• 沒有找到結果。

The Study on The Influences of Learning Organizational And Personality on Willings of Sharing knowledge of the Expatriat 蔡繼智、賴文魁、劉家駒

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The Study on The Influences of Learning Organizational And Personality on Willings of Sharing knowledge of the Expatriat 蔡繼智、賴文魁、劉家駒"

Copied!
4
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

The Study on The Influences of Learning Organizational And Personality on Willings of Sharing knowledge of the Expatriat

蔡繼智、賴文魁、劉家駒

E-mail: 9403223@mail.dyu.edu.tw

ABSTRACT

This research is discuss about the influence of learning organization and personality on sharing knowledge of expatriate in China.

The independent variables are learning organization (personal level, team level, and organizational level) and personality (altruism, reciprocity). The dependent variable is sharing knowledge willing(share personal knowledge, share learning opportunity, promote learning motive ). This research takes the expatriates in China for example. Totally 620 questionnaires were sent and 208 copies of completed questionnaires were returned. After regression analyzed with the SPSS 10.0 statistical analysis program, the conclusion is as follows: 1. In a regression, learning organization has partly significant influence on sharing personal knowledge of expatriate in China; learning organization has partly significant influence on sharing learning opportunity of expatriate in China;learning organization has partly significant influence on promoting learning motive of expatriate in China. 2. In a regression, personality has significant influence on sharing personal knowledge of expatriate in China ; personality has significant influence on sharing learning opportunity of expatriate in China;personality has partly significant influence on promoting learning motive of expatriate in China. 3. In a regression , learning organization and personality has partly significant influence on sharing personal knowledge of expatriate in China;learning organization and personality has partly significant influence on sharing learning opportunity of expatriate in China; learning organization and personality has partly significant influence on promoting learning motive of expatriate in China.

Keywords : learning organization, personality, sharing knowledge willing Table of Contents

封面內頁 簽名頁 授權書 iii 中文摘要 v 英文摘要 vi 誌謝 viii 目錄 x 圖目錄 xi 表目錄 xiii 第一章 緒論 1.1 研究背景---1 1.2 研究動機---2 1.3 研究目的---4 1.4 研究範圍與限制---4 1.5 研究流程---5 第二章 文獻探討 2.1 學習型組織探討---7 2.2 個人特質探討---15 2.3 知識分享意願探討---17 第三章 研究方法 3.1 研究架 構---43 3.2 研究假設---44 3.3 變數操作性定義---45 3.4 問卷設計與衡量---46 3.5 樣本資料收 集---49 3.6 資料的分析方法---51 第四章 實證分析 4.1 基本資料---53 4.2 學習型組織對外派員工知識分 享意願之影響---59 4.3 個人特質(利他主義、互利主義)對外派員工知識分享意願之影響---65 4.4 學習型組織、

個人特質對外派員工知識分享意願之影響---70 第五章 結論與建議 5.1 結論---79 5.2 建議---84 5.3 後續 研究的建議---85 參考文獻 一、中文部分---86 二、英文部分---90 附錄---97 圖目錄 圖 1.1 研究 流程………6 圖 2.1 Marquardt提出系統性學習型組織模型………..……13 圖 2.2 知識管理重要元素架構圖………26 圖 2.3 知識的轉換模式………31 圖 2.4 知識工作者知識分享模式………39 圖 3.1 研究架構………

……44 表目錄 表 2.1 學習型組織的定義……….…..9 表 2.2 資料、資訊、知識、智慧…………

……….……20 表 2.3 組織知識與個人知識……….…29 表 2.4 知識分享行為分類………

……….……41 表 3.1 研究問卷設計……….…48 表 3.2 信度分析………

……….…50 表 4.1 受測者性別百分比統計表……….……53 表 4.2 受測者 年齡百分比統計表……….……54 表 4.3 受測者教育程度百分比統計表……….……55 表 4.4 員工婚姻百分比統計表……….…55 表 4.5 受測者工作年資百分比統計表……….

