第五章 結論與建議
第三節 未來研究之建議
一、 延續並擴大收集文獻之年份與範圍
就研究對象之時間來說，本研究是以 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日 所發表之資訊科技融入數學科教學相關文獻進行分析，但資訊科技融入數學科教 學之相關研究會不斷地累積，所以未來研究可以將時間延長，以更加了解資訊科 技融入數學科教學之概況，也許會有令人意想不到的發現。
就研究對象之教育階段來說，本研究是以中、小學為主，然而，許多大專院 校之數學相關課程也實施資訊科技融入教學，故未來研究可以將教育階段擴大至 大專院校，進而更加了解資訊科技融入數學科教學之整體情況。
二、 資訊科技融入各領域之教學
由於資訊科技融入教學於各個學習領域是一個整體趨勢，因此，除了數學科 之外，其他科目亦應進行系統性文獻分析，檢視科技工具在各個學科之融入情形，
使各科教師能對資訊科技融入教學更加了解，並且能適時且適當地將科技工具融 入其教學中，也能更加了解學生之學習情況，並於教學上做適當地調整，進而提 升教學效益。
參考資料
參考文獻
英文部分
Abu-Naja, M. (2008). The influence of graphic calculators on secondary school pupils' ways of thinking about the topic " Positivity and negativity of functions".
International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 103-118.
Aktas, M., Bulut, M., & Yuksel, T. (2011). The effect of using computer animations and activities about teaching patterns in primary mathematics. Turkish Online
Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 273-277.
Anderson, W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and
assessing: A revision of Bloom’s educational objectives. NY: Longamn.
Andrews, R., Burn, A., Leach, J., Locke, T., Low, G., & Torgerson, C. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of networked ICT on 5–16 year olds’literacy in English (EPPI-Centre Review). In: Research Evidence in Education Library. Issue 1. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215-241.
Bai, H., Pan, W., Hirumi, A., & Kebritchi, M. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of a 3‐D instructional game on improving mathematics achievement and motivation of middle school students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 993-1003.
Baki, A., & Güveli, E. (2008). Evaluation of a web based mathematics teaching material on the subject of functions. Computers & Education, 51(2), 854-863.
Biza, I. (2011). Students’ evolving meaning about tangent line with the mediation of a dynamic geometry environment and an instructional example space. Technology,
Knowledge and Learning, 16(2), 125-151.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956).
Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York:
David McKay, 19(56).
Bolyard, J., & Moyer-Packenham, P. (2012). Making sense of integer arithmetic: The effect of using virtual manipulatives on students’ representational fluency. Journal
of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(2), 93-113.
Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. M. (2010). Virtual manipulatives: What they are and how teachers can use them. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45(3), 186-191.
Bronson, D. E., & Davis, T. S. (2011). Finding and Evaluating Evidence: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-based Practice. Oxford University Press.
Brown, J. (2004). A Difficult Function. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 60(2), 6-11.
Burns, B. A., & Hamm, E. M. (2011). A comparison of concrete and virtual manipulative use in third‐and fourth‐grade mathematics. School Science and
Mathematics, 111(6), 256-261.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Lin, S. F. (2006). Computer-assisted learning for mathematical problem solving. Computers & Education, 46(2), 140-151.
Chang, K. E., Wu, L. J., Weng, S. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2012). Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning.
Computers & Education, 58(2), 775-786.
Chen, Y. H., Looi, C. K., Lin, C. P., Shao, Y. J., & Chan, T. W. (2012). Utilizing a collaborative cross number puzzle game to develop the computing ability of addition and subtraction. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 354-366.
Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review,9, 88-113.
Christmann, E. P., & Badgett, J. L. (2003). A meta-analytic comparison of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on elementary students’ academic achievement. I nformation Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2003 (1), 91-104.
Denise E. Bronson, Tamara S. Davis. (2012). Finding and Evaluating Evidence:
Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Practice. Pocket guides to social work research methods. Oxford University Press.
Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., &
Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research?
A critical perspective. Qualitative research, 6(1), 27-44.
Doerr, H. M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 143-163.
