• 沒有找到結果。

預算控制制度對組織衰退影響之實證研究The Effects of Budgetary Control Systems on Organizations Experiencing Decline---An Empirical Study in Taiwan

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "預算控制制度對組織衰退影響之實證研究The Effects of Budgetary Control Systems on Organizations Experiencing Decline---An Empirical Study in Taiwan"

Copied!
33
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

(2)  NSC88-2416-H-110027 . 

(3). 

(4)  !"#$%&'()* +,-./0123456789:;<-=>?@A BCDEFGH-8%IJKLMN-OPQ%1?RS TU-VWXStaw et al.,1981Y6Z*[\]^_`%/a bBCcdIefg%hijke?lmnopqrstu6 vwxyz{|}~~JKd€‚}~.oƒPQ„ %†?(‡ 'ˆ‰Š‹ŒbŽ%{|}~~G‘o’v“ ”•yŒ€6–—%R˜™*@A{|}~~.) š%h›œ<{|}~~žŸ ¡6 ˆ‰¢¢{|}~6. Abstract As managerial and research interest in organizational decline have steadily increased, a range of divergent conceptualizations and research findings have emerged con concerning the decline phenomenon. Among them, the 'threat rigidity theory' (Staw et al.,1981) has been identified as the widely accepted theory with regard to the response from the declining organizations. In addition, as organizational decline has become a pervasive situation, it's obvious that we are facing uneasy time requiring orgnaizations to have at least the same performance with less resouces. Accounting literature suggests that budget control is among the most used tools in enhancing control and efficiency. The bulk of organization literature, however, argues that the dysfunctional effects of budgetary control systems would be exemplified during the condition of organizational decline. The purpose of the study is to investigate the relationaship between budgetary control systems and organisational decline, and to examine the contingency argument of the dysfunctional effects of budgetary control systems of organizations experiencing decline, taking into consideration the environmental change. Keywords: Orgnaizational Behavior, Organizational Decline, Budgetary Control.. 1.

(5)   . £¤P¥h€%¦§¨mM©ª«¬­®¯.°±¬­9:²³ ¡ ´%µ¶¨mL·¸¹žŸº»¼½¾9:6Z*¬­:¿ÀÁÂÃ%Ä ?ő ¼Æ FÇ È% =‘v ɗ Ê ˾ ÌÍ Î†? ÏÐ ‘   XOrganizational declineY.э›œÒÓ´%ÔÕÖ×ØÙ.ÚÛÖÊËÜ Ý%Åލ£ß8à᳟%³Ö‰Ô՟âãäåæç 6 è¨m¼½%éêÐ(ëìÚÛÊËíîïð#Ñ%ñèÐ(

(6) ò¼½ óô.õDΗÑ%ö÷øùEú< ~%¨mû‘(üý¼½› œ€þ%žÛ.j6 †?ļ ›œ%¨mþ‘u %¼½tu

(7) è12!% 7° WTO %2¦§¨m¼½ ‘uvú6–—%!¨mrsu.m!%? %=‘óô Ù6éêBC!¨m"m#߈ëì¨m$Ö%¤é Å%Ð&'%³Ö()Æ*õ+ÎÔÕrsuI,.-./0I'm »%ˆ1234%h!56rsu%789:6 vwxyz%"{|}~~"XBudgetary Control SystemsY?JKd€ !}~.oƒPQ„ %*–H9:%?PQÅ=N;õ+ XCovaleski & Dirsmith, 1988Y6<=>>% bŽ%H?BC@d Aefg%€ij2lno˜B%=hd{|}~~%C=h!¨m rsu%–‰¼Z{|}~%=hDE¨mF€ÅòG9:{"Ç H%(IfgJK4@d%hDE  LMˆNO¢DP.}~¨mQ R6 S>"{|}~~"T?DE56  LUj¼½˜BV%†W/ ¾%XYS(Td{|}~~56%Z‘[i©{äo’%\k(] ^‰{| }~~ =‘ v‰ 8 56 %_€ 2G o’(Covaleski & Dirsmith, 1988)61É?>XÅ?S(¨mN`?¼½›œZad—~%S h

(8) èbcм½`*7Sd›œ"aefg%ûhG56?iÐTd{ |}~~€–H569:ÎijÅ cdkC õl%Z(=‘m j56¼½¾no%\E_€569:6R˜™*@A"{|} ~~.)š"%Xp"›œ<{|}~~bŽ  ¡"6 ˜q .wx8%*(Cameron et al., 1987 ; Mone & Mckinley, 1988 ; Alexander et al., 1993) !%2)* +,-./01Brstu234ž6†?v'-  8%w("9:;<-"XThreat-Rigidity-TheoryY(Staw et al., 1981)?@A BC–HEŸGHˆ‰-%?IJKLMN-OPQ-%1 2.

(9) ?R-VW6Raxyª¬­9:Sz{ª«¼ Å|}% ¸_µ¶¨mþ~e.ÊË(ƒ%ER˜#P%j*€ "¦§¨m.¼½`BCaH"‚ƒ„ -%‘[†^¦ §¨m‡£¬­®¯¼½9:6.  V*¾PˆSOR#R:%T*ƒ„‰M¼ Å|}ÒÓ¦ §¨m%‘[BC–H(Š‹ŒÎ<=>>%É?ŒBC b%ŽcdAefg%hijke?2lnopq ¼½tu6ShR ˆ˜™€´‘’[\ XPY{|}~~.#)šBC‚{|}~“?vDE ¨m‡£Þ)N`?c¨m”•–<‚ X·Y"9:;<-"(Threat-Rigidity-TheoryY?i°¨mbŽ vžŸ‚ X¹Y ¿ ¡‰C‚. 

(10)  XPYR³Ðú Rˆ

(11) xyª—°xª]¢˜™¬­®¯š›#$% 覧¨m1œêÜq¬­9:%Åe¾Ê¢¾56ZbŽº»9 :%*¦§¼ ¿%Ÿê2  ¡6—Ñ%¦§m ¿%1 –°XWTOY%%èv(S<Ξ«ŸlÊË ×% 1BáB¡ˆ 8%¢£ 1999 ¥ 1 ¤ 1 ]F%ž£

(12) +¥d%¢£ 2002 ¥ùb3dž£‰ž¦§d¨©%ž¦¼ ¨©¾ª)S_€«¬ ­®"d?YJ¯ 6éꞦ#Ñ%°±DG¢y²³´µ¶¦ *›œ@"3%2*¦§mŠ·«¬%1%è=h{ä ©6 ¦§¨mb¸¹¹Þhº}–»%¼Z=‘c56™n œ8%ShBCbɝ&³Ð%ij56=‘½Pž%É¿#PÀ6 ÁEÂ%R³Ðú=Zh´—’ÃŒ 1.ÄÅ@A{|}~~.#Ý)š6 2.ÄÅ;<-Hd*°¨m¾6 3.Œ ¿ ¡.36 X·Y-/»{äÆx R ’=hÇvŒ9:;<-?iv°¨mž Ÿ%{|}~~.)š%h›œ<–»?iv{|}~~ .)š8ÈÉPPˆÊË6*v/»€>%{Æxj 3.

(13) *ŒjF‘̇£ÒÓ¨m%7óô¾Í”C‚h{|} ~~8SÈÉÊË6.  - 8%?PQ&³Ð\6–‰ž ÛΛ%èv¼Ïç %Shˆ‰-wxyz%`a ÅÐ  j?P¹ÑÒX–7%EYjY%E(A'`Ó— ÔµXZammuto, 1984; Cameron et al., 1987; Amburgey et al., 1993; Gimeno et al., 1997Y6.   XPYGXDefining Organizational DeclineY Sèaj‰ˆ‰##P%†GÕN 7Ö

(14) ×Ø%Šv>ÙÚ6ÃÛ`S•+.SÜÝ>l%Þ PQZ(7^GBq%Shß(B´Gõ+àB"ÊËá Á.rsâ"Xshrinking markets and increased competitionYXPorter, 1980; Harrigan, 1982YÎB{|ã~¢"äåRæ~e%“”?Žçè" Xworkforce reduction-especially layoffsYXCornfield, 1983Y6éê% S‹?"Ÿæ~e"Xshrinking student enrollmentYXFreeman & Hanan, 1975YÎN?ëì~e67í>l%àB")lîÍ"Xloss of legitimacyYXBenson, 1975YÎB"őaHÁ~›œV"Xmaladaptation to a shrinking environmental nicheYXGreenhalgh, 1983YÎB"ïð¢ñ.,ò ó+% mj jè. -. Åô"Xstagnation, and deteriorating and unsatisfactory organizational performance that causes members and clients to become disgruntledYX Kolarska & Aldrich, 1980Y6 õÑ%ö(`GՉ"aH›œ‘ubŽ–<Lb "Xdeterioration in the organization's adaptation to its environmentYXGreenhalgh, 1984:232YÎE(]`Š÷‰"=cdfgM©I~NbŽt uÐ~eèNfg"Xrestricted resources and presssures to cut backYXCameron et al, 1987:127YÎN`?"±=du~e"Xdecrease in the number of organization personnelYXFord, 1980Y6 èE%RV*“ú%XpøÇù'wxXB Cameron et al., 1987; Mone & Mckinley, 1988; Alexander et al., 1933Y%GՉ" úb Žfg~eN?SÇûNü»#cÕý,%j?™?bŽ Lb"%*þ½¨mEÂ%Áó™?56¢½ìNÊË(ƒ ´ý6 X·Y£ßXOrganizational Decline ProcessY ÄЌGÕ%1=h<PQÊ€%É?ÃÛ 2-1-1" 4.

