• 沒有找到結果。

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

59

第五章 結論與展望

由於全球氣候暖化,各國致力減少二氧化碳之排放,紛紛推展電動汽車產業 發展政策。惟車輛生產與貿易過程中,時常因技術及法規差異而形成貿易障礙,

規範差異致使製造商須耗費大量成本及時間遵循各國不同規範,甚至因而不願生 產標準化之車輛至世界各國,對汽車產業發展及貿易形成不利影響。2018 年 3 月 14 日,WP.29 於聯合國第 174 次會議上,通過《EVS-GTR》,其乃由美國、歐盟、

日本與中國共同帶頭制定,為第一個專門規範電動車安全技術之法規,內容主要 針對車輛性能訂有技術性法規,同時也規定電動汽車滿足安全性能要求的試驗方 法,該法目的在於調和國際上不同體系之安全技術法規,具有重要意義,為實踐 組織目標之產物。本文從《TBT 協定》相關條文、TBT 委員會相關決議、爭端解 決機構之報告、WP.29 官方資料等文獻進行研究,分析《EVS-GTR》是否符合

《TBT 協定》下「國際標準」定義,藉此分析該技術性法規能夠達到推展國際貿 易之目的,解決各國電動車安全法規差異衍生之問題,消弭不必要之貿易障礙。

首先於本文第二章,藉由一手官方資料及二手學者研究資料,介紹電動車產 業、相關推動政策與《EVS-GTR》。首先,本章第一節說明電動汽車定義與類型,

以及相關產業推動政策與其衍生之爭議。再者,第二節則開始介紹訂立《EVS-GTR》的組織 WP.29,包含其成立背景、會員資格、職權範圍與組織架構。本章 第三節則完整詳述本文核心規範《EVS-GTR》,從其訂立背景至記述內容作完整 介紹。

本文第三章則透過文獻回顧及WTO 案例研究,分析《TBT 協定》下國際標 準之定義及其構成要件。首先,本章第一節描述《TBT 協定》下國際標準的重要 性,現今國際標準的重要性日漸提升,可為國際貿易帶來正面效果,但何謂「國 際標準」一直未能有明確的答案,故接續藉由《TBT 協定》相關條文、TBT 委員 會相關決議與爭端解決機構之報告等文獻資料分析之。本章第二節介紹《TBT 協 定》下關於國際標準之規定,包含《TBT 協定》第 2.4 條、第 2.5 條、第 2.2 條、

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

60

第5.4 條、附件一第 2 項與附件一第 4 項,另外 TBT 委員會亦有關於國際標準 之提案、討論與決議,其中最重要者為《2000 年 TBT 委員會決議》,該決議之地 位及其揭示的部分原則也在爾後的爭端解決案件中被提及。在本章第三節討論國 際標準相關爭端解決案件,有歐體—沙丁魚案、美國—鮪魚案 II、美國—原產地 標示案與澳洲—菸品素面包裝案,分別從案件事實背景至國際標準構成要件分項 介紹。其中,美國—鮪魚案 II 上訴機構認為,分析國際標準取決於「標準」與

「國際機構」相關定義,澳洲—菸品素面包裝案小組亦引用該見解。澳洲—菸品 素面包裝案小組更進一步針對「標準」要件,區分為六個子要件以檢視系爭措施。

惟部分學者對於爭端解決機構所認定之內容有些許不同見解與建議,如非共識決、

有關於國際標準機構之開放性認定,並建議應加強考量標準的技術內容,並強調 透明性與問責性的重要。

第四章為重點分析章節,探討本文主要問題意識,乃根據前一章所分析之國 際標準定義及構成要件,檢視甫通過之《EVS-GTR》是否符合「國際標準」定義,

以達消弭國際貿易障礙之目的,順利推展電動汽車之國際貿易。據前述分析

《EVS-GTR》有極高機率合致國際標準,惟仍需注意以下四個關於其是否為國際 標準的關鍵要點。其一,若在未來電動車市場發生常見的貿易爭議,在WTO 爭 端解決程序中進行第 2.4 條與第 2.5 條之分析時,《EVS-GTR》相關規定內容模 糊不清而無法清楚釐清規範組成要素,將可能導致其未能真正實質成為重要的國 際標準。其二,雖然《EVS-GTR》之規範內容具有一定程度之明確性與特定性,

但因未能得知《EVS-GTR》之調和後具體成效,包含其是否能有助於為電動車市 場帶來正向的社會利益、能源利益與國家安全利益,以及對電動車貿易有正向影 響,本文雖樂觀看待該規範在電動車市場扮演的角色,惟仍需長期觀察之。其三,

