Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Journal of Hazardous Materials 152 (2008) 120–127
Degradation of C.I. Reactive Red 2 (RR2) using ozone-based systems:
Comparisons of decolorization efficiency and power consumption
Chung-Hsin Wu
a
,
∗
, How-Yong Ng
b
aDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Da-Yeh University, 112, Shan-Jiau Road, Da-Tsuen, Chang-Hua, Taiwan, ROC bDivision of Environmental science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Received 14 April 2007; received in revised form 21 June 2007; accepted 21 June 2007 Available online 28 June 2007
Abstract
This study investigated the decolorization efficiency of C.I. Reactive Red 2 (RR2) in O
3, O
3/H
2O
2, O
3/Fe
3+, O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+, UV/O
3, UV/O
3/Fe
3+,
UV/O
3/H
2O
2and UV/O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+systems at various pHs. The effective energy consumption constants and the electrical energy per order of
pollutant removal (EE/O) were also determined. The experimental results indicated that the energy efficiency was highest at [H
2O
2]
0= 1000 mg/l
and [Fe
3+]
0
= 25 mg/l. Accordingly, the H
2O
2and Fe
3+doses in the hybrid ozone- and UV/ozone-based systems were controlled at these values.
This work suggests that the dominant reactant in O
3, O
3/Fe
3+and O
3/H
2O
2systems was O
3and that in the O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+system was H
2O
2/Fe
3+.
The experimental results revealed that the combinations of Fe
3+or H
2
O
2/Fe
3+with O
3at pH 4 and of H
2O
2or H
2O
2/Fe
3+with UV/O
3at pH 4
or 7 yielded a higher decolorization rate than O
3and UV/O
3, respectively. At pH 4, the EE/O results demonstrated that the UV/O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+system reduced 85% of the energy consumption compared with the UV/O
3system. Moreover, the O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+system reduced 62% of the energy
consumption compared with the O
3system. At pH 7, the EE/O results revealed that the UV/O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+system consumed half the energy of the
UV/O
3system.
© 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: C.I. Reactive Red 2; Ozone; Ferric; Hydrogen peroxide; Decolorization; Power consumption
1. Introduction
The textile industry utilizes numerous dyes and pigments.
Among these, azo dyes represent the largest and the most
impor-tant class of commercial dyes. Most commercial dyes are not
directly toxic. Colored wastewater is subject to strict
environ-mental legislation because they have a negative effect on the
photosynthetic activity in Taiwan. Accordingly, decolorization
of dye effluents has attracted increased attention. The C.I.
Reac-tive Red 2 (RR2), dye with the most commonly used anchor – the
dichlorotriazine group – was selected as the parent compound
in this study. Conventional treatment cannot efficiently remove
dyes from textile wastewater, because they are stable against
light and biological degradation. Treatments such as adsorption,
flotation and coagulation only perform the phase transfer of
pol-lutants but do not destroy them. Hence, further treatments are
∗Fax: +886 55334958.
E-mail address:[email protected](C.-H. Wu).
required. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are alternative
methods for decolorizing and reducing recalcitrant wastewater
loads from textile companies. AOPs are based on the
genera-tion of hydroxyl radicals in water, which are highly reactive
and nonselective oxidants that can oxidize organic compounds.
Hydroxyl radicals have an oxidation potential that exceeds that
of ozone and H
2O
2– 2.80 V for hydroxyl radicals, 2.07 V for
ozone and 1.78 V for H
2O
2. Ozone may either react directly with
organic compounds or decompose highly reactive species, such
as hydroxyl radicals. Ozonation has potential in decolorization
for the following reasons: (1) no sludge remains; (2) danger is
minimal; (3) decolorization and degradation occur in one step;
(4) it is easily performed; (5) little space is required, and (6)
all residual ozone can be easily decomposed to oxygen and
water
[1]
. Accordingly, the ozone-based systems are feasible
for decolorizing azo dyes.
