第五章、 結論與討論
第四節 研究建議
一、 校園建議
本研究確立了研究者的主張，學童對於校園綠地活動以及3C 使用時間皆與 涉入度、自然連結經驗與環境行為皆有關聯，這或許可以提供學童大自然活動或 是3C 使用時間的參考。
同時，環境教育內容應更佳多元，不應只是課堂上的學習，多善加利用校園 空間與綠地活動可以有效增加學童的環境行為，本研究顯示出3C 使用頻率與綠 地活動頻率呈負相關，也因此如何拿捏彼此平衡，或是如何戒斷學童網路／3C
104
參考文獻
西文部分
Bobby, G. (1995). The importance of leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure
Research, 12(4), 279-299.
Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place
attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences,
22(4), 233-257.
Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11-21.
Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. Journal of
Environmental Education, 31(1), 15-26.
DeVellis, R. F. (1991).Scale Development Theory and Application. London: SAGE.
Fang, W. T., Ng, E., & Chang, M. C. (2017). Physical outdoor activity versus indoor activity: their influence on environmental behaviors. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7), 797.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007).
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters 3:390-394.
Havitz, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1995). How enduring is enduring involvement? A seasonal examination of three recreational activities. Journal of Consumer
Psychology, 4(3), 255-276.
Havitz, M. E., & Mannell, R. C. (2005). Enduring involvement, situational
106
Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
Howell, A. J., Passmore, H. A., & Buro, K. (2013). Meaning in nature: Meaning in life as a mediator of the relationship between nature connectedness and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(6), 1681-1696.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in
environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163-178.
Kapferer, J. N., & Laurent, G. (1985). Consumers' involvement profile: New empirical results. Advances in Consumer Research, 12, 290-295.
Kapferer, J. N., & Laurent, G. (1993). Further evidence on the consumer involvement profile: five antecedents of involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 10(4), 347-355.
Kellert, S. R. (1997). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Island Press.
Kyle, G., Bricker, K., Graefe, A., & Wickham, T. (2004). An examination of
recreationists' relationships with activities and settings. Leisure Sciences, 26(2), 123-142.
Leeming, F. C., Dwyer, W. O., & Bracken, B. A. (1995). Children's environmental attitude and knowledge scale: Construction and validation. Journal of
Environmental Education, 26(3), 22-31.
Manoli, C. C., Johnson, B., & Dunlap, R. E. (2007). Assessing children's environmental worldviews: Modifying and validating the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for use with children. Journal of Environmental Education,
38(4), 3-13.
McIntyre, N. (1989). The personal meaning of participation: Enduring involvement.
Journal of Leisure Research, 21(2), 167.
McIntyre, N. (1990). Recreation Involvement: The Personal Meaning of
Participation, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of New England, USA.
McIntyre, N., & Pigram, J. J. (1992). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case
of vehicle‐based campers. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 3-15.
Miller, G. T., & Spoolman, S. (2013). Environmental Science, 14. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA, USA.
Mittal, B., & Lee, M. S. (1989). A causal model of consumer involvement. Journal of
Economic Psychology, 10(3), 363-389.
Ng, C. F. (1998). Canada as a new place: the immigrant’s experience. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 55-67.
Nichols, D. R. (1990). Tactual environmental interpretation: A multisensory approach.
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84(3), 124-125
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale:
Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740.
Pettus, A. M., & Giles, M. B. (1987). Personality characteristics and environmental attitudes. Population & Environment, 9(3), 127-137.
Ramsey, C. E., & Rickson, R. E. (1976). Environmental knowledge and attitudes.
Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), 10-18.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion
Selin, S. W., & Howard, D. R. (1988). Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(3), 237-244.
Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The Psychology of Ego-involvements: Social
Attitudes and Identifications. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
Sims, J. K. (2001). Green Schools: A design fad or a trend worth embracing ? School
Planning & Management, 40(3), 25-26.
