第六章 結論
6.3 後續研究建議
一、 本研究涉及使用標準差來比較兩岸產業之差異，信賴區間容易產生重疊現象，
誤導實證結果，後續者應避免此種誤差。以α =0.05 為例，信賴區間為
，本研究為 36 份樣本，當樣本數越大時越能避免此問 題。
二、 本研究所未能涵蓋所有次產業，建議可以挑選更多子系統產業作為研究對象。
三、 大陸部分資訊不易搜尋，政府偏向資訊不透明化涉及國家安全議題而且許多名 詞與全球不同，需專門深入探討研究。
四、 本研究對象智慧電網產業未發展健全成熟，但本研究皆假設其能順利發展，後 續研究者可自行斟之後產業情勢。
102
參考書目
一、英文部份
1. Aaker, David A. (1995). Strategic Market Management 4th edition, N.J.: John Wiley＆
Sons Inc.
2. Abe, T. (2005). What is service science? Tokyo: The Fujitsu Research Institute Economic Research Center.
3. Ansoff, H.I. (1965). Corporate Strategy, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
4 Aymerich, F. M., Fenu, G., & Surcis, S. (2008). An approach to a cloud computing network.
Paper presented at the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies, 2008.
ICADIWT 2008. First International Conference on the.
5. Barney, J. B. (1997). Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, M.A.:
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
6. Bitran, G., & Pedrosa, L. (1998). A structured product development perspective for service operations. European Management Journal, 16(2), 169-189.
7. Browning, H. L., & Singelmann, J. (1975). The emergence of a service society:
demographic and sociological aspects of the sectoral transformation of the labor force in the U.S.A. Austin: Population Research Center of Texas University.
8. Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., & Venugopal, S. (2008). Market-oriented cloud computing: vision, hype, and reality for delivering IT services as computing utilities. Paper presented at the High Performance Computing and Communications, 2008. HPCC '08. 10th IEEE International Conference on.
9. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
10. Chase, R. B. (1981). The Customer contact approach to services: theoretical bases and practical extensions. Operations Research, 29(4), 698-706.
11. Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2000). Business services in Germany : bridges for innovation: ZEW.
12. Davidow, W. H., & Uttal, B. (1989). Service companies: focus or falter Harvard Business Review, 77-85.
13. Edvardsson, B. (1997). Quality in new service development: Key concepts and a frame of
103
reference. International Journal of Production Economics, 52(1-2), 31-46.
14. Fitzsimmons, J. A., & Fitzsimmons, M. J. (1994). Service management for competitive advantage. New York: Mcgraw-Hill College.
15. Foster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., & Lu, S. (2008). Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. Paper presented at the Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE '08.
16. Gallon, M. R., Stillman, H. M., & Coates, D. (1995). Putting core competency thinking into practice. Research-Technology Management, 38, 20-28.
17. Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 537-556.
18. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33, 114-135.
19. Hauknes, J. (1998). Services in Innovation-Innovation in Services. Oslo: STEP Group：
SI4S Synthesis Paper.
Hayes, R., & Wheelwright, S. (1979). The dynamics of process-product life cycles. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 127-136.
20.Henderson, R., & Clark, K. (1990). Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of
existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 9-30.
21.Herbig, P., & O’Hara, B. (1994). The future of original equipment manufacturers. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 9(3), 38-43.
22.Hertog, P., & Bilderbeek, R. (1998). The New Knowledge Infrastructure：The Role of Technology-Based on Knowledge-Intensive Business in National Innovation System.
London: Continuum.
23.Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. (1985). Strategy Formation：Analytical Concepts: West Publishing Inc.
24.Hunt, I., & Jones, R. (1998). Winning new product business in the contract electronics industry. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18, 130-142.
25.Jeff, M., & R., L. C. (1987). Are Product Specialization and International Diversification Strategies Compatible? Management International Review, 27(3), 38-45.
104
26.Karlsson, C. (1992). Knowledge and material flow in future industrial networks.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 12(7/8), 10-23.
27.Kellogg, D., & Nie, W. (1995). A framework for strategic service management. Journal of Operations Management, 13(4), 323-337.
28.Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
29.Landau, R., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth: National Academy Press.
30.Leidecker, J. K., & Bruno, A. V. (1984). Identifying and Using Critical Success Factors.
Long Rang Planning, 17, 434-451.
31.Lovelock, C. H. (1983). Classifying Service to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights. Journal of Marketing, 47, 9-10.
32.Lundvall, B. (1998). Why study national systems and national styles of innovation?
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(4), 403-422.
33.Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., & Peretto, P. (1997). Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international technological specialization.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(6), 801-826.