Combining various AOPs commonly causes interesting
syn-ergistic effects that can markedly reduce the reaction time and
economic cost. Various studies have explored the synergistic
effects of the decolorization of dyes in ozone-based systems,
0304-3894/$ – see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.073
C.-H. Wu, H.-Y. Ng / Journal of Hazardous Materials 152 (2008) 120–127 121
such as O
3/H
2O
2[2–4]
, O
3/Fe
2+[5,6]
, UV/O
3/H
2O
2[2,4,7]
,
O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
2+[2]
, UV/O
3/Fe
2+[5,6,8]
, UV/O
3/Fe
3+[9]
,
UV/TiO
2/O
3[4,10]
, UV/O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+[4]
, UV/O
3/Fe
2+/Cu
2+[6,8]
, UV/O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
2+[2]
and UV/O
3/TiO
2/SnO
2[11]
. Since
Fe
3+in hybrid ozone-based systems has rarely been examined
and iron catalysts are abundant in nature, this study
incorpo-rates Fe
3+into the hybrid ozone-based systems to evaluate the
decolorization efficiency of RR2 at various pHs.
The photodegradation of aqueous organic pollutant is an
electric-energy-intensive process, and electric energy typically
represents a major fraction of the operating costs. Simple
figures-of-merit based on electric energy consumption can therefore be
very useful. The electrical energy per order of pollutant removal
(EE/O) is a powerful scale-up parameter and a measure of the
treatment rate in a fixed volume of contaminated water as a
function of the applied specific energy dose
[12]
. The EE/O
value was adopted to compare the energy efficiency of
differ-ent systems. In the case of low-pollutant concdiffer-entrations, the
EE/O (kW h m
−3order
−1) can be determined from the following
equations.
EE
/O =
Pt × 1000
V × 60 × log (A
i/A
o)
(1)
ln
A
iA
o= k
at
(2)
where P is the power (kW) of the AOPs; t is the reaction time
(min); V is the volume (l) of the water in the reactor; A
iand A
oare the inflow and outflow RR2 absorbance and k
ais the
pseudo-first-order rate constant (min
−1) for the decay of the pollutant
in the pollutant concentration
[12,13]
. Combining Eqs.
(1)
and
(2)
yields Eq.
(3)
for EE/O.
EE
/O =
38
.4 × P
Vk
a(3)
Most related studies compared efficiency using reaction rate
constants. Few works considered the effects of power
con-sumption
[12,13]
. Wu et al.
[14]
had plotted ln(A
i/A
o) against
total energy consumption and determined the effective energy
consumption constants (k
b, kJ
−1). Since the ozone reaction
path-ways depend strongly on the characteristics of the wastewater to
be treated, including pH, promoters and scavengers in the
solu-tion, this study simultaneously employs k
a, EE/O and effective
energy consumption constants, as proposed by Wu et al.
[14]
,
to evaluate the decolorization efficiency and power
consump-tion of ozone-based systems at different pHs. The objectives of
this investigation are (i) to calculate the k
a, k
band EE/O values
of ozone-based systems O
3, O
3/H
2O
2, O
3/Fe
3+, O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+,
UV/O
3, UV/O
3/Fe
3+, UV/O
3/H
2O
2and UV/O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+sys-tems at pH 4, 7 and 10; (ii) to clarify the effects of UV irradiation
in these ozone-based systems; (iii) to determine the synergistic
effects of different pHs and (iv) to compare the variations of k
a,
k
band EE/O with pH.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
The parent compound, RR2, obtained from Aldrich
Chem-ical Company, was employed without further purification. The
formula, molecular weight and maximum light absorption
wave-length (
λ
max) of RR2 were C
19H
10Cl
2N
6Na
2O
7S
2, 615 g/mol
126 C.-H. Wu, H.-Y. Ng / Journal of Hazardous Materials 152 (2008) 120–127
Table 2
Effective energy consumption constants (kb, kJ−1) and electrical energy per order (EE/O, kW h m−3order−1) of various ozone-based systems
pH 4 pH 7 pH 10
kb R2 EE/O kb R2 EE/O kb R2 EE/O
Non-UV systems O3 0.058 0.983 3.684 0.109 0.970 2.111 0.199 0.996 1.070 O3/Fe3+ 0.086 0.999 2.473 0.084 0.948 2.541 0.150 0.988 1.332 O3/H2O2 0.023 0.987 9.225 0.049 0.994 4.321 0.060 0.990 3.568 O3/H2O2/Fe3+ 0.154 0.956 1.384 0.073 0.990 3.030 0.075 0.986 2.968 With-UV systems UV/O3 0.036 0.974 6.420 0.051 0.975 4.223 0.118 0.994 1.865 UV/O3/Fe3+ 0.025 0.998 8.533 0.050 0.958 4.240 0.068 0.989 2.909 UV/O3/H2O2 0.105 0.935 2.256 0.093 0.972 2.306 0.064 0.977 3.141
UV/O3/H2O2/Fe3+ 0.234 0.968 0.979 0.108 0.968 2.133 0.072 0.984 2.972
UV/O
3and O
3systems were satisfactory for decolorizing RR2
at pH 10. Gutowska et al.
