一、中文部分
林淑雅、劉后安譯，Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board，收於司法院編，
「美國聯邦最高法院憲法判決選譯」(第四輯)，台北：司法院，2003 年，頁 185-193。
范慈容、劉后安譯，Bush v. Gore，收於司法院編，「美國聯邦最高法院憲法判決 選譯」(第四輯)，台北：司法院，2003 年，頁 200-249。
黃昭元(2004)，憲法權利限制的司法審查標準：美國類型化多元標準模式的比較 分析，「台大法學論叢」，卷 33，期 3，頁 45-148。
薛 波主編(2003)，「元照英美法詞典」，北京：法律出版社。
二、英文部分
Abramowicz, Michael and Maxwell L. Stearns (2001), Beyond Counting Votes: The
Political Economy of Bush v. Gore, 54 Vanderbilt Law Review 1849-1952.
Ackerman, Bruce (2002),“
Off Balance,
”in Bruce Ackerman (ed.),Bush v.Gore-The Question of Legitimacy, New Heaven: Yale University Press, 192-209.Ackerman, Bruce (2001),“
Anatomy of a Constitutional Coup,”
in ArthurJ.Jacobson and Michel Rosenfeld(eds.), The Longest Night-Polemics and Perspectives on Election 2000, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 227-235.Althouse, Ann (2002), The Authoritative Lawsaying Power of the State Supreme
Court and the United States Supreme Court：Conflicts of Judicial Orthodoxy in the Bush-Gore Litigation , 61 Maryland Law Review 508-575.
Balkin, Jack M. (2001), Bush v. Gore and the Boundary between Law and Politics, 110 The Yale Law Journal 1407-1458.
Balkin, Jack M. and Sanford Levinson (2001), Understanding the Constitutional
Revolution, 87 Virginia Law Review 1045-1109.
Barak, Aharon (2002), Forward: A Judge on Judging: The Role of a Supreme Court in
a Democracy, 116 Harvard Law Review 16-162,
Barkow, Rachel E. (2002), More Supreme Than Court？The Fall of the Political
Question Doctrine and the Rise of Judicial Supremacy, 102 Columbia Law
Review 237-336.Bickel, Alexander M. ( 1986) The Least Dangerous Branch : The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, 2nded., New Haven: Yale University Press.
Briffault, Richard (2001), Bush v. Gore as an Equal Protection Case, 29 Florida State University Law Review 325-376.
Bugliosi, Vincent (2001), The Betrayal of America-How the Supreme Court Undermine the Constitution and Chose Our President, New York：Thunder’s
Mouth Press/Nation Books.
Chemerinsky, Erwin (2002), How Should We Think about Bush v. Gore？, 34 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 1-21.
Choper, Jesse H. ( 2002), Why the Supreme Court Should Not Have Decided the
Presidential Election of 2000, 18 Constitutional Commentary 335-357.
Dame, Paul A. (2002), Stare Decisis, Chevron, and Skidmore: Do Administrative
Agencies Have the Power to Overrule Courts？, 44 William and Mary Law
Review 405-439.DeGregorio, William A. (ed.) ( 2004), The Complete Books of U.S. Presidents, New York: Barnes＆Noble Books.
Dershowitz, Alan M. (2001), Supreme Injustice-How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000, New York：Oxford University Press.
Dionne, E. J. Jr. and William Kristol (2001),“
Introduction-The Florida Moment,
”in E.J. Dionne Jr. and Bush v. Gore-The Court Cases and the Commentary , Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1-6.
Dorf, Michael C. (2001), The 2000 Presidential E lection: Archetype or Exception？, 99 Michigan Law Review 1279-1297.
Dover, Edwin D. (2003), The Disputed Presidential Election of 2000, Westport:
Greenwood Press.
