公務人員考試錄取人員基礎訓練成效研究－以高等考試三級考試一般行政為例 - 政大學術集成

全文

(1)立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. 108. 4. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(2) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(3) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2019. 4. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.


(5) 立. Baldwin & Ford. 政治大. 104. 106. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Baldwin & Ford. Kirkpatrick. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.


(7) ................................................................................................................................ i. ......................................................................................................................... iii. .......................................................................................................................... iv. .............................................................................................................. 1 ........................................................................................................ 1 ............................................................................................ 4. 政治大 ...................................................................... 10. ............................................................................................ 6. 立. ‧ 國. 學. ...................................................................................................... 15 ................................................................................................... 17. ‧. .............................................................................................. 17. y. Nat. al. ..................................................................................34. er. io. sit. ..............................................................................................24. n. v i n Ch ..............................................................................................................57 engchi U ................................................................................................... 59 .............................................................. 59 ...................................................................................................... 64 ...................................................................................................... 66 .......................................................................................... 68 ......................................................................................... 71 ........................................................ 71 ........................................................................ 85 i. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(8) ........................................................ 95 ...................................................................... 101 ...................................................................... 110 .................................................................. 117 ............................................................................................ 127 ...................................................................................................... 127 .......................................................................................... 131 .......................................................................... 134. 政治大 ........................................................................................................ 140 立. ‧ 國. 學. ........................................................................................................ 148 .................................... 162. ‧. ....................................................................................... 169. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. ................................................................ 172. Ch. engchi. ii. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(9) 1. ................................................................................... 33. 2. ............................................................................... 45. 3. ................................................... 63. 4. ................................................................................................... 67. 5. ............................................................................................... 72. 6. ............................................................................................. 125. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. iii. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(10) 1. ....................................................................................................... 15. 2. ............................................................................................... 21. 3. Brinkerhoff. ........................................................................... 28. 4. Tracey, Tannenbaum & Kavanagh. 5. Tracey & Tewa. 6. Xiao. 7. Baldwin. ........................................................................ 42 ...................................................................................... 44 52 治政 .................................................................. 大 ....................................................................................... 56 立. Ford. 8. ....................................................................... 61. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 9. .......................................... 40. Ch. engchi. iv. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(11) 立. Goldstein, 1986; Goldstein, 1992; Noe, 2006. ‧ 國. 學. 「. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 1999. 政治大. Ch. n U engchi. iv. 2006. 、. 2006. 1999 9. 1. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(12) 12. 2012. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. 2006. ‧. n. al. y. er. io. sit. Nat. 2011. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. double blind. 2003. 2005 2. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(13) 1. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. e2010 ngchi. i n U. v. Farazman 2009. Chlivickas, 2010. 1. 20. 3. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(14) 2013. 2005. 2016. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. 2010. ‧ er. io. sit. y. Nat. 三i v. n. al. Ch. n U engchi. Donald L. Kirkpatrick. 1959 「. 4. 、. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(15) 「. Kirkpatrick, 2006 Newstorm, 1978 2011. 99. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Baldwin. Ford. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 1988. 2006 Noe & Schmitt, 1986; Baldwin & Ford, 1988 5. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(16) Ford & Weissbein, 1997. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat Bogdan. ‧. 三. Biklen 2007. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2018 68. 6. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(17) Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Bryman, 1999; Bogdan & Biklen, 2007. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat Grbich, 2013. McMillan & Schumacher, 2009;. 2018 90. Ch. engchi. 7. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(18) Bogdan. 2018. 立. Biklen 2007. 96. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. literature review. engchi. i n U. v. semi-structured interviews semi-standardized interviews — 8. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(19) 2003. mixed-method research. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治、大. ‧ er. io. sit. y. Nat. n. a l 2013 478 v i n Ch engchi U Creswell & Plano Clark, 2006. 9. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(20) 已. Kirkpatrick. 已 Kirkpatrick. 立. ‧ 國. ‧. Kirkpatrick. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 2010. 學. 1995. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Arthur, Bennett, Edens & Bell, 2003. 2007. 10. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(21) Kirkpatrick 1996 2008. 2008. 2011 2001. Kirkpatrick. 立. 政治大. 2008. 96. 學 ‧. ‧ 國. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 2003. 2001. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2011. Kirkpatrick. 11. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(22) 2013. 2000. 2007 2010. 已. 政治大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. Kirkpatrick. sit. 2015. n. er. io. al. y. ‧. Nat. 2012. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2007. 2010. 2009. 362. 12. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(23) 政治大. 2015. 102. ‧. 2021. 學. 1616. io. n. al. Ch. engchi. sit. y. Nat. 2014. er. 2014. ‧ 國. 立. i n U. v. 2015. 13. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(24) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 14. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(25) 1. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 1. 15. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.


