第五章 結論與建議
第五節 未來展望
綜合研究目的、研究方法、統計分析分果與結論，本研究仍有缺失之處，希望後續 研究能加以參考並改進，茲列出以下幾點建議：
一、針對特定行動遊戲進行探討
由於時間的關係，本研究並非針對特定行動遊戲作研究，未來希望能夠針對特定行 動遊戲進行研究，藉此能提出更多不同的理論與模式。
二、深入研究以發展更好的理論模式
本研究只針對行動遊戲玩家的沉浸體驗進行探討，希望未來能加入更多可能影響行 動遊戲玩家的沉浸體驗之因素，做更進一步的探討，以建構出更完美的研究模式，也能 更完整的詮釋現今不斷蓬勃發展及瞬息萬變的科技世代。
58
參考文獻
一、中文文獻
1. 王筱琪，2008，創新科技產品採用行為之分析－以 Wii 為例，私立元智大學企業 管理研究所 碩士論文
2. 林娟娟、沈芝帆，2005，線上遊戲商城道具購買意願之探討，私立東吳大學商學 院資訊管理學系碩士論文
3. 吳淨宜，2014，主觀知識與口碑對有機臉部保養品購買意圖影響之研究-以知覺風 險為中介變數，淡江大學國際企業學系碩士班碩士論文。
4. 吳靜怡，2014，探討沉浸理論、享樂價值與功利價值對滿意度、再購意願之影響 -以數位音樂服務平台為例，國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
5. 吳瑞萍，2014，免費線上遊戲之虛擬商品購買意圖探討， 國立高雄師範大學 事 業經營所 碩士論文。
6. 吳宛青，2011，評估社會性導覽工具對探索性檢索經驗之愉悅性的影響， 國立 臺灣大學文學院圖書資訊學系 碩士論文。
7. 周太饒，2014，以沉浸理論探討智慧型手機遊戲使用者之群集分析， 國立交通 大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
8. 施昌杞，2014，網路購物知覺互動性、體驗價值和網購意圖之關聯性研究－以 P 購 物網站為例， 國立台灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文。
9. 袁子蓮，2011，影響微網誌社群成員實際使用因素之研究-以 Facebook 粉絲專頁 為例，國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
10. 陳祈年，2005，動機、可玩性與社交性對多人線上角色扮演遊戲玩家沉浸經驗之 影響， 國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
11. 陳佩汶，2014，信任與購買經驗對網路購物意圖之干擾效果，淡江大學國際企業
59 學系碩士班碩士論文
12. 莊丙農，2008，從沈浸理論探討免費線上遊戲玩家對購買電腦周邊產品行為意圖 之研究，國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班經營管理組碩士論文。
13. 黃昆山，2012，以沉浸理論探討臉書遊戲商品購買意願， 國立中央大學資訊管 理研究所碩士論文。
14. 廖俊順，2010，影響社群成員實際使用微網誌社群因素之研究， 國立東華大學 企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
15. 劉裕順，2011，網路商店實際使用行為前置因素之研究， 國立東華大學企業管 理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
16. 潘明全，2009，網路購物參考價格與促銷情境對購買意願的影響-廣告代言人為干 擾變數之研究，行銷評論，第 6 卷，第 4 期，529-548。
17. 蔡崇仁，2005，不同思考風格玩家在遊戲中解決問題的行為分析， 國立國立交 通大學電機資訊學院資訊學程碩士論文。
18. 蔡依靜，2011，線上購物意願之實證研究：科技接受模式之延伸， 國立屏東科 技大學企業管理研究所 碩士論文。
19. 鍾元豪，2013，從沉浸理論探討消費者網路購買意圖， 國立東華大學企業管理 學系碩士論文。
20. 蘇裔翔，2009，以沉浸理論探討網路口碑效果─以手機討論區與美食討論區為例，
銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士學位論文。
21. 許士軍，1987，管理學，台北：東華書局。
22. 張春興，1992，現代心理學，台北：東華書局。
23. 張春興，2000，教育心理──三化取向，台北：華東書局。
24. 張宏文、邱文芳，1996，實用人際關係學，台北市：商鼎文化。
60
61
二、英文文獻
1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
2. Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R. and Sawyer, A. (1997). Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 38-53.
