• 沒有找到結果。

不同運動型態對中老年女性平衡能力與功能性體適能的影響

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "不同運動型態對中老年女性平衡能力與功能性體適能的影響"

Copied!
60
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

(2) 2012. 6. 54—83 47 33. 141. 31. 30 ( ) (. ± 2.3. 38.0 ± 2.6. 37.3 ± 3.0 35.2 ± 4.6. 37.9 p < .05). (p < .05). i.

(3) The effect of balance and functional fitness in middle-aged and elderly females engaged in different exercise June 2012. Student Adviser. Wan-Hsin Chang Shen-Yu Hsieh. Abstract Purpose. To compare the balance and functional fitness within brisk. walking, swimming, yoga, and non-exercise, for both middle-aged and elderly females. Methods A total of 141 females aged between 54-83 years old were recruited for the subjects, including 47 in brisk walking group, 31 in swimming group, 33 in yoga group, and 30 in non-exercise group. All the subjects received the Fullerton Advanced Balance Tests and the functional fitness tests which include chair standing test, arm curling test, 2-min stepping test, chair sit-and-reach test, back scratching test, 8-ft up-and-go test, and 6-min walking test. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Results The balance scale of the exercise group was significantly better than the non-exercise group (brisk walking. 37.3 ± 3.0 grades, swimming. 37.9 ±. 2.3 grades, yoga 38.0 ± 2.6 grades, non-exercise 35.2 ± 4.6 grades, p < .05). There was no difference in balance scale among 3 exercise groups. The arm curling test, chair sit-and-reach test, and 6-min walking test of the swimming group and the chair sit-and-reach test and back scratching test of the yoga group were outstandingly higher than the non-exercise group (p < .05). Conclusions. The middle-aged and elderly females with regular exercise had. better balance ability than non-exercise females. Swimming could enhance upper-muscle strength, lower-limbs flexibility, and cardiopulmonary function. Yoga could increase upper and lower-limbs flexibility.. Key words. fall, senior citizen, Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale ii.

(4) iii.

(5) ………………………………………………………………………i ………………………………………………………………...……ii …………………………………………………………………………. iii ………………………………………………………………….1 ………………………………………………………...…1 ………………………………………………………...…2 …………………………………………………...………3 ………………………………………………………...…3 …………………………………………………...………3 ………………………………………………………...…4 ………………………………………………...…4 ………………………………………………...……6 ………………………………………………...…….7 …………………………...…7 ……………...…………8 ………………………………………………...………..10 ………………………………………………...………………12 …………………………………………...…………..12 iv.

(6) ………………………………….………………14 ……………………………………….…………15 …………………………………………….……15 ……………………………………….……29 ………………………………………………………………...30 ………………………….…………………30 …………………….……………31 …………………….………33 ………………………………………………………….……..35 ………………………………….…35 …………………………….36 ……………….............37 ………………………………………………………….……41. …………………………………………………………….………42 ………………………………………………………………………….45 …………………………………………...45 ……………………………………………...46 ………………………………………...47 ………………………………………………...48 v.

(7) ………………………………...50 …………………………………………………………………….51. vi.

(8) 1. ………………….………………………………30. 2. ……….…………32. 3. ……….……34. vii.

(9) 1. ……………………………………………………………….17. 2. ……………………………………………………………….18. 3. ………………………………...……………………………..18. 4. …………………………………...…………………………..19. 5. …………………………………………...……………………..20. 6. ……………………………………...…………………..20. 7. …………………………………………...……………..21. 8. …………………………………………………...…………..22. 9. ………………………………………………………...……..22. 10. …………………………………………………………...…23. 11. …………………………………………………………...…24. 12. ………………………………………………………...……25. 13. …………………………………………………...…26. 14. ………………………………………………………...……26. 15. …………………………………………………………...…27. 16. …………………………………………………… ……..28. 17. ………………………………………………………...…28. viii.

(10) 1. 98 245. 7,648. 65. 10.63 % (. 2010). 65 88. 18.7 %. 94. 20.5 % 94. 60. 69 12.6%. 92.73% 80. 65-69 99.94%. 30.1%. 85. 18.9%. 1:1. 1.5-2 2005. 20.8%. 2010). (.

