!"#$%&'()*+,-./01
!"#$
1,2
2,* FU-LI CHEN1,2, LEE-LAN YEN2,*
1 !"#$%!&
Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
2 !"#$%&'()*+,-. /01234546
Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University. No.1,Jen-Ai Road,1st Section, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
* ! Correspondence Author. E-mail:lan@ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw
!"#$%&'()*+,&'-.)*+,)*+-.&',.&'/.)* !"#$%&'()*+,-./ !"#$%&'()*+,-+./012 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01234567849:;<=>"?@A !"#$%&'()*+&,-. !"#$%&'()*+,-./012 !"#$%&'()*+,-./-012-32-45-6789:;<=>?@AB !"#$%&'()*+,-./(01*234567894:;<=>?@%& !"#$%&'()*+,-%./012345 !"#$%&'()*+ !"#$%&'()*+ &,-.&/0123 456'7895:;<=>?@A !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?<+@AB CD !"#$%&'()*+ ,-./01234/0156789:;<)=>?@ !"#$%&'()*+$,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ !"ABC !"#$%&'()*+,-./( !199918(5)341-348)
!"#$%&'(&)*+&,-./
Factors related to adults' smoking and betel-nut chewing
combination behavior in Taiwan
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the patterns of the behavioral
combi-nation of smoking and betel-nut chewing and related factors. Four patterns of this behavioral combination were identified (i.e., both smoking and betel-nut chewing, smoking without betel-nut chewing, betel-nut chewing without smoking, and neither smoking nor betel-nut chewing).
Meth-ods: Data were obtained from a nationwide survey focusing on betel-nut chewing. Variables
in-cluding adults' socio-demographic variables, knowledge of damage about smoking and betel-nut chewing, smoking and betel-nut chewing behavior were used for analysis. Result: Education, ethnic group, occupation, gender, age, and knowledge of damage about smoking and betel-nut chewing were found significantly related to the behavior of "both smoking and betel-nut chew-ing". Region, ethnic group and gender were found significantly related to the behavior of "betel-nut chewing without smoking". In addition, gender and education were found significantly related to the behavior of "smoking without betel-nut chewing ". Conclusions: These results showed that the males, people who had only a primary school education, aborigines, and technical workers were more likely to smoke and chew betel nuts. A high prevalence of betel-nut chewing was found among males, people who lived in mountain areas, and aborigines. In addition, males and the subjects who graduated from junior high schools were more likely to smoke only. It was suggested that information about the adverse effects of smoking and betel-nut chewing should be taught to high risk groups and the abstaining skills should be taught. (Chin J Public Health.
(Taipei): 1999; 18(5): 341-348)
!"87122 !"88722 !"#$%&'()*+,-. !"#$%&'()*+,-.[1] !"#$%&'()*+#$,"- !"96%88%!"#$%&'()*+#$,"- !"#$%& !"70% !"#$%&'() [2] !"#$%&#'()*+, !"#$%&'()*+,- !"28 !"#$%&'()* 18 !"#$%&'(%)*+, 89 !"#$%&'()*+,-. !"#$% &'()*+,#- !"#$%!&'()*+ ,-& !"#$[3] !"#$[4] !"#$%&$%'()*+,-. !"#$%&'()86 !"# [5] !"#$%&'()*+,-. !" #$% &'() *'+ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"# $%&'()*(+#,- !"#$%&'()*+,-*. ![6] !"#$%&[7] !"#$ !"#$%&'18 !"#$% !"#29.6% 29.7% !"#$ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+#$,-) !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-. !"#$%&$'()*+,-. !"#$%&'()*+,-(. !"#$%&'()*+,"-./ [8] !"#$%&'()*+,-./ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%[9] !"#$%& !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&[10,11] !"#$ !"#$%&'()*+,-./ [7] !"#55.11% !"#3.28% !"#$%&(4.88%) !"# (5.21%) !"#$(4.92%) !"# !"#$%&'()*+,-#./ !"#$%&'()*+,-. !Sheridan !"[12] !" !"#$%&(18-39) !"# Graham [13] Hunt [14] ! !"#$%&'()#*+,-./ !"#$%&'(")*+,&-. [6] !"#$%&'%!()*+ !"!#$%&' !"#$%&'()*+,-& !"5.4% !"#$%&[15] !"#$%6.2%[16] !"#$ !"#$%&'([17] !"# !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,- ./ !"#$%[17] !"#$%& !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'( )*+,-./ !"#$%&'()*+,-./, !"#$%&'()*)+,,-. !"#[18] !"#$%&'( !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-./ [19] !"#$%&'()*+, [20] !"#$%&'())* !"#$%&'([21] !"# !"#$%&'()*+,-./ !"#$%&[22] !"#$% !"#$%&'()*+,-." !"#$%&'()**+,-./ !"#$%&'$%&"# !"#$%& '&"#$() !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0
!" !"# !"#$ !"#$ !"#$ !" ! !"# !"#$%&'()*+,-%./012345 !" !"#$%&'()*+,-+ !"#$%&'()*+[16] !18 !"#$%&'$()* !"#$%&'() *+"#, !"#$%&'()*+,#-./ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !( !" #$ %&) !"#$%&'!()*+&,1605
SAS for Windows !"#$% !"#$%&'Polytomous ! [23] !Polytomous !"#$ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$(dummy variable) !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()!*+,'-.)/ "1" !"#$%&'()*+, !"#$%&'() *+$!,-$ "0" Polytomous !"#$%&' !"#$%&'()*+"#$%, !"#$%& !'()"*+,- !"#$%&'()&*+,-./0 ! !"#$%&'()*+,-. !"#$%&'()*+,-.&/0 !"#$%&'()#$%!" & !"#$%&'()*+() !"#$!%&'()*+,(1108 69.03%) !"#$%&'() (270 16.82%) !"#$%&173 10.78% !"#$%&'()* (54 3.36%) !"#$%&'()*+,-. !"#$%&'(")*+,-. !"#$%& (16.7%) !"#$% !"#$%&'%()(20.8% 21.8%) !"#$%&'()*+,-.