108
of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York, NY, USA.
Watkins, M. N. (1986). The Influence of Involvement and Information Search on
Consumers' Choices of Recreation Activities, unpublished Doctoral dissertation,
University of Oregon, USA.Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of
Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.
中文部分
Klaus Schwab（2017）。第四次工業革命。臺灣：天下文化。
王佩蓮（2000）。國小環境教育檢核表之探討。臺北市立師範學院學報，31，
319-346。
危芷芬（譯）（2012）。環境心理學（原作者：Frank T. McAndrew）。臺北市：
新加坡商聖智學習（原著出版年：1993）。
朱柔若（譯）（2000）。社會研究方法：質化與量化取向（原作者：W. Lawrence Neuman）。臺北市：揚智文化。
何昕家、張子超 （2011）。初探「環境中的心理、行為與教育相關理論」——
以校園建成環境為基礎。通識教育學報，5，85-103。
吳明修（2001）。值得在臺灣建築史上記上一筆：宜蘭縣學校建築巡禮。宜蘭縣 政府主編之宜蘭縣國民中小學學校建築專輯。宜蘭：宜蘭縣政府。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2014）。SPSS 與統計應用分析。臺北市：五南圖書。
吳清基（1990）。精緻教育的理念。臺北：師大書苑。
吳清基（2011）。聽！校園裡的綠色樂章。臺北：教育部。
李明堂（2003）。九二一地震災區重建小學校園規劃與學校建築分析研究：以新 校園運動之小學。屏東師院學報，18。
林木貴（1989）。國小校園設計研究。臺灣省政府教育廳編印。
林清江（1986）。教育的未來導向。臺北市：臺灣書店。
林盛豐（2001）。迫切的危機——校園重建中九二一重建推動委員會的角色。教
110
郝冰、王西敏（譯）（2014）。失去山林的孩子（原作者：Richard Louv）。臺 北：野人
高翠霞（2011）。環境與學習行為。T&D 飛訊，117。
張偉豪（2011）。SEM 論文寫作不求人。臺北市：鼎茂圖書
陳雅雲（譯）(2010）。逆時針：哈佛教授教你重返最佳狀態（原作者：Ellen J.
Langer）。臺北市：方智。
蔡保田（1977）。學校建築學。臺北市：臺灣商務印書館。
蕭秀玲、莊慧秋、黃漢耀（譯）（1991）。環境心理學。臺北市：心理出版社有 限公司。
龍應台（2001）。海闊天空——美的學習，捕捉看不到的競爭力。臺北市：天下 雜誌。
聶筱秋、胡中凡（譯）（2003）。環境心理學（原作者：Paul A. Bell）。臺北：桂 冠圖書。
顏志龍、鄭中平（2016）。給論文寫作者的統計指南：傻瓜也會跑統計。臺北 市：五南圖書。
網頁資料：
新北市教育局（2018 年 4 月）
https://www.ntpc.edu.tw/content/?parent_id=10015&type_id=10015 教育部全球資訊網（2018 年 4 月）
https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=3E18D28
CAE93DF45
112
附件一、涉入度量表
Scale items Involvement1 Attraction
A1 ____ is important to me
A2 Participating in ____ is one of the most enjoyable things that I do A3 Participating in ____ is one of the most satisfying things that I do A4 I have little or no interest in ____ .
A5 ____offers me relaxation when pressures build up Centrality
C1 I find a lot of my life is organized around ____ . C2 I find a lot of my life is organized around ____ . C3 Most of my friends are in some way connected with . Self expression
SE1 When I participate in ___ I can really be myself SE2 You can tell a lot about a person be seeing them ___ .
SE3 When I participate in ___ other see me the way I want them to see me SE4 ___ says a lot about who I am
量表來自：Kyle, G., Bricker, K., Graefe, A., & Wickham, T. (2004). An examination of recreationists' relationships with activities and settings. Leisure Sciences, 26(2), 123-142.