(11) 2. (American College of Sports Medicine, ACSM) 65 (ACSM, 2009). (2009). Oken. (2006).

(12) 3. (. 1995. 1999). 54—83. 54—83.

(13) 4. 54—83. (World Health Organization, WHO) 54-83. 65.

(14) 5. 10 30. 150. (static balance). (dynamic. balance) (Fullerton Advanced Balance scale, FAB scale). (stand. with feet together, eyes closed) object). (reaching forward to retrieve an. (turning in a full circle to right and left). and over a 6”bench). (tandem walk). leg, eyes open). (step up (standing on one. (standing on foam, eyes closed). (two-footed jump for distance). (walk with head turns). (unexpected backward release) (Fullerton Advanced Balance scale, FAB scale) Rose (2003). Fall Proof: A. comprehensive balance and mobility training program (FAB scale). 10. 5.

(15) 6. (0-4. ). Rikli and Jones (1999b) ( ).

(16) 7. (Burtom & Miller, 1998). (static balance). (dynamic balance) (1987) (vestibular apparatus). (utricle). (saccule). (semicircular canals). (Lipsitz & Goldberger, 1992) Richter (1980). (excitability).

(17) 8. (Lee & Aronson, 1974). (Haywood, 1993). (. 1987) (Anderson & Behm, 2005). Gersten (1991). 65-75 (Gersten, 1991) (. 2004).

(18) 9. (. 1995. 1999) (. 143. 2002). 65. 14. 16 % (Melzer, Benjuya, & Kaplanski, 2003) (Carmeli, Kessel, Coleman, & Ayalon, 2002). (. 2000). (. 2002).

(19) 10. 30 (. 1991). 3. 12. (. 2009). 33. 2. 12. 14. 65 (Fear of falling,. FoF)(Schmid, Van Puymbroeck, & Koceja, 2010). Oken. (2006). (Gehlsen, 1990).

(20) 11.

(21) 12. 54-83. 141. 47 33. 30. 54—83. 31.

(22) 13. (. ). 10 30. 150. ( ). 10 30. 150. ( ). 10 30. 150. ( ) 100.

(23) 14. ( ). (. 1. 2.. ) ). (.

(24) 15. 2011. 4. 1. 2011. 12. 31. (Fullerton Advanced Balance scale, FAB scale) Rose (2003). Fall Proof: A. comprehensive balance and mobility training program (FAB scale) (0-4. 10. ). 5 (. (. ). ) (stand with. feet together, eyes closed). (reaching forward to retrieve an.

(25) 16. object). (turning in a full circle to right and left). and over a 6” bench). (step up. (tandem walk). leg, eyes open) (two-footed jump for distance). (standing on one. (standing on foam, eyes closed) (walk with head turns). (unexpected backward release). (stand with feet together, eyes closed) (reaching forward to retrieve an object) (turning in a full circle to right and left) (step up and over a 6” bench). 6. (tandem walk) (standing on one leg, eyes open) 2 (standing on foam, eyes closed). (Airex. pad). (two-footed jump for distance) ( (walk with head turns) (unexpected backward release). ). 100.

(26) 17. ( ). (stand with feet together, eyes closed) 1. 2. 3.. 30. 1 ( ). (reaching forward to retrieve an object) 1. 2. 3.. 25.

(27) 18. 2 ( ). (turning in a full circle to right and left) 1. 2.. 3.. 3 ( ). (step up and over a 6” bench) 1.. 6.

(28) 19. 2. 3.. 4.. 4 ( ). (tandem walk) 1. 2. 3.. 10.

(29) 20. 5 ( ). (standing on one leg, eyes open) 1. 2. 3. 4.. 20. 6.

(30) 21. ( ). (standing on foam, eyes closed) 1. 2. 3.. 20. 4.. 7 ( ). (two-footed jump for distance) 1.. 2. 3..

(31) 22. 8 ( ). (walk with head turns) 1.. 100. 2.. 30. 3.. 9.

