第七章 結論與建議
第三節 後續研究建議
本研究因時間與研究範圍等限制,僅能以 WOS 資料庫收錄之文獻資料,
作為女性研究領域之研究代表,分析其出版年代、語文、國別、文獻類型、期 刊與作者生產力、研究機構等要項,但研究之中仍有不足之處,列出以下幾點 作為後續研究之參考。
一、研究對象方面
本研究係針對女性研究(廣義)文獻進行書目計量學研究,分析 WOS 資
料庫中 1908 年至 2013 年所出版之文獻,也因此研究範圍僅限於 WOS,無法涵 蓋全球所有的學術生產力。未來研究,可擴大研究範圍,同時檢索多個資料 庫,以求得較完整的研究樣本。並可繼續研究未來之走向,以進行不同時期女 性研究(廣義)發展之比較分析,並瞭解女性研究(廣義)的長期發展趨勢。
二、其他書目計量學範疇之研究
書目計量學之研究範疇廣泛,包括基本文獻的特性分析;布萊德福、洛 卡、齊夫三大定律的應用與驗證;引用文獻分析;文獻老化等。本研究僅針對 文獻基本特性、布萊德福、洛卡定律以及少部份的引用文獻進行分析研究,所 呈現的研究結果是一客觀性的參考資料。未來研究,可納入其他書目計量學之 研究方法,進一步探討更完整的引用文獻分析、文獻老化等狀況,以求得更完 整的女性研究文獻特性與其發展趨勢。
三、研究內容的再探究
(一)女性研究不同學科之間的女性研究再探
本研究是以綜合性資料庫 WOS 為研究對象,而研究結果顯示女性研究常 跨不同主題領域,未來研究可進一步深入探討不同學科之間女性研究文獻的內 容、特性與差異,或是與前人的研究主題,比較書目計量學研究,以瞭解不同 學科間文獻特性的異同之處。
(二)採用其他作者計數法
本研究作者生產力分布與洛卡定律、普萊斯平方根定律以及 80/20 定律之 驗證部份,對作者計數採兩種常見的方式,分別為「平等法」與「第一作者 法」。另外常用的作者計數方式尚有「平均分配法」與「加權法」。「平均分配 法」指的是根據合作者人數,每人平均取得相同百分比,亦即有三人合著的狀
139
況下,每人各為 1/3;「加權法」則是依排名先後來決定所佔比率的多少,如:
三位作者,排名第一為 50%、第二為 30%,第三為 20%等。因此,後續研究可 採用此兩種作者計數方式,進一步瞭解不同的作者計數方式,是否會造成作者 生產力分布的變化。
參考文獻
IBM Corporation(2011)。IBM SPSS Statistics 20 簡易使用指南。檢索自 ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/20.0/zh _TW/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Brief_Guide.pdf
The Reimagined.重組想像的.青春無敵篇(2006,6 月 7 日)。【女性主義理論】
Haraway's Cyborg Manifesto (人機合體宣言,1991)【部落格文字資料】。檢索 自 http://blog.roodo.com/sabinasun/archives/1724217.html
中國大百科出版社編(2005)。文獻計量學【中國大百科全書智慧藏知識 庫】。檢索自
http://ermg.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/er/swlink.cgi?ccd=vG9bz1&o=e2
尤慧敏 (2002)。台灣地區生命科學生產力之國際指標研究(未出版之碩士論 文)。淡江大學,新北市。
王明玲、杜立中、曾彩娥(2009,6 月)。臺灣出版五四運動文獻之書目計量 研究。國家圖書館館刊,1,93-113。
何光國(1994)。文獻計量學導論。臺北市:三民。
李光 (2013)。國內圖書館館際合作研究文獻的計量分析。圖書館學刊,2,
119-120,127。
李根芳(2011)。「定位政治作為跨國女性主義批評實踐」:一種文化翻譯的 可 能。載於編者游素玲(主編),跨國女性研究導讀(90-103 頁)。臺北 市:五南。
李銀河(2004)。女性主義。臺北市:五南。
林怡甄(2008)。「輸送現象」之文獻特性分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立 政治大學,臺北市。
林信成、洪銘禪(2011)。布萊德福與洛卡定律於 Wiki 網站計量之分析。教育 資料與圖書館學,48(3),325-346。
林麗珊(2013)。女性主義與性別關係。臺北市:五南。
141
邱子修(2009,4 月)。西方第三波女性主義思潮概述。婦研縱橫,90,56-61。
邱信一(2010)。臺灣公共衛生系所文獻作者生產力與影響力之研究(未出版 之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
洪世芳(2003)。OPAC 文獻之書目計量學研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江 大學,新北市。
許文華(2002)。醫學基因工程文獻之書目計量學研究(未出版之碩士論 文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
通色. 通性-性傾向及性別身分認同通識教材(2010)。酷兒理論(Queer Theory)。檢索自 http://leslovestudy.com/liberal-studies/concept14.shtml
陳昭如(2013)。Catharine A. MacKinnon:宰制論女性主義法學的開創者。婦 研縱橫,98,51-62。
陳寶華(2009)。燃料電池文獻與專利之科學計量研究(未出版之碩士論 文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
彭慰(1995,12 月)。書目計量法【圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典】。檢索自 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1681681/?index=2
黃秀琴(1999)。會議文獻作者生產力與其延續出版品之研究:以國防科技學術 研討會為例(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
楊彥緒(2003)。 隨機對照試驗醫學文獻之書目計量學研究(未出版之碩士論 文)。淡江大學,新北市。
楊雅婷、顏詩怡、司馬學文、林育如(譯)(2009)。性別與女性研究手冊(原作 者:K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber)。新北市:韋伯。(原著出版年:2006)
董蕙茹(2008)。台灣地區的世界文學翻譯作品:書目計量分析(未出版之碩 士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
