第六章 結論與建議
6.2 建議
1. 本研究使用同一個體重複觀測的敘述性偏好資料，然而情境設計當中並未調 整各方案之旅行時間，建議未來研究在設計情境時可以伴隨尖離峰情境加入 時間調整水準，以更明顯知道個體於尖離峰時之時間敏感度是否對選擇行為 產生影響。
2. 本研究的選擇行為涉及運具及路線選擇並以多項羅吉特模式處理之，建議後 續研究可以加入巢式羅吉特模式作為處理不同運具間異質性的方法。
3. 本研究建議後續研究在探討個體異質性時可以加入混合羅吉特模式做為比 較，並依混合羅吉特模式探討個體對方案屬性偏好之隨機變化是否符合混合 羅吉特模式假設之分布型態。
68
參考文獻
1. 葉怡君，「高速公路電子計程收費系統下小汽車駕駛人旅運行為之研究」，
國立暨南國際大學土木工程學系，碩士論文，民國 100 年。
2. 陳一昌等，能源消耗、汙染排放與車輛使用之整合關聯模式研究(2/3)，初版，
交通部運輸研究所，民國 98 年。
3. 交通部運輸研究所，國家永續發展之城際運輸系統需求模式研究，民國 97 年。
4. 交通部台灣區國道高速公路局，高速公路按里程電子收費通行費率之研究，
民國 97 年。
5. 交通部，「國道計程收費階段通行費率相關情境模擬式算報告」，民國 101 年。
6. 交通部，「2013 年起國道高速公路電子計程收費之實施效益、通行費率之 收費標準及相關制度措施，並就現階段收費系統架設執行情形及車輛安裝 e-Tag 進而衍生用路人有多道手續費用遭政府及財團有感剝削、電磁波恐干 擾用路人身心狀態等之疑慮專案報告」，民國 101 年。
7. Axhausen, K. W., Hess, S., K ̈nig, A., Abay, G., 2008. Income and distance elasticities of travel time savings: New Swiss results. Transport Policy, vol. 15, pp. 173-185.
8. Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S., 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Predict Travel Demand. MIT Press.
9. Bhat, C. R., 1997. An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel. Transportation Science, Vol. 31, pp. 34-48.
10. Bhat, C. R., Sardesai, R., 2006. The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice. Transportation Research Part B, vol. 40, pp.709-730.
11. Brownstone D., Ghosh, A., Golob, T. F., Kazimi, C., Amelsfort, D. V., 2003.
Drivers’ willingness-to-pay to reduce travel time: evidence from the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project. Transportation Research Part A, vol. 37, pp.373-387.
12. Brownstone D., Small K. A., 2005. Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from pricing demonstrations. Transportation Research Part A, vol. 39, pp. 279-293.
13. Chiou, Y. C., Jou, R. C., Kao, C.Y., Fu, C., 2013. The adoption behaviours of freeway electronic toll collection: A latent class modelling approach.
Transportation Research Part E, vol. 49, pp.266-280.
14. Devarasetty, P. C., Burris, M., Shaw, W. D., 2012. The value of travel time and reliability-evidence from a staed preference survey and actual usage.
Transportation Research Part A, vol. 46, pp. 1227-1240.
15. Espino, R., Ort ́zar, J. D., Rom ́ , C., 2007. Understanding suburban travel demand: Flexible modeling with revealed and stated choice data. Transportation Research Part A, vol. 41, pp. 899-912.
16. Greene, W. H., Hensher, D. A., 2003. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B, vol. 37, pp.681-698.
17. Hess, S., Daly, A., Rohr, C., Hyman, G., 2007. On the development of time period and mode choice models for use in large scale modeling forecasting systems. Transportation Research Part A, vol. 41, pp. 802-826.
18. Hess, S., Greene, E. R., Falzarano, C. S., Muriello, M., 2011. Pay to drive in may bus lane: A stated choice analysis for the proposed Lincoln Tunnel HOT lane into Manhattan. Transport Policy, vol. 18, pp. 649-656.
19. Jou, R. C., Chiou, Y. C., Chen, K. H., Tan, H. I., 2012. Freeway drivers’
willingness-to-pay for a distance-based toll rate. Transportation Research Part A, vol. 46, pp.549-559.
20. Kockelman, K. M., Kalmanje, S., 2005. Credi-based congestion pricing: a policy proposal and the public’s response. Transportation Research Part A, vol. 39, pp.
671-690.
21. Lam, T. C., Small, K. A., 2001. The value of time and reliability: measurement from a value pricing experiment. Transportation Research Part E, vol. 37, pp.231-251.
22. McFadden, D. L., 1984. Econometric Analysis of Qualitative Response Models.
Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 2, pp.1395-1457.
23. Olszewski, P., Xie, L., 2005. Modelling the effect of road pricing on traffic in Singapore. Transportation Research Part A, vol. 39, 755-772.
24. Shen, J., Sakata, Y., Hashimoto, Y., 2006. A Comparison between Latent Class Model and Mixed Logit Model for Transport Mode Choice: Evidences from Two Datasets of Japan. Discussion Papers In Economics And Business,Osaka
University, 06-05.
25. Vrtic, M., Schuessler, N., Erath, A., Axhausen, K. W., 2009. The impact of road pricing on route and mode choice behavior. Journal of choice modeling, vol.3, pp.
109-126.
26. Walker J., Ben-Akiva, M., 2002. General random utility model. Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 43, pp. 303-343.
70
27. Washbrook, K., Haider, W., Jaccard, M., 2006. Estimating commuter mode choice: A discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges. Transportation,vol. 33, pp. 621-639
28. Yamamoto, T., Fujii, S., Kitamura, R., Yoshida, H., Sakyo, K., 2000. Analysis of time allocation, departure time, and route choice behavior under congestion pricing. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1725, pp. 95-101.
附錄一：高速公路通行費按里程計費旅運行為調查問卷
72
□公 車：票價__________元，搭車時間約__________分鐘，等車時間約_________分鐘。
□捷 運：票價__________元，搭車時間約__________分鐘，等車時間約_________分鐘。
□臺 鐵：票價__________元，搭車時間約__________分鐘，等車時間約_________分鐘。
□高 鐵：票價__________元，搭車時間約__________分鐘，等車時間約_________分鐘。
□⑥航 空：票價__________元，搭車時間約__________分鐘，等車時間約_________分鐘。
□未曾有過
□改騎機車行駛平面道路