第七章 成果與績效
7.2 年度效益
(1) 學術成就
本子計畫主要整合設施主管機關與學術研究之成果,予以加值應用於 防災管理:並支持中央災害應變中心情資研判組之運作需求,屬任務 導向計畫工作,為科技應用性質。
建立我國 CI 相依性分析模式方法,並利用考量衝擊鏈與脆弱度分析進 行操作,確認模式篩選關鍵 CI 之可行性、及面對危害威脅時之系統行 為之模擬可操作性,該成果可提供後續部會業管單位執行相關關鍵基 礎設施防護相關作業參考。
(2) 技術創新
開發 CI 失效災害衝擊評估及指標方法,以供各項設施進行失效災害衝 擊評估之遵循依據。
開發兩種基礎設施相依性分析方法:質化與量化方法,質化方法採用 主被動比乘積作為關鍵設施元件的選定依據,屬簡易型方法,適用於 找出系統中的關鍵項目;量化方法採用停止運作水準的投入產出模型,
適用於跨部門系統的評估,可以提供設施受衝擊後系統內各設施項目 的停止運作水準,平時建立系統關聯矩陣作為防護強化的依據,應變 時提供系統受衝擊後個子系統停止運作水準的迅速評估。
(3) 經濟效益
本子計畫的執行主要乃依本中心任務需求,並配合行政院應科方案之 全國災害管理平台之建置,藉以提升資訊的整合分享與實際操作效率。
主要工作將依減災與應變需求內容,分別建置其災害主題圖,據以提 升平台的操作效率。
(5) 其他
建立橋樑篩選分類評估方法及 GIS 圖層,提供後續災害對橋梁衝擊評 估之參考,可提供 CEOC 災害應變與平時減災應用。
所產製之 CI 災害管理應用主題圖,可提供災害管理需求之加值應用,
尤其是應變中心開設時,相關災害衝擊預警發布後,可提供篩選與排 序工具,特別是會造成重大衝擊影響的重要設施優先加強警戒與防護,
藉以強化災害預警及應變研判的效能。
參考文獻
1. Bagheri, E., and Ghorbani, A. (2007). Towards an MDA-Oriented UML Profile for Critical Infrastructure Modeling.
2. Chen, L.C., Wu, J.Y., and Lai, M.J. (2006). “The Evolution of the Natural Disaster Management System in Taiwan.” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 29(4), 633-638.
3. Chen, L.C. (2011). Critical Infrastructure Protection Strategy and Development:
Taiwan(R.O.C)'s Experience, Proceeding of 2011 International Conference on Homeland Security, Office of Homeland Security, Executive Yuan.
4. Chou, C.C., Chen, C.T., Tseng, S.M., and Lin, J.D. (2008). “Model for Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies.” Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, IEEE, October 18-20, Jinan, China
5. Chou, C.C., Caldas, C.H., and O’Connor, J.T. (2007). “Decision Support System for Combined Transportation and Utility Construction Strategy.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1994, 9-16.
6. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) (2004), Guidelines: Risk Analysis – a Basis for Disaster Risk Management, Eschborn: GTZ.
7. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 1991, Bridge Inspector’s Training Manual 90, Revised Edition, Washington, D.C.
8. Fisher, R., and Peerenboom, J. (2000). “Interdependencies: A DOE Perspective.” 16th Annual Security Technology Symposium & Exhibition, Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection, June 28, 2000, Williamsburg, Virginia.
9. Guting R.H., and Schneider, M. (2005). Moving Objects Databases, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
10. Haimes, Y. (2005). “Infrastructure Interdependencies and Homeland Security.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 11(2), 65-66.
11. Haimes, Y., Horowitz B., Lambert, J., Santos, J., Lian, C., and Crowther, K. (2005)
“Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. I: Theory and Methodology.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 11(2), 67-69.
