• 沒有找到結果。

中國城鎮地區勞動薪資差異分解

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "中國城鎮地區勞動薪資差異分解"

Copied!
55
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)2013.

(2) 1978. 2008 Heckman. Oaxaca. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 60-70%. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v.

(3) ............................................................................................................1 ................................................................................................1 .....................................................................................5 ................................................................................................5 ....................................................................................................7 ......................................................................7 ..............................................8 ............................................................11. 政 治 大. ..................................................................................................14. 立. ..............................................................................................14. ‧ 國. 學. ..............................................................................................16 ............................................................18. ‧. .......................................................................21. y. sit. al. er. ..........................................................................25. n. Heckman. io. Oaxaca. Nat. ..................................................................................................25. Heckman. Ch. ............................................................28. ni U Oaxaca engchi. v. ...............28. ..............................................................................................29 ......................................................................................31 ..............................................................................................31 ....................................................................35 ............................................40 ......................................................................................46 .................................................................................................................48.

(4) 1.. ........................................ 3. 2.. ................................................... 4. 3.. ........................................................................................................... 16 ................................................................................ 18. 4. 2008 5.. ................................................................................................... 20. 6.. ............................................................................................ 23. 7.. – Probit Model............................................................... 32. 8.. .................................................................................... 34. 9.. .................................................................................... 37. 立. 10.. ......................................................................... 42. – Cotton. .............................................................................. 45. ‧. 13.. ‧ 國. 12.. ...................................... 41. Oaxaca-Heckman. 學. 11.. 政 治 大 ................................................................... 41. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 1.. .................................................................................................................... 6. 2.. ........................................................................................ 15.

(5) (Lewis, 1954). 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 1958 1958. 1978. 1978. 1980. 1990 1.

(6) 1978 1978. IMF. 34,942. 2,545. 學. (. 28.19%. 1). 1978. ‧ y. 1980. io. sit. GDP. al. 1990. n 60.10% 18.50%. 82,502. 治 政 6,094 大 立. Nat. 70.53%. GDP. 2010. Ch. engchi. 28.70%. er. GDP. 2012. ‧ 國. 2007. (IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, October 2012). i Un. v. 21.40%. 36.70%. 34.60%. 2001 37.66%. 51.27% 60%. 2012 2. 2011.

(7) 1.. 2010. 100.00%. 28.19%. 47.88%. 23.94%. 4545.6. 1371.6. 2192.0. 982.0. 100.00%. 30.17%. 9016.0. 28318. 363. 2513. 1784. 100.00%. 6945. 12.18%. 14.44%. 100.00%. 71.00%. 5532. 471. 2844. 1775. 48.22%. 立100.00% 21.60%. 2564.4. 3866.6. 2585.0. 100.00%. 28.44%. 42.89%. 18667.8. 5062.0. 7717.4. 100.00%. 27.12%. 41.34%. 60793.7. 12135.8. 100.00%. 治 17.30% 政 70.53% 大7707 42361 29122 68.75%. 18.19%. 13.06%. 16.56%. 100.00%. 62.41%. 49873. 31130. 10384. 8359. 824. 3724. 3093. 28.67%. 100.00%. 62.42%. 20.82%. 16.76%. 22.12%. 100.00%. 83.05%. 5888.4. 64749. 38914. 13856. 11979. 1301. 5570. 4916. 31.54%. 100.00%. 60.10%. 21.40%. 18.50%. 23.36%. 100.00%. 88.26%. 28679.5. 19978.5. 68065. 35530. 15655. 16880. 3416. 18320. 11836. 19.96%. 47.18%. 32.86%. 100.00%. 52.20%. 23.00%. 24.80%. 18.64%. 100.00%. 64.61%. 99214.6. 14944.7. 45555.9. 38714.0. 72085. 36043. 16219. 19823. 4146. 28088. 19529. 100.00%. 15.06%. 45.92%. 27.50%. 14.76%. 100.00%. 69.53%. 184937.4. 22420.0. 87598.1. 23439. 6704. 49307. 31963. 100.00%. 12.12%. 47.37%. a l 100.00% 50.00% 22.50%i v n C 74919.3 74647 17766 U h e n g33442 i c h 23.80% 40.51% 100.00% 44.80%. 31.40%. 13.60%. 100.00%. 64.83%. 401202.0. 40533.6. 187581.4. 173087.0. 76105. 27931. 21842. 26332. 14512. 85881. 65732. 100.00%. 10.10%. 46.75%. 43.14%. 100.00%. 36.70%. 28.70%. 34.60%. 16.90%. 100.00%. 76.54%. 39.02%. n. 2005. 4890. 2011. 3. y. sit. io. 2000. 40152. Nat. 1995. 872.5. ‧. 1990. 1745.2. 學. 1985. 1027.5. er. 1980. 3645.2. ‧ 國. 1978.

(8) 20% 1. 1978 363. 14.44%. 1990. 1,301 23.36%. 2010. 14,512. 16.90% 2. 1980. 9.32%. 48.29%. 立. 1978. ‧ 國. 38.9% 31%. 1985. 53.8%. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 2.. 2. ‧. 2010. 政 治 大. 學. 1985. 2010. Ch. %. engchi. i Un. v. %. 1978. 28318. 2320. 8.19. 343.4. 133.6. 38.9. 1980. 29122. 2714. 9.32. 477.6. 191.3. 40.1. 1985. 31130. 5935. 19.07. 739.1. 397.6. 53.8. 1990. 38914. 8794. 22.60. 1510.2. 686.3. 45.4. 1995. 35530. 13495. 37.98. 4283.0. 1577.7. 36.8. 2000. 36043. 12892. 35.77. 6280.0. 2253.4. 35.9. 2005. 33442. 12816. 38.32. 10493.0. 3254.9. 31.0. 2010. 27931. 13487. 48.29. 19109.4. 5919.0. 31.0. 2011. 4.

(9) 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 5. i Un. v.

(10) 1.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. -OLS. er. io. sit. y. Nat. -Probit. Ch. eHeckman ngchi Oaxaca. 6. i Un. v.

