組織文化、智慧資本與組織績效之關係：知識運用能力的干擾效果 - 政大學術集成

全文

(1)立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v.

(2) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2011. 8 i.

(3) (1) (2). 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學 160. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. ii.

(4) ABSTRACT Most previous studies have examined the relationship between intellectual capital (IC) and performance. However, possessing IC is not enough. Firms have to apply IC for value creation first. The means which can prompt employees to utilize IC better still remain elusive. Based on the resource-based theory and the institutional theory, this study proposes that the interaction effects between organizational culture and knowledge process capability, such as (1) acquisition process capability, which renews organizational knowledge and (2) protection process capability, which protects. 政治大 Based on time-lag, multiple-informant data of 160 listed organizations, we found 立. knowledge from theft, may strengthen the positive effect of IC further.. ‧ 國. 學. that the interaction effects between organizational culture and knowledge process capability indeed change the performance effect of IC. The results of human capital. ‧. are particularly important because human capital may be negatively associated with. sit. y. Nat. performance if firms overlook the acquisition process capability.. n. al. er. io. In order to examine the industrial difference, this study divides the sample into. i n U. v. three industries for investigation. The results display different combinations of. Ch. engchi. organizational culture and knowledge process capability strengthen the positive performance effect of IC in different industry. This study further provides the theoretical and managerial implication. The performance effect of IC is more complex than what previous study assumed. The moderating effects of organizational culture and knowledge process capability have a critical influence on the relationship between IC and performance.. Keywords: Intellectual capital, organizational culture, acquisition process capability, protection process capability. iii.

(5) ................................................................................................................ 1 ........................................................................................................ 4 .......................................................................... 4 .......................................................................... 8 ........................................................ 11 .................... 17 ...................................................................................................... 20 ................................................................................................ 20 .................................................................................... 20 ............................................................................ 21 ........................................................................................ 28 .................................................................................... 29 ............................................................................ 30 ...................................................................................................... 38 ........................................................................................ 38 ................................................................................................ 64 .................................................................................................. 77 ........................................................................................ 77 ........................................................................................ 85 ............................................................................ 88 ................................................................................................ 92 ........................................................................................ 93 ...................................................................................................................... 94 110 ............................................................................................ 135 ........................................................................................ 141. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. iv.

(6) 1. ............................................................................................................... 11. 2. ................................................................................................................................... 20. 3. ........................................................................................... 40. 4. ........................................................................................... 40. 5. ............................................................ 43. 6. ............................ 43. 7. ............................................................ 44. 8. ............................ 44. 9. ............................................................ 46. 10. .......................... 46. 11. .......................................................... 47. 12. 立. 13 14. ‧ 國. 18. .......................................................... 53. io. 21. 23. _. 24. _. 25. _. y. .......................... 59. .......................................................... 60. al. n. 22. .......................... 55. .......................................................... 59. sit. 20. .......................... 53. .......................................................... 55. Nat. 19. .......................... 50. ‧. 17. .......................................................... 50. er. 16. .......................... 47. 學. 15. 政治大. v i ........................................................................... 69 n Ch U e n g........................................................................... 69 chi. .............................. 60. .................................................................... 69. 26. _. .................................... 72. 27. _. .................... 72. 28. _. ........................ 74. 29. _. ............ 74. 30. _. ........................ 76. 31. _. ............ 76. v.

(7) ....................................................................................... 7 ......................................................................................... 24 ..................................................................................... 25 ..................................................................................... 26 ..................................................................................................... 29 _ ............................................................................... 32 _ ................................................... 33 _ ............................................................................... 34 ................................................................................................. 35 ....................................................................................................... 37 ....................................................................... 39 ................................... 42 ................................... 45 ................................... 49 ................................... 51 ................................... 52 ................................... 54 ................................... 58 ................................... 61 ................................... 62 ............................................................................................... 63 ................................................................................................... 64 ............................................................................................... 65 ......................................................... 67 ......................................................... 68 _ ................................................. 70 ..................... 71 _ ............. 73 _ ............. 75 ....................................................................................... 77 ........................................................................... 91. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31. _ _ _. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. vi.

(8) (The World Bank) 1999. (The World. Development Report) OECD (The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) 50. GDP. (Davidson & Voss, 2002; Scheider & Samkin, 2008) (Drucker, 1993) ) 治 ( 政大 Joshi, 2002; Liebskind, 1996; Yang & Lin, 2009) 立 Edvinsson, 2008; Garcia-Ayuso, 2003). (intangible elements; Carmeli. (knowledge assets; Spender & Grant, 1996; Teece, (Knowledge-based resources; Wiklund & Sheperd, 2003). sit. y. Nat. 1998). (Lin &. ‧. & Tishler, 2004). ; Holsapple &. 學. ‧ 國. (. io. al. n. Youndt, 2005)…. er. (intellectual capital; Reed, Lubatkin, & Srinivasan, 2006; Subramaniam &. Lerro, & Santitate, 2008). Ch. n U engchi. (Schiuma,. iv. (Hitt & Ireland, 2002; Yang & Lin,. 2009; Sharabati, Jawad, & Bontis, 2010) (1). (Bontis, 1998; Edvinsson & Malone, 1997; Nazari & Herremans, 2007) (2). (Barney, 1991; Hitt, Bierman, Shimizu, & Koghhar, 2001; Teece, Pisano,. Shuen, 1997) 1.

(9) (resource-based theory) (Bontis, 1998; Kang & Snell, 2009; Mavridis, 2004; Reed et al., 2006; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005; Tovstiga & Tulugurova, 2007) (3). (Bukh, 2003; Bruggen, Vergauwen, & Dao, 2009) (4). 政治大. (Herremans & Isaac, 2004; Kujansivu & Lonnqvist, 2008). 立. ‧ 國. 學. 1. (Bontis, 1998; Mavridis, 2004;. ‧. Tovstiga & Tulugurova, 2007). y. sit. io. n. al. (Oliver, 1997). Ch. er. 2004). Nat. (Barney, 1991; Ray, Barney, & Muhanna, 2004; Herremans & Isaac,. n U engchi. iv. (organizational culture). (Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995; Kayworth & Leidner, 2003) (Denison, 1996; Ginsberg, 1994; Oliver, 1997) 1981; Greve, Engelen, & Brettel, 2009). (Child, -. (Bontis, 1999; Kayworth & Leidner, 2003) ( 2005). (Cameron & 2.

(10) Quinn, 1999). Lin. Whetten (2008). (fit). (competing values framework, Quinn & Rohrbaugh, 1981, 1983; Quinn, 1988; Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Ralston, Terpstra-Tong, Terpstra, Wang, & Egri, 2006). 政治大 (Barney, 1991; Jansen, Van Den Bosch, & Volberda, 2005; Oliver, 1997; Ray et al., 立 2. 2004; Hitt & Ireland, 2002; Sharabati et al., 2010). ‧ 國. 學. -. (Drucker, 1993; Holsapple & Joshi, 2002;. ‧. Nafukho,Graham, & Muyia, 2009). er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. v i n Crossan, Lane, & White, 2004 C h 1999;Vera & Crossan, engchi U n. 1993, p. 19. Wick & Leon,. (Chan, Shaffer, & Snape, 2004; Madsen. & Desai, 2010; Ulrich, 1998). (Barney, 1991; Liebeskind, 1996; Lee, Chang, Liu, & Yang, 2007). 3.

(11) (acquisition process capability) (protection process capability) 2001). (Gold, Malhotra, & Segars,. -. (1). (2). 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. i n U. Galbraith(1969). 1990. engchi. v. (. ) 20. 1.69(Edvinsson & Malone, 1997) Malone. 1997. 0.82 Edvinsson. Skandia Navigator. (Edvinsson, 1997; Garcia-Ayuso, 2003; Goh, 2005; Marr, Gray, & Neely, 2003; Sveiby, 2000) (. 1) 4.

