第五章 結論與建議
第三節 未來研究方向
‧
Katsanos (2008)等人也指出若卻乏完善設計之資訊架構，很有可能導致各 種易用性(usability)的問題，並惡化使用者與網頁互動之經驗。因此，資訊 架構對於學習者之認知負荷影響值得深入探究。四、 新興的數位圖書館資訊架構對於學習成效影響研究
本研究以數位圖書館資訊架構的四個面向作為探討其對於支援數位學 習學習成效影響的核心，而目前新興的資訊架構模式也不斷地被提出。
Ziemba, Cornejo 與 Beck(2011)的研究指出，以知識本體論(Ontology)建置網
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
Na tiona
l Ch engchi University
82
站具有許多優點，其資源也能夠以階層關聯的方式呈現，在搜尋資源時，
也能夠依據關聯而使得搜尋更加簡單且有效率。再者，知識本體論擁有彈 性和可擴充的性質，其呈現的格式和標準能夠讓資源分享且再利用。He 與 Peng(2010) 的 研 究 也 證 實 基 於 知 識 本 體 論 所 設 計 的 數 位 圖 書 館 DiLight，非常有助於學習者在利用數位圖書館資源進行數位學習時的資訊 尋求。因此，未來研究也可針對基於知識本體論建置之數位圖書館，支援 數位學習之效益進行探討。
‧
Arko R. A., Ginger K. M., Kastens K. A. & Weatherley J.(2006). Using Annotations to Add Value to a Digital Library for Education, D-Lib Magazine, 12(5), available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may06/arko/05arko.html(accessed January 3, 2011).
Arms, W.Y., Blanchi, C. and Overly, E.A. (1997), An architecture for information in digital libraries, D-Lib Magazine . available at:
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february97/cnri/02arms1.html (accessed December 1, 2010).
Bakeman, R. (1986). Observing interaction : an introduction to sequential analysis.
Cambridge ;New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beiers, H. (2000). Information Architecture's Potential Contribution to an Asynchoronous Learning Environment. In: Proc of the International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technologies, Palmerston North, New Zealand, pages 253--254
Chen, C.M.&Chen,C.C.(2010). Problem-based learning supported by digital archives:
Case study of Taiwan Libraries’ History Digital Library. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 5-28
Chu, H. C., Hwang G. J., Huang, S. X., & Wu, T. T. （2008）. A knowledge engineering approach to developing e-libraries for mobile learning. The Electronic Library, 26(3), 303-317.
Conklin, J.(1987). Hypertext: an introduction and survey. Computer , 20, 17–41.
Dillon, A. & Turnbull, D(2010) .Information Architecture. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, Third Edition, 1(1), 2361-2368.
DLESE Teaching Box. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://www.teachingboxes.org/
Dong, A. & Agogino, A.M. (2001). Design principles for the information architecture of a SMET education digital library.1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL’01), 314-21.
Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, ASCE, 78 (7), 674–681.
Frias-Martinez, E., Chen S.Y. & Liu, X.(2007).Automatic Cognitive Style Identification of Digital Library Users for Personalization. Journal of the
‧
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 237–251.
Frias-Martinez, E., Chen, S.Y. & Liu, X.(2008). Investigation of Behavior and Perception of Digital Library Users: A Cognitive Style Perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 28(5), 355-365.
Fuchs, M., Muscogiuri, C., Niedere´e, C. & Hemmje, M. (2004). Digital libraries in knowledge management: an e-learning case study, International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4 (1), 31-5.
Gwizdka, J.& Lopatovska, I.(2009).The Role of Subjective Factors in the Information Search Process. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 60(12), 2452–2464.
He, D., & Peng, Y. （2010）. Supporting information access in e-learning by integrating digital libraries and ontology. Online Information Review, 34（5）, 704-728.
Heineman, P.L.(1995). Cognitive versus learning style. Retrieved January 8, 2011, from http://www.personality-project.org/perproj/others/heineman/cog.htm.
Katsanos, C., Tselios, N., & Avouris, N. (2008). Automated semantic elaboration of web site information architecture. Interacting with Computers, 20, 535–544.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In National association of secondary school principals (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs,. Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals. ,1-17
Kirsh D. (2000). A Few Thoughts on Cognitive Overload. Intellectica, 1(30), 19-51.