(11) Lewis (1954) Lewis. 政 治 大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. (Ranis & Fei, 1975). Ch. v. Lewis- Ranis. (Minami, 1967a, 1967b). n. al. Lewis. er. io. -Fei. sit. y. Nat. Ranis & Fei (1961). engchi. (Ranis & Fei, 1975). i Un. 1978 Lewis. 2003. Cai (2008a, 2008b, 2010). Cai & Du (2011) Wang (2010) 7.

(12) (Du & Pan, 2009; Meng & Bai, 2008) (Kwan, 2009; Minami & Ma 2009; Yao & Zhang, 2010) (Golley & Meng, 2011; Knight, Deng, & Li, 2011). 立. 政 治 大. n. al. er. io. sit. y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. Lewis. Ch. engchi. 8. i Un. v.

(13) Chan, Wing, & Chang (1999). Chan (2009). 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. Nat. n. al. 1958. 1955. er. io. 1950. sit. 1951. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 1958 1959 1960 (Wu 1994, Lin et el. 1996). 9.

(14) 立. 政 治 Chan (1996) 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 1978. 1980. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 1983. 1990. 70-80%. (Liang, 1999). 10.

(15) Chan (1994). Zhang (2004). 政 治 大. 立. 1983. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat Zhao (2005). Ch. Probit. Zhao (1999a). engchi. i Un. v. Logit. Hare (1999) Zhao (1999a) hao (1997, 1999a, 1999b, 2002). (1999) Zhu (2002). 11. Hare.

(16) Yang & Zhou (1999). (Zhao, 1999a). 治 政 Yao (2001) 大 立 ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n Meng & Zhang (2001). er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. i n CBrown Oaxaca U hengchi. v. 82% 18%. 50% Lee (2012). 2005. (China Urban Labor Survey, CULS). Oaxaca. (. ) CULS 12.

(17) Heckman 34% 22%. (44%). (34%). (. 立. ). 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. 1949. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 13. i Un. v.

(18) (Rural-Urban Migration in China and Indonesia. RUMiCI) RUMiC. University). (Australian National. (University of Queensland). RUMiCI. 2012. 2008. 立. ‧ 國. (International Data Service. 學. (Institute for the Study of Labor IZA) Center ISDC) 2009. 2012. 2013. 2014 2015 2008. y. Nat. RUMiC. n. al. er. io. RUMiC. ‧. 2010. Ch. engchi U. RUMiC. 14. RUMiCI. sit. 2008. 政 治 大 2011 11. v ni. 2.

(19) RUMiC. RUMiC. (NBS). 2.. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. RUMiCI, Research School of Economics, Australian National University. RUMiC. 5,007 15.

(20) 8,446. 5,002. 14,683. 23,129. RUMiC. RUMiC. 政 治 大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. Nat. 3. n. er. io. al. sit. 3. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 2008 16. 16. *. 12 12. 16.

(21) 16 16 2008. *. *. 立. *. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. *. 政 治 大. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. *. Ch. engchi. *. 17. i Un. v.

(22) 16 16. 60. 16. 55. 60. 7,425. 10,687 30 4. 500. 立. 政 治 大. 4. 2008. ‧ 國. ). 學. ( 960. ‧. 780 - 960 850. y. Nat. 770 - 1000. 550 -650. n. al. Ch. er. io. 600 - 700. sit. 500 - 560. i Un. 550 - 650. v. i e n g c520h- 680. RUMiC 5 61.7%. 31. 40 18. 81.7%.

(23) 16 55. 40 41. 21. 25. 74.9%. 61.6%. 83.8%. 31. 45. 40.6% 19.5%. 12.1 9.1. 40.7%. 35.7% (69.6%). 26.2%. 立. 5. 政 治 大4.1%. ‧ 國. 學. 24.6%. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 11.6%. Ch. engchi 50. 19. i Un. v. 78.

(24) 7.520. 14.535. 13.632. 21.306. 63.083. 58.297. 77.701. 44.233. 43.608. 48.852. 1599.921. 1422.524. 2143.415. 2314.727. 2287.100. 2518.811. 912.596. 886.706. 1235.316. 3198.567. 3215.367. 3070.799. 0.393. 0.395. 0.386. 0.436. 0.437. 0.432. 31.034. 29.732. 35.017. 40.030. 39.899. 41.021. 0.616. 0.534. 0.867. 0.846. 0.838. 0.907. 0.624. 0.504. 0.991. 0.604. 0.587. 0.737. 0.406. 0.409. 0.398. 0.195. 0.195. 0.197. 0.440. 0.444. 0.429. 0.557. 0.561. 0.527. 0.139. 0.136. 0.149. 0.229. 0.227. 0.247. 0.014. 0.011. 0.023. 0.018. 0.017. 0.029. 9.112. 9.369. 8.327. 12.124. 12.327. 10.580. 0.137. 0.113. 0.209. 0.042. 0.036. 0.087. 0.559. 0.547. 0.596. 0.193. 0.174. 0.344. 0.178. 0.192. 0.136. 0.256. y. =1). 6.533. 0.250. 0.305. 0.084. 0.100. 0.037. sit. (. 6.776. 0.101. 0.106. 0.065. 0.041. 0.018. er. 5.. 0.234. 0.248. 0.126. 0.186. 0.073. ). ). (16. ). (16. ). 0.035. al. n. (12. io. ). Nat. (12. 0.006. 0.004 C0.007 hengchi. iv 0.173 n U. ‧. (9. ). 學. (6. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大. 0.103. 0.094. 0.130. 0.114. 0.121. 0.060. 0.122. 0.131. 0.095. 0.109. 0.114. 0.067. 0.127. 0.133. 0.111. 0.111. 0.111. 0.111. 0.193. 0.233. 0.069. 0.163. 0.159. 0.199. 0.102. 0.078. 0.177. 0.111. 0.106. 0.149. 0.076. 0.082. 0.059. 0.077. 0.072. 0.113. 0.112. 0.084. 0.198. 0.114. 0.114. 0.115. 0.078. 0.073. 0.093. 0.121. 0.120. 0.131. 0.086. 0.092. 0.068. 0.079. 0.082. 0.057. 6636. 5001. 1635. 7108. 6282. 826. 20.

