• 沒有找到結果。

知識管理績效之實證研究

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "知識管理績效之實證研究"

Copied!
13
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫 成果報告

知識管理績效之實證研究

計畫類別: 個別型計畫 計畫編號: NSC94-2416-H-006-015- 執行期間: 94 年 08 月 01 日至 95 年 07 月 31 日 執行單位: 國立成功大學工業與資訊管理學系(所) 計畫主持人: 耿伯文 計畫參與人員: 陳彥芬 林建旭 報告類型: 精簡報告 處理方式: 本計畫可公開查詢

中 華 民 國 95 年 10 月 27 日

(2)

 

 

 

 



 



























































































An Empirical Study of Knowledge Management Performance







  







NSC94          









        

     !  

"

#

$

%

&

'



(

)

"

#

$



*

+

$

,

-

.

/



0

1

2





3

4

5

6



78

9

:

;

<

=

>

?

<

@

A

BC

D

5

6

E

5

6





F

3

4

5

6

G

H

I

J

K

@

A

L

M

N



O

PQ

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

5

6

Y

Z



O

[

\

]

^

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

5

6

Y

Z



R

_

P`

a

b

c

d

W

X

5

6

e

f

g

L

h

'

i

Y

Z



P`

j

U

k

PQ

U

k

5

6

l

Y

Z



m

n

o

p q r

a

j

U

k

st u

r

v

w

b

e

$

x

y

z

U

k

s{

|

e

J

{

}

~



Q

€X



‚

ƒ

„

…

†



‡

e

ˆ

‰

T

Š

‹

Œ



Ž

r



€Y



’

ƒ

„

…

†









>

“

P

3

”

[

a

•

v

+

–

—

|

n

a

˜





™š›P          

(3)



                        ! "  # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - * . /0  1 2 3 4  5 6 ) * 7 8 9 : ; < = > ?@ A B C % D E  F F G H I J KL  M N G HO P Q R S ) *  . /TUV M W  X Y ?Z[  \ ] ^M _  R ` a b cd e f b g h ) *   i j kl m n ( o N p q r s h ) * 9 W   t m G Hu v KS w x y z  { F | } ~ N w  ` € T . /T‚ ƒ „ … ?† ‡ ˆ‰Š ‹ Œ  h    9 W & ' Ž   ‘ ’ “ ” B • –F G HS —  ˜ ™   w š ) *  › % u v G Hh œ  W R ž Ÿ ?d e c  ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ T§¨ r © Tª « r © ?¬ ¤ ­ ® X Y ˆ¥ ¦ ¯ „  W  ° ± ² r © S s h ) *  . /TUV M W  X Y ?Z[  \ ] h   i j kl ‹  W ³ ´ d e ( m µ ¶ ·  u v G H) *  . /UV M W  X Y Z[  \ ] w š ) *

(4)

Abstract

In order to follow the knowledge-based economy in this decade, the knowledge management becomes not only an important process for the organization growth, but also a substantial issue for recent management study. However, it is still difficult for firms to survive in such competitive environment, this study, therefore, bases on the framework of business environment, leader’s behavior, and employee’s cognition, according to the conclusions of previous studies to investigate the impacts on the enterprises’ performance from knowledge management.

In view of relative studies, which aimed at the enterprises, which practice knowledge management, foreign companies are mostly chosen for the samples, however, different factors, such as national culture, geographical environment and so on, may as well influence the process of knowledge management practice. Thus, this study focuses in seven domestic companies, which have practiced knowledge management, to conduct such empirical study. Furthermore, many statistic methods are utilized to perform rigorous analysis.