34.Meller, R., & Deshazo, R. (2001). Manufacturing system design case study: Multi-Channel manufacturing at Electrical Box & Enclosures. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 20(6), 445-456.
35.OECD, & Sience. (1999). Technology and Industry Scoreboard：Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies. Paris.
36.OECD. (2002). Innovation and Productivity in Services. Paris.
37.Phene, A., Madhok, A., & Liu, K. (2005). Knowledge transfer within the multinational firm: what drives the speed of transfer? Management International Review, 45(53), 53-74.
38.Porter, M. (1998). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance.
New York: Free Press.
39.Prestowitz, C. (2005). Three billion new capitalists: The great shift of wealth and power to the East: Basic Books.Porter M.E., Competitive Advantage, Free Express, New York, 19854
105
40.Porter, M.E., Competitive Advantage Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press, New York, 1985.
41.Robock, S.H., Simmonds, K., International Business and Multinational Enterprises, Richard D. Irwin Inc., 1983.
42.Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W., Industrial Innovation and Public Policy, Frances Printer, London, 1981.
43.Sharif, M.N., Basis For Techno-Economic Policy Analysis, Science & Public Policy, Vol.15, Np.4, pp.217-229, Aug, 1988.
44.Souder, W.E., Managing New Product Innovations, Lexington Books, pp.217-220, 1987 45.Utterback, J.M., Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Harverd Business School Press,
Boston, 1994.
46.Wiersema, F., Customer Intimacy- Pick Your Partners, Shape Your Culture, Win Together, Knowledge Exchange Press, pp.81. 1996.
二、中文部份
1. 司徒達賢(1998)，策略的矩陣分析法基礎，管理評論第十三卷第二期，財團法人光 華管理策進基金會，台北
2. 林建山(2002)，產業政策與產業管理，環球經濟社，台北 3. 徐作聖(1998)，全球科技政策與企業經營，華泰書局，台北 4. 徐作聖(2000)，國家創新系統與競爭力，聯經出版社，台北
5. 徐作聖、邱奕嘉、鄭志強（2003）。產業經營與創新政策。臺北：全華科技圖書。
6. 徐作聖、陳仁帥（2006）。產業分析（二版）。臺北：全華科技圖書。
7. 陳清山 (2008)。智慧型電網的技術發展。中華民國第二十九屆電力工程研討會，財 團法人工業技術研究院。
8. 陳德隆 (2009)。先進電表基礎建設之發展與成本效益評估之研究。行政院之委託台 灣電力公司機關出國報告提要，未出版。
9. 何無忌、 梁佩芳 (2010)，能源資通訊產業之發展與推動
10. 盧俊鼎、何無忌 (2010)，由先進電錶趨勢，談我國 EICT 產業契機與挑戰
106
107
第二部分 問卷說明
一、產業定義及範圍
本研究將智慧電網後端管理系統分為：智慧電表(Smart meter)、電表資訊管理系統 (MDMS)、能源資通訊(EICT)、作為研究對象。並探討其子系統產業之兩岸產業定位。
Power supply Gateway Sensor
Smart meter
Microcontroller
Energy ICT
Energy
Flexible Billing determinant
Resource planning
planning Data storage MDMS
Smart Grid Revenue Protection
Display
End Customer Analysis Real-time
clock
Forecasting
108
二、作答方式說明
如上圖所示，本問卷透過「產業生命週期」與「產業價值鏈」兩大構面來定義『產 業定位』，「產業生命週期」係根據 Utterback [1994] 之理論分為浮動期(新產業興起階 段，技術成形考量重於一切)、變遷期(市場標準已成形，許多企業加入，市場上出現許 多競爭者)和專業期(市場已飽和，創新性減少，市場行銷方式與策略較製造或技術重要) 三階段，而「產業價值鏈」係根據開發中國家的技術發展狀況分為具有研發能力、設計 能力、製造與行銷能力三階段。本問卷將「產業生命週期」細分為五個階段：[A] 專業 期; [B] 介於專業期與變遷期之間; [C] 變遷期; [D] 介於變遷期與浮動期之間; [E] 浮動 期。同時，「產業價值鏈」亦細分為五個階段：[1] 研發能力; [2] 介於研發與設計之間;
[3] 設計能力; [4] 介於設計與製造行銷之間; [5] 製造行銷能力。以智慧電表中的MCU 產業為例，個人認為台灣的MCU的設計能力相對於全球而言，其產業生命週期是介於「變 遷期和專業期」之中，故應勾選[B]，技術能力是介於「研發與設計」階段，故應勾選[2]。
109
110
111