(25) RUMiC 5,001. 6,282 60. 1400. 45. 2300. 6. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 sit. (15.0%). (14.8%). n. al. (35.7%). Ch. engchi. er. io. (27.0%). y. Nat. (16.7%). (32.9%). i Un. v. 35.2% 44.8% 40%. 12.1%. 48%. 21.

(26) 40.2%. 28.9%. 56.3% 91.4%. Meng & Zhang (2001) 18% 64.6%. 立. (75.9%). 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 28.4%. (18.9%). Ch. n engchi U (15.6%). (20.6%) (5.8%). iv. (13.0%). (9.2%). (5.6%). 22. 25.0%. (4.0%).

(27) 5.854. 13.632. 15.183. 11.599. 58.297. 59.073. 57.109. 43.608. 44.110. 42.950. 1422.524. 1537.113. 1247.161. 2287.100. 2565.444. 1921.475. 0.385. 0. 1. 0.437. 0. 1. 29.732. 30.410. 28.696. 39.899. 41.399. 37.965. 0.534. 0.529. 0.541. 0.838. 0.843. 0.830. 0.409. 0.432. 0.374. 0.195. 0.206. 0.181. 0.444. 0.427. 0.470. 0.561. 0.556. 0.568. 0.136. 0.132. 0.142. 0.227. 0.221. 0.234. 0.011. 0.009. 0.015. 0.017. 0.017. 0.017. 9.018. 9.217. 8.754. 11.143. 11.440. 10.861. 0.113. 0.101. 0.132. 0.036. 0.038. 0.034. 0.547. 0.541. 0.554. 0.174. 0.177. 0.169. 0.192. 0.208. 0.168. 0.250. 0.253. 0.246. 0.100. 0.097. 0.103. 0.106. 0.100. 0.112. 0.041. 0.046. 0.034. 0.248. y. =1). 6.977. 0.234. 0.268. 0.007. 0.007. 0.008. 0.186. 0.197. 0.172. 5.556. 4.134. 14.657. 16.038. 12.875. n U i e h 0.024 n g c 0.018 0.329. 0.376. 0.269. 0.063. 0.058. 0.070. 0.046. 0.041. 0.053. 0.078. 0.070. 0.091. 0.150. 0.131. 0.173. 0.090. 0.101. 0.074. 0.148. 0.145. 0.151. 0.270. 0.256. 0.292. 0.099. 0.092. 0.107. 0.357. 0.370. 0.338. 0.167. 0.155. 0.182. 0.120. 0.121. 0.117. 0.063. 0.060. 0.065. 0.121. 0.124. 0.115. 0.352. 0.402. 0.289. 0.400. 0.418. 0.373. 0.448. 0.426. 0.476. 0.120. 0.115. 0.126. 0.066. 0.056. 0.079. (9. ). ). (16. ). (16. ). al. n. 4.994. 0.022. Ch. 23. ‧. (12. io. ). Nat. (12. ). 學. (6. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大. er. (. 6.533. sit. 6.. iv.

(28) 0.360. 0.343. 0.385. 0.138. 0.116. 0.156. 0.018. 0.020. 0.016. 0.072. 0.092. 0.046. 0.010. 0.006. 0.015. 0.238. 0.255. 0.217. 0.058. 0.042. 0.083. 0.253. 0.233. 0.278. 0.334. 0.221. 0.506. 0.270. 0.212. 0.345. 0.580. 0.712. 0.380. 0.167. 0.208. 0.114. 0.173. 0.192. 0.145. 0.646. 0.673. 0.612. 0.759. 0.745. 0.780. 0.307. 0.284. 0.337. 0.068. 0.063. 0.075. 0.047. 0.047. 0.051. 0.253. 0.245. 0.284. 0.314. 0.245. 0.130. 0.185. 0.046. 0.033. 0.042. 0.021. 0.033. 0.048. 0.011. 0.092. 0.118. 0.060. 0.007. 0.008. 0.005. 0.040. 0.044. 0.035. 0.156. 0.117. 0.216. 0.096. 0.076. 0.120. 0.189. 0.150. 0.248. 0.028. 0.023. 0.033. 0.044. 0.055. 0.026. 0.058. y. 0.051. 0.066. 0.035. 0.042. 0.023. 0.056. 0.051. 0.063. 0.094. 0.096. 0.097. 0.076. 0.124. 0.217. 0.206. 0.232. io. n. al. 0.062. C 0.048 h e n g c0.084 hi U. sit. Nat. 0.095. er. ‧ 國. 立. 學. 0.250. ‧. 政 治 大. v ni. 0.094. 0.096. 0.092. 0.121. 0.124. 0.118. 0.131. 0.120. 0.148. 0.114. 0.116. 0.112. 0.133. 0.135. 0.130. 0.111. 0.108. 0.115. 0.233. 0.235. 0.230. 0.159. 0.156. 0.163. 0.078. 0.088. 0.061. 0.106. 0.110. 0.101. 0.082. 0.076. 0.091. 0.072. 0.074. 0.069. 0.084. 0.093. 0.067. 0.114. 0.112. 0.117. 0.073. 0.071. 0.076. 0.120. 0.118. 0.123. 0.092. 0.084. 0.105. 0.082. 0.082. 0.083. 5001. 3024. 1977. 6282. 3539. 2743. 24.

(29) Oaxaca. Oaxaca (1973). Heckman. Oaxaca (1973) Oaxaca. Becker (1957) (discrimination. coefficient) (decomposition method). 政 治 大 立Oaxaca. n. al. -. (1). (. ). ). engchi. (i Un. v. ) =. Oaxaca. (2). Oaxaca. C -h. (. er. io =. =. sit. y. Nat. (1). ( ). ‧. ‧ 國. 學. ( ). Oaxaca. ). (. ). ln( + 1) = ln(. ln(. (. ). ). OLS (3). ln. =. + 25. = 1,. ,. ;. = ,.