12. Kranc, S.C., Yalcin, A., Tsalatsanis, A., and Collier, N.O. (2007). “The Efficacy of Utility Data Management.” FDOT Research Project BD544-27 Report, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
13. Kraus, E., Quiroga, C., Brown, R., Stevens, C., and Koncz, N. (2007). “Development of a
Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
14. Lewis, Ted. G. (2006). Critical Infrastructure Protection in Homeland Security- Defending A Networked Nation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15. Laefer, D., Koss, A., and Pradhan, A. (2006). “The Need for Baseline Data Characteristics for GIS-Based Disaster Management Systems.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development, ASCE, 132(3), 115-119.
16. Merriam-Webster. (2003). Merriam-Webster’s Eleventh Collegiate Dictionary, Springfield, Mass.
17. MRA. (2005). Joint Infrastructure Interdependencies Research Program (JIIRP) Symposium, the Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada (PSEPC), November 10, 2005, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
18. Müller, M., Vorogushyn, S., Maier, P., Thieken, A. H., Petrow, T., Kron, A., Büchele, B. and Wächter, J. (2006), “CEDIM Risk Explorer – a map server solution in the project ‘Risk Map Germany,’” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 6(5), 711–720.
19. Murry, A. T. and Grubesic, T. H. (2007). Critical Infrastructure- Reliability and Vulnerability, Springer.
20. OGC. (2008) http://www.opengeospatial.org/
21. Oh E. H., and Hastak M. (2011), Impact Analysis of Natural Calamities on Infrastructure and Industries, 4th International i-Rec Conference 2008 Building resilience: achieving effective post-disaster reconstruction (TG 63 - Disaster and The Built Environment), Christchurch, New Zealand.
22. Peachavanish, R., Karimi, H., Akinci, B., and Boukamp, F. (2006). “An ontological engineering approach for integrating CAD and GIS in support of infrastructure management.” Advanced Engineering Informatics, Elsevier, 20, 71-88.
23. Pederson, P., Dudenhoeffer, D., Hartley, S., and Permann, M. (2006). “Critical Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling: A Survey of U.S. and International Research.”
INL/EXT-06-11464, Idaho National Laboratory: Critical Infrastructure Protection Division, Idaho Falls, Idaho.
24. Pradhan, A., Laefer, D., and Rasdorf, W. (2007). “Infrastructure Management Information System Framework Requirements for Disasters.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 21(2), 90-101.
25. Quiroga, C., Ellis, C., Shin, Y.S., and Pina, R. (2002). “A Data Platform for Managing Utilities along Highway Corridors.” TxDOT Research Project 0-2110 Report, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
28. Rinaldi, S., Peerenboom, J., and Kelly, T. (2001). “Identifying, Understanding, and Analyzing Critical Infrastructure Independencies.” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21, 11-25.
29. Tansel, A., Clifford, J., and Gadia, S. (1993). Temporal Databases: Theory, Design, and Implementation, Benjamin-Cummings, San Francisco, CA.
30. Taylor, C. and VanMarcke, E. (2006). Infrastructure Risk Management Processes- Natural, Accidental, and Deliberate hazards, ASCE and American Society of Civil Engineering.
31. Uddin, N., and Engi, D. (2002). “Disaster Management System for Southwestern Indiana.”
Natural Hazards Review, ASCE, 3(1), 19-30.
32. United Nations, International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR) (2004), Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives, Geneva: United Nations Publication.
33. United Nations, International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR) (2009), 2009 UN/ISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, United Nations Publication, Geneva.
34. USFDA. (2003). Disaster preparedness phases, U.S. Federal Drug Administration, Rockville MD.
35. Wolfson, O., Xu, B., Chamberlain, S., and Jiang, L. (1998). “Moving Objects Databases:
Issues and Solutions.” Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, IEEE, Capri, Italy, 111-122.
36. Wolfson, O. (2002). “Moving Objects Information Management: The Database Challenge.”
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2382, 15-26.
