第五章 結論與建議
第三節 後續研究建議
在研究對象上，本研究主要探討業餘攝影愛好者之使用與標記行為，研究對 象因限制僅採小樣本，後續研究可加入如教育程度、學科背景等變項因素，擴大 研究對象與範圍。
另外，從本研究結果可以發現，業餘攝影愛好者與一般使用者確實有著不同
123
的需求，這些特殊族群的需求反應了特殊的行為。因此，本研究建議未來可針對 不同的類型或不同文化背景之社群，進行不同標記行為的比較，瞭解其使用行為 與標記行為之異同。
在研究方法上，本研究盡可能在訪談分析過程中不斷自我反省是否適當地詮 釋受訪者的觀點與經驗，但人類的想法和行為都過於複雜，甚至有許多資訊是無 法用語言明白表達出來的，因此研究方法上必有疏漏之處。因此除了訪談法外，
未來在資料收集上也可使用薩爾特曼隱喻誘引技術（Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique, ZMET）的方式來瞭解使用者言語上無法清楚表達的想法，並從認知 心理學的角度來理解使用者的圖像使用與標記行為，也是未來可研究的方向。
124
125
參考文獻
中文文獻
W. Lawrence Neuman（2002）。當代社會研究法：質化與量化途徑（王佳煌、潘 中道、郭俊賢、黃瑋瑩譯）。台北市：學富文化。(原著出版年：2000 年)
126
潘諾夫斯基（1997）。造型藝術的意義。（李元春譯）。台北市：遠流。(原著出版 年：1983 年)
韓叢耀（2005）。圖像與圖像研究。台北市：威仕曼文化事業股份有限公司。
127
英文文獻
Ames, M., & Naaman, M. (2007). Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile
and online media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference
on Human factors in computing systems.Anagnostopoulos, A., Kumar, R., & Mahdian, M. (2008). Influence and correlation in
social networks. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD
international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining.Armitage, L. H., & Enser, P. G. B. (1997, August 1, 1997). Analysis of user need in image archives. Journal of Information Science, 23(4), 287-299.
ASIS&T. (2006). 2006 annual meeting, seminars & workshops. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from http://www.asis.org/Conferences/AM06/sigcr.html Association, V. R. (2005). Vra core 4.0 beta. Retrieved May 10, 2009, from
http://www.vraweb.org/projects/vracore4/pdfs/VRA_Core4_Intro_beta.pdf
Beaudoin, J. (2007). Flickr image tagging: Patterns made visible Retrieved 2009, April 20, from http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Oct-07/beaudoin.html
Benenson, F. (2009). Celebrate 100 million cc photos on flickr with joi ito's free souls.
Creative Commons, 2009, from http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/12540
Bentley, F., Metcalf, C., & Harboe, G. (2006). Personal vs. Commercial content: The
similarities between consumer use of photos and music. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems.Chi, E. H., & Mytkowicz, T. (2008). Understanding the efficiency of social tagging
systems using information theory. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the
nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia.Cole, M. J., & Gwizdka, J. (2008). Tagging semantics: Investigations with wordnet.
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries.
Cox, A. M., Clough, P. D., & Marlow, J. (2008). Flickr: A first look at user behaviour in the context of photography as serious leisure. Information Research, 13(1), 5.
Davies, J. (2006). Affinities and beyond! Developing ways of seeing in online spaces.
E-Learning, 3(2), 217-234.
128
Ding, Y., Toma, I., Kang, S.-J., Zhang, Z., & Fried, M. (2008). Mediating and
analyzing social data. In On the move to meaningful internet systems: Otm 2008 (pp. 1355-1366).
Farooq, U., Kannampallil, T. G., Song, Y., Ganoe, C. H., Carroll, J. M., & Giles, L.
(2007). Evaluating tagging behavior in social bookmarking systems: Metrics and
design heuristics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2007 international
ACM conference on Supporting group work.Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., & Dumais, S. T. (1987). The
vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Commun. ACM, 30(11), 964-971.
Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2005). The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Arxiv preprint cs.DL/0508082.
Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Inf. Sci., 32(2), 198-208.
Gordon-Murnane, L. (2006). Social bookmarking, folksonomies, and web 2.0 tools.
Searcher, 14(6), 26-38.
Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B., & Scott, J. (2005). Social bookmarking tools (i).
D-Lib Magazine, 11(4), 1082-9873.
Hayman, S. (2007). Folksonomies and tagging: New developments in social
bookmarking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Ark Group Conference:
Developing and Improving Classification Schemes. from
www.educationau.edu.au/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/papers/arkhayman .pdf
Heckner, M., Mühlbacher, S., & Wolff, C. (2008). Tagging tagging. Analysing user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems. Journal of Digital
Information, 9(2).