(30) OLS (4) (5). ln. =. ln. =. ln ln. Oaxaca. ) =(. Nat. (8). =(. a) l. ). +. (6). n. (7). ln. io. (8). ln. (6). y. ln(. ln. ). sit. (7). ) =(. ‧. ln(. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大. ln. er. (6). =. C=h(. i ) +U n engchi. Oaxaca Oaxaca (1973). Oaxaca & Ransom (1994). 26. v.

(31) (9). ln. =(. ln. (10). ). +. +. +(. = Oaxaca (1973). ). (9) (7). (8) Reimers (1983) = (0.5). (11). N. (threefold). sit. al. ). Ch. er. ‧ 國 =(. n. ln. +. Jones & Kelly (1984). io. ln. Cotton =. Nat. (6) (13). s. ‧. (12). 政 治 大. 學. N. 立. =s. + 0.5. y. Cotton (1988). = 0.5. +. engchi U. v ni. +(. ). (13). (13). (14). ln. ln. =(. ). +. 27. (. ).

(32) Heckman Heckman (1979) OLS. (3). (15) (16). ln. (17). +. =. +. (latent variable). 政 治 大. 學. ‧ 國. 立. =. ‧. >0 =. sit. al. n. ln. (Inverse Mills Ratioo). >0 =. Ch. +. e=n g c h+i. i Un. v. =. =. Heckman. Oaxaca. Neuman & Oaxaca (2004) Oaxaca. er. io. (18). y. Nat. >0. Heckman Heckman. (9) 28.

(33) ln. (. (20). =. ). ln. (. +. ). +. +. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. (15). y. Probit. io. =. n. al. =. Ch. +. 1 0. >0. engchi. OLS. (b) ln. =. 政 治 大. Nat. (16). ln. +. 立. (a). +. sit. ln. ln. =. Heckit. 29. +. er. (19). i Un. v. (15) (16).

(34) (c). >0 =. ln. +. =. (a) (b) (c). +. (20). =(. ln. Cotton(1988). ln. ln. ). +. =. (d). Ch. (e). +. engchi. 30. +. +. =. al. n. (f). io. (. ). ‧. ln. ). +. y. 立. =. 政 =治 ( 大). sit. =0. ln. Nat. (f). =. +(. 學. (e). ln. =. =. ‧ 國. (d). (7) (8) (12). er. Heckman. Oaxaca. i Un. v. =.

(35) Probit. 24.6% 11.6%. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Probit. (. n. al. Ch. engchi U. 31. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 7. v ni. ).

(36) 7.. - Probit Model (. ). (. ). 0.0084***. -0.0016. 0.0067***. -0.0114*** -0.0063*** -0.0078***. (0.0028). (0.0021). (0.0023). (0.0016). (0.0015). (0.0022). -0.7027*** -0.1796*** -0.2367*** -0.6840*** -0.4777*** -0.2232*** (0.0324). -0.0835. -0.3674*** 0.4805***. (0.0272). (0.0373). 0.5632***. 0.5479***. (0.0456). (0.0721). 0.6193***. 0.1376. (0.0818). (0.1137) 0.0697. 0.4046***. -0.1763. 0.7170***. (0.1411). (0.1220). (0.1279). (0.0818). 0.2892**. 0.4035***. -0.2414*. 0.6913***. 0.6314***. (0.1395). (0.1212). (0.1270). (0.0764). (0.0772). (0.1081). 0.4268***. 0.4422***. -0.1995. 0.5167***. 0.4792***. 0.0802. (0.1472). (0.1261). (0.1322). (0.0781). (0.0788). (0.1104). 0.0830***. 0.0927***. -0.0608*** 0.1752***. 0.1748***. -0.0473***. (0.0096). (0.0073). al. (0.0078). (0.0046). (0.0061). io. y. er. Nat. (0.0048). ‧. ‧ 國. 0.3925***. 學. (0.0696). i v0.2563*** -0.2057*** n C h 0.2482*** 0.4858*** i U (0.0260) e(0.0270) n g c h(0.0289) (0.0263). n. (0.0353). 1. (0.0296). 治0.8047*** 政 大 (0.0534) (0.0587) (0.0481) 立. 0.0640*. Pseudo R. (0.0358). sit. (0.0429). 0.2779*** (0.0333). -0.1696*** -0.3443*** 0.2645***. 0.0156**. 0.0091. -0.0008. (0.0238). (0.0217). (0.0216). (0.0066). (0.0060). (0.0081). 0.4986***. 0.0954. -0.9537*** -2.1029*** -2.3378*** -1.1770***. (0.1892). (0.1568). (0.1669). (0.1093). (0.1086). (0.1516). 0.0945. 0.1149. 0.1191. 0.269. 0.2061. 0.0501. 7425. 7425. 7425. 10687. 10687. * ** ***. 10687. 10% 5% 1%. 2 3. 32.

(37) Probit. 8. OLS Mincer. 立. 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. Mincer. er. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. Ch. engchi. RUMiC. RUMiC 7. 8. 33. i 25% Un. v.

(38) 8. (. ). (. ). -0.1317*** -0.1170*** -0.1686*** -0.2254*** -0.1972*** -0.4370*** (0.0140). (0.0137). (0.0385). (0.0173). (0.0156). (0.0882). 0.0893***. 0.2456. (0.0225). (0.1532). 0.0512***. 0.0154 治0.1129*** 政 (0.0146) (0.0570) (0.0254) 大 立 0.0492*** 0.0303*** 0.0540***. 0.0352***. -0.0165. (0.0039). (0.0039). (0.0028). (0.0176). 0.0142. 0.0212. (0.0102). (0.0031). 學. ‧ 國. (0.0155). (0.0004). (0.0001). (0.0001). 0.2638***. 0.1949***. 0.3427***. 0.2729***. 0.2127***. 0.5505**. (0.0579). (0.0631). (0.1264). (0.0656). (0.0613). (0.2749). 0.2421***. 0.1583**. 0.3566***. 0.3449***. 0.2830***. 0.6269**. (0.0578). (0.0629). (0.1259). (0.0637). 0.0540***. 1. sit. (0.0596). i v0.2607*** 0.1332** n C h 0.2453* 0.2986*** i U (0.0607) e(0.1316) (0.0646) n g c h(0.0650). n. (0.0596). er. io. 0.1953***. Adj R. al. ‧. (0.0002). Nat. (0.0002). y. -0.0017*** -0.0016*** -0.0019*** -0.0005*** -0.0006*** 0.0009* (0.0005). (0.2641) 0.4122 (0.2715). 0.0556***. 0.0432***. 0.0906***. 0.0917***. 0.0826***. (0.0029). (0.0029). (0.0081). (0.0029). (0.0027). (0.0147). 0.8537***. 0.8977***. 0.8638***. 0.6720***. 0.6825***. 0.7888**. (0.0650). (0.0693). (0.1535). (0.0753). (0.0702). (0.3476). 0.1009. 0.1421. 0.0506. 0.1878. 0.2371. 0.0919. 6636. 5001. 1635. 7108. 6282. 826. * ** ***. 10% 5% 1%. 2. 34.

