本研究從教學與研究上提出以下建議，作為日後教師進行類似教學活動或 研究者進行相關研究之參考。
一、教學實務上的建議
（一）關於高先備知識學生
研究發現，高先備知識學生的筆記品質與立即學習成效有顯著正相關，因 此，分享式數位筆記教學活動對於高先備知識學生應是有效的，教師可以採用，
且可以試著教導高先備知識學生更高階的寫筆記技巧，提昇其筆記品質。研究 也發現，高先備知識學生若在同質組能提昇其立即學習成效，因此，教師應該 多教導高先備知識學生如何與能力不及自己的同學一起合作、學習，能夠相互 幫助且不至於降低學習成效。
（二）關於低先備知識學生
研究發現，低先備知識學生的筆記品質與學習成效沒有顯著相關，表示低 先備知識學生對於自己的筆記內容很可能沒有充分理解，只是將內容逐字記下 而已，甚至是使用複製貼上的功能抄襲組員的筆記，因此，教師應該要特別留 意先備知識不足或能力較低的學生，避免筆記抄襲的情形發生，適當的時候也 要給予幫助，並教導正確的寫筆記方式，不能單純將內容記下卻未經思考與整 理，這樣無益於學習成效。研究也發現，低先備知識學生若在異質組能提昇其 筆記品質，因此教師也應該關注異質組中的合作過程，避免低先備知識學生是 透過搭便車的方式，反而沒有真正進行學習。研究也發現，低先備知識學生若 使用提問策略複習筆記能提昇其立即學習成效，因此，建議教師未來若在教學 時導入寫筆記策略，可以特別針對低先備知識學生進行提問策略的教學與訓練，
促進其理解並進而提昇其學習成效。
72
二、未來研究上的建議
（一）檢視課堂中每一個小組的互動過程
本研究讓學生以小組進行分享式數位筆記活動，主要蒐集學生的筆記品質、
學習成效與態度等量化資料。不過根據研究結果與討論，顯示低先備知識學生 可能是透過搭便車甚至用複製貼上的方式而產出較高品質的筆記，但卻沒有真 正學習到。因此，除了量化資料外，小組內的學生於課堂中是如何分享筆記、
合作或是口頭討論的內容都是值得關注的。Gijlers 與 de Jong（2005）也提到，
教師應該要留意小組內的學習過程，並且在需要的時候介入。因此，建議未來 研究可以於課堂中透過錄影的方式將小組的互動過程記錄下來和利用電腦系統 記錄學生使用電腦寫筆記的完整資訊，以進行進一步的分析、探討。
（二）採用不同的科技工具進行並擴展至其他學科
本研究以分享式數位筆記的形式於資訊課堂中進行教學活動，學生使用 PC 透過滑鼠、鍵盤打字來記錄數位筆記，並藉由網路平台將筆記分享給組員。結 果顯示，學生於資訊課堂中使用 PC 進行分享式數位筆記活動應是可實行的。
建議未來研究可以採用不同的科技工具（例如：筆記型電腦、平板電腦）並採 用其他學科進行分享式數位筆記活動，了解其可行性及對學生的幫助，推廣分 享式數位筆記活動，讓學生能從中受益。
73
參考文獻
中文部分
李登隆、王美芬（2004）。資訊融入專題導向學習對國小學生自然科學習態度與 問題解決能力之影響。科學教育研究與發展季刊，69-94。
林清山（1997）。教育心理學：認知取向。台北市：遠流。
辜玉旻（2007）。提升學童科學文章的閱讀理解：運用附加問題與做筆記策略。
行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告（計畫編號 NSC 95-2511-S-008-001-）。
黃克文（1996）。認知負荷與個人特質及學習成就之關聯。國立台北師範學院 國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃政傑、林佩璇（1996）。合作學習。台北：五南圖書。
詹志禹（1993）。認知學派在教學方法上的應用。政大機構典藏。
張春興（2009）。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：臺灣東華。
陳品華（2009）。大學生的先備知識、課堂筆記策略與學業表現之關係研究。
行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告（計畫編號 NSC 97-2410-H-153-001-）。
魏永興、邱佳椿（2011）。以認知學派之學習理論為基礎的教育理念。雄工學報，
10，237-246。
74
英文部分
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social
behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Person &
R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal
of Science Education, 25(9), 1043-1047.
Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York Worth Publishers.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A
cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wins.
Baker, L., & Lombardi, B. R. (1985). Students' lecture notes and their relation to test performance. Teaching of Psychology, 12(1), 28-32.
Barnett, J. E., Di Vesta, F. J., & Rogozinski, J. T. (1981) What is learned in note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 181-192.
Barnett, J. E., & Freud, D. (1985). Prior knowledge and the generative theory of
notetaking. Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational
Research Association. Chicago.
Bauer, A., & Koedinger, K. (2006, 5-7 July 2006). Pasting and encoding:
Note-taking in online courses. In Proceedings of Advanced Learning
Technologies, 2006. Sixth International Conference on (pp. 789-793).
Beane, W. E. (1971). Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual behavior.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(3), 215-218.