Dworkin, Ronald (2002), “
Introduction,
”in Ronald Dworkin(ed.), A Badly Flowed Election-Debating Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court, and American Democracy, New York：The New Press, 1-15.Dworkin, Ronald (2002),“
A Badly Flawed Election,
” in Arthur J. Jacobson and Michel Rosenfeld (eds.), The Longest Night-Polemics and Perspectives on Election 2000, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 89-99.Edwards, Harry T. (2002), Race and the Judiciary, 20 Yale Law ＆ Policy Review 325-330.
Eisgruber, Christopher L. (2001), Constitutional Self-Government, Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
Endicott, Timothy (2003), The Reason of the Law, 48 The American Journal of Jurisprudence 83-106.
Entin, Jonathan L. (2002), Equal Protection, the Conscientious Judge, and the 2000
Presidential Election, 61 Maryland Law Review 576-605.
Epstein, Richard A. (2001), “I
n Suc h Manne r as t he Le gi s l at ur e The r e of May Di r e c t ”: The Outcome in Bush v. Gore Defended, 68 The University of Chicago
Law Review 613-635.Erikson, Robert S. (2001), The 2000 Presidential Election in Historical Perspective, 116(1) Political Science Quarterly 29-52.
Fallon, Richard H. Jr. (2004), The Dynamic Constitution-An Introduction to American Constitutional Law, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fallon, Richard H. Jr. (2003), Marbury and the Constitutional Mind: A Bicentennial
Essay on the Wages of Doctrinal Tension, 91 California Law Review 1-55.
Friedman, Richard D. (2001), Trying to Make Peace with Bush v. Gore, 29 Florida State University Law Review 811-869.
Fuentes-Rohwer, Luis and Guy-Uriel Charles (2001), The Electoral College, The
Right to Vote, and Our Federalism: A Comment on a Lasting Institution, 29
Florida State University Law Review 879-924.Garrett, Elizabeth (2001), Institutional Lessons from the 2000 Presidential Election, 29 Florida State University Law Review 975-993.
Garrett,Elizabeth (2001),“
Leaving the Decision to Congress,
”in Cass R. Sunstein and Richard A. Epstein (eds.), The Vote-Bush, Gore ＆ the Supreme Court, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 38-54.Gillman, Howard(2005),“
Bush v. Gore,
” in Kermit L. Hall (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, 2nded., New York: Oxford University Press, 126-130.Hall, Kermit L. (ed.)(2005), The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, 2nded., New York: Oxford University Press.
Hasen, Richard L. (2003), The Supreme Court and Election Law-Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore, New York: New York University Press.
Hill, J. L.(2004), The Five Faces of Freedom in American Political and Constitutional
Thought, 45 Boston College Law Review 499-594.
Hill, John Lawrence (2002), A Third Theory of Liberty: the Evolution of Our
Conception of Freedom in American Constitutional Thought, 29 Hastings
Constitutional Law Quarterly 115-184.Ifill, Sherrilyn A. (2002), Do Appearances Matters？：Judicial Impartiality and the
Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore, 61 Maryland Law Review 606-651.
Issacharoff, Samuel (2001), Political Judgment, 68 The University of Chicago Law Review 637-656.
Issacharoff, Samuel, Pamela S. Karlan, and Richard H. Pildes (2001), When Elections Go Bad-The Law of Democracy and the Presidential Election of 2000 , New York: Foundation Press.
Jacobson, Arthur J. (2001), “
The Ghostwriters,
”in ArthurJ.Jacobson and Michel Rosenfeld (eds.),The Longest Night-Polemics and Perspectives on Election 2000, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 189-211.Jacobson, Arthur J. and Michel Rosenfeld, “
Cast and Chronology,
” in Arthur J. Jacobson and Michel Rosenfeld (eds.), The Longest Night-Polemics andPerspectives on Election 2000, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 22-44.
Karlan, Pamela S. (2003), When Freedom Is
n’ t Fr e e: The Cos t s of J udi c i al Independence in Bush v. Gore, 64 Ohio State Law Journal 265-282.