[36]
indicated that ozonation was more
effective for C.I. Reactive Orange 113 degradation than for
Fen-ton’s process. However, Jozwiak et al.
[37]
demonstrated that
Fenton’s process was more effective than ozonation for C.I. Acid
Brown 159. Additionally, the EE/O values were found to depend
Fig. 7. Relationship between decolorization ratio and total energy consump-tion for ozone- and UV/ozone-based systems (a) pH 4, (b) pH 7 and (c) pH 10 (RR2 = 40 mg/l, ozone flow rate = 500 ml/min, H2O2= 1000 mg/l, Fe3+= 25 mg/l and T = 25◦C).
on the concentration of oxidant, the concentration and the basic
structure of the dye
[13]
. Hence, this investigation suggests that
the optimal conditions (both for decolorization efficiency and
effective energy consumption) varied among the dyes, revealing
that the development of a general decolorization method for a
mixture of dyes would be very difficult.
4. Conclusion
The decolorization rate constants, effective energy
consump-tion constants and electrical energy per order of pollutant
removal in O
3, O
3/H
2O
2, O
3/Fe
3+, O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+, UV/O
3,
UV/O
3/Fe
3+, UV/O
3/H
2O
2and UV/O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+systems
were determined at pH 4, 7 and 10. The effect of Fe
3+dose
on dye decolorization was similar to that of H
2O
2; the
reac-tion rate constants initially increased to a critical value and
then declined. The k
avalues of O
3, O
3/Fe
3+, O
3/H
2O
2, UV/O
3and UV/O
3/Fe
3+systems were larger under alkaline than under
acidic conditions. However, O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+, UV/O
3/H
2O
2and
UV/O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+systems varied oppositely. The experimental
results indicated that the combination of Fe
3+or H
2O
2/Fe
3+into
O
3at pH 4 and H
2O
2or H
2O
2/Fe
3+with UV/O
3at pH 4 and
7 could yields a higher decolorization rate than O
3and UV/O
3,
respectively. The EE/O and k
bvalues followed the same order for
both ozone- and UV/ozone-based systems. Based on the
anal-yses of decolorization efficiency and power consumption, this
study suggests that the UV/O
3/H
2O
2/Fe
3+system was an
appro-priate method for decolorizing RR2 at pH 4 and 7. Moreover,
UV/O
3and O
3systems are acceptable for decolorizing RR2 at
pH 10.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the National Science Council
of the Republic of China for financially supporting this research
under Contract No. NSC 95-2221-E-212-022.
References
[1] E. Oguz, B. Keskinler, Z. Celik, Ozonation of aqueous Bomaplex Red CR-L dye in a semi-batch reactor, Dyes Pigments 64 (2005) 101–108.
C.-H. Wu, H.-Y. Ng / Journal of Hazardous Materials 152 (2008) 120–127 127
[2] J. Beltran-Heredia, J. Torregrosa, J.R. Dominguez, J.A. Peres, Comparison of the degradation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid in aqueous solution by several oxidation processes, Chemosphere 42 (2001) 351–359.
