第五章 結論與建議
第二節 建議
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
112
第二節 建議
壹、 對我國高等教育主管機關之建議
一. 我國高等教育教學評鑑應採納利害關係人意見作為參考修正
大學教師教學評鑑結果的使用可能會牽涉到大學教師的人事決策，以及 大學校院的補助金額，而評鑑的目的應在於對於反映教學成效以及使教學更 精進，另一方面亦保障學生在大學受教的品質和師生溝通的管道。因此建議 在進行學生評鑑教師教學時，針對該高等教育機構的發展方向以及針對教學 領域進行教學評鑑實施前應納入利害關係人的意見，考量全面性之得失，進 行評鑑之修正，以達到評鑑預期目的。
貳、 對我國大學行政主管之建議
一、對現行學生評鑑教學之量表進行重新檢視
本研究建議現行學生評鑑教師教學量表可與本研究之構面及指標進行 對照及修正，以提供學生選課前與意見回饋之訊息，更重要者，提供教師完 整之教學資訊，以求教學精進。
二、學生評鑑教師教學應重視所屬構面
大學在實施學生在評鑑教師教學時，宜參考本研究結果之指標及構面之 區隔，本研究透過國外教學卓越之大學和使用普及之學生評鑑教師教學量表 作為基礎，故指標內涵具有代表性，並參考專家以及利害關係者之意見進行 分群，分為三個構面以及八個次構面，具有結構性。
三、應參考不同指標之權重
實施學生評鑑教師教學之結果，應該參考本研究結果對指標之權重分數，
各指標相對重要性程度不一，大學主管機關在檢視學生給予教師教學之意見
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
113
時，應予以權重之區隔，方能呈現公平及完整的評鑑結果。
參、 對我國大學教師之建議
一. 檢視教學與評鑑指標之間之契合度
學生評鑑教師教學之指標的建立，能夠使教師在評鑑之前依據指標來規 劃教學活動，並且透過指標來進行教學之修正與教學準備。然而也可以透過 實際有效教學行動提出意見，以改善學生評鑑教師教學制度，也提供其他教 師在教學上之參考。
二. 顧及學生及教師對教學重要性之差異
依照本研究結果，學生與大學教學評鑑專家及教師對於教學上之差異，
學生所注重者為課程的價值，然而教師多認為是否能協助學生學習，因此在 教學上應顧及作為顧客者的學生之意見，而不單從教師之角度進行精進教 學。
肆、 對於未來研究之建議
一、持續針對指標系統做適當之更新
面對我國高等教育之發展趨勢，以及對大學教學的新觀點，都會使指標 無法貼近現實教學情況，因此除了發展更精準之指標外，新增其他重要性構 面或進行修正不敷使用指標，都是未來相關研究應持續進行的方向。
二、建構個別學門教學之權重指標
大學學生評鑑教師教學之主要構面都已經確立，不過針對不同領域學門 之教學仍然存在著相當的歧異程度，因此建議未來研究能夠針對不同學門的 教學方式進行分析，並從中修正並給予適合之權重。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
114
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
115
參考文獻
壹、 中文部分
王令宜（2004）。大學教師教學專業發展理論與實務。教育研究月刊，126，60-72。
何福田（1983）。大學生評鑑教師教學能夠促進師生感情之溝通。載於何福田（主 編），大學教育論文集（頁 263-266）。臺北：淡江大學。
余民寧（1997）。有意義的學習─概念構圖之研究。臺北：商鼎。
吳政達（1999）。國民小學教師評鑑指標體系建構之研究（未出版之博士論文）。 國立政治大學教育學研究所，臺北市。
吳政達（2008）。教育政策分析
-概念、方法與運用。臺北：高等教育文化事業有
限公司。吳政達、郭昭佑（1997）。概念構圖法在國民小學教科書評鑑標準建構之應用。
教育與心理研究，
20（2），217-242。
吳清山（1999）。家長教育選擇權之研究。臺北：臺北市立師範學院。
吳清山（2007）。我國大學評鑑：挑戰、因應策略與發展方向。課程與教學季刊，
10（4），15-30。
吳清山（2011）。我國高等教育革新的重要課題與未來發展之分析。長庚人文社 會學報，
4（2），241-280。
李春安（1994）。高級工、商業職業學校行政主管全面品質管理態度與學校組織 與學校關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文），彰化縣：國立彰化師範大學工業 教育研究所。
沈姍姍（1998）。自家長教育選擇權看教育機會均等。教育資料與研究，21，8-10。
林玉體（1999）。西洋教育史。臺北市：師大書苑。
洪雅琪（2008）。我國大學教師評鑑指標建構之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立 政治大學教育行政與政策研究所，臺北市。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
116
唐學明（1996）。多管道教學評鑑方法之研究─以政治作戰學校為例。復興崗學 報，57，167-187。
秦夢群（2006）。教育行政：實務部份。臺北市：五南。
馬信行（1999）。教育科學研究法。台北：五南。
張健邦（1993）。應用多變量分析。台北：文富。
張清濱（2002）。學校教育改革：課程與教學。臺北市：五南。
張媛甯、郭重明（2011）。大學教師教學專業發展之初探。學校行政，（71），
194-213。
張德勝（2002）。學生評鑑教師教學：理論、實務與態度。臺北市：楊智文化。
教育部（2009）。教育部獎勵大學教學卓越計畫。取自 http://www.csal.fcu.edu.tw/Edu/program_start.asp。
教育部高教司（2006）。獎勵大學教學卓越計畫九十五年度計畫作業手冊。臺北 市：教育部高教司。
淡江大學教育研究中心（1985）。淡江大學教學評鑑教師意見調查研究。臺北縣：