(12) SSCI (Bontis, Crossan, & Hulland, 2002; Mayo, 2000; Pennings, Lee, & Witteloostuijn, 1998; Reed et al., 2006; Ruta, 2009; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). (DeCarolis & Deeds, 1999; Huber, 1991) (Barney, 1991; Edelman, Brush, & Manolova, 2005; Nonaka, 1994). ( 治政 2005; Bontis, Keow, & Richardson, 2000; Mata,大 Fuerst, & Barney, 1995; Quinn, 立. Anderson, & Finkelstein, 1996). ‧ 國. 學 ‧. (Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). sit. y. (Organizational Capital. Structural Capital). (Roos & Roos, 1997; McElroy, 2002). io. n. al. Relational Capital). er. Nat. (Human Capital). (Social Capital. iv. Customer Capital. n & Saez, 2008; Moon & Castro C h (Bozbura, 2004; U engchi. Kym, 2006; Stewart, 1997; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). (Innovational /Renewal Capital). (Van. Buren, 1999; Joia, 2000; Nazari & Herremans, 2007). (1) (skill). (Human Capital) (capability) (2). (Organizational Capital). (3). (Social Capital) 5.

(13) (Bontis, 1999; Campisi & Costa, 2008; Hitt et al., 2001; Isaac, Herremans, & Kline, 2009; Mayo, 2000; Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998; Roos, Roos, Dragonetti, & Edvinsson, 1997; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005; Sharabati et al., 2010; Zheng, 2010) (Quinn et al., 1996; Stewart, 1997; Ulrich, 1998; Campisi & Costa, 2008) (Armstrong, 2003; Reed et al., 2006). 立. 政治大. (Bozbura, 2004; Moon & Kym, 2006; Wu, Lin, & Hsu, 2007) Subramanian & Youndt. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. (2005). n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Reed et al. (2006). Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Bontis et al. 2002; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). 6.

(14) 1. Edvinsson & Malone(1997). Bontis et al.(2000) Maviridis(2004). Goh(2005). 立. 政治大. Subramaniam & Youndt(2005). ‧ 國. 學 ‧. Moon & Kym(2006). Nat. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nazari & Herremans(2007). Tovstiga & Tulugurova(2007). Ch. …. engchi. i n U. v. Campisi & Costa(2008). Ruta(2009). Huang & Wu(2010). Sharabati et al.(2010). (. ) 7.

(15) (Baron, 1997; Schein, 1992). (Baron, 1997; Chatman & Jehn, 1994; Howard,1998; Holsapple & Joshi, 2002; Ravasi & Schultz, 2006; Schein, 1985;. 2002) (assumption). (what is important). (vision). 治政 (how 大are done) things. (belief). 立. (Barney, 1986; Eker & Eker, 2009). ‧ 國. 學. (Barney, 1986; Chow &. ‧. Liu, 2009; Eker & Eker, 2009). sit. y. Nat. (Arogyaswamy &. io. Joshi, 2002; Ravasi & Schultz, 2006; Schein, 1985). n. al. Ch. engchi. er. Byles, 1987; Barney, 1986; Chatman & Jehn, 1994; Gold et al., 2001; Holsapple &. i n U. v. (Chatman & Spataro, 2005; Erdogan, Liden, & Kraimer, 2006; O’Reilly & Chatman, 1996; Sorensen, 2002) (Aycan, 2005; Chow & Liu, 2009) (Chatman & Jehn, 1994). (Cameron & Quinn, 1999) 8.

(16) (Schein, 1984; Kotter & Heskett, 1992) (power distance). Hofstede(1980). (uncertainty avoidance). (masculinity). (individualism). O’ Reilly, Chatman, & Caldwell(1991). 54. … (Cameron & Quinn, (competing values framework). 1999). 治政大Kwan & Walker, 2004; (Lin & Whetten, 2008; Deshpand´e & Farley, 2004; 立 (Cameron & Quinn, 1999). Ralston et al., 2006). (. ‧ 國. 學. ). ‧. (Cameron, 1986; Buenger, Daft, Colon, &Austin,1996; Denison & Spreitzer,. (Van Vuuren, Veldkamp, Jong, & Seydel,. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 1991; Livari & Huisman, 2007; Ralston et al., 2006). 2007; Ostroff, Shin, & Kinicki, 2005). n. al. & Webster, 1993). Ch. n U engchi. & Goodman, 2000; Obendhain & Johnson, 2004) (Prajogo & McDermott, 2005). iv. (Deshpandé, Farley, (Zammuto, Gifford,. TQM (AMT). (McDermott & Stock, 1999; Zammuto & O’connor, 1992). (1). —. (2). —. 9.

(17) (Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Denison & Spreitzer, 1991; Livari & Huisman, 2007; Quin & Rohrbaugh, 1983; Prajogo & McDermott, 2005) (. 1) (1). (Clan. culture) (mentor). (parent). (2). (Hierarchy. culture). (Market culture). 立. (3). 學. ‧ 國. (aggresive) (4). 政治大. (Adhocracy culture). ‧ (Cameron &. er. io. sit. y. Nat. (decentralized management). Quinn, 1999; Cameron, Quinn, Degraff, & Thakor, 2007; Denison & Spreitzer, 1991;. al. n. v i n C het al., 2006; PrajogoU& McDermott, 2005; Quin & Rohrbaugh, 1983; Ralston engchi Zammuto & O’connor, 1992). (1) (Walton & Dawson, 2001) (ideal types). ( (. ). ) (Cameron & Quinn,. 1999; Denison & Spreitzer, 1991; Quin & Rohrbaugh, 1983; Prajogo & McDermott, 2005; Zammuto & O’connor, 1992). Ralston et al. (2006) 10.

(18) (2). (Denison & Spreitzer, 1991; Howard, 1998; Goodman, Zammuto, & Gifford, 2001). (Clan Culture). (Adhocracy Culture). (Hierarchy Culture). (Market Culture). 學. Nat. n. al. er. io. sit. y. ‧. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大. 1. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Barney, 1991, p.106). (Bontis, 1999; Bontis et al., 2002; Cohen & Kaimenakis, 2007). 11.

(19) (Barney, 1986; Chow & Liu, 2009; Chatman & Jehn, 1994; Ravasi & Schultz, 2006; Schein, 1985). (Barney,. 1991). (Oiver, 1997). (isomorphic force) (1). (coercive process) (artifact)(Schein, 1984). 立. process). 政治大 ; (2). (mimetic. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. (normative process). ; (3). sit. y. Nat. io. n. al. er. (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983; Kondra & Hurst, 2009). Ch. n U engchi. iv. (Chan et al., 2004; Ford. & Baucus, 1987; López, Peon, & Ordas, 2004; Leonard & Swap, 2004). (Pil & Leana, 2009). (Kondra & Hurst, 2009; Lepak & Snell, 1999; Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Prajogo & McDermott, 2005; Ralston et al., 2006) 12.

(20) (Hitt et al., 2001; Pil & Leana, 2009). 立. 政治大 (Cameron et al., 2007; Ralston. et al., 2006; Bontis, 1999; Campisi & Costa, 2008; Hitt et al., 2001; Zheng, 2010). ‧. ‧ 國. 學. (Kondra & Hurst, 2009). n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. (Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Kondra & Hurst, 2009; Prajogo & McDermott, 2005; Ralston et al., 2006). 13.

(21) (Pennings et al., 1998). (Ralston et al.,. 2006) …. 政治大 (Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Quin & Rohrbaugh, 1983; Larson & Christensen, 1993; 立 Tesluk, Farr, & Klein, 1997). ‧ 國. 學. (Subramaniam & Youndt,. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2005) R. D. ‧. Roberts, Ross, Smith, & Kleiner, 1994; Van de Ven, 1993). (Senge,. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Artz, Norman, Hatfield, & Cardinal, 2010; Salavou, 2002; Prajogo, 2006). 14.

(22) (Kondra & Hurst, 2009; Martin, 2000). (Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Prajogo & McDermott, 2005). 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. (Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Kondra & Hurst, 2009; Prajogo &. Nat. n. al. er. io. sit. y. ‧. McDermott, 2005; Ralston et al., 2006). v i n & Youndt, 2005) C h (Katila, 2002; Subramaniam engchi U. (Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Larson & Christensen, 1993; Stuart & Podolny, 1996). (exploitation) (exploration) 15.

