第五章 結論與建議
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
52
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議
一、研究限制
由於本研究問卷設計中對於防禦型印象管理戰術的探討乃採用模擬情境的 方式進行，且問卷中情境設計皆統一為應徵者面臨面試官質疑其在校成績的表現，
而該情境設計屬於應徵者能力層面的質疑，但在實際的求職面談中，應徵者受到 的質疑不一定僅來自能力層面，可能是個性、臨場表現或是道德方面的質疑，本 研究為求統一情境設計，在此部分可能稍損真實性，無法涵蓋可能的層面。
二、未來研究建議
本研究中僅探討自我監控特質對防禦型印象管理戰術選擇的影響，Gardner 與 Martinko(1988)曾提出四個影響個體使用印象管理戰術的人格特質，分別是自 我監控能力、馬基維利主義、社會認可需要(needs for approval)與社會焦慮(social anxiety)，建議後續研究能將其他人格特質納入探討，驗證其他的人格特質對防 禦型印象管理戰術的選擇影響為何。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
53
參考文獻
一、中文部分
1. 俞如，不怕你來問，就怕你不問，就業情報雜誌 295 期。取自就業情報網，
網址：http://media.career.com.tw/Careerbook/magshort.asp?CA_NO=295p016 2. 李佩芬，尖銳面試問題 如何回答才得體？就業情報雜誌 336 期。取自就業情
報網，網址：http://media.career.com.tw/treasury/treasury_main.asp?no=336p09 0&no2=53
3. 林能白、邱宏昌(1999)，服務品質之研究─服務人員人格特質之影響分析與應 用，管理學報，16(2)，175-200。
4. 黃靖雅(2003)，職業傾向與五大人格特質量表之甄選效度驗證與比較─以某電子 公司為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
5. 楊育豪(2011)，面試官特質對於應徵者防禦型印象管理策略選擇之影響，東海 大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
6. 吳明隆(2006)，SPSS 統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計，台北：知城數 位科技。
7. 吳祉芸(2008)，甄選面談中應徵者防禦型印象管理策略及效果之研究，國立政 治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
8. 王石番(1989)，傳播內容分析法，台北：幼獅。
二、英文部分
1. Anderson, L.R. (1990). Toward a two-track model of leadership training:
Suggestions from self-monitoring theory. Small Group Research, 21, 147-167.
2. Ashford, S.J., & Northcraft, G.B. (1992). Conveying more or less than we realize:
The role of impression-management in feedback seeking. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, 53, 310-334.
3. Bozeman, D.P., & Kacmar, K.M. (1997). Cybernetic model of impression
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
54
management processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 69, 9-30.
4. Braaten, D.O., Cody, M.J., & DeTienne, K.B. (1993). Account episodes in organizations: Remedial work and impression management. Management
Communication Quarterly, 6, 219-250.
5. Briggs, S.R., & Cheek, J.M. (1980). On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 678-686.
6. Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Caldwell, D.F., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1982). Responses to failure: The effect of choice and responsibility on impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 121-136.
8. Cuieford, J.P. (1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (4th ED.).
NY: McGraw-Hill.
9. Cupach, W.R., Metts, S., & Hazelton, Jr., V. (1986). Coping with embarrassing predicaments: Remedial strategies and their perceived utility. Journal of Language
and Social Psychology, 5, 181-200.
10. Dipboye, R.L. (1992). Selection interviews: Process perspectives. Cincinnati, OH:
South-Western.
11. Ellis, A.P.J., West, B.J., Ryan, A.M., & DeShon, R.P. (2002). The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type? Journal
of Applied Psychology, 87, 1200-1208.
12. Fandt, P.M., & Ferris, G.R. (1990). The management of information and
impressions: When employees behave opportunistically. Organizational Behavior
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
55
and Human Decision Processes, 45, 140-158.
13. Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd Ed.) NY: McGraw-Hill.
Forgas, J.P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The Affect infusion model (AIM).
14. Fukumo, M., & Ohbuchi, K. (1998). How effective are different accounts of harm- doing in softening victims’ reactions? A scenario investigation of the effects of severity, relationship, and culture. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 167-178.
15. Gabrenya, W.K., & Arkin, R.M. (1980). Factor structure and factor correlates of the self- monitoring scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 13-22.
16. Gardner, W.L. & Martinko, M.J. (1988). Impression Management in Organizations.
Journal of Management, 14(2), 321-338.
17. Giacalone, R.A., & Rosenfeld, P. (Ed.) (1989). Impression management in
organization. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Giacalone, R.A., & Rosenfeld, P. (Eds) (1991). Applied impression management:
How image-making affects managerial decisions. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage
Publications.
19. Goei, R., Roberto, A., Mayer, G., & Carlyle, K. (2007). The effects of favor and apology on compliance. Communication Research, 34, 575-595.
20. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY:
Doubleday Anchor.
21. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. NY: Harper & Row.