(15) £ß"€>Î<Â#%™?Z8·¹ç €G £ß6 –. . . . . • k-type. GH.  . !. • r-type. " •#$%&' •()*+ •, -. •/012 34" •565789: •;<=> •34?@ •AB&CD E5" •FGHIJK •LMN •O?PQ •RS.  2-1-1 £ß  Zammuto & Cameron, 1985. )*9:%=hOBh´ Q9: PQ9:%™"7(ÔµNVÊËaHu"X an organization's adaptation to its domain, or microniche, deterioratesYXGreenhalgh, 1983; Zammuto & Cameron, 1985Y6 ·Q9:%?"± fg~e"Xresources are reduced within the organizationY6 k*aHu=‰ ¹•+%™?"k-type"N"r-type"(Wilson, 1980Y6 "k-type"%™?‹äÁV›œN?m›œN36àB

(16) d .

(17) ÊËj%µ¶ .@™?S"k-type"6õÑ% "r-type"•+%?‹äÁV›œ?j%†STˆRŠ? %Eµ¶%àBŸ,ûû%N?Å)ÊËcÕû% BŸ?PQjÊË%†ŠÅ?ÞPQ56Z‘þ6 "k-type"%™?‹-.cՍ´ý8m%Ä?PQ56‘ Z CÊË(ƒ€%Xő¸Q9:GՉ6. 5.

(18) X¹Y›œ3 1.›œV3 bŽ%Ñ ›œ“ú%*‘ij–H%§J ?ÈÉÐÊË61É?>% ›œ3%vŸúÅlI~% –E1mj—QÅl!9:6›œ‘[K)jPQVÎ<=> >%PQV? ›œP "%CKG‰#QR=dfg%àB ¢w<¢-.56ûcÕ³X Zammuto and Cameron, 1985Y6 56Vv¼÷Ý3E%EV=‘vc56$% jN6 bŽ%=‘?V›œÁ %NV›œ3Î¸ ]3(&'¹!%àBûNü»cÕ~e¢&'NG⢠&mj+(Nû£¢N?Pu›œ8fg~e³6&'¹ › œ3%Z=‘mj6 V ¹3 %ZvmjP¹?V®(Á % Ð?)–*=dfg~eÎõP¹?56û*Ý3%Ð)–*cÕ ~e6¸]3%I~ê(Mˆ9:6P¹3mjm»Mˆ ®(Á η¹3cő+Mˆ7(m»®(%–—%ŽÔÕÖ QR6 A. B.  2-1-2 ›œV 3 Zammuto and Cameron, 1985.  2-1-2"›œV 3"S,O?PQV%! A © B% –?fgVW6V B ő#-(V A S#-QR%–‰= dfg~eXӝY%N?ûcÕý,XŒY6  2-1-3"›œV 3"%Sói?V#û ¿3%— G.ŒV›œ ZV/žÛ‰V0%XpV/–‰£%E‰V 0S16Ew(V/.V023 %?‰(V6<Â#% ‰êÕŸ4%537noó+õ+%ZV/‰V06. 6.

(19) B. A.  2-1-3 ›œV. 3. Zammuto and Cameron, 1985. 2.úXContinuousY.YúXUncontinuousY  ¡–»%éêV›œ3–»#Ñ%õѳР¡– »%?ú.i6™?=dfg%?6è%N? ú %Zv ¡©7+6Shэ›œ37+%ßj‰ –H³Ð)8–»XSchendel, Patton and Riggs, 1976Y6 E›œ3=K)U‰ ¹7+™ú3.Yú36 ú3%É?P¹2 üÌ3Î3?ÅÝg%Eph9:;% =hd€{<F€6Yú3%?6è3% 裤:;%=l {<F€6 ú3žŸ%v>b6žú%(' :v¤BC–H6–—%§JvœÅl ¡%c?9:? i‰ú%N‰Yú6. . !. Z*¼ ”;žÛ%BCaHLX§J?‹–@LbY%?P Q&M³?\6 `T"É<AÙ"Xevolutionary perspectiveY €@Ad*Ål›œ”:´ŸâãäXB Hanman and Freeman, 1997Y6 õP "`%j!"&ó~BAÙ"Xpolicy-oriented perspectiveY€@A BCjbN=ljbaH–@֛œXB Rubin, 1977; Staw et al., 1981Y6 XPY9:;<-XThreat-Rigidity-TheoryY(Staw et al., 1981Y PQdPQ9:9:´%%èvÛ+íCh9SID õ+€–H9:%†? E»NF›œa¼3%h9HGH=‘Å+ ad62l%hóIÁXdecision-making groupY=‘–‰d*tu9:¢; JÖfK%Nő}~8LGH%EcÆhóͤMú6 RIÐ-NÛ? Staw et al., X1981YSŒ"9:;<-" 7.

(20) XThreat-Rigidity-TheoryY%OP 2-4-1 "9:;<Λ"6 9:³( ›œk< ).  .   .

(21) .    . . 9:~l( ›œ  2-4-1. < ). 9:;<Λ. Staw et al., 1981. ?-^‰&'#ShvQRXdemiseY%?–‰7&S"9: ;<Λ"Xthreat rigidity cycleY%“”?STGHGH.9:¹! ÅS%—7=ò/(“T>üu6?-?+U8%V PUªb!QXindividualY¢WÁXgroupY.XorganizationY¹QÅl Xb€@ABC–H7=‘Ÿ ¡6. "#$$%& '( {|}~~JKd€"‰fgYDP— ZNÛX Dunk, 1989Y% C?  7j è no[ ‹ B% ? —õ &\u A ]#  û XCovaleski & Dirsmith, 1988Y6vwx¾%BC^£{|~€}~ ?&'`XB Otley, 1978ÎKenis, 1979ÎKamin & Ronen, 1981Î Imoisili, 1989ÎHarrison, 1993Y6õÑ Sutton  CallaHanX1987Yž+bŽº» nÞ56v_`l€ab7Ö/”:ÎKinney  McDanielX1989Y1(lc ž+6Ezzamel  BournX1990Yj@AvfKdebŽº»9:  ¡%E SticeX1991Yjž+bŽº»9:56%7º»fó.? 9:()6RjP&Ѐ@A{|}~~bŽSÈÉ ÊË6 BqSO%9:;<Λ7ê%–‰oƒ}~Ç%hÕ) bY.dg] ~efg%<{|}~~?³Ð„ 6èE%{| }~~?i‘Ö

(22) žho%hi+,%őPjE-%ñc? žŸ–!”EG6 8.

(23) NÛ Mone  MckinleyX1988YŒ¹-Ù%ÅlbÅl ›œvm(ÅlVXnicheYXCameron et al., 1987Y6rs›œ3( ¹VR Xquantitative changeYXqualitative changeYXZammuto, 1985Y6Zammuto  CameronX1985Y÷‰"VN7Á~"Xreduction in niche sizeY6›œ×‹ªÁfgNcÕ~e%nB°× CoéM© pq¼ë~e.