Edwards, J., & Roblyer, M. D. (2000). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Merill, Upper Saddler river, NJ.
Ellington, A. J. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students' achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, 433-463.
Ellington, A. J. (2006). The Effects of Non‐CAS Graphing Calculators on Student Achievement and Attitude Levels in Mathematics: A Meta‐Analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 106(1), 16-26.
EPPI-Centre Web Site. (2012). Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre). Retrieved December 12 ,2012 from the World Wide Web: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/.
Erbas, A. K., & Yenmez, A. A. (2011). The effect of inquiry-based explorations in a dynamic geometry environment on sixth grade students’ achievements in polygons. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2462-2475.
Evans, J., & Benefield, P. (2001). Systematic reviews of educational research: does the medical model fit?. British educational research journal, 27(5), 527-541.
Feldman, K. A. (1971). Using the work of others: Some observations on reviewing and integrating. Sociology of Education, 44(1), 86-102.
Figueira-Sampaio, A. D. S., dos Santos, E. E. F., & Carrijo, G. A. (2009). A constructivist computational tool to assist in learning primary sc hool mathematical equations. Computers & Education, 53(2), 484-492.
Forster, P. A. (2006). Assessing technology-based approaches for teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and
Technology, 37(2), 145-164.
Forster, P. A. (2007). Technologies for teaching and learning about box plots and statistical analysis. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics
Education, 14(3), 137-146.
Garcia, M. D. M., & Romero, I. M. (2009). The influence of new technologies on the evolution of learning and attitudes towards mathematics in secondary students.
Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(1), 369-395.
Ghosh, J. (2004). Exploring concepts in probability: Using graphics calculators.
Australian Mathematics Teacher, 60(3), 25-31.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews.
Sage Publications.
Graham*, T., & Smith, P. (2004). An investigation into the use of graphics calculators with pupils in Key Stage 2. International Journal of Mathematical Education in
Science and Technology, 35(2), 227-237.
Gürbüz, R., & Birgin, O. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted teaching remedying misconceptions: The case of the subject “probability”. Computers &
Education, 58(3), 931-941.
Guven, B. (2012). Using dynamic geometry software to improve eight grade students' understanding of transformation geometry. Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology, 28(2), 364-382.
Harries, T., & Suggate, J. (2006). Exploring links across representations of numbers with young children. International journal for technology in mathematics
education, 13(2).53-64.
Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., & Watling, R.
(2002). ImpaCT2: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA).
Harskamp, E., & Suhre, C. (2007). Schoenfeld’s problem solving theory in a student controlled learning environment. Computers & Education, 49(3), 822-839.
Hauptman, H. (2010). Enhancement of spatial thinking with Virtual Spaces 1.0.
Computers & Education, 54(1), 123-135.
Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2001). Software tools for geometrical problem solving:
Potentials and pitfalls. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical
Learning, 6(3), 235-256.
Hembree, R., & Dessart, D. J. (1986). Effects of hand-held calculators in precollege mathematics education: A meta-analysis. Journal for research in mathematics
education,17(2), 83-99.
Higgins, J. P., & Greens, S. (Ed.). (2006). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 (updated September 2006). Retrieved December 16, 2012 from the world wide web
http://www.cochrane .org/resources/handbook/hbook.htm.
Hurme, T. R., & Järvelä, S. (2005). Students’ activity in computer-supported
collaborative problem solving in mathematics. International Journal of
Computers for mathematical learning, 10(1), 49-73.
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., & Hsu, R. L. (2006). Development and evaluation of multimedia whiteboard system for improving mathematical problem solving.
Computers & Education, 46(2), 105-121.
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., & Yang, Y. L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191-212.
Hwang, W. Y., Su, J. H., Huang, Y. M., & Dong, J. J. (2009). A study of multi-representation of geometry problem solving with virtual manipulatives and whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 229-247.
Iskander, W., & Curtis, S. (2005). Use of colour and interactive animation in learning 3D vectors. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(2), 149-156.
Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: students' interpretations when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educational studies in mathematics, 44(1-2), 55-85.