…56 表 4.6 受測者所屬部門或單位百分比統計表……….…57 表 4.7 受測者目前外派的職位百分比統計表…………

……….…58 表 4.8 學習型組織對分享個人知識的迴歸變異數分析…….……60 表 4.9 學習型組織對分享個人知識的迴歸分 析……….……60 表 4.10 學習型組織對分享學習機會的迴歸變異數分析………..…62 表 4.11 學習型組織對分享學習機 會的迴歸分析………..…62 表 4.12 學習型組織對促進學習動機的迴歸變異數分析………….64 表 4.13 學習型組織對 促進學習動機的迴歸分析………..……64 表 4.14 個人特質對分享個人知識的迴歸變異數分析…….………66 表 4.15 個 人特質對分享個人知識的迴歸分析………..……66 表 4.16 個人特質對分享學習機會的迴歸變異數分析…….………67 表 4.17 個人特質對分享學習機會的迴歸分析………….…………68 表 4.18 個人特質對促進學習動機的迴歸變異數分析…

…..……69 表 4.19 個人特質對促進學習動機的迴歸分析………..…………69 表 4.20 學習型組織、個人特質對分享個人知識

(2)

的迴歸變異數分析……….………71 表 4.21 學習型組織、個人特質對分享個人知 識的迴歸分析……….…………71 表 4.22 學習型組織、個人特質對分享學習機會的 迴歸變異數分析………..………73 表 4.23 學習型組織、個人特質對分享學習機會 的迴歸分析……….………73 表 4.24 學習型組織、個人特質對促進學習動機的迴 歸變異數分析……….………75 表 4.25 學習型組織、個人特質對促進學習動機的 迴歸分析……….………75 表 4.26 假設驗證總彙整表…………..………

………76 REFERENCES

中文部分 1. 丁虹,1987,「企業文化與組織承諾之關係研究」,國立政治大 學企業管理研究所博士論文。 2. 王美音,楊子江合譯

(1997),Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. 著。The Knowledge-Creating Company。創新求勝-智價企業論。遠流出 版社出版。 3. 王文彥,

民90,知識分享內外在動機與知識分享行為之研究-- 以A 公司為例。 4. 尤克強(2001),知識管理與創新,天下遠見。 5. 伍忠賢

(2001),知識管理-策略與實務,華泰。 6. 汪金城(民90),研發機構分享機制之研究---以工研院光電所研 發團隊為例,政治大學公 共行政研究所。 7. 吳有順(民89),「網路社群知識分享過程之研究-以企業管理教學 網站為例」,碩士論文,政治大學企業管理研究所

。 8. 吳秉恩(1999),分享式人力資源管理-理念、程序與實務,翰蘆 圖書出版,台北。 9. 李有智(1999),「知識管理、產品創新與 影響兩者關係的干擾 變數之研究」,碩士論文,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所。 10. 李漢雄 (2000),人力資源策略管理,楊智文化

,台北,第100-135頁。 11. 林益昌 (1999),「建構企業學習型組織之研究」,國立台灣師範 大學工業教育研究所博士論文。 12. 林鈺欽 ( 1997),「個人創越、組織氛圍與學習型組織關係之研 究」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 13. 林皇興(1999

)。企業的數位神經網路(四)--知識管理。 14. 林彩梅(1992)。多國籍企業論。五南圖書出版社。 15. 洪榮昭 ( 2001 ),知識創新與 學習型組織,臺北:五南。 16. 洪振順 ( 1998 ),「組織公正對組織公民行為影響之研究-信任關 係之觀點」,碩士論文,國立中山大學人 力資源管理研究所,. 17. 胡瑋珊譯(1999),Thomas H. Davenport & Laurence Prusak 著。 Working Knowledge,知識管理。中國生產力 中心。 18. 郭進隆譯,Peter, M. Senge 著 ( 1994 ),第五項修練-學習型組 織的藝術與實務,臺北:天下文化。 19. 夏侯欣鵬(1990),權 力與信任對組織內部知識分享意願影響之 研究---以銀行放款部門主管為例,政治大學企業管理研究所。 20. 陳志昌(1998),「創新知 識管理策略之研究-以台灣高科技產業 為例」,碩士論文,國立中央大學企業管理研究所,。 21. 黃同圳(1995)。大陸台商人力資源 管理。風和出版社。 22. 張淑萍(2000)。知識管理與資訊科技應用相關性之研究。國立 台灣科技大學管理研究所企業管理學程。 23.

