[email protected]
(paradigm) ! " #$ -%-&'( $) * + , - ./ 0 1 23 * 45 6 - ./ 0 7 1 28 9 : ; < = > ? @ A #( B - .'C#D E F G'C#H / .'C#I &J , ' KL M > ? N O @ P Q R S T UV M = > ? W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` Q R S L #- .'ab cQ R S L d e #fg ' h i b cfg ) * L j k l m n &o 8 9 ! p q r st1)- ./ 0 3 * u ) vw x y z { | KL } ~ U + , 2)- ./ 0 &o3 * H #$ -%-&'H " T H 3) 1 2D E 7 7 4) i 1 2 T % 4¡ q tC- ./ 0 C$%&Abstract
In present day, as we can see the explosive growth of web-based learning. It is very important about how to design a high quality e-learning paradigm. In this study, we present a problem-solving instructional e-learning system, based on “Understanding-Doing-Thinking” cognitive process. To provide students with four stages, included to recognize problem, design method, solve problem, reflect on evaluation. Each stage has three tasks. Students follow the tasks and finish all the learning activities through the thinking level. The findings indicate this system could help students practice problem-solving more effectively via the “Understanding-Doing-Thinking” cognitive process. Results show: Using web-based learning system has its contribution to the instructional methodology. Moreover, this system also collected students’ learning behaviors which can help to analyze the system itself and students’ learning effect.
Keywords: web-based learning, problem solving,
Understanding-Doing-Thinking.
1.
1.1
= ¢ £ ¤ ¥C¦ § ¥¨ © ª « $¬ 4 ® ¯ ° ± ² ³ : ; ´ µ < = ¨ © t1)¶ · ¸ ¢ a ¹ º2) » ¸ ¢ a¹ ¼ ½ ¾¿ º 3) À Á 4  ) * º4) Ã Ä ÅÆ Ç È É ¥Ê " Ë ª ÌÍ Î Ï Ð" < Ñ G Ò Ó Ô Q Õ 7 Ö × Ø T Ù ) 4Ô Ú Û Ã Ä 4Ü Ý Þ ß à á â Ý È ã ä å aæ ç è é ê ë " U% ì í î U ï U ð ñ $¬ ò ó Cê ô Cõ ö 4÷ ø ù úû Åü Ò ] # Ö × ý ê þ µ / 0 F G h " Æ $ ¬ 4 ¡ ' Rosenberg 2001 Þ ê · ö ó  f Ê " ¶ U Æ ä . (Krajcik, Czerniak & Berger, 1999)a² . (Chan, Hue, Chou, & Tzeng, 2001;Liu, 2004ºLiu, Chen, & Chen, 2001) = F Ê " c# ') * ì ¢ K ¥t1) 3 * ) à 2) ¥$¬ 3)" ² 4)4 H p 5)) * 4 p q ì 8 9 ! " # KL 5 6 4$ ý Þ 4% & " ½ Ê " ' ý ( ) *
1.2
® à +L Þ O , - . $¬ ú ³ $/ 01 $¬ ì 1 " @ 2C3 4Ï Ð Kã 5 6 7 Ä Isaksen & Parnes
1985#- ./ 0 'ã 89 KÖ × C ® : ; £ U< = r > ? ³ ½ 7 @ A B ¯ ã 8 úC ¾ ® D E 6 F Ô Ú D * C × G ã 8H î I J C8 K í L M ¥ 7 @ ^ N 5 î O P Ã Ä q 7 @ ã Q 7 @ Z R S " #T 5 -./ 0 ' " Æ Ç 7 Ä 4U cã 8 r Y ³ V W (Coste, 1996) ~ 4ê ô Ö × X 4 j L x f4- ./ 0 Y L ø Z 4H S $ (Ansburg, 2003)¾ T 3 * + , Amabile(1988)] [ \ = > ? t1)w x R S (Task presentation) 2) ) * (Preparation) 3) ] Ì^ (Idea generation) 4) _
` Ì ^ (Idea Validation) 5) c q a b(Outcome assessment) West(1990)S Æ [ < > ? \ Ã t 1) _( (recognition) 2) c 9 (initiation) 3) H d (implementation) 4) e ` (stabilization) Isaksen, Dorval, & Treffinger(2000)#Creative Approaches to Problem Solving'f fL I g h ! oi 7 D E R S ¥ CPS` 6 < = ² ³ > ? t ( B - .(Identification) D E F G(Design) H / .(Solve problem) I &J , (Reflection) " < = > ? KH ½ j k W D ( $ (Mata-Cognitive)3 * l tZimmermanÅm 5 Í n o (self-regulated learning)] = R p 5 A B E q r Í n À Á &^ C7 s 4%9 \ Ã o ) * " 4 = %´ Í n t u (self-monitoring) (2000) v ä . ÅZ ³
1.3
-
-
!
