有權決定者的法令違憲審查機制，促進憲法的實踐、深化憲法的價
值，恐怕才是現階段最佳的選擇。
92
參考文獻
一、 中文
1. Björn Ahl, 憲法至上—德國的憲法發展及中國當前的憲法著述，載：林峰 編著，百年憲政與中國憲政的未來，頁337-348，2011。
Ahl, Björn, Supremacy of the Constitution: Constitutional Development in Germany and Contemporary Chinese Publications on Constitution Law, in Lin, Feng (eds.), Constitutionalism in China in the Last 100 Years and Its Future, pp. 337-348, 2011.
2. 王磊，憲法的司法化，2000。
Wang, Lei, Judicialization of Constitutional Law, 2000.
3. 付子堂，美國、法國和中國憲法監督模式之比較，法學，2000 年第 5 期，
頁14-17，2000。
Fu, Zi-Tang, The Comparison of Constitutional Supervision Models among the United States, France, and China, Law Science, no. 5 of 2000, pp. 14-17, 2000.
4. 田飛龍，探尋中國憲法的“民主化”實施之路，中國圖書評論，2010 年第 6 期，頁 41-45，2010。
Tian, Fei-Long, In Search of the Road to “Democratize” China’s Constitution, China Book Review, no. 3 of 2010, pp. 41-45, 2010.
5. 何海波，沒有憲法的違憲審查—英國故事，中國社會科學，2005 年第 2 期，頁109-122+206，2005。
He, Hai-Bo, Constitutional Review without a Constitution: The British Story, Social Sciences In China, no. 2 of 2005, pp. 109-122+206, 2005.
6. 吳庚，憲法的解釋與適用，3 版，2004。
Wu, Geng, The Interpretation and Application of the Constitution, 3d ed., 2004.
7. 李雪峰、李勇，英、美、法違憲審查制度的憲政理念比較研究，學術研 究，2003 年第 10 期，頁 62-65+79，2003。
Li, Xue-Feng & Li, Yong, A Comparative Study on the Constitutional
Theories underlying the Judicial Review Systems among the United Kingdom, the United States, and France, Academic Research, no. 10 of 2003, pp.
62-65+79, 2003.
8. 汪再祥，英國憲政的歷史性轉折─英國《2004 年憲政性改革法案》述評，
法商研究，2005 年第 3 期，頁 150-155，2005。
Wang, Zai-Xiang, The Historical Transition of U.K’s Constitutional Politics:
Comments on “Constitutional Reform Act 2004,” Studies In Law and
93
Business, no. 3 of 2005, pp. 150-155, 2005.
9. 林來梵，中國的違憲審查：特色及生成實態－從三個有關用語的變化策 略來看，浙江社會科學，2010 年第 5 期，頁 33-40，2010。
Lin, Laifan, “Constitutional Review” in China: Characteristics and Actuality of Generating—From the Perspective of the Tactics for Change of Three Related Terms, Zhejiang Social Sciences, no. 5 of 2010, pp. 33-40, 2010.
10. 林廣華，違憲審查制度比較研究，2004。
Lin, Guang-Hua, A Comparative Study on the Systems of Constitutional Review, 2004.
11. 法治斌、董保城，憲法新論，4 版，2010。
Fa, Zhi-Bin & Dong, Bao-Cheng, Constitutional Law, 4th ed., 2010.
12. 姜峰，違憲審查：一根救命的稻草？，政法論壇，第 28 卷第 1 期，頁 58-66，
2010。
Jiang, Feng, Judicial Review: a Life-saving Straw?, Tribune of Political Science and Law, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 58-66, 2010.
13. 胡錦光，從憲法事例看我國憲法救濟制度的完善，法學家，2003 年第 3 期，頁36-44，2003。
Hu, Jin-Guang, On the Perfection of Our Constitutional Remedy System: A Perspective from Constitutional Events, Jurists Review, no. 3 of 2003, pp.
36-44, 2003.
14. 胡錦光，論中國對行政行為司法審查的演進與課題，載：林峰編著，百 年憲政與中國憲政的未來，頁349-378，2011。
Hu, Jin-Guang, On the Development and Issues of Judicial Review over Administrative Actions in China, in Lin, Feng (eds.), Constitutionalism in China in the Last 100 Years and Its Future, pp. 349-378, 2011.
15. 胡錦光，論啟動違憲審查主體資格的理念，載：政治大學公法學中心主 編，第三屆海峽兩岸公法學論壇會議論文集，頁7-18，2012。
Hu, Jin-Guang. On the Subject Qualifications for Initiating Constitutional Review, in NCCU Public Law Center (eds.), Papers for the Third Conference of Cross-strait Public Law Forum, pp. 7-18, 2012.
