第五章 結論與建議
5.3 未來研究建議
1. 由於面積大小會影響資訊量的比例，因此建議在將來研究可利用資訊量來對眼 動指標的行為做加權，例如將測量的眼動指標結果除以該 AOI 面積，或是該 AOI 中的資訊量，如重要文字的字數或重要概念的次數。
2. 本研究時將「指導語說明」放在實驗設計外，且由受測者自由閱讀未固定時間，
使得玩家開始做數獨遊戲時，眼動資料的時間難以精確切取，建議日後做眼動 實驗時，「指導語說明」的時間採固定方式，勿依照受測者進度，以便增加實 驗時對時間掌控的精確度，建議日後研究者可將「指導語說明」放入實驗設計 內。
3. 本實驗由於樣本來源的限制，樣本多元性不足，為增加精確度，建議可先讓受 測者填問卷將玩家特質做分組再取樣做實驗。實驗樣本可採分組方式進行，依 照玩家遊戲經驗如生手玩家與老手玩家觀察其眼動差異。
4. 本研究未針對玩家策略方面的分析，建議日後研究方向可進一步將「遊戲主畫 面」分成數個「興趣區域」，探討玩家遊戲過程的主要策略是否因玩家思考風 格及遊戲經驗而有所不同。由於玩家策略的分析比較複雜，建議數獨遊戲選擇 4*4 的主畫面，不但簡化分析也可進一步觀察探討玩家的主要策略及方向。
參考文獻
中文部分
吳明瑄、葉茂淳、王思懿 (2006)。如何解數獨。數學傳播，30(1)，49-60。
巫光禎 (2005 )。經典數獨直觀法解題技巧。尤怪之家。取自 http://oddest.nc.hcc.edu.tw/
孫春在.( 2013)遊戲式數位學習。台北市:高等教育。 Experimental Psychology, 103, 62-70.
Baars, B. J. (1997).Consciousness versus attention,perception,and working memory.
Consciousness and Cognition,6,363-371.
Baker, M. A., & Loeb, M.(1973). Implications of measurement of eye fixations for a psychophysics of form perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 185-192.
Becker, W., & Jttrgens, R. (1979). Analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19, 967-983.
Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153(3731), 25.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
Cherry, E.C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(5):975-979
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/
Cilliers, C. D., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Thinking styles: Implications for optimizing learning and teaching in university education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 15(1), 13–24.
Crawford, T. J. (1996). Transient motion of visual texture delays sac- cadic eye movement. Acta Psychologica, 92, 251-262.
De Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research,68,179-201.
Psychological Review,70,80-90.
Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology : theory and practice.
Duchowski, A.T. (2003) Eye tracking methodology：theory and practice.
Verlag London Limited,pp.186-187
Duchowski, A. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, 34(4), 455-470. doi: 10.3758/bf03195475
Frank,L. (1982). Play in personality development. In G.Landreth (Ed.).play therap:
Dynamics of the process of counseling with children (PP.19-32).Springfield.IL:
Charles C.Thomas.
Findlay, J. M. (1992). Programming of stimulus-elicited saccadic eye movements. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading ( pp. 8- 30 ). New York: Springer -Verlag.
G. Underwood, 2005. Cognitive Processes in Eye Guidance. Oxford Univ.Press,
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic.
Gee, James Paul. (2007) : Good video games + good learning : collected essays on video games, learning and literacy / James Paul Gee. New York : P. Lang, c2007.
Gee, J. P. (2005). Why video games are good for your soul: Pleasure and learning.
Melbourne, Australia: Common Ground.
Gee, J.P. (2004). Learning by design:Games as learning machines.Interactive Educational Mutimedia,8,15-23.
Gee, J.P. (2003) What Video games have to teach us about learning and literacy .New York:palgrave Macmillan.
Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14(5), 462-466.
Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423 (6939), 534-7. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/204540587?accountid=10074
Hansen, D. W., & Qiang, J. (2010). In the Eye of the Beholder: A Survey of Models for Eyes and Gaze. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 32(3), 478-500. doi: 10.1109/tpami. 2009.30
Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology., 50, 243-271.