(23) (Crossan et al., 1999; March, 1991). (Molina-Morales & Martínez-Fernández, 2010). …. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. (Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Kondra & Hurst, 2009; Prajogo & McDermott, 2005;. ‧. Zammuto & O’connor, 1992). n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Ralston. et al., 2006) (Molina-Morales & Martínez-Fernández, 2010). (Cabrera & Cabrera, 2002; Lane & Lubatkin, 1998; Molina-Morales & Martínez-Fernández, 2010; Tsai & Ghoshal, 1998). (Li & Atuahene-Gima, 16.

(24) 2002) (Spencer, 2003; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). 2006). 政治大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. (Ralston et al.,. ‧. 2006). (Ralston et al.,. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. v i n Madsen & Desai, 2010; Matusik C(Gold h eetnal.,g2001; i h c U. & Heeley, 2005; Norman, 2004). (acquisition process capability). ( (. ). benchmarking). (Barney, 1991; Gold et al., 2001; Yli-Renko, Autio, & Sapienza, 2001; Anh, Baughn, Hang, & Neupert, 2006; Jansen et al., 2005) 17.

(25) (Ford & Baucus, 1987; López et al., 2004; Leonard & Swap, 2004) (Bontis et al., 2002). (. (. ). ) (Gold et al., 2001; Greve et al., 2009; Tsai, 2001). 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 er. io. sit. y. Nat. (Barney, 1986; Liebeskind, 1996). n. al. 2005). Ch. engchi. v i (Subramaniam n & Youndt, U. (Grant, 1996). (Liebeskind, 1996; Gold et al., 2001; Teece, 1998) (protection process capability). (Gold et al., 18.

(26) 2001). (deferred incentives). (Lee et al., 2007; Liebeskind, 1996). (Edelman et al., 2005). 立. (Barney, 1991) 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 19.

(27) 2. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 2. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. TEJ 2009. 11. 2009. 12. 2008 (Van Buren, 1999;. Joia, 2000; Nazari & Herremans, 2007; Gold et al., 2001) (Cameron & Quinn, 1999). (1). (2). 20.

(28) 2008. 7-11 ( (. ). 3. 24. 331 94. ). 2010. 1048. 02 23 ( ). ( ) 2010. 3 1036 2010 4 政治 1243 大. 504 389. 立. 29 16. 169. 87. 43 t. t=0.263, p=0.511. t=0.043,. ‧. t=0.062, p=0.530. 39. 學. ‧ 國. 22. (t=.973, p=.259). n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. p=0.598. 27. Ch. ( ) Cameron. engchi. i n U. v. Quinn(1999). (translation and back translation). 20. (1 Cameron. 9. ). Quinn(1999). 2008. (aggregate) 21.

(29) James, Demaree. Wolf (1984, 1993). (within-group interrater reliability)Rwg 9. Rwg. 0.77-0.99. Rwg < 0.7(George, 1990) 0.97. (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) ICC(1)=0.290. ICC(2)=0.551. (Schneider, White, & Paul, 1998) 160 Rwg<0.7. 立. 2008. 政治大. (Baron, 1997; Schein, 1992, 2004). ‧. ‧ 國. 學. al. n. (2). sit. (1). i n (Market capitalization C h methods, MCM) engchi U (3). (4). (Direct. er. io. intellectual capita, DIC). y. Nat. ( ). v. (Return on assets, ROA). ROA. (Scorecard). (indicator). (Campisi & Costa, 2008). (Sveiby, 1997, 2000). (. 2. 4). 22.

(30) 7. (. 7) (Lin & Edvisson, 2008; Lin & Whetten, 2008). 2008. 立. 政治大. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 1. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 23.

(31) 2. 1. Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005; 2006. 饋. Ulrich, 1998; Van Buren, 1999. 3. Bontis, 1998;. 4. Dzinkowski, 2000;. 2000. 2005. 5. Bontis, 1998; Bozbura, 2004. 6. Edvinsson & Malone, 1997;. 政治大. (2004). 7. 立. ‧ 國. ). 1999. Edvinsson & Malone, 1997;. y. ). , 2004. sit. io. Belliveau, O’Reilly, & Wade,. al ( ) Ch. n. 3. & Samkin, 2008; Van Buren,. er. (. TEJ. 2004; Chiucchi, 2008; Scheider. Nat. 2. Ax& Marton, 2008; Bozbura,. ‧. (. 2005. 學. 1. Bontis et al., 2000;. v. 1996; Bozbura, 2004; Hogan &. i n U. McPheters, 1980;. e n g c 2005 hi. ,. Bozbura, 2004; Chiucchi, 2008;. TEJ. Edvinsson & Malone, 1997;. 4. Moon & Kym, 2006; Scheider. (. ). & Samkin, 2008; Seetharaman, Low, & Saravanan, 2004 Ax & Marton, 2008; Castro &. 5. ( ). TEJ. Saez, 2008; Chiucchi, 2008; Moon & Kym, 2006; Seetharaman et al., 2004. (. ). 24.

(32) 3. 1. 2004; Chen, Lin, & Chang, 2006. 饋. Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005; 2006. 3. Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005; 2006. 4. …. Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005; 2004. 5. Pablos, 2004; Scheider &. (. Samkin, 2008;. 立. 6. Bontis, 1998; Chen et al., 2006. ‧ 國. Subramaniam & Youndt 2005; Van Buren 1999; 2004. ISO. RoHS). Pablos, 2004; Roos et al., 1997;. Nat. y. 2005. al. n. 3 4. sit. io. 饋. 2004;. Chiucchi, 2008; Seetharaman et. er. (. ‧. 1. 2004. 學. 7. ) 治政大. TEJ. v i n Ch U 2008; Seetharaman et TEJ i e n g c hChiucchi, al., 2004 al., 2004. (. ). Scheider & Samkin, 2008; Pablos, 2004. 5. Lin, 1998; Leavitt, 1964. (. 50. ) (. ). 25.

(33) 4. 1. Chen et al., 2006; 2004. 饋. Bontis,1998; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005. 3. Bozbura, 2004; Brooking, 1996; Castro & Saez, 2008; Chiucchi, 2008; Scheider & Samkin, 2008. 4. Bozbura, 2004; Chen et al.,. 政治大. 2006; Chiucchi, 2008. 5. Bozbura, 2004; Castro & Saez,. Kym, 2006. 2008. Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005; Csstro & Saez, 2008. Nat. y. ). io. al. n. 饋 (. 50. 3. sit. (. TEJ. Haanes & Lowendahl, 1997; Tsai & Ghoshal, 1998; 2005. ,. (TCRI). er. 1. Bozbura, 2004; Castro & Saez,. ‧. 7. 學. 6. iv n U, 2005. Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005;. Ch ) engchi. Acquaah, 2007; Mizruchi &. ( 4. 2008; Chiucchi, 2008; Moon &. ‧ 國. 立. ). Stearns, 1988;. , 2005. Fischer & Pollock, 2004; Phan & Lee, 1995. 5. Acquaah, 2007; Mizruchi & Stearns, 1988. (. ). 26.

(34) ( ) (contingency perspective). Drazin 1985. (fit). Van de Ven. (selection fit, interaction fit, and systems fit). interaction fit (selection fit or congruence, Fry & Smith, 1987). 治政大 1989. (systems fit) Venkatraman. 立. (1). (Degree of specificity of the functional form of fit-based relationship). ‧ 國. 學 ‧. (Choice of anchoring the specification of fit-based -. criterion-specific. Fit as Moderation (moderator). n. al. Ch. Fry & Smith, 1987; Venkatraman, 1989). engchi. er. io. sit. y. Nat. relationship). (2). (Drazin & Van de Ven, 1985;. i n U. v. ( ) Gold. 2001. (translation and back translation). 14 (1. ). 2008. 7 fit as moderation. 27.

(35) ( ) 2008 2008. 2009. 6. TEJ (Al-Tamimi, 2010; Bullen & Eyler, 2010). (. ( ). 立. 1.908. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 2008. sit. y. Nat. (0,1). er. (1,0). io. (Bontis et al., 2002; Chatman & Jehn, 1994; Youndt & Snell,. al. n. (0,0). ). 政治大. TEJ log. 63.61. 2004). Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (outlier) (Shiffler, 1988; Stevens, 1990; Pedhazur, 1997). SEM. (Hinkin,. 1998) 28.