(39) Probit. Mincer. 9. OLS. Heckman (2). 立. (4). ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat (. Heckman. 治 政 Mills 大(Mills Invers Ratio). ). Ch. engchi. i Un. v. Heckman Meng & Zhang (2001) 1.07 35.

(40) 1.04. 立. 政 治 大. 6. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 1.23 1.06. 1.40. (1.25. 36. ). (1.12. ).

(41) 9.. OLS. Heckit. (1). (2). OLS. Heckit. (3). (4). 學 -0.1649***. (0.0131). (0.0167). (0.0134). 0.0060. -0.1625***. 0.0748***. (0.0131). (0.0224). (0.0191). 0.0414***. 0.0391***. 0.0250***. (0.0035). (0.0035). (0.0025). y. sit. io. al. ‧. -0.1473***. Nat. -0.0954***. er. ln W. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大. n. v -0.0011*** ni C h -0.0011*** U-0.0005*** e(0.0002) (0.0002) n g c h i (0.0001). -0.1209*** (0.0192) 0.0118 (0.0274) 0.0244*** (0.0025) -0.0005*** (0.0001). 0.0824. 0.2218***. 0.1611***. 0.0796. (0.0552). (0.0656). (0.0515). (0.0574). 0.0731. 0.2107***. 0.2007***. 0.1163**. (0.0551). (0.0653). (0.0500). (0.0564). 0.0602. 0.2124***. 0.1627***. 0.0967*. (0.0564). (0.0674). (0.0509). (0.0549). 0.0434***. 0.0663***. 0.0561***. 0.0379***. (0.0027). (0.0039). (0.0026). (0.0062). -0.0372. -0.0652. 0.0499**. 0.0497**. (0.0410). (0.0415). (0.0225). (0.0223). 37.

(42) 0.1349***. 0.1341***. 0.1219***. 0.1199***. (0.0275). (0.0288). (0.0337). (0.0335). -0.0155. -0.0214. 0.0762***. 0.0738***. (0.0233). (0.0241). (0.0233). (0.0232). 0.0094. 0.0064. 0.0881***. 0.0856***. (0.0216). (0.0225). (0.0246). (0.0245). -0.0305**. -0.0300**. -0.0168. -0.0202. (0.0148). (0.0151). (0.0253). (0.0251). -0.0320. -0.0340*. -0.0095. -0.0108. (0.0196). (0.0204). (0.0419). (0.0417). -0.0419*. -0.0377. 0.3756***. 0.3758***. (0.0243). (0.0251). (0.0294). (0.0292). 0.0508*** (0.0194). 立 -0.0929***. 0.2099*** 政0.0575***治 大 (0.0201) (0.0268). 0.2097*** (0.0265) -0.0497. (0.0197). (0.0204). (0.0318). (0.0315). 0.3814***. 0.3321***. 0.3559***. 0.3576***. (0.0440). (0.0456). (0.0302). (0.0302). 0.2723***. 0.2493***. 0.1981***. 0.2004***. (0.0617). (0.0668). (0.0222). (0.0221). 0.1280***. 0.1175***. 0.1120***. n. (0.0176). y. sit. io. -0.0022. er. Nat. al. (0.0267). ‧. ‧ 國. -0.0538*. 學. -0.0852***. iv n 0.0168 C h -0.0075 e(0.0182) n g c h i U(0.0240) (0.0283). (0.0220). 0.1125*** (0.0218) 0.0201 (0.0238). 0.0795***. 0.0714***. 0.0364**. 0.0372**. (0.0160). (0.0164). (0.0174). (0.0173). 0.0922***. 0.0911***. 0.2713***. 0.2752***. (0.0267). (0.0276). (0.0328). (0.0327). 0.0480*. 0.0478*. 0.1484***. 0.1452***. (0.0250). (0.0259). (0.0259). (0.0258). 0.1802***. 0.1817***. 0.2052***. 0.2029***. (0.0274). (0.0282). (0.0414). (0.0412). 0.1076***. 0.0979**. 0.1616***. 0.1567***. (0.0381). (0.0392). (0.0311). (0.0309). 38.