75
Boyle, J. (1996). Thinking while notetaking: Teaching college students to use strategic notetaking during lectures. In B. G. Brown (Ed.), Innovative
learning strategies: Twelfth yearbook (pp. 9–18). Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
Boyle, J. R. (2001). Enhancing the notetaking skills of students with mild disabilities.
Intervention in School & Clinic, 36, 221–225.
Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1981). Note-taking and passage style. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 73(2), 242-250.
Call, P. E. (2000). Reflective questioning: A strategy to review notes. Journal of
Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 487.
Carrier, C. (1983). Notetaking research: Implications for the classroom. Journal of
Instructional Development, 6(3), 19-26.
Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information. Instructional Science, 29(6), 443-479.
Chen, C. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2011). Integrating blogs into elementary classrooms:
Shared note taking and questioning review. In F. Dong (Ed.), Proceedings of
the 2nd International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering (pp.
6629-6633). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Chiu, C. H. (2002). The effects of collaborative teamwork on secondary science.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 262-271.
Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 63(1), 8-14.
Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1973). Listening and note taking: Ii. Immediate and delayed recall as functions of variations in thematic continuity, note taking, and length of listening-review intervals. Journal of Educational Psychology,
76
64(3), 278-287.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge.
Review of Educational Research, 69(2), 145-186.
Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1994). Prior knowledge and learning. In T. Husen & T. N.
Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp.
4698-4702). Oxford New York: Pergamon Press.
Dyson, B., & Grineski, S. (2001). Using cooperative learning structures in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 72(2), 28-31.
Ebenezer, J. V., & Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 students' perceptions of and attitudes toward science teaching and school science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 30(2), 175-186.
Faber, J. E., Morris, J. D., & Lieberman, M. G. (2000). The effect of note taking on ninth grade students' comprehension. Reading Psychology, 21, 257-270.
Faust, J. L., & Paulson, D. R. (1998). Active learning in the college classroom.
Excellence in College Teaching, 9(2), 3-24.
Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note taking and review on recall.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 321-325.
Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 25(8), 689-703.
Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2005). The relation between prior knowledge and
students' collaborative discovery learning processes. Journal of Research in
77
Science Teaching, 42(3), 264-282.
Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 197-213.
Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. The American
psychologist, 39(2), 93-104.
Hartley, J. (1983). Note-taking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of the
British Psychological, 36, 13-14.
Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note‐taking: A critical review. Innovations in
Education & Training International, 15(3), 207-224.
Hembree, R., & Dessart, D. J. (1986). Effects of hand-held calculators in precollege mathematics education: A meta-analysis. Journal for research in
mathematics education, 83-99.
Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. (1988). Cooperative cbi: The effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts. Journal of educational computing research, 4(4), 413-424.
Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. (1991). The effects of group composition on
achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development,
39(3), 27-40.
Hopkins, K. D. (1998). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Howe, M. J. (1970). Using students' notes to examine the role of the individual learner in acquiring meaningful subject matter. Journal of educational
research, 64, 61-63.
78
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (1986). Revised circle of learning:
Cooperation in the classroom. Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (1994). Cooperative Learning in the
classroom. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences,
learning, and instruction. Part vii, prior knowledge. Hillsdale: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Katayama, A. D., & Crooks, S. M. (2003). Online notes: Differential effects of studying complete or partial graphically organized notes. The Journal of
Experimental Education, 71(4), 293-312.
Katayama, A. D., Shambaugh, R. N., & Doctor, T. (2005). Promoting knowledge transfer with electronic note taking. Teaching of Psychology, 32(2), 129-131.
Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 23-32.
Kiewra, K. A. (1988). Cognitive aspects of autonomous note taking: Control processes, learning strategies, and prior knowledge. Educational
Psychologist, 23(1), 39-56.
Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147-172.
Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., Kim, S.-I., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995).
Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(2), 172-187.
Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., &
Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240-245.
79
Kiewra, K. A., & Fletcher, H. J. (1984). The relationship between notetaking variables and achievement measures. Human Learning, 3, 273-280.
King, A. (1991). Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(4), 331-346.
King, A. (1992a). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American
Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303-323.
King, A. (1992b). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 111-126.
Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational
Psychology, 26(3), 459-477.
Laidlaw, E. N., Skok, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1993). The effects of notetaking and self-questioning on quiz performance. Science Education, 77(1), 75-82.
Landay, J. A. (1999, 10-13 Nov. 1999). Using note-taking appliances for student to student collaboration. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference,
1999. FIE '99. 29th Annual (pp. 12C14/15-12C14/20 vol.12).
Lee, P.-L., Lan, W., Hamman, D., & Hendricks, B. (2008). The effects of teaching notetaking strategies on elementary students’ science learning. Instructional
Science, 36(3), 191-201.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S.
(1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational
Research, 66(4), 423-458.
Marx, J. D., & Cummings, K. (2007). Normalized change. American Journal of
Physics, 75(1), 87-91.
80
Matthew, K., Jingtao, W., Alastair, I., Eric, T., Jane, C., Daniel, G., et al. (2005).
Livenotes: A system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures.
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Portland, Oregon, USA.