!
!
!
"
"
"
"
#
#
#
#
$
$
$
$
%
&
%
%
&
&
%
&
w ® Ö × x V L y 7 z X 4 # KH { " | } / Ö × | ~a ² Z ³ v 9 x V 7 ICT j +(substitution) 5 T 6 (innovation)U ú ] H (transformation) (Van der Klink & Jochems, 2004)¯ ® x V 7 D E ill-structured knowledge 4 f = ² . U%7 D E KÀ Á 3 * = = - ./ 0 R S ® x V 7 D E : ; %m C ¢ f) * (explicit behavioral operation)4 è m C &o3 * (implicit mental process)ø ^ = H ® x V 7 D E [ » ) * ( G4^ G - ./ 0 ã 8² ³ { ³ Ù ) #( L ' (learning-by-doing)" 4#%L &'(reflection-in-action) ) * ý U ì c 4 U# ~ I J Õ ® Æ Ç I ~È É ¥ à C cT 5 #$úÞ %'C #%úÞ &'a#Þ $ú%' & ã L x V Schon(1983)ÅÆ [ &¥H — % 9 L $(knowing-in-action)C % 9 L & (reflection-in-action) C % 9 W & (reflection-on-action) Ê p 5 #$-%-&' x Ä ¾ 3 * #$-%-&'5 KH Â Í _ (feedback)± Z I ! Ê K ¡ ï U T ¾ Í Î ¡ ¢ ac= £ l î K ¤ ¥ 4¦ § ~ ú î ¨ ¡ q Åü Í n a b(self-evaluation)½ ¶ © ª 7 @ ! H ¡ ¯ Z = ¢ * #$-%-&' x = « ã î 1 ¬ R 6 R H ® à + 7 @ « ® 7 ç " U CÆ T #$-%-&' x A B ¯ 8 Ê p c A B 7 ° ± T Ö × N ² L ³ k ´ ß $¬ ? î ã ¢ * µ « T &o4Í n I &ã 8 " / 0 ¶ Ä ! " ® x V 7 D E R S Ù ) 1 2Û 4· L H ú¢ 5 6 R S U ¢ * $%& - ./ 0 ã 8
2.
¯ " ¸ ¹ ! º ª « #$»%»&' f7 D E À Á 4 " ä . ² ¼ Ù ) ½ ^ b c ® x V 7 D E R S ¢ ! A ´ t Õ - ./ 0 #$»%»&' 3 * @ 2¾ Õ - ./ 0 #$»%»&' c¡ @ 2¾ ¾3.
!
!
!
!
¾3.1 ' ( ) * + ,
'
'
'
(
(
(
)
)
)
*
*
*
+
+
+
,
,
,
¾Input Process Output
$»%»&' ft¾ Ö × À Á 7 @ ø © 7 D E 3 * @ 2 c¡ @ 2! ! ¿ . À @ 2 Á 4Â Ã ¢ D E F C n Ä Ù ) Å m 4¾ 8 9 @ 2 } / 3 * L Þ > ? R S Æx 7 Â F C n Ä D E Q #$» %»&' a b] B Ç " U%o È 4 E @ 2
3.2 - . /
-
-
-
.
