sperm were found. Staining type A was defined as capacitated sperm without SERPINE2 on the acrosome; type B was uncapacitated sperm with SERPINE2 on the head; type C was capacitated sperm with less SERPINE2 on the head; and type D was uncapacitated sperm with no SERPINE2 on the sperm surface. About 40% of the SERPINE2-bound sperm were the uncapacitated B type, but only about 10% of the capacitated type C sperm were seen in the oviduct. In addition, about 50% of the sperm in the oviduct were capacitated and not bound by SERPINE2. Interestingly, SERPINE2 was prominently present on uncapacitated sperm. It seems that SERPINE2 was released from the acrosomal region when the sperm underwent capacitation.
Effects of SERPINE2 on Sperm Function In Vitro
To examine the effects of SERPINE2 on epididymal sperm capacitation, we assessed the protein tyrosine phosphorylation pattern of epididymal sperm after incubation with BSA and/or SERPINE2. As shown in Figure 6A, only a few sperm proteins were phosphorylated in control medium without supplementation with BSA or SERPINE2 (Fig. 6A, lane 1). However, BSA induced sperm capacitation accompanied by tyrosine phosphorylation of a group of proteins with a pattern similar to that found in previous studies (Fig. 6A, lane 2) [7]. The SERPINE2 protein prominently decreased the phosphorylation of the control medium (Fig. 6A, lane 3). In addition, the extent of BSA-induced protein tyrosine phosphorylation was successively suppressed by the increased concentration of SERPINE2 (Fig. 6A, lanes 4–7). Clearly, the characteristic capacitation specific protein tyrosine phosphorylation pattern induced by BSA was inhibited by SERPINE2. CTC fluorescence staining is often used to assess capacitation, as judged by the morphology of fluorescently stained sperm. In the control medium without BSA or SERPINE2, sperm showed a spontaneous capacitation rate of approximately 22%. The addition of SERPINE2 significantly decreased the spontaneous capacitation rate to 11%. The population of capacitated sperm remarkably increased (64%) after the control medium was supplemented with 3 mg/ml BSA. However,
SERPINE2 inhibited BSA-induced sperm capacitation significantly after 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mg/ml of SERPINE2 was added to BSA-containing medium (Fig. 6B). These observations are in accordance with the inhibition of BSA-induced tyrosine phosphorylation by SERPINE2 (Fig. 6A). Next, we examined the acrosome reaction induced by the calcium ionophore A23187. A spontaneous acrosome reaction was found (15%–26%) with in vitro-capacitated sperm in the incubation medium with or without BSA and/or SERPINE2 (Fig. 6C, white bars). The concentration of the vehicle used, 0.2% DMSO, did not increase the percentage of acrosome-reacted sperm.
SERPINE2-treated sperm did not show an increased acrosome reaction compared to that of control medium. However, BSA-treated sperm showed remarkable enhancement of the acrosome reaction after A23187 induction. In contrast, the acrosome reaction was significantly inhibited when sperm were incubated with BSA and SERPINE2. An 85%
reduction was observed after treatment with 0.2 mg/ml of SERPINE2 (Fig. 6C). Only capacitated sperm can be induced to undergo an acrosome reaction [16]. Thus, these results further indicated that SERPINE2 is able to inhibit sperm capacitation induced by BSA. Capacitated sperm can bind to the zona pellucida of oocytes and are induced to undergo an acrosome reaction. If SERPINE2 can inhibit sperm capacitation, this would affect sperm–egg binding and subsequent fertilization. As shown in Figure 7, epididymal sperm with no treatment had a low capacity to bind to oocytes, with a
fertilization rate of approximately 20% in vitro, which may have resulted from fertilization by sperm that reacted to acrosome spontaneously. In contrast, BSA-treated sperm showed strong binding to oocytes and had a higher fertilization rate (55%–66%).