22. Gonzales, M.H. (1992) A thousand pardons: The effectiveness of verbal remedial tactics during account episodes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 133-151.
23. Gonzales, M.H., Pederson, J.H., Manning, D.J., & Wetter, D.W. (1990). Pardon my gaffe: Effects of sex, status, and consequence severity on accounts. Journal of
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
56
Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 610-621.
24. Gordon, R.A., Rozelle, R.M., & Baxter, J.C. (1988). The effect of applicant age, job level, and accountability on the evaluation of job applicants. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 20-33.
25. Hitt, M.A., & Barr, S.H. (1989). Managerial selection decision models: Examination of configural cue processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 53-61.
26. Hofstede, G. (1990). Managerial Culture and work-related values in India.
Organization Studies, 11, 106-106.
27. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. NY: Holt.
28. Johnson, J.A. (n.d.) (2008). IPIP-NEO narrative report, available at:
www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP
29. Jones, E.E., & Pittman, T.S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-
presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self(Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 231-262.
30. Jones, E.E., & Wortman, C.B. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach.
Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.
31. Judge, T.A. &Bretz, R.D. (1994). Political influence behavior and career sucess.
Journal of Management, 20, 43-65.
32. Kilduff, M., & Day, D.D. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effect of self- monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1047-1060.
33. Kroeber, A.L., & Klunkhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and
definitions. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
34. Leary, M.R., & Kowalski, R.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 34-47.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
57
35. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
36. McCullough, M.E., Worthington, E.L., & Rachal, K.C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 73, 321-336.
37. McLaughlin, M.L., Cody, M.J., & Rosenstein, N.E. (1983). Account sequences in conversation between strangers. Communication Monographs, 50, 102-125.
38. Migliore, L.A. (2011). Relation between big five personality traits and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 38-54.
39. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 56, 219-227.
41. Pandey, J. (1986). Sociological perspectives on ingratiation. Progress in
Experimental Personality Research, 14, 205-29.
42. Peeters, H., & Lievens, F. (2006). Verbal and Nonverbal Impression Management Tactics in Behavior Description and Situational Interviews. International Journal of
Selection and Assessment, 14, 206-222.
43. Pulakos, E.D., & Schmitt, N. (1995). Experience-based and situational interview questions: Studies of validity. Personnel Psychology, 48, 289-308.
44. Robbins, S.P. (1994). Essentials of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
45. Roberts, L.M. (2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 30, 685-711.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
58
46. Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R.A., & Riordan, C.A. (1994). Impression management theory and diversity: Lessons for organizational behavior. American Behavioral
Scientist, 37, 601-604.
47. Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R.A., & Riordan, C.A. (1995). Impression management in
Organizations: Theory, measurement, practice. NY: Routledge.
48. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379-399.
49. Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity,
and interpersonal relations. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
50. Schlenker, B.R., & Darby, B.W. (1981). The use of apologies in social predicaments.
Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 271-278.
51. Schneider, D.J. (1981). Tactical self-presentations: Toward a broader conception.
In J.T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological
research (pp.23-40) NY: Academic Press.
52. Schonbach, P. (1990). Account episodes: The management or escalation of conflict.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Schonbach, P., & Kleibaumhuter, P. (1990). Severity of reproach and defensiveness of accounts. In M.J. Cody & M.L. McLaughlin (Eds), The Psychology of tactical
communication. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd, 229-243.
54. Scott, M.B., & Lyman, S.M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.
55. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
56. Snyder, M., & Gangstad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
59
125-139.
57. Stevens, C.K., & Kristof, A.L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 80, 587-606.
58. Takaku, S. (2000). Culture and status as influences on account giving: A comparison between the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 371-383.
59. TaTa, J. (2002). The influence of accounts on perceived social loafing in work teams.
The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13. 292-308.
60. Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., Bonoma, T. V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist, 26, 685-695.
61. Tedeschi, J.T., & Melburg, B. (1984). Impression management and influence in the organization. In S.B. Bacharach & E.J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of
Organizations, 3, 31-58. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
62. Tedeschi, J.T., & Reiss, M. (1981). Verbal strategies in impression management. In C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behavior
(pp.271-309), London: Academic Press.
63. Tsai, W.C., Chen, C.C., & Chiu, S.F. (2005). Exploring boundaries of the effects of applicant impression management tactics in job interviews. Journal of Management, 31, 108-132.
64. Tsai, W.C., Huang, T.C., Wu, C.Y., & Lo, I.H. (2010). Disentangling the effects of applicant defensive impression management tactics in job interviews. International
Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(2), 131-140.
65. Turnley, W.H., & Bolino, M.C. (2001). Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
60
Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 351-360.
66. Van Iddekinge, C.H., McFarland, L.A., & Raymark,P.H. (2007). Antecedents of impression management use and effectiveness in a structured interview. Journal of
Management, 33, 752-773.