Ke, F. (2008). Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning.
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4),
429-445.Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Gameplaying for maths learning: cooperative or not?.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 249-259.
Kidron, I., & Zehavi, N. (2002). The role of animation in teaching the limit concept.
International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 9(3),
205-27.Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2006). Cognitive tools and mindtools for collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 199-209.
Koklu, O., & Topcu, A. (2012). Effect of Cabri-assisted instruction on secondary school students’ misconceptions about graphs of quadratic functions.
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,
43(8), 999-1011.
Kong, S. C. (2008). The development of a cognitive tool for teaching and learning fractions in the mathematics classroom: A design-based study. Computers &
Education, 51(2), 886-899.
Kong, S. C. (2011). An evaluation study of the use of a cognitive tool in a one-to-one classroom for promoting classroom-based dialogic interaction. Computers &
Education, 57(3), 1851-1864.
Kong, S. C., & Kwok, L. F. (2005). A cognitive tool for teaching the addition/subtraction of common fractions: A model of affordances. Computers &
Education, 45(2), 245-265.
Kordaki, M. (2003). The effect of tools of a computer microworld on students' strategies regarding the concept of conservation of area. Educational Studies in
Mathematics, 52(2), 177-209.
Kordaki, M., & Balomenou, A. (2006). Challenging students to view the concept of area in triangles in a broad context: Exploiting the features of Cabri-II.
International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(1), 99-135.
Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self‐regulated learning be supported in mathematical E‐learning environments?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
22(1), 24-33.
Kramarski, B., & Ritkof, R. (2002). The effects of metacognition and email interactions on learning graphing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 33-43.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview.Theory into
practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Kynigos, C., & Latsi, M. (2006). Vectors in use in a 3D Juggling game simulation.
International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 3-10.
Lai, K., & White, T. (2012). Exploring quadrilaterals in a small group computing environment. Computers & Education, 59(3), 963-973.
Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., Tan, N. C., Lin, C. P., & Chang, K. E. (2010).
Mobile-device-supported problem-based computational estimation Instruction for elementary school students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 55-69.
Lee, C. Y., & Chen, M. P. (2009). A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: The effects of type of question prompt and level
of prior knowledge. Computers & Education, 52(3), 530-542.
Leng, N. W. (2011). Using an advanced graphing calculator in the teaching and learning of calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science
and Technology, 42(7), 925-938.
Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2008). Technology in mathematics classroom: A meta-analysis of the recent literature. i-manager’s Journal School Educational Technology, 3(4), 34-54.
Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215-243.
Lin, C. P., Shao, Y. J., Wong, L. H., Li, Y. J., & Niramitranon, J. (2011). The impact of using synchronous collaborative virtual tangram in children's geometric. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 250-258.
Looi, C. K., & Lim, K. S. (2009). From bar diagrams to letter‐symbolic algebra: a technology‐enabled bridging. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(4), 358-374.
Marrades, R., & Gutiérrez, Á . (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational studies in mathematics, 44(1-2), 87-125.
Martin, P., & Velay, J. L. (2012). Do computers improve the drawing of a geometrical figure for 10 year-old children?. International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 22(1), 13-23.
McLeod, J., Vasinda, S., & Dondlinger, M. J. (2012). Conceptual visibility and virtual dynamics in technology-scaffolded learning environments for conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science
Teaching, 31(3), 283-310.
Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation: A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(2), 40-42.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of
internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance
Education, 3(2), 1-7.
Moyer, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., & Spikell, M. A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives?.
Teaching children mathematics, 8(6), 372-377.
Moyer, P. S., Salkind, G., & Bolyard, J. J. (2008). Virtual manipulatives used by K-8 teachers for mathematics instruction: The influence of mathematical, cognitive, and pedagogical fidelity. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher
Education, 8(3), 202-218.
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Bolyard, J. J. (2002). Exploring representation in the middle grades: Investigations in geometry with virtual manipulatives. The
Australian Mathematics Teacher, 58(1), 19-25.