                                           

Key words: Knowledge management, survey research, business environment leader’s behavior, employee’s cognition, domestic company

           

(5)

    ) * + , - * . /0  1 2 3 4  5 6 ) * 7 8 9 : ; < = > ?@ A B C % D E  F F G HI J KL  M N G HO P Q R S ) *  . /TUV M W  X Y ?Z[  \ ] ^M _  R ` a b cd e f b g h ) *   i j kl m n (“ o N    9 W & ' Ž  ‘ ’ “ ” B • –F G HS —  ˜ ™   w š ) *  ›% u v G Hh œ  W R ž Ÿ ?d e c   ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ T§¨ r © Tª « r © ?¬ ¤ ­ ® X Y ˆ¥ ¦ ¯ „  W  ° ± ² r © S s h ) *  . /TUV M W  X Y ?Z[  \ ] h   i j kl ‹  W ³ ´ d e (¸     ¸¸¸¸F G H¹ º» ¡ K;  r © ¼ ½ 9 ¾ ¿ À d e   ·¸ Ts h   T] R T! "  \ TUV R x w Á  ` à Ä Å ¿  Æ t m q r Ç È & S É Ê  ¼ ½ u v G H„ Ësurvey research̝ W ˜ Í ž Ÿ S Î ÏR ?- * Ð Ñ W t Ò ' Ó (¸ ÔTd e - * Ð 9 :   ˜ Í 3 4 ?Õ Ö × Ø S ³ ´ Î ÏÙ Ú Û¿ kl   9 : . /‰Š TUV M W  X Y T [  \ ] Ü  i j ˆt m $ % b g ËconstructÌ(¸ ^T  i j Ý Þ ß à á⠉ã( ä ` à Kå æ ç N   è : F é ƒ ê ë ì T! "  \ ?± í î ï Q ð R h à  ‰d e ñ ò (F G Hó ¹ Û ô   . /‰Š TUV M W  X Y T [  \ ] Ü  i j ˆt m $ % b g cÕ Ö õ  ËpropositionÌc  ¡ ¥ ¦ r © ¼ ½ d e h  i j kl m n ËrelationÌ(¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸          

(6)

 

          

WiigË1999Ìö ¿     ÷ “ j W  Ëeffective behaviorÌø C ù ä “ j W  ú û ) * š q . / ü K‰Š ý þ Z[ ½  ’ TZ   5 • ô _ T  ‚ ƒ T) * ¥ “ j ¤ ˆ( M G t m U  ` à Kh N ) * š q 9 :    š q . / „      ËHolsapple and Joshi, 2000ÌF G H  Ú Ûþ · 2-1  . /t m ` à     !!!! """" #### $$$$ Nonaka (1991)  ¿ á  Q ! " ã    (knowledge-base)T  ¥  (project system)T) * ¥  (business system) ) *  . / ~ F ^ a b

Nonaka and KonnoË1998Ì

 ¿  ô    B •  t h Ý !  " Ëoriginating BaÌT# $ "

Ëinteracting BaÌT% & " Ëcyber BaÌT ' ( " Ëexercising BäB • ) *  . /

GreengardË1998Ì ]  á+ , - ÷ ’ . / ㈗ % 0    B ‘ 1 2 š q ‰3

Davenport, Long and BeerË1998Ì

h ^4 ˜ ™       W G H5 ¦ ® 6 ¿ á7 8  ` € ã ËKnowledge-Friendly Culturë9 4  ÷ m µ : ¤

Hansen, Norhria and TierneyË1999Ì

I  ¤ ; Œ  ‘ < ê ª r  áQ b € ã ËcodificationÌá4 Z€ ãËpersonalizationÌ = * B • > ? 9 : X Y ± ² @ A ·F G HÛ % %%

% &&&& '''' ( ( ( ( )))) **** ++++    

(7)

 G H I TJ K T ¥ L Q b ˆ¯ Y M € ! "  N  ) * + , O Ø ‰PU V M W  X Y ß  $ ' d Q Æ R  $ % ä ß UV R S Æ # T U ?M V U UV R š W X ‘ Y Z [ ZÎ Ïkl   9 :  j ~ \ (UV Z ]^ ^ ‰ G HM ›ë ] S Ü ‡ /Œ  ä “ ” B • ËYukl , 1981Ì(‰ PS 2-3ÛYuklË1981̔ À _ ½ “  ¤ ` ÏS Ü à a t m  M ` Ã Ñ W Ûô d e · 2-3 UV Z ]t m ` à   