Karlan, Pamela S. (2001), Unduly Partial: The Supreme Court and the Fourteenth
Amendment in Bush v. Gore, 29 Florida State University Law Review 587-602.
Karlan, Pamela S. (2001), “
The Newest Equal Protection Regressive Doctrine on a Changeable Court,
” in Cass R. Sunstein & Richard A. Epstein (eds.),The Vote-Bush, Gore ＆ the Supreme Court, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,77-97.Klarman, Michael J. (2001), Bush v. Gore Through the Lens of Constitutional History, 89 California Law Review 1721-1765.
Kramer, Larry D. (2001), The Supreme Court 2000 Term, Forward: We the Court, 115 Harvard Law Review 4-169.
Krent, Harold J. (2001), Judging Judging: The Problem of Second-Guessing State
J udge s ’ I nt e r pr e t at i on of St at e Law i n Bus h v . Gor e
, 29 Florida State University Law Review 493-534.Krotoszynski, Ronald J. Jr. (2002), An Epitaphios for Neutral Principles in
Constitutional Law: Bush v. Gore and the Emerging Jurisprudence of Oprah！,
90 The Georgetown Law Journal 2087-2141.Kumm, Mattias (2002), “
Democracy in America: A European Perspective on the Millennial Election,
”in ArthurJ.Jacobson and MichelRosenfeld (eds.),The Longest Night-Polemics and Perspectives on Election 2000, Berkeley, Calif.:University of California Press, 332-344.
Lund, Nelson (2002), “The Unbearable Rightness of Bush v. Gore,” in Arthur J. Jacobson and Michel Rosenfeld (eds.), The Longest Night-Polemics and Perspectives on Election 2000 , Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 144-188.
Marshall, William P. (2001), The Supreme Court, Bush v. Gore, And Rough Justice, 29 Florida State University Law Review 787-809.
McConnell, Michael W. (2001), Two-and-a-Half Cheers for Bush v. Gore, 68 The University of Chicago Law Review 657-678.
Monaghan, Henry Paul(2003),Supreme Court Review of State-Court Determinations
of State Law in Constitutional Cases, 103 Columbia Law Review 1919-1991.
Note (2001), Non Sub Homine？A Survey and Analysis of the Legal Resolution of
Election 2000, 114 Harvard Law Review 2170-2193.
Otter, Ronald C. Den (2004), The Place of Moral Judgment in Constitutional
Interpretation, 37 Indiana Law Review 375-416.
Overton, Spencer (2002), Rules, Standards, and Bush v. Gore: Form and the Law of
Democracy, 37 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 67-102.
Overton, Spence (2001), A Place at the Table: Bush v. Gore through the Lens of Race, 29 Florida State University Law Review 469-492.
Paulsen, Michael Stokes (2000), Abrogating Stare Decisis by Statute: May Congress
Remove the Precedential Effect of Roe and Casey？, 109 The Yale Law Journal
1535-1602.Polsby, Nelson W. (2002), “
Holy Cow ！ Preliminary Reflections on the 2000 Election,
”in Ronald Dworkin(ed.), A Badly Flowed Election-Debating Bush v.Gore, The Supreme Court and American Democracy, New York：The New Press, 265-283.
Posner, Richard A. (2002), “
Bush v. Gore as Pragmatic Adjudication,
” in Ronald Dworkin (ed.), A Badly Flowed Election-Debating Bush v. Gore, The Supreme Court and American Democracy, New York：The New Press, 187-214.Posner, Richard A. (2001), Bush v. Gore: Prolegomenon to an Assessment, 68 The University of Chicago Law Review 719-736.
Posner, Richard A.(2001), Breaking the Deadlock-The 2000 Election, the Constitutions, and the Courts, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001.
Post,Robert(2002),“Sustaining the Premise of Legality: Learning to Live with Bush
v. Gore,
”in BruceAckerman (ed.),Bush v.Gore-The Question of Legitimacy, New Heaven: Yale University Press, 96-109.Prakash, Saikrishna B. (2003), Overcoming the Constitution, 91 The Georgetown Law Journal 407-437.