Heckner, M., Neubauer, T., & Wolff, C. (2008). Tree, funny, to_read, google: What
are tags supposed to achieve? A comparative analysis of user keywords for different digital resource types. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 2008
ACM workshop on Search in social media.House, N. V., Davis, M., Ames, M., Finn, M., & Viswanathan, V. (2005). The uses of
personal networked digital imaging: An empirical study of cameraphone photos
129
and sharing. Paper presented at the CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors
in computing systems.Jörgensen, C. (1996). Indexing images: Testing an image description template. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. from
http://www.asis.org/annual-96/ElectronicProceedings/jorgensen.html
Jörgensen, C. (1998). Attributes of images in describing tasks. Inf. Process. Manage.,
34(2-3), 161-174.
Jaimes, A., & Chang, S.-F. (2000). A conceptual framework for indexing visual
information at multiple levels. Paper presented at the IS&T/SPIE Internet
Imaging. from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.37.29 Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal ofConsumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 4(1), 8-18.
Kipp, M. E. I. (2006). @toread and cool: Tagging for time, task and emotion. Paper presented at the 17th Annual SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop part of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST).
Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Rother, C., & Wood, K. (2006). Understanding photowork. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems.
Koch, T. (2006). Social tagging. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from
http://homes.ukoln.ac.uk/~tk213/pres/tagging0602.html
Komito, L. (1998). The net as a foraging society: Flexible communities. The
Information Society: An International Journal, 14(2), 97 - 106.
Kroski, E. (2005). The hive mind: Folksonomies and user-based tagging. Retrieved December 24, 2007, from
http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2005/12/07/the-hive-mind-folksonomies-and-user -based-tagging/
Lamantia, J. (2006). Tag clouds: Navigation for landscapes of meaning. Retrieved Novemeber 18, 2008, from
http://www.joelamantia.com/blog/archives/ideas/tag_clouds_navigation_for_land scapes_of_meaning.html
Lee, C. P., & Copeland, J. A. (2006). Flowtag: A collaborative attack-analysis,
130
reporting, and sharing tool for security researchers. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Visualization for computer security.Markkula, M., & Sormunen, E. (2000). End-user searching challenges indexing practices inthe digital newspaper photo archive. Inf. Retr., 1(4), 259-285.
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., & Davis, M. (2006). Ht06, tagging paper,
taxonomy, flickr, academic article, to read. Paper presented at the Proceedings of
the seventeenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia.Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies - cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. Retrieved September 13, 2008, from
http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folks onomies.html
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
Mika, P. (2007). Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics.
Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(1), 5-15.
Millen, D. R., & Feinberg, J. (2006). Using social tagging to improve social
navigation. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Social Navigation and
Community-Based Adaptation Technologies, Dublin, Ireland.Millen, D. R., Yang, M., Whittake, S., & Feinberg, J. (2007). Social bookmarking and exploratory search. In Ecscw 2007 (pp. 21-40).
Miller, A. D., & Edwards, W. K. (2007). Give and take: A study of consumer
photo-sharing culture and practice. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the
SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Negoescu, R. A., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2008). Analyzing flickr groups. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Content-based image and video retrieval.
Noll, M. G., & Meinel, C. (2008). Exploring social annotations for web document
classification. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium
on Applied computing.Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2008). What drives content tagging: The case of
photos on flickr. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual
131
SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Rainie, L. (2007). Pew internet and american life project : 28% of online americans
have used the internet to tag content: Pew Internet and American Life Projecto.
Document Number)
Rivadeneira, A. W., Gruen, D. M., Muller, M. J., & Millen, D. R. (2007). Getting our
head in the clouds: Toward evaluation studies of tagclouds. Paper presented at
the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Rodden, K., & Wood, K. R. (2003). How do people manage their digital photographs?
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Sen, S., Lam, S. K., Rashid, A. M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., et al.
(2006). Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work.
Shatford, S. L. (1986). Analyzing the subject of a picture: A theoretical approach.
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 6(3), 39 - 62.
Shatford, S. L. (1994). Some issues in the indexing of images. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.,
45(8), 583-588.
Shirky, C. (2005). Ontology is overrated: Categories, links, and tags Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html Sigurbjörnsson, B., & Zwol, R. v. (2008). Flickr tag recommendation based on
collective knowledge. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 17th international
conference on World Wide Web.Sinclair, J., & Cardew-Hall, M. (2008, February 1, 2008). The folksonomy tag cloud:
When is it useful? Journal of Information Science, 34(1), 15-29.
