1.Adams, J.S.(1965), Inequity in Social Exchange,In L.Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology,2 ,pp.267-299, New York : Academic.
2.Adams, J.S.(1968), Effects of overpayment : Two comments on Lawer's paper, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,10,pp.315-316.
3.Adams, J.S., and Freedman, S.(1976), Equity theory revisited : Comments and annotated bibliography, In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster(Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology,Vol.9,pp.43-90 ,New York: Academic.
4. Adele Iannantuono and Eyles John(1999), Environmental health metanarratives : an analysis of policy making in Ontario, Canada,Health & Place 5,pp.139-156.
5.Anderson, N.H.(1968), Application of linear-searial model to a personality impression task using serial presentation,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,10,pp.354-362.
6.Anderson, N.H.(1973), Information integration theory applied to attitudes about U.S. president,Journal of Educational Psychology,64,pp.1-8.
7.Anderson, N. H.(1974), Cognitive algebra: Integration theory applied to social attribution, In L. Berkowitz(eds), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.7,pp.1-101,New York: Academic.
8.Anderson, N.H.(1976a), Equity judgements as information integration, Journal of Personility and Social Psychology,33,pp.291-299.
9.Anderson, N.H.(1976b), Social perception and cognition(Tech.Rep.CHIO 62). La Jolla, CA : Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego.
10.Anderson, N.H.(1981), Foundations of Information Integration theory, New York: Academic Press.
11.Anderson, N.H.(1982), Methods of Information Integration theory,New York:
Academic Press.
12.Anderson, N.H.(1983), Ratio models of equity and inequity: Comment on Mellers, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112,pp.513-515.
13.Anderson, N.H.(1986), A Cognitive Theory of Judgment and Decision,in B.
Brehmer,H.Judgment, P. Lourens, and G.,Sevon(eds.),New direction in research on Decision Making, North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
14.Anderson, N.H.(eds.)(1991), Contributions of Information Integration Theory:
Vol I, Cognition , Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
15.Anderson, N.H.(1996), A Functional Theory of Cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
16.Anderson, N.H. and Butzin, C.A.(1974), Performance = Motivation × Ability:
An Integration Theoretical Analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30.
17.Anderson, N.H. and Butzin, C.A.(1978), Integration theory applied to children’s judgements of equity, Developmental Psychology,14,pp.593-606.
18.Anderson, N.H. and Farkas, A.J.(1975), Integration theory applied to models of inequity,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1, pp.588-591.
19.Andrews, I.R.and Valenzi, E.R.(1970), Overpayment inequity or self-image as a worker, A critical examination of an experimental induction procedure, Organizational Behavior and Hunan Performance,5, pp.266-276.
20.Berndt Brehmer and Jotee C.R.B.(1988), Human Judgment-The SJT View, Elsevier Science Publishing Company,INC.
21.Cardy, R. L. and Dobbins, G. H.(1994), Performance Appraisal Alternative Perspectives, Cincinnati, OH: South Western Publishing Co.
22.Carr Gale L.(1995), Environmental equity: Does it play a role in WTE siting ? Journal of Hazardous Material 47,pp.303-312.
23.Dunn, W.N.(1994), Public Policy Analysis: an Introduction, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
24.Edwards, W.（1961）, Behavioral Decision Theory, Annual Review of Psychology, 12, pp.31-50.
25.Farkas, A.J.(1976), Test of an unfairness model with a patient population (Unpublished experiment), La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego.
26.Farkas, A.J. and Andersion. N.H.(1974), Input summation and equity summation in multi-cue equity judgements (Tech. Rep. CHIP 47), La Jolla, CA : Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego.
27.Farkas, A.J. and Anderson, N. H.(1979), Multidimensional input in equity theory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, pp. 879-896.
28.Farkas, A.J., Sheposh J.P. and Monda, M.(1981), Input-outcome relevance of input dimension of effort and accomplishment for outcome dimensions of praise and money,San Diego,CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
29.Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S.（1978）, How safe is safe enough ? A Psychological Study of Attitude towards Technological Risks and Benefits.
Policy Science, 9, pp.127-152.
30.Friedman, M.(1962), Capitalism and Freedom,Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.GAO.(1993), Government Performance and Result Act.
32.Gilligan, R. Wark and Dennis L. Krebs（2000）, The Construction of Dilemmas in Everyday Life, Journal of Moral Education, Vol.29, No1.
33.Griffin, James (1996), Value Judgement : Improving our Ethical Beliefs, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
34.Hall Mary-Jo.(2002), Aligning the Organization to Increase Performance Result, The Public Manager: Summer, pp.7-15.
35.Hammond, K.R., McAlellanf, G.H. and Mumpover, J.（1980）, Human Judgement and Decision Making： Theories, Methods and Procedures. New York: Praeger Publication.
36.Hammond, K.R., Stewart, T.R., Brehmer B. and Steinmann, D.(1975), Social judgement theory, In M. Kaplan & S. Schwartz(eds), Human Judgement and Decision Process, New York: Academic Press.
37.Hans, De Geer（1992）, The Rise and Fall of the Swedish Model Chichester, West Sussex: Garden Publication.
38.Harris,E., Videa, E. and Perez, L., et al (2001), Clinical, epidemiologic, and virologic features of dengue in the 1999 epidemic in Nicaragua, Am J Trop Med Hyg 2000; 63, pp.5-11.
39.Harris, R.J.(1983), Pinning down the equity formula, In D. M. Messick & K.
S. Cook(Eds.), Equity theory, pp.207-241, New York: Praeger.
40.Hatry, H.P.(1999), Performance Measurement: Getting Results, Washington D.C.:
The Urban Institute Press.
