第五章 結論與建議
第三節 研究貢獻
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議 一、研究限制
本研究主要限制有以下兩點：
1. 公辦都更數量稀少且地區侷限
本研究所選個案有一定距離，且局限於台北市，對於公辦都更的屬性可能會 隨著民眾對於政治的熱忱和地區有所不同；個案的選擇上，由於訪問的侷限，除 了斯文里外，無法訪問到進展較快的水源二三期與南機場。
2. 駐點工作站整合經驗尚少
目前公辦都更剛開始推動，駐點工作站設立並不長，駐點人員對於地方的業 務與居民的特性和所需的協助可能尚未熟悉。
二、未來研究建議
未來建議可以針對較有經驗的駐點工作站案件，對於里長來說，訪問的時機 不能離都更案結束的期間太久，該研究訪問的里長有因年代久遠而無法想起細節 的狀況，對於研究可能喪失了一些可能的洞見。
另外在選擇多個個案上，可以選擇更新面積一致或居民屬性較為相似的都更 案，進行更深入的比對，去除因不同歷史脈絡下而產生不同行為的因素。
‧
Agus, A., Barker, S., & Kandampully, J. (2007). An exploratory study of service quality in the Malaysian public service sector. International Journal of Quality &
Reliability Management, 24(2), 177-190.
Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K. J., & Swan, J. E. (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality. Journal of Services marketing, 10(6), 62-81.
Brysland, A., & Curry, A. (2001). Service improvements in public services using SERVQUAL. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 11(6), 389-401.
Buckley, J. (2003). E-service quality and the public sector. Managing Service Quality:
An I nternational Journal, 13(6), 453-462.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2003, September). Trust in government–the significance of modernism, political cynicism and integration. In EGPA Annual Conference, Workshop on Quality, Satisfaction, and Trust in Government: Reassessing Trust in a Reinvented Government, September (pp. 3-6)
Cooper, D. (2004). Organisational Change: from Public to Private Sector A UK based reflective Case Study. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5(1/2), 474-80.
Deichmann, U. and Lall, S. (2007). ‘Citizen feedback and delivery of urban services’, World Development, 35(4): 649–662
Delfgaauw, J., & Dur, R. (2007). Incentives and workers’ motivation in the public
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
sector. The Economic Journal, 118(525), 171-191.
Donnelly, M., Wisniewski, M., Dalrymple, J. F., & Curry, A. C. (1995). Measuring service quality in local government: the SERVQUAL approach. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 8(7), 15-20.
Dotchin, J. A., & Oakland, J. S. (1994). Total quality management in services: Part 1:
Understanding and classifying services. International Journal of Quality &
Reliability Management, 11(3), 9-26.
Glaser, M. A., & Bardo, J. W. (1994). A five-stage approach for improved use of citizen surveys in public investment decisions. State & Local Government Review, 161-172.
Gowan, M., Seymour, J., Ibarreche, S., & Lackey, C. (2001). Service quality in a public agency: same expectations but different perceptions by employees, managers, and customers. Journal of Quality Management, 6(2), 275-291.
Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of marketing, 18(4), 36-44.
Ho, C. T. B., & Lin, W. C. (2010). Measuring the service quality of internet banking: scale development and validation. European Business Review, 22(1), 5-24.
Jarrar, Y., & Schiuma, G. (2007). Measuring performance in the public sector:
challenges and trends. Measuring Business Excellence, 11(4), 4-8.
Kampen, J. K., Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003, March). On the relative role of
‧
dimensions on customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty in e-commerce settings: A cross cultural analysis. Asia pacific journal of marketing and logistics, 22(3), 351-371.
Kearsey, A., & Varey, R. J. (1998). Manageralist thinking on marketing for public services. Public Money and Management, 18(2), 51-60.
Kumar, M., Tat Kee, F., & Charles, V. (2010). Comparative evaluation of critical factors in delivering service quality of banks: An application of dominance analysis in modified SERVQUAL model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(3), 351-377.
Lentell, R. (2000). Untangling the tangibles:'physical evidence'and customer satisfaction in local authority leisure centres. Managing Leisure, 5(1), 1-16.