(27) 主. 已也. 立. 政治大 KSA. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 已也. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2000. Goldstein, 1992 2000 2003. 17. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(28) —. 412 2002. 立. io. sit. y. Nat. 已也. 1999. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 2000. 政治大. n. al. er. 1991. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. McGehee & Thayer, 1961; DeSimone & Harris, 1998. Van Wart, Cayer & Cook, 1993. 18. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(29) 2000. 立. Goldstein 1992. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. KSAs. i n U. v. 1999. know-how 2000. 19. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(30) Goldstein 1986. 2002. 2000. McGehee. Thayer 1961. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. KSAs. 政治大. KSAs. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2002. Ch. engchi KSAs. competency. 2000 22-25. i n U. KSAs. v. 三. Knowles, 1970. KSAs. McClelland. 20. 1970. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(31) McClelland, 1973 Boyatzis, 1982; Mirabile, 1997 Spencer & Spencer 1993. 2003. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. intent. characteristic ●. Ch. e naction gchi. behavior. i n U. v. outcome. job performance. ●. ● ● ● 2 Spencer & Spencer 1993: 13. 21. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(32) Parry, 1998. 2010. KSAs. 立. 乙. 政治大. KSAs. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Goldstein, 1998. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2000 26-27 22. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(33) 2002 1997 2002. 2006 meta-competence. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. KSAs. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2014. 2006 2014. 23. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(34) 已. Kirkpatrick. 已. …. Clegg, 1987. 學. Snyder, Raben & Farr, 1980. Worthen & Sanders, 1987. ‧. 1983. 政治大. ‧ 國. 立. 三. 1995. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Stufflebeam, 1966. Phillips, 1991; Bramley, 1996. Ch. engchi. Phillips 1983. i n U. Hamblin, 1974;. v. 1994. 2001. 24. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(35) ISD instructional system design. —. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 已. Warr, Bird & Rackham CIPP. CIRO. Brinkerhoff Phillips. Stufflebeam Bushnell. ROI. IPO Kirkpatrick. 25. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(36) Warr, Bird & Rackham. CIRO. Warr, Bird & Rackham. 1970. CIRO Burden & Proctor, 2000. 1.. 2. 3.. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 2.. n. al. Stufflebeam. CIPP. er. io Stufflebeam. sit. y. Nat. 「. 4.. Ch. engchi. 1971. i n U. 1. 3.. v. CIPP. CIRO. 26. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(37) 1.. 2.. 3.. Brinkerhoff Brinkerhoff 1988. Kirkpatrick. Brinkerhoff. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. al. 1998. n. 2000. sit. io. 3. er. Nat. y. Brinkerhoff 1988. 163-166. Ch. engchi. 27. i n U. 354. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(38) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al 3. Ch. engchi. v. Brinkerhoff 2000. Bushnell. i n U. 165. IPO. Bushnell 1990. IBM IPO. 28. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(39) 、. Bushnell. ROI. 立. ‧ 國. ROI. 2000. ‧. io. sit. Nat. ROI. y. 166-168. Kirkpatrick. 學. Phillips 1997. n. al. er. Phillips. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Kirkpatrick. 1989 29. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(40) Clegg, 1987. Kirkpatrick. 1998. Anderson & Ball, 1978. Kirkpatrick, 1959; Stufflebeam, 1966; Hamblin, 1974; Galvin, 1983; Bushnell, 1990; Kraiger, Ford & Salas, 1993; Holton, 1996; Phillips, 1997; Brinkerhoff, 1998; Nickoles,. 學. ‧ 國. 2012. ‧. io. sit. y. Nat. Phillips 1991. n. al. er. 2005. 治政大 Donald L. Kirkpatrick 立. Ch. engchi. 30. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(41) Kirkpatrick. 1994. Warr et al., 1999. & Salas, 1993. 立. Kirkpatrick Kraiger, Ford. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 Alliger et al., 1997. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. io. Kirkpatrick 1994. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Kirkpatrick, 2006. 31. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(42) Kirkpatrick, 2006. 立. 治政大 1995. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Kirkpatrick. y. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. —. Ch. Kirkpatrick. engchi. i n U. 2010. v. 1. 32. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(43) 1. 1.. 2. 1.. 1.. 3. 4. 5.. 2.. 2.. 、. 6.. 7. 8. 9.. 立. 3.. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. · 10.. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 33. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(44) — 2000. 153-154. 已. 政治大. 立. 學. …. 三. ‧. 已. ‧ 國. Baldwin & Ford. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2003. Ch. i n U. Kirkpatrick. engchi. v. Baldwin & Ford, 1988; Phillips, 1991. Laker 1990. 34. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(45) Olivero, Bane & Kopelman, 1997. 2014. Kasim. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. 2016. 立. Ali 2011. Baldwin. Ford 1988. ‧ Mathieu Tannenbaum. n. al. Ch. engchi. Salas 1992. er. io. Sundram & Othman, 2013. sit. y. Nat. Velada, Caetano, Michel, Lyons & Kavanagh, 2007; Bhatti, Battour,. i n U. v. 2010. 35. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(46) 已. 2013. Holton, 1996; Mathieu et al., 1992; Noe & Schmitt, 1986; Salas & Cannon-Bowers, 2001. 2006. 立. 2016b. 政治大. 2013a. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. n. al. er. io. sit. y. 「. Ch. engchi. 36. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(47) implicit knowledge. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. Ch. engchi. er. io. al. sit. y. Nat. 2013. i n U. v. Blume, Ford, Baldwin, & Huang, 2010; Broad & Newstrom, 1992; Mathis & Jackson, 2008. 2012. Grossman & Salas, 2011. Baldwin & Ford, 1988; Robinson & Robinson, 1995; Wexley & Latham, 2002; Alan 37. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(48) & Monica, 2006; Kasim & Ali, 2011. Broad & Newstrom. 1992. 2016. 已. 立. Tracey & Tewa. 治 Tannenbaum & Kavanagh 政 Tracey, 大 Xiao. ‧ 國. 學. Tracey, Tannenbaum & Kavanagh. ‧. Tracey, Tannenbaum & Kavanagh. 1995. n. al. LISREL. Ch. 52. er. io. sit. y. Nat 505. 4. engchi. i n U. v. Tracey, Tannenbaum & Kavanagh, 1995. Hellreigel & Slocum, 1974; James & Jones, 1974; Schneider 1983. 38. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(49) Schneider 1985. Rouiller & Goldstein 1993. Rouiller & Goldstein 1993. 立. Rouiller. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Goldstein. 政治大. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. i n U. Dubin, 1990; Noe & Ford, 1992; Rosow & Zager, 1988. Ch. engchi. v. Rosow & Zager, 1988 Dubin, 1990. Dubin, 1990 Kozlowski & Hults, 1987. 39. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(50) Rosow & Zager, 1988. — Schein, 1985. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 4. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Tracey, Tannenbaum & Kavanagh. Tracey, Tannenbaum & Kavanagh 1995: 274. Tracey & Tewa Tracey & Tewa 1995. 21. 40. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(51) 5. Tracey & Tewa, 1995: 39-42. 1.. 2.. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 3.. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Mathieu Tannenbaum. & Salas 1992. 1.. 1 2. 3 4. 41. 5. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(52) 2.. 1. 「 2. 3 4. 3.. 1 2 3. 4 5. 政治大. 立. ‧ 國. •. •. y. Nat. io. sit. • •. n. al. er. •. •. ‧. •. 學. •. C •h •. engchi. i n U. v. •. • • • 5. Tracey & Tewa. Tracey & Tewa. 1995: 39. 42. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(53) Xiao Xiao 1996. 2004. Xiao. 6. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. KSA. KSA. KSA. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2. KSA. ‧. 1.. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 3.. 4.. 5.. 43. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(54) Xiao 1.. O. Y. X X. F TA OC MC RC SC PC WC. X. F TA. OC. KSA. MC. RC. 政治 SC大. 立. WC. OC MC RC SC PC WC. TA. 學. PC. ‧ 國. X. ‧. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 2.. KSA. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. KSA. MC. OC. RC. TA. SC. PC WC. 6. Xiao. Xiao 1996: 59 44. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(55) 2. 2. 1.. 1980 Huczynski. 2.. & Lewis. 立. 1.. Nat. io. sit. y. 2.. n. al. er. Schmitt. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 1986 Noe &. 3.. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 3.. 4.. 5. 6. 7.. 45. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(56) 1.. 1988 Baldwin & Ford. 2.. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 1.. sit. y. Nat. 1995 Tracey,. n. al. er. io. Tannenbaum & Kavanagh. 3.. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2.. 1.. 1995 Tracey & Tews 46. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(57) 2.. 1.. 1996 Xiao KSA. 立. 4.. ‧ 國. 5. 1.. ‧. 」. 3.. 政治大. 學. 1996. 2. KSA. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2.. 3.. 1.. 1998 Gregoire, Propp & Poertner 47. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(58) 2.. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 1.. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2004. 3.. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2.. 3.. 48. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(59) 1.. 2005. 2. 3.. 立. 1.. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 2006. 政治大. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. 2.. v. 3.. 1.. 2013. 2.. 49. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(60) 3.. 2018. 立. 1.. 政治大. 2.. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 3.. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Baldwin & Ford. 50. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(61) Baldwin & Ford. 已. Baldwin & Ford 1988. 政治大. 7. 立. Bass & Vaughan, 1966. ‧ 國. 學. Gagne, 1962; Tracy, 1984. Campbell, 1971;. Ford & Wroten, 1984. ‧. Baldwin & Ford. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 6 4 5 1. 2. 3. Baldwin & Ford, 1988. 51. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(62) •. 4. •. 2. •. • •. 1. 6. •. •. 立. •. 政3治大 5. Baldwin. Ford. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 7. Baldwin & Ford 1988: 65. Baldwin & Ford, 1988. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat —. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Robinson, 1984; Trost, 1982. Ghiselli 1966. Noe. Schmitt 1986 Baumgartel Reynolds 52. Pathan. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(63) 1984. Ryman Biersner 1975 Hicks. Noe. Klimoski 1987. Schmitt 1986 Baumgartel. 立. 1984. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Eden & Ravid, 1982; Eden & Shani, 1982. post-training interventions. Wexley. sit. Nemeroff. n. al. er. io Reber. y. Nat. 1975. Eden. Wallin 1984. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Gagne, 1962. identical elements. 53. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(64) Thorndike & Woodworth, 1901. McGehee & Thayer, 1961 stimulus variability Ellis, 1965 Shore. Sechrest 1961. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Briggs & Naylor, 1962; Naylor & Briggs, 1963. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. io. Naylor & Briggs, 1963 Wexley & Thornton, 1972. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Eddy, Glad & Wilkins, 1967 Baumgartel. , Baumgartel & Jeanpierre, 1972;. Baumgartel et al., 1984; Baumgartel, Sullivan & Dunn, 1978 Slocum 1973. Hand Richards. 18. 54. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(65) Huczynski. Lewis 1980. Fleishman, 1953; House, 1968 Huczynski & Lewis 1980. —. Baldwin & Ford. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大. 8. Baldwin & Ford, 1988. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 1. A. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2. B. 55. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(66) 3. C. 4. D. 5. E. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 8 Baldwin & Ford 1988: 97 56. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(67) Kirkpatrick. 立. 政治大. 1988. ‧. Baldwin & Ford. 學. ‧ 國. Baldwin & Ford. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. —. Kirkpatrick. Baldwin & Ford. 57. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.


(69) Creswell, 2002. 立. Babbie, 2013. 政「治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. al. n 、. Ch. engchi. i n U 75. 3. 2. 3. 已. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 手. 2. v. 1 21. 3. 3. 21. 59. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(70) 5 103. —. 8. 23. 19. 86 4. — 5. 6. 立. —. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 4. 3. 5. 6. 6. 10. i n U. v. 、. 60. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(71) 1998. 5. 2006 9. 立. 政2003治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 9 2013 61. 61. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(72) …. 2013. 立. 政治大 2013. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 21. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 62. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(73) 乙 106. 8. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 3. 17. 3. Ch. engchi. 63. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(74) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 乙 Baldwin & Ford 1988. 64. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(75) 「 Baldwin & Ford 1988. Huczynski & Lewis,1980; Noe & Schmitt, 1986; Baldwin & Ford,. 治政大& Poertner,1998 1988; Tracey & Tewa, 1995; Xiao, 1996; Gregoire, Propp 立 ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. sit. n. al. er. 2015. io. 2014. Nat. —. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 、. 65. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(76) Baldwin & Ford. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 「. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Kirkpatrick 2006 104. 106. 107. 66. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(77) snowball sampling. 12. 立. 11. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. io. y. sit. Nat. 4. n. al. er. 4. 107. 政治大. Ch. e26~30 ngchi. A. 11. B. 11. 21~25. C. 9. 21~25. D. 1. 1 21~25. i n U. v. 、 67. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(78) E. 9. 21~25. F. 1. 9 26~30. G. 1. 11 26~30. H. 1. 11 26~30. I. 立2. 。. 、. 政治大 1 21~25. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. 。. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. 三. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 、. 2002 22-23. 68. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(79) 手 1.. —. 2.. —. 3.. —. 4.. —. 已. 立. —. ‧ 國. 6.. ‧. —. 學. 5.. 政治大. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 已. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 1.. 2.. 3.. 69. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(80) 4.