However, supplementation with 0.2 mg/ml SERPINE2 significantly reduced oocyte binding and the fertilization rates of BSA-capacitated epididymal spermatozoa by 82%
and 64%, respectively. These findings further demonstrated that SERPINE2 can inhibit BSA-induced sperm capacitation and lead to failure of in vitro fertilization. BSA is used in most media for sperm capacitation. It is able to promote sperm membrane cholesterol efflux [12,77,78]. Cholesterol was released into the medium from BSA-treated sperm, while that release was significantly inhibited by SERPINE2 (Fig. 8A).
SERPINE2-treated sperm retained an amount of cholesterol that was similar to that of untreated sperm (Fig. 8B).
2.4 Discussion
SERPINE2 antiserum, at a dilution of 1:50, had a maximal effect on epididymal sperm capacitation, with a small increase (14%–19%), compared to that in the control group without protein supplementation in the medium, as demonstrated by CTC fluorescence staining and in vitro fertilization, respectively. However, this slight
effect on sperm capacitation was reversed by 0.2 mg/ml SERPINE. A similar effect was found in a study by Ni et al. [28]. The antisera against HongrES1, a caudal epididymis-specific protein, displayed a more significant increase in guinea pig sperm capacitation, and HongrES1 significantly inhibited the effect [28]. In fact, our preliminary data also showed that BSA capacitation of sperm could be reversed by the addition of 0.2 mg/ml SERPINE2, further supporting the role of SERPINE2 as a decapacitation factor.
Cholesterol efflux is one of the initiation events of sperm capacitation. BSA is a cholesterol acceptor, which induces cholesterol efflux, leading to sperm capacitation [12,77,78]. In this study, we revealed that SERPINE2 inhibits BSA-induced cholesterol efflux; the precise mechanism that enables SERPINE2 to retain the cholesterol on the sperm warrants further investigation.
SERPINE2 seems to have protective effects toward sperm cultured in vitro by preventing spontaneous capacitation and the acrosome reaction of sperm. As our study demonstrates, the addition of SERPINE2 effectively lowered protein tyrosine phosphorylation levels (Fig. 6A, lanes 1 and 3), thus yielding a lower percentage of capacitated and acrosome-reacted sperm (Fig. 6, B and C). Additional evidence for this tendency is the fact that in the presence of SERPINE2, there is a reduced number of sperm that bind to an egg and a lower fertilization rate than that of the control medium
group (Fig. 7).
Our SERPINE2 antiserum detected two major and one minor SERPINE2 isoforms in the male reproductive tract. A BLASTP search revealed the existence of three SERPINE2 isoforms in the protein database. Many alternatively spliced SERPINE2 gene products can also be seen at the NCBI AceView website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/). Previous reports have also supported the existence of multiple forms of SERPINE2 protein among mouse tissues [79].
The Serpine2 mRNA and protein are predominantly expressed in seminal vesicles among mouse tissues [69]. The SERPINE2 protein was previously detected in the epithelium of bovine seminal vesicles and epididymides and in Leydig cells of the testes [45]. However, there is no comprehensive study that has specifically detected this protein in all male reproductive tissues. In this study, we found that if paraffin-embedded testicular sections were not treated with the antigen-retrieval solution, then SERPINE2 was immunostained only on Leydig cells. However, if the sections were retrieved to unmask the SERPINE2 antigen, staining was detected on spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids, Leydig cells, and spermatozoa (Fig. 3). This demonstrates the existence of SERPINE2 protein and mRNA in germ cells of adult testes. The Serpine2 mRNA, in fact, exhibits a male-specific expression pattern in
developing gonads, suggesting its involvement in a testis-determining pathway [80].