Lewis, B. R., & Mitchell, V. W. (1990). Defining and measuring the quality of customer service. Marketing intelligence & planning, 8(6), 11-17.
Licari, M. J., McLean, W., & Rice, T. W. (2005). The condition of community streets and parks: A comparison of resident and nonresident evaluations. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 360-368.
MacCarthaigh, M., Roness, P. G., & Sarapuu, K. (2012). Mapping public sector organizations: An agenda for future research. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(12), 844-851.
Matthews, J., & Shulman, A. D. (2005). Competitive advantage in public-sector organizations: explaining the public good/sustainable competitive advantage paradox. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 232-240.
Martinović, M., Pavlić, I., & Šuman Tolić, M. (2017). MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES’QUALITY USING SERVQUAL: THE CASE OF
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
DUBROVNIK. Ekonomska misao i praksa, (2), 593-610.
Wisniewski, M. (1996). Measuring service quality in the public sector: the potential for SERVQUAL. Total Quality Management, 7(4),357-366.Mwita,J.I.(2000),
“Performance management model”, The International Journal ofPublic Sector Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 19-37.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
Philip, G., & Hazlett, S. A. (1997). The measurement of service quality: a new PCP attributes model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 14(3), 260-286.
Ranson, S., & Stewart, J. (1994). Management for the public domain: enabling the learning society. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Rha, J. Y. (2012). Customer satisfaction and qualities in public service: an intermediary customer perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 32(12), 1883-1900.
Rhee, S. K., & Rha, J. Y. (2009). Public service quality and customer satisfaction:
exploring the attributes of service quality in the public sector. The service Industries journal, 29(11), 1491-1512.
Robinson, L. (2003). Committed to quality: the use of quality schemes in UK public leisure services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 13(3), 247-255.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Wisniewski, M. (2001). Using SERVQUAL to assess customer satisfaction with public sector services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 11(6), 380-388.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1988). Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality. Journal of marketing, 52(2), 35-48.
Zeppou, M., & Sotirakou, T. (2003). The “STAIR” model: A comprehensive approach for managing and measuring government performance in the post-modern era. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(4), 320-332.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
二、中文文獻
王耀星，2012。影響都市更新推動成效因素之探討－以台北市都市更新為例。臺 灣師範大學全球經營與策略研究所。
李世雄，2018。影響都市更新事業實施之關鍵因素分析－以台北市中正區某整建 住宅都更案為例。政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班。
杜國源，2008，都市更新、台灣面臨之挑戰，營建知訊，303 期，19-25。
黃泳涵，2009。信任與都市更新參與整合意願之研究，國立政治大學地政研究所 碩士論文。
楊棻糸，1999，都市更新單元規模之研究，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
麥怡安，2009。我國都市更新權利變換制度之研究一以實施者與土地權利人間權 益分配問題為中心。國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
張友怡，1999。私部門辦理都市更新之研究。中興大學都市計畫研究所。
張晏臺，2008。民間辦理都市更新事業遭遇問題之研究－以台北市為例，新竹：
中華大學建築與都市計劃學所碩士論文。
張維修，2012。都市更新不曾發生：台北市的上流化政策分析。建築與城鄉研究 學報，20，63-92
翁美秋，2014。地主參與都市更新意願與期望之調查-以台北市萬華區為例：未 出版碩士論文，中國文化大學環境設計學院建築及都市設計學系，台北.
賴宗炘，2011，〈都市更新課題探討與策略研擬〉，《土地問題研究季刊》，第 10
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
龔福來，2014。民間推動都市更新事業過程中衝突化解之研究。政治大學地政學 系在職專班。
蘇耘，2016 臺灣都市更新政策之發展與困境：以臺北市為例，中興大學國家政策 與公共事務研究所學位論文。
唐雄忠，2018。提升民間推動都市更新重建參與整合意願之研究，華夏科技大學 資產與物業管理系。
董政彰，2003。都市更新實施問題與策略之研究－以新莊市「博士的家」重建計 劃為例。中國文化大學建築與都市計畫研究所。
邊泰明、彭佩瑩、陳玉嬌，2017。信任、互惠與都市更新合作意願相關性之研究。
住宅學報，26-1，1-29。