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Suh, J. M. (2012). Learning mathematics with technology:
The influence of virtual manipulatives on different achievement groups. Journal
of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(1), 39-59.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston VA: The Council.
Nguyen, D. M., & Kulm, G. (2005). Using web-based practice to enhance mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(3), 1-16.
Nguyen, D. M., Hsieh, Y. C., & Allen, G. D. (2006). The impact of web-based assessment and practice on students’ mathematics learning attitudes. Journal of
Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(3), 251-279.
Ogle, T., Branch, M., Christmas, O., Clement, J., Fillion, J., Goddard, E., & Vinson, M. (2002). Technology in Schools: Suggestions, Tools and Guidelines for Assessing Technology in Elementary and Secondary Education.
Ozgun-Koca, S. A. (2008). Ninth grade students studying the movement of fish to learn about linear relationships：The use of video-based analysis software in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 15-25.
Ozgun-Koca, S. A., & Edwards, T. (2011). Hands-on, minds-on or both? A discussion of the development of a mathematics activity by using virtual and physical manipulatives. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(4), 389-402.
Papadopoulos, I., & Dagdilelis, V. (2008). Students’ use of technological tools for verification purposes in geometry problem solving. The Journal of Mathematical
Behavior, 27(4), 311-325.
Ploger, D., Klingler, L., & Rooney, M. (1997). Spreadsheets, patterns, and algebraic thinking. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3(6), 330-334.
Rahim, M. H. (2002). A classroom use of the Geometer's Sketchpad in a mathematics pre-service teacher education program. Retrieved February, 22, 2002.
Reimer, K., & Moyer, P. S. (2005). Third-graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and
Science Teaching, 24(1), 5-25.
Roblyer, M.D., & Doering, A.H. (2010). Integrating educational technology into teaching. United States, Allyn & Bacon.
Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M., &
Claro, S. (2010). Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: impact on students’ mathematics learning. Educational Technology
Research and Development, 58(4), 399-419.
Santos-Trigo, M. (2004). The role of dynamic software in the identification and construction of mathematical relationships. Journal of Computers in Mathematics
and Science Teaching, 23(4), 399-413.
Sayeski, K. L. (2008). Virtual manipulatives as an assistive technology support for students with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Special Education
Technology, 23(1), 47-53.
Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Schuh, J. (2010). The acquisition of problem-solving skills in mathematics: How animations can aid understanding of structural problem features and solution procedures. Instructional Science, 38(5), 487-502.
Sedig, K. (2008). From play to thoughtful learning: A design strategy to engage children with mathematical representations. Journal of Computers in
Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(1), 65-101.
Sinclair, M. P. (2003). Some implications of the results of a case study for the design of pre-constructed, dynamic geometry sketches and accompanying materials.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 289-317.
Song, K. S., & Lee, W. Y. (2002). A virtual reality application for geometry classes.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 149-156.
Steen, K., Brooks, D., & Lyon, T. (2006). The impact of virtual manipulatives on first
grade geometry instruction and learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics
and Science Teaching, 25(4), 373-391.
Stohl, H., & Tarr, J. E. (2002). Developing notions of inference using probability simulation tools. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(3), 319-337.
Suh, J. (2010). Leveraging cognitive technology tools to expand opportunities for critical thinking in elementary mathematics. Journal of Computers in
Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29(3), 289-302.
Suh, J., & Moyer-Packenham, P. (2007). Developing students’ representational fluency using virtual and physical algebra balances. Journal of Computers in Mathematics
and Science Teaching, 26(2), 155-173.
Suh, J., Moyer, P. S., & Heo, H. (2005). Examining technology uses in the classroom:
Developing fraction sense using virtual manipulative concept tutorials. Journal of
Interactive Online Learning, 3(4), 1-21.
Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2008). Understanding equivalence of symbolic expressions in a spreadsheet-based environment. International Journal of
Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13(1), 27-46.
Tabach, M., Hershkowitz, R., & Arcavi, A. (2008). Learning beginning algebra with spreadsheets in a computer intensive environment. The Journal of Mathematical
Behavior, 27(1), 48-63.
