第五章 結論與後續研究
5.4 未來研究建議
以下是幾點基於前述探討所衍伸出來的具體建議，可供未來研究作為參考：
1.討論慣用媒材對設計者本身而言所具備的必要性。慣用媒材顯示出不同、相對的使用程度，
表示設計者的慣用傾向可能明顯、也可能不明顯、甚至幾乎沒有，因此我們亦可對慣用媒材 的存在加以討論。
2.擬定慣用與否為前提的實驗衡量與評斷用標準或依據。本研究的整體主軸與概念是基於數位 媒材能否支持設計者思考而來的，而研究結果也發現，慣用與否對設計過程/實驗結果的確 會造成一定的影響，此意味著媒材的相關研究在進行受測者的選擇時會需要一種可衡量媒材 的使用是否相當的標準或依據，以益於釐清、區分與產生不同面向的研究結果。
3.發展適合用來探討慣用與否這一類議題的實驗分析方法。本研究所發展的實驗分析方式的確 是相當耗時而費工的，基於分析方式是否能有效呈現出相應的現象與結果而言，發展一個合 適此類議題的分析方法是具有其必要性的。
4.慣用、善用、擅用、合適性等概念的相互釐清。本論文基本上屬於初探性質，前述幾個名詞 實因推導而出現，其之間的分別僅在前文中約略被提及，作者並未在後續詳加澄清並納入討 論中乃因其並非本文重點，但其實其間的區分也許有助於對慣用的進一步探討，故納入未來 研究的建議之中。
數位媒材應用研究和傳統媒材研究(設計行為，媒材特性)等的先前研究談的是較為概略且一般的 現象，而本研究是開始從慣用媒材此一特定角度切入媒材研究，探討有關媒材使用的現象及其背 後成因，是為一種應用行為研究。應用研究已漸趨成熟，先前研究也具備相當成果，但在應用研 究和媒材研究之間的交集尚未進一步重新接觸、並審視其核心議題─如何增加(或引發)設計師的 創造力。
不同操作概念的媒材即屬不同種類的媒材，因此在傳統類媒材以及數位類媒材的大項下尚可細分 出多種媒材。媒材具有自己本身獨有的特性和概念，能夠影響人形成不同的設計思維，因此具有 改變原有思維、思維多樣性、以及增加思考刺激的可能性。從這種觀點下去看，若將數位媒材以
傳統媒材為基準作改進，對已漸漸熟悉和使用數位輸入方式(滑鼠、鍵盤)的使用者反而需要適應 新的改變，且使數位媒材與傳統媒材的相異度降低，甚至演變成為同種媒材，僅在功能與取用上 相異，但未能有效更新或衍生出不同的操作概念。因此若要達到使用上的普及與便利，媒材的本 身進化即會有效降低門檻與增加因應的需要，到某一程度其易於上手和有效率的表現將能大為降 低使用的排斥性與提高接受度/好感度，因為人具有適應和習慣的傾向；值得注意的是，在現代 數位類用品的普遍使用下，所帶出來的亦是使用習慣的改變與多元，此將影響媒材應用行為的思 考方向。也許不再是勉強此類媒材模仿他種媒材，而是應該探討和瞭解何為更為符合當下使用者 的直覺使用與行為習慣。
媒材的慣用可以預測新媒材最後存留普及者會變成日常甚至於傳統的一部分，而且有趣的新概念 應用媒材初期可以激發人的想像與思考。發展新概念應用媒材，也許是刺激創意思考的方向之一。
參考文獻
Abadi, A. I. (1996). Effectiveness Of Models, Full-Scale Modeling in the Age of Virtual Reality. 6th EFA-Conference.
Abdelhameed, W. (2004). Visual design thinking in the design process as impacted by digital media, Digital Design Tools, 1, 90-94.
AIGA & Cheskin (2010). An Ethnography Primer. Be part of an ongoing series, produced by AIGA, on the evolution of design. Website: www.aiga.org
Akin, Ö. (1978). How do architects design? In Unknown Latombe (eds), Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition in Computer Aided Design, North Holland Publishing Company, IFIP.
Akin, Ö. (1993). Architects' reasoning with structures and functions. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 273-294.
Akin, Ö. & Lin, C. C. (1996). Design protocol data and novel design decision. In Cross, N., Christiaans, H. & Dorst, K. (Eds.), Analysing design activity, Wiley, Chichester, 35-62.
Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishing. **
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G.H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
Archer,L. B.(1965). Systematic Methods for Designers. Council of Industrial Design, London.