(24) r¼ë&ó ¡%—鑁ÇsŸtuvß7íü »%

(25) è~e6wB±°–Ÿqƒ´ýEµ¶"8xmŸ~e%— 1bŽ¼ ½›œÖLb6—Ñ%Byd*¼ Å|}ä% z={ëf¬~e% *Ö

(26) .|}cÕ1~M©t%

(27) €. m€>%¸1?›œ 6 õPõb%×‹úPSÇû.ü»%7cÕR¾ 3XZammuto, 1985Y%wK÷‰"V 3"Xmodifications in the niche shapeYXZammuto & Cameron, 1985Y6<Â#%1É?-.Å+56Ç ûNü»(cÕ%NcÕa36àB%-.=‘V*‚ƒ„

(28) Ç% E %*†‡

(29) %Ÿ

(30) ˆ€EÂ%™‰6N`Pu=‘A‰Š ‹ŒŽ%*Œ5 ‘ €%™‰›œ6éêÌë`cÕ3Ñ% õP=‘mj–‰Ö%àBfKVmP+’ŒÖ%XÅ P+"%Ìë`aÅ=‘,XÅûNü»(cÕ%fKˆ€€> ™?›œ%\k?Ÿ4“”6 R^‰¼½›œ%qO#9:;<-vad%— ?³Ù*oƒ.}~%hÕÆfg.fKIDYg%{|}~~ ò(E*£—~Þ)6†?%B’?9:%Ìë`*S ÇûNü»Å+(%ww?Poƒ}~%99v~$ÖõlT ˆ%(=‘vmj& •–6ShÃÛh¾wx@A%=h•jR —>¹ bŽ%E??˜–*¼½›œ%jN™ {|}~~(E*i9:Îh—>š bŽ% E??˜–*¼½›œ%jN™{|}~~vcÆ” :–<6. )*+,-. P "2)wx“Ë%?÷³›å(recoveryYœG XturnaroundYóô¾6 Hambrick and Schecter(1983) ?@Ajžmm8%260 z¨m Ÿäåæóô%í ž+žÛÖû?PQAoƒQR6"`jåæ óô)U‰¹Q!XPYf.jR¡¢Xasset/cost surgeryY%X·Yt uû.ÊËãéXselective product/market pruningY%X¹Y £R Xpiecemeal movesY6í ž+f.jR~eõ+=hKHd%Ĩmcd A N7‘@d6†Ä¨mcÐ"‘@d%j=hdtuûN ÊËã~7+6Ĩmd*"ÊË(ƒ%j=hTd £Róô6. 9.

(31) Nystrom œ StarbuckX1984Yv'56ˆ<¤%í A¥ 8TdP¶ 7%¸ Q7KS ‰"jµ ¶Í¦§ ž¨ "(success-breeds-failure syndrome)%¸Q7“É?¨m*7(C Ôµ£*

(32) 6¸?Z*¨m7RCÔµa¼J©Ýê%ShÔµç X^‰Å+cЪ«A¥›œ<6¸c cœÖrs`. ¬Ö[\%‰­®™–úΛnœ%jH¶u*¯Š£¤S Xb6<=>>%1É?аÅ+NαeNqn€h[\6 Levine(1985)*k²5Ÿ Z `%c5Ÿ Z `  7ÌìÁ~ˆR%‰7óô³Çõ+61É?Å+TdÌì{|ã~G Hõ+€–H%OÔµ`K´²Tdëìóô³Ç7+€–H 6Levine ‹Œ `H?¼µ?óô.¢›œ)8ú <e)ú6—Ñ%%ŽZ± @"õ+$Ö%€žÛó ô‘u.ü»‘u6†%Ž­®–‰º»ÀÁ[\%E~ê$Ö:v6 · "j?¶8@AÁ N7XdownsizingY.ÀÁQR XretrenchmentY6 Behn(1980)‹Œ `*ÀÁQR(7%зk¸%àBh G]’˜%Žã~{|¢BC¹}¢ºzN»ufg$m$ Ö:v³6èE%Behn ¼‹Œ9:%ÄÐ$ÖQR‘[j ˆ%%GÐ çXò/Ó*$ÖQR861É?%Ž‘½¾ê[\ S%dŸä9:€$mžÛäóô6 Perry(1986)ÐC¿*“TÁ~ tuPQa Á~ó ô6Perry ‹Œ‘QÁ~õÀ%PQõÀad* `ò2lm8 í 56‰åæLb%èE¸]Ÿ4óô%ÁÂV"â~e ;Ä¢~ųõÀ6õPQóôjÇH Ð3õ%%N?Ð!PQVÔ µÆ©õPQ VÔµ9:6— `SÐTˆ?³Öžóô% ´²ÇÈ¢56± EÉÊP¢ËdQ”CZ-[³³6 Hardy(1987)Á~OjRj̉Û%í^‰Ä?Á~£ ß8%Ä?=l(o %kCP¹Á~õ+Zv(7abjR4 6¸] ¡ÁÂèV¹}ý,¢Vv/0¢Íb΢³Ð‘.¼ ÈîÍ6Hardy ^‰Á~óôH??K "F€P¹Óf%EY?‰êh £¤[\P¹ÏØaÐGH6 è‰êij¸c˜B%%Žae Á~£ß8‘QÐ)8Xb%àBÑÒ¢º&[\¢5ü¢ÓÔÕ5¢ þÆ#³6 Sutton(1983)‹Œ% PQ56ÖÕ7ç~OèV=‘(G H%ÁŸu´ý¢èV×V⢻ØèV׋ÙE¢«6â 6Sutton ¼‹Œ `SЈk»%Áڢ§Û¢·Ü¢ $m¢7ݳ% `%ŽbÅÞßk»6. 10.

(33)  /012 ÃÛ˜%XpøÇ2)-./0XStaw et al.,1981; Harrison, 1993; Zammuto & Cameron, 1985Y%=h ×R#-à¿B 3-1-16R S@A? bŽ%Ä?Td{|}~~*=‘Ÿ  ¡6—Ñ%?iv–‰›œ<9:ÅlE{|}~~v(ÅlG H%Xp@A{|}~~*no ¡Xb6. . #$%&. ! ".  3-1-1. #$'(. R#-à¿. R-à¿Нæ(š’XPY%X·Y{|}~~ %X¹Y›œ<%XšYno6áRSŒНæ÷B´ XPY bŽfg~eNSÇûNü»c Õý,(Cameron et al., 1987 ; Mone & Mckinley, 1988 ; Alexander et al., 1993)6 X·Y{|}~~™Puž#{|%?— Z‰êfgYE ¼£&\Êu#%1?oƒno¡¢Bq(Covaleski & Dirsmith, 1988)6 X¹Y›œ< 1¢›œ‹›œ<cªÁfgNcÕ~e(Zammuto & Cameron, 1985)6 2¢›œúPSÇûNü»cÕ%7VR¾ (ê3(Zammuto & Cameron, 1985)6 3¢9:;<-Z Staw et al.* 1981 ¥Œ%â,O÷ bŽ9:%7jè–oƒ¢fK}~Ç%• jGH¾;<%™P9:;<–úΛ(Staw et al., 1981)6 XšYno*‘ij#ô×ãäfgXKenis, I., 1979Y6. 345678 11.

(34) XPY

(35) æ%P?i%NRGÕ%Zh´—’€ hGX1Y½mì´ýX2Y´ýX3Y56ûÊË(ƒ´ ýX4YFi{|˜B6h¾kCP’剋B6†?¹ ’š’%–‰=lÆ/$fæ%çRThP’·’‰

(36) æhG–»6 X·YPˆæ›œ<%w‰.6?ZM<`A^G.ø Ç?56#Ö/¼½›œEÆ6 X¹Y8èæ{|}~~%‰ ’(.=X=TdY6 XšY–æno%¼‰ ’(=&XN&Y6¸=Z Q õb€[%™?!/$fæM<`%R `éTd6. 9:;&< R®(?h¦§˜q¾Ê¢¾ê"(I56‰ëÁÎ쌾 Ê¢¾567½ìí+`‰B566*¸]B56îŒ[ ï%hÕfæ%Xhð6¸]B56%R?hñòó¥‰Vq%Ä ñòô¥½ì.í+™j‰cR%+¸]567ñòõ¥½ ì.?G‰N?%h@A{|}~~*56  ¡Xb%Xh@A9:Ål56%?iZ*7T–Hõ+Ål%ûµ ¶7Ýþó+Íö6. )=>0?@ RNÛqOR:¢-à¿.¢bŽ T$Öõl¢9:;<¢{|}~~³-%XD°¨mbŽ÷¥ €›œ<S=‘(–Hˆ‰.ˆR%Œh´‘Q.2)#/0 —> 

(37)  @A.56T$Öõl)¶ú6P&ð°¨mbŽ %?ivœ9:;<-S=‘žŸ9:6<Â#% R—>KL M%=h-¦§¨mœ%=‘vŸ9:;<-9:6 . !"#$%&. @A{|}~~.noÝ2)ú6hê?ivh {|}~~€‚no6 '()*+,-./0"1234"56"+,7 89: !";<=> @A›œ¢{|}~~.noÝ2)ú6P&È0%  bŽ›œ%v{|}~~%hi9:Î <=>>%{|}~~=h›œ8‚no6 12.