Henderson, J. M., Dixon, P., Petersen, A., Twilley, L. C., & Ferreira, E ( 1995 ).
Evidence for the use of phonological representations during transsaccadic word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 82-97.
Henderson, J. M., Williams, C. C., Castelhano, M. S., & Falk, R. J. (2003). Eye
movements and picture processing during recognition. Perception & Psychophysics,
65(5), 725-734.
Heywood, S., & Churcher, J. (1980). Structure of the visual array and saccadic latency: Implications for oculomotor control. Quarterly Jour- nal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 335 -341.
Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics:
The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1215-1226
Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Macmillan.
Hutt, C. (1971). Exploration and play in children. In R.E. Herron,& B.
Sutton-Smith(Eds.), Child’s play. (pp. 231-251). New York : Wiley.
Hyona, J., Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: evidence from eye fixation patterns.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 44-55.
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading : Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40 (6), 431-439.
James, William, 1842-1910. : The principles of psychology / by William James. [New York] Dover Publications 1950.[ISBN 0486203816 (pbk.) : NT879] (#000153332) Javal, L. E. (1906). Physiologie de la lecture et de l'écriture. Paris : F.Alcan.
Johnson,S.(2005).Everything bad is good for you :How today’s popular ulture is actually making us smarter ,New York :Reverhead Books.
Johnston , W. A., & Heinz,S.P. (1978).Flexibility and capacity demands of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,107,420-435.
Kahneman, D.,& Tversky, A. (1973).On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review,80,237-251.
Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM(2000). Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed.
McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kirriemuir,J., & McFarlane,A.(2006).Literature review in games and learning.Futurelab Series : Report 8.Bristol,UK:Futurelab.
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 1000-1009.
LaBerge, D. & Samuels , S. J. (1974).Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reaching .Cognitive Bychology,6,293-323.
Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1998). Foveal processing load and landing position effects in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science.
Louwerse, M. M., Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Lu, S. (2009). Embodied conversational agents as conversational partners. Applied Cognitive Psychology,
23(9), 1244-1255.
Marc Prensky, (2001),"Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1", On the Horizon, Vol. 9 Iss: 5 pp. 1 - 6
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
McConkie, G. W., Kerr, E. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations in words. Vision Research, 28(10), 1107-1118.
Mckay,D.G.(1973).Aspects of the theory of comprehension ,memory and attention.Quarterly,22-40.
Miller,P.H., & Bigi,L. (1979).The development of children’s understanding of attention.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,25,235-250
Miller, P.H., & Weiss, M. C. (1982).Children’s and adult’s knowledge about what variable affect selective attention.Child Development,53,543-549.
Moray, N (1959). Attention in dichotic listening:Affective cues and the influence of instructions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,11,56-60 .
Neely, J.H.(1977).Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory:Role of
inhibitionless spreading of activation and capacity limitation.Journal of Experimental Psychology:general,106,226-254.
Neisser, U.1967.Cognitive Psychology.New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Nisbett, Richard, & Wilson, Timothy. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
Norman,D.A.(1968).Toward a theory of memory and attention.Psychological Review,75,522-536 .
P. Viola and M. Jones,(2001.) “Robust Real-Time Face Detection,” Proc.Int’l Conf.
Computer Vision, vol. II, p. 747, 2001.
Pollatsek, A. & Rayner, K. (1982). Eye movement control in reading: The role of word boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 8, 817-33.
Posner, M.I., & Snyder, C.R.R. (1975).Attention and cognitive control.In R.L.Solso(Ed.),Information processing and cognition:The Loyolla Symposium.Hillsdale,N.J.:Erlbaum.
Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Laarni, J., Kallinen, K., & Salminen, M. (2005, June). The
psycho-physiology of video gaming: Phasic emotional responses to game events. In Proceedings of DiGRa 2005 Conference: Changing Views-Worlds in Play,British Columbia.
Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8(1), 21-30.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin, 124(3), 372.
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38, 1129-144.
Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537-550.
Salen,K.,& Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Salvucci, D. D., & Anderson, J. R. (1998). Tracing eye movement protocols with cognitive process models. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 923-928). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). How multiple external representations are used and how they can be made more useful. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1227-1243.