附件二、自然連結經驗量表
Item
NR-Experience
The thought of being deep in the woods, away from civilization, is frightening My ideal vacation spot would be a remote, wilderness area
I enjoy being outdoors, even in unpleasant weather I don’t often go out in nature
I enjoy digging in the earth and getting dirt on my hands I take notice of wildlife wherever I am
量表來自：Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740.
114
附件三、環境態度量表
Scale item
1. Planes and animals have as much right as people to live.
2. There arc too many (or almost too many) people on earth.
3. People are clever enough to keep from ruining the earth.
4. People muse still obey the laws of nature.
5. When people mess with nature it has bad results.
6. Nature is stronog enough to handle the bad effects of our modern lifestyle.
7. People are supposed to rule over the rest of nature.
8. People are treating nature badly.
9. People will someday know enough about how nature works to be able to control it.
10 If things don’t change, we will have a big disaster in the environment soon.
量表來自：Manoli, C. C., Johnson, B., & Dunlap, R. E. (2007). Assessing children's environmental worldviews: Modifying and validating the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for use with children. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(4), 3-13.
附件四、環境行為量表
Environmental Behaviors I persuade others to sort waste.
I go outdoors in my free time, rather than watching TV and sitting in front of the computer.
I participate in environmental activities conducted outdoors.
I participate in conducting surveys on animal and plant-related activities in the vicinity of
the community.
I visit the park and volunteer.
量表來自：Fang, W. T., Ng, E., & Chang, M. C. (2017). Physical outdoor activity versus indoor activity: their influence on environmental behaviors. International
journal of environmental research and public health, 14(7), 797.
116
附件五、問卷初稿
親愛的小朋友好：
謝謝小朋友們幫忙填寫問卷，這不是考試不會列入成績，不必寫上名字座 號。
請你慢慢看清楚題目並填答，依照自己真實的想法，沒有「對」或「錯」，所 以不會公布任何內容。
另外請仔細作答，每一題都要記得作答喔，如有讀不懂得地方可以舉手發 問。
非常謝謝你的合作。
祝 身體健康、學業進步
國立臺灣師範大學環境教學研究所 指導教授 方偉達博士 研究生 劉坤儒編製 2017 年 6 月
第壹部份－個人資料：請將您的資料，在「□」內打「V」。
小朋友們，下面問卷對於校園綠地指的是校園裡的水池、農場、田地、草地、
森林、濕地
一. 性別：□男□女
118
第参部分－自然連結經驗
120
附件六、預試問卷、正式問卷
親愛的小朋友好：
謝謝小朋友們幫忙填寫問卷，這不是考試，不會列入成績，不必寫上名字座號。
請你慢慢看清楚題目並填答，依照自己真實的想法，沒有「對」或「錯」的答案，請安 心作答，所以也不會公布任何最後成績，一切保密。
另外請仔細作答，每一題都要記得作答喔，如有讀不懂得地方可以舉手發問 非常謝謝你的合作。
祝 身體健康、學業進步
國立臺灣師範大學環境教學研究所 指導教授 方偉達博士 研究生 劉坤儒編製 2018 年 4 月 小朋友們，下面問卷對於校園綠地指的是校園裡的水池、農場、田
地、草地、森林、濕地等戶外綠色空間
第壹部份－個人資料：請將您的資料，在「□」內打「V」。
一. 性別：□男□女
二. 每個禮拜我到校園任一處綠地戶外活動，通常我花了幾節(幾次)下課時間：
□0-5 次 □6-10 次 □11-15 次 □16-20 次 □21 次以上 三. 家長學歷：
父親學歷
□1.國中以下(含國中) □2.高中職 □3.大學、大專 □4.碩士 □5.博士
母親學歷
□1.國中以下(含國中) □2.高中職 □3.大學、大專 □4.碩士 □5.博士
122
第貳部分－校園綠地涉入度
124
第伍部分－環境行為