(43) 0.0673. 0.0356. 0.2732***. 0.2695***. (0.0726). (0.0784). (0.0391). (0.0390). 0.0508**. 0.0481*. 0.1326***. 0.1286***. (0.0245). (0.0255). (0.0294). (0.0292). -0.0630***. -0.0542**. 0.0929**. 0.0900**. (0.0232). (0.0243). (0.0434). (0.0429). 0.0770**. 0.0608*. 0.3596***. 0.3579***. (0.0347). (0.0363). (0.0338). (0.0337). 0.1042***. 0.1124***. 0.2321***. 0.2292***. (0.0366). (0.0390). (0.0340). (0.0339). -0.0377. -0.0359. 0.1803***. 0.1788***. (0.0310). (0.0316). (0.0263). (0.0261). 0.0086 (0.0256). 立 -0.0086. 0.2625*** (0.0267) 0.1567***. (0.0239). (0.0247). (0.0269). (0.0268). -0.0141. -0.0385*. 0.3969***. 0.3903***. (0.0218). (0.0227). (0.0252). (0.0252). -0.2890***. -0.2882***. -0.2172***. -0.2186***. (0.0276). (0.0287). (0.0274). (0.0273). -0.2695***. -0.2751***. -0.2122***. -0.2113***. (0.0272). (0.0283). (0.0305). (0.0304). y. sit. io. er. Nat. al. ‧. ‧ 國. 0.1610***. 學. -0.0345. iv n (0.0272) C (0.0288) (0.0272) h e-0.3531*** n g c h i U-0.2169*** -0.3558***. -0.2197***. (0.0285). (0.0297). (0.0265). (0.0264). -0.3247***. -0.3199***. -0.1972***. -0.1961***. (0.0264). (0.0273). (0.0294). (0.0293). 1.2359***. 0.7419***. 0.7214***. 1.1702***. (0.0679). (0.0901). (0.0714). (0.1558). n. -0.4575***. Mills 5001 1. 0.2651*** 政-0.0066 治 大 (0.0266) (0.0268). * ** ***. -0.4458***. -0.3220***. -0.3250*** (0.0272). 0.5696***. -0.2047***. (0.0901). (0.0629). 7425 10% 5% 1%. 2. 39. 6282. 10687.

(44) Oaxaca. Heckman. Oaxaca. 9. 立. 9. ‧ 國. 學. (d) (e) (f). ‧. Oaxaca. 11.91. sit 10.39. al. n. 5.68. io. OLS. y. Nat. Heckman. OLS. 4.71C h 4.39. e nHeckit gchi. Heckit OLS. 7. 40. er. 10. 10. 政 治 大. i Un. 7.52. v. OLS.

(45) 10. 11. 3.32. 44.14%. 2.46. 55.86%. 32.77%. 67.23% 2.94. 39.09%. 29.82%. 31.08%. 11. 56.01%. 立. Oaxaca - Heckman 4.7116. 11.9077. 10.3907. 7.1767. 3.2140. 11.9077. 7.5260. 5.6791. 1.8469. 6.8538. io. a l6.5123 2.6076 9.6658i v n Ch engchi U. n. 9.1199. 4.3907. y. 5.6791. er. 10.3907. Nat. -. Oaxaca. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 10.. 11.. 3.3179. 4.3907. 2.4631. 6.7271. 2.9387. Oaxaca-Heckman (. ). 44.14%. -. 55.86%. 32.77%. 67.23%. -. 39.09%. 29.82%. 31.08%. 49.58%. -. 50.42%. 36.97%. 63.03%. -. 43.99%. 27.96%. 28.05%. 41.87%. -. 58.13%. 23.78%. 76.22%. -. 33.84%. 33.81%. 32.35%. 41. 7.5169. 8.5898. sit. 66.16%. 政 治 大.

(46) 12. 政 治 大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. ). n. al 0.3900*** C (0.0212) h. -0.0050***. er. io. Total. (. – Cotton. sit. y. Nat. 12.. 0.2976***. e n g(0.0230) chi. i Un. v. 0.3101*** (0.0348). 0.0051. 0.0058. (0.0013). (0.0049). (0.0056). -0.0199***. 0.0647***. 0.0517***. (0.0056). (0.0132). (0.0105). 0.2795***. -0.0914***. -0.0408***. (0.0192). (0.0266). (0.0119). -0.1892***. 0.0790***. 0.0149***. (0.0207). (0.0230). (0.0044). 0.1539***. -0.1567***. -0.1483***. (0.0121). (0.0405). (0.0384). -0.0306***. -0.0123. -0.0323. (0.0093). (0.0075). (0.0198). 42.

(47) 0.0190***. -0.0236. -0.0233. (0.0053). (0.0216). (0.0213). 0.0131***. -0.0116. -0.0088. (0.0039). (0.0087). (0.0066). -0.0004. 0.0174**. 0.0014**. (0.0071). (0.0071). (0.0006). -0.0019***. -0.0003. -0.0005. (0.0006). (0.0009). (0.0015). 0.0024*. 0.0065***. 0.0041***. (0.0013). (0.0023). (0.0015). 0.0031***. 0.0054**. 0.0040**. (0.0011). (0.0023). (0.0017). 0.0041 (0.0026). 0.0015 (0.0044) 0.0015. (0.0023). (0.0006). (0.0031). 0.0470***. 0.0670***. 0.0278***. (0.0050). (0.0063). (0.0028). 0.0090***. 0.0313***. 0.0339***. (0.0017). (0.0069). (0.0074). 0.0168***. 0.0016. n. Ch. 0.0194***. (0.0017). e n g0.0008 chi U. y. sit. 0.0071. er. io. al. (0.0051). ‧. Nat. 0.0003. 學. ‧ 國. 立 0.0019. 治 政 0.0004 (0.0013) 大. v ni. (0.0075). 0.0003. (0.0020). (0.0018). (0.0006). 0.0529***. -0.0054. -0.0003. (0.0077). (0.0077). (0.0004). 0.0234***. -0.0006. -0.0002. (0.0036). (0.0042). (0.0012). -0.0007. 0.0030. 0.0051. (0.0014). (0.0032). (0.0056). 0.0260***. -0.0102. -0.0033. (0.0060). (0.0071). (0.0023). -0.0037***. 0.0040***. 0.0070***. (0.0010). (0.0010). (0.0017). 43.