(36) Aiken. West(1991). (centering). VIF (Hair, Anderson, Tatham. 10. Black, 1995). 169. 9 43 治 36 政大 9. 160. 立. 1507.6. 47. 500 26. 47. 15.4. 89,687,253. 30 500. 343,499,730. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 36. 100-500. ‧. 10-20. 200. 12. 學. ‧ 國. 771. 81. Ch 5. e n g: c160h i. 43. 36. i n U. v. 81. :9. : 12. 771. 89,687. 26.7. <100. 33. 21. <10. 22. 14. <200. 59. 36. 100-500. 75. 47. 10-20. 47. 29. 200-500. 30. 19. 501-1000. 24. 15. 21-30. 29. 18. 501-1000. 21. 13. 1001-5000. 24. 15. 31-40. 30. 19. 1001-5000. 30. 19. >5000. 4. 2. >41. 32. 20. >5000. 20. 13 29.

(37) Conway. Huffcutt (2003). 0.4. (cross loading) (. 6. 8. ). (. ). ( (. ). ). ( ( ). ) 政 (治大. ( ). 學. ‧ 國. 立. ). (Clarkson, 1995;. 2009). ‧ sit. y. Nat. (House,. io. n. al. er. Hanges, Ruiz-Quintanilla, Dorfman, Javidan, Dickson, & Associates, 1999). Ch. 9. engchi. i n U. v. RMSEA = 0.00 NNFI = 0.88 0.74. GFI= 0.89 AGFI=. (Browne & Cudeck, 1993; Jöreskog & Sörbom,. 1993). 10. (Quinn et al., 1996; Ulrich, 1998; Campisi & Costa, 2008). 30.

(38) 0.5. Jöreskog. Sörbom(1993) 1 1. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 31.

(39) 6. _. 1.. .680. .059. .311. 2.. .845. .132. .254. 3.. .582. .215. .171. 4.. .834. .197. .124. 5.. .738. .288. .092. 6.. .776. .269. .144. .304. .758. .106. .386. .695. .163. .128. .763. .313. .113. .299. .732. .194. .790. 11.. …. 12. (. ). 立. ‧. Nat. %. io. .723. 1.000. 7.923. 1.282. 46.604. 60.031. n. al. .058. y. .280. sit. 17.. .242. 52.489. er. 16.. 學. 15.. ‧ 國. 14.. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 32.

(40) 7. _. 1.. .740. .008. .752. .058. 3.. .852. .034. 4.. .852. .096. .823. .056. 6.. .686. .105. 8.. .736. .023. .039. .776. .130. .994. .056. .851. (. ). 9. 10.. 立. 11.. .139. .696. .093. .809. .082. .772. 7.445. 1.801. ‧. 14.. ‧ 國. 13.. 學. 12.. 政治大. Nat. y. 5.. (feedback). %. io. n. al. 57.268. sit. 2.. ). 71.125. er. ( :. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 33.

(41) 8. :. .876. .204. .239. .075. .044. .766. .297. .064. 政 .117治大.869. .274. .010. .207. 041. .788. .054. .841. .064. .303. v. .791. .073. .109. .343. .729. .091. .031. .089. .023. .950. .039. .067. .085. .945. 1.088. 1.847. 4.515. 1.275. 79.327. 57.840. 41.047. 69.435. :. :. 立. :. :. io. :. 20.. al. n. 13.. :. :. 8.. :. %. .831. .166. .146. .125. .178. ‧. Nat. 5.. .226. 學. :. ‧ 國. 16.. 3.. .022. :. 11.. 2.. .144. Ch. .148. engchi. y. 4.. .101. sit. 15.. .921. er. 1.. _. i n U. 34.

(42) 9 Factor loading 1.. 0.68. 2.. 0.86. 3.. 0.66. 4.. 0.83. 5.. 0.76. 6.. 0.79. 11.. y. 0.80 0.82. al. n. 6.. 0.77. (feedback). 4. 5.. 0.66. io. 3.. (. .761. ‧. 2.. 0.78. Nat. 1.. 0.78. sit. 17.. .789. 0.80. ‧ 國. 16.. 立. 0.76. 學. 15.. ) 政治大. (. 14.. .900. 0.71. er. 12.. …. Cronbach's Alpha. Ch. ). engchi U. v ni. 0.77 0.84. .916. 0.74. 8.. 0.73. 9.. .78. 10.. .86. 11.. .81. 12.. .79. 13.. .87. 14.. .84. .931. 35.

(43) 9 Factor loading 0.68. :. 15.. 11.. .89. :. :. 立. :. .72. .80. Nat. y. .82. al. n. :. io. 8.. .83. :. 20.. 3.. 政治大. ‧. 13.. :. .841. 學. 5.. ‧ 國. 16.. 2.. .851. .71. :. sit. 4.. 0.85. :. er. 1.. Cronbach's Alpha. Ch. n U engchi. iv. .854. .73. .87. :. :. .88. .891. 36.

(44) 10. 1. (. ). 3.. 4.. 5.. 6.. 7.. 8.. 4.33. .57. 2.. 3.59. .72. .542**. 3.. 3.64. .71. .491**. .687**. 5.93. 1.12. .188*. -.054. -.067. 5.. 6.14. .90. .209**. .030. .009. .410**. 6.. 5.64. 1.58. -.120. -.185*. -.183*. .048. -.030. 7.. 6.85. .78. .265**. .190*. .177*. .491**. .595**. -.036. 5.15. .90. .450**. .393**. .370**. .100. .247**. -.106. .024. 5.20. 1.02. .292**. ‧ 國. 1.. 2.. .396**. .299**. .048. .014. -.037. -.012. .612**. .00. .89. .294**. .423**. .366**. -.125. .047. -.091. .064. .073. .110. -.002. .148. -.395**. .230**. -.048. -.104. -.556**. -.078. -.038. -.095. .183*. 9. (Z. ). 1 (dummy). 0.27. .445. .121. .255**. 12.. 2 (dummy). 0.22. .419. .111. .107. 2.46. .58. .173*. .443**. .531**. -.134. 26.68. 15.35. .124. .144. .274**. 5.47. .81. .292**. .242**. .305**. Ch. 13.. (log). 14. 15.. *: P< 0.05. (log). io. 11.. n. Nat. 10.. 立. .190*. al. -.042. .477**. engchi U. y. ). 12.. 13. 14.. ‧. (. 11.. 學. 8.. ). sit. (. 10.. 政治大. v i n. -.011. .103. .065. .091. -.023. -.024. .141. -.327**. .144. .059. .105. -.323**. -.122. er. 4.. 9.. .033. -.293**. .194*. -.031. -.013. .027. -.397**. .060. .530**. .484**. -.149. .650**. .140. .014. .096. -.206**. .055. .241**. .285**. **: P< 0.01. 37.

(45) (. 11) Model1. Model 2 - Model 4. Model5. Aiken. West (1991). / ( (. 3 20). (Gerge & Zhou, 2007). ‧. (simple slope test). (Aiken. n. al. (. sit er. io Model 5. West. y. Nat. &West, 1991; Hitt et al., 2001; Huang & Iun, 2006). 11. Aiken. 學. ‧ 國. 4). 治政大 Model3 立. 12 -. Model2. (1991). /. 6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20&22). Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 3. 4. 38.

(46) 11. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. Model4. Model5. .160† .216* .140 -.140 .057. .069 .069 -.125 -.039 .044. .291† .380* .097 -.144 .111. .142 .166† -.140 -.046 .013. .064 .155 -.061 -.055 .054. .154† .284** .164† -.175†. .118 .292** .201† -.134. -.013 .097 .133. -.111 .064 .071. 1 2. .153 治政 .297** 大 †. 立. .176†. y. sit. n. al. er. io. x x x x x x. Nat. x x x. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. -.209† .032 .072 .232†. R2 Adj-R2 Model F. Ch. engchi. .061 .031 2.016†. .234 .193 5.752**. i n U. v. .108 .054 2.011*. .262 .202 4.348**. -.056 -.221† .063 .147 .084 .056 -.124 .276** -.115 .378 .283 3.991**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 39.

(47) t=2.947, p<0.00. t=2.358, p<0.05. 3. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. t=6.748, p<0.00. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. t=0.981, p=0.33. 4. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 12 Model 2. Model 3. 5. 6 40.