蔡明月(1987)。書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學,24(3),261-296。
蔡明月(1997)。文獻成長現象。中國圖書館學會會報,59,135-153。
蔡明月(1998)。 布萊德福定律 Bradford’s Law。資訊傳播與圖書館學,5
(2),25-27。
蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。 臺北市:華泰。
蔡明月、邱琦茹(2013)。臺灣人文學文獻引用類型分析研究。教育資料與圖 書館學,51(3),111-138。
蔡明月、陳憶玲(2006)。生醫科學期刊引用數據之分析比較。國家圖書館館 刊,95(1),1-33。
蔡明月、劉瓊芳(2007,6 月)。1992-2005 資訊計量學研究及其發展演變。圖 書與資訊學刊,61,42-56。
Abramo, G., D'angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system.
Scientometrics, 79(3), 517-539. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-2046-8
Afolabi, M. (1989). The literature of onchocerciasis: 1960-1681. International Library Review, 21, 487-493.
Ahmed, S. M. Z., & Rahman, M. A. (2008). Nutrition literature of Bangladesh: A bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13(1), 35-43.
Aksnes, D., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628-636. doi:
10.1002/asi.21486
Barrios, M., Villarroya, A., & Borrego, A. N. (2013). Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis. Scientometrics, 95(1), 15-23. doi:
10.1007/s11192-012-0816-4
Bennett, J. M. (1989). Feminism and History. Gender & History, 1(3), 251-272.
Bobel, C. (2006). “Our revolution has style”: Contemporary menstrual product activists “doing feminism” in the third wave. Sex Roles, 54, 331-345. doi:
10.1007/s11199-006-9001-7
Bottle, R.T., & Efthimiadis, E.N. (1984). Library and information science literature:
authorship and growth patterns. Journal of Information Science, 9(3), 107-116.
143
Brookes, B. C. (1969). Bradford law and the bibliography of science. Nature, 224(5223), 953.
Cambridge University Press (2014). American Political Science Review. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PSRAmerican Cott, N. F. (1987). The grounding of modern feminism. New Haven: Yale University
Press.
Cronin, B., & Overfelt, K. (1994). Citation-based auditing of academic performance.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), 61-72.
Drott, M. C. (1981). Bradford’s law: theory, empiricism and the gaps between.
Library Trends, 30(1), 41-52.
Efthimiadis, E.N. (1990). The growth of the OPAC literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(5), 342-347.
Egghe, L. (1994). A theory of continuous rates and applications to the theory growth and obsolescence rates. Information Processing & Management, 30(2), 279.
Elsevier (2014). Women's Studies International Forum. Retrieved from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/womens-studies-international-forum Feminist Studies (2014). About us. Retrieved from
http://www.feministstudies.org/home.html
Frame, J. D., & Narin, F. (1987). The Growth of Chinese Scientific Research, 1973-84. Scientometrics, 12(1-2), 135-144.
Frame, J. D., Baum, J. J., & Card, M. (1979). An information approach to examining developments in an energy technology: coal gasification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30, 193-201.