.
.
/
/
/
! 1 2x $%&- ./ 0 À Á [ # ² . + É ' Ê http://raps.mleps.hlc.edu.tw/ Æ Ç T Ë Ì ® 7 @ Í * 62 ~ Î Ï cÐ Ñ Ò T Ó V 1 2U%à Ð Í 9 -Ô T U£ CÕ u ® Ö À ² .+ É 8 9 " $%&P > ? ) * : ; - ./ 0 < = > ? ×1 @ A t #( B - .'t: Ø - .Ñ CP Ù & oCk / - .P = Q R S ¾ ÅC ¾- . _( ¬ #D E F G't: Ø Ú Û À Ca Ü F GC0 ` F P = Q R S Ý 5 _/ .F #H / .'t: Ø ø À Cb cF CÞ ß H %P = Q R S ª « / .F G ½ ì U%H #I &J , 't: Ø à %p q C á @ 2C' ý À Á P = Q R S Ù ) p q &/ .3 * 4cq T UV M = > ? R S W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` Q R S L #- .'ab cQ R S L d e #fg ' h i ) * L j k l m n # C@ 2C3 Ca b'8 9 ×2â ×4 v fq C sl b cfg ) * ã ³ R ä f M n fg ö å ã À æ L 6 ç è - Ô ~ T M n ç 1 aÌ ã Ê ¾£ é 4& o) * È cÊ #_ ê '3 * ! T ã j L @ 2T #$-%-&'3 * ë ? M = R S X ä ì , Z í Ê 4 î 9 K L À û ï _ ð n 4ñ X ò ó T L a $ Ð ô H - Ô M n Ó V W 3 * ì fg õ WÍ 9 a ö ÷e _ ×1 #$»%»&'> ? 4R S×2 #$'q C t> ? R S 1-3#k / - .'
×3 #%'q C t> ? R S 2-2#a Ü F G'
3.3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 # $
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
#
#
#
$
$
$
® Ö × x V L y 7 w ø z X 4 # KH { " | } / Ö × | ~a ² Z ³ v 9 v F GÊ " ç 1 7 À Á Ê % ¥ : Ø t1) ô ù ú 4û ü 2) " T 6 Project ^ À Á 3) Ö × # Þ ý V Ö × &(Inglis, Ling, & Joosten, 1999; Fisser, 2001)! " ® x V 7 D E project é Ù ) 1 2Û 4· L H ú¢ 5 6 R S H ã 8 (competency-based learning) (Merrill, 2002) ¯ ® x V 7 D E ill-structured knowledge 4 f = ² . U% 7 D E 3 * L T &o: Ø k %m C ¢ f) * (explicit behavioral operation)4 è m C &o3 * (implicit mental process)£ T þ f - ./ 0 (Problem-solving) v 4) * ú WT S $%&&o ! Ò " b cx V 7 D E R S Ø fT b c/ . > ? 4 R S D E Æ1Åst Æ1 > ? ² .4Z ³ b cR S > ? ² . Z ³ b cR S ö > ? ( B - . 1-1- .Ñ tÍ Î a^ G# ® x V 7 '´ = ` 6 1-2P Ù &otb c´ µ - . k I | à ) v ) * L 5 - . F GÊ " 0 ® x V 7 D E 5 v ~ « ã 7 L À K ¡ q = > ? x g h v ï å @ l tÚ / -- Û ! × " N ² 1-3k / - .tP Ù W ¾ ® x V 7 ¨ © # î 1 ¢ _ aT Í Î µ 5 $ / ?% Í Î # & @ ã 8Ê " µ « D E ® x V 7 7 ' ù &o¾( N ² ) * ^ ^ x > ? ^ ( ² . + a Ü " W , ´ ! 9 Ü ö - > ? D E F G 2-1Ú Û À t. © ª / F Ô K0 ø C1 Cý  ì a Ü K¬ ¥ 2-2a Ü F Gt[ Ç Â · L ¥C× G Ê %¥C7 Ê %¥C¡ 2 Ê %¥C Ê %¥\ ] B a Ü Í Î ÅÌ&² . ì a  KÊ % ¥ 2-30 ` F t[ Ç V ` N ² CD E ² .C¬ 3 4 C7 5 à C D E ø © 0 ` Í Î ³ D E ² . ö P > ? H / . 3-1 ø À t ø © ª / F Ô K0 ø C1 Cý  3-2b cF t ÅV W / 6 , ® x V 7 7 8 9 D E 3-3Þ ß H %t 7 8 7 à 7 9 * ö < > ? I &J , 4-1à %p q tb c´ µ - . Í a : ù » 8 7 ) * L : 5 ¶ ; ï K/ 0 F ì Æ [ ¢ ª ¿ a : î ÷e _ 5 $ 4ª ¿ ø F Ô 4-2 á @ 2t3 Í Î 4 å 5 $ , ´ Í Î ÅD E ® x V 7 7 8 9 D E | 4á | 4-3' ý Á ± tb c´ µ - . Ì Í Î 7 8 9 D E Kî < b = ? q ´ n O D E © ² .> Ð 1 V a? ( Ë 7 8 9 D E ' ý Á ± ?