張玉文譯,杜拉克等著(民89),知識管理-哈佛商業評論,台 北:天下文化。馬曉雲(2001),新經濟的運籌管理-知識管理, 中國生 產力中心。 24. 湯令儀(2000),「知識分享網路之研究」,碩士論文,國立政治 大學企業管理研究所。 25. 楊君琦(民89 年)。技術 移轉互動模式失靈及重塑之研究-以 研究機構與中小企業技術合作為例。台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。 26. 管長青 ( 2001 ),「影響 學習型組織形成之相關因素研究-以工程 顧問業為例」,台科大管理研究所碩士論文。 27. 管康彥 (1997),「跨世紀企業管理新趨勢

」,能力雜誌,第118-121 頁。 28. 鄭伯壎、郭建志、任金剛 ( 2001 ),組織文化-員工層次的分析,臺北:遠流。 29. 廖肇弘(2000),「

善用知識管理系統-創企業智慧」,管理雜誌, 第310 期,第38-54 頁。 30. 黎士群(民88),組織信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究,

銘 傳大學管理科學研究所。 31. 劉京偉譯(2000),Arthur Andersen Business Consulting.勤業管 理顧問公司著。知識管理的第一本書。

商周出版。 32. 盧偉斯 ( 1996 ),「組織學習的理論性探究」,國立政治大學公 共行政研究所博士論文。 33. 謝榮禧 ( 1990 ),「策略性人 力資源管理及組織文化與知識管理 之關係-以趨勢科技產品開發程序為例」,碩士論文,雲林科技大 學企業管理研究所。 34. 羅瑞玉 ( 1996 ),國小學生的利社會行為及其相關因素之研究。 35. 比爾˙蓋茲(Bill Gates)(1999)。數位神經系統(樂為良譯)。 台北市:商 業周刊。 36. 洪明洲(2000),「軟體與知識管理」,電腦世界,頁55-59。 37. 周文祥、慕心譯(1998),Drucker.P.F.著,巨變時代的 管理,中天出版。 38. 楊國樞等人,社會及行為科學研究方法,東華書局,台北市,1989 年。 39. 齊若蘭譯(Jim Collins 著)(2002),從A 到A+。台北:遠流。 40. 夏侯欣鵬(2000)。信任與權力對組織內知識分享意願影響之研 究。國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。 英文 部分 1. Adler (1989), P.S. "Technology strategy: A guide to the literatures. In R. S. Rosenbloom & R.A. Burgelman, (Ed.), Reasarch on

technological innovation, management and policy", Greenwich, Connectocut: Jai Press Inc, pp.25-151 2. Alderfer, C.P., (1969)“An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol.4,142-175. 3. Anderson J. C., (1988)

“Gerbing DW:Structural equation modeling in practice:A review and recommended two-step approach,” Psychological Bulletin Vol. 103.No.4 pp.1-23. 4. Argyris, C. & Schon, D.A., (1978), Organizational learning:A theory of Action Perspective, M.A.:Addison-Wesley. 5. Badaracco, J.,

(1991)The Knowledge Link:How Firms Compete Through strategic Alliancdw, Boston Mass:Harvard Business School. 6. Barber, B., The Logic and Limits of Trust, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 7. Bar-Tal. D. (1976). Prosocial Behavior: Theory and research. NY: John Wiley. 8. Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Shavit N. (1981). Motives for helping behavior: Kibbutz and City children in kindergarten and School.

Developmental Psychology, 17(6), 766-772. 9. Batson, C.D.(1991). The altruism question: toward a social psychological answer.Hillsdale,N.J.:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10. Batson, C. D., & Oleson, K. C. (1991) Current status of the empathy-altruism hypothesis IN Clark, M. S.

Prosocial behavior : Review of personality and social psychology 12, Sage Publications 11. Bencivenga, D.,(1995), Learning Organization Evolve in New Directions, HR Management,40(10),69-73。 12. Bennett, J.K. & O’Brine, M.J., (1994). The Building Blocks of The Learning Organization,Training,31(6),41-49. 13. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal(1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective On Learning Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.128-152. 14. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W.,& White, R.E.(1999),An organizational

(3)

learning framework:From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review.24(3),522-537. 15. Cyert,Richard M. and James G. March 1963 A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, Nj:Prentice-Hall. 16. Daft, R. L. (1997), Organization Theory & Design.,

South-Western College Publishing. 17. Davenport, T. H.,& Prusak,L.(1998),”Working Knowledge:How Organizations Manage What They Know,” Boston:Harvard Business School Press.胡瑋珊譯,知識管理,台北:中國生產力 中心,1999。 18. Detert, J. R., Schroeder.R.G.,&

Mauriel J.J (2000) , A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations, Academy of Management Review,25(4),850-863 19. Dierickx, I. & Cool, K., (1989) “Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage,” Management Science, Vol. 35.