淡江大學。
郭昭佑（2000）。學校本位評鑑。臺北市：五南。
陳碧祥（2001）。我國大學教師升等制度與教師專業成長及學校發展定位關係之 探究。國立台北師範學院學報，14，163-208。
湯志民（1990）。視導與評鑑。載於蔡保田（主編），學校行政（頁 126-151）。高 雄：復文。
黃政傑（1999）。落實教學評鑑的實施。教師天地，99，39-45。
黃政傑（2013）。大學招收國際生的政策展望。教育評論月刊，
2（1），1-3。
黃耀輝（2002）。教學健檢
─教師教學評鑑研究。臺北：問津堂。
葉重新（1987）。台灣地區九所大學教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」期望之研究（未 出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學教育學研究所，臺北。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
117
葉連祺、董娟娟、楊世英、陳仁海、蕭芳華（2005）。大學學生評鑑教學量表之 編製。測驗學刊，
52（1），59-82。
鄭博真（2012）。我國大學教師專業發展之現況、困境與展望。教育研究與發展 期刊，
8（1），61-92。
貳、 英文部分
A. Parpala , S. Lindblom‐Ylänne & H. Rytkönen (2011). Students’ conceptions of good teaching in three different disciplines. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
Education, 36(5), 549-563.
Abrami, P., d’Apollonia, S., & Rosenfield, S. (2007). The Dimensionality of Student Ratings of Instruction: What We Know and What We Do Not*. The Scholarship
of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective,
385-456.Aleamoni, L. M., & Hexner, P. Z. (1980). A review of the research on student evaluation and a report on the effect of different sets of instructions on student course and instructor evaluation. Instructional Science, 9(1), 67-84.
Anderberg, M. R. (1973). Cluster analysis for application. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Arreola, R. A. (2007). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A
handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system (3th ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker.
Atkins, S., Brinko, K. T., Butts, J., Claxton, C. S., & Hubbard, G. T. (2001). Faculty quality of life. To improve the academy, 19, 323-346.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (3rd ed.).
Berkshire, England: McGraw Hill.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
118
Blunt, A. (1991). The effects of anonymity and manipulated grades on student ratings of instructors, Community College Review, 18, 48-54.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate.
Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Brancato, V. C. (2003). Professional development in higher education. New Directions
for Adult and Continuing Education, (98), 59-66.
Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual
and institutional performance. San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass.
Braskamp, L. A., Brandenburg, D. C., Ory, J. C., Kohen, E., & Mayberry, P. W.
(1984). Evaluating teaching effectiveness: A practical guide. Beverly Hills, Calif:
Sage.
