• 沒有找到結果。

產品知覺對購買意願之影響 : 以進口葡萄為例 劉靜怡、胡瓊元

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "產品知覺對購買意願之影響 : 以進口葡萄為例 劉靜怡、胡瓊元"

Copied!
2
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

產品知覺對購買意願之影響 : 以進口葡萄為例 劉靜怡、胡瓊元

E-mail: 9901036@mail.dyu.edu.tw

摘 要

近年來國人在生活水準提升及對水果之總需求量增加下,於是對葡萄之需求亦形增加,加入WTO後,國內進口水果產品 不但愈來愈增加且更多樣化,產品競爭亦愈形激烈,本研究經由以往文獻及邏輯之推理,希望釐清產品知覺、來源國形象 與購買意願間之關係。 本研究是透過問卷調查方式,總共發放480份問卷,回收472份,廢除無效問卷14份,取得有效問 卷458份,有效回收率為95.4%。 採SPSS統計分析工具,對樣本資料做敘述性統計、交叉分析檢定、信度、效度分析、因 素分析及迴歸分析以檢定研究假設。 結果本研究發現,(1)進口葡萄之消費者只與職業呈顯著關係。(2)產品知覺的「品質意 識」及「功能需求」、「選購需求」與「購買意願」呈顯著正向影響。(3)來源國形象的「信任程度」對於「購買意願」呈 顯著正向影響。

關鍵詞 : 產品知覺 ; 來源國形象 ; 購買意願

目錄

內容目錄 中文摘要 ..................... iii 英文摘要 ................

..... iv 誌謝辭  ..................... v 內容目錄 ...............

...... vi 表目錄  ..................... viii 圖目錄  .............

........ x 第一章  緒論................... 1   第一節  研究背景與動機...

......... 1 第二節  研究目的與問題............ 3   第三節  研究範圍與對象....

........ 4   第四節  研究方法與流程............ 4 第二章  文獻探討........

......... 6   第一節  產品知覺............... 6   第二節  購買意願.....

.......... 12   第三節  來源國形象.............. 15 第三章  研究方法.....

............ 17 第一節  研究架構............... 17 第二節  操作性定義與衡量工 具......... 17   第三節  研究假設............... 21   第四節  樣本與資料收集

............ 23   第五節  問卷前測............... 23   第六節  資料分析方 法............. 28 第四章  資料分析與研究結果............ 30 第一節  問卷基本資 料分析........... 30   第二節  交叉表統計與檢定........... 33   第三節  信度分 析............... 38   第四節  效度分析............... 38   第五節  因 素分析............... 40   第六節  相關係數分析............. 39   第七節   迴歸分析............... 47 第五章  研究結果與建議.............. 52 第一節   研究結論............... 52   第二節  管理意涵............... 54   第三 節  研究限制............... 54   第四節  未來研究建議............. 55 參考 文獻 ..................... 56 附錄  研究問卷................. 64 參考文獻

一、中文部份 中華民國關稅總局(2008),海關進、出口貿易統計[線上資料]來源:

http://web.customs.gov.tw/statistic/statistic/statisticList.asp [2009, March 18]。 甘美玲(2006),知覺價格、知覺品質、知覺價值對購買意願 之關係研究-以消費者購買數位內容產品為實證,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班未出版之碩士論文。 吳統雄(1990),電話調查理 論與方法(2版),台北市:聯經出版社。 沈玉瑛(2001),競爭策略與訂價策略配合對新產品績效影響之研究-以產品專利類型為分析,私立 中原大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 李奇勳(2000),價格、保證及來源國形象對產品評價與購買意願的影響,國立成功大學企 業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。 何昭賢(2000),「手段-目的鏈」模式之應用研究-以高涉入住宅產品為例,淡江人文社會學刊,16

,20-26。 周文賢,張欽富(2000),聯合分析在產品設計之運用,台北市:華泰書局。 徐敏嘉(2003),來源國形象認知與消費者價格敏感度 之研究,私立中國文化大學國際貿易系未出版之碩士論文。 陳俊郎(2000),國家形象對產品評估與購買決策的影響,私立銘傳大學企業 管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 陳俊碩(2004),品牌來源國國家形象、產品知識與產品涉入程度對消費者購買決策影響之研究-以保險 及餐飲服務為例,私立真理大學管理科學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 張貞宜(2005),近十年重要農產品產地價格趨勢分析,台北市:行政 院農糧屬。 張春興(1988),心理學(24版),台北市:東華書局。 張重昭,謝千之(2000),產品資訊、參考價格與知覺品質對消 費者行為之

(2)

影響,企業管理學報,47,161-190。 黃俊英(2002),多變量分析(7版),台北:中國經濟企業研究所。 葉桂鳳(1999),社會影響力對產品來 源國形象的增強效果-以 送禮行為為例,國立政治大學國際貿易學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 廖春美(2006),來源國及品種特性對消費 者購買蘋果行為決定之影響,私立嶺東科技大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 蔡東俊,李奇勳 (1999),消費者特性與網際網路購物意願關 係之研究,管理學報,88(4),557-580.。 二、英文部分 Allison, R. I., & Uhl, K. P. (1964). Influence of beer brand identificaion on

tastePerception. Journal of Marketing Research, 1, 36-39. Babom, B. J., Hardesty, D. M., & Suter, T.A. (2003). Color and shopping intention: The intervewing effect of price fairneand perc-eived affect. Journal of Business Research, 56(7), 541-551. Bilkey, W. J., & Erik, N. (1982).