在「《EVS-GTR》是否為國際標準機構所制定及/或採納」方面,應特別注意 WP.29 之開放性與發展面向,如若存在未具國家身份之關稅同盟無法加入 WP.29 之情 況,是否即代表機構不具開放性?其四,WP.29 未明確訂定有關於能力建構與技 術支援之規範,雖其所屬組織有明確提及相關規定,但是否能在汽車領域實踐之

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

61

仍有疑慮。

近年,台灣電動車市場有顯著成長,電動車法規議題同樣逐漸受到關注,如 果《EVS-GTR》可能被視為 TBT 下的國際標準,我國針對電動車訂定相關的技 術性法規時,應盡可能基於《EVS-GTR》,若以後發生爭議時,依照《TBT 協定》, 技術性法規若基於國際標準則合致性較高。另外,即使制定技術性法規時係基於 國際標準,仍應注意《TBT 協定》第 2.1 條、第 2.2 條與其他相關規定,以避免 於貿易時衍生爭議。

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

62

參考文獻

中文部分

書籍

車輛研究測試中心,電動車安全入門,初版,頁11(2015 年)。

林彩瑜,WTO 制度與實務,二版,頁 172(2013 年)。

洪德欽,WTO 法律與政策專題研究,二版,頁 23(2013 年)。

楊培侃,從WTO「澳洲—菸品素面包裝案」論必要性與合理性作為合法政策空 間之衡量標準,收於:楊光華編,第十九屆國際經貿法學發展學術研討會 論文集,頁299(2019 年)。

期刊

陳信志,台灣智慧電動車推動現況與政策方向,車輛研測資訊,104 期,頁 19

(2015 年)。

法律條文

貨物稅條例,第12-3 條。

使用牌照稅法,第5 條。

網際網路

吳湘平,APEC 電動車標準合作促進機制對話會議報導,車安通訊季刊,2014 年,網址:

http://vsccdms.vscc.org.tw/webfile/Epaper/500000152/File/4a03a8db-a28b-4940-ab13-e19850be3706.pdf(最後瀏覽日:2020 年 1 月 4 日)。

吳湘平,第16 屆 APEC 汽車對話會議(Automotive Dialogue)報告,車輛安全審 驗中心,網址:

http://vsccdms.vscc.org.tw/webfile/Epaper/500000083/File/213bdc2b-815d-4690-86fa-e55c81916ffe.pdf(最後瀏覽日:2018 年 10 月 22 日)。

施冠廷,電動車輛電池系統的驗證與測試,車輛研究測試中心,網址:

https://www.artc.org.tw/upfiles/ADUpload/knowledge/tw_knowledge_53008705

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

63

4.pdf(最後瀏覽日:2020 年 1 月 4 日)。

財團法人車輛研究測試中心,電動車法規現況,財團法人車輛研究測試中心,

2012 年,網址:

https://www.artc.org.tw/chinese/03_service/03_02detail.aspx?pid=2115(最後 瀏覽日:2019 年 3 月 20 日)。

陳彥亨、黃敬洲,FMVSS 108 及 E-MARK 法規來源之介紹,車輛研究測試中心,

網 址 :https://www.artc.org.tw/chinese/03_service/03_02detail.aspx?pid=1642

(最後瀏覽日:2018 年 10 月 22 日)。

新華網,我國等牽頭制定的電動汽車安全全球技術法規獲表決通過,新華網,2018 年3 月 21 日,網址:http://www.xinhuanet.com/2018-03/21/c_1122570563.htm

(最後瀏覽日:2019 年 12 月 28 日)。

潘姿羽,禁售燃油車 賴清德:解決空污兼顧能源轉型,中央社,2018 年 5 月 9 日,網址:https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201805090072.aspx(最後瀏覽日:

2020 年 1 月 4 日)。

鄭有青,談電動車觸電安全,車輛研究測試中心,網址:

https://www.artc.org.tw/upfiles/ADUpload/knowledge/tw_knowledge_40192703 1.pdf(最後瀏覽日:2019 年 12 月 27 日)。

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

64

英文部分 書籍

MICHAEL J.TREBILCOCK, ADVANCED INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW

156 (Edward Elgar Publishing ed., 1st ed. 2015).

期刊

Erik Wijkström & Devin Mcdaniels, Improving Regulatory Governance: International

Standards and the WTO TBT Agreement 1033, 47(5) J

OURNAL OF WORLD TRADE

1013 (2013).

Michael A. Livermore, Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation,

Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius, 81 N.Y.U.L.

REV. 766, 795-796 (2006).

Panagiotis Delimatsis, Global Standard-Setting 2.0: How the WTO Spotlights ISO and

Impacts the Transnational Standard-Setting Process 274, 28 D

UKE J.COMP.&

INT'L L.273 (2018).