Carnell, E. (2001). The value of meta-learning dialogue. Professional Development
Today, 4, 43-54.
Carnell, E. (2007). Conceptions of effective teaching in higher education: extending the boundaries. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 25-40.
Cashin, W. E. (1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently. New
directions for teaching and learning, 1990(43), 113-121.
Cashin, W. E., & Downey, R. G. (1992). Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of educational Psychology, 84(4), 563.
Catano, V. M., & Harvey, S. (2011). Student perception of teaching effectiveness:
development and validation of the Evaluation of Teaching Competencies Scale (ETCS). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(6), 701-717.
doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.484879
Centra, J. A. (1983). Research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Research in
Higher Education, 18, 379-389.
Centra, J.A. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
119
Determining Faculty Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cohen, P. A. (1980). Using student ratings feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education, 13, 321-341.
Concept Systems Software (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. Ithaca, NY. Concept Systems, Inc
D. George(2007). Market overreach: The student as customer. The Journal of
Socio-Economics, 36, 965–977.
Dalhousie University, Centre for Learning and Teaching. (June, 2011). Student Rating of Instruction. Retrieved From
http://www.dal.ca/content/dam/dalhousie/pdf/university_secretariat/Senate%20D ocs/Student%20Ratings%20of%20Instruction.pdf
doi:10.1002/ace.100
Douglass, J. A. (2005). The Carnegie Commission and Council on Higher Education:
A Retrospective. Retrieve from: http://cshe.berkeley.edu/
Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings. Enhancing Teaching and Learning Environments in
Undergraduate Courses Occasional Report, 1.
Feldman, K. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students' ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don't. Research in Higher Education, 9, 199-242.
Feldman, K. A. (1979). The significance of circumstances for college students' ratings of their teachers and courses. Research in Higher Education, 10, 149-172.
Feldman, K. A. (1984). Class size and college students' evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look. Research in Higher Education, 21, 45-116.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
120
Feldman, K. A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis, Research in Higher Education, 24, 139-213.
Feldman, K. A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education, 30, 137-189.
Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students' views of male and female college teachers:
Part II—Evidence from students' evaluations of their classroom teachers.
Research in Higher Education, 34, 151-211.
Firth, G. R., & Pajak, E. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of research on school supervision.
Macmillan Library Reference USA.
Follman, J. (1996). Elementary public school pupil rating of teacher effectiveness.
Child Study Journal, 25(1), 57-78。
Frankhouser, W. M. (1984). The effects of different oral directions as to disposition of results on student ratings of college instruction. Research in Higher Education,
20, 367-374.
Franklin, J., Theall, M. & Ludlow, L. (1991). Grade inflation and student ratings: A
closer look. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational
Research Association, Chicago.Frazer, M. (1992). Quality assurance in higher education. Quality assurance in higher
education. 9-25. London: the Falmer Press.
Frey, P. W. (1976). Validity of student instructional ratings: Does timing matter?
Journal of Higher Education, 47, 327-336.
Frost, S. H., & Teodorescu, D. (2001). Teaching excellence: How faculty guided change at a research university. The Review of Higher Education, 24(4), 397-415.
Gary, B., Debra, B., & Stollenwerk, A. (2000). Effective teaching methods. London:
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
121
Prentice-Hall International Limited.
Gross, M.A. & Hogler, R. (2005). What the Shadow Knows: Exploring the Hidden Dimensions of the Consumer Metaphor in Management Education. Journal of
Management Education, 29(1), 3-16.
Harvard University, Registrar of FAS. (September, 2011). Sample Course Evaluation.
Retrieved from http://www.registrar.fas.harvard.edu/evals/univ_sample.html Howard K. Wachtel (1998): Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness: a
brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191-212.
Howard, G. S., Conway, C. G. & Maxwell, S. E. (1985). Construct validity of measures of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology,
77, 187-196.
http://www.humber.ca/sites/www.humber.ca/files/student_feedback_questionnaire_po licy.pdf
Humber College, The Humber College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning.
