第五章 結論與建議
第二節 建議
本研究之研究目的為透過索引典控制詞彙以及語意關係的功能，來幫助使用 者提高對於大學圖書館網站標籤的理解，並協助使用者更好卡片分類法，達到提 升圖書館網站尋獲度。基於研究結果，本研究對臺師大圖書館及後續相關研究提 出以下建議：
一、 將網頁標籤結合索引典特性
本研究在過程中發現，有標示語意關係之標籤卡片在進行分類時，較可幫助 受試者進行實驗，也能提升受試者對標籤之瞭解。因此，本研究建議，在設計網 頁標籤時，若能利用索引典特性，將語意關係的標示和標籤系統做結合，能讓使 用者對網頁標籤能有更進一步的認識，進而提升網站的使用率。
二、 加強圖書館服務之推廣
研究過程中發現，受試者不瞭解部分圖書館網頁標籤的意義，或是在替換標 籤時不知該如何提出更適合的標籤，絕大部分是因為不熟悉圖書館的服務或未使 用過這項服務，甚至不知道圖書館有提供這樣的服務。由此可知，使用者對圖書 館服務的瞭解十分有限，因此圖書館應加強推廣及宣傳，讓使用者能夠更全面的 認識圖書館所提供的各項服務及資源，達到網站使用率的提升。
三、 探討受試者科系別影響
本研究之研究對象為所有在學學生，然而在研究過程中發現，不同科系的學 生於討論階段或卡片分類階段時，對圖書館網站標籤之理解情況略有差異，建議 後續研究可針對不同科系之受試者對於圖書館網站標籤之理解情況做深入的探 討。
四、 個人卡片分類法
本研究卡片分類法階段採用團體卡片分類法方式進行，雖然團體卡片分類法 可以藉由討論幫助受試者瞭解卡片標籤，研究者也可由討論過程從旁獲取許多資 料，然而在討論過程中，可能由於受試者個人特質或多數決的關係而忽略了少數 人的意見，因此，建議後續相關研究可採用個人卡片分類法的方式進行卡片類別 的探討。
五、 卡片分類法之分析方式
本研究於卡片分類法分析時由於樣本數小，採用質化分析的方式進行。然而 在分析過程中難免會參雜研究者主觀之意見，因此建議若樣本數較大之相關研究 在進行分析時，可以採取量化或其他分析方式進行。
參考文獻
英文部分
Ahlstrom, V., & Allendoerfer, K. (2004). Information organization for a portal using a card-sorting technique. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://hf.tc.faa.gov/technotes/dot-faa-ct-tn04-31.pdf
American National Standards Institute. (2005). Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://www.niso.org/kst/reports/standards/kfile_download?id:ustring:iso-8859-1=
Z39-19-2005.pdf&pt=RkGKiXzW643YeUaYUqZ1BFwDhIG4-24RJbcZBWg8 uE4vWdpZsJDs4RjLz0t90_d5_ymGsj_IKVaGZww13HuDlYn5U74YdfA-3Tffj xYQ25QrtR8PONuJLqxvo-l0NIr5
Boulton, M. (2007). Card sorting. Part 1. In Spencer, D., & Garrett, J. J. (Eds.). Card sorting: designing usable categories. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld.
Brooke, J. (1996). Sus: A quick and dirty usability scale. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://hell.meiert.org/core/pdf/sus.pdf
Campbell, N. (2001). Usability assessment of library-related web sites methods and case study. Chicago, IL: LITA
Courage, C., & Baxter, K. (2004). Understanding your users: A practical guide to user requirements methods, tools, and techniques. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Deaton, M. (2002). Sorting techniques for user-centered information design.
Retrieved January 10, 2011, from
http://www.mmdeaton.com/SortingTechniquesforInformationDesign.pdf
Dickstein, R., & Mills, V. (2000). Usability testing at the university of arizona library:
How to let users in on the design. Information technology and libraries, 19(3), 144-150.
Dixon, K., & Lowcay, B (2007). Creating a great website. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://www.phcris.org.au/phplib/filedownload.php?file=/elib/lib/downloaded_file s/publications/pdfs/phcris_pub_1214.pdf
Falks, A., & Hyland, N. (2000). Gaining user Insight: A case study illustrating the
card sort technique. College & Research Libraries, 61(4), 349-357.
Fincher, S., & Tenenberg, J. (2005). Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Systems, 22(3), 89-93.
Fox, R. (2008). Weaving the digital library web. OCLC Systems & Services, 24(1), 8-17.
Genius, S. K. (2004). Web site usability testing: a critical tool for libraries. Feliciter, 50(4), 161-164.
