研究限制

本研究依照研究流程進行，從資料蒐集、文獻整理、構面形成、問卷發放乃至 資料登錄分析的研究過程中，雖然力求研究方法嚴謹詳實，但受限於人力、財力及 時間等因素，仍存在以下幾點研究限制：

 研究架構方面：為避免研究架構過於複雜，僅以信任為自變項、任務衝突與關 係衝突為依變項、薪資結構作為調節變數，未能納入其餘的構面一併探討，或 許對瞭解整體研究架構的因果關係有所影響。

 研究對象方面：本研究所取樣的對象僅為銀行裡主管及非主管階級的員工，研 究結果無法概化到其他行業別公司。且受限於經費及地緣便利等因素，主要問 卷發放公司皆位在北部地區，且以台北縣市為主，少部分則為中部及南部地區 之公司，此亦本研究無法盡善之處。

參考文獻

中文部份

1. Steers, Black，韓經倫譯，組織行為學導論，五南圖書，台北，1994。

2. 田部井明美著，陳耀茂編審，共變異數構造分析AMOS使用手冊，鼎茂圖書，

台北，2005。

3. 汪明生、朱斌妤，衝突管理，五南圖書，台北，1999。

4. 林清山，「驗證性因素分析的理論及應用：修訂魏氏兒童智力量表之驗證性因 素分析」，測驗年刊，35，117 -136頁 ，1988。

5. 余民寧，潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用，高等教育，台北，2006。

6. 邱皓政，量化研究與統計分析，五南出版社，台北，2006。

7. 柯進雄，衝突理論與學校領導，台聯出版社，台北，1994。

8. 黃同圳，績效評估與管理，天下文化，1999。

9. 黃英忠，現代人力資源管理，華泰文化，台北，1993。

10. 黃英忠等編著，人力資源管理，華泰文化，1998。

11. 黃俊英，人力資源管理，華泰文化，1997。

12. 葉美玲、高美玲，「結構方程模式與線性結構關係之簡介」，護理研究，7（5），

490-497頁，1999。

13. 鄧孝純，「壽險業的績效評估與獎金制度之研究」，台灣科技大學企業管理所，

碩士論文，2000。

14. 諸承明，「薪資設計要素與組織效能關係之研究---以組織特性與任務特性為情 境變項」，國立台灣大學商學研究所，碩士論文，1995。

15. 蔡憲六，企業薪資管理，三民書局，1980。

16. 羅業勤，獎工計畫理論與實務，合勤企業管理顧問公司，1996。

外文部份

1. Amason, A. C., “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams”, Academy of Management Journal, 39 (1), pp. 123-148, 1996.

2. Amason, A. C. and Schweiger D. M., “Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making and organizational performance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), pp. 239-253, 1994.

3. Amason, A. C., and Sapienza, H. J., “The effects of top management team size and interacyive norms on cognitive and affective conflict”, Journal of Management, 23(4), pp. 495-516, 1997.

4. Anderson, E., Lodish, L. M., and Weitz, B. A., “Resource allocation behavior in conventional channels”, Journal of Marketing Research, 24(1), pp. 85-97, 1987.

5. Anderson, J. C. and Narus, J. A., “A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnership”, Journal of Marketing, 54 (1), pp. 42-58, 1990.

6. Barki, H., “Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development”, MIS Quarterly, 25(2), pp. 195-228, 2001.

7. Beersma, B., “Cooperation, Competition, and Team Performance: Toward a Contingency Approach”, Academy of Management Journal, 46 (5), pp. 572-590, 2003.

8. Boulding and Kenneth E., Conflict and Defence: A General Theory, Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1962.

9. Bollen, K. A., Structural Equations with Latent Variables, John Wiley and Sons, 1989.

10. Carvell, M.R. and Kuzmits, F.E., Management of Human Resource, Personal, 1982.

11. Coleman, J. S., Foundation of social theory, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990.

12. Coser, L.A., The Functions of Social Conflict, Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1956.

13. Creed, W. E. D. and Miles, R. E., Trust in organization: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of control, Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp. 16-38, Thousand Oaks, 1996.