機構文件

ICTSD,INTERNATIONAL TRADE GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT:THE

EXPANSION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES (2017),

https://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/international-trade-governance-and-sustainable-transport-mahesh-sugathan.pdf.

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and the Health Effects Institute (HEI), State of Global Air 2017: A Special Report on Global Exposure to Air

Pollution and its Disease Burden, HEI,

http://ccacoalition.org/en/resources/state- global-air-2017-special-report-global-exposure-air-pollution-and-its-disease-burden (last visited Mar. 20, 2019).

International Energy Agency (IEA), Global EV Outlook 2018 Towards cross-modal

electrification, 10 OECD/IEA (2018),

https://www.connaissancedesenergies.org/sites/default/files/pdf-actualites/globalevoutlook2018.pdf.

International Energy Agency (IEA), Key CO2 Emission Trends, IEA 7 (2016),

Kiran S. Desai, Electric Vehicles—EU Legal Issues, MAYER BROWN 2(2011), https://m.mayerbrown.com/Files/Publication/e9a77539-8168-4db3-99dd- 270efe5dafa8/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/e3b546d3-b681-4769-85d4-3b090b29932b/10950.pdf.

OECD, The Cost of Air Pollution: Health Impacts of Road Transport, OECD11 (May 21, 2014), https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264210448-en.

UNECE, (China, Japan, the United States of America and the European Union)

Second progress report of the Informal Working Group on Electric Vehicle Safety, at 2, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2014/87 (Aug. 26, 2014),

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2014/wp29/ECE-TRANS-WP29-2014-87e.pdf.

UNECE, (China, Japan, USA and EU) Fourth progress report of the Informal

Working Group on Electric Vehicle Safety, at 2, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2016/30

(Dec. 23, 2015),

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2016/wp29/ECE-TRANS-WP29-2016-030e.pdf.

UNECE, (European Union, Japan and United States of America) Proposal for

Establishment of Two Informal Working Groups Addressing the Safety and Environmental Requirements for Electric Vehicles to Enhance Regulatory Cooperation Including Developing Global Technical Regulations in the Framework of the 1998 Agreement, at 2, WP.29-155-38 (Nov. 18, 2011),

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/WP29-155-38e.pdf.

UNECE, (representatives of the European Union, Japan and United States of

America) Proposal for establishing two informal working groups addressing the safety and environmental requirements for electric vehicles to enhance

regulatory cooperation including developing global technical regulations in the framework of the 1998 Agreement, at 7, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/36 (Dec 26,

1011), https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2012/wp29/ECE-TRANS-WP29-2012-36e.pdf.

UNECE, (USA) Terms of Reference of the Informal Working Group on Electric

Vehicle Safety, at 2, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/121 (July 24, 2012),

UNECE, Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions for Periodical

Technical Inspections of Wheeled Vehicles and the Reciprocal Recognition of such Inspections, at 4, ECE/RCTE/CONF/4 (Nov. 13, 1997),

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/199 7agr/conf4efr.pdf.

UNECE, Agreement Concerning the Establishment of Global Technical Regulations

for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled Vehicles, at 6-10, ECE/TRANS/132 (June 25, 1998),

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp 29glob/tran132.pdf.

UNECE, Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations

Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of these United Nations Regulations, at 8-9, E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3 (Oct. 20, 2017),

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29regs/2017/E-ECE-TRANS-505-Rev.3e.pdf.

UNECE, Concerning the Common Definitions of Vehicle Categories, Masses and

Dimensions (S.R. 1), at 14, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1137 (Sept. 15, 2005),

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2005/wp29/TRANS-WP29-1045e.pdf.

UNECE, Global Technical Regulation on the Electric Vehicle Safety (EVS), at 1, ECE/TRANS/180/Add.20 (May 3, 2018),

http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp2 9registry/ECE-TRANS-180a20e.pdf.

UNECE,

Reports of the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations on its 174th Session, Reports of the Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement on its sixty-eighth Session, Reports of the Executive Committee of the 1998 Agreement on its fifty-second Session, Reports of the Administrative Committee of the 1997 Agreement on its eleventh Session,

¶134 (Apr. 13, 2018),

http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2018/wp29/ECE-TRANS-WP.29-1137e.pdf.

UNECE, Reports of the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations on its

155th session, Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement on its forty-ninth session, Executive Committee of the 1998 Agreement on its thirty-third, session, Administrative Committee of the 1997 Agreement on its ninth session, ¶

141, at 25, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1093 (Dec. 16, 2011),

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2011/wp29/ECE-TRANS-WP29-1093e.pdf.

UNECE, World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29), Terms of

Reference and Rules of Procedure, at 4, TRANS/WP.29/690 (Nov. 18, 1999),

https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/tor/tor_wp29_TRANS-WP.29-690e.pdf.