3. Argyle, M. (1996). The Social Psychology of Leisure. New York: Penguin.
4. Berlyne, D. E. (1962). Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. In Koch, Sigmund (Ed), (Psychology: A study of a science. Study II: Empirical substructure and relations with other sciences. Volume 5. The Process Areas, the Person, and Some Applied Fields: Their Place in Psychology and in Science. (pp. 284-364). New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.
5. Blattberg, R.C., & Deighton, J. (1991). Interactive marketing: Exploiting the age of addressability. Sloan Management Review,33(1), 5-14.
6. Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. S. (1999). Optimal experience of web activities.
Computers in human behavior, 15(5), 585-608.
7. Choi, D. S. and Kim, J. (2004), Why people continue to play online games: In search of critical design factors to increase customer loyalty to online contents. Cyberpsychology
＆ Behavior, 7(1), 11-24.
8. Clarke, G. S., & Haworth, T. J. (1994). Flow experience in the daily lives of sixth-form college students. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 511-523.
62
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety:
Jossey-Bass.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness, 15-35.
11. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815.
12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. Theories of creativity, 4(1), 61-91.
13. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
14. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
15. Deighton, J. (1996). The future of interactive marketing. Harvard Business Review, 151-166.
16. Dodds, W. B. and Kent B. Monron, 1985, The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 12, Elizabeth Hirschman and Morris Holbrook, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 85-90.
17. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). The effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
18. Ducheneaut, N., Moore, R. J., & Nickell, E. (2004). Designing for sociability in massively
63
multiplayer games: an examination of the third places of SWG.68
19. Ellis, M. J. (1973). Why people play. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
20. Esbjörnsson, M., Juhlin, O., & Ö stergen, M. (2003). Motorcycling and social interaction:
design for the enjoyment of brief traffic encounters. Paper presented at the Proceedings of
the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work.
21. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research Reading, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
22. Ghani, R. S., & Rooney, P. (1991).The experience of Flow in computer-mediated and in face-to-face group. In J. I. DeGross , I. Benbasat, G. DeSantis & C.M. Beath (Eds.), Proceeding of the 12thInternational Conference on Information System (229-237). New
York: ICIS.
23. Ha, L., & James, E. L. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 457-474.
24. Heeter, C. (2000). Interactivity in the context of designed experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1), 3-14.
25. Heise, D. R. (2007). Expressive order: Confirming sentiments in social actions: Springer.
26. Hoffman L. D., Kalsbeek D. W., & Novak, P. T. (1996). Internet and web use in the U.S.
Communications of The ACM, 39(12), 36-46.
27. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 50-68
28. Hutt, C. (1971). Exploration and play in children. In R.E. Herron,& B.
Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Child’s play. (231-251). New York : Wiley.
29. Korzaan, M. L. (2003). Going with the flow: Predicting online purchase intentions.
64
Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(4), 25-31.
30. Lin, H.F., 2007. Predicting consumer intentions to shop online: an empirical test of competing theories, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(6), 433–442.
31. Massimini, Fausto ＆ Massimo Carli (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience, in Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, New York: Cambridge University Press, 266-87.
32. McAlister, Leigh, A (1982). Dynamic Attribute Satiation Model of Variety-Seeking Behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, September, 1982, 141-150.
33. Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context.
Information and Management, 38(4), 217-230.
34. Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which ‘intenders’ actually buy. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 391-405.
35. Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22-42.
36. Penelope S. and Peta W., 2005, Game Flow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 3(3), Article 3A.
37. Privette, G., & Bundrick, C. M. (1987). Measurement of experience: Construct and content validity of the experience questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65(1), 315-332.
38. Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2005). An investigation into the effects of Text-To-Speech voice and 3D avatars on the perception of presence and flow of live help in electronic
65
commerce. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(4), 329-355.
39. Rafaeli, S. (1988), Interactivity: From new media to communication, In
Hawkins, R. P., Wiemann, J. M. and Pingree, S. (Eds.), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes, 16(1), 110-134, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
40. Rafaeli, S. and Sudweeks, F., (1997), Networked Interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated communication, 2(4), 1-10.
41. Rao, A. R., &Monroe, K. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name 72 on buyers' perceptions of product quality: an integrative review. Journal of marketing Research, 26(3), 351-357.
42. Raju, P. S. (1980). Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics, and Exploratory Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 272-282.
43. Reijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments.
Computers & Education, 49(2), 176-192.
44. Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer Behavior, 7th: Prentice Hall, Inc.
45. Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1), 53-67.
46. Schmitt, C. A., & Lowe, S. W. (1999). Apoptosis and therapy. The Journal of pathology, 187(1), 127-137.
47. Shih, C. F. (1998). Conceptualizing consumer experience in cyberspace. European Journal of Marketing, 32 (7/8), 655-663.
66
48. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Willey and Sons.
49. Spears & Singh (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions.
Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.
50. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining tele-presence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93.
51. Thorson, K. S., & Rodgers, S. (2006). Relationships between blogs as eWOM and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and para-social interaction. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 39-50.
52. Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication research, 19(5), 539-573.
53. Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004). Predicting consumer intentions to use online shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Information and Management,41(6), 747-762.
54. Webster, J., Trevino, K. L. and Ryan, L. (1993), The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions, Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411-426 55. Williams, F., Rice, R. E., and Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research methods and the new media.
New York: Free Press
56. Wu, S. I. (2006), A comparison of the behavior of different customer clusters towards Internet bookstores, Information & Management, 43(8), 986-1001
57. Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M. and Rho, J. (2005), Extending the TAM for a t-commerce, Information & Management, 42(7), 965-976.
67
58. Zagal, J. P., Nussbaum, M. & Rosas, R. (2000). A model to support the design of multiplayer games. Presence, 9(5)October 2002, 448-462.
59. Zhang, J. (2012, June). Facebook: Compelling growth, but fairly valued; initiating with equal weight and $29., Retrieved June2, 2014, from http://seekingalpha.com/article/
682131
-facebook-compelling-growth-but-fairly-valued-initiating-with-equal-weight-and-29-targ et.
三、網路資料
1. 科技資訊室(2013)。行動裝置驅動2015年全球遊戲市場將達1,110億美元，2013年11 月04日。取自http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/post/Read.aspx?PostID=8954
2. 科技資訊室(2013)。預估2013年美國行動遊戲營收達17.8億美元，2013年06月03日。
取自http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/post/Read.aspx?PostID=8954 3. MIC (2014)。行動遊戲娛樂持續增溫，2014年04月28日。取自
http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/pressroom/press01_pop.asp?sno=356&type1=2 4. 巴哈姆特 (2015)。行動遊戲娛樂持續增溫，2015年02月04日。取自
http://gnn.gamer.com.tw/9/110489.html
68
69
70
71
72
【第九部份】實際使用。(請在空格中打「ˇ」，選出符合你的情形的答案) 定義：行動遊戲的遊戲玩家之實際使用行為因素
9-1 你一個月會使用行動遊戲幾次？□一次以下□一個月一次□一個月 2-3 次 □一個月數次□每天一次□每天數次 9-2 你多常遊玩行動遊戲？
□極少使用□不常使用□偶爾使用□經常使用□相當頻繁□非常頻繁 9-3 你平均每一周遊玩多少次行動遊戲？□約每周一次□每周 2-5 次
□每周 5-8 次□每周 11-15 次□每周 15-18 次□每周 18 次以上
前測建議
針對以上的題目，是否有題意不清楚或者是需要修正的地方?
答：
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
問卷到此結束，請檢查有無遺漏之處。
非常謝謝您的協助與幫忙。