第五章 結論
第三節 研究限制與建議
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
是一個很懶惰的男生…我做任何事情沒有想什麼，就是我現在想做這個我就做這 個，我沒有想說我要幹嘛。」除此之外，這也很有可能是本研究較缺乏性感形象 受訪者的緣故，研究者在進行邀約時，即明確指出本研究以性別為研究焦點，而 那些實況主很可能預設之後需要花大把精力維護自身性展演的正當性，也因此卻 步選擇不接受訪談邀約。
第三節 研究限制與建議
延伸研究反思，也構成本研究的限制，研究者未能邀約到更多以性感形象為 主的女實況主，無從理解她們的動機、選擇與協商的方式以及心路歷程，也因此 對於Twitch上性主體協商的整體樣貌缺少了一塊。對此，研究者建議後續可以採 取兩種方向進行研究。其一是個案研究，透過長時間觀察、以及與單一研究對象 建立相互信任的關係，或可協助憂慮被負面評價的實況主卸下心防，挖掘出更具 意義的資料和動態協商歷程。其二，研究者認為後續也可以研究跨平台的性主體 協商，這個想法來自於，研究者觀察到拒斥陰柔操演的E在另一社群平台──
Instagram會穿著泳衣、小露身材，這是否是如同C在訪談中不小心透露的：照片 比動態影像更能確認自己的外貌是好看的這樣類似的動機呢？抑或是有其他原 因？藉由探討不同平台對實況主的挪用意義與方式，或可進一步了解在這個多平 台展演的時代，女性是如何在不同脈絡中進行性別協商。
‧
nsRcJsqsFFVYnuHiCsd2xEjV3OnTTAHsxitelRr2YIl657Eu8AIyawF5FV1czXl〈Google 首度遊戲大調查：台灣女性玩家多、全台每天玩掉 3,000 年！〉（2015 年 7 月 27 日）。取自 INSIDE 網頁
https://www.inside.com.tw/2015/07/27/google-says-people-in-taiwan-play-game s-for-3000-years-each-day
〈這麼可愛一定是男孩子〉（無日期）。取自萌娘百科網頁
https://zh.moegirl.org/zh-tw/%E8%BF%99%E4%B9%88%E5%8F%AF%E7%88%B 1%E4%B8%80%E5%AE%9A%E6%98%AF%E7%94%B7%E5%AD%A9%E5%AD%90 Techris（2018 年 7 月 5 日）。〈電玩實況主怎麼賺？Twitch 公式大解密！〉。取自
EXP.GG 網頁
https://exp.gg/zh_tw/exp%E5%8E%9F%E5%89%B5%E5%B0%88%E5%8D%8 0-zh_tw/50182
林文琪譯（2004）。《身體認同：同一與差異》。台北縣永和市：韋伯文化國際。（原 書 Woodward, K. (Ed). [1997]. Identity and Difference. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage in association with the Open University.）
林宇玲（2011）。〈線上遊戲與性別建構〉，《新聞學研究》，108: 51-58。
張玉佩、呂育瑋（2006）。〈網路促進女性解放之可能？從線上遊戲談起〉，《中華 傳播學刊》，9: 113-150。
張君玫（2018 年 5 月 1 日）。〈書寫身體與結構：給我共生演化的同伴〉。取自巷 仔口社會學網頁https://twstreetcorner.org/2018/05/01/chuangchunmei-2/
黃守義、許詩嫻、國立編譯館譯（2008）。《新媒介科技手冊》。台北縣永和市：
韋伯文化國際。（原書 Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (Eds). [2006].
Handbook of new media : social shaping and social consequences of ICTs.
London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.）
潘淑滿（2003）。《質性研究：理論與應用》。台北市：心理。
‧
Allen, J. (1999.3.26). ‘Ed’ of the Internet: JenniCAM going strong after three years.
Retrieved from CNN.com.
http://edition.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/Movies/9903/26/jennicam/?fbclid=IwAR09T Wu_ce3M3j3WjNMC1WJBBEpD8X5iBHYZrcahpqQr9e7vZBSvJo0cyfk Archer, J., & Lloyd, B. B. (2002). Sex and Gender. Cambridge, U.K.; New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Attwood, F. (2011). Through the looking glass? Sexual agency and subjectification online. In R. Gill, C. Scharff (Eds.), New Femininities: Postfeminism,
Neoliberalism and Subjectivity (pp.203-214). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bryce, J., & Rutter, J. (2002). Killing like a girl: Gendered gaming and girl gamers’
visibility. In F. Mäyrä (Ed.), Computer games and digital culture conferences (pp.243-255). Tampere, FIN: University of Tampere Press.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York:
Routledge.
Cassell, J., & Jenkins, H. (Eds.). (1998). From Barbie to mortal kombat: Gender and computer games. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Connell, R. W. (1983). Which way is up?. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Connell, R., & Pearse, R. (2015). Gender: In world perspective. Cambridge, UK:
Polity.
Cote, A. C. (2017). “I can defend myself”: Women’s strategies for coping with harassment while gaming. Games and Culture, 12(2), 136-155.
Daviault, C., & Schott, G. (2015). Looking beyond representation: Situating the significance of gender portrayal within game play. In C. Carter, L. Steiner, & L.
Mclaughlin (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media and gender (pp.440-449).
London: Routledge.
Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. (n.d.). Retrieved from entainterment software association
https://www.theesa.com/esa-research/2019-essential-facts-about-the-computer-an d-video-game-industry/
Evans, A., Riley, S., & Shankar, A. (2010). Technologies of sexiness: Theorizing women's engagement in the sexualization of culture. Feminism & Psychology, 20(1), 114-131.
Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality: An introduction. London: Allen Lane.
‧
Fox, J., & Tan, W. Y. (2014). Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation. Computers in Human
Behavior, 33, 314-320.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on sexuality. The Pelican Freud Library, Vol. 7, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA:
Houghton Mifflin Company.
Gill, R. (2012). Media, Empowerment and the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ Debates. Sex Roles, 66, 736-745.
Hariman, R. (2008). Political parody and public culture. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 94(3), 247-272.
Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2006). Gender and computer games: Exploring females’
dislikes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 910-931.
Hayes, E. (2007). Gendered identities at play: Case studies of two women playing Morrowind. Games and Cultures, 2(1), 23-48.
Jansz, J., & Martis, R. G. (2007). The Lara phenomenon: Powerful female characters in video games. Sex Roles, 56(3-4), 141-148.
Jimroglou, K. M. (1999). A CAMERA WITH A VIEW JenniCAM, visual
representation, and cyborg subjectivity. Information, Communication & Society, 2(4), 439-453.
Juul, J. (2009). A casual revolution: Reinventing video games and their players.
Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kenny, K. (2009). “The performative surprise”: parody, documentary and critique.
Culture and Organization, 15(2), 221-235.
Lamb, S. (2010). Porn as a Pathway to Empowerment? A Response to Peterson’s Commentary. Sex Roles, 62, 314-317.
Lin, H. (2008). Body, space and gendered gaming experiences: A cultural geography of homes, cybercafés and dormitories. In Y. B. Kafai, C. Heeter, J. Denner, & J. Y.
Sun (Eds.), Beyond barbie and mortal kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming (pp.67-82). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Maddox, B. (1977). Women and the switchboard. In I. de Sola Pool (Ed.), The social impact of the telephone (pp.262-280). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18.
Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power. New York: Vintage Books.
Paaßen, B., Morgenroth, T., & Stratemeyer, M. (2017). What is a true gamer? The male gamer stereotype and the marginalization of women in video game culture.
‧
Sex Roles, 76, 421-435.
Pelletier, C. (2008). Gaming in context: How young people construct their gendered identities in playing and making games. In Y. B. Kafai, C. Heeter, J. Denner, & J.
Y. Sun (Eds.), Beyond barbie and mortal kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming (pp.145-160). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Peterson, Z. D. (2010). What Is Sexual Empowerment? A Multidimensional and Process-Oriented Approach to Adolescent Girls’ Sexual Empowerment. Sex Roles, 62, 307-313.
Rakow, L. F. (1988). Gendered technology, gendered practice. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5(1), 57-70.
Ratan, R. A., Taylor, N., Hogan, J., Kennedy, T., & Williams, D. (2015). Games and Culture, 10(5), 438-462.
Ringrose, J. (2011). Are you sexy, flirty, or a slut? Exploring 'sexualization'and how teen girls perform/negotiate digital sexual identity on social networking sites. In R. Gill, & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities : postfeminism, neoliberalism, and subjectivity (pp.99-116). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and 'sexting': Gendered value in digital image exchange.
Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305-323.
Royse, P., Lee, J., Undrahbuyan, B., Hopson, M., & Consalvo, M. (2007). Women and games: Technologies of the gendered self. New Media & Society, 9(4), 555-576.
Shaw, A. (2011). Do you identify as a gamer? Gender, race, sexuality, and gamer identity. New Media & Society, 14(1), 28-44.
Silverstone, R., Morley, D., Dahlberg, A., & Livingstone, S. (1989). Families, technologies and consumption: the household and information and
communication technologies. Uxbridge: Centre for Research into Innovation, Culture & Technology, Brunel University.
Simpson, P. (2003). On the Discourse of Satire: Towards a Stylistic Model of
Satirical Humour. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Stafford-Fraser, Q. (1995.5). The Trojan Room Coffee Pot: A (non-technical) biography. Retrieved from https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/coffee/qsf/coffee.html Summers, A., & Miller, M. K. (2014). From damsels in distress to sexy superheros:
How the portrayal of sexism in video game magazines has changed in the last twenty years. Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 1028-1040.
Taylor, N., Jenson, J., & de Castell, S. (2009). Cheer leaders/booth babes/Halo hoes:
pro-gaming, gender and jobs for the boys. Digital Creativity, 20(4), 239-252.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Taylor, T. L. (2006). Play between worlds: Exploring online game cultures.
Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Thornham, H. (2011). Ethnographies of the videogame: Gender, narrative and praxis.
Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York:
Simon & Schuster.
Walkerdine, V. (2007). Children, gender, video games: Towards a relational approach to multimedia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125-151.
White, M. (2003). Too close to see: men, women, and webcams. New Media &
Society, 5(1), 7-28.
Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496-502.
Williams, D., Consalvo, M., Caplan, S., & Yee, N. (2009). Looking for gender:
Gender roles and behaviors among online gamers. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 700-725.
Zhang, G., & Hjorth, L. (2017). Live-streaming, games and politics of gender performances: the case of nüzhubo in China. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 1-19.