(27.5%) !"#$%&'() !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 ( 21.6%30.8%) !"# !"#$%(91.6%) !"#$% !"#$%&'()*+(3.8%) (2.9%) !"#$%&'()*+,- !"#$%&'()*+(21.1%) !"#$%&'()*+( !"# 23.9%) (20.7%) !"#$%&'()*+,- !"#$%&'()!"#$%&'()*+,- !(!"#$%&'()*+,- 4.2%3.7%) !"#$%&'()*+ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;,<=>?@AB !"# !"#$ !"#$ !"#$ (n=173) (n=270) (n=54) (n=1108) % % % % 1. 39 6.3 130 20.8 3 0.5 451 72.4 78 16.7 59 12.7 10 2.1 319 68.5 23 7.7 47 15.8 6 2.0 221 74.4 15 13.6 24 21.8 5 4.6 66 60.0 18 16.5 10 9.2 30 27.5 51 46.8 2. 167 21.6 238 30.8 22 2.9 345 46.7 6 0.7 32 3.8 32 3.8 763 91.6 3. !"() ! 47 5.9 93 11.7 33 4.2 621 78.2 !" 103 21.1 117 23.9 18 3.7 250 51.2 !"#$%&' 15 7.4 42 20.7 1 0.5 145 71.4 () !" 5 5.3 14 14.9 0 0.0 75 79.8 4. !"# 66 9.7 102 14.9 41 6.0 474 69.4 56 20.2 61 22.0 9 3.3 151 54.5 () 44 11.8 67 17.9 3 0.8 260 69.5 !"# 5 2.0 38 14.9 0 0.0 212 83.1 5. !" 131 10.8 199 16.5 18 1.5 861 71.2 !" 16 12.9 23 18.6 2 1.6 83 66.9 7 4.6 40 25.9 0 0.0 107 69.5 ! 18 17.0 8 7.6 33 31.1 47 44.3 6. 19 7.3 52 20.1 2 0.8 186 71.8 !"#$% 106 12.8 140 16.9 21 2.5 563 67.8 29 8.8 63 19.1 1 0.3 237 71.8 !"#$! 14 10.3 10 7.4 20 14.7 92 67.7 * 5 10.2 5 10.2 10 20.4 29 59.2 * !"#$%"&'()*+
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olytomous !"#$ !"# $%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()* !"#$+,& !"#$%&'() *+,-./ !() !"#(1) !" !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 !" #$ %& '( )*+, !"#$%&'()* +,- !"#$%&'(11.13+,- !" !"#$%&'()*16.60 !"#$%&'()*+"0.25 0.14 !"#$%&'()*+, !" #$%&1.78 !"# !"74.44 !"#$%&'() !"#$%&'()* +,-./ !"#$%&'()*+"#,-. !"#$%&'(2) !"#$% !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-./ !"#$%2.27 !"#$%& !"#$3.39 !" #$%& !"#$%&1.68 !"#!$ 16.61(3) !"#$%&'()*+, !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !0.11 !"#$%"&'( !"#$%0.020.03 !"# !"2.66 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123/456789:;<-=>7? !" !"#(0-8) !"#$%(0-11) 1 !"# 173 3.8 2.2 173 6.6 2.3 2 !"#$ 270 4.3 2.2 266 6.2 2.5 3 !"#$ 54 2.6 2.0 52 5.5 2.6 4 !"#$ 1108 4.2 2.4 1098 6.0 2.6 F 9.603*** 3.658* ! 1>32>34>3 1>31>4 *P<0.05**P<0.01***P<0.001
!"#$%&'()!"#*+%&'()!%&'*+"#(,+-./01234 Polytomous Logistic !
!"#$%&'($ ! !"#$%!&'( !"#$%"&'( ! !