16. 胡錦光主編，違憲審查比較研究，2006。
Hu, Jin-Guang (eds.), A Comparative Study on Constitutional Review, 2006.
17. 范進學，中國大陸憲法監督程式制度之反思與變造，載：政治大學公法 學中心主編，第三屆海峽兩岸公法學論壇會議論文集，頁37-50，2012。
Fan, Jin-Xue, Introspection and Transformation of China’s Constitutional Supervision Procedure, in NCCU Public Law Center (eds.), Papers for the Third Conference of Cross-strait Public Law Forum, pp. 37-50, 2012.
18. 秦前紅、周偉，人民代表大會制度的歷史回顧與憲政思考—寫在人民代
94
表大會制度誕生50 週年之際，人大研究，2004 年第 10 期，頁 11-16，2004。
Qin, Qian-Hong & Zhou, Wei, A Historical Review and Constitutional thinking on the institution of people’s congress, People’s Congress Studying, no. 10 of 2004, pp. 11-16, 2004.
19. 張千帆，中國憲政的路徑與局限，法學，2011 年第 1 期，頁 70-78，2011。
Zhang, Qian-Fan, Paths and Limits of Chinese Constitutional Politics, Law Science, no. 1 of 2011, pp. 70-78, 2011.
20. 張千帆、黃嶽，從憲法到憲政—中國大陸憲法審查制度的歷史、現狀與 未來，載：湯德宗、王鵬翔主編，2006 年兩岸四地法律發展(上)：違憲 審查與行政訴訟，頁45-80，2007。
Zhang, Qian-Fan & Huang, Yue, From Constitution to Constitutionalism: the Past, the Present and the Future of the Constitutional Review in Mainland China, in Dennis Te-Chung Tang & Wang, Peng-Hsiang (eds.), Cross-Strait, Four-Region Law Developments in Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, and Macau (Volume One), pp. 45-80, 2007.
21. 強世功，憲法司法化的悖論—兼論法學家在推動憲政中的困境，中國社 會科學，2003 年第 2 期，頁 18-28+204，2003。
Qiang, Shi-Gong, Paradoxes in the Discourse of Constitutional
Adjudication, Social Sciences In China, no. 2 of 2003, pp. 18-28+204, 2003.
22. 莫紀宏，中國法律法規合憲性審查的標準，載：林峰編著，百年憲政與 中國憲政的未來，頁95-116，2011。
Mo, Ji-Hong, Standards for Reviewing the Constitutionality of Statutes and Regulations in China, in Lin, Feng (eds.), Constitutionalism in China in the Last 100 Years and Its Future, pp. 95-116, 2011.
23. 莫紀宏，中國違憲審查制度的歷史演變、存在的問題和發展趨勢，載：
湯德宗、王鵬翔主編，2006 年兩岸四地法律發展(上)：違憲審查與行政 訴訟，頁81-130，2007。
Mo, Ji-Hong, Historical Development, Existing Problems and Future Trend of China’s Constitutional Review, in Dennis Te-Chung Tang & Wang,
Peng-Hsiang (eds.), Cross-Strait, Four-Region Law Developments in Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, and Macau (Volume One), pp. 81-130, 2011.
24. 許崇德，論我國的憲法監督，法學，2009 年第 10 期，頁 3-9，2009。
Xu, Chong-De, On China’s Constitutional Supervision, Law Science, no. 10 of 2009, pp. 3-9, 2009.
25. 陳弘毅，齊案批復的廢止與憲法司法化和法院援引憲法問題，法學，2009 年第3 期，頁 11-14，2009。
Chen, Hong-Yi, The Abolishment of the Reply of People’s Supreme Court on the Qi Case, Judicialization of Constitution, and the Issue over Application of
95
Constitutional Provisions by Courts, Law Science, no. 3 of 2009, pp. 11-14, 2009.
26. 陳新民，憲法學釋論，7 版，2011。
Chen, Shin-Min, Constitutional Law, 7th ed., 2011.
27. 陳端洪，立法的民主合法性與立法至上—中國立法批評，中外法學，1998 年第6 期，頁 59-69，1998。
Chen, Duan-Hong, The Democratic Legitimacy of Legislation and Legislative Supremacy, Deiking University Law Journal, no. 6 of 1998, pp. 59-69, 1998.
28. 湯德宗，試論大陸確立違憲審查制度的途徑，載：湯德宗、王鵬翔主編，
2006 兩岸四地法律發展（上）違憲審查與行政訴訟，頁 131-142，2007。
Dennis Te-Chung Tang, Comment: On the Possible Paths of Establishing Constitutional Review in Mainland China, in Dennis Te-Chung Tang & Wang, Peng-Hsiang (eds.), Cross-Strait, Four-Region Law Developments in Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, and Macau (Volume One), pp. 81-130, 2011.