37. 921 地震資料分析與災情資訊管理系統: http://gisdb.ncree.gov.tw/ncree/doc/,2011.09.19 38. 內政部社會司,(2011),內政部統計月報。
39. 東日本大賑災復興對策本部,(2011),http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/infra-excel.pdf,
2011.09.19
40. 交通部公路總局公路統計資料_97 年公路橋梁統計資料,2008
http://www.thb.gov.tw/TM/Menus/Menu05/menu05_01.aspx / 97_06.xls.
41. 交通部公路總局,(2004)。橋梁重要程度等級之建立,交通部公路總局委託研究案,128。
畫專業委外服務研究,期末報告。
49. 李欣輯、楊惠萱、廖楷民、蕭代基. (2009),水災社會脆弱度指標之建立,建築與規劃學報,
第 10 卷第 3 期,163–182。
50. 周永川、何泰源、陳福勝,2001,地下維生管線地震防災對策,中華技術,90 年 4 月。
51. 張志宇,陳亮全,蘇昭郎 (2011). 現階段我國關鍵基礎設施安全防護推動策略,環境工程會 刊,第 22 卷,第二期。
52. 徐耀賜,1997。橋梁結構之基本功能,初版,全威圖書有限公司,台北市。
53. 吳佳容、黃詩倩、謝承憲、簡賢文(2011),CI 失效區域災害衝擊評估方法-以示範都會區為 例,2011 臺灣災害管理研討會。
54. 吳啟瑞、鄧敏政、蘇昭郎、傅金城、葉克家、許銘熙、簡賢文 (2011). 山洪災害對石門水庫 及其下游衝擊之風險管理研究,第十五屆海峽兩岸水利科技交流研討
55. 盧鏡臣、郭彥廉、楊惠萱、李香潔.(2009) ,災害的社會經濟衝擊—台灣鄉鎮層級的評估架 構,2009 年臺灣災害管理研討會。
56. 陳亮全、洪鴻智、詹士樑、簡長毅. (2003). “地震災害風險 - 效益分析於土地使用規劃之應用:
應用 HAZ-Taiwan 系統.” 都市與計劃, 中華民國都市計劃學會, 30(4), 281-299.
57. 黃詩倩、謝承憲、吳佳容、簡賢文(2011),建立天然災害下供水系統失效衝擊評估方法,2011,
第 28 屆自來水研究發表會。
58. 經濟部水利署北區水資源局,(2006),石門水庫安全評估綜合報告。
59. 鄧敏政、蘇昭郎、謝承憲、陳進發 (2011a). 公路橋梁之脆弱度衝擊分析 – 以 100 年重點監 測橋樑為例,臺灣公路工程,第 37 卷,第 11 期,30-47。
60. 鄧敏政、蘇昭郎、簡賢文、林育丞 (2011b). 災害管理需求之基礎設施分類-以公路橋梁為例,
2011 臺灣災害管理研討會,台北。
61. 蕭代基、李欣輯、楊惠萱. (2010),災害損失與社會脆弱度評估,國家災害防救科技中心技 術報告 No. NCDR 98–T11。
62. 謝承憲、蘇昭郎、吳佳容,(2010),災害風險評估技術指引(NCDR 98-T13),國家災害防救 科技中心技術報告,台北縣。
63. 謝承憲、蘇昭郎、鄧敏政. (2010),公路橋梁失效之地區脆弱度分析-_以大甲溪流域為例,
中華民國運輸學會 99 學術論文國際研討會,論文集 P.1833~P.1849 頁,民國 99 年 12 月。
64. 謝承憲、蘇昭郎、吳佳容,(2010),災害風險管理與減災之工具,災害防救電子報第 059 期。
65. 羅俊雄、葉錦勳、陳亮全、洪鴻智、簡文郁、廖文義. (2002). “HAZ-Taiwan 地震災害損失評 估系統.” 台大工程學刊, 國立台灣大學工學院, 85, 13-32.
66. 蘇昭郎、周建成、李洋寧、鄧敏政 (2011). 基礎設施系統相依性方法之應用,2011 危機管理 研討會,197-206。