[3] T. Kurbus, A.M.L. Marechal, D.B. Voncina, Comparison of H2O2/UV, H2O2/O3and H2O2/Fe2+processes for the decolorisation of vinylsulphone reactive dyes, Dyes Pigments 58 (2003) 245–252.
[4] J.R. Dominguez, J. Beltran, O. Rodriguez, Vis and UV photocatalytic detoxification methods (using TiO2, TiO2/H2O2, TiO2/O3, TiO2/S2O82−, O3, H2O2, S2O82−, Fe3+/H2O2and Fe3+/H2O2/C2O42−) for dyes treat-ment, Catal. Today 101 (2005) 389–395.
[5] E. Brillas, J.C. Calpe, P.L. Cabot, Degradation of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by ozonation catalyzed with Fe2+and UVA light, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 46 (2003) 381–391.
[6] M. Skoumal, P.L. Cabot, F. Centellas, C. Arias, R.M. Rodriguez, J.A. Gar-rido, E. Brillas, Mineralization of paracetamol by ozonation catalyzed with Fe2+, Cu2+, and UVA light, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 66 (2006) 228–240. [7] S. Esplugas, J. Gimenez, S. Contreras, E. Pascual, M. Rodriguez,
Com-parison of different advanced oxidation processes for phenol degradation, Water Res. 36 (2002) 1034–1042.
[8] E. Brillas, P.L. Cabot, R.M. Rodriguez, C. Arias, J.A. Garrido, R. Oliver, Degradation of the herbicide 2,4-DP by catalyzed ozonation using the O3/Fe2+/UVA system, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 51 (2004) 117–127. [9] S. Contreras, M. Rodriguez, E. Chamarro, S. Esplugas, UV- and
UV/Fe(III)-enhanced ozonation in aqueous solution, J. Photochem. Photo-biol., A: Chem. 142 (2001) 79–83.
[10] C.H. Wu, C.L. Chang, C.Y. Kuo, Decolorization of Amaranth by advanced oxidation processes, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 86 (2005) 37–43. [11] C.H. Wu, C.L. Chang, Decolorization of Procion Red MX-5B by advanced
oxidation processes: comparative studies of the homogeneous and hetero-geneous systems, J. Hazard. Mater. 128 (2006) 265–272.
[12] J.R. Bolton, K.G. Bircger, W. Tumas, C.A. Tolman, Figure-of merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation technologies for both electric- and solar-derived systems, Pure Appl. Chem. 73 (2001) 627–637.
[13] N. Daneshvar, A. Aleboyeh, A.R. Khataee, The evaluation of electrical energy per order (EEO) for photooxidative decolorization of four tex-tile dye solutions by the kinetic model, Chemosphere 59 (2005) 761– 767.
[14] C.H. Wu, C.L. Chang, C.Y. Kuo, Decolorization of Procion Red MX-5B in electrocoagulation (EC), UV/TiO2and ozone related systems, Dyes Pigments 76 (2008) 187–194.
[15] M.Y. Ghaly, G. Hartel, R. Mayer, R. Haseneder, Photochemical oxidation of p-chlorophenol by UV/H2O2and photo-Fenton process. A comparative study, Waste Manage. 21 (2001) 41–47.
[16] H. Kusic, N. Koprivanac, L. Srsan, Azo dye degradation using Fenton type processes assisted by UV irradiation: a kinetic study, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A-Chem. 181 (2006) 195–202.
[17] H. Kusic, N. Koprivanac, A.L. Bozic, I. Selanec, Photo-assisted Fenton type processes for the degradation of phenol: a kinetic study, J. Hazard. Mater. 136 (2006) 632–644.
[18] M. Tokumura, A. Ohta, H.T. Znad, Y. Kawase, UV light assisted decol-orization of dark brown colored coffee effluent by photo-Fenton reaction, Water Res. 40 (2006) 3775–3784.