(38) ?()*+,-./0"1234"@6"+,7 89ABCD>EFG @A›œ¢{|}~~.noÝ)¶ú6XpP& ð%ÄT{|}~~%cÆ9:‰–<%–‰ {|}~~›œ8%X=l‚no6. AB0CD;E%F%GH XPY[ï#( R[ï#ž<È\˜%åø¼wxª{ø<¤%õûGÀ6 R”D½mì.ùqú56žŒ[ï%–—*fæð ‰½mì.ùqú õb€@A6M<,‰º»¼N7í "ç %h(ûüý{|~`‰»6j¾%Pz56ÏcPÉM<`6V *×þêmùb”:%—ÅXÅIGúPQm6 R[ô P "‰›œ<t’η ‰{|}~ t’ι "‰›œ<T$Öõl# ¡t’Κ ?( )*no!t’Îó ?()*¬­®¯56 ¡t’Îô. "‰56VRfæt’6«[ï±%OP6 P "dhð56œ›œ%*%N? 6· dhð{|}~~*56 ¡Xb6¹ @A› œ<*T$Öõl ¡%‰­®ïê ¬%1 ?[ï%R[[ï8>%Ot³ ˆ&¬Ö6 š "‰[7{|}~~%"Ÿu¢!ü»û¢ ý,èV#Rƒ¢ÚÛÊË(ƒ¢ý,2jR¢‚56ªÁnoo’? iy÷%tYJl×¢l×¢ÅòG¢Ål×¢YJÅl×ó¹ß%"‰R ê{|}~~*i9: ¡6ó "‰()¬­®¯ t’%hꍬ­®¯—m ¡%h—m–Hõ+6 X·Y.o 1.o óbo.±o¾%Z*RXYD P¿bÔµˆ%– —&ÞD± ˆSCz %†R[ï\˜(¾éøÇh 9wx 

(39) %–— Ŷ* \©·6EP]¿b"¾%Td7í `Ӟ#ó%–—(E*".o6 2. Rd Cronbach's €µ<— "ó%ó 3-5-1 ¤½mì .þ56#[ï— ä ó 3-5-1 –»¿b. [ï— # Cronbach's  ä ½mì56 þ56 13.

(40) no‚ ›œ T$Öõl ›œ{|}~~ ›œ ›œ{|}~~ . 0.8554 0.8655 0.6906 0.8466 0.7218 0.7295 0.3646. 0.8685 0.7672 0.6779 0.8649 0.6338 0.7494 .3648. TUV. k* Cronbach's äI,LMBqä%MerchantX1985Y^‰I,=LM I‰ 0.5-0.6 #Ý%ShR[ï— %éê ,* Merchant X1985Y 

(41)  0.5 h´Ñ%7é 0.6 h¾?=hLM6E  # Cronbach's äA,–%=‘?–‰7w( Q[’6. . !"#. IJKL Rfæì¶ÐTî[ï%[ï,?¦§b´¾Ê¢¾ 86 ¥½ìœí+566½ì56õb%88 ¥ 3 ¤ 22 ]ì 56[ï 142 "688 ¥ 4 ¤ 23 ]€ìUx%䟀ì 57 "%[ï€ìƒ i 40.1%%78=o[ï 5 "%(o[ï 52 "8( 52 zò/(/H{|}~~ %(o[ï€ìƒ 36.61%6–—%½ì56õb%™h 52 zcRfæ" ð6 56õb%88 ¥ 3 ¤ 24 ]îŒ56[ï 153 "688 ¥ 4 ¤ 25 ]€ìUx%䟀ì[ï 70 "%[ï€ìƒi 45.75%%78=o[ï 10 "%(o[ï 60 "8ò/(/H{|}~~56( 60 "%(o[ï€ ìƒ 39.21%6–—%56õb%™h— 60 zcRfæ"ð6. îŒ[ï €ì[ï (o[ï. ó 4-1-1 [ï€ìPó ½ì56 þ56 æ˜ €ìƒ æ˜ €ìƒ 142 153 57 40.1% 70 45.75% 52 36.61% 60 39.21% fæ€gR. 14.

(42) BMNIJOP RˆÐ?ÃÛ½ì56.þ56cRfæ%@A56 N7.56$֏{|}~~56 ¡+:6. cRVRfæð 1.½ì56VRfæ ó 4-2-1 ½ì56N7Pó 56fR 56½m £h´               XY£h´                XY k£               XYk£               XY k£               XYk£               XY  £h¾              XY  £h¾              XY 56æ 56Sm 100 h´ 6 X12Y žmm                  X Y 100 k 200  8 X15Y ¬­m                  X  Y 200 k 500  14 X27Y ü»m                  X Y 500 k 1000  15 X29Y !<m                  X  Y 1000 h¾ 9 X17Y ½ m                  X  Y 7í                    X  Y TUV. R½ì56cRfæªjó 4-2-16ÃÛcRežmm  z¢¬­m  z¢ü»m  z¢!<m  z¢½ m  z¢7íˆm  z6Z h¾ fæyz%½ì56hžmmI'%!<mIe6cR56fR e  £h´  z¢ k  £  z¢ k  £  z¢ £h ¾  z656½me  £h´  z¢ k  £  z¢  k  £  z¢ £h¾  z656æe 100 h´ 6 z¢100 k 200  8 z¢200 k 500  14 z¢500 k 1000  15 z¢1000 h¾ 9 z6 Zh¾fR¢½mhèVæ€Ã% '*8 566 2.þ56VRfæ Rþ56cRfæªjó 4-2-26ÃÛcRežmm  z¢¬­m  z¢ü»m  z¢!<m  z¢½ m  z¢7íˆm  z6c R56fRe  £h´  z¢ k  £  z¢ k  £  z¢  £h¾  z656½me  £h´  z¢ k  £  z¢  k  £  z¢ £h¾  z656æe 100 h´ 4 z¢100 k 200  7 z¢200 k 500  20 z¢500 k 1000  10 z¢1000 h¾ 19 z6. 15.

(43) ó 4-2-2 þ56N7Pó 56fR 56½m £h´               XY£h´                XY k£               XYk£               XY k£              XYk£              XY  £h¾              XY  £h¾             XY 56æ 56Sm 100 h´ 4 X 7Y žmm                 X  Y 100 k 200  7 X12Y ¬­m                  X  Y 200 k 500  20 X31Y ü»m                 X Y 500 k 1000  10 X17Y !<m                  X  Y 1000 h¾ 19 X33Y ½ m                  X  Y 7í                    X  Y TUV. X·Y56–H›œ<T$Öõlß ù' wx‹ŒXCameron, K.S. 1983Y%£ß8%j è*$֝¬ 'vT"#$ %†h´R*¦§¨m [ï8%° €@A¦§¨mbŽ%?i1vT"#$ %EÞ h$Ö6 1.½ì56 Äø €@A½ì567÷¥€$ÖXb%ST³. ¬6 ó 4-2-3 ½ì56* ¿$Öß  ¿                   zæ                       %>  ç~ Z                                             & jk»                                          & "fK ZÉç                                      &  56à¿'ü<                                   &  â(ûž Z                                     & TUV. !ó4-2-3ð%½ì56‰–H›œ<% ¿ST $Ößõb%Tç~ Z(  z¢jk» (  z¢ "fK ZÉç(  z¢56à¿'ü<(  z¢â(û ž Z(  z6Z—=P% ¿3mõb%'(¨mvhj k» 56à¿'ü<€–H6—Ñ%¼(¨m/H¨ m+m¢â7íWm ³GH6. 16.