UNECE, World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29), How it

Works, How to Join it, at 3, ECE/TRANS/NONE/2012/1 (2012),

http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp2

Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, Apr. 15, 1994, 1868 U.N.T.S. 120.

Codex Alimentarius Comm’n, Codex Stan 1-1985 General Standard for the Labelling

of Prepackaged Foods, art. 4.5 (1985).

Codex Alimentarius Comm’n, Codex Stan 94-1981 Standard for Canned Sardines and Sardine-type Products, art. 6.1 (1978).

Codex Alimentarius Commission, Procedural Manual, art. 10.2 (2001).

Council Regulation (EEC) 2136/89, of 21 June 1989 Laying Down Common Marketing Standards for Preserved Sardines, art. 2, 1989 O.J. (L 212) 79, 79.

Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1385 (1990); 50 C.F.R. §§

216.91, 216.92 (2000).

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

68

Int’l Org. for Standardization & Int’l Electrotechnical Comm’n, ISO/IEC Directives,

Part 1, art. 2.7.3 (2015).

Int’l Org. for Standardization & Int’l Electrotechnical Comm’n, ISO/IEC Guide 2:

1991 Standardization and related activities—General Vocabulary (1991), § 3.2.

Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization art. 9.1, Apr. 15, 1994 1867 U.N.T.S. 154, 33 I.L.M. 1144 (1994).

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, art. 31.3(a), May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S.

331.

World Health Org., Constitution of the World Health Organization, art. 60.b (2006).

World Org. for Animal Health, General Rules of the World Organization for Animal

Health, art. 50 (2011).

WTO 小組報告

Panel Report, Australia — Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical

Indications and Other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging, WTO Doc. WT/DS435/R, WT/DS441/R,

WT/DS458/R, WT/DS467/R (adopted Aug. 27, 2018).

Panel Report, European Communities—Trade Description of Sardines, WTO Doc.

WT/DS231/R (adopted Oct. 23, 2002) [hereinafter EC—Sardines].

Panel Report, United States—Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL)

Requirements, WTO Doc. WT/DS384/R, WT/DS386/R (adopted July 23, 2012)

[hereinafter US—COOL].

Panel Report, United States—Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and

Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products, WTO Doc. WT/DS381/R (adopted June 13,

2012) [hereinafter US—Tuna II].

WTO 上訴機構報告

Appellate Body Report, EC—Sardines, WTO Doc. WT/DS231/AB/R (adopted Oct. 23, 2002).

Appellate Body Report, European Communities—Measures Affecting Asbestos and

Products Containing Asbestos, ¶ 67, WTO Doc. WT/DS135/AB/R (adopted Apr.

5, 2001).

Appellate Body Report, United States—Sunset Reviews of Anti-Dumping Measures on

Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina, ¶ 187, WTO Doc. WT/DS268/AB/R

(adopted Dec. 17, 2004).

Appellate Body Report, US—Tuna II, WTO Doc. WT/DS381/AB/R (adopted June 13, 2012).

WTO 其他文件

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Decision of the Committee on Principles

for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations with Relation to Articles 2, 5 and Annex 3 of the Agreement, Second Triennial

Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, Annex 4, WTO Doc. G/TBT/9 (Nov. 13, 2002).

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Decisions and Recommendations adopted

by the WTO committee on Technical Barriers to Trade since 1 January 1995, at

16, G/TBT/1/Rev. 12 (Jan. 21, 2015).

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Issues Concerning International Standards

and International Stnadardization Bodies, ¶ 4, WTO Doc. G/TBT/W/113 (June

15, 1999).

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting Held on 1 October

1999, ¶¶ 54-55, WTO Doc. G/TBT/M/17, (Nov. 12, 1999).

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, On the Conditions for the Acceptance and

Use of International Standards in the Context of the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, ¶ 4, WTO Doc. G/TBT/W/87/Rev. 1 (Sep. 30, 1999).

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Transparency in International Standards

Draft U.S. Proposal for a Decision, ¶ 1, WTO Doc. G/TBT/W/75/Rev.1 (June

17, 1999).

網際網路

Clean Energy Ministerial, About the Clean Energy Ministerial, CLEAN ENERGY

MINISTERIAL, http://www.cleanenergyministerial.org/about-clean-energy-ministerial (last visited Mar. 20, 2019).

‧ 國

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

70

Codex Alimentarius Commission, Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), CODEX

ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION,

http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/committees/cac/about/en/ (last visited Dec. 25, 2019).

Simon Flowers, How Will the Electric Vehicle Market Rev Up?, FORBES (July 27, 2018),

Simon Flowers, How Will the Electric Vehicle Market Rev Up?, FORBES (July 27, 2018),

相關文件