67. Wayne, S.J. and Ferris, G.R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: a laboratory experiment and field study.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-99.
68. Wayne, S.J. and Green, S.A. (1993). The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human Relations, 46, 1431-1440.
69. Wayne, S.J., & Liden, R.C. (1995). Effects of impression management on
performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 232-260.
70. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
71. Williams, R. (1993). Culture is ordinary. In A. Gray & J. McGuigan(Ed.), Studying
culture: An introductory reader (pp.5-14). London: Edward Arnold.
72. Zaccaro, S.J., Foti, R.J., & Kenny, D.A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait based variance in leadership: Situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
61
附錄一 問卷英文版
Dear readers,
I am a graduate school student of National ChengChi University. Now, I’m under the instruction of Prof. Wei-Chi Tsai, studying about the topic of recruiting interviews.
In order to show the real situations, we’ll know more about behaviors of candidates if with your help. This questionnaire includes four parts and only be used in this study.
Sincerely,
Prof. Wei-Chi Tsai
Student Chia-Ying Cheng
Part 1: Situation
Now you participate in a job interview for a marketing specialist. The interviewer finds out you have once failed “marketing management.” (If you have never failed this subject, try to imagine you did or had a bad mark of some courses which was highly related to this vacancy.) And due to the high relatedness between this course and required knowledge of this vacancy, the interviewer indicates that it may negative influence your interview evaluation and asks you for an explanation. In this concern, what is your response?
Part2:
The statements below concern your personal reactions to a number of situations.
No two statements are exactly alike, so consider each statement carefully before answering. If a statement is true or mostly true as applied to you, mark T as your answer. If a statement is false or not usually true as applied to you, mark F as your answer. It is important that you answer as frankly and as honestly as you can.
‧
other will like.3. I can only argue for ideas I already believe.
4. I can make impromptu speeches even on topics about which I have almost no information.
5. I guess I put on a show to impress or entertain people.
6. I would probably make a good actor.
7. In a group of people I am rarely the center of attention.
8. In a different situation and with different people, I often act like very different persons.
9. I am not only particularly good at making other people like me.
10. I’m not always the person I appear to be.
11. I would not change my opinions (or the way I do things) in order to please someone else or with their favor.
12. I have considered being an entertainer.
Please use the following list of common human traits to describe yourself as accurately as possible. Describe yourself as you see yourself at the present time, not as you wish to be in the future. Describe yourself as you are generally or typically, as compared with other persons you know of the same sex and of roughly your same age. For each trait, please write a number indicating how accurately that trait describes you, using the following rating scale:
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
63
Inaccurate Accurate
Extremely Very Moderately Slightly Slightly Moderately Very Extremely
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Bashful Energetic Moody Systematic Bold Envious Organized Talkative Careless Extraverted Philosophical Temperamental Cold Fretful Practical Touchy
Complex Harsh Quiet Uncreative Cooperative Imaginative Relaxed Unenvious Creative Inefficient Rude Unintellectual Deep Intellectual Shy Unsympathetic Disorganized Jealous Sloppy Warm
Efficient kind Sympathetic Withdraw
Part4:
1. Gender □ male □female 2. Age 3. Major 4. Nationality
5. Have you ever been trained for job interviews? □yes □no 6. Are you going to search for jobs during this year? □yes □no
---The End--- Thank you for your time.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
64
附錄二 問卷中文版
您好：
非常感謝您撥空填寫本問卷，本研究目的在探討應徵者其人格特質於求職面談中 偏好的防禦性印象管理策略間之關聯性，本問卷純供學術研究之用，您的熱心參 與及仔細填答將對本研究有相當貢獻，謝謝您的幫忙！
敬 祝 事事順心
國立政治大學 企業管理研究所 指導教授：蔡維奇 教授
研究生：鄭嘉瑩 敬上
第一部分：
[情境題]
求職面談中，你/妳要應徵行銷專員一職；面試官發現你/妳的必修「行銷管理」
曾經當掉重修，如果面試官表示這件事會影響他對你/妳個人適任性的評估，因 為此科目對於該職缺所需要之專業知識有高度相關性，並提供你/妳對該事件一 個解釋的機會，請問你/妳會如何回應？請簡單寫出你/妳的回應內容。
第二部分：
請就以下各題項之敘述判斷與自身行為之相符程度，若題目敘述與本身行為相同 或是極為相似，請於該題項前標示””；若題目敘述與本身行為不相同或是大 致上不符，請於該題項前標示”X”。其答案無所謂對或錯，請您依照您真實描 述作答，方能提供準確性數據於本研究。
1. 我模仿他人的行為是件困難的事。
2. 在社交場合中，我不會嘗試去做或是說些討人歡心的事。
3. 我只能和他人討論自己確信的想法。
4. 就算手邊幾乎沒有資料，我還是能就主題進行即興演說。
5. 我善於取悅娛樂他人，以使他人對我留下深刻印象。