(January, 2013). Student Feedback Questionnaire. Retrieved From
IDEA (2009). Directions to Faculty-IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction. Retrieved from http://theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/DirectionsToFaculty.pdf
Imperial College London, Registry(2013). UG SOLE lecturer/module questions for 2013-4. Retrieved from
http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/registry/proceduresandregulations/surveys/sole/ugsol equestions
Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation (Vol. 50). Sage.
Knight, P. (2002). Being a teacher in higher education. Society for Research in Higher Education and the Open University Press.
Koermer, C. D. & Petelle, J. L. (1991). Expectancy violation and student rating of
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
122
instruction. Communication Quarterly, 39(4), 341-350.
Koushki, P. A. & Kuhn, H. A. J. (1982). How reliable are student evaluations of teachers? Engineering Education, 72, 362-367.
Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage Publications, Inc.
Laing, L., & Laing, G. (2011). The student as customer model and its impact on the
academic leadership role in higher education. In Meeting the Challenges:
Proceedings of the ATN Assessment Conference 2011. Curtin University.
Levine, A. E. (2000). The future of colleges: 9 inevitable changes. The Chronicle of
Higher Education, 47(9), B10.
Lindeman, C. A. (2000). The future of nursing education. Journal of Nursing
Education, 39, 5-12.
Marsh, H. W. & Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and
Research, 8, 143-233, NY: Agathon Press.
Marsh, H. W. & Overall, J. U. (1980). Validity of students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Cognitive and affective criteria, Journal of Educational Psychology,
72, 468-475.
Marsh, H. W. & Rochel, L. (1993). The use of students' evaluations and an
individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness.
American Educational Research Journal, 30, 217-251.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research [Special Issue].
International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-388.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
123
Marsh, H. W., & Ryan, M. (1981). Effects of expressiveness, content coverage and incentive on multidimensional student rating scale: New interpretations of Dr.
Fox effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 126-134.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Office of the HASS Requirement.(May, 2009).
MIT Online Subject Evaluation AY2010-11. Reteieved from
http://tll.mit.edu/sites/default/files/examples/course-eval-hass-ay11-questions.pdf Mccallum, L. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of course evaluation data and its use in the
tenure decision. Research in Higher Education, 21, 150-158.
McGill University, Teaching and Learning Services. (2008). Mid-Course Evaluations.
Retrieve from http://www.mcgill.ca/tls/teaching/course-evaluations
McGuire, S. Y., & Williams, D. A. (2001). The millennial learner: Challenges and opportunities. To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and
organizational development, 20, 185-195.
Mckeachie, W. J. (1979). Student ratings of faculty: A reprise. Academe, 65, 384-397.
Mckeachie, W. J. (1990). Research on college teaching: The historical background.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 189-200.
McKeachie, W. J. (1990). Research on college teaching: The historical background.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 189.
Menges, R. J. (1991) The real world of teaching improvement: A faculty perspective.
Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 48, 21-37.
Moore, S., Walsh, G., & Rísquez, A. (2007). Teaching at College and University :
Effective Strategies and Key Principles. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Murray, H. (1997). Effective teaching behaviours in the college classroom. In Effective Teaching in Higher Education. New York: Agathon Press.
Murray, H. G., Rushton, P. J. & Paunonen, S. V. (1990). Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses, Journal of
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
124
Educational Psychology, 82, 250-261.
Murray, H. G., Rushton, P. J. & Paunonen, S. V. (1990). Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses, Journal of
Educational Psychology, 82, 250-261.
National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education.(1997). Higher education for a
learning society (The Dearing Report). London: HMSO.
Novak, J. D. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.
Oliva, P. F. & Pawlas, G. E (2001). Supervision for today’s school. (8th ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 469-548.
Overall, J. U. & Marsh, H. W. (1979). Midterm feedback from students: Its
relationship to instructional improvement and students' cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 321-325.
Peterson, K. D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions
and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
PravE, R. S. & Baril, G. L. (1993). Instructor ratings: Controlling for bias from initial student interest. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 362-366.
Princeton University, The McGraw Center for Teaching & Learning. (September, 2011). Princeton Mid-term Evaluation Questions. Retrieved from
Princeton University, The McGraw Center for Teaching & Learning. (September, 2011). Princeton Mid-term Evaluation Questions. Retrieved from