Freedman, E. B. (2006). Beyond the waves: rethinking the history of feminisms. In C.
R. Berkin, J. L. Pinch, & C. S. Appel (Eds.), In Exploring Women’s Studies:
Looking Forward, Looking Back . New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Garfield, E. (1980). Bradford’s law and related statistical patterns. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4(19), 476-483.
Gerhard, K. H. (1998). Women’s studies serials: a quarter-century of development.
The Serials Librarian, 35(1-2), 1-7.
Goffman, W., & Morris, T. G. (1967). Bradford’s law and library acquisitions. Nature 226, 197-207.
Gupta, B.M., Kumar, S., Syed, S., and Singh, K.V. (1996). Distribution of
Productivity among Authors inPotato Research 1900-1980. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 33(3), 127-134.
Hawkins, D. T. (1978). The literature of noble gas compounds. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 18(4), 190-199.
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., Beane , W. E., Lucker , G. W., & Matthews, K. A.
(1980). Making it in academic psychology: demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 896-908.
Hemmings, C. (2006). The life and times of academic feminism. In K. Davis, M.
Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), Handbook of Gender and Women’s Studies (pp. 13-34). London: Sage.
Kademani, B. S., Kalyane, V. L., & Balakrishnan, M. R. (1994). Scientometric portrait of P. K. Iyengar. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 31(4), 155-176.
Krikos, L. A. (1994). Women’s studies periodical indexes: An in-depth comparison.
Serials Review, 20(2), 65-78.
Krikos, L. A. (2004). Periodicals. In L. A. Krikos & C. Ingold (Eds.), Women's studies: a recommended bibliography (pp. 721-730). Westport: Libraries Unliminted.
Krolokke, C., & Sorensen, A. S. (2006). Three waves of feminism: from suffrages to grrls. In Gender Communication Theories and Analyses. California: Sage Publication. Retrieved from
http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/6236_Chapter_1_Krolokke_2nd_Rev_Final_Pdf.pdf
Leavens, D. H. (1953). Letter to the editor in Econometrica. Econometrica, 21(4), 630-632.
Lewison, G. (2001). The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric
145
study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52(1), 29-43.
Lewison, G., & Markusova, V. (2011). Female researchers in Russia: have they become more visible? Scientometrics, 89(1), 139-152.
Library of Congress. Library of Congress subject headings. Retrieved from http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects.html
Line, M. B., & Roberts, S. (1976). The size, growth and composition of social science literature. Internal Social Science Journal, 28(1), 122-159.
Lotka, Alfred J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy Science, 16(12), 317-323.
Mack, T. (1991). A model methodology for selecting women’s studies core journals.
Library & Information Science Research, 13(2), 131-145.
Magyar, G. (1974). Bibliometric analysis of a new research subfield. Journal of Documentation, 30, 32-40.
Maparyan, L. (2012). Feminism. In C. M. Orr, A. Braithwaite, & D. Lichtenstein, (Eds.), Rethinking Women’s and Gender Studies (pp 15-33). New York:
Routledge.
Merlo, C. R., Hoeffner, L., Merlo, J. M., & Moscatelli, R. (2011). An analysis of computer science education publication using Lotka's law. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 26(3), 85-92.
Mommoh, O. M. (1995/96). Characteristics of the literature of library education in Nigeria, 1948-1995. Library Focus, 13 & 14, 76-92.
Mozaffarian, M., & Jamali, H. R. (2008). Iranian women in science: a gender study of scientific productivity in an Islamic country. Aslib Proceedings, 60(5), 463-473.
Murphy, L. J. (1973). Lotka’s Law in the Humanities? Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 24(6), 461-462.
National Women’s Studies Association. What Is Women’s Studies? Retrieved from http://www.nwsa.org/content.asp?pl=19&contentid=21
Nisonger, T. (2008). The “80/20 Rule” and core journals. The Serials Librarian,
55(1), 62-84.
Nweke, K.M.C. (1989). Citation analysis Study of Authors of the Literature Used by Reaearch Scholars in Zoology at the Ibadan University, Nigeria. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 36(4), 139-147.
Offen, K. (2001). Women’s suffrage. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.),
International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (1st ed., pp.16534-16538). New York: Elsevier.
Oliver, M. R. (1971). The effect of growth on the obsolescence of semiconductor physics literature. Journal of Documentation, 27(1), 11-17.
