• 沒有找到結果。

The Change and Implementing Learning Organization -Case of Tax Office in Taiwan 鄭秋煌、羅世輝,陳欽雨

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The Change and Implementing Learning Organization -Case of Tax Office in Taiwan 鄭秋煌、羅世輝,陳欽雨"

Copied!
2
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

The Change and Implementing Learning Organization -Case of Tax Office in Taiwan 鄭秋煌、羅世輝,陳欽雨

E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

A learning organization emphasizes the capabilities of flexibility, self-examination, innovation, and adaptation. The Tax Office which is one of the administrative governmental organizations gradually encounters the pressure from the change of time and the service needs of people. Since some of the current organizations are bureaucratic and constrained by laws and regulations, it is worthy studying on such an important, constructive, and meaningful issue that how to successfully transform the rigid organization into the learning one. It can conform with the environmental conditions and people's needs. To ensure the correctness and comprehensiveness of the study, the present study was based on the results obtained from literature review, and then conducted an in- depth interview for supporting the previous findings. The results indicate that there is a possibility to implement a learning organization on the Tax Office if the learning barriers and defensive behaviors can be overcome. The results also showed that four dimensions including fundamental concepts, approach introduction, operation mechanisms, and implementation procedures might be required if someone would like to restructure the Tax Office to become a learning organization. The fundamental concepts are extracted from the main ideas established by Senge (1990, 1994). The approach introduction includes five disciplines, i.e., personal mastery, mental models, team learning, shared vision, and systems thinking. The four operation mechanisms are leadership strengthening, organizational strategy, organizational culture, and organizational structure. The last dimension, implementation procedures, covers the following six steps: (1) to form common perceptions and leader's commitments; (2) to build an effective learning team; (3) to develop an integrated learning strategy; (4) to shape organization culture with continuous learning and improvement; (5) to construct an appropriate organization structure for learning; and (6) to develop a learning system of knowledge network. Once the four dimension described above are integrated, it is expected that the basic framework of implementing a learning organization for the Tax Office can be developed.

Keywords : learning organization, organization change

Table of Contents

封面內頁 簽名頁 國科會授權書 iii 中文摘要 iv 英文摘要 v 誌謝 vii 目錄 viii 圖目錄 xi 表目錄 xii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背 景與動機 1 一、研究背景 1 二、研究動機 2 第二節 研究目的與方法 3 一、研究目的 3 二、研究方法 4 第三節 研究範圍與 架構 5 一、研究範圍及對象 5 二、研究架構 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 學習型組織興起與發展之相關研究 7 一、學習型 組織的發展背景與理論基礎 7 二、學習型組織的基本內涵 9 三、學習型組織的發展概況 15 第二節 組織變革與再造之相關 研究 17 一、組織變革的意義與內涵 17 二、組織變革的障礙因素與克服 21 三、組織變革的管理和評估 26 第三節 學習型組 織建構之相關研究 29 一、建構學習型組織的障礙因素 29 二、建構學習型組織的導入模式 33 三、建構學習型組織的發展 策略與步驟 37 第四節 行政機關再造成為學習型組織之相關研究 41 一、行政機關組織再造的意涵 41 二、學習型組織與行 政機關組織特質的差異 42 三、行政機關再造成為學習型組織的策略 46 第三章 稅捐稽徵處再造與導入學習型組織之可行性 探討 51 第一節 稅捐稽徵處的現況與發展簡介 51 一、組織沿革與架構 51 二、組織功能與發展 52 第二節 稅捐稽徵處面臨 的問題與分析 55 第三節、稅捐稽徵處的契機與可能遭遇的障礙分析 57 第四節、稅捐稽徵處的障礙克服與效益評估 60 第 四章 稅捐稽徵處導入學習型組織之架構雛型探討 64 第一節、建構稅捐稽徵處學習型組織的基本概念 64 第二節、建構稅捐 稽徵處學習型組織的導入方法 68 第三節、建構稅捐稽徵處學習型組織的運用機制 75 第四節、建構稅捐稽徵處學習型組織 的行動步驟 81 第五節、稅捐稽徵處學習型組織之架構雛型分析與驗證 85 第五章 結論與建議 88 第一節、研究發現 88 第二 節、後續研究方向建議 90 第三節、研究限制 91

REFERENCES

中文部分 1.王思峰、楊仁壽,2002,三種組織學習的類型與其介入模式,收錄於雲林科技大學商 管科技季刊,3:4,頁249-274。 2.朱楠 賢,2000,形塑行政機關為學習型組織之困境與對策,人事月刊,30:1,頁6-25。 3.朱楠賢,2001,學習型組織:願景或幻影,人事月刊