(32) 23. ( ). (unexpected backward release) 1.. 2.. 3.. 10. Rikli and Jones (1999b).

(33) 24. ( chair stand ) (. 5. ). (arm curl) (2-min step) ( chair sit-and-reach) ( back scratch ) (8-ft up-and-go) ( (6-min walk). ( ). ( chair stand ) 1. 2.. 1/2. 3.. 1-2 30. 11. ).

(34) 25. ( ). (arm curl) 1. 2.. 1/2. 3.. 4.. 5. 1-2. 30. 12 ( ). (2-min step) 1.. (anterior superior iliac spine). (patella) 2. 3.. 2.

(35) 26. 13 ( ). ( chair sit-and-reach) 1. 2.. 1/2. 3.. 4.. 14. 90.

(36) 27. ( ). ( back scratch ) 1.. 2.. 15 ( ). (8-ft up-and-go) 1.. 2.. 3.. 8.

(37) 28. 16 ( ). (6-min walk) 1. 2.. 6. 3.. 17.

(38) 29. SPSS for Windows 12.0. = 0.05. Tukey.

(39) 30. (n=47) (n=31). (n=33). (n=30) (F=2.016. > .05). (F=0.438. p > .05). p > .05). (F=0.641. (F=1.465 p > .05). 1 1 Tukey ( ) (cm) (kg). (n=47). (n=31). (n=33). (n=30). 68.0 ± 5.3. 66.3 ± 6.5. 67.5 ± 6.0. 70.0 ± 6.8. n.s.. 154.1± 0.05. 154.0 ± 0.04. 152.9 ± 0.05. 151.9 ± 0.05. n.s.. 57.2 ± 9.8. 57.5 ± 8.5. 55.3 ± 6.2. 57.4 ± 9.6. n.s.. 24.0 ± 3.8. 24.2 ± 3.3. 23.7 ± 2.5. 24.8 ± 3.8. n.s.. 2. (kg/m ) ±. n.s. (non-significant) =. p < .05. p.

(40) 31. (F=1.240 > .05). (F=0.361. (F=1.240. p > .05). p > .05). (F=1.740. (F=2.540 p > .05) p < .05). (F=2.359. p > .05). p > .05). (F=5.189 p < .05) (F=1.285 p > .05). (F=5.064. p < .05). p. (F=3.584. (F=2.308 p > .05) Y= 0.824 - 0.020X. 100% (Hernandez & Rose, 2008). Y/(1+Y) *. (F=4.886. p < .05). Tukey 2 (3.8 ± 0.5 .05). (4.0 ± 0.0. ). (4.0 ± 0.0. ). ). (p < (3.9 ± 0.2. ) (3.4 ± 1.1 (3.8 ± 0.4. ). (3.9 ± 0.3. ). (p < .05). ). (35.2 ± 4.6. ). (p < .05).

(41) 32. (37.3 ± 3.0. ). (37.9 ± 2.3. Y= 0.824 - 0.020X. ). (38.0 ± 2.6. Y/(1+Y) * 100%. (10.2 ± 6.8 %) ± 4.9 %). ). (6.0 ± 3.9 %). (p < .05). (7.0. (5.9 ± 4.2 %). 2 F (n=47). (n=31). (n=33). (n=30). ( ). 4.0 ± 0.0. 4.0 ± 0.0. 4.0 ± 0.0. 3.9 ± 0.2. 1.240. n.s.. ( ). 3.9 ± 0.3. 3.9 ± 0.4. 4.0 ± 0.0. 3.9 ± 0.4. 0.361. n.s.. ( ). 3.6 ± 0.7. 3.7 ± 0.8. 3.6 ± 0.8. 3.2 ± 1.0. 2.359. n.s.. ( ). 4.0 ± 0.0. 4.0 ± 0.0. 4.0 ± 0.0. 3.9 ± 0.4. 1.240. n.s.. 3.7 ± 0.7. 3.7 ± 0.6. 3.9 ± 0.3. 3.6 ± 0.7. 1.740. n.s.. ( ). 3.5 ± 0.8. 3.8 ± 0.7. 3.8 ± 0.7. 3.3 ± 1.1. 2.540. n.s.. ( ). 4.0 ± 0.0. 4.0 ± 0.0. 3.9 ± 0.2. 3.8 ± 0.5. 5.189. 4<1&2&3. ( ). 3.8 ± 0.4. 3.8 ± 0.5. 3.9 ± 0.3. 3.4 ± 1.1. 3.584. 4<1&3. ( ). 2.9 ± 1.1. 3.0 ± 1.2. 3.1 ± 1.0. 2.6 ± 1.0. 1.285. n.s.. ( ). 3.8 ± 0.6. 3.9 ± 0.2. 3.8 ± 0.9. 3.5 ± 1.1. 2.308. n.s.. 37.3 ± 3.0. 37.9 ± 2.3. 38.0 ± 2.6. 35.2 ± 4.6. 5.064. 4<1&2&3. 7.0 ± 4.9. 6.0 ± 3.9. 5.9 ± 4.2. 10.2 ± 6.8. 4.886. 4>1&2&3. ( ). ( ) (%) 1 2. Tukey. 1= ±. 2=. 3=. n.s. (non-significant) =. 4= p < .05.