4.
"
"
"
"
#
#
#
#
$
$
$
$
%
%
%
%
4.1 ! " 4
!
!
!
"
"
"
4
4
4
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
:
:
:
:
4.1.1 Æ2< n U£ J @ - ./ 0 < > ? u ) v Ê " [ ý u ª i = > ? UV ´ = > ? 7 A à À # = Kç 1 vúû B z n y z ö C 5 ö - C 1 D ç 1 v36% ö - C 5 ö P C 1 D ç 1 v23% ö P C 5 ö < C 1 D ç 1 v5% ì í E W? ç 1 vE F Ê ã } ~ : Ø G % H Æx ¦ I I ~ Wz z | J aR S ¼ E 5 WC E ; Ê " Ù ) T Å m U R Æ2 J @ UK u ª v J @ u ª ö C ö - C ö P C ö < C > ? (( B - .) 31% 67% 36% 87% 20% 95% 8% > ? -(D E F G) - 41% 67% 26% 72% 5% > ? P (H / .) - - 62% 64% 2% > ? < (I &J , ) - - - 40% 4.1.2 ² ³ [ Å m é C- L M , N F C À i Ï ÐW &o3 * ( ø Æ 3 Å s Æ3 $%&/ . 4ù O ( ¬ - . ² .V W C ® x V 7 ¯ ° ¨ © ª « 4 P ³ , ³ #$'> ? I v & &o- . 4 ¾#%'> ? Å2 Uúò ó 5 #&'> ? ~ #$'m C $ Q * $¬ ³ ¥ Q * $¬ Ë T / 0 8 9 ³ ~ T Ð [ Ç KR . / CV ` 7 é S KR 7 + I D E ý Â D E 7 F T ÷ 7 D E F Ð ~ ~úU # = Ï ÐÊ " [ T ¾ V D E w W # X I fGQ _` Y Ì O Z & é % 47 T 9 ã [ \ 7 T 4 ^ #$-%-&'P > ? [ Þ Ê z b cfg 7 D E ñ Ð Æx î _ 4, Z T ~ ¾ ® x V 7 ¨ © ' \ @ ] Å" Ò fg b c W 7 T _ a î ª ¿ È KÌ ² ³ [ Ç _ E ¢ Kfg ñ E & J · 4&o T ¾#&'> ? ^ ¾ Í Î fñ ã U Í n I & ¾ ~fñ ã Æ [ = ~$ / ÷ e _ £ _ úû T # %&úW $' , ` Í Î %9 a É 4 I & ú $¬ b S Z ³ cP a É à ì í ' d I & p q U Õ c$¬ ½ Þ ¶ - e " Ç ý º T # $&úW %' , f ¿ $¬ I & ú H S L " %9 ý H S I &Å $¬ Þ 4H g ºú T # $%úW &' , [ h A ~ ÅÆ Ç $¬ 4Í Î %9 ú i ¾ j k r I &ª Ì 5 6 $¬ S c l c4.2
4.2.1 !" # $ % & ' ( ) * + !, - . / 0 1 2 3 4 ) 5 6 ! 7 8 1 2 9 : ; < != > ? @ A B CDEFG H I J !. / ) K L M N 2O P Q R !S T U V = W X Y Z ! 2[ \ ] ^ _ !` ` a b c d e f ) !g h i j k l m n !ol p q r s t u !I ) v w x y g ` z { 9 : | } !X u I ~ ! K L ol != ! B 2\ 4.2.2 ) ! ! W \ ] ^ _ !I ! ) ¡ !¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ § ¨ : © ª ) « ¬ * B !® ¯ ° ± W ² ³ ´ X µ F ¶ · 2¸ F !¹ º » ¼ ½ ) $ !I ¾ W ¿ ) T À ~ Á Â Ã
5.