,32:6,頁33-38。 4.余建業,2001,由軍隊創新論國軍變革,國立國防大學管理學院決策科學研究所碩士論文。 5.李再長譯,1999,組 織理論與管理,台北:華泰文化。 6.李芳齡譯,2001,變革之舞(下),台北:天下文化。 7.李純誼,2001,企業建構學習型組織之導入 模式探討,國立雲林科技大學企業管研究所 碩士論文。 8.李雅慧,1999,全面品質管理與學習型組織,收錄於中華民國成人教育學會

(2)

主編:學習 型組織,台北,師大書苑。 9.邱如美譯,2002,領導人的變革法則,台北:天下遠見。 10.吳清山,1997,學習型組織理論與 其對教育革新的啟示,國教月刊,14:5-6,頁1-7。 11.吳定,1991,公共行政論叢,台北:天一圖書。 12.吳定,1996,組織發展與技術,

台北,天一圖書。 13.吳定,1998,公共政策辭典,台北:五南圖書。 14.吳秉恩,1986,組織行為學,台北:華泰書局。 15.周大衛、林益 昌、施純協,2001,企業勝典,台北:知行文化。 16.周旭華譯,2000 ,變革,哈佛商業評論,台北:天下文化。 17.周芸薇,2000,學習型 組織評鑑量表之建立,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 18.林水波,1999,組織理論,台北:智勝文化。 19.林志成,1998

,學習型組織之概念分析、基本假定暨實踐策略,國立台灣體育學 報,3(上),頁69-96。 20.林淑品,2000,公務機關發成為學習型

組織之可行性研究 以勞工保險局為例,國立台 灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。 21.孫本初,2001,公共管理,台北:智勝文化。

22.袁方主編,2002,社會研究方法,台北:五南書局。 23.教育部編印,1998,邁向學習社會:推展終身教育、建立學習社會,台北:教育 部。 24.許士軍,1995,管理學,台北:東華書局。 25.許士軍,2002,駛向「組織學習」汪洋大海的南針,收錄於柯雅琪譯組織學習導 讀,台 北:天下文化。 26.郭進隆譯,1994,第五項修練,台北:天下文化。 27.陳晉業,2003,論公務領導應有的特質,92:9,頁11-13。

28.陳菁雯,1997 ,學習型組織對提昇公部門能力之研究,私立中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 29.陳建宏,1995,組織學習理論 應用於行政革新之研究,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。 30.陳毓璟2001,透過全面品質管理與學習型組織來提升公共部門的 行政改革成效,研考雙 月刊,25::5,頁98~108 31.張莞珍,1999,建立以學習型組織為運作基礎的學習型社區種籽人才培訓模式,收錄 於學 習型社區與終身教育研討會,台北:台灣師大。 32.黃營杉譯,1999,策略管理,台北:華泰文化。 33.中國租稅研究會編著,2003,

中華民國租稅制度與法規,台北:中國租稅研究會。 34.黃富順,1999,學習型組織緣起、意義、特性與實施,收錄於中華民國成人教育 學會主編:學 習型組織,台北:師大師苑。 35.楊國德,1999,學習型組織的理論與應用,台北:師大書苑。 36.楊碩英,1994,再造組織的 無限生機,收錄於郭進隆譯第五項修練導讀,台北:天下文化。 37.路蓮婷,2002,公務人員對組織變革應有之認識,研習論壇月刊,14

,頁33-39。 38.齊若蘭譯,1995,第五項修練Ⅱ實踐篇(上)(下),台北:天下文化。 39.蔡祈賢,2000,發展公務人力學習型組織的 策略,人力發展月刊,77,頁9-14。 40.蔣玉嬋,2001,學習型組織與組織文化之探討,社教雙月刊,102,頁26-36。 41.謝安田,1992

,企業管理,台北:五南圖書。 42.謝宗貴,1999,談稅捐稽徵處組織之變革,中國稅務旬刊,1736,頁20-23。 43.簡芳忠,2001,環境 變遷與組織變革之研究-以日本鐵道(JR)為例,私立大葉大學事業 經營研究所碩士論文。 44.魏惠娟,1998,學習型組織的迷思與省 思,成人教育,43,頁34-43。 45.魏惠娟,2002,建構學習型組織的概念架構及其在學校的實踐,收錄於雲林科技大學商 管科技季刊

