• 沒有找到結果。

未來研究方向與建議

第五章 結論與建議

5.2 未來研究方向與建議

本研究之理論模型,係修正一般傳統經常帳現值估計模型,考量貨幣變動的 影響,以六大工業化國家含貨幣效果的經常帳現值估計模型進行分析,加強了貨 幣與經常帳之間的關聯性。亦即利用與經濟活動有密切關係的訊息,來預測美 國、英國、法國、德國、日本及加拿大等國經常帳的態動走勢。此種關聯經由 Granger 因果關係檢定之後,確實發現在非線性模型下,各國的經常帳餘額顯著 地受到貨幣存量變動之影響。因此,政府在制定貨幣政策時,應該更為謹慎。

但是,在預測精確性檢定的結果上,我們卻發現,法國的資料有大部份的檢 定皆無法判別出線性或非線性 VAR 模型何者預測能力較佳。因此,本研究建議,

可再修正傳統經常帳現值估計模型,加入諸如利率、匯率等等重要且會影響經常 帳餘額變動的解釋變數,進一步探討這些因素是否能增加模型的解釋能力,以提 高非線性 VAR 模型的預測力。

最後,由於本文研究的對象主要是針對已開發國家,因此,我們建議在後續 研究中亦可將開發中國家的資料納入,或者仿照 Ghosh and Ostry (1995) 的作 法,將國家以分區的方式進行分析,探討使用非線性 VAR 模型來預測開發中國 家的經常帳餘額,是否也能得到較佳的預測能力。

參考文獻

楊奕農 (2005),「時間序列分析—經濟與財務上之應用」,第一版,雙葉書廊有 限公司,台北。

Agenor, P. R., Bismut, C., Cashin, P., and McDermott, C. J. (1999). Consumption Smoothing and the Current Account: Evidence for France, 1970-1996.

Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol.18, pp.1-12.

Baharumshah, A. Z., and Liew, V. K. (2006). Forecasting Performance of Exponential Smooth Transition Autoregressive Exchange Rate Models. Open

Economies Review, Vol. 17, pp. 235-251.

Belloc, M., and Gandolfo, G. (2005). The Current Account-Interest Rate Relation as a Nonlinear Phenomenon. The Journal of International Trade & Economic

Developmetn, Vol. 14, pp.145-166.

Bergin, P. R., and Sheffrin, S. M. (2000). Interest rates, Exchange Rates and Present Value Models of the Current Account. The Economic Journal, Vol.110, pp.535-558.

Campbell, J. (1987). Does Saving Anticipate Declining Labor Income? An Alternative Test of the Permanent Income Hypothesis. Econometrics, Vol.55, No. 6, pp.1249-1273.

Campbell, J. Y., and Mankiw, N. G. (1989). Permanent Income, Current Income and Consumption. NBER Working Paper, No. 2436.

Campbell, J. Y., and Shiller, R. J. (1987). Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models. Journal of Political Economy, Vol.6, pp.1249-1273.

Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American

Statistical Assoication, Vol. 74, No. 366, pp.427-431.

Diebold, F. X., and Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing Predictive Accuracy. Journal of

Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 13, No.3, pp.134-144.

Enders, W. (2004). Applied Economertric Time Series, 2nd ed., New York: John Willey and Sons Inc.

Franses, P. H., and van Dijk, D. (2000). Non-Linear Time Series Models in Empirical

Finance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Fuller, W. (1976). Introduction to Statistical Time Series. New York: John Wiley.

Ghosh, A. R. (1995). International Capital Mobility Amongst the Major Industrialised Countries: too Little or too Much? The Economic Journal, Vol.105, pp.107-128.

Ghosh, A. R., and Ostry, J. D. (1995). The Current Account in Developing Countries:

A Perspective from the Consumption-Smoothing Approach. The World

Bank Economic Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp.305-333.

Goldfeld, S. M., and Quandt, R. (1972). Nonlinear Methods in Econometrics, North Holland, Amsterdam.

Granger, C.W. J., and Newbold, P. (1974). Experience with Forecasting Univariate Time Series and the Combination of Forecasts. Journal of the Royal

Statistical Society, Vol.137, No. 2, pp.131-165.

Granger, C. W. J., and Terasvirta, T. (1993). Modeling Nonlinear Economic

Relationships, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Hall, R. E. (1978). Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.

86, No. 6, pp.971-987.

Hall, K. V., and Buckle, R. A. (2001). New Zealand’s Current Account Deficit: an Analysis based on the Intertemporal Optimisation Approach. New

Zealand Treasury Working Paper.

<http://www.treasury.govt.nz/workingpapers/2001/01-2.asp>

Huang, J. H. (2003). Investigating Nonlinearity in the Canadian Business Cycle Using STAR Models. Departmetn of Economics, University of Alberta, Canada.

Iscan, T. B. (2002). Present Value Tests of the Current Account with Durables Consumption.

Journal of international Money and Finance, Vol.21,

pp.385-412.