14. De Dreu, C. K. W., “Conflict Management and Performance”, In De Dreu C. K.W.

and VandeVliert E. eds., Using Conflict in Organization,London:SAGE, 1997.

15. Dessler, G., Human Resource Management, Prentice-Hall Inc, 1992.

16. Deutsch, M., “Trust and Suspicion”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), pp.265-279, 1958.

17. Deutsch, M., “Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes”. In Jones M. R., editor, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, pp. 275-319, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 1962.

18. Dargo, R and Garvey, “Incentives for helping on the job: theory and evidence”, Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), pp 1-25, 1998.

19. Dwyer, F. R., and Oh S., “Output sector munificence effects on the internal political economy of marketing channels”, Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), pp.

337-346, 1987.

20. Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., and Bourgeois, L. J., “Conflict and Strategic Choice: How top management teams disagree”, California Management Review, 39(2): 42-62, 1997.

21. Fiske and Taylor, Social Cognition, McGraw-Hill Inc, 1991.

22. Friedman, R. A., Tidd, S. T., Currall, S. C., and Tsal, J. C., “Stewing in your own juices: The effects of conflict style on work environment and stress”, International Association for Conflict Management Conference, 1998.

23. Gambetta, D., “Can we trust trust ? ” In Gambetta D. eds, Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, pp.213-237, Blackwell, 1988.

24. Ganesan, S.,”Determinants of long- term orientation in buyer-seller relationships”, Journal of Marketing, 58(2), pp.1-19, 1994.

25. Golembiewski, R. T., and McConkie, M., The Centrality of Interpersonal Trust In-Group Processes, Wiley, In: C. Cooper (ed), 1975.

26. Guetzkow, H. and Gyr, J., “An analysis of conflict in decision making groups”, Human Relations, 7(2), pp.367-381, 1954.

27. Hatcher, L., A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1994

28. Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, Wan, and Yiu, “Theory and research in strategic management:

Swings of a Pendulum”, Journal of Management, 25(3), pp. 417-456, 1999.

29. Hosmer, L. T., “Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics”, Academy of Management Review, 20(2), pp. 404-37, 1995.

30. Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., and Veenstra, C., “How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams”, Journal of Management, 25(2), pp.117-141, 1999.

31. Jehn, K., “The impact of intragroup conflict on effectiveness: A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of conflict”, Northwestern University Graduate School of Management, 1992.

32. Jehn, K., “Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and

disadvantages of valuebased intragroup conflict”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(4), pp. 223-238, 1994.

33. Jehn, K.A., “Qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (3), pp. 530-557, 1997.

34. Jehn, K. A. and Mannix, E., The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance, Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Pennsylvania, 1997.

35. Jehn, K. and Mannix, E, “The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), pp. 238-251, 2001.

36. Jehn, K., Northcraft, G., and Neale, M., “Why differences make a difference: A field of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), pp. 741-763, 1999.

37. Jehn, K.A., “A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of

intragroup conflict”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (2), pp. 256-282, 1995.

38. Kline, R. B., Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, New York:

Guiford Press, 1998.

39. Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., and Steenkamp, J. B., “The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), pp. 54-65, 1995.

40. Larzelere, R. E. and Huston, T. L., “The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42 (3), pp. 595-604, 1980.

41. Lawler, E.E. III., Pay and organizational development, Addison- Wesley, 1981.

42. Lewicki, R. J., and Bunker, B.B., “Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships”, In Roderick M. K. and Tyler eds., Trust in organization, Sage Publication Inc., 1996.

43. Mack, R. and Snyder, R., "An analysis of social conflict - Toward an overview and synthesis." Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1(2), pp. 212-248, 1957.

44. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D., “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.709-734, 1995.

45. McConaughy, D. L., and Mishra C. S., “Debt, performance-based incentives, and firm performance”, Financial Management, 25 (2), 1996.

46. Milkovich, G., and Newman, J., Compensation, Homewood, 1990.

47. O’Brien, R. C., Trust: Releasing energy to success, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2001.

48. O’Reilly, C.A., III, Williams, K.Y., and Barsade, W., “Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help? ”, Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 1, pp.183-207, Elsevier, 1998.

49. Panteli, N. and Sockalingam, S., ”Trust and Conflict within Virtual Inter- Organizational Alliances: A Framework for Facilitating Knowledge Sharing”, Decision Support Systems - Special Issue: Collaborative Work and Knowledge Management; 39(4), pp. 599-617, 2005.

50. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., and Xin, K. R., “Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), pp. 299-357, 1999.

51. Peterson, R. S., “Executive leadership: The case against impartiality”, Academy of Management national meetings, 1999b.

52. Pinkley, R.L. and Northcraft, G.B., “Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), pp.193-205, 1994.

53. Priem, R. L. and Price, K. H.,” Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making”, Group and Organization Studies, 16(2), pp.206-225, 1991.

54. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., and Zanna, M. P., “Trust in close relationships”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), pp.95-112, 1985.

55. Ring, P. S. and Van de Ven A. H., “Development processes of cooperative Interorganizational relationships”, Academy of Management Review, 19(1), pp.90-118, 1994.

56. Rose, G.M., and Shoham, A., “Interorganizational task and emotional conflict with international channels of distribution” ,Journal of Business Research,57(9), pp.942- 950, 2004.

57. Sharma, S., Applied Multivariate Techniques, John Wiley and Sons, 1996.

58. Schmitdt, S.M. and Kochan, T.A., “Conflict: Toward conceptual clarity”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 359-370, 1972.

59. Stephen P.R., Organizational Behavior: Concept. Controversies. Applications, 7th edition, Prentice Hall, 1996.

60. Thomas, K., Conflict and conflict management, Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Rand McNally, pp. 889-935, 1976.

61. Tjosvold, D., Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality, pp. 23-37, Thousand Oaks, 1997.

62. Vroom, V. H., Work and motivation, John Wiley and Sons, 1964.

63. Zand, D. E., "Trust and Managerial Problem Solving", Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), pp. 229-239, 1972.

附錄一

您好！這是一項有關「不同報酬型態對信任與衝突影響」的碩士論文研究問卷。

為了瞭解業界先進的看法，特地向您徵詢寶貴意見。本問卷純粹供學術研究之 用，您所提供的意見絕對保密，保證不單獨對外發表。請您詳實填答每個問題，

不要遺漏，並在填答完畢後將問卷交給貴單位受託的先生/小姐代為收回。衷弖 感謝您的支持與合作，並對於您的熱弖協助謹致上十二萬分的謝意！敬祝

時祺

交通大學經營管理研究所

論文指導教授 周瑛琪 博士 碩士班研究生 陳葳瑀 敬上 E-mail：jakkkky@hotmail.com

第一部份

 基本資料

1、您的性別： □(1) 男 □(2) 女 2、您的年齡：___________

3、您的婚姻狀況 □(1)已婚 □(2)未婚 4、您的職級：

□(1)基層員工 □(2)基層主管（如組長、課長）

□(3)中級主管（如經理、副理） □(4)高級主管（如部門主管以上）

□(5)其他職務(請明)______________________________________________

5、您的報酬(含薪資、獎金與福利)是基於下列哪種方式給付：

□(1)依個人績效給付

□(2)依所屬團隊的表現予以給付

□(3)同時包含(1)與(2)

□(4)其他(請具體描述)____________________________________________

6、公司名稱： _________________

7、公司所屬區域：________________

~~~本問卷到此結束，再次感謝您的填答~~~

全文完