(42) 33. (F=1.268. p > .05). (F=3.129. (F=1.648. p > .05). (F=14.344. < .05). (F=3.885. p < .05) p < .05). (F=5.124. p < .05). (F=2.971. p. p < .05). Tukey 4-3. (14.5 ± 2.9. 8.7. /30. ). /30. (19.7 ± 8.3. ). ). ). (5.4 ± 7.9. ). ) ). (-4.7 ±. ) (7.0 ± 2.3. 1.3. (9.5 ± (5.4 ± 7.9. (4.9 ± 7.8 10.8. ). ). (12.2 ± 11.2. (12.2 ± 11.2. (17.6 ± 4.6. ). (5.9 ± 1.0. ). ). (5.9 ± 1.2. (6.1 ± ).

(43) 34. (470.2 ± 70.4 (414.5 ± 70.4. ). ). 3 F (n=47) ( /30 ( /30. ( /2 (. (n=31). (n=33). (n=30). 13.8 ± 3.1. 14.4 ± 3.5. 13.8 ± 3.5. 12.7 ± 3.6. 1.268. n.s.. 16.2 ± 3.8. 17.6 ± 4.6. 16.0 ± 4.1. 14.5 ± 2.9. 3.129. 2>4. 94.1 ± 21.3. 94.7 ± 22.0. 92.4 ± 19.3. 84.4 ± 20.8. 1.648. n.s.. 9.5 ± 8.7. 12.2 ± 11.2. 19.7 ± 8.3. 5.4 ± 7.9. ) ). ) 14.34. ). 3>1&2&4 2>4. 0.8 ± 10.6 (. Tukey. 0.7 ± 8.9. 4.9 ± 7.8. -4.7 ± 10.8. 5.124. 3>4. ) 6.1 ± 1.3. 5.9 ± 1.0. 5.9 ± 1.2. 7.0 ± 2.3. 3.885. 4>1&2&3. 454.1 ± 87.6. 470.2 ± 70.4. 463.2 ± 80.1. 414.5 ± 70.4. 2.971. 2>4. ( ) (. ) 1 2. 1= ±. 2=. 3=. n.s. (non-significant) =. 4= p < .05.

(44) 35. 54-83 (ACSM). 10. 30. 150. 100 90 ACSM. (p > .05).

(45) 36. (FAB scale) (35.2 ± 4.6 (37.3 ± 3.0 ± 2.6. ). ) (37.9 ± 2.3. ). (38.0. ) Y= 0.824 - 0.020X. Y/(1+Y) * 100%. (10.2 ± 6.8 %) (6.0 ± 3.9 %). (7.0 ± 4.9 %) (5.9 ± 4.2 %). Gehlsen(1990). (Lee & Aronson, 1974 Behm, 2005). Lipsitz & Goldberger, 1992. Anderson &.