(44) ó 4-2-4 ½ì56*¨m#ß$Öß ¨m#ß                   zæ                      %>  )<fó                                            & m»#ß³ª.)<                                  & TUV. ¨m#ß$Ößõb% =Zó4-2-4€ð%T)<f ó(  z¢m»#ß³ª.)<(  z6 ShZefæ=hÆÑ. 56vhm»#ß³ª.)<€–H6—Ñ%1(7í56T *Ñ.°±+,¸-¢`5./<³GH6  ó 4-2-5 ½ì56*no¡¢$Öß no¡¢                   zæ                      %>  k²~³ 3                                    &  ×·k8$~                                    & !0~³ 3                                    &  ×B1~                                        & TUV. ó4-2-5=hÆÑ%no¡¢$Ößõb%Tk²~³. 3(  z¢ ×·k8$~(  z¢!0~³ 3(  z¢ ×B1~(  z6. 56éh ×·k8$~€– H6—Ñ%1(7í56@dûQR%N?õD ³~6 !ó4-2-6ð%½ì56*2èVû·$Ößõb%T 3ûèVd'm»(  z¢45èV‹u"m‘u(  z¢ ´²èVhó£ß(  z¢3èV67õ+(  z6Ze fæ=hÌ. 56郄èV‘[‹×d'm»6 ó 4-2-6 ½ì56*2èVû·$Öß 2èVû·               zæ                       %>  3ûèVd'm»                               & 45èV‹u"m‘u                                 & ´²èVhó£ß                                 & 3èV67õ+                                     &  TUV. 2.þ56 L÷ €@Aþ56‰–H›œ<.%7÷¥€ $ÖXb%ST³ ¬6Äø%=Zó 4-2-7 €ð¨m ¿$Öß6 þ56‰–H›œ<% ¿ST$Ößõb%T 17.

(45) ç~ Z(  z¢jk» (   z¢"fK ZÉç (  z¢56à¿'ü<(  z¢â(ûž Z(  z6 Z—=P% ¿3mõb%'(¨mvhjk» 56 à¿'ü<€–H6—Ñ%¼(56Tâ7í½m Z³ õ+6 ó 4-2-7 þ56* ¿$Öß  ¿                   zæ                       %>  ç~ Z                                             & jk»                                           & "fK ZÉç                                     & 56à¿'ü<                                   & â(ûž Z                                     & TUV. ó 4-2-8 yz%¨m#ß$Ößõb%T)<fó(  z¢ m»#ß³ª.)<(  z6 ShZefæ=hÆÑ. 56v hm»#ß³ª.)<€–H6—Ñ%¼(56TR89:;< =5Û¢ž">&?&@³QR6  ó 4-2-8 þ56*¨m#ß$Öß ¨m#ß                   zæ                      %>  )<fó                                            & m»#ß³ª.)<                                  & TUV. ó4-2-9yz%no¡¢$Ößõb%Tk²~³ 3 (  z¢ ×·k8$~(  z¢!0~³ 3(  z¢  ×B1~(  z6. 56éh ×·k8$~€–H 6  ó 4-2-9 þ56*no¡¢$Öß no¡¢                   zæ                      %>  k²~³ 3                                    &  ×·k8$~                                    & !0~³ 3                                     &  ×B1~                                        & TUV. Zó4-2-10yz%½ì56*2èVû·$Ößõb%T 3ûèVd'm»(  z ¢45èV‹u"m‘u(  z¢ 18.

(46) ´²èVhó£ß(  z¢3èV67õ+(  z6Ze fæ=hÌ. 56郄èV‘[‹×d'm»6õÑ%3 èV67õ+jÅ#6 ó 4-2-10 þ56*2èVû·$Öß 2èVû·               zæ                       %>  3ûèVd'm»                               & 45èV‹u"m‘u                                 & ´²èVhó£ß                                 & 3èV67õ+                                     & TUV. X¹Y56Z‰jóô ½ì56.þ56%Z‰j#zæ%>%=Zó 4-2-11 €ð ó 4-2-11 zæ %>. 56‰j9:#ð ½ì56 þ56 33 25 63.46 41.66 *WX7YZ[\1]T^_YZ7Y TUV. 1.½ì56Z‰jóô *56Z‰jóô% ñèøZ½ì56€ ð6¸êSðA‰56%T?h 87 ¥/$½ì2* 86 ¥½ì ‰j566ÃÛ/$fæyz%RcR8%86 ¥í+56%  87 ¥‰j( 33 z%S(cR 63.466 ó 4-2-12 ½ì56jóô óô                       zæ                       %>  {|}~~                                     & 3ûˆóô                                     & ÓÖž                                     & ‚56fK<ß                                 & ï)u                                             & `WX7YZ[\abc^_YZ7Y TUV. Zó4-2-12% =hž+½ì56A‰óô%T{| }~~(  z¢3ûˆóô(  z¢ÓÖž 19.

(47) (  z¢‚56fK<ß(  z¢ï)u(  z6õÑ% ¼(7í56T'Ê<¢PªB-.ÊË¢ˆÓgˆ#@R¢ ˆÀ34~³6 2.þ56A‰óô *þ56@A%¸êSðA‰56%T?h 87 ¥ /$þ2* 86 ¥þ‰j566ÃÛ/$fæyz%RcR 8%86 ¥í+56% 87 ¥A‰( 25 z%S(cR 41.666 Zó4-2-13% =hž+½ì56A‰óô%T{| }~~(z¢3ûˆóô(  z¢ÓÖž (  z¢ÓÖž(  z¢ï)u(  z6õÑ%¼ (7í56T3û ¿¢ý,C4¢â#§¢¶I ®î}~7+¢Ñ£ D¢ý,ŸjR³6 ó 4-2-13 þ56A‰óô óô                       zæ                       %>  {|}~~                                     & 3ûˆóô                                      & ÓÖž                                     & ‚56fK<ß                                 & ï)u                                             & `WX7YZ[\abc^_YZ7Y TUV. QR0STUVQW2X — "Ð?@A–H#hóÇH–»¿b6Rd–»ð 8ÐjlœöæEI lXVarimaxY!W–»ð%tŒ“ä. * 1 õQ¿b%7Fë÷‰ 71.8G6Pu–»¿b%B’ä. * 0.7%óz72 "%è* 0.7 œ 0.35 #Ý%józH=%,* 0.35% j‰,%ER7 Cronbachäå"* 0.35%óz7(2 XI x½³%þ° 82 ¥Y%–—ÉhõQ–»¿b€1ó–H#hóÇH –»%X7âJB´ 1¢–»Pno–»%2¢–»·›œ–»%3¢–»¹ T$Öõl–»%4¢–»š›œ{|}~~–»%5¢–»ó ›œ–»%6¢–»ô›œ{|}~~–»%7¢–»õ –» áÉó 4-3-1 .ó 4-3-2%”!½ì.þð#hóÇ H–»¿b•j6 ó 4-3-1. –H½ì#hóÇH–»–»ÍKó 20.

(48) defg. hijk Cronbach p lmnjko lqrso. Ž‹. 16.6813 l16.6813o. 0.8554 l4.3371o. €. 15.3542 l32.0356o. 0.8655 l3.9921o. ©ª R‘&«. 9.7997 l41.8353o. 0.6906 l2.5479o. €³´ -.µ¶¶· k. 9.1111 l50.9465o 7.6486 l58.5952o 7.3736 l65.9688o. 0.8466 l2.3689o. 5.8461 l71.8150o. 0.3646 l1.5200o. k³´ -.µ¶¶· . 0.7218 l1.9886o 0.7295 l1.9171o. tu@Qde. devwk. xyz{ x|}~€ ‚ƒF„ † x|‡ˆ‰Š† x|FG‹† ‚ŒaT x|4Ž‹ ‘’“{ z”•–—˜ ‘/™š› Hœ>žŸ  ¡„¢DS Ž‹£¤D ¥¦ƒF§¨ d¬­®¯u° R‘{±² š›R‘ $¸H¹º »fDS dH¹º x|{’“ x|‡ˆ‰Š† d¬­®¯u° ¼½¬­®¯. 0.8092 0.8172 0.7148 0.5750 0.8613 0.6872 0.7230 0.7803 0.7739 0.7616 0.8186 0.6362 0.7862 0.8340 0.6809 0.8679 0.8181 0.8585 0.7072 0.7342 0.7973 0.5502 0.6809 0.6064 TUV. ó 4-3-2 defg. –Hþ#hóÇH–»–»ÍKó. hijk Cronbach p lmnjko lqrso. Ž‹. 13.9634 l13.9634o. 0.8685 l3.6304o. €. 11.6298 l25.5932o. 07672 l3.0237o. ©ª R‘&«. 10.5212 l36.1145o. 0.6779 l2.7355o. €³´ -.µ¶¶· k. 10.2892 l46.4037o 8.7733 l55.1771o 8.6178. 0.8469 l2.6752o 0.6338 l2.2810o 0.7494. k³´. 21. tu@Qde xyz{ x|}~€ ‚ƒF„ † x|‡ˆ‰Š† x|FG‹† ‚ŒaT x|4Ž‹ ‘’“{ z”•–—˜ ‘/™š› Hœ>žŸ  ¡„¢DS Ž‹£¤D ¥¦ƒF§¨ »fDS R‘{±² š›R‘ $¸H¹º ž¾¿À dH¹º. devwk 0.3461 0.7129 0.7041 0.5399 0.7728 0.7299 0.5871 0.8526 0.6511 0.7180 0.6700 0.6010 0.7958 0.7788 0.6538 0.7414 07353 0.7666 0.7251 0.7718.