(48) (. ). 7. 8 (. 立. 政治大. 學. (. 9). 13. ‧. ‧ 國. ). n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. C h10 engchi. i n U. v. 11. (. 12). 41.

(49) 12. 1 2. 立. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. .160† .216* .140 -.140 .057. .158 .112 -.168 -.036 -.019. .159 .135 -.162 -.067 .020. .062 .328** .230* -.209* .149 .144 -.104 -.071 -.192*. .055 .332** .298** -.257** .158 .138 -.097 -.105 -.225*. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat x x x. Ch. engchi U. v ni. -.186* .160† .165†. x. -.170*. -.026 .167†. x. x x. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. .242* .061 .031 2.016†. .340 .265 4.034**. .201* .341 .257 4.062**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 42.

(50) <. >. t=2.534, p<0.05. t=3.799, p<0.00. <. 立. >. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. t=2.534, p<0.05. ‧. t=3.895, p<0.00. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 5. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 6 43.

(51) <. >. t=2.803, p<0.00. t=2.033, p<0.05. <. 立. 政治 >大. ‧ 國. 學. t=3.023, p<0.00. ‧. t=0.140, p=0.88. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 7. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 8 44.

(52) 13. 1 2. 立. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. .160 .216† .140 -.140 .057. .167 .146 -.161 -.038 .011. .174 .160 -.206 -.058 .018. .074 .333** .185 -.139 -.164 .113 .173 -.104 -.168†. .105 .345** .284* -.140 -.120 .131 .135 -.075 -.243*. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. x x. -.096 .077 .222*. er. io. sit. y. Nat x x. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. -.052 -.017. x. x x. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. -.044. .325** .061 .031 2.016†. .353 .271 4.276**. .177* .320 .233 3.681**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 45.

(53) <. >. t=4.420, p<0.00. t=4.459, p<0.00. <. 立. >. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. t=3.547, p<0.00. ‧. t=-1.051, p=0.29. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 9. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 10 46.

(54) <. >. t=0.751, p=0.45. t=3.315, p<0.00. <. 立. >. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. t=2.650, p<0.00. ‧. t=1.887, p=0.061. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 11. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 12 47.

(55) 14 Model2. 13. (. 15). 立. 政治大. 16 Model 2. 學. 15. (. sit. n. al. er. io. (. 16). y. Nat (. ‧. ‧ 國. (. 14). Ch. engchi. 17 Model2). i n U (. v. 17). 18). 48.

(56) 14. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. .160 .216† .140 -.140 .057. .149 .147 -.163 -.029 .020. .136 .145 -.163 -.063 .032. .024 .348** .226* -.112 -.079 .050 .153 -.065 -.184†. .101 .368** .246* -.137 -.062 .079 .103 -.071 -.242*. 1 2. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat x x x. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. .000 .106 .084. x. .044. -.053 -.023. x. x x. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. .239** .061 .031 2.016†. .331 .246 3.874**. .144 .305 .216 3.439**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 49.

(57) <. >. t=2.908, p<0.00. t=3.881, p<0.00. <. 立. >. 政治大 t=1.981, p<0.05. ‧ 國. 學 t=-0.703, p=0.48. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 13. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 14 50.

(58) 15. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. .160 .216† .140 -.140 .057. .178 .140 -.176 -.088 -.008. .137 .116 -.166 -.071 .012. .076 .345** .277* -.129 -.089 .127 .146 -.090 -.184†. .100 .365** .235† -.142 -.065 .125 .098 -.064 -.236*. 1 2. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat x x x. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. .126 .053 -.178†. x. .026. -.046 -.090. x. x x. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. -.113 .061 .031 2.016†. .325 .239 3.768**. -.090 .307 .218 3.465**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 51.

(59) 16. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. .160 .216† .140 -.140 .057. .132 .169 -.119 -.043 .027. .127 .134 -.188† -.033 -.003. 政治大. .103 .284* .124 -.112 -.212† .110 .189 -.168 -.195†. .115 .364** .201† -.068 -.079. 1 2. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat x x. .076 .101 -.076 -.218*. x. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. -.019 .081 .150. x. .187†. -.149† .010. x. x x. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. .450** .061 .031 2.016†. .415 .340 5.546**. .054 .329 .243 3.837**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 52.

(60) <. >. t=-1.367, p=0.174 t=3.806, p<0.00. <. 立. >. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. t=7.856, p<0.00. ‧. t=-0.499, p=0.619. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 15. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 16 53.

(61) 17. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. .160 .216† .140 -.140 .057. .093 .143 -.134 -.043 .039. .085 .126 -.159 -.043 .027. 政治大. .109 .218* .214† -.136 -.055 .009 .121 -.059 -.177†. .127 .359** .223*. 1 2. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat x x. -.135 -.050 .035 .091 -.089 -.187†. x. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. .143 .107 .005. x. .223*. -.007 -.095. x. x x. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. .246** .061 .031 2.016†. .371 .290 4.614**. .089 .343 .259 4.091**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 54.

(62) <. >. t=.942, p=.348. t=7.187, p<0.00. <. 立. >. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. t=2.016, p<0.05. t=.549, p=.584. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 17. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 18 55.

(63) 18 (. 19). 21. ( 22) 19. 20. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 21. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 56.

(64) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 57.

(65) 18. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. .160 .216† .140 -.140 .057. .182 .186 -.162 -.076 -.019. .143 .130 -.160 -.073 -.009. .123 .342** .151 -.126 -.092 .129 .202† -.090 -.218*. .110 .403** .150 -.120 -.085 .147 .138. 1 2. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat x x. -.062 -.300**. x. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. -.031 .123 -.075. x. -.085. -.051 .130. x. x x. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. -.205* .061 .031 2.016†. .346 .262 4.138**. -.212* .331 .246 3.876**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 58.

(66) <. >. t=5.910, p<0.00. t=1.817, p=0.07. <. 立. >. 政治大 t=1.223, p=.223. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. t=1.627, p=.106. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 19. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 20. 59.

(67) <. >. t=5.661, p<0.00. t=0.715, p=0.476. <. 立. >. 政治大 t=0.865, p=0.39. ‧ 國. 學 t=3.533, p<0.00. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 21. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 22 60.

(68) 19. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. .160 .216† .140 -.140 .057. .116 .196† -.142 -.047 .055. .115 .183 -.124 -.050 .050. 政治大. .082 .315** .195† -.093 -.108 .046 .157 -.042 -.139. .102 .313** .249**. 1 2. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat x x. -.070 -.133 .075 .148 -.098 -.111. x. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. .199* .219** -.001. x. .324**. .205* -.092. x. x x. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. .108 .061 .031 2.016†. .390 .312 5.012**. .010 .395 .317 5.107**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 61.

(69) 20. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. .160 .216† .140 -.140 .057. .168 .193 -.208† -.049 .058. .139 .151 -.190 -.035 .033. 政治大. .078 .321** .239* -.145 -.107 .119 .147 -.008 -.156†. .084 .346** .273* -.128 -.082 .116 .118 -.040 -.165†. 1 2. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat x x x. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. .057 .281** -.007. x. .038. .174* -.020. x. x x. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. .091 .061 .031 2.016†. .346 .262 4.137**. .110 .323 .237 3.744**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 62.

(70) 21. x x x. H1 & H10 H2 & H10 H3 & H10. x x x. H1 & H10. x x x x. H1 & H10 H1 & H10 H2 & H10 H3 & H10. H2 & H10 H3 & H10. x. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. x x. H1 & H11. sit. n. Ch. n U engchi. iv. H5 & H10 H6 & H10 H7 & H10. x x. H5 & H10 H6 & H10. x x. H7 & H11 H7 & H11 (. x. al. er. io. x x x. H1 & H11 H2 & H11. y. Nat. x x. H1 & H11 H2 & H11. : H8-H9 &. : H10-H11) H8. 63.

(71) 22. H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7. 立. H8. 政治大. H10 H11. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. H9. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Chatman & Jehn, 1994; Dastmalchian, Lee, & Ng, 2000; Grthrie & Datta, 2008; Yli-Renko et al., 2001). (43. ). (36. ). (81. ) (. p=0.149. : t=-0.048. p=0.962. : t=-1.446. : t=-1.433, p=.158). 64.

