根據研究結果的發現，本節茲分成未來研究方向與教學應用兩部分提供建 議，首先在未來研究方面：
一、本研究係以量化的研究方式來探討青少年動作表現及學習的情形。建議未來 研究可以增加質性訪談或觀察記錄，以了解執行動作過程中的各項特徵與實 驗參加者的內在想法，做深入的質性探究。
二、本研究採用桌球正手發下旋球為實驗項目，屬於閉鎖式之動作技能，未來研 究可探討開放式的動作技能，探討自我控制回饋方式的表現與學習效果。
三、由本研究結論可知，結合口語及影像的回饋方式能有效地提昇動作技能學習 的效果。未來研究可進一步探索影像回饋在不同年齡階段，是否會隨人類認 知以及動作發展的歷程而有所差別。
再者，就教學應用方面：體育教師在傳授一項新的運動技能時，除了親自 操作與示範之外，亦可使用多媒體的播放及配合 KP 的指導與修正，來加深學習 者對該動作技能的印象，以利於模仿與修正自我的動作。
參考文獻
中文部分
王秋容（1995）。結果獲知與表現獲知對運動技能學習的影響。未出版碩士論文，國立 臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
方正銘（2008）。自我控制回饋頻率對動作表現、學習與錯誤偵察能力的影響及其年齡 差異。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
方正銘、卓俊伶（2008）動作表現與學習的帶寬回饋及年齡效應。臺灣運動心理學報，
13，21-38。
陳孟文、林靜兒（印刷中）。變異練習對青少年桌球技能的表現與學習效應。體育學報。
陳玉芬、卓俊伶（1998）。特定範圍結果獲知對高爾夫推桿動作之空間準確性與錯誤偵 察的影響。體育學報，25，249-258。
陳光紫（2008）。球體大小與選修次數對桌球正手擊球連續對打表現之影響。大專體育 學刊，10（4），17-29。
國立教育資料館（2007）學校體育教材教法與評量-桌球。臺北市：作者。
彭鈺人（1993）。體育測驗與測量。臺北市：師大書苑。
葉俊良、卓俊伶、林靜兒、陳重佑（2007）。自我控制回饋對動作表現、學習及 錯誤估計的效應。大專體育學刊，9，23-35。
楊智能（2000）。影像回饋及其時宜對太極拳動作模彷學習的影響。未出版碩士 論文，國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
賴世烱、卓俊伶（1999)。晚期兒童動作表現的性別與年齡差異。體育學報，27，
43-50。
賴世烱（2000）。兒童動作表現的費茲定律檢驗及訊息處理能力的年齡效應。未 出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
蕭存沂（1998）。桌球運動中發球技術概念之介紹。臺灣體育，107，19-21。
簡桂彬（2001）。不同技能表現獲知對足球內側傳球技能表現的影響。未出版碩 士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
體育大辭典編訂委員會主編（1986）。體育大辭典。臺北市:臺灣商務。
英文部份
Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-149.
Adams, J. A., Gopher, D., & Lintern, G. (1977). Effects of visual and proprioceptive feedback on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 11-22.
Anderson, D. I., Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., & Ryan, G. (2005). Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 231-238.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1993). Pcrceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.
Educational Psychology, 28, 117-148.
Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1985). The role of timing of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 269-281.
Chen, D. D., Hendrick, J. L., & Lidor, R. (2002). Enhancing self-controlled learning environments: The use of self-regulated feedback information. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 43, 69-86.
Chen, D., & Singer, R. N. (1992). Self-regulation and cognitive strategies in sport participation. International Journal Sport Psychology, 23, 277-300.
Chiviacowsky, S., Godinho, M., & Tani, G. (2005). Self-controlled knowledge of results:
Effects of different schedules and task complexity. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 49, 277-296.
Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performance get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408-415.
Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42-48.
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, non-experts, and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 185-206.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Ferrari, M. (1996). Observing the observer: Self-regulation in the observational learning of motor skills. Developmental Review, 16, 203-240.
Gabbard, C. (1992). Lifelong motor development. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
Gallagher, J. D., & Thomas, J. R. (1984). Rehearsal strategy effects of developmental differences for recall of a movement series. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 123-128.
Gallahue, D. L., & Ozmun, J. C. (2006). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Heymen, N., Leue, W., Lindauer, R. & Schulte, H. (1986). Research report on the efficiency of video-feedback in physical education. Sportunterricht, 35(1), 10-15.
Janell, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997).
Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269-279.