n Ä Å ¸ Æ Ç È E x y v w ol É Ê ] Ë ! Ä Å Ì) V Í 0 0 Î ) Ï Ð Ñ Ò1) v w x y É Ê ) Ó Ô Õ Ö × Ø ) Ù Ú !Û Ü ) Ý Þ ß A à Æ Ç ! ® á â ã Ö ä å æ ç å æ è é ê ë ¨ : !0 ê ì Ó ' ) í î 2)v w x y ) > ol É Ê å æ ï ð ñò--oó) ð ô !0 õ ö ÷ ø ð ù ) ú 6 3) á à û ü ) ý þ !n / å N ß A £ B 7 ) * Eõ 4) 5 X ) ç 2!á F ) Ê Ü ) V Í ! : / ) Ë Ì!å æ 7 û M i B 7 )[1]Amabile, T. M. (1988), “ A model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations”, Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 10, pp.123-167. [2]Ansburg, P. I. and Hill, K. (2003).” Creative and
Analytic Thinkers Differ in Their Use of Attentional Resources” , Personality and Individual Difference, Vol.34, pp. 1141-1152. [3]CCL (Center for Creative Learning), available
at:http://www.creativelearning.com/
[4]Coste, T.G. (1996), “ Group Creativity: Divergence and Convergence in Technological Design”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan, Michigan Technological University.
[5]Isaksen, S. G. (2004). Toward a Model for the Facilitation of Creative Problem Solving, Journal of Creative Behavior, 17(1),18-31. [6]Isaksen, Scott G., Dorval, K. Brian, Treffinger and
Donald J. (2000), “ Creative Approaches to Problem Solving: A Framework for Change (2nd. Ed.)”, Williamsville, NY: Creative Problem Solving Group- Buffalo.
[7]Krajcik, J.S., Czerniak, C.M., & Berger,C., (1999). Teaching Children Science: Project-based Approach., Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill. [8]Liu, M. C.(2001), “ User Centered Requirements: A
Systematic Web Course Developing Process.” Educational Technology, Vol. 41, No.6,pp. 15-22.
[9]Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner :How Professionals Think In Action, New York :Basic Books.
[10]Selby, E. C., Treffinger, D. G., Isaksen, S. G. & Lauer, K. J. (2004). Defining and Assessing
Problem-Solving Style: Design and
Development of a New Tool, Journal of Creative Behavior, 17(1), 221-243.
[11]Treffinger, D. J. & Selby, E. C.(2004). Problem-Solving Style: A New Approach to Understanding and Using Individual Differences, Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 14(1), 5-10.
[12]Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Practice Problems for Creative Problem Solving, 3rd Edition.
[13]West, M. (1990), “ Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies”, The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. West & J. Farr(Eds.), pp. 309-334. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons.
[14]Zimmerman, B. J. (2000), ” Attaining
Self-Regulated : A Social Cognitive Perspective” , In M. Boekaerts & P. R.
Pintrich(Eds.) ,Handbook of Self-regulated Learning, pp.13-39. San Diego, CA: Academic Press