(72) 23. 43. 36. 81. 838 治政 36.7 28.3 大. 1131. 立36,976. 20.6 11,738. 328,031. 24. Model 2. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 y. Nat. 23. io. n. al. sit. 25). er. (. 550. Ch. 24. engchi. i n U. v. 26 (. ). 25. ( ) 65.

(73) (. 27 Model 2). 26. ( (. 28 Model 3). 29 Model 3). 28 30. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 30. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 66.

(74) 24. _. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. Model4. Model5. .451* -.177 .087. .092 -.076 .067. .438* -.189 .101. .107 -.086 .084. .028 -.077 .241. -.132 .497 .060 -.053 -.034 .069 .044. -.084 .505 .007 -.081 -.126 .054 .119. -.166 .518* .091. 政治大 -.127. 立. y. sit. n. al. er. io. R2 Adj-R2 Model F. Nat. x x x x x x x x. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. x. -.049 .154 .097. Ch. engchi. .188 .126 3.019*. .319 .205 2.805*. i n U. v. .215 .058 1.368. .323 .111 1.527. -.052 -.116 -.069 -.056 .067 -.087 -.024 .507 .165 .465 .022 1.051. †:p<0.1; **:p<0.05; ***:p<0.01 :. 67.

(75) 25. _. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. Model4. Model5. .161 -.542* .169. -.093 -.258 .077. .151 -.531* .153. -.064 -.285 .069. .021 -.344 .135. .088 .305 .223 -.167 -.121 .361 -.103. -.187 .612* .410* -.149 -.222 .225 -.133. .107 .255 .188. 立. -.002 .219 -.003. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. x x x x x x x x. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. x. 政治大 -.174. R2 Adj-R2 Model F. Ch. engchi. .209 .134 2.811†. .385 .257 3.021*. i n U. v. .240 .050 1.262. .445 .223 2.007†. -.234 .217 .286 .384 -.677* .646* -.051 -.016 -.224 .858 .689 5.088**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 68.

(76) t=1.936, p=0.062. t=2.288, p<0.05. 23. _. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. t=4.369, p<0.00. t=0.971, p=.339. _. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 24. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. t=2.995, p<0.00. t=2.070, p<0.05. 25. _. 69.

(77) 26. _. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. Model4. Model5. -.009 .161 -.134. -.040 .177 -.198. -.055 .106 .077. -.100 .109 .047. -.093 .246* -.008. .231† .079 -.037 -.275† -.056 -.082 .120. .170 .082 -.034 -.163 -.194 -.001 .143. .183 .140 -.082. 立. -.058 -.049 .161. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. x x x x x x x x. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. x. 政治大 -.238. R2 Adj-R2 Model F. Ch. engchi. .035 -.002 .944. .089 .016 1.212. i n U. v. .103 .017 1.199. .160 .040 1.334. -.094 -.158 -.090 .045 .096 -.138 .300* .297* -.255 .412 .228 2.246**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 70.

(78) 27. _. Model 2. Model3. .161 -.542* .169. -.186 -.018 -.130. -.066 -.202 -.060. .065 .143 .241 -.311 .016 .197 .158 .364. .049 .179 .399 -.100 -.148 .195 -.039 .080. ‧. 立. Model 1. -.049. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. -.363. sit. n. x. al. x. x x. Ch. engchi. i n U. x x R2 Adj-R2 Model F. -.018 .584* .044. .434. er. io x. y. Nat. x x. v. .191 -.344. .564* .209 .134 2.811†. .698 .444 2.743*. .194 .619 .299 1.932†. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 71.

(79) <. >. t=1.495, p=.139. t=0.832, p=0.148. > 政治大. <. 立. ‧ 國. 學. t=2.124, p<0.05. ‧. t=0.970, p=0.340. sit. n. al. er. io. 27. _. y. Nat 26. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. _ 72.

(80) 28. _. 立. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. -.009 .161 -.134. -.163 .140 .087. -.167 .070 .151. .378** .103 .237 -.357** -.454** .258† .123 -.436** -.143. .290** .080 .218 -.353** -.327** .172. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. x. al. x. x x. Ch. engchi. i n U. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. -.466** .003 .422**. -.380**. er. io x. sit. y. Nat. x x. .134 -.467** -.102. v. -.059 .221*. .157 .035 -.002 .944. .466 .333 3.492**. .346** .543 .428 4.746**. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 73.

(81) <. >. t=-1.177, p=.243. t=.485, p=.629. <. 立. > 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. t=5.294, p<0.00. ‧. t=-1.792, p=0.077. sit er. al. n. 29. io. _. y. Nat. 28. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. _ 74.

(82) 29. _. 立. Model 1. Model 2. Model3. -.009 .161 -.134. -.184 .020 .095. -.176 .030 .105. .305* .168 .212 -.284† -.236 .068 .099 -.388* -.131. .282* .179 .169 -.259† -.214 .036 .079 -.316* -.147. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. x. al. x. x x. Ch. engchi. i n U. x x 2. R Adj-R2 Model F. .097 -.068 -.137. .099. er. io x. sit. y. Nat. x x. v. -.021 -.066. -.161 .035 -.002 .944. .335 .168 2.011*. -.265* .347 .184 2.127*. †:p<0.1; *:p<0.05; **:p<0.01 :. 75.

(83) <. >. t=-.317, p=.752. t=2.527, p<0.05. > 政治大. <. 立. ‧ 國. 學. t=3.450, p<0.00. ‧. t=-.955, p=.343. sit er. al. n. 31. io. _. y. Nat. 30. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. _ 76.

(84) 30. (. ). x. H5. x. H6 x. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. x. H8 & H10. x. H7. ‧. x. H3 & H11. sit. y. Nat. io. n. al. H4 & H11. er. x x. H7. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. H4 & H11. 77.

(85) ( ) 1. 立. 政: 治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. (Brockman & Morgan, 2006; Simberova, 2009). Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Liebeskind, 1996; Grant, 1996) 78.

(86) (Ramirez & Li, 2009). (Hitt et al. 2001). (Cameron & Quinn, 1999). 立. 政治大. Deshpandé. (1993). ‧. ‧ 國. 學 (Anderson, Banker, & Janakiraman,. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. capitalism). (crony. 2003; Lins & Servaes, 2002;. Ch. engchi. v i2008) n U. (Deshpandé et al.,. 1993; Brockman & Morgan, 2006; Simberova, 2009). (Howard, 1998; Goodman et al., 2001) (Cameron & Quinn, 1999; Lund, 2003). 2. : 79.

(87) (Cameron et al., 2007; Kondra & Hurst, 2009; Ralston et al., 2006; Hitt et al., 2001; Zheng, 2010). (Gold et al., 2001). 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. (Reed et al., 2006). Ch. (Reus, Ranft, & Adams, 2009). engchi. i n U. v. (Liebeskind, 1996; Grant, 1996). (Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005) (Ketkar. & Sett, 2010; Wright & Snell, 1998) (Ramirex & Li, 2009). 80.

(88) (Miller, Fern, & Cardinal, 2007). 3. :. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. (Kondra & Hurst, 2009; Prajogo & McDermott, 2005; Ralston. ‧. et al., 2006). n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Gold et al., 2001; Greve et al., 2009; Ralston et al., 2006). 4. :. (Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). 81.

(89) ( ) 1. :. (Ketkar & Sett, 2010; Wright & Snell, 1998) (Gold et al., 2001; Reus et al., 2009). 2. 立. 政: 治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Barney, 1991). 3. :. (Jansen et al. 2005; Todorova & Durisin, 82.

(90) 2007). (Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). (Stuart & Podolny, 1996). 立. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. (Liebeskind, 1996;. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Grant, 1996). 政治大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. ( ) 1. :. (Molina-Morales & Martínez-Fernández, 2010) 83.

(91) (Bontis, 1999; Campisi & Costa, 2008; Hitt et al., 2001; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005) (Gold et al., 2001). 2. (Miller et al., 2007;. 學. ‧ 國. 立. : 政治大. Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. ( ). Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005) (. ). 84.

(92) 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. : ( ). : 85.

