• 沒有找到結果。

Layout Implementation and Simulation Result

Chapter 5 The Implementation of Frequency Synthesizer

5.4 Layout Implementation and Simulation Result

In this section, we will show the layout and simulation result of our ADPLL design. In the layout implementation phase, we should take care about the floor plan first, then, also consider the shape of each block, as well as the matching and

Fig. 5-10 and Fig. 5-11 show the layout implementation and floor plan respectively. The main signal path among these building blocks in ADPLL is roughly counterclockwise, in this way we can place these blocks compactly. Fig. 5-12 shows the area occupation ratio of each building block in ADPLL; 32% of the overall area is for DCO and its replica delay element, 56% for control unit, and 12% for PFD. With regard to power-consumption distribution in the ADPLL, as shown in Fig. 5-13, because of the high operating frequency of DCO, the DCO and its replica circuit dissipate a large part of total power dissipation in spite of their smaller area occupation than all of other circuits in the ADPLL.

Fig.5-10 Layout of the ADPLL

Fig.5-11 Floor Plan of the ADPLL

Area Distribution

PFD 12%

Control Unit 56%

DCO (+replica)

32%

Fig.5-12 Area Distribution of the ADPLL

Power Consumption Distribution (@ 1GHz)

DCO (+replica) 58%

PFD 7%

Control Unit 35%

Fig.5-13 Power-Consumption Distribution of the ADPLL

Thereupon, we will present the overall simulation results with different operating frequency, and the input reference clock frequency is always set as 50 MHz. Fig. 5-14, Fig. 5-15, Fig. 5-16, Fig. 5-17, Fig. 5-18, and Fig. 5-19 show the lock process of ADPLL in output clock of 300 M, 400 M, 500 M, 600 M, 850 M, and 1-GHz respectively. Each figure includes three sub-figures, they are the overall lock process, the zoom in of lock process, and the locked state of ADPLL individually.

Besides, within each sub-figure, there are four main signals are shown: the reference clock, DCO output clock, LOCK signal, and value of DCO control word.

The reference clock is from the matched delay clock of the input reference signal.

Fig.5-14 (a) The overall lock process of 300MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-14 (c) The locked state of 300MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-15 (a) The overall lock process of 400MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-15 (b) The zoom in of lock process of 400MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-16 (a) The overall lock process of 500MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-16 (b) The zoom in of lock process of 500MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-16 (c) The locked state of 500MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-17 (a) The overall lock process of 600MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-17 (b) The zoom in of lock process of 600MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-17 (c) The locked state of 600MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-18 (a) The overall lock process of 850MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-18 (b) The zoom in of lock process of 850MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-18 (c) The locked state of 850MHz target frequency.

Fig.5-19 (a) The overall lock process of 1GHz target frequency.

Fig.5-19 (b) The zoom in of lock process of 1GHz target frequency.

Fig.5-19 (c) The locked state of 1GHz target frequency.

14

300 400 500 600 850 1000

operating freq.(MHz)

lock cycle

Fig.5-20 Lock cycle VS. operating frequency

0

300 400 500 600 850 1000

operationg freq.(MHz)

jitter(p-p, psec)

Fig.5-21 Jitter VS. operating frequency

0

300 400 500 600 850 1000

operating freq.(MHz)

power dissipation(mW)

Fig.5-22 Power dissipation VS. operating frequency

Finally, Fig. 5-20, Fig. 5-21, and Fig. 5-22 present performance summaries of the ADPLL-based frequency synthesizer in different operating frequency. As shown in Table 5-2, compare to other ADPLL circuit design, our ADPLL owns the largest frequency range and the monotonicity characteristic due to the new DCO design. In addition, our ADPLL needs the smallest area and power cost because of its simplicity, and also has the fewer lock cycles by using the modified PFD.