Country-of-Origin Effect on Product Evaluation. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 89-99. Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequence. Jurnal of MarketinResearch, 36(2), 187-199. Cordell, V. (1992). Effect of consumer preferences for foreign source product. Journal of International Business Studies, second quarter, 251-299. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991).

Effects of price, brand, and store information on Buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319. Dodds, W. B., &

Monroe, K. B. (1985). The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 85-90.

Grewal, D., Krishnanl, R., Baker, J., & Borin, N. (1998). The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers’ evaluations and phase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 331-352. Holbrok, M. B., & Corfinan, K. P. (1985). Quality and value in the consumption experience: Phacdrus rides again. In J. Jacoby and J. Olson (Eds.), Perceived Quality(pp. 31-57). Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Leexington Books. Jacoby, J., Olson, J., & Haddock, R. (1971). Price, brand name and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 570- 579. Jocoby, J., Szybillo, G. J., & Busato, S. J. (1977). Information acquisition behavior in brand choice situations. Journal of Consumer Reearch, 3, 209-216. Johny, K. J., & Paul, C. (1984). Image variables in multi attribute product evaluations:

Country-of-origin effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 694-699. Kaplan, L. B., Jacoby, J., & Szybillo, G. (1974). Components of perceived risk in product purchase: A cross-validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(3), 287-291. Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing Management(10th ed.).

New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International Inc. Li, Z. G., Shenzhao, F., & Murray, L. W. (1997). Country and product images: The perceptions of consumers in the People’s requblic of China. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 10(1/2), 115-137. Lictenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N.

M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of marketing research, 30, 234-245.

Liefeld, J. P. (1993). Experiments on country-of-origin effects: Review and meta-analysis of effect size. In N. Papadopoul and L. Heslop(Eds.), Product-Country Image(pp. 117-156). New York: International Business Press. Luz, R. (1986). Quality is as quality does: An attitudinal perspective on consumer quality judgments. Presentation to the Marketing Science Institute Trustees. Massachusetts: Cambridge. Martin, I. M., & Eroglu, S.

(1993). Measuring a multi-dimen-ional construct. Journal of Business Research, 28, 191-210 Maxwell, S. (2001). Rule-based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase. Jurnal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 191-212. Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The effect of price on subjective product evaluations. In J. Jaco and J. Olson(Eds.), Perceived Quality(pp. 209-232). Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books. Monroe, K. B. (1990). Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which “Intender” actually buy? Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 391-405. Nagashima, A. (1970). A comparison of Japanese and U. S. attitudes toward foreign products. Journal of Marketing, 34(1), 68-74. Olson, J. C. (1977). Price as an informaiton cue: Effect in product evaluation. In M. Venkatesan and P. Collede (Eds.), Procedding of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research(pp. 167-179). Maryland: Association for Cousumer Research. Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 66-387. Peterson, R., & Jolibert, A. (1995). A meta-analysis of country-of- origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 883-900.

Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 351-357. Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store bran quality. Journal of Marketing, 58, 28-36. Samiee, S. (1994). Customer evaluation of product in a global market. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 579-604. Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects.

Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158-174. Suter, T. A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2005). Maximizing earnings and price fariness perceptions in online consumer-to-consumer auctions. Journal of Retailing, 81(4), 307-317. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Szybillo, G. J., & Jacoby, J. (1974). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic cues as determinants of perceived product quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 74-78. Teas, R. K., & Agarwal, S. (2000). The effect of extrinsic product cues on consumers’

perception of quality, sacfifice, and value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 278-290. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-214. Winer, R. (1988). Behavioral perspectives on pricing: Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price revisited. In Timothy De Vinney (Ed.), Issues in Pricing: Theory and Research (pp. 35-37). Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington. Zeithaml, V. A.

(1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.

參考文獻

相關文件

On the contrary, apart from the 18.95% decrease of the price index of Education, reduced charges for mobile phone services and lower rentals for housing drove the price indices

Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.. The Nature of

As to the effects of internet self-efficacy on information ethics, students who get high, middle, and low scores on basic computer operation also perform differently on

“ Consumer choice behavior in online and traditional supermarkets: the effects of brand name, price, and other search attributes”, International Journal of Research in Marketing,

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), brand image, product attributes, purchase intention, Structural Equation Models (SEM)... 誌

and Kasper, H.D.P., “The impact of Satisfaction on Brand Loyalty: Urging on Classifying Satisfaction and Brand Loyalty,” Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction

Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the segments for wine consumers in Taiwan by product, brand decision, and purchasing involvement, and then determine the

Our major findings are: (1)The sex of consumers have significant effects on reverse product design but the remaining factors.(2)The mar- riage status of consumers