(93) 1982. (Dankbaar, 1997;. Shah & Ward, 2003; Han & Liao, 2010). ( ). :. 立. 政治大(Skaggs & Youndt, 2004). ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. (Katila, 2002; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). 25. ( ). Ch 85. engchi. i n U. v. 5. (Reichheld & Sasser, 1990). :. 86.

(94) (Stuart & Podolny, 1996; Subramaniam & Youndt, 2005). 立. al., 2005). 治 (Barney, 1991) 政 (Lee et al., 2007; 大 Liebeskind, 1996; Edelman et. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. ( ). Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 87.

(95) 立. (Barney,. ‧ 國. 學. 2001). 政治大. ‧. (Cameron, 1986; Buenger, et. y. sit. io. n. al. er. 2006). Nat. al., 1996; Denison & Spreitzer, 1991; Livari & Huisman, 2007; Ralston et al.,. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Denison, 1996; Ginsberg, 1994; Oliver, 1997) (Child, 1981; Greve et al., 2009). (Barney, 1991) 88.

(96) Hitt. 2001. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Cameron & Quinn, 1999) Cameron. (. Quinn. 31) 89.

(97) (Reus et al. , 2009). (Goodman et al., 2001). 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 90.

(98) 31. ( 禛. ( 禛. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 91.

(99) (Barney, 1991; Ray et al., 2004). 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 er. io. sit. y. Nat (McClelland & Judd, 1993). n. al. Ch. 2007) (2) (subculture). (1). engchi. i n U. v. (George & Zhou,. (Saffold, 1988). Cameron. Quinn. 1999. (3) (Podsakoff & Organ, 1986). 92.

(100) (Aiken & West, 1991). (4) (. 81. 43. 36. ). (5). 2009. 2008. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. (contextual performance (Borman & Motowidlo, 1993; Organ, 1988). ‧. ). sit. y. Nat. io. er. (Alavi, Kayworth, & Leidner, 2006; Gupta, Iyer, & Aronson, 2000; Kitchell, 1995; McDermott & Stock, 1999). n. al. ?. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. (Gold et al., 2001). 93.

(101) 政治大. 立. n. al. er. io. (2000). http://www.ticrc.nccu.edu.tw/index.htm. sit. Nat. (2004). y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. ( ). (2005). 24(1). Ch. 55-81.. engchi. i n U. v. (2002) 21(3) 69-96 (2006) 14(1) 43-78. (2005). (2008) 27(4), 29-56. (2009) 26(1), 213-231.. 94.

(102) ( ) Acquaah, M. (2007). Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1235-1255. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administerative costs “Sticky”?, Journal of Accounting Research, 41 (March), 47-63. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Alavi, M., Kayworth, T. R., & Leidner, D. E. (2006). An empirical examination of the influence of organizational culture on knowledge management practices, Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 191-224. Al-Tamimi, H. A. H. (2010). Factors influencing performance of the uae Islamic and conventional national bank, Global Journal of Business Research, 4(2), 1-9. Anh, P. T. T., Baughn, C. C., Hang, N. T. M., & Neupert, K. E. (2006). Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in internationall joint ventures: An empirical study in Vietnam, International Business Review, 15, 463-487. Armstrong, M. (2003). A handbook of human resource management practice (the ninth edition). London: Kogan Page. Arogyaswamy, B., & Byles, C. M. (1987). Organizational culture: Internal and external congruences, Journal of Management, 13(4), 647-659. Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance, Journal of innovation management, 27, 725-740. Ax, C., & Marton, J. (2008). Human capital disclosures and management practices, Journal of intellectual capital, 9(3), 433-455. Aycan, Z. (2005). The interplay between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management practices, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(7), 1083–1119. Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11, 656-665. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Baron, R. A. (1997). Behavior in organizations. 7th(ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Belliveau, M. A., O’Reilly, C. A., & Wade, J. B. (1996). Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation, Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1568-1593.. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 95.

(103) Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36(2): 63-76. Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field, International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5), 433-462. Bontis, N., Keow, W. C. C., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian Industries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100. Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., & Hulland, J. (2002). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flow, Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 437-469. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98), New York: Jossey-Bass. Bozbura, F. T. (2004). Measurement and application of intellectual capital in Turkey, The Learning Organization. 11(4/5), 357-367. Brockman, B. K., & Morgan, R. M. (2006). The moderating effect of organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product development, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 295-307. Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual capital, core asset for the third millennium enterprise, International Thomson Business Press, USA. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Bruggen, A., Vergauwen, P., & Dao, M. (2009). Determinants of intellectual capital disclosure: Evidence from Australia, Management Decision, 47(2), 223-245. Buenger, V., Daft, R. L., Colon, E. J., & Austin, J. (1996). Competing values in organizations: Contextual influences and structural consequences, Organization Science, 7(5), 557-576. Bullen, M. L., & Eyler, K. A. (2010). Human resource accounting and international developments: implications for measurement of human capital, Journal of International Business & Cultural Studies, 3, 1-16. Bukh, P. N. (2003). The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: A paradox? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(1), 49-56. Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas, Organization Studies, 23(5), 687–710. Campisi, D., & Costa, R. (2008). A DEA-based method to enhance intellectual capital management, Knowledge and Process Management, 15(3), 170-183.. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 96.

(104) Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness, Management Science, 32(5), 539-553. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework, Addison-Wesley Press. Cameron, K. S., Quinn, R. E., Degraff, J., & Thakor, A. (2007). Competing values leadership: Creating value in organizations. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2004). The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1257–1278. Castro, G. M., & Saez, P. L. (2008). Intellectual capital in high-tech firms: The case of Spain, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(1), 25-36. Chan, L.L.M., Shaffer, M. A., & Snape, E. (2004). In search of sustained competitive advantage: The impact of organizational culture, competitive strategy and human resource management practices on firm performance, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1), 17-35. Chatman, J. A., & Jehn, K. A. (1994). Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be? Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 522-553. Chatman, J. A., & Spataro, S. E. (2005). Using self-categorization theory to understand relational demography-based variations in people's responsiveness to organizational culture, Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 321-331. Chen, Y. S., Lin, M. J. J., & Chang, C. H. (2006). The influence of intellectual capital on new product development performance: The manufacturing companies of Taiwan as an example, Total Quality Management, 17(10), 1323-1339. Child, J. (1981). Culture, contingency and capitalism in the cross-national study of organizations, Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 303–356. Chiucchi, M. S. (2008). Exploring the benecongruences of measuring intellectual capital: The Aimag case study, Human Systems Management, 27, 217-230. Chow, I. H. S., & Liu, S. S. (2009). The effect of aligning organizational culture and business stratedy with HR systems on firm performance in Chinese enterprises, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(11), 2292-2310.. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. Clarkson, B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117. Cohen, S., & Kaimenakis, N. (2007). Intellectual capital and corporate performance in knowledge-intensive SMEs, The Learning Organization, 14(3), 241-262. 97.

(105) Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research, Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 147-168. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution, Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537. Dankbaar, B. (1997). Lean production: Denial, confirmation or extension of sociotechnical systems design? Human Resource, 50(5): 567-583. Dastmalchian, A., Lee, S., & Ng, I. (2000). The interplay between organizational and national cultures: a comparison of organizational practices in Canada and South Korea using the Competing Values Framework, The International Joumal of Human Resource Management, 11(2), 388-412. Davidson, C., & Voss, P. (2002). Knowledge management: An introduction to creating competitive advantage from intellectual capital. Tandem Press. New Zealand. DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 953-979. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and prganizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars, Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 619-654. Denison, D. R., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). Organizational culture and organizational development: A competing values approach, Organizational Change and development, 5, 1-21. Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A quadrad analysis, Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23-37. Deshpand´e, R, & Farley J.U. (2004). Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness, and firm performance: an international research odyssey. International, Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(1), 3–22. Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field, American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514-539. Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann. Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The value of intellectual capital, The Journal of Business Strategy, 21(4), 3-5. Edelman, L. F., Brush, G. B., & Manolova, T. (2005). Co-alignment in the. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 98.