29. 焦洪昌，公民違憲違法審查建議處理程序及其完善，載：政治大學公法 學中心主編，第三屆海峽兩岸公法學論壇會議論文集，頁83-90，2012。
Jiao, Hung-Chang, Procedures for Civil Proposals of Review over Constitutionality and Legality and Its Perfection, in NCCU Public Law Center (eds.), Papers for the Third Conference of Cross-strait Public Law Forum, pp. 83-90, 2012.
30. 焦洪昌，論我國憲法司法適用的空間，政法論壇，第 21 卷第 2 期，頁 18-23，2003。
Jiao, Hung-Chang, On the Possibility of Judicial Application of the
Constitution in China, Tribune of Political Science and Law, vol. 21, no. 2, pp.
18-23, 2003.
31. 童之偉，人大制度要進一步增強實用性，法律科學，2004 年第 5 期，頁 17-19，2004。
Tong, Zhi-Wei, Toward a more Improved and Practical Institution of People’s Congress, Science of Law, no. 5 of 2004, pp. 17-19, 2004.
32. 童之偉，法院“依照法律”行使審判權釋論－以我國法院與憲法之關係為 重點的考察，中國法學，2009 年第 6 期，頁 148-167，2009。
Tong, Zhi-Wei, Interpreting the Idea of Exercising the Judicial Authority “in accordance with Law”: Focusing on the Relationship between the
Constitution and Courts in China, China Legal Science, no. 6 of 2009, pp.
148-167, 2009.
33. 童之偉，順應時勢變遷更新人大制度理念，法學，2009 年第 12 期，頁 3-13，2009。
Tong, Zhi-Wei, Updating the Institution of People’s Congress with the
96
Current Trend, Law Science, no. 12 of 2009, pp. 3-13, 2009.
34. 童之偉，憲法司法適用研究中的幾個問題，法學，2001 年第 11 期，頁 3-8+51，2001。
Tong, Zhi-Wei, Issues regarding the Study on Judicial Application of the Constitution, Law Science, no. 11 of 2001, pp. 3-8+51, 2001.
35. 童之偉，憲法適用應依循憲法本身規定的路徑，中國法學，2008 年第 6 期，頁22-48，2008。
Tong, Zhi-Wei, The Application of Constitution Should Follow the Routes Specified in the Constitution Itself, China Legal Science, no. 6 of 2008, pp.
22-48, 2008.
36. 費善誠，試論我國違憲審查制度的模式選擇，政法論壇，1999 年第 2 期，
頁2-13，1999。
Fei, Shan-Cheng, Study on the Choice of Different Models of Constitutional Review in China, Tribune of Political Science and Law, no. 2 of 1999, pp.
2-13, 1999.
37. 熊文釗，在人民代表大會制度框架下適用憲法，法學，2009 年第 4 期，
頁21-24，2009。
Xiong, Wen-Zhao, Application of the Constitution under the Framework of People’s Congress, Law Science, no. 4 of 2009, pp. 21-24, 2009.
38. 翟小波，代議機關至上的人民憲政－我國憲法實施模式的解釋性建構，
清華法學，2007 年第 2 期，頁 35-53，2007。
Di, Xiao-Bo, People’s Constitutional Politics under the Supremacy of Representative Institution: An Interpretative Construction of How to Carry out China’s Constitution, Tsinghua Law Review, no. 2 of 2007, pp. 35-53, 2007.
39. 蔡定劍，憲法實施的概念與憲法施行之道，中國法學，2004 年第 1 期，
頁21-26，2004。
Cai, Ding-Jian, The Concept and Measures of Carrying Out the Constitution, China Legal Science, no. 1 of 2004, pp. 21-26, 2004.
40. 韓大元，《憲法解釋程序法》的意義、思路與框架，浙江社會科學，2009 年第9 期，頁 15-22，2009。
Han, Da-Yuan, The Meaning, Thinking, and Framework of the “Code of Constitutional Interpretation Procedure”, Zhejiang Social Sciences, no. 9 of 2009, pp. 15-22, 2009.
41. 蘇永欽，合憲法律解釋原則－從功能法上考量其運作界線與效力問題，
載：氏著，合憲性控制的理論與實際，頁79-142，1994。
Su, Yeong-Chin, The Principal of Interpreting the Law in Line with the Constitution: Its Limits and Validity from the Perspective of Functional Law,
97
in Su, Yeong-Chin, Theory and Practice of Constitutional Control, pp. 79-142, 1994.
