研究建議

本研究以質性研究的方法找出情節中的重要因素，並據以提出情節資料庫之 資料模型，但受限於時間與人力上的問題，在研究範圍或結果上相信仍有許多可 發揮之處，因此針對後續研究提出以下幾點建議：

z 本研究目標為提出一情節資料庫建構之方法，研究範圍並未論及未來資 料庫之使用。後續研究可針對情節資料庫之潛在使用者(e.g., 設計師) 進行研究以了解使用者對情節資料庫的需求，加以探討此架構是否有需 要改進之處。

z 本研究所鎖定的活動領域限定於與機車有關之活動上，雖然最後結果所 提出之情節資料庫模型已將活動加以一定程度之抽象化，但此結果對於 其他類型活動或是其他使用者族群之適用程度並未加以驗證，後續研究 可以針對其他領域與使用者族群進行，以擴大此情節資料庫之應用範 圍。

z 本研究所提出之情節資料庫僅止於資料模型之確立，並未進入實際資料 庫建立之階段，因此所提出之資料模型在實作上可能尚有需要改進的地 方。後續研究可利用此資料模型實際建立一情節資料庫並填入情節資 料，探討此架構在實際運用時可能的問題。

參考文獻

中文部份：

黃惇勝(1995)。台灣式KJ法原理與技術：邁向21世紀改造台灣的思考武器。台北 市：中國生產力。

英文部份：

Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T.(2002).

Using activity theory to understanding the systemic tensions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76-107.

Bertelsen, O. W. & Bødker, S. (2003). Activity theory. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.). HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science (pp.

291-324). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Benner, K. M., Feather, M. S., Johnson, W. L. & Zorman, L. A. (1993). Utilizing Scenarios in the Software Development Process. In N. Prakash, C. Rolland, & B.

Pernici (Eds.). Information System Development Process (pp. 117-134).

Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Benyon, D & Macaulay, C. (2002). Scenarios and the HCI-SE design problem.

Interacting with Computers, 14(4), 397-405.

Benyon, D., Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2005). Designing interactive systems: People, activities, contexts, technologies. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.

Carroll, J. M. (1995). Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Carroll, J. M. (2000). Making use: Scenario-based design. New York, NY: Wiley.

Chance, B. D. & Melhart, B. E. (1999). A taxonomy for scenario use in requirements elicitation and analysis of software systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings

of the IEEE conference and workshop on engineering of computer-based systems.

Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. (n.d.). Helsinki, Finland: Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research. Retrieved February 24, 2008, from the World Wide Web:

http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/pages/chatanddwr/chat/

Elmasri, R. & Navathe, S. B. (2008)。資料庫系統原理(陳玄林譯)。臺北市: 臺灣培 生教育。(原著出版年: 2006 年)

Engeström , Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity - theoretical approach to developmental Research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit, OY.

Filippidou, D. (1998). Designing with scenarios: A critical review of current research and practice. Requirements Engineering, 3(1), 1-22.

Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

Go, K. & Carroll, J. M. (2004). The blind men and the elephant: Views of scenario-based system design. Interaction, 11(6), 44-53.

Hoffer, J. A., Prescott, M. B., & McFadden, F. R. (2005)。資料庫管理與應用(林慶德 譯)。臺北市: 臺灣培生教育。(原著出版年: 2004年)

Honold, P. (2000). Culture and context: An empirical study for the development of a framework for the elicitation of cultural influence in product usage.

Human-Computer Interaction, 12(3&4), 327-345.

Hsia, P., Samuel, J., Gao, J., Kung, D., Toyoshima, Y., & Chen, C. (1994). Formal approach to scenario analysis. IEEE Software, 11(2), 33-41.

Jarke, M., Bui, X. T., & Carroll, J. M. (1998). Scenario management: An interdisciplinary approach. Requirements Engineering, 3(3-4), 155-173.

Kofod-Petersen, A. & Cassens, J. (2005). Activity theory and context-awareness.

Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IJCAI-05 Workshop on Modeling and Retrieval of Context (MRC 2005).

Korpela, M., Soriyan, H. A., & Olufokunbi, K. C. (2000). Activity analysis as a method for information systems development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 191-210.

Kreifeldt, J. G. (1987). Guarding snowblowers. Paper presented in Interface 87 Proceedings. Human Implications of Product Design. Human Factors Society, Consumer Products Technical Group Santa Monica, CA, pp. 259–304.

Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness. Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT

Press.

Kyng, M. (1995). Creating contexts for design. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.). Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development (pp. 85-107).

New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Lam, W., McDermid, T. A., & Vickers, A.J. (1997). Ten steps towards systematic requirements reuse. Paper presented at the Proceeding of Third IEEE

International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

Miettinen, R. & Hasu, M. (2002). Articulating user needs in collaborative design:

Towards an activity-theoretical approach. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(1-2), 129-151.

Nardi, B. A. (1992). The use of scenarios in design. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(4), 13-14.

Norman, D. A. (1980). Twelve issues for cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 1-32.

Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive Engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp.31-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence.

Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things.

New York, NY: Basic Books.

Reisner, D. (1992). Further uses of scenario. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(3), 15.

Rolland, C., Achour, C. B., Cauvet, C., Ralyté, J., Sutcliffe, A., Maiden, N., Jarke, M., Haumer, P., Pohl, K., Dubois, E., & Heymans, P. (1998). A proposal for a

scenario classification framework. Requirements Engineering, 3(1), 23-47.

Rosson, M. B. & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Scenario-Based Design. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 1032-1050). Mahwah, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan management review, 36(2), 25-40.

Stern, P. N. (1980). Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes. Image, 12, 20-23.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London, UK: Sage Publications.

Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suri, J.F., Marsh, M. (2000). Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 151-157.

Sutcliffe, A. G. & Maiden, N. A. M. (1998). Supporting scenario-based requirements engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(12), 1072-1088.

Turner, P., Turner, S., & Horton, J. (1999). From description to requirements: An activity theoretic perspective. In S. C. Hayne (Ed.), Proceedings GROUP '99 (pp.

286-295).

Uden, L. (2007). Activity theory for designing mobile learning. Mobile Learning and Organisation, 1(1), 81-102.

Vredenburg, K., Mao, J. Y., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. (2002). A survey of

user-centered design practice. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI

conference on Human factors in computing systems.

Wang, W., Hufnagel, S., Hsia, P., & Yang, S.M. (1992). Scenario driven

requirements analysis method. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Second

International Conference on Systems Integration.

Welker, K., Sanders, E. B. N., & Couch, J. S. (1997). Design scenarios to understand the user. Innovation, Fall, 24-27.