• 沒有找到結果。

Comment on "discrete-time optimal fuzzy controller design: Global concept approach" - Reply

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Comment on "discrete-time optimal fuzzy controller design: Global concept approach" - Reply"

Copied!
1
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

286 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL. 13, NO. 2, APRIL 2005

III. A COUNTEREXAMPLE

Since the case in [1] is also presented and discussed for continuous systems in [2], we give a continuous system case to illustrate that the trajectories are different for finite-horizon and infinite-horizon opti-mization problem.

Consider the linear time-invariant linear system defined as follows: _x(t) = 0x(t) + u(t):

The costindex is defined as

J = 0:5x(T ) + 0:5 T

0 [x

2(t) + u2(t)] dt:

The optimal control law is

u(t) = 0p(t)x(t)

wherep(t) is the solution of the following Riccati equation: _p(t) = 2p(t) + p2(t) 0 1 p(T ) = 1 : Then p(t) = ( p 2 0 1)(2 +p2) + (p2 + 1)(2 0p2)e2p2(t0T ) (2 + 2) 0 (2 0p2)e2p2(t0T ) : WhenT ! 1 lim T !1p(t) = 0:414:

The optimal trajectory is

x(t) = x(0) exp t

0 [01 0 p()] d:

It is obvious that the two trajectories, finite-horizon optimal trajec-tory in time interval[0; T] and infinite-horizon optimal trajectory in time interval[0; T], are different.

IV. CONCLUSION

References [1] and [2] present some helpful researches in the optimal controller design for the fuzzy system. However, there are some issues, such as how to simplify the computation for the optimization problem of fuzzy system and how to ensure some characteristics of the closed-loop system, that need to be resolved.

REFERENCES

[1] S.-J. Wu and C.-T. Lin, “Discrete-time optimal fuzzy controller design: Global conceptapproach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21–38, Feb. 2002.

[2] , “Optimal fuzzy controller design in continuous fuzzy system: Global conceptapproach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 713–728, Dec. 2000.

Authors’ Reply S. J. Wu and C. T. Lin

We would like to thank Drs. Song and Chai for their comments. The papers mentioned are based on the idea that the optimal decision is, in fact, a step-by-step on-going decision process. In other words, at any time state, sayingXi(k), the following two decisions are to be made. 1) Minimize J1(R(1)) = 1 k=k [Xt(k)L(k)X(k) + Rt (k)Wt(Y (k))W(Y (k))R(k)]

regarding nonlinear system

X(k + 1) =H(X(k))A(k)X(k) + H(X(k))B(k)W(Y (k))R(k) Y (k) =C(k)X(k): 2) Minimize Ji 1(R(1)) = 1 k=k [Xt(k)LX(k) + Rt(k)Wt iWiR(k)]

regarding linear system

X(k + 1) =HiAX(k) + HiBWiR(k)

Y (k) =CX(k):

With the aid of the dynamic decomposition algorithm (DDA), the non-linear system behavior can be captured by the non-linear system for all k 2 [ki

0; ki1 0 1] and for all i = 1; . . . ; N. We then know these

two decisions are the same for allk 2 [ki0; ki10 1]. Hence, we have X3

1(k) = X1i3(k). We can now imagine the original optimal

trajec-tory as just being composed of linked segments, which are the starting sections of segmental infinite trajectoriesX1i3(k) for i = 1; . . . ; N. If each segmental infinite trajectory is uniformly exponential stable, i.e.,

9 q < 1 s:t: kXi

1(k)k < q 8 k  k0i

8  > 0; 9 an integer T () > 0 s:t: kXi

1(k)k  

8 k  T ()

then the original optimal trajectory is guaranteed to be exponentially stable.

This work is inferred from backward reasoning but written in a for-ward sense. Lemma 3 is used to connectX1i (k) to Xi (k). However, we lost one condition in Lemma 3:X(ki1) is free by equal in these two optimal issues, i.e., X3(k1i) = X3(k1i). This condition can compen-sate the defect in Lemma 3 and, hence, cancel out the misleading switch phenomena. For readability considerations, this paper is written not only in a forward-inference way, but also not to emphasize thatXi (k) is in fact from the starting section ofX1i (k) for the infinite-horizon issue orX[k ;k 01]i (k), finite-horizon issue.

This work is correct in stability analysis and the infinite-horizon so-lution is optimal positively. However, the finite-horizon soso-lution can be called suboptimal or near-optimal in large sense to denote the less op-timality of the last few segments.

Manuscriptreceived March 26, 2003; revised March 1, 2004.

The authors are with the Department of Electrical and Control Engineering, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan, R.O.C. (e-mail: [email protected]).

Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TFUZZ.2004.839664 1063-6706/$20.00 © 2005 IEEE

參考文獻

相關文件

The fuzzy model, adjustable with time, is first used to consider influence factors with different features such as macroeconomic factors, stock and futures technical indicators..

This research is to integrate PID type fuzzy controller with the Dynamic Sliding Mode Control (DSMC) to make the system more robust to the dead-band as well as the hysteresis

Wang, and Chun Hu (2005), “Analytic Hierarchy Process With Fuzzy Scoring in Evaluating Multidisciplinary R&amp;D Projects in China”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering management,

Keywords:Balanced scorecard (BSC), Collaborative design, Performance evaluation, Fuzzy Delphi, Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)... 誌

Then, these proposed control systems(fuzzy control and fuzzy sliding-mode control) are implemented on an Altera Cyclone III EP3C16 FPGA device.. Finally, the experimental results

Generally, the declared traffic parameters are peak bit rate ( PBR), mean bit rate (MBR), and peak bit rate duration (PBRD), but the fuzzy logic based CAC we proposed only need

The neural controller using an asymmetric self-organizing fuzzy neural network (ASOFNN) is designed to mimic an ideal controller, and the robust controller is designed to

Dragan , “Provably good global buffering using an available buffer block plan”, IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, pp.. Cong, “Interconnect performance