42. 蘇永欽，走向規範憲法—從台灣的經驗看大陸的選擇，載：政治思潮與 國家法學—吳庚教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集，頁 227-262，2010。
Su, Yeong-Chin, Toward a Normative Constitution: the Choice of Mainland China from the Perspective of Experiences in Taiwan, in Political Thoughts and National Jurisprudence, Festschrift in Honor of Prof. Wu Geng’s 70th Birthday, pp. 227-262, 2010.
二、 英文
1. Andenas, Mads, A European Perspective on Judicial Independence and Accountability, 41 INT'L LAW. 1 (2007).
2. Backer, Larry Cata, A Constitutional Court for China within the Chinese Communist Party: Scientific Development and a Reconsideration of the Institutional Role of the CCP, 43 SUFFOLK U.L.REV. 593 (2010).
3. Barber, N.W., The Afterlife of Parliamentary Sovereignty, 9 I.J.C.L. 144 (2011).
4. Brdley, A.W., The Sovereignty of Parliament—Form or Substance, in 23 THE
CHANGING CONSTITUTION 58 (Jeffrey Jowell & Dawn Oliver eds., 4thed. 2000).
5. Craig, Paul, Britain in the European Union, in 61 THE CHANGING CONSTITUTION 88 (Jeffrey Jowell & Dawn Oliver eds., 4thed. 2000).
6. Delmestro, Manuel E., The Communist Party and the Law: An Outline of Formal and Less Formal Linkages between the Ruling Party and other Legal Institutions in the People’he Communist Party , 43 SUFFOLK U.L.REV. 681 (2010).
7. Dougan, Michael & Michael Gordon, The United Kingdom's European Union Act 2011: "Who Won the Bloody War Anyway?," 37E.L.REV. 3 (2012).
8. Elliot, Mark, Bicameralism, Sovereignty, and the Unwritten Constitution, 5 INT'L J.
CONST.L. 370 (2007).
9. Geddis, Andrew & Bridget Fenton, “Which is to be Master?”— Rights-Friendly Statutory Interpretation in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, 25 Ariz. J. Int'l &
Comp. L. 733 (2008).
10. Hill, Lord Lester of Herne, QC, Human Rights and the British Constitution, in 89 THE CHANGING CONSTITUTION 110 (Jeffrey Jowell & Dawn Oliver eds., 4thed.
2000).
11. KAVANAGH,AILEEN,CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW UNDER THE UKHUMAN RIGHTS
ACT (2009).
12. KEIR,D.L. AND F.H.LAWSON,CASES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (5th ed. 1967).
13. LEYLAND,PETER,THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM—ACONTEXTUAL
98 ANALYSIS (2d ed. 2012).
14. Lustgarten, Laurence & Ian Leigh, Making Rights Real: the Courts, Remedies, and the Human Rights Act, 58 C.L.J. 509 (1999).
15. Malkani, Bharat, Human rights treaties in the English legal system, 2011 P.L. 554.
16. MINISTRY OF JUSTICE,RESPONDING TO HUMAN RIGHTS JUDGMENTS:REPORT TO THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO
HUMAN RIGHTS JUDGMENTS 2010-11, Sept. 2011, available at
http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm81/8162/8162.pdf (last visited Oct. 8, 2011).
17. OLIVER,DAWN,CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN THE UK (2003).
18. SCARMAN,L.,ENGLISH LAW:THE NEW DIMENSION (1974).
19. SCHYFF,GERHARD VAN DER,JUDICIAL REVIEW OF LEGISLATION:ACOMPARATIVE
STUDY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, THE NETHERLANDS, AND SOUTH AFRICA (2010).
20. Seymour, David, The Extension of the European Convention on Human Rights to Central and Eastern Europe: Prospects and Risks, 8 CONN.J.INT'L L. 243 (1993).
21. Shen, Kui, Is it the Beginning of the Era of the Rule of the Constitution?
Reinterpreting China’s “First Constitutional Case,” 12 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 199 (2003).
22. White, Richard, Separation of Powers and Legislative Supremacy, 127 L.Q. R. 456 (2011).
23. Wintemute, Robert, Lesbian and Gay Inequality 2000: The Potential of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Need for an Equality Act 2002, 6 E.H.R. L. R. 603 (2000).
24. Wolcher, Louis E., A Philosophical Investigation into Methods of Constitutional Interpretation in the United States and the United Kingdom, 13 VA.J.SOC.POL'Y &
L. 239 (2006).
25. Zhu, Guobin, Constitutional Review in China: An Unaccomplished Project or a Mirage?, 43 SUFFOLK U.L.REV. 625 (2010).
99
Supremacy of Parliament and Supremacy of People’s Congress What China Can Learn from the Development of Constitutional
Review in the United Kingdom