Plasminogen activators and their cognate inhibitors, including SERPINE1, SERPINE2, SERPINB2, and SERPINA5, are all found in mouse testes. The level of Serpina5 mRNA is the highest among them, followed by, respectively, Serpine2,
Serpinb2, and Serpine1 mRNA levels [81]. However, murine testicular SERPINE2
seems to have more extensive localization than SERPINA5, as the latter is detected only in Leydig cells before birth and postnatally but is restricted to early spermatids within the acrosomal region in adult testes [82]. SERPINE2 and SERPINA5 are both members of the SERPIN family. Their gene expression levels are regulated by androgen [70,71], but they seem to work as counterparts in different species. A comprehensive proteomic study detected only the SERPINA5 protein but not the SERPINE2 protein in human seminal plasma [83]. However, only minor amounts of Serpina5 mRNA were found in other accessory glands of mouse reproductive tissues, although it was prominently expressed in testes. SERPINE2 was expressed predominantly in the SVS (Fig. 3) and contributes to mouse seminal plasma. SERPINE2 would be the major plasminogen activator inhibitor in murine seminal plasma. Interestingly, they are all sperm surface-binding proteins. SERPINA5 binds to human sperm and may influence sperm–oocyte interactions [84], while SERPINE2 binds to mouse sperm and modulates sperm capacitation (Figs. 6–8). Interestingly, like SERPINE2, PDC-109 is also a
heparin-binding protein [85].
Some protease inhibitors are found on the sperm surface. SERPINA5 is present on the acrosomal surface of human sperm and has been suggested to prevent sperm from prematurely undergoing an acrosomal reaction [84]. SPINK3 was shown to exist on the acrosomal cap of murine sperm and is able to inhibit Ca2+ uptake by epididymal sperm [35]. A proteinase inhibitor of seminal vesicle origin was shown to block sperm–zona binding and the acrosome reaction [86]. In addition, SPINKL, found mainly on the midpiece, is able to inhibit sperm capacitation [37]. In this study, we showed that SERPINE2, another sperm acrosome-binding protein, also exhibits the ability to inhibit sperm capacitation in vitro. Interestingly, these proteins are all predominantly expressed in seminal vesicles.
SERPINE2 may be like PEBP1 in that it has the dual functions of serving as a decapacitation factor [25] and a serine protease inhibitor [87]. HongrES1, another SERPIN family protein, also displayed similar functions [28,29]. The inhibitory activity of a serine protease inhibitor and its role as a decapacitation factor might not necessarily be related. SPINKL inhibits sperm capacitation but does not seem to have inhibitory activities against serine proteases [37]. SPINK3 has no effects on sperm capacitation [88] while exhibiting trypsin inhibitory activity.
Glycosaminoglycans, including heparin, are moieties of the ECM. Sperm were
found to possess a surface sialic acid moiety [89], which is an anionic glycan residue like heparin. Thus, the binding of SERPINA5 and SERPINE2 to sperm may be like the case of protein binding to the ECM to protect sperm from protease attack in the testes and the epididymis during sperm maturation or in the female reproductive tract during transit toward fertilization. Whether they bind to sperm via sialic acid binding awaits further investigation.
2.5 Conclusion
We have demonstrated that SERPINE2 is expressed in nearly all of the male reproductive tissues examined, with the largest amount in seminal vesicles. SERPINE2 is intrinsically bound to the plasma membrane overlying the acrosome, while more SERPINE2 proteins derived from the seminal plasma were heavily bound to ejaculated and oviductal sperm in vivo. Nevertheless, SERPINE2 was predominantly detected on uncapacitated sperm, indicating that SERPINE2 is lost during the process of sperm capacitation. Furthermore, supplementation with purified SERPINE2 protein effectively suppressed BSA-induced sperm capacitation in vitro and blocked sperm–oocyte interactions, suggesting that the SERPINE2 protein may play a role as a sperm decapacitation factor. Our study has also demonstrated that SERPINE2 interferes with
the capacitation related signal transduction machinery by inhibiting cholesterol efflux of sperm. Further studies are warranted to elucidate its other possible mechanisms associated with sperm capacitation.
2.6 Figures
FIG. 1. Purification of SERPINE2 from mouse SVS. A) Resolution of peak II fraction from a Sephadex G-75 gel filtration column (see Materials and Methods) by affinity chromatography with a heparin-Sepharose CL 6B column is shown. B) Several fractions were resolved by 15% SDS-PAGE. Fraction numbers (Fr. no.) 30 to 35, purified SERPINE2, were collected and used as immunogen for antibody production. C) The cDNA-deduced amino acid sequences of mouse SERPINE2 are shown. The matched tryptic peptides found in the LC-MS/MS analyses are underlined and in boldface type.