(48) 0.0008. 0.0111***. 0.0136***. (0.0009). (0.0042). (0.0051). -0.0186***. 0.0003. 0.0015. (0.0027). (0.0007). (0.0036). 0.0083***. 0.0025. 0.0011. (0.0017). (0.0021). (0.0009). 0.0058***. 0.0043***. 0.0009**. (0.0015). (0.0016). (0.0004). -0.0054***. 0.0035**. 0.0070**. (0.0013). (0.0017). (0.0034). -0.0042. 0.0018***. 0.0152***. (0.0042). (0.0006). (0.0052). 0.0037*** (0.0010). 0.0071*** (0.0013) 0.0022**. (0.0009). (0.0013). (0.0010). 0.0136***. 0.0215***. (0.0033). (0.0041). (0.0015). 0.0043***. 0.0148***. 0.0140***. (0.0010). (0.0021). (0.0021). -0.0014**. 0.0095***. n. Ch. -0.0156*** (0.0020). (0.0018) 0.0297*** e n g(0.0025) chi U. y. sit. 0.0140***. er. io. al. (0.0006). 0.0075***. ‧. Nat. 0.0030**. 學. ‧ 國. 立 0.0042***. 治 政 0.0079*** (0.0014) 大. v ni. (0.0027). 0.0559*** (0.0046). -0.0072***. 0.0033*. 0.0030*. (0.0015). (0.0019). (0.0017). 0.0024*. 0.0020. 0.0029. (0.0012). (0.0013). (0.0019). -0.0100***. 0.0059***. 0.0057***. (0.0022). (0.0020). (0.0019). -0.0133***. 0.0072***. 0.0054***. (0.0018). (0.0021). (0.0016). 0.0022. 0.0046***. 0.0063***. (0.0014). (0.0015). (0.0021). 0.1900**. 0.2383**. (0.0798). (0.1001). 44.

(49) 13 (. ). 13.. 政 治 大 3.73%. 11.19%. 30.24%. 立 15.38%. 69.76% 100.00%. ‧ 國. 學. 1.06% 10.25%. ‧. 17.23% 58.83%. y. Nat. 41.17%. n. er. io. al. sit. 100.00%. 58.83%. Ch. engchi 41.17%. 45. i Un. v.

(50) RUMiC. 立. 政 治 大. OLS. ‧ 國. 學. Oaxaca. Heckman. ‧. 60%. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 40%. 46.

(51) 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 47. i Un. v.

(52) Cai, Fang and D. Wang (2003), “Migration As Marketization: What Can We Learn from China’s 2000 Census Data?”, The China Review, Vol. 3(2), pp. 73-93. Cai, Fang (2008a), Lewis Turning Point: A Coming New Stage of China’s Economic Development. Beijing, China: Social Sciences Academic Press. Cai, Fang (2008b), “Approaching a Triumphal Span: How Far is China towards Its Lewisian Turning Point?”, UNU-WIDER Research Paper, No. 2008/09. Cai, Fang (2010), “Demographic Transition, Demographic Dividend, and Lewis Turning Point in China”, China Economic Journal, Vol. 3(2), pp. 107-119. Cai, Fang and Y. Du (2011), “Wage Increases, Wage Convergence, and the Lewis Turning Point in China”, China Economic Review, Vol. 22, pp. 601-610.. 政 治 大. Chan, Kam Wing (1996), “Post-Mao China: A Two-Class Urban Society in Making”,. 立. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 20(1), pp. 134-150.. ‧ 國. 學. Chan, Kam Wing and L. Zhang (1999), “The Hukou System and Rural-Urban Migration in China: Processes and Changes”, China Quarterly, Vol. 160, pp. 818-855.. ‧. Chan, Kam Wing (2009), “The Chinese Hukou Syatem at 50”, Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 50(2), pp. 197-221.. Nat. sit. y. Chow, G. C. (1993), “Capital Formation and Economic Growth in China”, Quarterly. er. io. Journal of Economics, Vol. 108(3), pp. 809-842.. Cotton, J. (1988), “On the Decomposition of Wage Differentials”, Review of Economics. n. al. Ch. and Statistics, Vol. 70(2), pp. 236-243.. engchi. i Un. v. Du, Yang and W. Pan (2009), “Minimum Wage Regulation in China and Its Application to Migrant Workers in the Urban Labour Market”, China and World Economy, Vol. 17(2), pp. 79-93. Du, Yang and M. Wang (2010), “Discussion on Potential Bias and Implications of Lewisian Turning Point”, China Economic Journal, Vol. 3(2), pp. 121-136. Golley, J. and X. Meng (2011), “Has China Run Out of Surplus Labour?”, China Economic Review, Vol. 22, pp. 555-572. Guo, Jiqiang, L. Jiang, and L. Lu (2011), “Decomposition Methods for Wage Differentials: A Survey”, China Economic Quarterly, Vol. 10(2), pp. 363-414. Hare, Denise. (1999), “’Push’ versus ‘Pull’ Factors in Migration Outflows and Returns: Determinants of Migration Status and Spell Duration among China’s Rural Population”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 35(3), pp. 45-72. 48.

(53) Heckman, J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”, Econometrica, Vol. 47(1), pp. 153-161. Islam, N. and K. Yokota (2008), “Lewis Growth Model and China’s Industrialization”, Asian Economic Journal, Vol. 22(4), pp. 359-396. Jann, B. (2008), “A Stata Implementation of the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition”, ETH Zurich Sociology Working Paper, No.5 Jones, F. L., and J. Kelly (1984), “Decomposing Differences between Groups: A Cautionary Note on Measuring Discrimination”, Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 12(3), pp. 323-343. Knight, J., Q. Deng, and S. Li (2011), “The Puzzle of Migrant Labour Shortage and Rural Labour Surplus in China”, China Economic Review, Vol. 22, pp. 585-600.. 治 政 大 Economic and Business Experience from China during Reform”, Journal of Chinese 立 Studies, Vol. 7(3), pp. 341 361.. Kwan, Fung (2009), “Agricultural Labour and the Incidence of Surplus Labour:. ‧ 國. 學. Lee, Leng (2012), “Decomposing Wage Differentials between Migrant Workers and Urban Workers in Urban China’s Labor Markets”, China Economic Review, Vol. 23,. ‧. pp. 461-470.. y. Nat. Lewis, W. A. (1954), “Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour”, Manchester. sit. School of Economics and Social Studies, Vol. 22, pp. 139-191.. al. er. io. Liang, Zai, (1999), “Foreign Investment, Economic Growth, and Temporary Migration:. v. n. The Case of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, China,” Development and Society, Vol. 28(1), pp. 115–137.. Ch. engchi. i Un. Lin, Justin, Fang Cai, and Zhou Li (1996), The China Miracle: Development Strategy and Economic Reform, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press. Lu, Z. and S. Song (2006), “Rural-Urban Migration and Wage Determination: The Case of Tianjin, China”, China Economic Review, Vol. 17, pp. 337-345. Meng, Xin (2000), Labour Market Reform in China, Cambride University Press. Meng, Xin and Junsen Zhang (2001), “The Two-Tier Labor Market in Urban China: Occupational Segregation and Wage Differentials between Urban Residents and Rural Migrants in Shanghai”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 29(3), pp. 485 504. Meng, Xin and N. Bai (2008), “How much have wages of unskilled workers in China increased?”, in R. Garnaut, & Lijang Song (Eds.), China: Linking markets for growth, 49.