(49) -.µ¶¶·. l63.7949o. . 7.7799 l71.5749o. l2.2406o x|{’“ x|‡ˆ‰Š† 0.3648 d¬­®¯u° l2.0227o ¼½¬­®¯. 0.7211 0.5704 0.5551 0.5114 TUV. )&YZ[\78 '(0]^_`;GH "9:;<-"^‰% 56bŽ9:%v}~%E ~eLÕ$Ö:v%j(=‘c‰›œSMN6‰êŒ. T$Öõl?i=‘4G%)š%l1?‰êO0°¨mbŽ ´%?ivŸ9:;<-9:6–—%Rø. T  $ Ö õ l   ˆ " P Q R ë Í 2 )  ð " X Pearson Product-moment CorrelationY6ShÆ© ’”‰ó 4-4-1 .ó 4-4-26 ó 4-4-1. ½ì56#PQRëÍ2)ðó. X¢T$ÖõlY  T$Öõl 1 0.1690 Pearson Correlation  0.1690 1 T$Öõl 0.2309 Sig.X2-tailedY  0.2309 T$Öõl TUV. Zó 4-4-1 =Ñ%56½ì9:´%.T$Öõl Ý)š%‰Åy÷61É?#R#—>P%<=>>%ɽì56 EÂ%.T$Öõl(=‘?íG%)š6יO0ê9:;< -9:%?(=‘žŸbŽ¦§¨my¾6 ó 4-4-2. þ56#PQRëÍ2)ðó. X¢T$ÖõlY  T$Öõl 1 -0.0279 Pearson Correlation  -0.0279 1 T$Öõl 0.8318 Sig.X2-tailedY  0.8318 T$Öõl TUV. Zó 4-4-2 =Ñ%þ56ê%.T$ÖõlÝ) š%‰Åy÷61É?#R#—>P%<=>>%.T$ Öõl=‘?jG%)š6–—%¦§¨m%œ9:%NèvŒ +9:;<-9:6. Aab"#$$% cFd +e0]^_`;GH 22.

(50) ‰êŒ{|}~~.noÝ?i4y÷2)ú%hßP &@A{|}~~*.# ¡”:%–— ”h ½ì56.þ56%ø{|}~~.noˆ "PQRëÍ2)ð" XPearson Product-moment CorrelationY % ’”Bó 4-5-1 .ó 4-5-26 ó 4-5-1. ½ì56#PQRëÍ2)ðó. Xno¢{|}~~Y no {|}~~ 1 0.3652** Pearson Correlation no 0.3652** 1 {|}~~ 0.0099 Sig.X2-tailedY no 0.0099 {|}~~ **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 levell2-tailedo TUV. Zó 4-5-1 =Ñ%56½ì9:´%{|}~~.‚ noÝ)š%‰y÷

(51) 2)61ÉO0êR#—>·%56½ì 9:´%{|}~~.no‚(

(52) %)š6 ó 4-5-2. þ56#PQRëÍ2)ðó. Xno¢{|}~~Y no {|}~~ 1 0.5826** Pearson Correlation no 0.5826** 1 {|}~~ 1.9909E-06 Sig.X2-tailedY no 1.9909E-06 {|}~~ **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 levell2-tailedo TUV. Zó 4-5-2 =Ñ%56þ9:´%{|}~~.‚ noÝ)š%‰y÷

(53) 2)61ÉO0êR#—>·%56þ 9:´%{|}~~.no‚(

(54) %)š6. fab"#$$%&gh3;63'(0]^_`;G H R”h½ì56.þ56%€@A›œ´. ›œ´%{|}~~# ¡”•%hO0R—>¹ bŽ%E??˜–*¼½›œ""%jN™{|}~ ~(E*i9:.—>š bŽ%E?? ˜–*¼½›œ""%jN™{|}~~vcÆ”:– 23.

(55) <66R—>¹—>šS)7+B´ Y=+TX1+T1X2+T2X1X2 Yno X1›œ< X2{|}~~ XPY½ì56 ó 4-6-3. ›œ.{|}~~72U"d*no ‚#€)ðóX½ì56Y æ ¢ä BqÍ tä Pä 61.3418 19.2452 3.1873 0.0026 Jæ -3.0649 1.7033 -1.7994 0.0786 ›œ -3.2808 1.4860 -2.2078 0.0323 {|}~~ 0.2719 0.1319 2.0614 0.0450 2U"d Ád^ÂŽ‹ TUV. Zó 4-6-3 ð%2U"d€)šæ‰ 0.2719%P0.0450%=hÆэ ›œ´{|}~~=h‚no%–‰2U"d.no ?íy÷

(56) 2)6–—%1ÉO0êR—>¹%›œ´% {|}~~(E*i9:6 ó 4-6-4. ›œ¢{|}~~72U"d*no ‚#€)ðóX½ì56Y æ ¢ä BqÍ tä Pä 17.1256 2.4666 6.9428 8.3216E-09 Jæ 0.3781 0.2514 1.5038 0.1397 ›œ 0.5922 0.2157 2.7224 0.0092 {|}~~ -0.3518 0.1664 -2.1134 0.0402 2U"d Ád^ÂŽ‹ TUV. Zó 4-6-4 ð%2U"d€)šæä‰-0.3518%P0.0402%=hÆэ ›œ´%{|}~~vµ¶noíÍ%<%1É?> vcÆ9:‰–<%–‰2U"d’.no?í+y÷Í%2 )6B—ð ’%1ÉÈ0êR—>š6. 24.

(57) X·Yþ56 ó 4-6-5. ›œ.{|}~~72U"d*no ‚#€)ðóXþ56Y æ ¢ä BqÍ tä Pä -6.3014 11.0307 -0.5712 0.5702 Jæ 2.6845 1.5576 1.7234 0.0907 ›œ 2.6024 0.9654 2.6956 0.0094 {|}~~ -0.2207 0.1358 -1.6249 0.1102 2U"d Ád^ÂŽ‹ TUV. Zó 4-6-5 ð%2U"d P0.1102%=hÆэ›œ´=l0 /{|}~~.no)š6–—%1É=l#R—>¹% ›œ´%{|}~~(E*i9:6†¾ó ð8%{|}~~€)šæä‰ 2.6024%P0.0094%yè{|} ~~%*no‚ñè(y÷

(58) %Æx6k*vŸ=lO0—>  ’%=‘?–‰þ56%^‰{|}~~%*i#þ 9:XÅ?VPõ+%õÑàB3ˆõ+%1=hi 9:%?h ’yz—’e ’Xő#—>¹6 ó 4-6-6. ›œ¢{|}~~72U"d*no ‚#€)ðóXþ56Y æ ¢ä BqÍ tä Pä -6.0768 9.6177 -0.6318 0.5302 Jæ 1.5844 0.8895 1.7812 0.0807 ›œ 1.8349 0.5656 3.2441 0.0020 {|}~~ -0.1009 0.0509 -1.9821 0.0527 2U"d Ád^ÂŽ‹ TUV. Zó 4-6-6 ð%2U"d€)šæä‰-0.1009%P0.0527%=hÆэ ›œ´%{|}~~vµ¶noíÍ%<%1É?> vcÆ9:‰–<%–‰2U"d.no?í+y÷Í%2)6 B—ð ’%1ÉÈ0êR—>š6. ijk=Cl_`OP áRV=—(µG ’WäBó 4-7-1 .ó 4-7-2 Sz6 ó 4-7-1 ½ì56V=—(µG ’Wä ½mì56 —>P.T$Öõl?jG%)š6 —>·{|}~~(E*no‚6 25. # #.