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.. 1.. y. sit er. al. n. 7.. io. 6.. Nat. 5.. ‧. 4.. ‧ 國. 3.. 學. 2.. 立. 政治大. Ch. engchi. 70. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(81) Kirkpatrick. Baldwin & Ford 1988. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n 。. Ch. 已. engchi U. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. v 三上 i n. 、 5. 1. 71. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(82) 5. 4.11. 3.89 2.67 3.00. 3.22 4.33 4.11. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. ‧. 4.00. sit. y. 4.22. n. al. er. 2.78. io. 2.67. 2.78. 學 4.56. Nat. 2.11. 2.00 2.22. 5. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 1.. 3.67. 0.50. 2.78. 0.83. 3.78. 0.83. 2.. 3.78. 0.67. 2.78. 1.09. 3.56. 0.73. 3.. 3.56. 0.53. 3.00. 0.87. 3.44. 0.88. 4.. 3.67. 0.87. 3.22. 1.09. 4.00. 0.87. 5.. 4.11. 1.05. 3.00. 1.32. 3.33. 0.87. 6.. 3.89. 1.27. 4.11. 0.93. 3.89. 1.05. 72. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(83) 3.22. 0.67. 3.00. 0.71. 3.67. 0.50. 8.. 3.67. 0.50. 3.00. 1.00. 3.44. 0.73. 9.. 3.22. 0.67. 2.22. 0.83. 2.67. 1.12. 10.. 3.22. 0.67. 3.22. 0.83. 3.44. 0.88. 11.. 3.25. 0.71. 3.33. 0.87. 3.33. 1.12. 12.. 3.56. 0.88. 3.11. 0.93. 3.22. 1.09. 13.. 3.78. 0.97. 3.00. 1.12. 3.11. 1.36. 3.78 0.83 3.56 政治大 4.11 0.93 4.33. 1.01. 4.22. 0.83. 0.71. 4.56. 0.53. io. 20.. Nat. 19.. ‧ 國. 18.. 3.33. 1.00. 3.11. 1.05. 3.44. 0.53. 3.44. 1.13. 3.78. 1.20. 3.44. 0.53. 3.33. 3.67. 1.22. 3.67. 0.50. 3.44. 1.13. 3.56. 1.33. 3.67. 0.71. 3.22. 1.09. 3.44. 1.33. 2.67. 0.71. 0.87. 2.11. 1.05. 3.00. 0.87. 1.30. 2.78. 1.39. n. al. 0.50. ‧. 17.. 3.67. 21. 22.. Ch. engchi. 73. 學. 16.. 立. 1.12. sit. 15.. er. 14.. y. 7.. iv 2.00 n U 2.78. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(84) 「. 手. 已. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. 2001. 2006. y. ‧ sit. io. A. n. al. 毛. Ch. engchi. ，. er. Nat. 女. F. i n U；. v. 、 B. 74. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(85) D 三. 八. 反 H. I SWOT. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. F. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. D F I. i n U. v. D. 五也. 分. F I. 75. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(86) 叉. 叉. 叉叉. 2001. 1998. 立 D. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. B. 政治大. F. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat F. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. B. D 代. 叉叉. 76. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(87) 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. io. sit. y. Nat. ％. n. al. Ch. engchi. er. H. 政治大. 文. i v少， n U 也. 工. 工. 引，. G. 之 … 77. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(88) A. ％ B. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. G. 學. C. Nat. io. sit. y. G. er. C. 政治大. n. al. Ch. 叉. engchi. i n U. 叉. v. 女毛. 女. 叉，. ，. ，！叉. ，. 叉. 女叉. C 78. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(89) 叉. 叉. 內. 叉. 之. 水. 毛. ，. …. 毛. 叉. 叉. 內. 叉. …. G. 立. 之，治政大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. en hi ，g c. i n U. v. H 內 C. ，手. 79. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(90) 月. 手. ，. C. 立. 已. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 手. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. B A. I A. G. I. 80. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(91) 叉叉. 叉. ！. 也. 毛. 也女. 「 B. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. io. aI l. ，. y 內. n. ，. A. I. Ch. engchi. sit. Nat. A. er. B. …. …. i n U. v. 子. I. 今化. 毛. G. 也. ，三. 毛 A. 化 81. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(92) B. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. 土. sit. 內！. n. a二 l. ， 100. Ch. er. io. 化了. 公. 女. Nat. 內. 政治大. 二. e n g c，h100i. i n U. v. ，女. ，， 100 B. 82. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(93) E. F. 月. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. E. Ch. engchi. i n U. A. 上 I. 也. 手. v. 引. 之. 上. 83. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(94) C. G. 上 …也. 毛. 毛. 太. 手. 上. 手 C. 政治大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. 之. ，. ，. 代. sit. n. er. io. ，. al 今. o. y. 毛. Nat. 毛. 八. 女. ‧. 之. 上. Ch. engchi. i n U. ok. v. 毛. G. 、. 84. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(95) 三十三十. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Wexley & Latham, 1991. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat Westling & Fox, 2000. 2013. Ch. engchi. 85. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(96) G 之，. ，. ，. 之. H A. 力. ，. 才. ，. 毛 C. 學. 上. 政治大毛. 立. ‧ 國. 毛. 內. ‧. ，. y. ，. io. sit. Nat. ，. n. al. er. 才. A. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. C I. 86. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(97) 叉叉. 內. 比. ？. ，， A. 不. 叉. 之，. 女月. C. ，. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大叉. ‧. I. ，. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 87. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(98) C G I. 化. ，. ，，. …. 子. ，，. ，. ，. C. 學 ‧. ‧ 國. 立. …. 政治大. ，. y. ，. sit. Nat. 內. n. al. er. io. 已. ，. ，. Ch. 毛. engchi. i n U. v. ，. ，之 G. 之. 毛. 八化. 文. 也，. 88. 上. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(99) 化. 文. I. Dension, 1984. Sherriton. 立. Stern 1997. 1988. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. a之l. er. io. sit. y. Nat. E. 手. Ch. engchi. v. C. care. ，女比. i n U. 叉. ，. 女，. 叉. 叉 89. 子. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(100) 引. 子五 C. Tracey, Tannenbaum & Kavanagh 1995. 立. 政治大. 手. n. al. er. io. sit. y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. F. 之， D. Ch 手. i n U. v. e n g c h icommon sense focus 手. 內. 之. H. 內 …. 之 90. 化. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(101) 化. 八之. 內. 也. 六. 叉. … H. 》. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 91. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(102) 已. …. E. 手. D. 立. 已. 已. 政戶治大. io. n. al. er. detail. 也. y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Nat 內. 五. sit. 手. Ch. engchi. i n 引， U. v. 少 D. 手. D. 92. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(103) 乙. 大. 內. 引. 手. 乙. 內. 手. 引. 他. 乙 D. 「. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. C. 手八. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 毛. 毛. focus 手化又. ， 93. C. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(104) F. 手. 已. 毛. 學. 上. 上. ‧ F. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. ，. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大. Ch. engchi. 94. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(105) 之. 代三. Dochy 1994. 已. 、. 政治大 Sweller. 立. 2003. ‧ 國. 學. Alexander, Kulikowich & Jetton, 1995. ‧. 2015. io. n. er. Tobias, 1994; Alexander, 1996. al. Ch. 2002. y. Dochy, 1996. sit. Nat. 2007. Kohler, 1987. engchi. i n U. v. C ，，女. D. 、 95. 之. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(106) 之. 毛. 化. 之. 手. H. 文之. 文. E. 政治大. 立. ‧ 國女. 學. D. ‧ 仔. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. F. Ch. engchi. i n U. vG. 之， — 》. 96. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(107) 1990. 1993. 2004. ‧. 》. n. al. 付. Ch. y er. io. 上. 毛. C. sit. 之，. Nat. 之. 1999. 學. ‧ 國. Truskie, 1982. 治政大 Tracey & Tews, 1995 1999 立. e n gH c h i. ！. i n U. 手. v. 已. 女引. ！！. ，. H 97. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(108) I B. 上. ，. 及不. 上. G. 政治大. 學. ‧ 國. 立毛. ‧. ，，. 比友. io. sit. Nat. .... 上. y. D. 之. n. al. er. 之. ，之. 比. Ch. engchi. i n U. v代. G. Noe & Schmitt 1986. 98. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(109) A 已，. F. 什. 子. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al 化 Ch. er. io. sit. y. Nat. … 引. engchi 叉. 工. 已. i n U. v. 了. F. G. 99. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(110) 化. ，. 之不. 之. ，. 不 G. B H I. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. H. 政治大. n. er. io. B I. al. Ch. y. ！. sit. Nat. 引. engchi. i n U. v. 及. 毛. 入. 化. B. 100. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(111) 上. 毛女. 女一. 比. I. 》. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大已. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Baldwin & Ford, 1988. F G. 女. 101. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(112) B. 》 swot. 方方. 木. 化. C I. 文. D. 手 E. 化. … 治政大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. I. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 之. ％. 比比. Ch. i n U. 女. engchi. 之. v. （（. 之才. 102. I. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(113) Edgar Dale. 1946. Cone of Learning 10%. 70% 90%. 5%. 50%. 立. H. 90%. 已. 化. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. ％. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 75%. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Wexley & Thornton, 1972. A. 、. 之女. ；引 103. 尤. H. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(114) 他. 之. 手化. 今. ，. ）. 人 B H B. H. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. 也. sit. Nat. …. n. al. er. io. ，. ，. Ch. ，. 及. engchi. i n U. …. v. … ，. ，. 付，. B. 104. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(115) ，. …. 毛. ，. ，. 以內. ，. 內 H. 之. Tziner, Haccoun & Kadish 1991 Gregoire, Propp & Poertner 1998. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大. 」 1996. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat F. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. …. G. 之內. 之. 代之. 代代 105. 之. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(116) 付心. 之. 不. 之. 之之. G. 什. E H. 政治大. 立. B. D. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. ，. Ei n U. v. 不. e-mail. ，. 內毛. C. 毛毛. H. 106. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(117) E H. 乎. 之. 毛 …. 了. 代. ‧ 國. 之. 了. 女. …. ‧. B. 之. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 尤. 之. 學. 之. 立. … 治政之大. 尤之. Ch. engchi. 女. i n U. v. 之. ，. C. 毛五. 女. 之. 之毛. 女內. 107. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(118) 之 D. 代. B C D. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 化. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 之. I. Ch. G. engchi. i n U. v. 叉叉，. 己. 大. A B. A. 108. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(119) （. 引. B. 女. 付. 他. 引. …. 立. ，. 引. 子. 子及才. 女. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. 之. Ch. engchi. C. i n U. B. v. G. ％上. 毛. y. ‧ 國. 主. ‧. 女. 政治大. 學. 引. 八. 女. 手 … 109. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(120) 手. 已. （ cover. …. 」. 六之. 六. 上. C. 之. 下乙叉. ‧ 國. 代. 學. 文. 立. 政治大 G. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 及. i n U. v. 已. 110. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(121) 》. Noe. Schmitt 1986. Baldwin & Ford, 1988 」 1996 Holton, 1997 Gregoire, Propp & Poertner, 1998 Susan & Judith, 2004 Bahn, 1973. 政治大. 立. 1999. ‧. ‧ 國. 2007. Xiao, 1996. 學. Huczynski & Lewis, 1980 Curry, 1994. Noe 2002. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Holton 1997. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. E E. 女引. 引. 111. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(122) H. 毛女. 之 B. ！上. I. 立. 政治大，. ‧ 國. 學. 之. G. ‧. n. al. 之. Ch. 已. engchi. er. io 之. sit. y. Nat. 手. i n U. v. 之內. ％. G. 之； 112. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(123) ，. 毛. 女之，. 女. ，之. 內. 內. 之. ‧ Weidenfeld, Williams & Butler, 2010; Jiang, Wang &. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Zhao, 2012. 女. 學. G. ‧ 國. 立. 女治政大女方. G. Ch. i n U. v. Huczynski & Lewis, 1980. engchi. Ford, Quinones, Sego & Sorra 1992. Garavaglia, 1993 113. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(124) E. G. 「. B. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. C. sit. y. Nat. n. al. C. er. io. 1999 ，. Ch. engchi. i n U. ，. v. 「. E. G. G. D 114. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(125) H. D G. 立. 毛. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 C. 久. 之，. n. al. Ch. engchi. er. io. 女. sit. y. Nat. 入. C. 政治大. i n U. D G. v. 「、. 115. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(126) B ，. A ，. 立. 比治政G 大. ？內. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. B. en hi 叉g c. i n U. v. …. 叉. Weiner, 1985. 116. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(127) Holton, 1996; Mathieu et al., 1992; Noe & Schmitt, 1986. 之. 三. 政治大. 立. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. 106. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. H. 天. 引. B. 手付. ，. 之. 、. 之，. 之. ％. …. 之. 117. 引. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(128) E 已. ；. … G. 已毛 G. 立. 叉. 內. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學》. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 手. Ch. i n U. engchi. 毛. v. 已. 也. ，… 毛 G. 之. 118. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(129) 學. ，十且. n. al. 公. 中. Ch. 化. ，. engchi. 小仔. sit. io. 公. 十且. er. Nat. …. ‧. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大. y. B. i n U. v. 文 B. C. 119. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(130) 女之. （ H ，. 內八. 大. I. 大化已. 引. 立. 引. 天大. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. e n內g c h i. i n U. v. H 心. 才. … I. 女. … G 手. 升. 之 C. 120. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(131) I. C. 比. 立. 治政大女！毛，. 月. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 之，. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 小. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. C. learning by doing. I 」比. 比付. 比之. …. 比之 121. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(132) B. 之. 之. 引. 付. 立. 叉治政 B 大. 他. ‧ 國. 學. F. ‧. 之，. 之. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. Dewey 1938. v. — 、. 122. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(133) H. ，. 之. ； B. 之上. D 叉. 女. 立. ‧. 《. y. sit. al. n. 六互. er. io. 已. Nat. 手. G. 學. ‧ 國. 升. 女治政大. 六互. 仔. Ch. engchi. 女. i n U. v. 之. 女. 、. 「. 之. ，. 123. 毛. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(134) 手. 已. G. H 之. 之. 內. 立. ，. 心. 才. 政治大，. … 少. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 124. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(135) 6. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 125. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.


(137) 三. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 、. 127. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.




(141) 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大 Kirkpatrick. Baldwin & Ford. ‧. Kirkpatrick 2006. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 131. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(142) 》. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 、. Baldwin. 132. Ford 1988. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(143) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 133. i n U. v. 》. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(144) 三. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 134. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(145) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. io. n. al. sit. 2013. er. 2012. 2010. y. 2009. Ch. engchi. 135. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(146) 立. 政治大. 2011. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. —. 、. 136. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.