Asimow, M. (1962). Introduction to Design. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bilda, Z., & Demirkan, H. (2003).An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media.
Design Studies , 24(1), 27-50.
Bilda, Z., Demirkan, H., & Erkip, F. (2000). Traditional versus digital design medium: A case study in the interior design studio. Unpublished manuscript, Bilkent University, Bilkent, Ankara,Turkey.
Bilda, Z. & Gero, J. S. (2006). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies, 27(5), 587-613.
Blount G. N. & Clarke, S. (1994). Artificial Intelligence and Design Automation Systems. Journal of Engineering Design, 5(4), 299 – 314.
Bolger, N., Davis, A. & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
Breen, J., Nottrot, R. & Stellingwerff, M. (2003). Tangible virtuality- perceptions. of computer-aided and physical modeling. Automation in Construction, 12, 649-653.
Chang, C.-T. (2005). Some phenomena of touch in study model. Computer Aided Architectural Design in Asia (CAADRIA). New Delhi, India. 277-287.
Chen, S. C. (2001). The Role of Design Creativity in Computer Media. The 19th eCAADe conference, Helsinki, Finland.
Cross, N. (1996). Creativity in Design: Not Leaping but Bridging. in L. Candy and E. Edmonds (eds) Creativity and Cognition 1996: proceedings of the Second International Symposium LUTCHI, Loughborough.
Cross, N. (1999). Natural Intelligence in Design. Design Studies, 20(1), 25-39.
Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag.
Daru, R. and Snijder, H.P.S. (1996). Morphogenetic Designing in Architecture resolving controversies in and between design, research and development. Timmermans, Harry (Ed.), Third Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning - Part one: Architecture Proceedings (Spa, Belgium), August 18-21.
Dorst, K. (1995). Analysing design activity: new directions in protocol analysis. Design Studies, 16(2), 139-142.
Dorst, K. (1996). The design problem and its structure. In Cross, N., Christiaans, H. & Dorst, K. (Eds.), Analysing design activity, Wiley, Chichester, 17-34.
Dorst, K. & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies, 16(2), 261-274.
Eisentraut, R. & Gunther, J. (1997). Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process. Design Studies, 18(4), 369-383.
Elsas, P. A. & Vergeest, J. S. M. (1998). New functionality for computer- aided conceptual design: the displacement feature. Design Studies, 19(1), 81-102.
Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M.T. (2003). Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook. (Chinese Translation of Eysenck &
Keane 4th Edition). : Wu-Nan Book Co.: Taipei, Taiwan.
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M.T. (2000/2005). Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook (4th ed. / 5th ed.). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.*
Farah, M. J., Hammond, K. M., Levine, D. N., & Calvanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental imagery: Dissociable systems of representation. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 439-462.
Faruque, O. (1984). Graphic communication as a design tool. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Finke, R. A. (1989). Principles of Mental Imagery. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fraser, I. & Henmi, R. (1994). Envisioning Architecture: An Analysis of Drawing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Gero, J. S. (1995). Computer and creative design, CAADFuture, Australia.
Gero, J. S. & NeillKey, T. M. (1998). An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies 19(15), 21-61.
Gleitman, H. (1997). Psychology(3rd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. (《 心 理 學 》， 洪 蘭 譯 ； 台 北 市 ： 遠 流 。 )
Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, G. (1989). Problem representation versus domain of solution in architectural design teaching, J. Archit.
Plann. Res. 6(3), 204–215.
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Res. J. 4, 123–143.
Goldschmidt, G. (1992). Serial sketching: visual problem solving in designing. Cybemetics Syst.: Int. J. 23, 191–219.
Goldschmidt, G. (1994). On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies, 15(2), 158–174.
Goldschmidt, G. (1995). Visual displays for design: imagery, analogy and databases of visual images. Visual Databases in Architecture: Recent Advances in Design and Decision-making, 53–76.
Gross, M. D. (1996). The Electronic Cocktail Napkin-a computational environment for working with design diagrams.
Design Studies, 17(1), 53-69.
Gross, M. D. & Do, E. Y.-L. (1996). Ambiguous intentions: a paper-like interface for creative design. Proceeding ACM
Conference on User Interface Software Technology, Seattle, 183-192.
Hanna, R. & Barber, T. (2001). An inquiry into computers in design: attitudes before-attitudes after. Design Studies, 22(3), 255-281.
Harrison, A. (1978). Making and Thinking: A Study of Intelligent Activities. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Herbert, D. M. (1988). Study drawings in architectural design: their properties as a graphic medium. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(2), 26-38.