Tajudin, M., Ahmad Tarmizi, R., Wan Ali, W. Z., & Konting, M. M. (2007). The Effects of Using Graphic Calculators in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics.
Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 1(1), 45-61.
Tarmizi, R. A., Ali, W. Z. W., & Konting, M. M. (2011). The use of graphic calculator in teaching and learning of mathematics: Effects on performance and metacognitive awareness. American International Journal of Contemporary
Research, 1(1), 59-72.
Topcu, A. (2011). Effects of using spreadsheets on secondary school students’
self-efficacy for algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in
Science and Technology, 42(5), 605-613.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review.
British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222.
Tsuei, M. (2012). Using synchronous peer tutoring system to promote elementary
students’ learning in mathematics. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1171-1182.
Ubuz, B., Üstün, I., & Erbaş, A. K. (2009). Effect of dynamic geometry environment on immediate and retention level achievements of seventh grade students.
Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (35), 147-164.
Wang, C. S., & Li, C. C. (2000). An assessment framework for information technology integrated instruction. In ICCE (International Conference on Computers in Education)/ICCAI (International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction ).
Wei, C. S., & Ismail, Z. (2010). Peer interactions in computer-supported collaborative learning using dynamic mathematics software. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 8, 600-608.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2011). What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 2.1). Retrieved December 12 ,2012 from the World Wide Web: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.
Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students' regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 33(2), 189-217.
Wong, W. K., Yin, S. K., Yang, H. H., & Cheng, Y. H. (2011). Using computer-assisted multiple representations in learning geometry proofs. Journal
of Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 43-54.
Wu, Y., & Wong, K. Y. (2007). Impact of a spreadsheet exploration on secondary school students’ understanding of statistical graphs. Journal of Computers in
Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(4), 355-385.
Yang, D. C., & Tsai, Y. F. (2010). Promoting sixth graders’ number sense and learning attitudes via technology-based environment. Educational Technology & Society,
13(4), 112–125.
Yelland, N. (2002). Creating microworlds for exploring mathematical understandings in the early years of school. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(1), 77-92.
Yuan, Y. (2005). Design of virtual manipulatives for mathematical explorations using Flash ActionScript. In Proceedings of the 10th Asia Technology Conference in Mathematics (pp. 183-192).
Zazkis, R., Dubinsky, E., & Dautermann, J. (1996). Coordinating visual and analytic strategies: A study of students' understanding of the group d4. Journal for
research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 435-457.
Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using
wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & education, 42(3), 289-314.
中文部分
王珀芬（2010）。資訊科技融入教學對國中小學生學習成效影響之後設分析。未 出版博士論文，國立台南大學，台南市。
江玉玲（2009）。數學虛擬教具對等值分數概念學習的影響。國立台灣師範大學 資訊教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，台北市。
何榮桂（2002）。台灣資訊教育的現況與發展-兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教 育，87，22-48。
張國恩（1999）。資訊融入各科教學之內涵與實施。資訊與教育雙月刊，72，2-9。
李曉萍（2010）。互動式電子白板運用於三年級數學教學之行動研究-以「數與量」
概念及「幾何」概念為例。未出版碩士論文，台北市立教育大學，台北市。
陳惠邦（2006）。互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考。發表於台北市主辦：全 球華人資訊教育創新論壇，2006 年 12 月 19 日於宜蘭。線上檢索日期：2014 年 3 月 31 日。
姚念廷（2009）。數學動態學習環境製作之研究。國立交通大學理學院碩士在職 專班網路學習學程碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
林保平（1995）。在動態、互動、可操作的電腦環境下探討 ax+by=n 之非負整數 解。科學教育研究與發展，1，40-49。
林保平（2004）。公切圓之圓心軌跡－用動態幾何軟體探討幾何性質。科學教育 月刊，271，2-9。
黃美齡（2009）。運用 EME Model 於帶分數、假分數及其互換之教學研究。未出
黃美齡（2009）。運用 EME Model 於帶分數、假分數及其互換之教學研究。未出