第五章 討論
第三節 研究建議與未來研究方向
本研究對未來研究之建議有二：1.建立小學生的 CWRAT 常模，發展適合小 學階段的創造潛能測量工具，以提供教師與相關人員作為教學的參考。2.發展 CWRAT 的電腦化適性測驗，根據受測者的能力挑選適中難度的試題，以期更加 有效測量個體的創造潛能。
42
43
44
黃博聖、陳學志（2013）。遠距聯想創造測驗－詞彙版本。台北：行為科學社。
黃博聖、陳學志、洪素蘋（2010）。中文詞彙遠距聯想量表之編製與信效度報告。
第九屆海峽兩岸心理與教育測驗暨 2010 NAER「永續教育發展-創新與實踐」
國際學術研討會，台北：國家教育研究院籌備處，2010 年 10 月 22 日。
黃博聖、陳學志、黃鴻程、劉政宏（2009）。「詞彙聯想策略擴散性思考測驗」之 編製。測驗學刊，56，153-177。
黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏（2012）。中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗之編製及其信、效度 報告。測驗學刊，59，581-607。（TSSCI）
詹志禹（2005）。從演化觀點看創造力教育政策的推動——以「創意教師成長工 程」為例。教育資料集刊，30，113-142。
45
西文部分
Ansburg, P. I. (2000). Individual Differences in Problem Solving via Insight. Current Psychology, 19(2), 143-146.
Bear, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 143-146.
Beeman, M. J., & Bowden, E. M. (2000). The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be-solved problems. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1231-1241.
Belcher, T. L. & Davis, G. A. (1971). Interrelationships Among Three Standardized Creativity Tests and IQ. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York. Feb 21.
Ben-Zur, H. (1989). Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semantic-memory problems. Memory and Cognition, 17, 617-626.
Bowden, E. M., & Beeman, M. J. (2003a). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35(4), 634-639.
Bowden, E. M., & Beeman, M. J. (2003b). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 730-737.
Cerruti, C. & Schlaug, G.. (2009). Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex Enhances Complex Verbal Associative Thought. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(10), 1980-1987.
Chronicle, E. P., MacGregor, J. N. & Ormerod, T. C. (2004). What makes an insight problem? The roles of Heuristics, Goal conception, and solution in knowledge-lean problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 30, 14-27.
46
Chusmir, L. H., & Koberg, C. S. (1986). Creativity differences among managers.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 240-253.
Dallob, P. I. & Dominowski, R. L. (1993). Erroneous solutions to verbal insight problems: Effects of highlighting critical material. Paper presented at the 73rd annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association. Portland, OR.
Datta, L.-E. (1964). Remote associates test as a predictor of creativity in engineers.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 48(3), 183.
Dominowski, R. L. & Dallob, P. (1995). Insight and problem solving. In R. J.
Finke, R. A. (1995). Creative insight and preinventive forms. In R. J. Sternberg
& J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 255–280). Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, E. M. (1999). Subclinical inclination toward manic-depression and creative performance on the Remote Associates Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1273-1283.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
Guildford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor & J. W.
Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37-59). Chicago: Aldine.
Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to be creative on the psychological meaning of divergent test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.
Harris, J. A. (2004). Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 913-929.
47
Hocevar, D., & Michael, W. (1979). The effects of scoring formulas on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 917-921.
Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, & R. R. Ronning (Ed), et al. Handbook of creativity. Perspectives on individual differences. (pp. 53-75). New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press.
Hsu, K., Lin, W., & Chen, H. (2011, January). Personality correlates of different creative processes: Perceptual sensitivity and effortful control as major constructs. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, USA.
Kohler, W. (1929). Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.
Lin, C. M. (1999). The effects of self-efficacy and task value on students’ commitment and achievement in web-based instruction for Taiwan higher education.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Thinking and Problem Solving (pp. 289-332). Academic Press.
Mednick, M. T. (1963). Research creativity in psychology graduate students. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27(3), 265-266.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 44(2), 220-232.
Mednick, S. A. (1968). The Remote Associates Test. Journal of Creative Behavior , 2(3), 213-214.
Ohlsson, S. (1984). Restructuring revisited: A summary and critique of the gestalt
48
theory of problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25, 67-78.
Perkins, D. N. (1990). The nature and nurture of creativity. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 415-443). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Plucker, J. A. & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, (ed), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 35-61).
Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, A. G. (1985). Sex differences in creativity among a sample of Jamaican adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 424-426.
Robinson, K. (2001). Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. Oxford : Capstone ; New York: John Wiley
Schooler, J. W. & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B.
Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.) (1995). The nature of insight (pp. 33-62). The MIT Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. New York Press.
Torrance, E.P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wakefield, J. F. (1992). Creative thinking: Problem-Solving Skills and the Art Orientation. Norwood, New Jersey.
Ward , T. B. (1995). What’s old about new ideas? In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A.
Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 157~178). Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK
Ying-Yao, C., Wen-Chung, W., Kun-Shia, L., & Yi-Ling, C. (2010). Effects of Association Instruction on Fourth Graders' Poetic Creativity in Taiwan.
Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 228-235
Zhong, C.-B., Dijksterhuis, A. & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). The Merits of Unconscious Thought in Creativity. Psychological Science, 19(9), 912-918.
49
50
51
52
53
附錄三、同儕提名問卷
親愛的同學您好：
因為研究目的想請您提名班上最有創意同學的前三名，及最沒有 創意的前三名，請仔細的想想那些同學是有創意的，而那些同學是最 沒有創意的。本問卷施測的結果將僅做研究之用，請放心的依實際狀 況作答，您的用心將對本研究有莫大的貢獻。請仔細的想想下面的問 題，並將符合問題描述同學名字寫在劃線處。謝謝您的幫忙！
國立臺灣師範大學創造力發展研究所 指導教授：陳學志博士 邱發忠博士
研究生：李孝儀
1
.你覺得你們班上誰比較有創意，如能機智的解決問題，想出新奇的 想法、點子。 （依順序列出）
1.
2.
3
2.
你覺得你們班上誰比較沒有創意，如做事較不能變通，較囿於習慣 想法（依順序列出）
1.
2.
3
54