 ,,,, ---- &&&& '''' .... ////

Jacobs 1970 UV ø áZ  b : à Æ ZS c * ¯ Y  d c * ± í e f Z³ g h I i à ö j k ‘ l m n o Q ð (ã Stogdill 1974 UV ø áß . p  [ Á q b : & ' Æ r  H I cF S  + ! " Q b cs t (ã Katz and Kahn

1978 UV ø áß ! " ý W ö ¾ u v Y w x ‹ k l y z  (ã

Rauch and Behling

1984 UV ø á! " . p  d  { Z | } T ~ U V M kl ! " è : & ' (ã

Kotter 1990 UV ø á Z ; < ¯ € TÛô ?J K ¨ [ ã

Heifetz and Laurie 1997

UV ø ၠ ‚ ‚ Õ ƒ ä  ò „ Z … † 1 ‡ ` ˆ à Æ ú ‰ Š ë ‹ T ] Œ  Tu Û; < B Ž Ts t “    ‘ T’ ‚ N † ?“ ” ~  • – ˆW  ã

± ² @ A ·Yukl, G.Ë1981Ì.Leadership in organizations. Nj : Prentice- Hall. —˜  ™ Ë2000Ì&&&& '''' 0š000 › ·œ  ` ™ ž Henry MintzbergˆË2000Ì.

1  11  1  2222  3333 #4#4#4#4 5555 6666 7777 3333 ####    ] R Ÿ A Ý ¡ N ?  U   ¡  “ KL  M  ¿ B • R ?` Ï2-4À j ` à t m R £ (Û¢  þ · 2-4 ] R t m ` à     !!!! """" #### $$$$

(8)

                  ! " # $ % & ' AjzenË1991Ì 4 Z]  ž £ ½ “ Ñ W ’ y 1 ¤ “ Ñ W t m ± A ¥ K ¦ h Ñ W § 0 W  ¨ © ] ª ¥ « ( —¬  Ë1997Ì k Z­  4  \ ?]  ¥ ® á]  ƒ ê ¥ ãˆ) 4 ›% q r ϯ ] ? \ & ' ( Richardson(1998) ] R ® ° ± ² œ ³ T´ µ T+ b T¶ ª L Š ô · * ] Õ Ö X Y ( ± ² @ A ·F G HÛ 8 88 8   9999 3333 :::: ;;;; <<<< ====     # ¸ S @ i j ¹ ø G H! " W  $ % I J B  ø UV X Y T[ ¼ J K 1 ) * ; < à º » | ¼ ø %  ½ ! " i j (   9 : & ' Æ ! " C ù B ¾ ¿ ‘ Zy TÀ y ?   F à Á ›% |  ß N   ! " Ûp i j Ëú ‰ š à ?x  Ì 3 ËMitri , 2003ÄOstro, 1997ÌT1  : ! "  M Å ?º Æ ˜ Í + b ËAllerton, 1998Ì(‰PÕ Ö   ’ Ç d m ) * ›È Á j É ø è : ’ Ç Ê t Ë ¤ Ì t $ % ‰Š ËHeeseok and Byounggu , 2003Ì(| â  Í  Î Ï! " 9 W    3 4 ? j  ®  * G Hu b 1  M  ¿ „ * Î Ï  s h F G Ha b ” Ð r £ Ô* ›% Î  ¼ ½ þ · 2-6   i j Î  ö } t m ` à > ? >> ?? > ?   9999 3333 :::: ;;;; <<<< ==== @@@@ AAAA Arthur Andersen ? American