No.122,pp. 1504-1513. 20. Drucker,P.F., (1993) , Post-Capitalist Society, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.El Sawy,O.A.Eriksson l.and Raven,A. (1997),“Understanding the Nature of Shared Knowledge Creation Spaces around Business Process : An international investigation,”

Camagie Bosch Institute,Working paper pp.98-11 21. Drucker,P.F.,(1994) “The age of social transformation,” Atlantic Monthly, November,pp.55-80. 22. Drucker,P.F., (1979)“Work and Worker:Success Stories,” Modern Office Procedures, Vol.24.No.4,p.12. 23.

Drucker, P.F., (1999) “Knowledge-worker productivity:The Biggest Challenge.” California Management Review, Vol.41,79-94. 24. Duncan ,R.& Andrew Weiss Evan, (1979) “Organizational learning:implications for organizational design, ” Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT:JAI Press, Vol. 1,pp.75-123. 25. Eisenberg, N(1982)Introduction. In The development of Prosocial Behavior, Academic press,1-21. 26. Garvin, D. A.(1993).Building a learning organization, Harvard Business Review.July-Aug,78-91. 27. Gilbert, M. &

Gordey-Hayes Martyn,(1996). Understanding The Process of Knowledge Transfer to achieve Successful Technological Innovation.

Technovation, 16(6), Jun, pp.301-312. 28. Guielford, J.P.,(1965),“Psychometric Method”,2nd ed, New York:McGraw-Hill. 29. Hansen, M.T., Norhrina, N. & Tierney, T.(1999). What’s the Strategy for Managing Knowledge?Harvard Business Review, March-April,

pp.106-116. 30. Harem, T., Vonkrogh,G., & Roos,J. (1996). “Knowledge-baseds strategic change. Managing knowledge-perspectives on cooperation and competition. Georg von Krogh & Johan Roos(ed.) ”: ASGE Publications,pp.124-145. 31. Harris, D. B., 1998. Creating a Knowledge Centric Information Technology Environment,( http://www.htcs.com/ckc.html). 32. Hendriks, P., (1999) “Why Share Knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for Knowledge Sharing, “Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.6,No.2,pp. 91-100. 33.

Herzberg, F., (1968)Work and The Nature of Man, London Granada Publishing. 34. Hill, G. H.,& Jones, G. R.(2001),Strategic

Management Theory: An integrated approach,(5th ed.)Houghton Mufflin Company. 35. Holtshouse, Dan, (1998) “Knowledge research issues, “California Management Review, Vol. 43. No.3, pp.277-280. 36. Hoffman, M.L.(1975),”Altruistic Behavior and the Parent-Child Relationship, ”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,Vol.31. 37. Hope, J. and Hope, Tony(1997), “ Competing in the third wave: the ten key management issues of the information age, “ Harvard Business School Press. 38. Jashapara, A.(1993),The Competitive Learning Organization:A Quest For Holy Grail, Management Review,31(6),41-49. 39. K. E. Watkins and V. J. Marsick (1993), “Sculpting the Learning Organization: Lessons in the Arts and Science of Systemic Change,” San Francisco California: Jossey- Bass Publisher 40. Kim, W. C., and R. A.

Mauborgne (1998). “Procedural Justice, Strategic Decision Making, and the Knowledge Economy.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.19, pp.323-328. 41. Kochon, T. & Useem, M. (1992), Transforming Organization, New York:Oxford University Press. 42. Lane, P. J. and M.

Lubatkin(1998). Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning. Strategic Management Journal, pp.461-477. 43. Leeds, R.