41.Hite, Diane (2000), A Random Utility Model of Environmental Equity, Growth
& Change, Winter 2000, Vol.31 Issue 1, p40,19p,7 charts,1 Graph.
42.Homans, G.C. (1961), Socil behavior : Its elementary forms, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
43.Ingelhart, R.(1990), Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
44.Johnson, N.(1990), Reconstructing the Welfare State: a decade of change 1980-1990, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
45.John Rohrbaugh and Gary McClelland (1980), Measuring the Relative Importance of Utilitarian and Egalitarian Values : A Study of Individual Differences About Fair Distribution, Journal of Applied Psychology: Vol,65, pp34-49.
46.John Rohrbaugh and Gary McClelland (1980), Measuring the Relative Importance of Utilitarian and Egalitarian Values : A Study of Individual Differences About Fair Distribution, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65,No.1,pp.34-49.
47.Kettl Donald K.(1998), Reinventing Government: A Fifth-Year Report Card, Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
48.Kenneth, R., Gary, H. McClelland and Jeryl Mumpower(1980), Human Judgment and Decision Making-Theories, Methods and Procedures, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
49.Marmor, Theodore and Maslow Jerry L.(1992), American's Misunderstood Welfare State: Myths and Realities, Governance 5:4, pp.493-507.
50.Mellers, B.A.(1982), Equity judgement: A revision of Aristotelian views, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gernal,111, pp.242-270.
51.Mellers, B.A.(1985), A reconsideration of two-person inequity judgement: A reply to Anderson,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gernal,114, pp.514-520.
52.Mitchell Deborah (1992), Welfare State and Welfare Outcomes in the 1980s ,International Social Security Review, 45, pp.73-90.
53.Moller David (1991), The Nation That Tried to Buy Happiness, Reader's Digest,Sept, pp.34-38.
54.Moore, M.H.(1995), Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, President and Fellows of Harvard College.
55.Nozicks Robert (1988), Anarchy, State and Utopia(reprinted), Oxford, Uk : Basil Blackwell.
56.Patchen, M.(1961), The choice of wage ,Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
57.Powell, G. and Bingham, Jr.(1986), American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective, American Political Science Review, 80,1, pp.17-43.
58.Radin, B.A.(1998), The Government Performance and Results Act: Hydra-Headed Monster or Flexible Management Tool, Public Adminustration Review, 58(4):
pp.307-316.
59.Rawls John(1985), Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical, Philosphy and Public Affairs 14.
60.Rawls John(1999), A Theory of Justice, 2th ed, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap of Harvard University Press.
61.Reams Margaret A. and Templet Paul H.(1996), Political and environmental equity issues related to municipal waste incineration siting, Journal of Hazardous Materials 47, pp.313-323.
62.River, N. and Tedeschi, J.T.(1976), Public versus Private Reactions to Positive Inequity, Journal of Personality and Social psychology 34, pp.
895-900.
63.Sandel, Michael.(1982), Liberalism and the Limit of Justice, New York : Cambridge University Press.
64.Shanteau, J.（1984）, Functional Measurement Number One Manual for Program FM#1. Manhattan: Kansas State University.
65.Sayles, L.R .(1958), Behvior of industrial work groups: Prediction and Control, New York: Wiley.
66.Schmitt, Manfred(1995), Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice(SBI), Person.indicid.Diff, Vol 21,No 1, pp.3-20.
67.Schumpeter J.A.(1954), History of Economic Analysis, edited by Schumpeter, E. B., Oxford University Press.
68.Scott Farrow(1997), Environmental equity and sustainability: rejecting the Kaldor-Hicks criteria, Ecological Economics 27,pp.183-188.
69.Slovic, Paul, and Sarah Lichtenstein(1971), Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment, Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 6, pp.649-744.
70.Stewart, T.R.,Joyce, C.R.B., and Lindell, M.K.(1975), New Analyses:
Application of Judgment Theory to Physicians＇ Judgments of Drug Effects, In K. R. Hammond and C. R. B. Joyce (eds.), Psychoactive Drugs and Social Judgment:
Theory and Research, New York: Wiley.
71.Stiglitz Joseph E.(1999), Economic of Public Sector, W. W. Norton & Company, New York/London.
72.Throutman, C.M. and Shanteau, J.（1976）, Do Consumers Evaluate Products by Adding or Averaging Attribute Information ? Journal of Consumer of Research, 3, pp.101-106.
73.Tobin, J.(1970), On Limiting the Domain of Inequality, Journal of Law and Economics 13, pp.263-277.
74.Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.(1973), Availability Ahearustic for judgement freqency and probability, Cognitive Psychology, 4, pp.207-22.
75.Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.(1981), The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, 211, pp.453-458.
76.Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.(1982), Judgement under ucertainty： Heuristics and biases, Cambridge：Cambridge University Press.
77.Varian, H. R.(1990), Equity, Envy and Efficiency, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.9, pp.63-91.
78.Vojovic (1995), Intergenerational and Intragenerational Equity Requirements for Sustainability,Environmental Conservation,Vol.22,No.3,Autumn,pp.223-9.
79.Walster, E., Walster, G. W. and Berscheid, E.(1978), Equity: Theory and research, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
80.Wang, M.S.(1987), Addition of A Cognitive Dimension to the Analytical Hierarchy Process-A Land Use Decision-Making Example, Dissertation, the School of public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bollmington.
81.Wang, M.S., J. K. Fang and W. M. Bowen (2000), An Integrated Schema for Environmental Management in Developing Countries, Environmental Management, 25, 5, pp.463-476, Springer-Veriag, New York.
82.Williams, S. Mitchell(1999), Voluntary Environmental and Social Accounting Disclosure Practices in the Asia-Pacific Region: An International Empirical Test of Political Economy Theory, The International Journal of Accounting ,Vol.34, No.2, pp.209-238.