(59) —>¹ bŽ%E??˜–*¼½›œ""% jN™{|}~~(E*i9:6 —>š bŽ%E??˜–*¼½›œ""% jN™{|}~~vcÆ”:–<6. # #. TUV. ó 4-7-2. þ56V=—(µG ’Wä þ56 —>P.T$Öõl?jG%)š6 # —>·{|}~~(E*no‚6 # —>¹ bŽ%E??˜–*¼½›œ""% Å# jN™{|}~~(E*i9:6 —>š bŽ%E??˜–*¼½›œ""% # jN™{|}~~vcÆ”:–<6 TUV. $!%& _ ZqPˆ#ð ’=hÆ©´ - XPY’ðõb 1¢½ì56BCT$Öõlh–H›œ<% ¿õb%( 55.76G56vTjk» õ+΍¨m#ßõb%( 71.15G 56vTm»#ß³ª.)<õ+΍no¡¢õb%( 42.30G5 6vT ×·k8$~õ+΍2èVû·õb%( 55.76G5 6vT3ûèVd'm»õ+6Zh¾ ’=hÌ%½ì5 6–H$Öõ+%vhû)<#߀d6 2¢)*þ56T$Öõl–H›œ<% ¿õb%( 56.66 G56vTjk» õ+΍¨m#ßõb%( 80.00G56 vTm»#ß³ª.)<õ+΍no¡¢õb%( 61.66G56v T ×·k8$~õ+΍2èVû·õb%( 68.33G56v T45èV‹×"m‘uõ+6Zh¾ ’=hÌ%lcþ 56–H$Öõ+%1vhû)<#߀d6 3¢½ì56Z‰jóô%( 60.60G56vT {|}~~¢57.57G56vT3ûˆóô¢( 60.60G5 6vTï)u6Zh¾ð=Ñ%BC½ì56‰j 56%. 56vT{|}~~¢Áu3óôõ+6 4¢þ56Z‰jóô%( 68.00G56vT {|}~~¢64.00G56vT3ûˆóô6Zh¾ð= 26.

(60) Ñ%BCþ56‰j56%. 56vT{|} ~~3óôõ+6 5¢–H½ì#hóÇH–»%=h‰õQ¿b%™no¢ ›œ¢T$Öõl¢›œ{|}~~¢› œ¢›œ{|}~~¢6¸õQ¿bäF ë÷ö 71.8510G%Sh%(2 ÷‘u6 6¢–Hþ#hóÇH–»%=h‰õQ¿b%™no¢ ›œ¢T$Öõl¢›œ{|}~~¢› œ¢›œ{|}~~¢6¸õQ¿bäF ë÷ö 71.5749G%Sh%1H(2 ÷‘u6 X·Y—(O0õb 1¢¼ZRð%.T$Öõl=‘?íG%)š6 <=>>%¨m9:%AÅvT$Öõl€–HΖ—% ¦§¨mœ9:%NèvŒ+9:;<-9:6 2¢no.{|}~~2)úð8% =hÆ© ?%{|}~~.no‚(

(61) %)š6–—% œ 9:%đ{|}~~%H?(E*no‚6 3¢›œ9:8%=hO0R—>¹% ½ì bŽ*%{|}~~(E*i9:61É bŽ?cÕ~e9:%{|}~~?=hi9:6† ?%þ ’Š=l#R—>¹6k*vŸ=l# —> ’%=‘?–‰þ56%^‰{|}~~%*i #þ9:XÅ?VPõ+%õÑàB3ˆõ+%1=hi 9:%?h ’yz—’e ’Xő#—>¹6 4¢›œ9:8%=hO0R—>š% bŽ ?*%{|}~~c”:‰–<6<=>>% ¨mbŽ?-.cÕ39:%=ld{|}~~€i 9:6. mn V*/0 ’%R 

(62) B´ XPY*¨m¼½` 

(63) R/0 ’yz% ¨m¼½›œ%àB¼ Å|}Nc Õ~e%¨mH?T{|}~~€no.}~%(E*¨m £›œ6†?%ĨmSœ©?¼½›œ%àBcÕ 3%R^‰{|}~~?X(YE6¨mH?ÔÕ$֝ ¬õ+€–H›œ<%†?Pu¨m ZÅZ1Å[ÔÕ£ $ Ö%–‰S\Ã®î© %Ä?ͦ>%56(=‘1=l!]F€6 27.

(64) X·Y` 

(65) Rþ56*›œefæ8%{|}~~*n o‚XFí+y÷ ’%R^‰?þ56^‰(7íPˆ æ ¡%(™F€`ò^6 7Å%RT[ïP^õ+%F€@dQÀ/È(!W!_ %?äÆTdõ+6N`¼=DÅlm%>Aúð6. ' o,pG 1¢Ix½¢`ab%þ° 82 ¥%"fKdeª)o^ ¡–»#'XÅ7+ ð"%2 f%Vol.13%No.2%12 ¤%pp17-416 2¢cde%þ° 80 ¥%'ð%fghL%ši6 3¢`°j¢wkP¢lmn¢o¼p%þ° 82 ¥%qvˆ‰X¾¢ ´rY%xfhL6 4¢’st%þ° 74 ¥%¨mªÁ{|7}~#%°×&\ v SFŒiu¹-w%pp.86. q,pG 1.. Alexander, J.A., M.L. Fennel, and M.T. Halpern, 1993, Leadership Instabilityin Hospitals: The Influence of Board-CEO Relations and Organization Growth and Decline, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, pp.74-99.. 2.. Allen Sweeny, H. W., and R. Rachlin, 1987 'Handbook of Budgeting-Second Edition.'. 3.. Allmendinger, J., and J.R. Hackman, 1996, Organizations in Changin g Environments: The Case of East German Symphony Orchestras, Administrative Science quarterly, 41, pp.337-369.. 4.. Amburgey, T.L., D. Kelly, and W.P. Barnett, 1993, Resetting the clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure., Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, pp.51-73.. 5.. Behn, R.D., 1980, Leadership for Cut-back Management:The Use of Corporate Strategy, Public Administrative Review, 40, pp.613-620.. 6.. Benson, J.K., 1975. "The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy." Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, pp.229-249. 28.

(66) 7.. Biederman, H.R. 1980, 'Budgeting and Its Relationship to The Economic Environment.' Handbook of Budgeting-Second Edition, pp.60-67.. 8.. Billings, R.S., T.W. Milburn, and M.L. Schalman, 1980, A Model of Crisis Perception: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, pp.300-316.. 9.. Bozeman, B., and E. A. Slusher, 1979,'Scarcity and Environmental Stress in Public Organizations: A Conjectural Essay.' Administration and Society, 2, pp.335-355.. 10. Cameron, K.S., 1983. "Strategic Responses to Condition of Decline: Higher Education and the Private Sector." Journal of Higher Education, 54, pp.359-380. 11. Cameron, K.S., 1984, Organizational Adaptation and Higher Education, Journal of Higher Education, 55, pp.122-144. 12. Cameron, K.S., and R.F. Zammuto, 1984, Matching Managerial Strategies to Conditions of Decline, Human Resource Management, 22, pp.359-376. 13. Cameron, K.S., D.A. Whetten, and M. U. Kim, 1987, 'Organizational Dysfunctions of Decline', Academy of Management Journal, 30, pp.126-138. 14. Carmines, E.G., and R.A. Zeller, 1979, Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage Publications, Inc., Series/Number, pp.7-17. 15. Cheng, Y. T., and A.H. Ven, 1996.' Learning the Innovation Journey: Order Out of Chaos? 'Organization Science, 7, pp.593-614. 16. Corfield, D.B., 1983. "Chances of Layoff in a Corporration : A case Study." Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, pp.503-520. 17. Covaleski, M.A., and M. Dirsmith, 1988,' The Use of Budgetary Symbols in the Political Arena: A Historically Informed Field Study',Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13, pp. 1-24. 18. Damanpour, F., 1987, 'The Adoption of Technological, Administrative, and Ancillary Innovations: Impact of Organizational Factors.' Journal of Management, 13, pp.675-688. 19. Dunk A. S., 1989, Budget Emphasis, Participation and Managerial Performance: A Note, Accounting Organization and Society, 14, pp.321-324. 20. Eysenck, M.W., 1976, 'Arousal, Learning, and Memory.' Psychological Bulletin, 83, pp.389-404. 21. Ezzamel, M., and M. Bourn, 1990, The Roles of Accounting Information Systems in An Organization Experiencing Financial Crisis, Accounting Organizations and Society, 15, pp.399-424. 22. Ford, J.D., 1980, The Occurrence of Structural Hysteresis in Declinin g 29.