Oxford University Press (2014). The American Historical Review. Retrieved from http://ahr.oxfordjournals.org/
Pao, M. L. (1986). An Empirical Examination of Lotka’s Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 26-33
Pinto, M. a., Escalona-Ferna´ndez, M. a. I., & Pulgarı´n, A. (2013). Information literacy in social sciences and health sciences: a bibliometric study (1974–2011).
Scientometrics, 95(3), 1071-1094. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0899-y
Potter, W. G. (1981, Summer). Lotka’s law revisited. Library Trends, 30, 36-37.
Price, D. J. d. S. (1963). Little Science, Big Science and Beyond. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Prozesky, H., & Boshoff, N. (2012). Bibliometrics as a tool for measuring gender-specific research performance: an example from South African invasion ecology.
Scientometrics, 90(2), 383-406. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0478-7
Psychological Association (2013). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/psp/
Psychology’s Feminist Voices (2012). About us. Retrieved from http://www.feministvoices.com/about
Robinson, V. (1993). Introducing women’s studies. In D. Richardson, & V. Robinson (Eds.), Introducing Women’s Studies (pp. 1-26). Hampshire: Macmillan.
147
Sage Journals (2012). Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. Retrieved from http://csx.sagepub.com/
Sengupta, I. N. (1985). Bibliometrics: A bird’s eye view. LASLIC Bulletin, 60, 167-174.
Signs (2012). About Signs. Retrieved from http://signsjournal.org/about-signs/
Smith, J. H. (1984). The Application of Selected Bibliometric Techniques to the Recent Learning Style Literature (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Delta State University, United States.
Spinger (2013). Sex Roles. Retrieved from
http://www.springer.com/psychology/personality+%26+social+psychology/journ al/11199
Stack, S. (2002). Gender and scholarly productivity: The case of criminal justice.
Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 175-182.
Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. G. (2001). Power laws of research output. Evidence for journals of economics. Scientometrics, 51(2), 405-414.
Synder-Hall, R. C. (2010). Third-wave feminism and the defense of “choice”.
Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 255-261.
The Ohio State University (2014). About Frontiers. Retrieved fromhttps://frontiers.osu.edu/about-us
The University of Chicago Divinity School (2013). Jean Bethke Elshtain, scholar of religion and political philosophy, 1941-2013. Retrieved from
https://divinity.uchicago.edu/jean-bethke-elshtain-scholar-religion-and-political-philosophy-1941-2013
Thomas, W. J., & Younce, L. (2008). Investigating women’s studies core journals:
librarians’ tools, citations and speculations. In B. R. Bernharclt, T. Daniels, & K.
Steinle (Eds.), Charleston Conference Proceedings 2007 (pp.107-118). Westport:
Libraries Unlimited.
UCLA Center for the Study of Women (2014). Ellen Carol DuBois. Retrieved from http://www.csw.ucla.edu/people/advisory-committee/ellen-dubois
Ulrichsweb global serials directory (2013). About the Ulrich's knowledgebase.
Retrieved from http://www.ulrichsweb.com/ulrichsweb/faqs.asp
University of Kent (2014). Social policy, sociology and social research. Retrieved from http://www.kent.ac.uk/sspssr/staff/academic/sayers.html
University of Oxford (2013). The million women study. Retrived from http://www.millionwomenstudy.org/introduction/
University of Wisconsin (2012). Professor Myra Marx Ferree. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~mferree/
University of York (2014, May). Professor Celia Kitzinger. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/sociology/our-staff/academic/celia-kitzinger/
Wiley Online Library (2014). Medical Education. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2923/homepage/ProductInformation.html
Woman Suffrage. (2013). In The Columbia Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://www.credoreference.com/topic/woman_suffrage/
Women & Gender Studies Section (2008, June). Core list of journals for women and gender studies. Retrieved from http://libr.org/wgss/projects/serial.html
Zhang, H. (1994). A bibliometric study on medicine Chinese traditional in MEDLINE database. Scientometrics, 31(3), 241-251
149
排序 國家 文獻篇數 百分比(%) 累積百分比(%)
151
排序 國家 文獻篇數 百分比(%) 累積百分比(%)
69 辛巴威 1 0.01 100.00
總計 16,852 100.00 100
附錄二 女性研究文獻主題領域分布表
主題領域 相關主題領域 文獻篇數
Psychology 心理學
Psychology, Multidisciplinary 多學科心理學 309 Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Women's Studies
多學科心理學;女性研究 307
多學科心理學;女性研究 307