本研究在過程中，已對軍用發動機供應鏈經營中之動態行為與運作模式進行 詳細研究；並以實務界個案分析探討之結果，利用系統動力學動態模型建構出可 供模擬、評估、調控之模型；並由動態模擬獲得之結果，提出產業策略地圖，以 供我國軍用發動機後勤維修策略之參考。
受限於時間與研究規模，未能將企業無形資產如人力資源、資訊系統及組織 理論與設計等納入本研究進行模擬，是為本研究之不足。因此建議後續研究者可 朝下列方向，進行更深入的研究：
（一）建議將人力資源、資訊系統與組織理論與設計等無形資產部分納入模型，
以符實需。
（二）運用網路技術，依需求於線上模擬。
目前美海軍已將類似系統（OSCAM）運用於後勤決策支援上，而國軍尚未 有此類完整決策支援系統或僅為局部資訊系統。國內網路技術發達，經過適當的 設計，由前端的使用介面，依其需求及權限，連接後端資料庫進行模擬，作為決 策依據及調整的方向。
參考文獻
一、中文部份
林英峰，壽命週期成本法，台北商略印書館，1977。
關季明，維護度工程與系統可用度，中華民國品質學會，1997，168-169。
李順德，整體後勤支援原理及應用，台北華泰，1997。
國防部，國軍主要武器系統整體後勤支援教則，2004。
朱豔芳、范淼，後勤管理導論，台北黎明，1998。
張倫，作業管理，華泰文化事業公司，2003。
鄭穎聰，供應鏈長鞭效應因應政策之研究，國立台北科技大學生產系統工程與管 理研究所碩士論文，1999。
鄧祖漢，供應商代管庫存模式在緊固件供應鏈之企業動態經營研究，國立中山大 學國際高階經營碩士學程專班碩士論文，2002。
陳文鎮，武器系統全壽期成本模式建立之研究，國防大學中正理工學院兵器系統 工程研究所碩士論文，2004。
杜強國，以系統動力學探討平衡計分卡策略動態搭配原則，中山大學企業管理研 究所博士論文，2004。
吳綠惠，策略目標動態決策機制之研究－以 W 電子公司為例，中山大學企業管理 研究所碩士專班論文，2005。
屠益民，系統動力學理論與應用，國立中山大學資訊管理學系碩士班課程講義，
2003。
黎漢林、許景華、李明純，張李治平，供應鏈管理與決策(最佳化方法之應用)，
儒林書局，ISBN-957-499-358-2，2000。
彼得.聖吉，第五項修練-學習型組織的藝術與實務，天下文化出版，1994。
二、英文部份
Akkermans, H. and Kim van Oorschot, 2002, Developing a Balanced Scorecard with System Dynamics, full paper on CD-ROM Proceeding of 2002 International System Dynamics Conference, Palermo, Italy.
Blanchard, B. S. and Fabrycky, W. J., 1998, Systems Engineering and Analysis, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. J..
Bloomberg D. J., Lemay S., Hanna J. B., 2002, Logistics, Prentice Hall
Brewer, Peter C. and Thomas W. Speh, 2000, Using the Balanced Scorecard to Measure Supply Chain Performance, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol.21, No.1, pp.75-93
Cole, P.A., Jr. 1991. Manpower Personnel and Training (MPT) on Life-cycle Cost.
Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Vol.2:pp.842-848.
Ebling C. E., 1997, An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering.
Boston:Irwin McGraw-Hill
Forrester, Jay W. 1961. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, Mass: The M.I.T. Press.
Forrester, Jay W. 1968. Principles of Systems. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Forrester, Jay W. and Peter M. Senge. 1980. Tests for Building Confidence in System Dynamics Models. in A. A. Legasto Jr., J. W. Forrester and J. M. Lyneis(ed.). System Dynamics, 209-228. New York:North-Holland.
Frank, Schoeneborn., 2003, Linking Bala nced Scorecard to System Dynamics, International System Dynamics Conference.
General Service Administration. 1973, U.S.A. Applying LCC in the Federal Supply Service
Goodman, Michael R. 1974. Study Notes in System Dynamics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Wright-Allen Press.
Joel, M. Manary, 1995, Cost Analysis Strategy Assessment Module (CASA user’s manual), version 3.01, DSMC Logistics Support Department
Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, 1992, The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, 1996a, Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System, Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., 75-85.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, 1996b, The Balanced Scorecard, Boston, MA：
Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, 2000b,The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment, Boston,
MA：Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, Robert S., and Norton, David P. 2003. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes, Harvard Business School Press, Boston,
Massachusetts.
Lyneis, J. M. 1980. Corporate Planning and Policy Design: A System Dynamics Approach. Halliday Lithograph. ISBN-0-262-12083-6.
Malmi, T., 2001, Balanced Scorecards in Finnish Companies, Management Accounting Research, 12, 207-220.
Meadows, Donella H. 1980. The Unavoidable A Priori, In Randers, JØ rgen (ed.). Elements of the System Dynamics Method, 23-57. Cambridge, Massachusetts:
The M.I.T. Press.
Morecroft, John D. W.1988. System dynamics and microworlds for policymakers.
European Journal of OPerational Research, 35: 301-320.
Nørreklit, H., 2000, The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard- A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions, Management Accounting Research, 11, 65-88.
Paich, Mark and John D. Sterman. 1993. Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets. Management Science, 39(12): 1439-1458.
Senge, Peter M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Press.
Senge, Peter M., Art Kleiner, Charlotte Roberts, Richard B. Ross, and Bryan J. Smith.
1994. The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learing Organization. New York: Doubleday Press.
Silk, S., 1998, Automating The Balanced Scorecard, Management Accounting, 76, May, 38-44
Sterman, John D. 1989. Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment, Management Science, 35(3): 321-339.
Sterman, John D., Nelson P. Repenning, and Fred Kofman. 1997. Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Science, 43(4): 503-521.
Sterman, John D. 2000. Business Dyamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston:Irwin McGraw-Hill.
System Acquisition Symposium, 1981, Life-cycle Costs, BDM Corporation, Vol.4 U.S. Department of Defense, 1984, MIL-HDBK-338, Washington D.C.
Warren J.L. and Weitz K.A., 1994, Development of an Integrated Life Cycle Cost Assessment Model, Electronics and the Environment, pp.155–163.
Wolstenholme, E., 1990, System Enquiry: A System Dynamics Approach, England:
John-Wiley & Sons Ltd.