Sinha, R. (2005). A cognitive analysis of tagging. Retrieved December 26, 2007, from http://www.rashmisinha.com/archives/05_09/tagging-cognitive.html
Sinha, R. (2006). A social analysis of tagging. Retrieved December 26, 2007, from
http://rashmisinha.com/2006/01/18/a-social-analysis-of-tagging/
Smith, G. (2008). Tagging : People-powered metadata for the social web (1 ed.): New
132
Riders Press.
Stebbins, R. A. (2005). Project-based leisure: Theoretical neglect of a common use of free time. Leisure Studies, 24, 1-11.
Suchanek, F. M., Vojnovic, M., & Gunawardena, D. (2008). Social tags: Meaning and
suggestions. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on
Information and knowledge mining.Szekely, B., & Torres, E. (2005). Ranking bookmarks and bistros: Intelligent community and folksonomy development.
Szomszor, M. N., Cantador, I., & Alani, H. (2008). Correlating user profiles from
multiple folksonomies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM
conference on Hypertext and hypermedia.Tennis, J. T. (2006). Social tagging and the next steps for indexing Paper presented at the 17th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/2091/
Thom-Santelli, J., Muller, M. J., & Millen, D. R. (2008). Social tagging roles:
Publishers, evangelists, leaders. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the
twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Trant, J. (2009). Studying social tagging and folksonomy: A review and framework.
Journal of Digital Information, 10(1).
Vander Wal, T. (2005). Explaining and showing broad and narrow folksonomies.
Retrieved November 13, 2008, from
http://personalinfocloud.com/2005/02/explaining_and_.html
Vander Wal, T. (2006). Understanding folksonomy (tagging that works). Retrieved September 26, 2007, from
http://s3.amazonaws.com/2006presentations/dconstruct/Tagging_in_RW.pdf
Visual Resource Association [VRA] (2009). VRA Core 4.0. Retrieved May 9, 2009, from http://www.vraweb.org/projects/vracore4/index.html
Voss, J. (2006). Collaborative thesaurus tagging the wikipedia way. CoRR,
abs/cs/0604036.
Voss, J. (2007). Tagging, folksonomy & co - renaissance of manual indexing? arxiv
133
preprint, cs/0701072v2.
Yee, R. (2008). Understanding tagging and folksonomies. In Pro web 2.0 mashups (pp.
61-75).
Zollers, A. (2007, May 8-12). Emerging motivations for tagging: Expression,
performance, and activism. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 16th
International WWW Conference.134
135
□ 5.其他__________（PDA、連線遊戲機）
□ 6.不知道 e-mail：[email protected]
中華民國九十八年十月
136
137
4.
請問您的家庭狀況？□ 1.未婚 □ 2.已婚
5.
請問您的居住地區？□ 1.北部地區 □ 2.中部地區 □ 3.南部地區
□ 4.東部地區 □ 5.離島
6.
請問您的職業？□ 1.軍警/政府機關 □ 2.資訊/科技 □ 3.工商服務
□ 4.金融/保險/貿易 □ 5.房地產/建築/營造 □ 6.農林漁牧
□ 7.法律相關行業 □ 8.交通/運輸/旅遊 □ 9.傳播/公共關係
□10.藝術/設計 □11.娛樂/出版 □12.教育/研究
□13.醫療/公衛 □14.學生 □15.家管
□16.待業中 □17.其他_________
7.
月收入□1. 10000 元以下 □2. 10001 元-20000 元 □3. 20001 元-30000 元
□4. 30001 元-40000 元 □4. 40001 元-50000 元 □5. 50001 元-60000 元
□6. 60001 元-70000 元 □7. 70001 元-80000 元 □8. 80000 元以上
-問卷到此結束-
138
139
附錄二
【訪談大綱】
1. 使用網路圖像分享帄台的原因為何？過去是否使用過其他相似的帄台？
若有，這麼多類似的帄台為何會使用 flickr？flickr 與其他帄台相比的優 缺點為何？付費使用的原因為何？
2. 大多拍攝的圖像類型？儲存/保存方式？多久上傳、組織、整理？使用 flickr 所提供的哪些功能來進行組織與管理？
3. 是否會對圖像的標題、說明、備註進行修改與編輯？是/否的原因為何？
依據為何？會對上傳的圖像進行標記嗎？進行標記原因為何？
4. 標籤的內容特性：選擇標籤詞彙的依據是什麼？標籤的形式與結構？
5. 會在 flickr 上進行搜尋嗎？都搜尋了什麼？會到社群裡陎瀏覽嗎？瀏覽 的方式為何？大概都持續多久的時間？瀏覽的過程中還會進行哪些活 動（如：評論、加入我的最愛、下載）？
6. 社群與社群外的活動情形
7. 對於這些上傳的圖片通常是如何使用與再利用？使用過 flickr 提供的第 三方廠商的輸出與列印功能嗎？