(106) resource-performance relationship: Strategy as mediator, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 359-383. Edvinssion, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capital at Skandia, Long Range Panning, 30 (June), 366-373. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital, N.Y.: Harper Collins. Eker, M., & Eker, S. (2009). An empirical analysis of associateon between the organizational culture and performance management systems in the Turkish manufacturing sector, Journal of Economic and sociall Research, 11(2), 43-76. Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and leader-member exchange: The moderating role of organizational culture, Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 395-406. Fischer, H. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2004). Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings, Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4), 463-481. Ford, J. D., & Baucus, D. A. (1987). Organizational adaptation to performance downturns: An interpretation=based perspective, Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 366-380. Fry, L. W., & Smith, D. A. (1987). Congruence, contingency, and theory building, Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 117-132. Galbraith, J. K. (1969). The new industrial state, Harmondsworth: Penguin. Garcia-Ayuso, M. (2003). Intangibles: Lessons from the past and a look into future, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 597-604. George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behaveor in group, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaveors to wmployee creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-522. Ginsberg, A. (1994). Minding the competition: From mapping to mastery, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 153−174 (Winter Special Issue). Goh, P. C. (2005). Intellectual capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(3), 385-397. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214. Goodman, E. A., Zammuto, R. F., & Gifford, B. D. (2001). The competeng values framework: Understanding the impact of organizational culture on the quality of work life, Organization Development Journal, 19(3), 58-68. Grthrie, J. P., & Datta, D. K., (2008). Dumb and dumber: The impact of downsizeing. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 99.

(107) on firm performance as moderated by Industry conditions, Organization Science, 19(1), 108-185. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (winter special issue), 109-122. Greve, G., Engelen, A., & Brettel, M. (2009). An integrative view on absorptive capacity and national culture, International Journal of Business Studies, 17(1), 19-43. Gupta, B., Iyer, L. S., & Aronson, J. E. (2000). Knowledge management: Practice and challenges, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(1), 17-21. Haanes, K., & Lowendahl, B. (1997). The unit of activity: Towards an alternative to the theories of the firm. In Thomas, H. et al. (Eds) Strategy, structure and style, Copenhagen: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate. 政治大. data analysis with reading. New York: Macmillan. Han, T. S., & Liao, W. C. (2010). Computer-integrated manufacturing and high performance work system: The case of Taiwan, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(1-3), 434-454. Herremans, I. M., & Isaac, R. G. (2004). The intellectual capital realization process (ICRP): An application of the resource-based view of the firm, Journal of Management Issues, XVI(2), 217-231. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires, Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121. Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Koghhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13-28. Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2002). The essence of strategic leadership: Managing human and sociall capital, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 3-14. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in Work-Related Value, Sage, Beverly Hills. Hogan, T. D., & McPheters, L. R. (1980). Executive compensation: Performance versus personal characteristics, Southern Economic Journal, 46(4), 1060-1068. Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2002).Knowledge management: A threefold framework, The Information Society, 18, 47-64. House, RJ, Hanges, PJ, Ruiz-Quintanilla, SA, Dorfman, PW, Javidan, M., Dickson, M., & Associates (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. In WH Mobley, MJ. Gessner, & V. Arnold (Eds.), Advances in. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 100.

(108) global leadership (pp. 171-233). Howard, L. W. (1998). Validating the competing value model as a representation of organizational culture, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 6(July), 231-250. Huang, X., & Iun, J. (2006). The impact of subordinate-supervisor similarity in growth-need strength on work outcomes: The mediating role of perceived similarity, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1121-1148. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures, Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115. Huang, Y. C., & Wu, Y. C. (2010). Intellectual capital and knowledge productivety: the Taiwan biotech industry, Management Decision, 48(4), 580-599. Isaac, R. G., Herremans, I. M., & Kline, T. J. (2009). Intellectual capital management enabler: A structural equation modeling analysis, Journal of Bisiness Ethics, 93, 373-391. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., &Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., &Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement, Journal pf Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306-309. Jansen, J. P., Van Den Bosch, A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potentiall and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015. Joia, L. A. (2000). Measuring intangible corporate assets: Linking business strategy with intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual capital, 1(1), 68-84.. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. i n U. v. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: User’s reference guide, Chicago, IL: Scientific Software Kang, S. C., & Snell, S. A. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management, Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 65-92. Katila, R. (2002). New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45, 995-1010 Kayworth, T., & Leidner, D. (2003). Organizational culture as a knowledge resource. In Holsapple, C. W. (Eds.), Handbook on knowledge management, NY, Berlin. Ketkar, S., & Sett, P. K. (2010). Environmental dynamism, human resource flexibility, and firm performance: Analysis of a multi-level causal model, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(8), 1173-1206. Kitchell, S. (1995). Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovateion adoption: A qualitative/quantitative approach, Journal of the Academy of. engchi. 101.

(109) Marketing Science, 23(3): 195-205. Kondra, A. Z., & Hurst, D. C. (2009). Institutional processes of organizational culture, Culture and Organization, 15(1), 39-58. Kotter, J., & Heskett, J. (1992). Corporate culture and performance, New York: The Free Press. Kujansivu, P., & Lonnqvist, A. (2008). Business process management as a tool for intellectual capital management, Knowledge and Process Management, 15(3), 159-169. Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2004). Validating the competing values model as a representation of organizational culture through inter-institutional comparisons, Organizational Analysis, 12(1), 21–39. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461–477. Larson, J. R., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition, British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30. Leavitt, H. J. (1964). Applied organization change in industry: Structural, technicall, and human approach, in New perspectives in organization research. (Eds). W.W. Cooper, H.J. Leavitt, and M.W. Shelly, II. New York: John Wiley. Lee, S. C., Chang, S. N., Liu, C. Y., & Yang, J. (2007). The effect of knowledge protection, knowledge amniguity, and relational capital on alliance performance, Knowledge and Process Management, 14(1), 58-69. Leonard, D., & Swap, W. (2004). Deep smarts, Harvard Business Review. Boston 82(9), 88–98. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development, Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 32-48. Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2002). The adoption of agency businesss activety, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 23: 469–490 Liebeskind, J. P. (1996). Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(winter special issue), 93-107. Lin, Y.Y., & Edvinsson, L. (2008). National intellectual capital: Comparison of the Nordic countries, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 525-545. Lin, Y. Y., & Whetten, D. (2008). Culture and intellectual capital alignment predicts performance: Insights from national models, Paper presented at AIB 2008 conference in Milan, Italy. Lin, Y. Y. (1998). Success factors of small- and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan: An analysis of cases, Journal of Small Business Management, 36(4), 43-56.. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 102.

(110) Lins, K. V., & Servaes, H. (2002). Is corporate diversification beneficial in emerging markets, Financial Management, 31(Summer), 5-31. Livari, J., & Huisman, M. (2007). The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of systems development methodologies, MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 35-58. López, S. P., Peon, J. M. M., & Ordas, C. J. V. (2004). Organizational learnign as a determining factor in business performance, The learning Organization, 12(3), 227-245. Lund, D. B. (2003). Organizational culture and job satisfyion, The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(2/3), 219-236. Madsen, P. M., & Desai, V. (2010). Failing to learn? The effects of failure and successs on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle Industry, Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 451-476. Matusik, S. F., & Heeley, M. B. (2005). Absorptive capacity in the software Industry: Identifying dimensions that affect knowledge and knowledge createon activeties, Journal of Management, 31(4), 549-572. Marr, B., Gray, D., & Neely, A. (2003). Why do firms measure their intellectual capital? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 441-464. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organizational Science, 2(1), 71-87. Martin, B. (2000). Knowledge management within the context of management: An evolving relationship, Singapore Management Review, 22(2), 17-36. Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19, 487-505. Mavridis, D. G. (2004). The intellectual capital performance of the Japanese banking sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 92-115. Mayo, A. (2000). The role of employee development in the growth of intellectual capital, Personnel Review, 29(4), 1-9. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects, Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376-390. McDermott, C. M., & Stock, G. N. (1999). Organizational culture and advanced manufacturing technology implementation, Journal of Operations Management, 17, 521-533. McElroy, M. W. (2002). Social innovation capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(1), 30-39. Miller, D. J., Fern, M. J., & Cardinal, L. (2007). The use of knowledge for technological innovateon within diversified firms, Academy of Management. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 103.

組織文化、智慧資本與組織績效之關係： 知識運用能力的干擾效果 - 政大學術集成

組織文化、智慧資本與組織績效之關係：知識運用能力的干擾效果 - 政大學術集成