Table 5-2 Performance comparison of ADPLL

Design JSSC04 [3] JSSC03 [23] JSSC03 [28] This Work

Chapter 6

Conclusion and Future Work

6.1 Conclusion

In this thesis, an ADPLL-based frequency synthesizer with low power and area cost, wide frequency range, and short lock cycle is proposed.

A DCO with features of wide frequency range, and low power consumption is proposed. By using the new type digitally controlled delay element (DCDE), a digitally controlled oscillator (DCO) with characteristics of its monotonicity is presented, which makes the DCO design more straightforward. In addition, compared with the conventional architecture, a dual-mode one-cycle PFD used to reduce the lock cycle time is also presented.

Table 6-1. Performance Summary of the Frequency Synthesizer ADPLL-based Frequency Synthesizer

Reference clock 50MHz

Output Clock Frequency 300MHz / 400MHz / 500MHz / 600MHz / 850MHz / 1GHz

Jitter (p-p) 46ps @ 1GHz

120ps @ 300MHz (worst case) Locked time <=16 input cycles

Power consumption 3.1mW @ 1GHz

Area 100um x 120um

Supply voltage 1.2V

Process TSMC 0.13um CMOS process

DCO

Frequency Range 260MHz ~ 1.15GHz

Resolution 11bits (0.4ps ~ 20ps / LSB)

Power consumption 0.9mW @ 1GHz

In conclusion, with the specification, the proposed ADPLL-based frequency synthesizer is suitable for high speed clock generation in high speed DSPs applications.

6.2 Future Work

In the recent year, low power is a more and more important issue in circuit design. However, most techniques to reduce power dissipation of integrated circuits are to choose system and circuit parameters at design time. In fact, in some applications, it is a more efficiency way of adjusting the circuit during operation, such as: voltage scaling or lowering the operating clock frequency. The related control schemes have been proposed in [24]-[27].

To reduce the power dissipation, it usually needs different voltage or frequency in a low power system. Hence, in our future work, we can take advantage of the adaptive voltage scaling (AVS) scheme in our ADPLL to decrease the power

provide several different supply voltage for the DCO, which consumes a great part of the total power dissipation in the ADPLL. Therefore, by scaling down the supply voltage of DCO, we can save much power dissipation while still meeting the same specification.

S300M S400M S500M S600M S850M S1-G

PFD

Fig.6-1 The ADPLL with AVS

Reference

[1] Behzad Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits, Boston:

McGraw-Hill, 2001.

[2] T. Olsson, and P. Nilsson, “A digital PLL made from standard cell,” in Proc.

15th ECCTD, pp. 277-280, 2001.

[3] T. Olsson, and P. Nilsson, “A digitally controlled PLL for SoC applications,”

IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 39, pp. 751 - 760, May 2004.

[4] R. E. Best, Phase-Locked Loops: Theory, Design and Applications, 2nd ed.

New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.

[5] J. Dunning, G. Garcia, J. Lundberg, and E. Nuckolls, “An all-digital phase-locked loop with 50-cycle lock time suitable for high-performance microprocessors,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, pp. 412–422, Apr.

1995.

[6] J.-S. Chiang, and K.-Y. Chen, “A 3.3 V all digital phase-locked loop with small DCO hardware and fast phase lock,” in ISCAS, vol. 3, pp. 554–557, 1998.

[7] Eric Pascal Roth, “All-Digital Standard-Cell Based Audio Clock Synthesis,”

Ph.D Dissertation of ETH, No. 15667, E.E. Department, Zurich, Swiss, 2004

[8] F. M. Gardner,” Phase-lock Techniques,” 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY 1979.

[9] J. Craninckx, M. Steyaert, ”Wireless CMOS Frequency Synthesizer Design,”

Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

[10] D. C. Cox and R. P. Leek, “Component signal separation and recombination for linear amplification with nonlinear components,” IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 23, pp.1281-1287, Nov. 1975.