(1963). Altruism and the norm of giving. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 9, 229-240. 44. Leonard-Barton, D.(1997

).Wellsprings of knowledge:Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston:Harvard Business School Press. 45. Marlene, Fiol C. &

Marjorie A. Lyles, “Organizational learning, “ Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 20, pp.41-57(1985). 46. Marquardt, M.J. & Reynolds, A.(1994).The Global Learning Organization, N.Y.:IRWIN. 47. Marquardt, M.J.(1996),Building The Learning Organization:A System Approach to Quantum and Global Success, London McGraw-Hill. 48. Maslow, A. H., Motivation and Personality. NY:Harper and Row Publishers,1954. 49. Mcgill, M. E.,Slocum,J.W.&Lei,D.(1992).Management Practices in Learning Organizations, Organizational Dynamics,21

(1),5-17. 50. Morrison, E.W.(1994),”Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior:The Importance of Employee’s Perspective”, Academy of Management Review,14(2),pp.157-169. 51. Musen, A. M., “Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse,”

Computers and Bio-Medical Research, Vol.25, pp.435-467(1992). 52. Newell, A., “The Knowledge Level,”Artif Intel, Vol.18, pp.187-127

(1982). 53. Newell, Swan, Galliers , and Scarbrough(1999).The Intranet as a Knowledge management tool?Creating New Electronic Fences. In M Khosrowpour (ed), Managing Information Technology Resources In The Next Millennium. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 1999 IRMA Information Conference 17-19 May, Hershey, USA,pp.612-619. 54. Noe R. A.(1999).Employee Training &

Development, Singapore:McGraw-Hill. 55. Nonaka Ikujiro & Hirotaka Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company , Oxford University Press, Inc.,1995.楊子江、王美音譯, 創新求勝:智價企業論,台北:遠流出版社,1997。 56. O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman & Caldwell(1991

),People and organization culture:A profile comparison approach to assessing P-O fit, Academy of Management Journal 34(3),487-516. 57.

Polanyi , M.(1966).“ The Tacit Dimension”(London,Routledge & Keegan Paul) 58. Quinn, J.B., Intelligent Enterprise. A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. NY:The Free Press,1992. 59. Schein, E.H,(1985), Organizational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass Inc. 60. Senge, P. M., (1990), The fifth discipline--The art and practice of the learning organization. NY:Doubleday. 61. Senge, Peter(1998).

”Sharing Knowledge ”,Executive Excellence, Vol.15,No.6.pp.11-12. 62. Stewart, T.A.(1997), “Intellectual Capital:The NewWealth of Organization”, New York:Doubleday. 63. Stott, K.& Walker, A. (1995) Teams, Teamwork, & Teambuilding: The Manager’s Complete Guide To Teams In Organizations, New York:Prentice Hall. 64. Tampoe, M., (1993)”Motivating Knowledge Workers-The Challenge for The 1990s,”Long Range Planning, Vol.26,49-55. 65. Tobin,D.R.(1993),Re-educating the Corporation:Foundations for the Learning

(4)

Organization, V.T:Oliver Wight. 66. Ulrich, D., Gilnow, M. A.,&Jick,T.(1993),High-Impact Learning:Building and Diffusing Learning Capability. Organization Dynamics,Autumn,52-66. 67. Watkins, K. E. & Marsick, V. J.(1993). Sculpting the learning organization, San Francisco:Jossey Bass. 68. Weiss, D., R. Dawis, G. England, and L. Lofquist, (1967) Manual of the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire

Minneapolis , MN.: University of Minnesota Industrial Relations Center. 69. Wick, C. W. & Leon,L.S.(1995)From ideas to action:Creating a learning organization. Human Resource Management,34 (2),299-311. 70. Thibaut J. W. and Kelley, H.(1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. : New York: Wiley.

參考文獻

相關文件

• elearning pilot scheme (Four True Light Schools): WIFI construction, iPad procurement, elearning school visit and teacher training, English starts the elearning lesson.. 2012 •

DVDs, Podcasts, language teaching software, video games, and even foreign- language music and music videos can provide positive and fun associations with the language for

The min-max and the max-min k-split problem are defined similarly except that the objectives are to minimize the maximum subgraph, and to maximize the minimum subgraph respectively..

The grade of the children, education level of parents, the occupation of parents, and the number of times meals are cooked at home have a significant influence on a perception

1、 Focusing on the unit of “circle”, the variation of the learning achievement between the experimental group and the control group reached significant difference3. The variation

The results indicated that packaging of products which reflects local cultural characteristics has a direct and positive influence on consumers’ purchase

Investigating the effect of learning method and motivation on learning performance in a business simulation system context: An experimental study. Four steps to

Effectiveness of Simulation on Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Retention, and Self-Efficacy of Nursing Students in Jordan. Situated Learning Theory: The Key to Effective