Kano, T. (2003). A Structural VAR Approach to the Intertemporal Model of the Current Account. Bank of Canada Working Paper, Vol.42.

Lutkepohl, H., Terasvirta, T., and Wolters, J. (1999). Investigating Stability and Linearity of a German M1 Money Demand Function. Journal of Applied

Econometrics, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp.511-525.

Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P., and Terasvirta, T. (1988). Testing Linearity against Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models. Biometrika, Vol.75, pp.491-499.

Maddala, D. S. (1977). Econometrics, McGraw Hill, New York.

Milbourne, R., and Otto, G. (1992). Consumption Smoothing and the Current Account.

Australian Economic Papers, Vol.31, pp.369-384.

Obstfeld, M. (1982). Aggregate Spending and the Terms of Trade: Is there a Laursen-Metzler Effect? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 97, No.2, pp.251-270.

Otto, G. (1992). Testing a Present-Value Model of the Current Account: Evidence from US and Canadian Time Series. Journal of international Money and

Finance, Vol.11, pp.414-430.

Phillips, P. C. B. (1995). Fully Modified Least Squares and Vector Autoregression.

Econometrics, Vol.63, pp.1023-1078.

Phillips, P. C. B., and Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes. Review of economic Studies, Vol. 57, pp.99-125.

Prescott, E. C. (1986). Theory Ahead of Business Cycle Measurement. Federal

Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, Vol.10, pp.9-12.

Quandt, R. E. (1958). The Estimation of the Parameters of a Linear Regression System Obeying Two Separate Regimes. Journal of the American

Statistical Association, Vol. 53, No. 284, pp.873-880.

Rapach, D. E., and Wohar, M. E. (2006). The Out-of-Sample Forecasting Performance of Nonlinear Models of Real Exchange Rate Behavior. International

Institute of Forecasters, pp.341-361.

Rothman, P (1998). Forecasting Asymmetric Unemployment Rates. The Review of

Economics and statistics, Vol. 80, No. 1, pp.164-168.

Sachs, J. D. (1981). The Current Account in the Macroeconomic Adjustment Process.

Scandianvian Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, pp.147-159.

Sheffrin, S. M., and Woo, W. T. (1990). Present Value Test of an Intertemporal Model of the Current Account. Journal of International Economics, Vol.29, pp.237-253.

Svensson, L. E. O., and Razin, A (1983). The Terms of Trade and the Current Account:

The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Effect. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 91, No.1, pp.97-125.

Terasvirta, T. (1994). Specification, Estimation, and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol.89, No. 425, pp.208-218.

Teräsvirta, T. (1998). Modeling Economic Relationships with Smooth Transtition Regressions, in A. Ullah and D. Giles (eds). Handbook of Applied

Economic Statistics, Dekker, New York, pp.229-246.

Teräsvirta, T. (2004). Smooth Transition Regression Modeling, in H. Lütkepohl and M. Krätzig (eds). Applied Time Series Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Terasvirta, T., and Anderson, H. M. (1992). Characterizing Nonlinearities in Business Cycles Using Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models. Journal of

Applied Econometrics, Vol. 7, pp.119-136.

Tiao, G. C., and Tsay, R. S. (1994). Some Advances in Non-linear and Adaptive Modelling in Time-Series. Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 13, pp.109-131.

Tong, H. (1978). On a Threshold Model, in C.H Chen (eds). Pattern Recognition and

Signal Processing, Amsterdam: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, pp.101-141.

Tong, H.(1990). Non-Linear Time Series: A Dynamical System Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Tong, H., and Lim K. S. (1980). Threshold Autoregressions, Limit Cycles, and Data.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, pp.245-292.

van Dijk, D., and Terasvirta, T., and Franses, P. H. (2002). Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models- A Survey of Recent Developments. Econometric

Reviews, Vol.21, pp.1-47.

Wallis, K. F. (2001). Chi-squared Tests of Interval and Density Forecasts, and the Bank of England’s Fan Charts. International Journal of Forecasting, Vol.19, pp.165–175.

Weng, Ming-Jang (2001). Recent Developments of the Intertemporal Current Accounts in the US and Japan. Mimeo.

附錄 A

在 no-Ponzi game 及截斷條件(terminal condition) 成立下由於

1 0

上式中,等號左邊代表終身消費的折現值 (present-value of lifetime consumption, PVLC),等號右邊代表終身所擁有資源的折現值 (present-value of lifetime resources, PVLR)。

附錄 B

利用 Bellman’s equation,價值函數為 (value function):

)

首先,我們解B1

最後我們將 (B.5)、(B.10) 及 (B.13) 式代入 (B.7) 後,即可求得 (3.9) 式為

[

t i t i

]

i

t i

t

Q M

E r

CAm

+ +

=

Δ

⎟ Δ

⎜ ⎞

− +

=

η

1

*

1 1

其中,Δ

Q

t+i =

Q

t+i

Q

t+i1,Δ

M

t+i =

M

t+i

M

t+i1

) 1 ( 1 1

+

r

− −

=

β

η π

為貨幣效果。

相關文件