(46) 37. (3.8 ± .4 (3.9 ± .3. ). (3.4 ± 1.1. ). ). 1999 2004. Rikli and Jones (1999b). (17.6 ± 4.6. /30. ) (12.2 ± 11.2. (14.5 ± 2.9 ) (470.2 ± 70.4. (414.5 ± 70.4. ). /30. ). (5.4 ± 7.9 ). ).

(47) 38. 65-75 (. 2000. Gersten, 1991). 800 (. 1995). (19.7 ± 8.3 (9.5 ± 8.7. ). (12.2 ± 11.2. ). (4.9 ± 7.8 10.8. (5.4 ± 7.9 ). ). (-4.7 ±. ). (7.0 ± 2.3 1.3. ). ). (5.9 ± 1.0. ). (5.9 ± 1.2. ) ). (6.1 ±.

(48) 39. (agility). (. (p > .05) Carmeli, Kessel, Coleman. Rikli and Jones (1999b). 2000). Ayalon( 2002).

(49) 40. ( ). ) (. ( 67.5. ). (. 68.0 70.0. ) ). (. 66.3.

(50) 41.

(51) 42. 1991. 67. 2000. 17-20. --. http://www.epsport.idv.tw/epsport/fitness/show.asp?repno=58&page=1 2009 ( ) http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22097FY0055630 05%22.&searchmode=basic 2010 http://www.ris.gov.tw/version96/stpeqr_01_04.html 2005 94 -. 88. http://www.doh.gov.tw/ufile/doc/960329-%E5%81%A5%E5%BA%B7%E5%B1%80 -%E8%80%81%E4%BA%BA%E8%B7%8C%E5%80%92.doc 1987 — 2000) 10 1-42 2004 30(1) 33-40 2002 1991 1999 1992 1995 26. 2-10 2002 1999 13(1). 31-38. 1995 2009 8(2) 1990 ) 2004. -. 182-188 13. 80. 45-50.

(52) 43. 2004. American College of Sports Medicine. (2009). ACSM position stand: Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(7), 1510-1530. Anderson, K., & Behm, D.G. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting balance and stability. Sports Medicine, 35(1), 43-53. Berger, B.G. & Owen, D.R. (1988). Stress reduction and mood enhancement in four exercise modes: Swimming, body conditioning, hatha yoga, fencing. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59(22), 148-159. Burton, A. W., & Miller, D. E. (1998). Movement skill assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Carmeli, E., Kessel, S., Coleman, R., & Ayalon, M. (2002). Effects of a treadmill walking program on muscle strength and balance in elderly people with down syndrome. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 57, 106-110. Gehlsen, G. M., & Whaley, M. H. (1990). Falls in the elderly: Part II, balance, strength, and the flexibility. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 739-741. Gersten, J. W. (1991). Effect of exercise on muscle function decline with aging. In Rehabilitation Medicine-Adding Life to Years [Special Issue]. The Western Journal of Medicine, 154(5), 579-582. Haywood, K.M. (1993). Laboratory activities for life span motor development. (2ed ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Hernandez, D. & Rose, D. J. (2008). Predicting which older adults will or will not fall using the Fullerton Advanced Balance scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(12), 2309-2315. Lee, D. N., & Aronson, E. (1974). Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 15(3), 529-532. Lipsitz, L. A., & Goldberger, A. L. (1992). Loss of “complexity” and aging: Potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. Journal of The American Medical Association, 267,1806-1809. Martin-Matthews, A. (1996). Widowhood and widowerhood. Encyclopedia of Gerontology, 2, 621-625. Melzer, I., Benjuya, N., & Kaplanski, J. (2003). Effects of regular walking on postural stability in the elderly. Gerontology, 49, 240-245. Oken, B. S., Zajdel, D., Kishiyama, S., Flegal, K., Dehen, C., Haas, M., …Leyva, J. (2006)..

