-
-
-
Principal Indicators Per-capita Spending by Category MOP
Current Same Quarter Year-on-year Food &
Quarter Last Year Change (%) Beverage
Total Spending of Visitors (Million MOP) 15,948 14,479 10.1 Visitors 1,056 510 371 136
Overnight Visitors 13,173 12,155 8.4 Overnight Visitors 1,713 1,099 680 199
Same-day Visitors 2,775 2,324 19.4 Same-day Visitors 487 .. 104 83
Per-capita Spending of Visitors (MOP) 2,074 2,046 1.4 .. Not Applicable
Overnight Visitors 3,691 3,574 3.3
Same-day Visitors 673 632 6.5
MOP
www.dsec.gov.mo 2014.05
·
·
·
Total spending (excluding gaming expenses) of visitors amounted to MOP15.9 billion, up by 10% year-on-year. Spending of overnight visitors totalled MOP13.2 billion, and that of same-day visitors was MOP2.8 billion.
Per-capita spending of visitors was MOP2,074, up slightly by 1% year-on-year; per-capita spending of overnight visitors was MOP3,691, and that of same-day visitors was MOP673.
Structure of Shopping Spending Per-capita Spending of Visitors by Place of Residence
Visitors spent mainly on Shopping (51%), Accommodation (25%) and Food & Beverage (18%).
Shopping Accommodation Others
About 61% of the visitors came to Macao mainly for vacation, and 19% for transit.
Main Purpose of Visit
Visitors from Australia had relatively high per-capita spending among the long-haul visitors, at MOP1,441; meanwhile, per-capita spending of visitors from the United Kingdom rose significantly by 26%, at MOP1,231.
Spending of Visitors and Purpose of Visit
·
·
Per-capita spending of overnight and same-day Mainland visitors topped at MOP4,537 and MOP818 respectively, of which shopping spending of overnight visitors accounted for 53% and that of same- day visitors was 83%.
Per-capita spending of Mainland visitors was MOP2,534, down by 4% year-on-year, and spending of those travelling under the Individual Visit Scheme (IVS) decreased notably by 11%, at MOP2,660.
Per-capita spending of visitors from Singapore increased by 9%
year-on-year, at MOP1,836. Visitors from Taiwan spent an average of MOP1,688, up by 15% year-on-year.
Alameda Dr. Carlos d' Assumpção No. 411-417, Dynasty Plaza, 17th floor, Macao Tel: (853) 8399 5311 Fax: (853) 2830 7825 E-mail: [email protected] Official Statistics. Reproduction of these data is allowed provided the source is quoted.
Government of Macao Special Administrative Region Statistics and Census Service
VISITOR EXPENDITURE SURVEY
1
STQUARTER / 2014
2,534 883
1,688 1,701 1,745
1,836 1,337
1,376 1,231
1,441
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000
Mainland China Hong Kong Taiwan Japan Malaysia Singapore Thailand U.S.A.
United Kingdom Australia
Clothing 15%
Jewellery &
Watches 27%
Local Food Products Cosmetics & 21%
Perfume 11%
Shoes, Handbags &
Wallets 16%
Others 10%
Gaming 7%
Others 1%
Vacation 61%
Visiting Relatives &
Friends 7%
Business &
Professional 5%
Transit 19%
Visitors’ Comments % No Comment
Environmental Hygiene 76 19 3 2
Public Facilities 73 17 4 6
Travel Agencies 81 16 1 2
Hotels 88 10 2 0#
Gaming Establishments 82 14 1 3
Restaurants 77 19 3 1
Shops 81 14 3 2
Public Transport 72 15 12 1
0# Magnitude less than half of the unit employed
Sampling Error MOP
Per-capita Spending
Visitors 1.8 1.5 0.5 0.3
· Overnight Visitors 3.6 3.1 0.9 0.6
Same-day Visitors 0.7 0.7 .. 0.1
.. Not Applicable
Historical Data for 1st Quarter
2011 2012 2013
Total Spending (Million MOP) 9,751 13,131 14,479
Per-capita Spending (MOP) 1,516 1,891 2,046
For additional information:
http://www.dsec.gov.mo/e/visitor_expenditure.aspx
2︱
Visitor Expenditure Survey
1ST Quarter / 2014About 88% of the visitor-users were satisfied with the hotels in Macao, and 82% complimented about the services and facilities of gaming establishments.
Improvement Needed Satisfied Fair
Visitors’ Comments
Visitors' Comments on Points of Tourist Attractions
About 38% of the visitors commented that there were sufficient points of tourist attractions, while 11% considered them insufficient; meanwhile, 12% of the visitors suggested that public transport services should be improved.
Accommodation Food &
Beverage Shopping
·
Sufficient 38%
Fair 24%
Insufficient 11%
No Comment 27%