Productivity and Quality CenterË2000Ì

± ² ' Ñ TUV T) * ` € T± í î ï T i j Ž Î ˆ5 ¦ Ô) 0 ˜ Í « Ó É 0 Bukowitz and Williams Ë1999Ì S  $ '  ~ \  6 ´ Å l Te ¡

 \ TÒ Ã TÎ  T+ , ?s ” S Ü Ó Ô ˆ— p q r 5 ¦ ) O0 ˜ Í « Ó É 0     B BB B  CCCC DDDD 

(9)

¸¸¸¸F G H W Õ ø   ¡ u v G H„ Ësurvey research̝ W t m ` Ã Ö §TG × ?ÛÄÇ & ö V Ø Ù TÚ Û Ü G Hƒ ?  ˜ Í   e R  & Z F Ý @ Æ d e É Ê š W  ¦ Ü ˜ Ÿ ¯ „ (¸      EEEE FFFF  ¸¸¸¸F G H›% ø d e ) *  . /TUV M X Y ?Z[  \ ] h N   ¸ i j m ´ ¤ (Þ J ` à d e ” ® 6 ¿ Q ð + , þ º ßàá ” j R a b ( ºÆ  j F G Ha b ›% ú ‰ “ ) p b g ËconstructÌ·) *  . /TUV M X Y TZ[  \ ] ?  i j (¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ % % % %  GGGG HHHH 4444 IIII JJJJ  ¸¸¸¸F @ Þ J G H| ?` à ” 9 C G Ha b + , G Hõ  ?â  (r « S ) *  . /TUV M W  X Y T [  \ ] ?! " i j  G Hb g ® ` à 9 V f b g  m n + b — p õ  ?t m â  (¸

¸G HGGG HHH KKKK  LLLL MMMM      NNNN &&&& '''' ( ( ( ( )))) **** ++++ OOOO PPPP QQQQ  RRRR SSSS  

 

G HGGG HHH %K%%%KK&K&&& ''''     (((( )))) **** ++++ NNNN TTTT UUUU 7777 2222  OOOO PPPP QQQQ RRRR SSSS  G H 1 G H 1 G H 1 G H 1 KKKK  LLLL MMMM      NNNN TTTT UUUU 7777 2222  OOOO PPPP QQQQ  RRRR SSSS ¸ G H 8 G H 8 G H 8

G H 8KKKK&&&& '''' ( ( ( ( )))) **** ++++ NNNN   9999 3333  VVVV WWWW :::: ;;;; OOOO PPPP QQQQ  RRRR SSSS     G HGGG HHH XXXX KKTKKTTT UUUU 7777 2222  NNNN   9999 3333  VVVV WWWW :::: ;;;; OOOO PPPP QQQQ  RRRR SSSS  G H Y G H Y G H Y G H Y KKKK  LLLL MMMM      NNNN   9999 3333  VVVV WWWW :::: ;;;; OOOO PPPP QQQQ  RRRR SSSS  G H Z G H Z G H Z

G H Z KKKK   LLLL MMMM       & '&&& ''' ( ( ( ( )))) **** ++ ++ T UTTT UUU 7777 2222  NNNN   9999 3333  VVVV     WWWW :::: ;;;; [[[[ OOOO PPPP QQQQ  RRRR SSSS      1  11  1 \\\\ ]]]] CCCC DDDD 4444 ^^^^ ____   Z[  \ ]  ) *  . /   i j º ßàḸ< g ¤ G Ha b ¸

(10)