Hahsler, M., & Simon, B. (2001). User-centered navigation re-design for web-based information systems. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/usr/wi/bsimon/publikationen/navigation_re-design_am cis.pdf
Hawley, M. (2008). Extending card-sorting techniques to inform the design of web site hierarchies. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000332.php
Hinkle, V. (2008). Card-sorting: What you need to know about analyzing and interpreting card sorting results. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/102/cardsort.asp.
Kalbach, J. (2007). Designing Web Navigation. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly
Kaufman, J. (2006). Card sorting: An inexpensive and practical usability technique.
Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://www.stc.org/intercom/PDFs/2006/200611_17-19.pdf
Leise, F. (2007). Content Analysis Heuristics. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-analysis
Maurer, D., & Warfel, T. (2004). Card sorting: A definitive guide. Boxes and Arrows, April.
http://www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide.php Martin, S., & Kidwell, D. K. (2001). A case study in cluster analysis for intranet
organization. 2nd International Workshop on Engineering Management for Applied Technology, 57-64.
Mcgaw, J. (2009). Search Engine Optimization. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/k5x797x36222m808/fulltext.pdf McGills, L., & Toms, E. G. (2001). Usability of the academic library web site:
Implications for design. College & Research Libraries, 62, 355-367.
Mi, J., & Weng, C. (2008). Revitalizing the library OPAC: Interface, searching, and display challenge. Information Technology and Libraries, 27(1), 5-22.
Morville, P. (2005). Ambient findability: Libraries at the crossroads of ubiquitous computing and the internet. Online, 29(6), 16-21.
Motive. (2004). The Motive Web Design Glossary. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.motive.co.nz/glossary/label.php
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston, MA: Academic.
Nielsen, J. (2004). Card sorting: how many users to test. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040719.html
Nielsen, J. (2009). Card Sorting: Pushing Users Beyond Terminology Matches.
Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/word-matching.html
Nielsen, J., & Sano, D. (1994). 1994 design of SunWeb - Sun Microsystems' intranet.
Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.useit.com/papers/sunweb
Paul, C. L. (2007). A modified delphi approach to a new card sorting methodology.
Baltimore, MD: University of Baltimore.
Robertson, J. (2002). Information design using card sorting. Retrieved January 16, 2011,from
http://www.intranetjournal.com/articles/200202/pkm_02_05_02a.html
Rosenfeld. L., & Morville. P. (2007). Information architecture for the World Wide Web. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design and conduct effective tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Shackel, B. (1991). Usability: context, framework, definition, design and evaluation.
In B. Shackel & S. Richardson (Eds.), Human factors for informatics usability, (pp. 21-37). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Spencer, D., & Garrett J. J. (2009). Card sorting: Designing usable categories.
Brooklyn, N.Y. : Rosenfeld Media.
Spencer, D. (2007). Card sort analysis spreadsheet. Retrieved January 17, 2011, from http://www.rosenfeldmedia.com/books/cardsorting/blog/card_sort_analysis_spre
adsheet/
Spencer, D., & Warfel, T. (2004). Card sorting: a definitive guide. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide Toub, S. (2000). Evaluating information architecture. Retrieved January 16, 2011,
from http://argus-acia.com/white_papers/evaluating_ia.pdf
Tullis, T., & Wood, L. (2004). How many users are enough for a card-sorting study? . Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://home.comcast.net/~tomtullis/publications/UPA2004CardSorting.pdf Upchurch, L., Rugg, G., & Kitchenham, B. (2001). Using card sorts to elicit web page
quality attributes. IEEE Software, 18(4), 84-89.
Usability. gov. (2010). Information Architecture. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.usability.gov/methods/design_site/define.html#DefiningYourCategor iesLabels
Walbridge, S. (2000). Usability testing and libraries: The WSU experience. The Washington Library Association Journal, 16(3), 23-24.
Zimmerman, D. E., & Akerelrea, C. (2002). A group card sorting methodology for developing informational web sites. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=01049127 中文部分
國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。(Rubin, 1994) 戴玉美、劉元芳（2005）。我國 IA（信息構建）研究綜述。情報資料工作，143，
13-16。
謝寶煖、周秉貞（2003）。以顧客導向觀點評估政府網站之資訊架構。圖書與資 訊學刊，46，175-198。
謝建成、丁依玲、陳慧倫（2011）。大學圖書館網站資訊尋獲度之研究。資訊管 理學報，18（3），25-49。
謝建成、吳怡青（2010）。改進修正型德菲式卡片分類法探討大學圖書館網站尋 獲度之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，47（3），245-281。
謝建成、劉至逢（2009）。大學圖書館網站使用性評估之探討。教育資料與圖書 館學，47（2），163-198。
魏澤群（2005）。使用者最大：從優使性（Usability）出發的網站設計原則。臺 北市：網奕資訊科技。