(54) pp. 151 175, Canberra: Asian Pacific Press. Minami, Ryoshin (1967a), “The Turning Point in the Japanese Economy”, Center Discussion Paper No. 20, the Economic Growth Center, Yale University. Minami, Ryoshin (1967b), “Population Migrtion Away from Agricultural in Japan”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 15(2), Part 1., pp. 183-201. Minami, Ryoshin and X. Ma (2010), “The Lewis Turning Point of Chinese Economy: Comparison with Japanese Experience”, China Economic Journal, Vol. 3(2), pp. 163-179. Neumark, D. (1988), “Employers’ Discriminatory Behavior and the Estimation of Wage Discrimination”, Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 23(3), pp. 279-295. Neuman, S. and R. Oaxaca (2004), “Wage Decomposition with Selectivity-corrected. 政 治 大. Wage Equation: A Methodological Note”, Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 2(1), pp. 3-10.. 立. Oaxaca, R. (1973), “Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets”,. ‧ 國. 學. International Economic Review, Vol. 41(3), pp. 693-709.. Oaxaca, R. and M. Ransom (1994), “On Discrimination and the Decomposition of. ‧. Wage Differentials”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 61, pp. 5-21.. y. Labor Market from 2002 to 2007”, Working Paper.. sit. Nat. Qu, Zhaopeng and Z. Zhao (2011), “Evolution of the Chinese Rural-Urban Migrant. al. er. io. Ranis, G. and J. C. H. Fei (1961), “A Theory of Economic Development”, American. iv n C Ranis, G. and J. C. H. Fei (1975), “A h Model of Growth and e n g c h i U Employment in the Open Dualistic Economy: The Case of Korea and Taiwan”, Journal of Development n. Economic Review, Vol. 51, pp. 533-565.. Studies, Vol. 11(2), pp. 32-63. Reimers, C. (1983), “Labor Market Discrimination against Hispanic and Black Men”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 65(4), pp. 570-579. Todaro, M. P. (1969), “A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries”, American Economic Review, Vol. 59(1), pp. 138–148. Wang, Meiyan (2010), “The Rise of Labor Cost and the Fall of Labor Input: Has China Reached Lewis Turning Point?”, China Economic Journal, Vol. 3(2), pp. 137-153. Wu, Harry Xiaoying (1994), “Rural to Urban Migration in the People’s Republic of China”, China Quarterly, Vol. 139, pp. 669-698. Yang, Dennis Tao and Hao Zhou (1999), “Rural-Urban Disparity and Sectoral Labour 50.

(55) Allocation in China”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 35(3, pp. 105-133. Yang, Du and M. Wang (2010), “Discussions on Potential Bias and Implications of Lewis Turning Point”, China Economic Journal, Vol. 3(2), pp. 121-136. Yao, Yang (2001), “Social Exclusion and Economic Discrimination:The Status of Migrants in China’s Coastal Rural Areas”, Working Paper. Yao, Yang and K. Zhang (2010), “Has China Passed the Lewis Turning Point? A Structural Estimation Based on Provincial Data”, China Economic Journal, Vol. 3 (2), pp. 155-162. Zhang, Xiaobo, J. Yang, and S. Wang (2011), “China Has Reached the Lewis Turning Poing”, China Economic Review Vol. 22, pp. 542-554. Zhao, Yaohui (1997), “Labor Migration and Returns to Rural Education in China”,. 治 政 大 The Case of Rural Zhao, Yaohui (1999a), “Labor Migration and Earning Differences: 立 China”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 47(4), pp. 767–782. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 79(4), pp. 1278–1287.. ‧ 國. 學. Zhao, Yaohui (1999b), “Leaving the Countryside: Rural-To-Urban Migration Decisions in China”, American Economic Review, Vol. 89(2), pp. 281–286.. ‧. Zhao, Yaohui (2002), “Causes and Consequences of Return Migration: Recent. y. Nat. Evidence from China”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 376–394.. sit. Zhao, Yaohui (2003), “The Role of Migrant Networks in Labor Migration: The Case of. er. io. China”, Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 21(4), pp. 500–511.. al. iv n C China: a Review”, The Developing U pp. 285–312. hEconomies, i 43(2), e n g c hVol. Zhu, Nong (2002), “The Impacts of Income Gaps on Migration Decision in China”, n. Zhao, Zhong (2005), “Migration, Labor Market Flexibility, and Wage Determination in. China Economic Review, Vol. 13, pp. 213–230.. 51.

(56)

參考文獻

相關文件

This plan aimed to understand the employment willingness and required skills to enter the labor market, and to get the employment opportunities of the youth people in Yunlin,

Community industry enhancement and local economic development are the most important goals of rural community empowerment; conversely, the collapse of communities and

Ma, T.C., “The Effect of Competition Law Enforcement on Economic Growth”, Journal of Competition Law and Economics 2010, 10. Manne, H., “Mergers and the Market for

“Water control and useful knowledge: river management and the evolution of knowledge in China, Northern Italy and the Netherlands.” Paper presented at the Global Economic

Microphone and 600 ohm line conduits shall be mechanically and electrically connected to receptacle boxes and electrically grounded to the audio system ground point.. Lines in

Understanding the China–US trade war: causes, economic impact, and the worst-case scenario... Remarks by President Trump and Vice Premier Liu He of the People’s Republic of China

Setting 1997 Q3 as the dividing point, we compare two cases of labor rent: “domestic and foreign labor market” and “domestic labor market”, before and after the minimum wage

Using regional variation in wages to measure the effects of the federal minimum wage, Industrial and Labor Relations Review,