,3:4,頁319-336。 46.羅世輝,2002,系統動力學-理論與方法簡介,私立大葉大學事業經營研究所講義。 英文部分 1.Appleby, P.(1992)."Government Is Different,"in Shafritz, J. M. & Hyde A. C. (e -ds), Classics of Public Administration, 3rd. ed., CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. 2.Argyris, C.(1993). Education for leading learning. Organizational Dynamics, Wi -nter,5-17. 3.Bennett J. K. & O'Brine M. J. (1994),"The Building Blocks of The Learning organ -ization", Training, 31(6), PP. 41-49. 4.Calvert, G.,Mobley, S.,Marshall, L.(1994)"Grasp The Learning Organization". Tra -ining and Development, 48(4), pp.38-43. 5.Daft, R.L.(1997). Organization theory and design. New York: West. 6.Dewey, J.(1938). Experience and education. N.Y.: Collier. 7.Eton Lawrence (1999). Some Thoughts on Turning a Govemmeut Organization into a Lea -rning Organization Canada: Public Service Commission. 8.Galbraith J.R. &Lawler E.E. (1993). Organizing for the Future: the New Logic for M -anaging Complex Organizations, C.A.: Jossey Bass. 9.Garvin, D.A.(1993). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, J -uly-august,78-91. 10.Hodge. B.,j., & Johnson. H.,J.(1970). Management and organization behavior. A m -ultidimensional approach. New York:

John Wiely & Sons,pp.432-433. 11.Huse, E.F."Organization Development and Change",2nd ed. St. Paul,Minn.: Wes -t,1980,pp.63. 12.Jerald Greenberg "Managing Behavior in Organization" 1999 Prentice Hall Inc. 13.Kerka, S.(1995). The learning organization:Myths and realities.

(ERIC Document R -eproduction Service No. ED388802) 14.Kovach, J.W.(1997), "Invest In Learning", Executive Excellence,14(2),pp.11.

15.Lewin, K.,"Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept,Method, and Reality in Social Sci -ence"Human Relations 1,1947, pp.5-41. 16.Longworth, N.(1999). Making lifelong learning work: Learning cities for a lear -ning century,London: Kogan Page. 17.Marquardt, M.J.(1996).Building the learning organization: A systems approach t -o quantum improverment and global success. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill. 18.Michael Hammer and James Champy,1993,Reengineering the oporation, Harper Colli -s Publishers,P.32. 19.Morgan, J.S."Managing Change,"McGraw-Hill Co.,New York (1972). 20.Morris, L.(1993). Learning organizations: settings for developing adults. In J. De -mick and P. Miller.(Eds.), Development in the work place. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawren -ce Earlbaun Associates,Inc. 21.Rainey F. G. (1991)"Understanding and Managing Public Organizations, San Fransi -sco": Jossey-Bass Publishers. 22.S.P. Robbins(1996), Organizational Behavior, New Jersey : Prentice Hall,Inc.,p -p.723-727. 23.Senge, P.M.(1990).

The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning or -ganization. N.Y.: Doubleday. 24.Senge, Peter M.(1994),"Learning to Alter Mental Models", Executive Excellenc -e,11(3),16-28. Senge, P. M., (et al. (ed.)(1999). The fifth discipline fieldb -ook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. N.Y.: The Spi -eler Agency. 25.Senge, P.M. (1994). Moving forward: Thinking strategically about building learni -ng organization about building learning organization. In P.M. Senge, C. Robert -s, R. B. Ross, B. J. Smith & A. Kleiner (Eds.), The fifth discipline fieldboo -k: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doub -leday Currency. 26.Senge, P. M., C. Roberts, R. B. Ross, B.

J. Smith & A. Kleiner(1994). The Fift -h Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organiza -tion. New York: Doubleday Currency. 27.Senge, P., C. Roberts, R. Ross, B. Smith, G. Roth & A. Kleiner(1999). The danc -e of change. New York: Doubleday Currency.

28.Senge, P. M., (et al. (ed.)(1999). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies an -d tools for building a learning organization. N.Y.: The Spieler Agency. 29. The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook(1999). Sources. URL: http://www.fieldbook.com/ 30. Watkins, K.E. and Marsick, V.J.(1993).

Sculption the learning organization. San F -rancisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

參考文獻

相關文件

• e-Learning Series: Effective Use of Multimodal Materials in Language Arts to Enhance the Learning and Teaching of English at the Junior Secondary Level. Language across

• e‐Learning Series: Effective Use of Multimodal Materials in Language Arts to Enhance the Learning and Teaching of English at the Junior Secondary Level. Language across

• Assessment Literacy Series: Effective Use of the Learning Progression Framework to Enhance English Language Learning, Teaching and Assessment in Writing at Primary Level. •

• Assessment Literacy Series - Effective Use of the Learning Progression Framework to Enhance English Language Learning, Teaching and Assessment in Writing at Primary Level.

 Promote project learning, mathematical modeling, and problem-based learning to strengthen the ability to integrate and apply knowledge and skills, and make. calculated

Now, nearly all of the current flows through wire S since it has a much lower resistance than the light bulb. The light bulb does not glow because the current flowing through it

stating clearly the important learning concepts to strengthen the coverage of knowledge, so as to build a solid knowledge base for students; reorganising and

Using this formalism we derive an exact differential equation for the partition function of two-dimensional gravity as a function of the string coupling constant that governs the