[11] J. Craninckx, M. Steyaert, “Low-noise voltage-controlled oscillators using enhanced LC-tanks,” IEEE Trans. On Circuit and System II, vol. 42, no. 12, Dec. 1995.

[12] Paul Gray, Iasson F. Vassiliou, “Top-Down Design of a Phase Locked Loop For a Video Driver System,” University of California at Berkeley master thesis.

[13] M. Saint-Laurent and M. Swaminathan, “A digitally adjustable resistor for path delay characterization in high frequency microprocessors,” in Proc. Southwest Symp. Mixed-Signal Design, 2001, pp. 61–64.

[14] M. Maymandi-Nejad and M. Sachdev, “A digitally programmable delay element: Design and analysis,” IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Syst., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 871–878, Oct. 2003.

[15] M. Maymandi-Nejad, and M. Sachdev, “A monotonic digitally controlled delay element” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 2212-2219, Nov.

2005.

[16] Behzad Razavi, RF Microelectronics, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.

[17] R. G. Meyer, R. Eschenbach, and W. M. Edgerley, ”A Wideband Feedforward Amplifier,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 9, pp. 422-488, Dec. 1974.

[18] E. E. Eid, F. M. Ghannouchi, and F. Beauregard, “Optimal Feedforward Linearization System Design,” Microwave J., pp. 78-86, November 1995.

[19] Amr M. Fahim, ”A Compact, Low-Jitter Digital PLL,” in Proc. IEEE ESSCIRC, pp. 101-104, Sep. 2003.

[20] T.-Y Hsu and C.-Y Lee, ”An All-Digital Phase-Locked Loop (ADPLL)-Based Clock Recovery Circuit,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 34, no. 8, pp.

1063-1073, Aug. 1999.

[21] T.-Y Hsu C.-C Wang, and C.-Y Lee, ”Design and Analysis of a Portable High-Speed Clock Generator,” IEEE Trans. Circuit and Syst. , Analog and Digital Signal Processing, Vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1574-1581, Oct. 2001.

[22] Pao-Lung Chen, “The Study of Portable Digitally Controlled Oscillator and Dynamic Frequency Counting Loop,” Ph.D Dissertation of Institute of Electronics Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.

O. C., Nov. 2005.

[23] C.-C Chung and C.-Y Lee, ”An All-Digital Phase-Locked Loop for High-speed Clock Generation,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 347-351, Feb. 2003.

[24] P. Macken et al., “A voltage reduction technique for digital systems,” in IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf. Dig. Tech. Papers, Feb. 1990, pp.238–239.

[25] S. Sakiyama et al., “A lean power management technique: The lowest power consumption for the given operating speed of LSIs,” in Symp. VLSI Circuits Dig. Tech. Papers, June 1997, pp. 99–100.

[26] K. Suzuki et al., “A 300 MIPS/W RISC core processor with variable supply-voltage scheme in variable threshold-voltage CMOS,” in Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf. (CICC), May 1997, pp.587–590.

[27] T. Burd et al., “A dynamic voltage scaled microprocessor system,” in IEEE Int.

Solid-State Circuits Conf. Dig. Tech. Papers, Feb. 2000, pp. 294–295.

[28] J. G. Maneatis, J. Kim, I. McClatchie, J. Maxey and M.

Shankarards, ”Self-Biased High-Bandwith Low-Jitter 1-to-4096 Multiplier Clock Generator PLL,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 38, no. 11, pp.

1795-1803, Nov. 2003.

Vita

PERSONAL INFORMATION Birth Date: January. 04, 1981 Birth Place: Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Address: Department of Electronics Engineering National Chiao Tung University 1001 Ta-Hsueh Road

Hsin-chu, Taiwan 30010, R.O.C.

E-Mail Address: ujcc.ee92g@nctu.edu.tw

EDUCATION

B.S. [2003] Department of Electronical Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University.

M.A. [2006] Institute of Electronics, National Chiao-Tung University.

相關文件