D) The inhibitory activity of SERPINE2 toward plasminogen activators.
FIG. 2. Tissue distribution and antibody specificity. Total protein (100μg) prepared from the homogenates of each sexual tissue, except for 10μg from the seminal vesicle, was analyzed by Western blotting. Purified SERPINE2 (20 ng) was loaded as a positive control (lane 1). Lanes 2, testes; 3, epididymides; 4, vas deferens; 5, seminal vesicles; 6, prostate; 7, coagulating glands.
FIG. 3. Immunolocalization of SERPINE2 in male accessory reproductive tissues.
Tissue slices from male accessory reproductive tissues, including the seminal vesicle (A and B), coagulating gland (C), vas deferens (D), caput (E), corpus (F), caudal (G) epididymis, prostate (H), and testes (I and J), were incubated with anti-SERPINE2 antiserum (B–I), or antiserum was pretreated with SERPINE2-conjugated beads for the control (A and J) and then treated with biotin-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG and HRP-conjugated streptavidin (red). For contrast, specimens were further stained with hematoxylin (blue). Photomicrographs were taken under bright-field illumination. Bar = 200 μm. Tissue: e, epithelium; l, lumen; m, muscle; le, Leydig cell.
FIG. 4. Demonstration of the binding of SERPINE2 to sperm. A) Intrinsic SERPINE2 binding: sperm collected from the caput, corpus, and caudal epididymis, and testes were smeared on slides for immunolocalization of SERPINE2 on sperm. Slides were incubated with control antiserum (panel b) or anti-SERPINE2 antiserum (panels c–f) at a dilution of 1:100 and then treated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and counterstained with Hoechst dye to localize the nuclei for contrast. Phase-contrast photomicrography of sperm isolated from a caput epididymis reveals sperm morphology (panel a). SERPINE2 protein was detected on the acrosomal region of the caput epididymis sperm (panel c), corpus epididymis sperm (panel d), caudal epididymis sperm (panel e), and testicular sperm (panel f). Bar = 10μm. B) Exogenous SERPINE2 binding: living epididymal sperm incubated with ( + , panel b) or without ( - , panel a) purified SERPINE2. After unbound SERPINE2 was washed away, epididymal sperm were fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in the tube and then
binding of SERPINE2 derived from seminal plasma, were fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in the tube and then transferred onto slides (panel b). Oviductal sperm (panels c and d) flushed from the oviduct were directly fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde on the slides. For immunolocalization of SERPINE2 on sperm, slides were incubated with anti-SERPINE2 antiserum (B, panel b, and C, panels b and d) or control antiserum (B, panel a, and C, panels a and c) at a dilution of 1:1000 and were immunostained as described above. Bar = 10 μm.
FIG. 5. Staining patterns of sperm in the oviduct. Sperm flushed from the oviduct were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde and immunostained with anti-SERPINE2 antiserum and TRITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. Sperm were subsequently stained using a CTC fluorescence assay. Capacitated (A and C) and uncapacitated (B and D) sperm were observed under fluorescence microscopy. White arrowheads indicate the staining signal of capacitated sperm, while arrows show the SERPINE2 staining signal.
Graph bars show percentages of sperm appearing under four different forms, type A to D. A random sample of 200 sperm per mouse was evaluated, and 9 mice were used in this experiment. Data are means ± SD of nine independent experiments. Bar = 5μm.
FIG. 6. Effects of SPERINE2 on murine sperm capacitation. Epididymal spermatozoa were incubated in the presence of 3 mg/ml BSA and/or different concentrations of SERPINE2 at 37℃ for 90 min. After treatment, the soluble fraction of the sperm lysate was resolved by SDS-PAGE, electrotransferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane, and immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (A), or sperm smeared on slides were analyzed by CTC fluorescence staining to score the population of capacitated sperm (B); otherwise, the sperm acrosome reaction induced by the calcium ionophore A23187 (C, black bars) or uninduced (C, white bars) was evaluated by PNA staining (C). A minimum of 200 sperm per trial was evaluated. Data are means ± SD of three independent experiments. a, significant difference compared to the BSA-only group (P
< 0.001); b, significant difference compared to the medium without protein supplementation (P < 0.001).