Herbert, D. M. (1993). Architectural study drawing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Hohauser, S. (1970). Architectural and Interior Models: Design and Construction. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
IDEO (2003). IDEO Method Cards: 51 Ways to Inspire Design (Cards). William Stout.
Kalay, Y. E. (2004). Architecture's new media: principles, theories, and methods of computer-aided design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kavakli, M. et al. (1999). Sketching interpretation in novice and expert designers. In Gero, J. S. and Tversky, B. (eds), Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 209-220.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the image debate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Reiser, B. J., Farah, M. J., & Fliegel, S. L. (1983). Generating visual images: units and relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. Jun, 112(2), 278-303.
Kris, E. (1944). Art and Regression. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 6, 236-250.
Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Landay, J.A. (1996). SILK: Sketching Interfaces Like Krazy. Human Factors in Computing, CHI’96.
Landay, J.A. & Myers, B. A. (1995). Interactive Sketching for Early Stages of User Interface Design. Proceedings of CHI'95 , 43-50.
Lansdown, J. (1987). The creative aspects of CAD: a possible approach. Design Studies, 8(2), 76-81.
Laseau, P. (2001). Graphic Thinking for Architects & Designers(3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Lawson, B. (1994). Design in mind. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
Lim, C. K. (2003). Is a pen-based system just another pen or more than a pen? In Digital Design. eds. W. Dokonal, and U.
Hirschberg, 615–622. Graz: eCAADe and Graz University of Technology.
Lin, C. Y. (1999). The representing capacity of physical models and digital models. Proceeding of The Fourth
International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, 53-62.
Lindsey, B. (2001). Digital Gehry: Material Resistance, Digital Construction. Birkhäuser Basel.
Liu, Y. T. (1994). Encoding explicit and implicit emergent subshapes based on empirical findings about human vision. In Artificial Intelligence in Design, eds. J. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks, 401-418. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Liu, Y. T. (1996). Understanding architecture in the computer era. Taipei: Hu's.（中文版：建築的涵意：認識建築．體驗建築．
並瞭解建築設計、胡氏圖書）
Liu, Y. T. (2000). Digital architecture? Digitality of architecture. In Y. T. Liu (ed.) Defining Digital Architecture: 2000 FEIDAD Award, 6-12. Taipei: Dialogue.
Liu, Y. T. & P. Eisenman. (2001). Emergence of Digital Architecture. Hu’s, Taipei.
Lloyd, P., Lawson, B. & Scott, P. (1995). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?, Design Studies, 16, 237-259.
Lloyd, P. & Scott, P. (1995). Difference in similarity: interpreting the architectural design process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Desig., 22(4), 383–406.
Mariampolski, H. (2006). Ethnography for marketers: a guide to consumer immersion. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Marx, J. (2000). A proposal for alternative methods for teaching digital design. Automation in Construction, 9, 19-35.
Millman, D. (2007). How to think like a great graphic designer. Allworth Press.（中文版：像設計大師一樣思考、林育如譯、
2009、商周）
Mitchell, W. J. (1988). Online Design: The Accessibility and Inevitability of Computer-Aided Design in Architecture.
Inland Architecture, 32(6), 46-51.
Mitchell, W. J. (1992). The Logic of Architecture- Design, Computation, and Cognition (3rd ed.). Cambridge. MA: The MIT Press. Massachusette.（中文版：建築的設計思考─設計，運算，與認知、劉育東譯、1995、胡氏圖書）
Mitchell, W. J. & McCullough, M. (1991). Digital Design Media. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Munari, B. (1981). Da Cose Nasce Cose. Roma-Bari, Editori Laterza.（中文版：物生物_現代設計理念、曾堉，洪進丁譯、1989、
博遠出版社）
Neiman, B. et al. (1999). Sketches and Their Functions in Early Design – A Retrospective Analysis of a Pavilion House. 4th Design Thinking Research Symposium, Cambridge MA.
Neto, P. L. (2001). Evaluation of an urban design project: imagery and realistic computer models. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 671-686.
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A., (1957). Elements of a Theory of Problem Solving. Rand Corporation Report P-971, March.
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A., (1967). The process of creative thinking. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking, New York: Atherton Press.
Oxman, R. (2000). Design Media for the Cognitive Designer. Automation and Construction, 9(4), 337-346.
Paivio, A., Yuille J. C., & Madigan S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Jan, 76(1), Suppl: 1-25.
Peña, W. (1987). Problem Seeking: An Architectural Programming Primer (3rd ed.). AIA Press, New York.