(53) 44. Randomized, controlled, six-month trial of yoga in healthy seniors: effects on cognition and quality of life. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 12(1), 40-47. Richter, E. (1980). Quantitative study of human Scarpa’s ganglion and vestibular sensory epithelia. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 90(3-4), 199-208. Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (1999a). Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 7, 129-161. Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (1999b). Senior fitness test manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Riley, M. W. & Riley, J. W. (1986). Longevity and social structure: The potential of the added years. In Pifer, A. & Bronte, L. (Eds.). Our aging society: Paradox and promise. New York: W. W. Norton. Rose, D. (2003). Fall proof: A comprehensive balance and mobility training program. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Schmid, A. A., Van Puymbroeck, M., & Koceja, D.M. (2010). Effect of a 12-week yoga intervention on fear of falling and balance in older adults: A pilot study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 576-583. Sheikh, J. I. & Yesavage, J. A. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontology : A Guide to Assessment and Intervention, 5, 165-173..

(54) 45. 0973-575-758. 50. 85. ( (. ). ).

(55) 46. (. C.C.). (. (. ). ).

(56) 47. (PAR-Q).

(57) 48. (Fullerton Advanced Balance scale, FAB scale) :___________________________. :_______________. 1. ( ( ( ( (. )0 )1 )2 )3 )4. ( ( ( ( (. )0 )1 )2 )3 )4. ( ( ( (. )0 )1 )2 )3. 10 10. 30. 30 30. 2.. 3.. 4 4. (. )4. ( (. )0 )1. (. )2. (. )3. (. )4. ( ( ( ( (. )0 )1 )2 )3 )4. 4. 4.. 5. 10 10 10 10. 5 5 2 10.

(58) 49. 6. ( ( ( ( (. )0 )1 )2 )3 )4. ( ( (. )0 )1 )2. (. )3. 5 5 12. 12 20 20. 7.. 10 10 20. (. )4. (. )0. ( ( ( (. )1 )2 )3 )4. ( ( (. )0 )1 )2. (. )3. 20. 8.. 9. 30. 10 30. 30 30 30. ( 10. (. )4 )0. (. )1. (. )2. ( (. )3 )4. 30. 10.

(59) 50. ( /30 ( /30. ( /2 (. (68.0 yr). (66.3 yr). (67.5 yr). (70.0 yr). (65-69 yr). (70-74 yr). 13.8. 14.4. 13.8. 12.7. 11-16. 10-15. 16.2. 17.6. 16.0. 14.5. 12-18. 12-17. 94.1. 94.7. 92.4. 84.4. 73-107. 68-101. 9.5. 12.2. 19.7. 5.4. -1.27. -2.54. - +11.43. - +10.16. -8.89. -10.16. - +3.81. - +2.54. 6.4-4.8. 7.1-4.9. ) ). ) ) 0.8. (. 0.7. 4.9. -4.7. ) 6.1. 5.9. 5.9. 7.0. 454.1. 470.2. 463.2. 414.5. ( ) (. ) 1 2. Senior Fitness Test Manual. 457.2-580.6 438.9-562.4.

(60) 51. (Chang, Wan-Hsin). 1986.10.22. 2009.09 ~ 2012.06 2005.09 ~ 2009.06 2002.09 ~ 2005.06. 2010. 2010. 2011. (. ) 101.2.20. (. ) 99.12.8. 2010. ( C. (. ) 99.11.13 ) 98.12.11.

(61)

參考文獻

相關文件

(4) If a live-in foreign worker tests positive after a rapid COVID-19 test or a PCR test and is isolated or hospitalized and on leaving hospital subject to home quarantine, home

5.體能活動與體適能 (Physical activity and fitness) 6.心理健康與心理失調 (Mental health and

3.2 Rolle’s Theorem and the Mean Value Theorem 3.3 Increasing and Decreasing Functions and the First Derivative Test.. 3.4 Concavity and the Second Derivative Test 3.5 Limits

which can be used (i) to test specific assumptions about the distribution of speed and accuracy in a population of test takers and (ii) to iteratively build a structural

By correcting for the speed of individual test takers, it is possible to reveal systematic differences between the items in a test, which were modeled by item discrimination and

衞生署指出,由童年開始至成年階段,恆常參與體能活動

衞生署指出,由童年開始至成年階段,恆常參與體能活動對健康

均衡性 知識 技能 態度. 趣味性 探索 好玩有趣