(67) Organizations, Academy of Management Review, 2, pp.561-575. 23. Freeman, J., and M.T. Hannan., 1975. "Growth and Decline Processes in Organizations." American Journal of Sociology, 40, pp.215-228. 24. Gimeno, J., T.B. Folta, A.C. Cooper, and C.Y. Woo, 1997, Survival of the Fittest? Entrepreneurial Human Capital and the Persistence of Underperforming Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp.750-783. 25. Greenhalgh, L., 1983. "Organizational Decline." In Research in the Sociology of Organization, 2, pp.231-276. 26. Greenhalgh, L., 1984, Organizational Decline as Maladaption to An Environment Niche, Symposium paper presented at the 1984 Annual Meeting of Management, August, Boston, U.S.A. 27. Haman, M.T., and J.H. Freeman, 1997, The Population Ecology of Organizations, American Journal of Sociology, 82, pp.929-946. 28. Hambrick, D.C., and Schecter, S.M., 1983, Turnaround Strategies for Mature Industrial-Product Business Units, Academy of Management Journal, 26. 29. Hambrick, D.C., and R.A. Daveni, 1988, Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spiral, Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, pp.1-23. 30. Hardy, C., 1987, Investing in Retrenchment: Avoiding the Hidden Costs, The Regents of the University of California. Reprinted from the California Management Review, 4. 31. Harrigan, K.R., 1982. "Exit Decision in Mature Industries." Academy of Management Joural, 25, pp.707-732. 32. Harrison, G.L., 1993, Reliance on Accounting Performance Mearsures in Superior Evaluative Style-The Influence of National Culture and Personality, Accounting Organizations Society, 18, pp.319-339. 33. Haveman, H.A., 1992, Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Organizational Change and Performance under Conditions of Fundamental Environmental Transformation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, pp.48-75. 34. Imoisili, O.A., 1989, The Role of Budget Data in Evaluation of Managerial Performance, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14, pp.325-335. 35. Jaccard, J., R. Turrisi and C.K. Wan, 1990, Internation Effects in Multiple Regression, CA: Sage. 36. Jick, T.D., and V.V. Murray, 1982, The Management of Hard Times: Budget Cutbacks in Public Sector Organizations, Organization Studies, 3, pp.141-170. 37. Kamin, J.Y., and J. Ronen, 1981, Effects of Budgetary Control Design on Management Decisions: Some Empirical Evidence, Decision Science, 12, 30.

(68) pp.471-485. 38. Kenis, I., 1979, Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitude and Performance, The Accounting Review, 54, pp.707-721. 39. Kinney, W.R., and L.S McDaniel, 1989, Characteristics of Firms Correcting Previously Reported Quarterly Earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11, pp.71-93. 40. Kolarska, L., and H. Aldrich, 1980. "Exit, Voice and Silence: Consumers' and Managers' Responses to Organizational Decline."Organization Studies, 1, pp.41-58. 41. Krantz, J., 1985, Group Processes Under Conditions of Organizational Decline, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, pp.1-17. 42. Levin, C.H., I.S. Rubin, and G.G. Wolohojian, 1981, Resource Scarcity and the Reform Model-The Management of Retrenchment in Cincinnati and Oakland, Public Administration Review, 41, pp.619-628. 43. Levine, C.H., 1985, ' Police Management in the 1980s : From Decrementalism to Strategic Thinking'. Administration Review. 44. Merchant, K.A., 1985, "Budgeting and Propensity to Greate Budgetary Slack," Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(2), pp.201-210. 45. Meyer, A.D., 1988, Organizational Decline from the Organization Perspective, In K. Cameron et al., (eds.), Organizational Decline: Frameworks, Research, and Prescription, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. 46. Meyer, M.W., 1975, Organizational Domains. American Sociological Review, 40, pp.599-615. 47. Miller, D., and P. Friesen, 1982a. 'A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle.' Working paper, Montreal: McGill University. 48. Mone, M.A., and W. Mckinley, 1988, The Groth of Decline: Research Streams in the Current Literature on Organizational Decline, Paper presented at the Decision Sciences Institute National Meeting, November 21-23, Las Vegas, Navada, U.S.A. 49. Mone, M.A., W. Mckinley and V.L. Barker, 1998, 'Organizational Decline and Innovation: A Contingency Framework'. Academy of Management Review, 23, pp.115-132. 50. Moore, C.E., 1980, 'The Manufacturing Budget.' Handbook of Budgeting-Second Edition, pp.229-230. 51. Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and G.A. Whitmore, 1992. Applied Statistics. Allyn and Bacon. 31.

(69) 52. Nunally, J.C., 1978, Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill:85. 53. Nystrom, P.C., and W.H. Starbuck, Crises,Unlearn'.Organizational Dynamics.. 1984,. 'To Avoid. Organizational. 54. Otley, D.T., 1978, Budget Use and Managerial Performance, Journal of Accounting Research, 16, pp.122-149. 55. Paige, G.D., 1972, 'Comparative Case Analysis of Crisis Decisions in Korea and Cuba.' In Charles Hermann, International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research, pp.39-55. 56. Perry, L.T., 1986, Least-Cost Alternative To Layoffs In Declining Industries, Organizational Dynamics, American Management Association, New York. 57. Pfeffer, J., and G.R. Salancik, 1974, The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of A University, Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, pp.453-473. 58. Porter, M.E., 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press. 59. Rice, A.K., 1965. Larning for Leadership. London: Tavistock. 60. Rubin, I., 1977, Universities in Stress: Decision Making Under Conditions of Reduced Resources, Social Science Quarterly, 58, pp.242-254. 61. Schendel, D.E., G.R. Patton, and J. Ringgs, 1976. "Corporate Turnaround Strategies: A Study of Profit Decline and Recovery." Journal of General Management, 3, pp.3-11. 62. Schwartz, H.W., 1980, 'Budgeting and the Managerial Process.' Handbook of Budgeting-Second Edition, pp.2-20. 63. Schwartz, R.M., 1982, 'Sales and Budgeting-Second Edition, pp.205-223.. Marketing. Budget.'. Handbook. of. 64. Singh, J.V., 1986, Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making, Academy of Management Journal, 29, pp.562-585. 65. Singhvi, S.S., 1979, 'The Capital Investment Budgeting Process.' Handbook of Budgeting-Second Edition, pp.347-242. 66. Staw, B.M., L.E. Sandelands, and J.E. Dutton, 1981, Threat-rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, pp.501-524. 67. Stice, J.D., 1991, Using Financial and Market Information to Identify Pre-Engagement Factors Associated with Lawsuits Against Auditors, The Accounting Review, 66, pp.516-533. 68. Sutton, R.I., 1983, Managing Management, 22.. Organizational. 32. Death, Human. Resource.

(70) 69. Sutton, R.L., and A. Callahan, 1987, The Stigma of Bankruptcy: Spoiled Organizational Image and Its Management, Academy of Management Journal, 30, pp.405-436. 70. Thompson, A.A., and Strickland, A.M., 1980. Strategy Formulation and Implementation. Dallas: Business Publications, Inc. 71. Turner, B.A., 1976, 'The Organizational and Interorganizational Development of Disasters.' Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, pp.378-397. 72. Weggeland, R.L., and Knapp, M.M., 1981,'Applying The Budget System.' Handbook of Budgeting-Second Edition, pp.521-530. 73. Whetten, D.A., 1980, 'Organizational Decline: Antecedents and Consequencces.' In J. Kimberly and R. H. Miles, Organizational Life Cycles, pp342-374. 74. Whetten, D.A., 1980a. "Organization Decline: Neglected Topic in Organization Science." Academy of Management Review, 4, pp.577-588. 75. Wilson, E., 1980. Socio-Biology. Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press. 76. Zammuto, R.F., 1984, On the Desirralility of Organizational Decline, Paper Presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August, Boston, U. S. A. 77. Zammuto, R.F., 1985, Managing Decline: Lessons From the U.S. Auto Industry, Administration & Society, 17, pp.71-95. 78. Zammuto, R.F., and K.S. Cameron, 1983. "Matching Managerial Strategies to Conditions of Decline." Human Resource Management, 22, pp.117-128. 79. Zammuto, R.F., and K.S. Cameron, 1985, Environmental Decline and Organizational Response, In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cumings(eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, pp.223-262.. 33.

(71)

參考文獻

相關文件

An Empirical Study of the Influences of Emotional Intelligence, Sex Discrimination, Change Leadership and LMX on Female Leadership Effectiveness.. 研 究

The min-max and the max-min k-split problem are defined similarly except that the objectives are to minimize the maximum subgraph, and to maximize the minimum subgraph respectively..

Type case as pattern matching on values Type safe dynamic value (existential types).. How can we

Experiment a little with the Hello program. It will say that it has no clue what you mean by ouch. The exact wording of the error message is dependent on the compiler, but it might

This study first explores the legal cases on the definition of wage from different agents, including administrative authorities, judicial authorities, and academic organizations..

The Performance Evaluation for Horizontal, Vertical and Hybrid Schema in Database Systems.. -A Case Study of Wireless Broadband

The present study explores the relationship between organizational reward system, job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and organizational performance to

Lin-ya Hong (2009), “Effects of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems Adoption on Production Performance in Manufacturing Industry -- using A Multinational Plastic