Klašnja-Milicevic, A., Vesin, B., Ivanovic, M., & Budimac, Z. (2011) E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers & Education, 56(3), 885-899
Kovel-Jarboe, P.(2001). The changing contexts of higher education and four possible futures for distance education. Issues Challenging Education, University of Minnesota, available at: http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/issues/papers/kovel.asp Kuhlthau, C.(1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's
perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 361-371.
Kuhlthau, C.(1997). Learning in digital libraries: An information search process approach. Library Trends, 45, 708-724.
Kuri, N.P., Mário, O.& Truzzi, S. (2002). Learning Styles Of Freshmen Engineering Students. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.12.8463
Lazar, J., Jones, A., and Shneiderman, B. (2006). Workplace User Frustration with
‧
Computers: An Exploratory Investigation of the Causes and Severity, Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(3), 239-251.
Lee, L.Z. (2001). Growing a national learning environment and resources network for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education: current issues and opportunities for the NSDL program. D-Lib Magazine, 7(3), 65-73.
Lynch C & Garcia-Molina H. (1995) Interoperability scaling, and the digital libraries research agenda: A report on the May 18-19, 1995, IITA Digital Libraries design andevaluation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Marchionini, G. & Maurer, H.(1995). The Roles of Digital Libraries in Teaching and Learning. Communications of the ACM, 38(4), 67-75.
Marshall, B.B., Chen, H., Shen R.& Fox E.A.(2006). Moving Digital Libraries into the Student Learning Space: The GetSmart Experience. ACM Journal on Educational resources in Computing, 6(1).
Morville, P. & Rosenfield, L.(2007). Information architecture for the World Wide Web. Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Otter, M., Johnson, H. (2000). Lost in hyperspace: metrics and mental models.
Interacting with Computers, 13 (1), 1–40.
Parandjuk, J. C.(2010). Using Information Architecture to Evaluate Digital Libraries.
The Reference Librarian, 51(2), 124 -134.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
Sharifabadi, S.R.(2006). How digital libraries can support e-learning. The Electronic Library, 24(3), 389-401.
Sumner, T. & Marlino, M. (2004). Digital libraries and educational practice: a case for new models. Fourth ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL'04) USA. 170-178
Surla, S. M.(2007). An Information Architecture Approach to Building a Much Better Digital Library. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 33(6), 41-43,from http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Aug-07/Surla.pdf Ziemba, L., Cornejo, C., & Beck, H. W. (2011). A water conservation digital library
using ontologies. The Electronic Library, 29(2), 200-211.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
Na tiona
l Ch engchi University
86
二、中文參考文獻
郭重吉（1987）。英美等國晚近對學生學習風格之研究。資優教育季刊，22，2-8。
陳志銘，陳佳琪(2008)。數位典藏支援數位學習現況與發展。臺灣圖書館管理季 刊，4(2)，9-23。
陳建勳（譯）（民96）。資訊架構學：網站應用（原作者：Rosenfield, L.& Morville, P.）。臺北市：歐萊禮。
數 位 典 藏 融 入 教 學 資 源 網 。 上 網 日 期 ： 2010 年 12 月 5 日 。 網 址 ： http://idatp.moe.edu.tw/index.aspx
鄭寶梅(2007)。國家圖書館與數位學習服務。國家圖書館館訊，96(2)，10-15。
賴苑玲(2001)。學習風格在資訊素養教學上之應用。上網日期：2010年1月8日。
網址：dspace.lib.fcu.edu.tw/bitstream/2377/4266/1/20011019_pg913.pdf 顧潔心，顧大維（2010 年 4 月）。針對不同學習風格學習者的多媒體呈現原則
歸納與分析研究。2010 電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會論文集，新 竹教育大學。
‧
‧
2. 請說明 Huon 半島(Huon Peninsula)的地理位置與其所屬的國家？並詳細解 釋島上雖發現有 2 到 5 萬年前的珊瑚礁，但為何不是古氣候研究的良好記錄？