Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate (1) prisoners? satisfaction of health care quality provided by different correctional institutes and (2) the influenced factors associated with their satisfaction. Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) was employed to investigate the health care services which needed to be
improved urgently by correctional institutes.
The study populations were the prisoners in nationwide correctional institutions in Taiwan. Correctional institutions were separated into five levels according to the types of health care services, scopes and regional distributions. Nine correctional institutions were selected using stratified random sampling method. A total of 1893 prisoners were included as the studied samples in this study. Among the six characteristics of health care services, ?accessibility,? ?comprehensiveness,? ? appropriateness,? and ?continuity? serviced were treated as the dimensions to evaluate health care quality.
The descriptive statistics showed the prisoners? characteristics; bivariate analysis explored the differences between prisoners? satisfaction of different health care services and the percepts of their importance; linear multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the factors associated with the prisoners? satisfaction of different types of health care services; finally, IPA was employed to find out the health care services which needed to be improved urgently.
The results showed that the prisoners from different scopes of correctional
institutions were significantly different in terms of the health care satisfaction and the percepts of their importance. Regression analysis indicated that the following factors had great impacts on prisoners? satisfaction, such as (1) prisoners?
personal characteristics (age and education level), (2) health status (major/injured illness and chronics disease), (3) experiences of health care services (monthly expenditures of medication and monthly out-of-pocket fees for health care services), and (4) different health care services. In the light of difference types of health care services, the affiliation of hospitals had the greatest impact and followed by the percentage of out-of-pocket fees for health care services. In addition, the results of IPA analysis indicated that the top three health care services that the prisoners most satisfied with were ?environmental hygiene,? ? attitude/courtesy of hospital staffs,? and ?attitude of physician? consolations.?
With respect to the percept of the importance of health care services, ?the effect of medication,? ?disease explanation,? and ?the continuous trace of health care services provided by the correctional institutions? were prisoners? primary
concerns. Subjects also reported that the health care services which needed to be
improved urgently were ?the Abstract
Gap analysis developed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (PZB), followed by a SERVQUAL scale assessment is commonly used to quantify the functional quality of various health care service departments, however, few studies have
investigated the service quality of inpatient cancer patients. In this study, we applied gap analysis and assessment by the SERVQUAL scale to investigate the service quality of inpatient cancer patients being cared for by physicians and nurses. In addition, the assessment was analyzed by Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) and customer orientation was measured.
Expectations and perceptions of service quality of 52 physicians and 96 nurses caring for inpatient cancer patients and those of 182 inpatient cancer patients were assessed by a 21-item SERVQUAL instrument of PZB. We found that both physicians and nurses underestimate patient expectations (gap 1). Differences in gap scores between physician perceptions and patient expectations in all five dimensions of quality (tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy) were statistically significant (P<0.05). Additionally, with the exception of tangibles, differences in gap scores between nurse perceptions and patient expectations in the five dimensions of quality were statistically significant (P<0.05).
We found that the expectations of inpatient cancer patients were higher than their perceptions in all five dimensions of quality (gap 5); those differences between expectations and perceptions were statistically significant (P<0.05). Furthermore, the differences in expectations and perceptions in all 21-items except ?physician- and-nurse appear neat? of the tangibles were statistically significant (P<0.05).
According to multiple regression analysis, both education level (Master degree and Ph.D. degree) (P=0.043) and the measure of customer orientation of
physicians (P<0.001) had a different effect on gap 1; in addition, only measures of customer orientation of nurses had a different effect on gap 1 (P<0.001). Finally, gender, age, commercial medical insurance coverage, duration of disease, and sites of cancer had a different effect on gap 5.
IPA revealed that the priority of patient satisfaction and patient assessment of importance in service quality were concordant; the same result was found between physician satisfaction and physician assessment of importance. The dimension of ?reliability? was ranked no. 1 by both patients and physicians in their satisfaction and assessment of importance. In addition, patients regarded no dimension of quality as being ?concentrate here? or ?possible overkill?; the dimensions of ?reliability?, ?responsiveness? and ?assurance? fell in ?keep up the good work?; and the dimensions of ?tangibles? and ?empathy? fell in ?low
priority?. IPA of physicians revealed that ?responsiveness? fell in ?concentrate here?; whereas ?reliability? and ?assurance? fell in ?keep up the good work?. ? Tangibles? and ?empathy? were given in ?low priority?. The dimension of ?
reliability? was ranked no. 1 in the assessment of importance of nurses; however, the dimension of ?assurance? was ranked no.1 in their satisfaction. IPA of nurses revealed that ?responsiveness? fell in ?concentrate here?, ?reliability? fell in ?keep up the good work?, ?tangibles? were ?low priority?, and ?assurance? and ?
empathy? fell in ?possible overkill?.
Analysis of customer orientation showed that physicians regard ?close attention is given to after-sales service in our hospital? as the highest measure; however, the analysis revealed that nurses regard ?our hospital?s competitive strategy is based on a thorough understanding of our patients? needs? as the highest measure.
Physicians had higher mean scores than nurses in all 6-items of the customer orientation analysis; however only the item ?close attention is given to after-sales service in our hospital? differed significantly between physicians and nurses (P<0.05).
?Patient-focused? care is the mainstream of the health care system. It is
mandatory to strengthen closer communication between patients and caregivers, such as physicians and nurses. Caregivers should understand patients?
perceptions and provide whole person understanding. Furthermore, physicians with higher education levels should provide better quality care for cancer patients based upon the best available evidence. It is important that the concept of customer orientation should be implanted in the minds of both physicians and nurses.