   \\\\ ]]]] CCCC DDDD  ËÌG Hh œ ¸ ¸¸¸¸F G H›% G Hh œ ø w š 9 :    ) * (ã ø 9 :   t ¸ m è : ” ’ - ƒ  i j c ä ‘ Ü ‰PG H) * h œ 9 :   ˜ ¸ Í å ¦   B æ & ç (Þ J S ‹ Ž  S Ñ W d è S ‹ é ê  G Hh œ (¸ ËÔÌë { ì a ?{ F @ A ¸ ¸¸¸¸F G HS w š | â x ˆ   t m è : ! "  [  í p ã ® N w š 9 :     î ) * ï ð B T ñ ò –| } q ¼ * ‹ á- *   ï ó ô V ?9  ãõ ö Ëhttp://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/kmppÌÅ l ÷ ø ø ß   } ù ) * ï ú ?Æ w ƒ - y y z ¿ û áü Z  9 : ˜ Í ãý _  Ž  X Y ™ þ é ê ï ð à Æ S » ë { ¯ Y | }```` aaaa bbbb cccc '''' dddd Teeee ffff gggg h h h hTi jiii jjj gggg Tk lkkk lll cccc '''' dddd Tm nmmm nnn gggg hhhhTo pooo ppp qqqq rrrr ?ssss tttt uuuu cccc '''' dddd vvvv wwww ˆ—  Ò ô  î ï - * Z ]ËW ‚  +   [ ª ÷ ø ø áÌé ê [ ¼   Z ë { ì a Ësampling frameÌ(¸ Ë^ÌG H| r ° ¸ ¸¸¸¸F G Hº ›% | ß N  ?ž Ÿ F ® ` à   ” + , õ  ?; 0   ‰L ð m n –‘ Z L  ‰ð ¤ G H_  (¸    8888qqqq xxxx yyyy zzzz CCCC DDDD  ¸¸¸¸¥ ¦ ¯ „ ‘ S F ®  p í p Æ ë { { F r © Q ð   ¿ ” d e Q ð  ä l m n    ˆ ˜ £ ËChauvel and Despres , 2002Ì(ß Pa b Ž  F G HŽ  ¥ ¦ r © ¼ ½ ’ “ j ö ¿ ; „  t m  ¤ – Z   ¡ SPSS 10.0 for Windows W ± ² ¥ ¦ ¼ _ t m ± ² r © ¯ „ þ ¸ TËDescriptive statisticsÌ

ÔT{|4;|yz{|4;|yz{|4;|yz{|4;|yzËreliability and validity̸ 1

1 1

1}}}} ~~~~  jjjj €€€€ !!!! """" DDDD Pearson product-moment correlation )T ‚‚‚‚ yzyzyzyzËCluster analysis̸

·Tƒƒƒƒ „„„„ yzyzyzyzËDiscriminate analysisÌ

T………… †††† ‡‡‡‡ ˆˆˆˆ yzyzyzyz(Linearity regression analysis)¸ ‰

‰‰

‰ŠŠŠŠ #### 4‹4‹4‹4‹ ŒŒŒŒ 

F GH Õ S w š —  ˜ W     ) *  [  { F r « d e á) *  . / ãTáU V M W  X Y ãTá [  \ ]  ã ^4    ‡ / ; „ 

(11)

há   ˜ ™ i j ã k lm n (F Ý  GH  Q ú ‰ GH M s hF GH ”  ¿  Q R TGH  © Tƒ ê  ± ?  @ GH +  ˆš W (¸      ŠŠŠŠ ####    

&&&& '''' (((( )))) **** ++++ 4T4T4T4T UUUU  7777 2222    9999 3333 VVVV WWWW :::: ;;;; FFFF ŽŽŽŽ  RRRR SSSS """"   ËÌU V M W  X Y ? Z [  \ ]   k lm n ¸ ® GH Q ð ‘  U V M W  X Y  ˜ hZ [  \ ]  - ƒ   k lP q  ? p q r ]  ?   ‹  ë ì t • (¸ ËÔÌU V M W  X Y ?    ˜ ™ i j  k lm n ¸ U V M W  X Y h   ˜ ™ i j ¹  k l‹ # T U U V ' Ó   ¸ hN    9 : i j ‹  “   6 ä M V U U V h   i j ¹  k l B  f x GH M ]  # T U U V M hN    i j ‹ ¹  k lñ M V U U V M  GH Q ð ~ w š ) * ä  ø ‘   Ê (¸ ¸ % % % %TTTT UUUU  7777 2222  4444  9999 3333 VVVV WWWW :::: ;;;; RRRR SSSS """"   ¸¸¸¸® GH Q ð  j Z [  \ ]  h   ˜ ™ i j ¹  k l‹ - ƒ   X € k lP q  ? p q r ]  ?   ` à ‹  ë ì t • (¸ 1 1 1