(148) 、. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 138. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(149) Kirkpatrick. 立. Baldwin & Ford. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 139. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(150) 1988 7. 173-198 2014. 2000. 2001. 立. ‧ 國. ‧. 2003. 學. 1990. 政治大. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 2005 1. 1. 45-57 2010. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 1996. 2003. 1999. 140. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(151) 2013. 2001. 72. 、. 2013. 2000 2014. ‧ 國. y. sit. al. n 2013. 2 4. er. io. 2008. Nat. 1-24. ‧. 2006. 立. 學. 2006. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Earl Babbie. 2005. 2006 55. 141. 1-34. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(152) 2018. 1989. 2000. 45. 16-23. 2002. 34. 2010. 3. 5-19 6 3. 17-35 2002. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. io 」. al. y. n. 2000. sit. Nat. 2007. er. 2010. 1996. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 72. 213-262. —. 2010. 2002. 1998 142. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(153) 2011. John. W. Creswell 2013. T&D. 178. 1-18. 2003 3. 1. 81-111. 2010. 2007. 政治大. sit. n. al. er. io. 1991. 2004 595-620. 8 4. y. Nat. 1-62. ‧. 1999. ‧ 國. 學. 1995. 立. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 12 3. 1995. 2002 2005 1. 1. 99-115. 2001. 143. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(154) 2012 2010 4. 2. 59-91. 2002. 1999. 1993. ‧. ‧ 國. 2018. 學. 2013. 立. 政治大. 2007. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2003. 2009. 9. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 98. 2016 41 2011. 27-48 99 10. 43-71. 1998. 144. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(155) 1995 3. 227-251. 2007. —. 2012 8. 2. 25-40. 1999. 2015. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 2011. sit. y. Nat. 2014 10. 2. a1-20 l C h. n. 49. er. io. 2006 T&D. 102. engchi. i n U. v. 1. 55-106. 27-39 2010 1 2010. 2003. 145. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(156) 2012. 2011. --. T&D. 19. 3-15. 2013 182. 56-68. 2006 43. 4. 3-12. 2013 1-19. T&D. 225. 1-15. ‧. 2004. sit. y. 215-260. n. al. T&D. er. Kirkpatrick. io. 2010. Nat. 13. 17 2014. 179. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 2016. T&D. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. 90. 1-. v. 179. 49-. 55 1983. 1 2010. 4. 55-60 John W. Creswell & Vicki. L. Plano Clark 2010. 146. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(157) 2012 T&D. 157. 1-24. 1994 1995 1998. 2011 53. 立. 25-64. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 147. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(158) Alan, M. S., & Monica, B. (2006). An investigation of training activities & transfer of training in organizations. Human Resource Management, 45(4), 629-648. Alexander, P. A. (1996). The past, present and future of knowledge research: A reexamination of the role of knowledge in learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 31, 89-92. Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of. 政治大 Educational Psychology, 立 87, 559-575.. knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of. ‧ 國. 學. Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W., Traver, H. & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta- analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50,. ‧. 341-358.. y. Nat. io. sit. Anderson, S. B., & Ball, S. (1978). The profession and practice of program evaluation.. er. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.. al. n. v i n Arthur Jr, W., Bennett, W., Jr., C Edens, P. S., & Bell, S.UT. (2003). Effectiveness of hengchi training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234-245. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(3), 63-105. Bass, B. M., & Vaughan, J.A. (1966). Training in industry: The management of learning. Belment, CA: Wadsworth.. 148. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(159) Baumgartel, H., & Jeanpierre, F. (1972). Applying new knowledge in the back-home setting: A study of Indian managers' adoptive efforts. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 8(6), 674-694. Baumgartel, H., Reynolds, M. & Pathan R. (1984). How personality and organizational-climate variables moderate the effectiveness of management development programs: A review and some recent research findings. Management and Labor Studies, 9, 1-16. Baurngartel, H., Sullivan, G. J., & Dunn, L. E. (1978). How organizational climate and. 治政大 training sessions. personality affect the pay-off from advanced management 立 ‧ 國. 學. Kansas Business Review, 5, 1-10.. Bhatti, M. A., Battour, M. M., Sundram, V. P. K., & Othman, A. A. (2013). Transfer. ‧. of training: Does it truly happen? An examination of support, instrumentality,. sit. y. Nat. retention and learner readiness on the transfer motivation and transfer of training.. n. al. er. io. European Journal of Training & Development, 37(3), 273-297.. i n U. v. Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T. & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training:. Ch. engchi. A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36, 1065-1105. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An th. introduction to theory and methods (5. Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.. Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competence manager: A model for effective performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons. nd. Bramley, P. (1996). Evaluating training effectiveness (2. Ed.)., London: McGraw-. Hill .. 149. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(160) Briggs, G. E., & Naylor, J. C. (1962). The relative efficiency of several training methods as a function of transfer task complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 505-512. Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1988). An integrated evaluation model for HRD. Journal of Training & Development, 42(2), 66-88. Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1998). An integrated evaluation model for HRD. In D. L. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), Another look at evaluating training programs (pp. 78-80). Alexandria, VA: ASTD.. 治政大 Action-packed Broad, M. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (1992). Transfer of training: 立 ‧. ‧ 國. Wesley.. 學. strategies to ensure high payoff from training investments. New York: Addison-. Bryman, A. (1999). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research. In A.. y. sit. n. al. er. io. CA: Sage.. Nat. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative research (pp. 35-69). Newbury Park,. i n U. v. Burden, R., & Proctor, T. (2000). Creating a sustainable competitive advantage through. Ch. engchi. training. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 6, 90-97. Bushnell, D. S. (1990). Input, process, output: A model for evaluating training. Training and Development Journal, 44(3), 41-43. Campbell, J. P. (1971). Personal training and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 22, 565-602. Chlivickas, E. (2010). Development of human resources system for improvement of public administration in central and eastern european countries. The 6th International Scientific Conference, Vilnius. 150. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(161) Clegg, W. H. (1987). Management training evaluation: An update. Training and Development Journal, 41(2), 65-71. Dale, E. (1946). The cone of experience. In audio-visual methods in teaching. New York: Dryden Press. In D. P. Ely & T. Plomp (Eds.), Classic writings on instructional technology (pp. 169-180). Englewood: Libraries Unlimited, Inc. Dension, D. R. (1984). Bringing corporate culture to the bottom line. Organizational Dynamics, 13(2), 5-21. nd. 政治大 Fortworth, Tex: The Dryden 立 .. DeSimone, R. L., & Harris, D. M. (1998). Human resource development(2. Ed.).. ‧ 國. 學. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. London Collier-Macmillan. Dochy, F. (1994). Prior knowledge and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite. ‧. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 4698-4702). Oxford/ New. y. Nat. io. sit. York: Pergamon Press.. er. Dubin, S. S. (1990). Maintaining competence through updating. In Willis, S. L., &. al. n. v i n C h professional competence Dubin, S. S. (Eds.), Maintaining (pp. 44–48). San engchi U Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.. Eddy, W. B., Glad, D. D. & Wilkins, D. D. (1967). Organizational effects on training. Training and Development Journal, 22(2), 36-43. Eden, D., & Ravid, G. (1982). Pygmalion versus self-expectancy: Effects of instructor and self-expectancy on trainee performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 351-364. Eden, D., & Shani, A. B. (1982). Pygmalion goes to boot camp: Expectancy, leadership, and trainee performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 194-199. 151. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(162) Ellis, H. C. (1965). The transfer of learning. New York: Macmillan. Farazmand, A. (2009). Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: A modest prescription for the twenty-first century. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1007-1020. Fleishman, E.A. (1953). Leadership climate, human relations training, and supervisory behavior. Personnel Psychology, 6, 205-222. Ford J. K., Quinones, M. A., Sego, D. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1992). Factors affecting the opportunity to perform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 511-527.. 政治大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. Ford, J. K., & Wroten, S. P. (1984). Introducing new methods for conducting training evaluation to program redesign. Personnel Psychology, 37,651-666.. ‧. Ford, J. R., & Weissbein, D. H. (1997). Transfer of training: An updated review and. sit. y. Nat. analysis. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10(2), 22-41.. n. al. er. io. Gagné, R. M. (1962). Military training and principles of learning. American Psychologist, 17, 83-91.. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Galvin, J. C. (1983). What trainers can learn from educators about evaluating management training. Training and Development Journal, 37(8), 52-57. Garavaglia, P. L. (1993). How to ensure transfer of training. Training and Development, 47(1), 63-68. Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Goldstein, I. L. (1986). Training in organization: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (2. nd. Ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole. 152. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(163) Goldstein, I. L. (1992). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, rd and evaluation (3 Ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole. Goldstein, I. L. (1998). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, th. and evaluation (4. Ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole. nd. Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (2. Ed.). Thousand. Oaks, CA: Sage. Gregoire, T. K., Propp, J., & Poertner, J. (1998). The supervisor’s role in the transfer. 治政 of training. Administration in Social Work, 22(1),大 1-18. 立 ‧ 國. 學. Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103-120.. ‧. Hamblin, A. C. (1974). Evaluation and control of training. London: McGraw-Hill.. sit. y. Nat. Hand, H. H., Richards, M. D., & Slocum, J. M. (1973). Organization climate and the. al. n. 16, 185-195.. er. io. effectiveness of a human relations program. Academy of Management Journal,. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Hellriegel D., & Slocum, J. W. (1974). Organizational climate Measures, research and contingencies. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 255-280. Hicks, W. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1987). Entry into training programs and its effects on training outcomes: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 542-552. Holton, E. F. III (1996). The flawed four-level evaluation model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(1), 5-25.. 153. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(164) House, R. J. (1968). Leadership training: Some dysfunctional consequences. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 556-571. Huczynski, A. A., & Lewis, J. W. (1980). An empirical study into the learning transfer process in management training. Journal of Management Studies, 17, 227-240. James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096-1112. Jiang, J., Wang, S., & Zhao, S. (2012). Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. The International Journal. 治政大 of Human Resource Management, 23(19), 4025-4047. 立 ‧ 國. 學. Kasim, R. S. R. & Ali, S. (2011). The influence of training design on training transfer performance among support staff of higher education institution in Malaysia.. ‧. International Journal of Innovation Management and Technology, 2(5), 377-. sit. y. Nat. 382.. n. al. er. io. Kirkpatrick, D. L. & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluation programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, 13(11), 3-9. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs The four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. nd. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs The four Levels (2. Ed.).. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: A systematic approach to education. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. 154. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(165) Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Hults, B. M. (1987). An exploration of climates for technical updating and performance. Personnel Psychology, 40, 539-563. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328. Kubeck, J. E., Delp, N. D., Haslett, T. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Does job-related training performance decline with age? Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 92-107. Laker, D. R. (1990). Dual dimensionality of training transfer. Human Resource. 治政大 Development Quarterly, 1 (3), 209–235. 立 ‧ 國. 學. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (1992). Influences of individual and. ‧. situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of. sit. y. Nat. Management Journal, 35(4), 828-847.. n. al. er. io. Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2008). Human resource management. USA, Mason: Thomson South-Western.. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-24. McGehee, W., & Thayer, P. W. (1961). Training in business and industry. New York: Wiley. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2009). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7. th. Ed.). Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall.. Mirabile, R. J. (1997). Everything you want to know about competency modeling. Training & Development, 51(8), 73-77. 155. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(166) Naylor, J. C., & Briggs, G. E. (1963). The effect of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 217-224. Newstorm, J. W. (1978). Catch-22: The problems of incomplete evaluation of training. Training & Development Journal, 32(11), 22-24. Nickoles, F. W. (2005). Why a stakeholder approach to evaluating training. Advances in Developing Human Resource, 7(1), 121-134. Noe, R. A. (2006). Employee training and development. Irwin: McGraw-Hill.. 治政 Noe, R. A., & Ford, J. K. (1992). Emerging issues and 大 new directions for training 立 ‧ 國. 學. research. In G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 345-384). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.. ‧. Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training. sit. y. Nat. effectiveness: Test a model. People Psychology, 39, 494-523.. n. al. er. io. Olivero, G., Bane, K.D., & Kopelman, R.E. (1997). Executive coaching as a transfer of. i n U. v. training tool: Public agency. Public Personnel Management, 26, 461-469.. Ch. engchi. Parry, S. B. (1998). Just what is a competency? And why should you care? Training, 35(6), 58−64. Phillips, J. J. (1983). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company. Phillips, J. J. (1991). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods nd. (2. Ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company.. 156. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(167) Phillips, J. J. (1997). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods rd. (3. Ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.. Reber, R. A., & Wallin, J. A. (1984). The effects of training, goal-setting, and knowledge of results on safe behavior: A component analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 544-560. Robinson, D.G., & Robinson, J.C. (1995). Performance consulting: Moving beyond training. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.. 政治大 Rosow, J. M., & Zager, R. (1988). 立 Training: The competitive edge. San Francisco, CA: Robinson, J. C. (1984). You should have sent my boss. Training, 21(2), 45-47.. ‧ 國. 