Shiffrin, R.M., Craig, J.C.,& Cohen, E. (1973).On the degree of attention and capacity limitation in tactile processing.Perception and Psychophysics,13,328-336.
Shiffrin, R. M., Pisoni, D.B., &Castaneda-Mendez,K. (1974).Is attention shared between the ears?Cognitive psychology,6,190-215.
Simon,H.A. (1986).The role of attention in cognition.In.L.Friedman,K.A.Klivington,& R.
W.Peterson(Eds).The brain,cognition,and education. New York:Academic Press.
Smith,J.H. (2005).The problem of other players: In-game cooperation as collective action.
In Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference:Changing Views-Words in Play.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation.Psychological Monographs, 74 (Whole No.498)
Squire, K. (2008).Video game literacy:A literacy of expertise.In
J.Coiro,M.Knobel,C.Lankshear,& D.Leu(Eds),Handbook of research on new literacies (pp.635-670).Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, Robert J.(1995c).Styles of Thinking and Learning. Language Testing,12 (3) p265-291
Sternberg, R. J. (1995a). An Investment Approach to Creativity. In S. M. Smith ＆ T. B.
Thomas ＆ R. A. Finke (Ed.), The Creativity Cognition Approach(pp.271-302).
USA: The MIT Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Allowing for Thinking Styles. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 36-40.
Sternberg, R. J. (1993). Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test.Unpublished test.
Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Thinking Styles: Keys to Understanding Student Performance.
Phi Delta Kappan, 71(5), 366-371.
Sterberg, R. J. (1988a). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development,31,197-224
Sterberg, R. J.(1988b). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York:
Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
Sterberg, R. J(1984)Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,7,269-7316
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? The American psychologist, 52(7), 700-712.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1995b). Styles of thinking in school. European Journal of High Ability, 6(2), 1–18.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
Sternberg, Robert J.; Martin, Marie. ( 1988 ) When Teaching Thinking Does Not Work:
What Goes Wrong? Teachers College Record, 89(4) p555-578 Sum 1988.
Stroop, J.R. (1935).Studies of interferences in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology,18,643-662.
The Principles of Psychology is a monumental text in the history of psychology , written by William James and published in 1890. Publishes The Principles of Psychology with Henry Holt of Boston, twelve years after agreeing to write it.
Treisman (1960) Treisman,A.M. (1964).Verbal cues,language,and meaning in selective attention .American Journal of Psychology,77,206-219.
Treisman, A.M. (1960).Contextual cues in selective listening.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,12,242-248.
Vonk, W., Radach, R. & van Rijn, H. (2000). Eye guidance and the saliency of word beginnings in Reading Text. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5, 6-18.(Also in .J. S. Bruner,A. Jolly, & K. Sylva(Eds.),Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp.537-555).New York,NY:Basic Books.)
White, S. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 205-223.
Wolverton, G. S., & Zola, D. (1983). The temporal characteristics of visual information extraction during reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual
and language processes. Academic Press.
Yang, J., Wang, S., Chen, H.-S., & Rayner, K. (2009). The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 37(8), 1164-1176
Zhang, L. F. (2000). Relationship between Thinking Styles Inventory and Study Process Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 29,841–856.
附 錄
受試者視覺追蹤實驗同意書
親愛的同學：
誠摯邀請您參加視線追蹤實驗，此份同意書提供您本研究相關資訊，研究者將 為您詳細說明並回答問題。
一、指導教授 : 孫春在 博士 二、研 究 生： 張玉秀
三、單 位： 國立交通大學理學院碩士在職專班科技與數位學習組 四、研究說明：
本研究欲知受測者作數位遊戲時視線移動軌跡，實驗時間約為 5 分鐘
。受測者的身分資料及結果絕對保密。研究所得的總結統計可能發表於學 術論文，但必將確保個別受測者的隱私權。
您可自由決定是否參加本研究；研究過程中也可隨時撤銷同意、退出 研究，不需任何理由，且不會引起任何不愉快或對您日後課業有所影響。
感謝您熱心的參與，使本實驗得以順利進行，對此研究貢獻良多。謝謝您 的協助與合作!