1   LLLL MMMM      NNNN &&&& '''' (((( )))) **** + +++ T UTTT UUU  7777 2222      9999 3333 VVVV WWWW :::: ;;;;  F Ž  R S "   F Ž  R S "   F Ž  R S "   F Ž  R S "   ËÌ) * š q   . / hU V M W  X Y  k lm n ¸ ¸¸¸¸P = b g  ¹  m n r © Q ð Ô S  p + b - ÷ ’   $ ' 0 hM V U U V M W  c  m n  x à f r © Q ð !  j . / " ;  ˜ hN U V M U V W  - ƒ t S ' Ó k l( ËÔÌ) * š q   . / hZ [  \ ]   k lm n ¸ ¸¸¸¸I J r © Q ð # 3 P = b g  ¹  m n Ô S  p + b - ÷ ’   $ '  0 hZ [  \ ]  c  m n  x à f r © Q ð !  j . / " ;  ˜ h N Z [  \ ]  - ƒ t S ' Ó k l(¸ Ë^Ì) * š q   . / h   ˜ ™ i j ˆb g  k lm n ¸ ¸¸¸¸® GH Q ð  j F GH ® ` à ” ® 6 ·0    9 : & ' Æ  $ %  . / ‰ Š h   ˜ ™ i j ¹  k l‹   ½ “ X €   k l(‰ P ? K „     t m ` à Q R t • (¸ 8 8 8

8   LLLL MMMM       & '&&& ''' (((( )))) **** + +++ T UTTT UUU  7777 2222  NNNN   9999 3333  VVVV WWWW :::: ; R S " 

; R S "  ; R S "  ; R S "  

(12)

   ® GH a b  W Û p X Y Ž  Õ 3  R U V M W  $ € # T U 1 U V U  !  „ h   i j - ƒ   k l%   ›  1 ± ³   M Ì t ?  r & ` € = 0 . / ‰ Š hN    i j k l B  P Q ð ?  . / h  i j  ¹  m n r © # 3 cB Ò ô (¸ ¸    %%%% ‘‘‘‘ CCCC ’’’’ ‹‹‹‹ ŒŒŒŒ  F GH  GH |  d  hN Ù Ë t m GH ' (  À ) ì +  S * + Ž ·¸ ËÌ, - a b ·¸ ¸¸¸¸® N    . /  p k l    i j ‰ Š n ø 0 S _ 1 û ã h ¸ ’ Ç + Ž n K t m  R ` à cz 2 Ê þ é ê Ý ‘ Û ô ¿ 4 n ½ ˜ Í + Ž G¸ H 3 4  a b (¸ ËÔÌ{ F @ A ·¸ ¸¸¸¸F GH { F  @ A › %  q ¼ * ‹ á- *    ï ó ô V ? 9  ãõ öËhttp://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/kmppÌÅ l  ÷ ø ø ß     } ù ) * ï ú ? Æ w ƒ - y y z ¿ û á  ü Z    9 : ˜ Í ãý _  Ž  ™ þ  é ê ï ð  & w š ˜  9 :    è :  ) * B å N P h ’ 5 p ë { . / c   ¡ k “ 6 N Î Ï    ˜ Í E _   6 (¸ Ë^Ì- * ª « ·¸ ¸¸¸¸F GH ~ N  » ë {  Ž  å S  î ï - *  GH hœ h Ù Ë GH M ’ ¸ S - - * r ©  D Ó s hB • - *  W u v ¦ ‘ F ® ˜ Ÿ k F GH  a b 7 ¸ w š f - * N 9 : ‹  Œ  ¤ (¸     “ ”   ““ ””   “ ”   8Æ ` q r 9 á : ; < = Ë÷ ø ø ÷ Ì> ? ± F @ R ? ˜ Í š Æ ·A B (¸ ÷ : — ¬  Ëá C C D Ì]  ?   ¸ R ? ˜ E F ß ûš › ·G H (¸ ß: — ˜  ™ Ë÷ ø ø ø ÌU V š › ·œ   ` ™ ž I J K L M ¸N O K P Q R J L S ˆ(¸ 8T` q r 9¸