學. Jossey-Bass.. Rouiller, J. Z., & Goldstein, I. L. (1993). The relationship between organizational. ‧. transfer climate and positive transfer of training. Human Resource Development. y. Nat. io. sit. Quarterly, 4(4), 377-390.. er. Ryman, D. H., & Biersner, R. J. (1975). Attitudes predictive of diving training. n. al. C h 28(2), 181-188. U n i success. Personnel Psychology, engchi. v. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic review. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schneider, B. (1983). Work climates: An interactionist perspective. In N. W. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 106-128). New York: Praeger.. 157. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(168) Schneider, B. (1985). Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 573611. Sherriton, J., & Stern, J. (1997). HR's role in culture change. HR Focus, 74(4), 27. Shore, E., & Sechrest, L. (1961). Concept attainment as a function of positive instances presented. Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 303-307. Snyder, R. A., Raben, C. S., & Farr, J. L. (1980). A model for the systemic evaluation human resource development programs. Academy of Management Review,5(3), 431-444.. 治政大at work: Models for superior Spencer, Jr. L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence 立 ‧ 國. 學. performance. New York: Wiley and Sons.. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1966). A deep study of the evaluation requirement. Theory Into. ‧. Practice,5(3), 121-133.. sit. y. Nat. Stufflebeam, D. L., Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E.G., Hammond, R. L., Merrima,. n. al. er. io. H. O. & Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, Illinois : F.E. Peacock.. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Susan, E. C., & Kolb, J. A. (2004). An examination of work-environment support factors affecting transfer of supervisory skills training to the workplace. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(4), 449-471. Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 215–266). San Diego: Academic Press.. 158. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(169) Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8(3), 247- 261. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37-54. Tracey, J. B., & Tews, M. J. (1995). Training effectiveness: Accounting for individual characteristics and the work environment. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 36(6), 36-42.. 治政大 Applying trained skills on Tracey, J. B., Tannenbaum, S. I. & Kavanagh, M. J. (1995). 立 ‧ 國. 學. the job: The importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 239-252.. ‧. Tracy, W. R. (1984). Designing training and development systems. New York:. sit. y. Nat. Amacom.. n. al. er. io. Trost, A. (1982). They may love it but will they use it? Training and Development Journal, 36(1), 78-81.. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Truskie, S. D. (1982). Getting the most from management development programs. Personnel Journal, 6, 66-68. Tziner, A., Haccoun, R. R., & Kadish, A. (1991). Personal and situational characteristics of transfer of training improvement strategies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 167-177. Van Wart, M., Cayer, N. J., & Cook, S. (1993). Handbook of training and development for the public sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.. 159. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(170) Velada, R., Caetano, A., Michel, J. W., Lyons, B. D., & Kavanagh, M. J. (2007). The effects of training design, individual characteristics and work environment on transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development, 11(4), 282-294. Warr, P. B., Bird, M., & Rackham, N. (1970). The evaluation of management training. London: Gower. Warr, P., Allan, C., & Birdi, K. (1999). Predicting three levels of training outcome. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(3), 351-375.. 治政大Knowledge transfer and Weidenfeld, A., Williams, A. M., & Butler, R. W. (2010). 立 ‧ 國. 學. innovation among attractions. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3), 604–626. nd. Westling, D. L., & Fox, L. (2000). Teaching students with severe disabilities (2. Ed.).. ‧. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.. y. Nat. al. er. io. Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hal.. n. rd. organizations (3. sit. Wexley, K. N., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Developing and training human resource in. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Wexley, K. N., & Nemeroff, W. (1975). Effectiveness of positive reinforcement and goal setting as methods of management development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 239-246. Wexley, K. N., & Thronton, C. L. (1972). Effect of verbal feedback of test results upon learning. Journal of Educational Research, 66, 119-121. Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York: Longman.. 160. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(171) Xiao, J. (1996). The relationship between organizational factors and the transfer of training in the electronics industry in Shenzhen, China. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7, 55-73.. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 161. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(172) 手. 1.. 已. 」. V. 1. PDCA 2. 3. 80. 2.. 20. 4.. 、 5. 3.. 1. SWOT. 2.. 2.. V. ‧. 1.. KPI. Nat. sit. MBO. 3.. n. al 4.. y. 3.. er. io. 2.. 7.. 學. 1.. ‧ 國. 立. 6. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 3.. 4.. 2.. 1.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 162. V. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(173) 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5.. 1.. 1.. 2.. 立2.. ‧ 國. 3.. y. ‧. Nat. n. al. sit. 4.. er. io. 4.. 政治大 2.. 學. 3.. 1.. V. 1.. Ch. engchi. 1.. i n U. v. 1.. V. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. SWOT 4. 5. 2.. 163. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(174) 1.. 2.. 立1.. 政治大 V. 1. 2.. ‧. 2.. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 3.. V. 學. 2.. ‧ 國. 1.. V. 1. 2.. Ch. engchi. i n U. 1.. 1.. 2.. 2.. 164. v. V. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(175) 3.. 1.. 1.. 2.. 2.. V. 3. 4. 1.. V. 1. 2.. 2.. 立3.. 3. 政治大 4.. ‧ 國. 學. 4.. ‧ y. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. 5.. 1.. Ch. engchi. i n U 1.. v. V. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4.. 1.. 1.. 165. V. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(176) 2. 2.. 1.. 1.. 2.. 2.. V. 3. 3.. 、. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大、. 4. AMART. ‧. Nat 1.. n. al. er. io. sit. y. V. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. V. 2.. 3.. 166. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(177) V. 1.. 2. 3.. 1.. 1.. 2.. 立 3.. 4.. y. ‧. Nat. n. al. sit. 4.. er. io. 「. 2. 治政大 3.. 學. ‧ 國. 2.. V. 1.. Ch. engchi. 1.. i n U 1.. v. V. 2. 2. 3.. 1.. 1.. 2.. 2.. 167. V. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(178) 3.. 1.. V. 1. 2.. 2. 3.. 4. ·. 學. ‧ 國. 立5.. 政治大. 1.. ‧. 2.. n. a l1.. Ch. i n U 1.. engchi. er. io. sit. y. Nat 》. V. v. V. 2.. 2.. 》. 3. 4.. 168. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(179) 。. 立. V. c. 107. 10. 學. ‧ 國. c. 政治大. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. i n U. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14.. ………………………………..c ……………….…………………………… c ….…………………………… c ….……………………………… c …….……………………………… c …….……………………………… c …….………………………… c ….………………… c ….…………………………… c ….…………………………… c ….……………………… c ….………………………………………… c ….………………………………………… c .…………………………… c. 15. 16.. v. c c c c c c c c c c c c c c. c c c c c c c c c c c c c c. c c c c c c c c c c c c c c. c c c c c c c c c c c c c c. ….………………………… c. c. c. c. c. ….…………………… c. c. c. c. c. Ch. engchi. 169. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.

(180) ….………………… c ….………………………………… c ….…………………… c …….…………… c ….…………………………………… c ….………………………………… c. 立. 4 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c. y. sit. ‧ 國. io. n. al. Ch. engchi. 170. i n U. c c c c c c. c c c c c c. c. ‧. 5 ………………………………..c ……………….…………………………… c ….…………………………… c ….……………………………… c …….……………………………… c …….……………………………… c …….………………………… c ….………………… c ….…………………………… c ….…………………………… c ….……………………… c ….………………………………………… c ….………………………………………… c .…………………………… c ….………………………… c ….…………………… c ….………………… c ….………………………………… c ….…………………… c …….…………… c ….…………………………………… c ….………………………………… c. Nat. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.. c c c c c c. 政治大. 學. 5. c c c c c c. er. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.. v. 1 3 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c. 2 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c. 1 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.009.2019.F09.