-3.38 -3.95 - 1.74 1. 1.00 1.00 1.00 -0.84 0.43 0.36 1.43 - 2.14* 0.11 0.00 1.00 -0.21 0.81 - 1.05 0.35 -0.75 0.47 -0.03 0.97 - 0.82 0.44 0.10 1.11 0.67 1.95 - 0.95 0.39 2. ! !"# 1.00 1.00 1.00 !"# 2.41*** 11.13 0.82** 2.27 2.00 7.39 2.81*** 16.60 1.22*** 3.39 2.01 7.46 !" 1.58*** 4.85 0.52* 1.68 0.46 1.58 3. ! 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.37* 0.25 -0.02 0.98 - 3.63*** 0.02 -1.02 0.36 0.22 1.24 - 3.39*** 0.03 -1.94** 0.14 0.25 1.28 -12.22 0.00 4. !"#$%&' 1.00 1.00 1.00 !" 0.58* 1.78 0.30 1.35 0.49 1.63 !"#$%&' 0.16 1.17 0.07 1.07 - 0.73 0.48 () !" 0.67 1.95 -0.06 0.94 - 6.27 0.00 5. 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.31*** 74.44 2.81*** 16.61 0.98** 2.66 6. ! 1.00 1.00 1.00 !"#$% 0.14 1.15 0.12 1.12 1.32 3.74 0.21 1.23 0.19 1.21 - 0.44 0.64 !"#$! -0.73 0.48 -0.69 0.50 - 0.32 0.73 -0.39 0.67 -0.43 0.65 0.03 1.03 7. -0.05*** -0.01 - 0.01 8. !"#$% 0.12* 0.02 0.05 9. !"# -0.21*** -0.00 - 0.12 Likelihood Ratio=1797.54 *p<0.05 **p<0.01***p<0.001
!"#$%&'()*+#$%,- !"#!"#$%&'()*+#$%,- $%&'!()*+,-. !"#$%&'()Polytomous !"#$%&(1) !"#$%& !"#$%&'(odds ratio=74.44) !"#$%&'()*+( o d d s r a -tio=16.61) !"#$%&'()*+(odds ratio= 2.66)(2) ( !"#$$% ) !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 (odds ratio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olytomous !"#$ !"#$%&'()*+,-./# !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()#$%*+,"- !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 !"#$%&'()*+,#-. ! !"#$%&'()*+, !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 !"#$%&'()*!&'($%" !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-./% !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 !"#$%&'()*+,-./01 !"#$%&''()*+$,- !"#$%&'()*+,-./ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 !"#$% !"#$%&'()*+,(1) !"#$%&'()*+,-.)/ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0 (2) !"#$%&'()*'+, !"#$%&'()*+,-. !"#$%(3) !"#$%&' !"#$%&'()*+,-.!/ ! 1. !"#$%&'()*+,-./ !"#$%19971641-3 2. Ko YC, Huang YL, Lee CH, Chen MJ, Lin
LM, Tsai CC. Betal quid chewing, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption related to oral cancer in Taiwan. Journal of Oral
Pathology Medicine 1995;24:450-3.
3.
!"#$%&'()*+,-199526734-7
4. U.S. Public Health Services. Smoking and Health. Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Services. U.S. Department of Health, Ed-ucation, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, 1964.
5. !"#$%&'()*!"+,- !"#$%&'1997
6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Ser-vices. The Health Consequences of Invol-untary Smoking: A Report of Surgeon Gen-eral. Washington, Dc: US Government Printing Office,1986.
7. !"#$%&'(!")*+ !"#$%&'()*+,-. 1996
8. Howe H. An historical review of women, smoking and advertising. Health Education 1984;15:3-9.
9. Waldron I. Patterns and causes of gender dif-ferences in smoking. Social Science and Medicine 1991;32:989-1005.
10. Elkind AK. The social definition of wom-en's smoking behavior. Social Science and Medicine 1985;20:1269-78.
11. !"#$%&'()*+!,(- !"#$%&'()*+ 1996
4115-25
12. Sheridan DP, Hornung CA, McCutcheon EP. Demographic and educational differenc-es in smoking in a tobacco-growing state. American Journal Preventive Medicine
1993;9:155-9.
13. Graham H. Cigarette Smoking: A light on gender and class inequality in Britain? Jour-nal of Social Policy 1995;24:509-27. 14. Graham H, Hunt S. Women's smoking and
measures of women's socio-economic sta-tus in the United Kingdom. Health Promo-tion InternaPromo-tional 1994;9:81-8. 15. !" #$%&'()*+,- !"#$%&'()*+,-./ !"#$%&'1994 16. !"# $%&'()*+,-. !"#$%&'()*+,-. !"#$%&'1996 17. !"#!$%&'()*+,-. !"#$%&'()*+,-./ 1997 2119-77 18. !"#$%&'(!)*+,- !"#$%&'()*199382 19. !"#$%&&'()*+, 199526718-28 20. !"#$%&'()*)+,-. !"#$%&'(&')"*)" !"#$%1996 21. !"#$%&'()*+,-. !"#$!%&'()*+',- !"#$!%&'()*+',- 1996!"#$!%&'()*+',- 22. !"#$!%&'!()*+,- !"#$%&'()*+,-./ !"#$%&'()*)+, 199410405-11
23. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley- Interscience, 1989;216-38.