[19] M.M. Alnuaimi, M.A. Rauf, S.S. Ashraf, Comparative decoloration study of Neutral Red by different oxidative processes, Dyes Pigments 72 (2007) 367–371.
[20] N. Modirshahla, M.A. Behnajady, F. Ghanbary, Decolorization and min-eralization of C.I. Acid Yellow 23 by Fenton and photo-Fenton processes, Dyes Pigments 73 (2007) 305–310.
[21] M.P. Titus, V.G. Molina, M.A. Banos, J. Gimenez, S. Esplugas, Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: a general review, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 47 (2004) 219–256.
[22] G. Ruppert, R. Bauer, G. Heisler, UV-O3, UV-H2O2, UV-TiO2and photo-Fenton – comparison of advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment, Chemosphere 28 (1994) 1447–1454.
[23] W.Z. Tang, P. Huang, Stoichiometry of Fenton’s reagent in the oxidation of chlorinated aliphatic organic pollutants, Environ. Technol. 18 (1997) 13–23.
[24] W.H. Glaze, J.W. Kang, D.H. Chapin, The chemistry of water treatment processes involving ozone, hydrogen, and ultraviolet radiation, Ozone Sci. Eng. 9 (1987) 335–352.
[25] I.A. Alaton, I.A. Balcioglu, D.W. Bahnemann, Advanced oxidation of a reactive dyebath effluent: comparison of O3, H2O2/UV-C and TiO2/UV-A processes, Water Res. 36 (2002) 1143–1154.
[26] M. Pera-Titus, V. Garcia-Molina, M.A. Banos, J. Gimenez, S. Esplugas, Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: a general review, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 47 (2004) 219–256.
[27] S. Lucas, J.A. Peres, Decolorization of the azo dye Reactive Black 5 by Fenton and photo-Fenton oxidation, Dyes Pigments 71 (2006) 236–244. [28] F.J. Beltran, F.J. Rivas, R. Montero-de-Espinosa, Iron type catalysts for the
ozonation of oxalic acid in water, Water Res. 39 (2005) 3553–3564. [29] I. Arslan, Treatability of a simulated disperse dye-bath by ferrous iron
coagulation, ozonation, and ferrous iron-catalyzed ozonation, J. Hazard. Mater. 85 (2001) 229–241.
[30] R.M.C. Silverstein, G.C. Basdler, G.C. Morrill, Spectrophotometric Iden-tification of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1991.
[31] G.R. Peyton, W.H. Glaze, The mechanism of photolytic ozonation, Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 189 (1985) 5.
[32] G. Tezcanli-Guyer, N.H. Ince, Individual and combined effects of ultra-sound ozone and UV irradiation: a case study with textile dyes, Ultrasonics 42 (2004) 603–609.
[33] V. Kavitha, K. Palanivelu, The role of ferrous ion in Fenton and photo-Fenton processes for the degradation of phenol, Chemosphere 55 (2004) 1235–1243.
[34] C. Canton, S. Esplugas, J. Casado, Mineralization of phenol in aqueous solution by ozonation using iron or copper salts and light, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 43 (2003) 139–149.
[35] M. Muruganandham, M. Swaminathan, Advanced oxidative decolourisa-tion of Reactive Yellow 14 azo dye by UV/TiO2, UV/H2O2, UV/H2O2/Fe2+ processes – a comparative study, Sep. Purif. Technol. 48 (2006) 297–303. [36] A. Gutowska, J. Kaluzna-Czaplinska, W.K. Jozwiak, Degradation mech-anism of Reactive Orange 113 dye by H2O2/Fe2+and ozone in aqueous solution, Dyes Pigments 74 (2007) 41–46.
[37] W.K. Jozwiak, M. Mitros, J. Kaluzna-Czaplinska, R. Tosik, Oxidative decomposition of Acid Brown 159 dye in aqueous solution by H2O2/Fe2+ and ozone with GC/MS analysis, Dyes Pigments 74 (2007) 9–16.