如果您同意，請在空格內簽名。
--- 經由說明後本人已詳細瞭解上述研究方法，有關本研究計畫的疑問，亦獲得詳 細解釋。本人同意並自願參與本研究。
受測者簽名： 班級座號： 0 簽名日期： 年 月 日
◎填寫說明：本部份的問卷在於瞭解填答者的基本資料，請在適合您個人狀況的
□內打
，謝謝！親愛的同學，大家好!
首先謝謝您熱心協助填寫這份問卷，這份問卷是想要了解同學 A.本身的益智遊戲數獨經驗。
B.思考特質。
這份問卷將只作為學術研究用途，本研究的結果會絕對保密，您可以放心的依照 實際情況或想法填答。感謝您的撥冗配合！
敬祝
學安！
國立交通大學理學院在職專班 指 導 教 授 孫春在博士暨 研 究 生 張玉秀 敬 上
個人基本資料 日期:101 年 月 日 1. 姓名: 班級座號: 0 E- mail 2. 性別: □ （1）男 □ （2）.女
3. 科別: □ （1）文組 □ （2）理組 □ （3）商業經營科
□ （4）體育班
4. 年級: □ （1）一年級 □ （2）二年級 □ （3）三年級 5. 請問你有戴眼鏡嗎? : □（1）有 □ （2）沒有 （若沒有者，請跳答至第 7 題）
6. 請問你戴的眼鏡是屬於哪種類型? □ （1）眼鏡 □ （2）隱形眼鏡 7. 視力調查關於近視 : □（1）正常
□（2）有 左眼約 度 右眼約 度 8. 視力調查關於散光 : □（1）正常
□（2）有 左眼約 度 右眼約 度 9. 請填入統測成績 （1）國文 （2）數學 （3）計算機概論 A 部份
1. 請問，你最早經常玩電玩遊戲的階段為下列那階段？（經常玩指一週 7 小時以上）
□ （1）沒有
學前 □ （2）入學前 □ （3）幼稚園
國小 □ （4）小一 □ （5）小二 □ （6）小三
□ （7）小四 □ （8）小五 □ （9）小六 國中 □ （10）國一 □ （11）國二 □ （12）國三 高中/職 □ （13）高一 □ （14）高二 □ （15）高三
2. 請問，你高中求學階段，花在電玩遊戲的時間為每週幾小時？
□（1）0 小時 □（2）1~10 小時內 □（3）11 ~ 20 小時 □（4）21 ~ 30 小時
□（5）31 小時以上
3. 請問你很清楚益智遊戲-數獨遊戲的規則嗎？
□（1）完全清楚 □ （2）有點清楚 □ （3）不清楚
4. 請問你玩過益智遊戲-數獨遊戲嗎？（若沒有者，請跳答至 B 部份）
□ （1） 有 □ （2）沒有
5. 請問你玩過數獨遊戲是那一類？（可複選）
說明 9 * 9 是指每行每列每宮格 填 1~9 數字 6 * 6 是指每行每列每宮格 填 1~6 數字 4 * 4 是指每行每列每宮格 填 1~4 數字
□ （1）9 * 9 □（2）6 * 6 □（3）4 * 4
6. 請問你玩數獨遊戲時，不管時間多久一定會成功完成解題嗎？
□（1）100% 成功 □（2）75% 成功 □ （3）50% 成功 □ （4）25% 成功
□（4）從不成功
7. 請問你透過什麼方式玩數獨遊戲？ (可複選)
□ （1）報紙 □（2）書籍 □（3）手機 □ （4）電腦
□ （5）其他 (請說明什麼方式) 8. 請問你玩數獨遊戲時 ,畫面呈現方式為何?
□（1）只有簡單遊戲主畫面,沒有工具列 □（2）有遊戲主畫面,還有工具列等
A 部分 已完成謝謝您!
B 部份:
思考風格量表
日期：101 年 月 日 姓名： 班級座號： 0 性 別： □ 1.男 □ 2.女 作答說明：
本量表的目的在瞭解你如何以不同的策略和方法來解決問題、擬定計劃，以及做決定。
本量表的目的在瞭解你如何以不同的策略和方法來解決問題、擬定計劃，以及做決定。