1. Allerton, H.E. 1998. News you can use. Training & Development, 522, 9-10. 2. Ajzen, I. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and

Human Decision Processes , 502, 179 -212.

3. Bryant, S.E. 2003. The role of transformational and transactional leadership in creating, sharing and exploiting organizational knowledge. Journal of Leadership

(13)

& Organizational Studies, 94, 32.

4. Bukowitz R. W. and R. L. Williams 1999. The knowledge management fieldbook. Lodon: Prentice Hall.

5. Chauvel, D. and C. Despres 2002. A review of survey research in knowledge management 1997-2001. Journal of Knowledge Management, 63, 207-223. 6. Ching, C. L. and J. Yang 2000. Knowledge value chain. The Journal of

Management Development. 199/10, 783-794.

7. Conger, J.A. 1999. Charismatic and transformational leadership in

organizations: An insider's perspective on these developing streams of research.

Leadership Quarterly, 102,145 199/10, 783-794.

8. Davenport, T. H., D. W. D Long and M. C. Beers1998. Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39 2, 43-58.

9. DeCarolis, D. M. and D. L. Deeds 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of

organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 953.

10. Greengard, S. 1998. How to make KM a reality? Workforce , 7710, 90-91. 11. Hansen, M. T. 1999. What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? Harvard

Business Review, 772, 106-116.

12. Heeseok, L., C. Byounggu 2003. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination.

Journal of Management Information Systems. 201, 179.

13. Holsapple, C. W., K. D. Joshi 2000. An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Strategic Information Systems , 92, 235-261.

14. Knapp, E. M. 1998. Knowledge management. Business and Economic Review, 444, 3-4.

15. Mitri, M.2003. Applying tacit knowledge management techniques for performance assessment. Computers and Education, 412, 173-189 16. Nonaka, I. 1991. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business

Review,696, 96-104.

17. Nonaka, I. and N. Konno 1998. The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California management review, 403, 40-54.

18. Ostro, N. 1997. The corporate brain. Chief Executive, 123, 58-62. 19. Venkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam 1986. Measurement of Business,

Performance in Strategy Research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 114, 801- 815.

20. Wiig, K. M 1999. What future knowledge management users may expect?

Journal of Knowledge Management, 32, 155.

參考文獻

相關文件

At the basic education level, students learn through three domains: visual arts appreciation and criticism, visual arts making and visual arts knowledge which are integrated

Students are asked to collect information (including materials from books, pamphlet from Environmental Protection Department...etc.) of the possible effects of pollution on our

The difference resulted from the co- existence of two kinds of words in Buddhist scriptures a foreign words in which di- syllabic words are dominant, and most of them are the

“Water control and useful knowledge: river management and the evolution of knowledge in China, Northern Italy and the Netherlands.” Paper presented at the Global Economic

Binding Warning message Binding Update message AAAO: the AAA server of the old foreign network to which the OFA belongs. AAAF: the AAA server of the new foreign network to which the

• Environmental Report 2020 of Transport Department, Hong Kong: to provide a transport system in an environmentally acceptable manner to align with the sustainable development of

• develop students’ metacognitive skills (e.g. knowledge management skills), which are essential for future studies or work and lifelong learning, by allowing them to take charge

● the F&amp;B department will inform the security in advance if large-scaled conferences or banqueting events are to be held in the property.. Relationship Between Food and