Janelle, C. M., Kim, J., & Singer, R. N. (1995). Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 627-634.
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An
integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-690.
Kernodle, M. W., & Carlton, L. G. (1992). Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree of freedom activities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 187-196.
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavior science (2nd ed.).
Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Comparing self-regulatory process among novices, non-experts, and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic study.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 91-105.
Magill, R. A., & Schoenfelder-Zohdi, B. (1996). A visual model and knowledge of performance as sources of information for learning a rhythmic gymnastics skill.
International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 7-22.
Meaney, K. S. (1994). Developmental modeling effects on the acquisition , retention, and transfer of a novel motor task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 31-39.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of result and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2000). Motor learning and performance: A problem-based learning approach (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Shapiro, D. C. (1977). Knowledge of results and motor learning in preschool children.
Research Quarterly, 48, 154-158.
Sherwood, D. E. (1988). Effect of bandwidth Knowledge of results on movement consistency.
Perceptual and Motor Skill, 66, 535-542.
Thomas, J. R., Salazar, W., & Lander, D. M. (1991). What is missing in p < .05? Effect size.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 344-348.
Titzer, R., Shea, J., & Romack, J. (1993). The effect of learner control in the acquisition and retention of a motor task. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(suppl.), S84.
Vallerand, R. J. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In E. L. Deci
& R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 37-63). New York:
University of Rochester Press.
Vincent, W. J. (1995). Statistics in kinesiology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Sands, D. J., Knowlton, H. E., & Kozleski, E. B. (2002). Teaching students with mental retardation: Providing access to the general curriculum. Baltimore: Paul H.
Brookes.
Weiss, M. R., Ebbeck, V., & Rose, D. J. (1992). “Show and tell” in gymnasium revisited:
Developmental differences in modeling and verbal rehearsal effects on motor skill performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 292-301.
Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results
enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
Wrisberg, C. A., & Pein, R. L. (2002). Note on learner’s control of the frequency of model presentation during skill acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 792-794.
Wulf, G., Raupach, M., & Pfeiffer, F. (2005). Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 107-111.
Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44(1), 75-84.
Wulf, G., & Shea, C.H. (2002). Principles derived form the study of simple motor skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 185-211.
Wulf, G., & Toole, T. (1999). Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning:
Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 265-272.
Yao, W. X., Fischman, M. G., & Wang, Y. T. (1994). Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 273-282.
Zecker, S. G. (1982). Mental practice and Knowledge of results in the learning of a perceptual motor skill. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 52-63.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B.
J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic
achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-25). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic learning and achievement:
The emergence of a social-cognitive perspective. Education Psychology Review, 2, 173-201.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimension of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning
and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-12). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M.
Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39).
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student difference in self-regulated learning:
Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
附錄一
桌球正手發下旋球口語回饋表
動作型式之表現獲知的回饋項目 1. 拍面不要上仰太多，磨擦球體底部不要太多。
2. 擊球時，調整拍面角度約45度上仰。
3. 球下降時，約重心高度位置，由左前下方揮擊球體中下方位置。
4. 切到球體後下方時手腕順勢發力，將球往前方標靶位置送。
5. 揮拍擊球路徑是從身體右後上方揮至腹部左前方10公分處。
※根據國立教育資料館的桌球教學影片中，桌球正手發下旋球常見的錯誤 動作及修正要項，並與兩位資深桌球教練共同編制此口語回饋表。
附錄二
專家學者名單及資歷
本研究關於桌球正手發下旋球口語回饋表，茲請兩位桌球教練進行審 閱及提出意見。二位專家學者及其資歷分別敘述如下：
1.江憲宗 教練 資歷：
（1）國家級桌球教練證（A級）
（2）彰化員林地方法院桌球教練 （3）彰化縣溪湖國中桌球教練 （4）彰化縣湖東國小桌球教練 （5）從事桌球訓練15年之久 現任：彰化縣溪湖鎮桌球協會總幹事
2.賴嘉慶 教練 資歷：
（1）國家級桌球裁判證（A級）
（2）98全國運動會桌球裁判 （3）100全國運動會桌球裁判 （4）國立臺灣體育學院兼任講師 （5）從事桌球訓練13年之久
附錄三
附錄四
附錄五
表 3 各組在獲得期、保留與遷移測驗落點得分值的平均數與標準差
表 4 區間在自我控制口語加影像回饋組落點得分值的事後比較表
表 6 保留測驗落點得分值的混合設計二因子變異數分析摘要表