Mayer, E. R. (1987). Educational Psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little Brown.
Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (1984). Measurement and evaluation in education
and psychology (3 ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education,
25(9), 1049-1079.
Palkovitz, R. J., & Lore, R. K. (1980). Note taking and note review: Why students fail questions based on lecture material. Teaching of Psychology, 7(3), 159-161.
Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 70(4), 514-522.
Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 34-38.
Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., & Garner, J.
(2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational
Psychology, 99, 167-180.
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291-312.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta &
81
Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of child development (Vol. 4): JAI, Greenwich, Connecticut.
Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for
educators, researchers and policymakers. New York: Harper Collins College
Pulishers.
Rakes, T. A., & Scott, S. M. (1983). Using teacher/student generated questions.
Paper presented at the 21st Florida Reading Association. Hollywood, FL.
Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3(2), 136-143.
Riley, J. D., & Dyer, J. (1979) The Effects of Notetaking While Reading or Listening.
Reading World, 19(1), 51–56.
Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2005). Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional
Science, 33(2), 105-119.
Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Schunk, D. H. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective (4th ed.).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Siegler, R. S., & Klahr, D. (1982). When do children learn? The relationship between existing knowledge and the acquisition of new knowledge. In R.
Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 121-211).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Singh, G., Denoue, L., & Das, A. (2004). Collaborative note taking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and
82
Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'04).
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement:
Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of
educational research, 95(6), 323-332.
Smith, M., Teske, R., & Gossmeyer, M. (2000). Improving student achievement
through the enhancement of study skills. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 441256).
Strough, J., & Covatto, A. M. (2002). Context and age differences in same- and other-gender peer preferences. Social Development, 11(3), 346-361.
Swanson, P. N., & De La Paz, S. (1998). Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in
School and Clinic, 33(4), 209-218.
Swing, S. R., & Peterson, P. L. (1982). The relationship of student ability and small-group interaction to student achievement. American Educational
Research Journal, 19(2), 259-274.
Thomas, A. (1993). Study skills. Eugene: Oregon School Study Council.
Thompson, R. A., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2003). Prior knowledge and its relevance to student achievement in introduction to psychology. Teaching of Psychology,
30(2), 96-101.
Trawick-Smith, J. (2003). Early childhood development, a multicultural perspective.
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students' interest in physics.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 47-58.
Van Der Meij, H. (1994). Student questioning: A componential analysis. Learning
and Individual Differences, 6(2), 137-161.
83
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.).
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ward, N., & Tatsukawa, H. (2003). A tool for taking class notes. International
Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6), 959-981.
Webb, N. M. (1982). Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(5), 642-655.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative activity. Educational Psychologist,
11, 87-95.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of
Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.
Zakaria, E., & Iksan, Z.(2007). Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics Education: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 35-39.
84
附錄
附錄一、第一單元教學教材-網頁的內容與存取
85
86
87
附錄二、第二單元教學教材-檔案分享
88
89
90
附錄三、第三單元教學教材-電腦連線上網的方式
91
92
附錄四、第四單元教學教材-影像檔案
93
94
95
附錄五、各單元之雙向細目表
第一單元-網頁的內容與存取
教學內容 知識 理解 應用 分析 綜合 評鑑 各項網頁元素（文
字、圖片、超連結）
的作用
［陳述性知識］
4, 10 18 13
各項網頁元素（文 字、圖片、超連結）
的格式及屬性
［陳述性知識］
1, 5, 8, 9, 20
2, 3, 7 6, 11
瀏覽器的作用和舉例
［陳述性知識］
15, 17 14
伺服器的作用和舉例
［陳述性知識］
16
電腦取得網頁的程序
［陳述性知識］
12 19
題數總計 7 6 3 4
96
第二單元-檔案分享
教學內容 知識 理解 應用 分析 綜合 評鑑 FTP 的原理
［陳述性知識］
1, 11 5, 6
FTP 的操作方式
［程序性知識］
3, 9 4, 13
FTP 的特性
［陳述性知識］
7 2, 8, 10
P2P 的原理
［陳述性知識］
17
P2P 的操作方式
［程序性知識］
16, 19
P2P 的特性
［陳述性知識］
12, 14, 15, 20
18
題數總計 5 9 2 4
97
第三單元-電腦連線上網的方式
教學內容 知識 理解 應用 分析 綜合 評鑑 有線網路的設備與媒
介
［陳述性知識］
1, 20 2
有線網路的特性
［陳述性知識］
11, 19 18
無線網路的設備與媒 介
［陳述性知識］
13, 16 12
無線網路的特性
［陳述性知識］
3, 6, 7 15
常見的連線方式
［陳述性知識］
4, 5, 10 17 8, 9, 14
題數總計 4 8 4 4
98
第四單元-影像檔案
教學內容 知識 理解 應用 分析 綜合 評鑑 電腦影像的色彩與構
成
［陳述性知識］
11 15, 17
電腦影像的壓縮和失 真
［陳述性知識］
19 14, 18 16
電腦影像的格式－
BMP
［陳述性知識］
1 20 13
電腦影像的格式－
JPG
［陳述性知識］
［陳述性知識］