FIG. 7. Influence of SERPINE2 on sperm–egg interactions. Epididymal spermatozoa were capacitated in BWW medium with BSA and/or SERPINE2 for 90 min and subsequently inseminated with cumulus-intact oocytes for 30 min. Oocytes were gently transferred using a mouth pipette, and we waited 5 min to remove loosely attached sperm from the eggs. Numbers of tightly bound sperm per oocyte were counted (A).
Otherwise, treated sperm were inseminated for 6 h to evaluate fertilization (B).
Fertilized eggs that showed two pronuclei were identified by Hoechst 33258 staining.
Data are means ± SD from four independent experiments. a, Significant difference compared relative to medium supplemented with BSA (P < 0.001).
FIG. 8. Effect of SERPINE2 on BSA-induced cholesterol removal from capacitated sperm. Epididymal spermatozoa were capacitated in medium with BSA and/or SERPINE2 for 90 min. Cholesterol was extracted from the medium (A) and sperm (B).
Data are means ± SD from four independent experiments. a, Significant difference compared to medium supplemented with BSA (P < 0.01).
Chapter 3
Study II: Involvement of the Serine Protease Inhibitor, SERPINE2, and the Urokinase Plasminogen Activator in Cumulus Expansion and Oocyte maturation
3.1 Introduction
During ovulation, SERPINE2 and PLAU expression is coordinated in mice [46], whereas SERPINE1 and PLAT expression is coordinated in monkeys and rats [90-92].
This indicates that the PA system has species-specific expression patterns in the ovary.
PA expression levels are upregulated in cumulus cells just before ovulation [93] and are involved in follicle wall rupture during ovulation [38,47,48,69]. PAs and their cognate serpin inhibitors have been detected in cumulus cells [46]; however, their involvement in oocyte maturation during pre-ovulation needs clarification. Several studies have reported cumulus expansion is essential for oocyte maturation. Many cumulus proteins are required for regulating cumulus structure and cumulus expansion, such as
Hyaluronan synthase 2 (Has2), PTX3, Versican (Vcan) and Tnfaip6. In study II, higher
SERPINE2 expression levels were detected in cumulus cells of human immature oocytes than in those of mature oocytes. Therefore, we here assumed that highSERPINE2 levels were correlated with cumulus expansion and oocyte immaturity. To verify this, we used mouse cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) as a model for evaluating the association of SERPINE2 levels with cumulus expansion and subsequent oocyte maturation.
3.2 Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Mackay Memorial Hospital Institutional Review Board (reference number 09MMHIS024) with written consent for the use of human cumulus cells. Written consent for the use of cumulus cells was obtained from 20 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. All animals contributed to this study were maintained in the Animal Center at the Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital. The animal use protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Mackay Memorial Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee with an approval number MMH-A-S-100-45. All efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Collection of human cumulus cells
Reproductive Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan received controlled ovarian hyperstimulation by application of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. COCs from follicles >14 mm were collected using transvaginal ultrasound and a 16-gauge needle and were exposed to 80 IU hyaluronidase in Quinn's Advantage Fertilization medium (Sage BioPharma, Bedminster, NJ) for 20 s at 37°C to dissolve hyaluronan. Of the 46 COCs, 26 and 20 had mature and immature oocytes, respectively. The cumulus cells were individually separated from the COCs under an Olympus SZX7 stereomicroscope (Tokyo, Japan). They were mixed with 20 µl of extraction buffer from the Arcturus PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) for total RNA isolation and stored at −80°C until use. Cumulus cells individually collected from 10 other COCs were fixed on slides using 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde for immunohistochemical staining.
Collection of mouse cumulus cells
The mice (age, 21–24 days) were injected with 5 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and sacrificed by cervical dislocation after 46 h. The ovaries were removed and briefly rinsed with PBS. COCs were isolated by puncturing antral follicles with a 30-gauge needle under an Olympus SZX7 stereomicroscope. To study the effect of luteinizing hormone on Serpine2 and