Pushaw, Robert J. Jr. (2001), The Presidential Election Dispute, The Political
Question Doctrine, and the Fourteenth Amendment: A Reply to Professors Krent and Shane, 29 Florida State University Law Review 603-624.
Pyle, Ransford C., Heather Slusher and Carol Bast ( 2001), Bush v.
Gore-Understanding the American Legal System, Dallas, Taxas ： Pearson Publications Co.
Raskin, Jamin B. (2002), Wh
at ’ s Wr ong wi t h Bus h v . Gor e and Why We Nee d t o Amend the Constitution to Ensure it Never Happens Again, 61 Maryland Law
Review 652-710.Rosen, Jeffrey (2002), “
Political Question and the Hazards of Pragmatism,
”in Bruce Ackerman(ed.), Bush v. Gore-The Question of Legitimacy, New Heaven: Yale University Press.Rosenfeld,Michel(2001),“
Bush v. Gore: Three Strikes for the Constitution, the Court,
and Democracy, but There Is Always Next Season,
”in ArthurJ.Jacobson and Michel Rosenfeld (eds.), The Longest Night-Polemics and Perspectives onElection 2000, Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 111-143.
Rubenfeld,Jed (2002),“
Not as Bad as Plessey. Worse,
”in Bruce Ackerman (ed.), Bush v. Gore-The Question of Legitimacy, New Heaven: Yale University Press, 20-38.Schapiro, Robert A. (2001), Conceptions and Misconceptions of State Constitutional
Law in Bush v. Gore, 29 Florida State University Law Review 661-690.
Schlag, Pierre (1985), Rules and Standards, 33 UCLA Law Review 379-430.
Schwartz, Paul M. (2002), Voting Technology and Democracy, 77 New York University Law Review 625-698.
Segal, Jeffrey A. and Harold J. Spaeth (2004), The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited, Cambridge：Cambridge University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A. and Harold J. Spaeth (1993), The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A., Harold J. Spaeth and Sara C. Benesh (2005), The Supreme Court in the American Legal System, New York：Cambridge University Press.
Sergis, Diana K. (2003), Bush v. Gore-Controversial Presidential Election Case, Berkeley, N.J.: Enslow Publishers, Inc.
Stras, David R. and Karla Vehrs (2006), Foreword-The Future of the Supreme Court:
Institutional Reform and Beyond, 90 Minnesota Law Review 1147-1153.
Strauss, David A. (2001), Bush v. Gore: What Were They Thinking？, 68 The University of Chicago Law Review 737-756.
Sunstein,CassR.(2002),“
Lawless Order and Hot Cases,
”in Ronald Dworkin(ed.), A Badly Flawed Election-Debating Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court, and American Democracy, New York: The New Press, 75-104.Sunstein, Cass R. (2001), Order Without Law, 68 The University of Chicago Law Review 757-773.
Sunstein,CassR.(2001),“
Introduction-Of Law and Politics,
”in CassR.Sunstein ＆ Richard A. Epstein (eds.), The Vote-Bush, Gore ＆ the Supreme Court, Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 3-12.
Tokaji, Daniel P. (2003), First Amendment Equal Protection: On Discretion,
Inequality, and Participation, 101 Michigan Law Review 2409-2424.
Tribe,Laurence H.(2002),“
Freeing eroG v. hsuB from its Hall of Mirrors,
”in Ronald Dworkin (ed.), A Badly Flowed Election-Debating Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court, and American Democracy, New York：The New Press, 105-154.Tushnet,Mark (2002),“The Conservatism in Bush v. Gore,”in Bruce Ackerman (ed.), Bush v. Gore-The Question of Legitimacy, New Heaven: Yale University Press, 163-176.
Tushnet, Mark (2001), Renormalizing Bush v. Gore: An Anticipatory Intellectual