Poter, T. & Neale, J. (2000). Architectural supermodels : physical design simulation. Boston, MA : Architectural Press.
Purcell, A. T. & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process. Design Studies, 19(4), 389-430.
Reber, A. S. (1985). Dictionary of Psychology. London: Penguin Books.
Robbins, E. (1994). Why Architects Draw. Cambridge. MA: The MIT Press.
Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design Thinking. Cambridge. MA: The MIT Press. Massachusette.（中文版：設計思考、王昭仁譯、1999、
建築情報）
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP research group (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
Ryle, G. (1949). On knowing how and knowing that. In The Concept of Mind. London: Hutcheson.
Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135–156.
Schön, D.A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131-147.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. New York, NY: Basic Books. （中文 版：反映的實踐者－專業工作者如何在行動中思考、夏林清譯、2004、遠流）
Schuck, J. R. (1973). Factors affecting reports of fragmenting visual images. Perception and Psychophysics, 13, 382-390.
Scrivener, SAR. (1982). The interactive manipulation of unstructured images. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 16, 301-313.
Scrivener, SAR. et al. (2000). Uncertainty and sketching behavior. Design Studies, 21(5), 465-481.
Shepard, R. N. (1968). Cognitive Psychology: A review of the book by U. Neisser. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 285-289.
Shepard, R. N., & Chipman, S. (1970). Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: Shapes of states.
Cognitive Psychology, 1, 1-17.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Solso, R. L., MacLin, M. K., & MacLin, O. H. (2005). Cognitive psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. **
Summerson, J. (1957). The Case for a Theory of Modern Architecture. RIBA Journal 64, no. 8, reprinted in Ockman, ed., Architecture Culture 1943-1968, p. 233.
Suwa, M. (1998). Content-oriented Protocol Analysis Coding Scheme. Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Sydney, Australia.
Suwa, M., Gero, J. S. & Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and s-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies, 21, 539-567.
Suwa, M., Purell, T. & Gero, J.S. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19(4), 455-483.
Suwa, M. & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? a protocol analysis.
Design Studies, 18(4), 385-403
Suwa, M., Tversky, B., Gero, J. & Purcell, T. (2001). Seeing into sketches: Regrouping parts encourages new interpretations. Visual and spatial reasoning in designⅡ. 209-219.
Thomas, J. C. & Carroll, J. M. (1979). The psychological study of design. Design Studies, 1(1), 5-11.
Thomas, J. C. & Carroll, J. M. (1984). The psychological study of design. In Cross, N. (eds), Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 221-35.
Verstijnen et al. (1998). Sketching and creative discovery. Design studies, 19(4), 519-546.
Won, P. H. (2001). The comparison between visual thinking using computer and conventional media in the concept generation stages of design. Automation in Construction, 10, 319-325.
Wong, C. H. (2000). Some phenomena of design thinking in the concept generation stage using computer media. CAADRIA 2000, Singapore, 255-264.
Zafer, B. (2001). Designers‚ Cognition in Traditional versus Digital Media during Conceptual Design. Bilkent University Ankara Turkey.
Zeisel, J. (1981). Inquiry by design: Tools for environment-behavior research. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. （中文版：研究 與設計：環境行為研究的工具、關華山譯、1996、田園城市）
何孝元, (1995). 設計知識的研究－人類設計行為與電腦輔助設計系統之間的差距. 交大應藝所, 新竹, 台灣.
唐玄輝, (1997). 設計思考中口語整合編碼系統初探. 交大應藝所, 新竹, 台灣.
鄭乃文, (1999). 影音回溯資料初探-以設計思考為研究面向. 交大建研所, 新竹, 台灣.
胡文昌, (2000). 以方法引導之設計與其設計心智歷程初探. 交大應藝所, 新竹, 台灣 李惠琳, (2002). 使用電腦及傳統媒材在構想發展過程上的比較. 交大建研所, 新竹, 台灣.
附錄
A. 補充資料
︳注意力
︳行為習慣
B. 實驗資料
B.1 發題 B.2 設計資料
︳受測者 A
︳受測者 B
︳受測者 C
︳受測者 D B.3 訪談資料
︳受測者 A
︳受測者 B
︳受測者 C
︳受測者 D B.4 解析資料
︳慣用 Pen _受測者 A- Stage 1
︳非慣用 Pen _受測者 B-Stage 4
︳慣用 SketchUp _受測者 B-Stage 1
︳非慣用 SketchUp _受測者 D-Stage 2
︳受測者 A- Stage2_SketchUp
︳受測者 A- Stage3 _Physical Model
︳受測者 A- Stage4 _3ds Max