• 沒有找到結果。

第五章、 研究結論

5.4 後續研究建議

1.加入不同契合度產品

本研究在契合度的組成分為原型與典範,並只探討高典範高原型與低典範與 低原型的產品組合,未來可以探討兩種契合度高低的組合,可以對各類型延伸契 合度的產品做更深入的探討。

2.採用其他依變數

本研究以購買意圖作為依變項,後續的研究可以考慮加入不同的依變項探討,

例如:再購意圖、品牌滿意度等,如此可以對於消費者對於延伸產品的購買行為 有更多的了解。

3.採其他自變項對於購買意圖的影響

本研究探討契合度與知覺風險對於購買意圖的影響,未來可以探討消費者的 各種涉入程度對於購買行為的影響,例如產品涉入、廣告涉入、購買涉入等等,

可以從更多面向來探討消費者在於延伸產品的購買決策。

4.擴大研究範圍

本研究主要以南部地區的消費者為研究對象,未來可以擴大樣本為各地區的 消費者,甚至是比較兩岸三地不同地區的消費者對於延伸產品購買的看法。

69

參 考 文 獻

中文文獻

1. 李偉豪(2005),從主觀的品牌權益探討品牌延伸-以我國電子資訊自創品牌 廠商為例,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,嘉義。

2. 吳鎮全(2006),從品牌聯想觀點探討購買利益與顧客忠誠度關聯性之分析 -台灣液晶電視產業品牌經營之實證研究,國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論

文,台北。

3. 范惟翔、莊立民、林忠勳(2006),品牌聯想、知覺風險對企業主管購買意願 之影響研究,經營管理論叢, 2(2),嘉義。

4. 陳又新(2008),從知覺品質觀點探討品牌延伸策略對消費者購買意向之影 響—以華碩數位電視為例研,國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文,台北。

5. 陳睿傑(2011),影響消費者對母品牌與延伸產品之購買意願因素-以知覺風險 與品牌承諾為干擾,國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文,高雄。

6. 黃蘭貴(2008),品牌形象、涉入程度、與延伸契合度對品牌態度的影響 -以捷安特品牌延伸為例,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文,高雄。

7. 劉雅婷(2011),探討企業品牌延伸策略與品牌關係架構關係之研究-以食品產 業、日用品產業、奢侈品產業為例,國立屏東科技大學企業管理研究所碩士 論文,屏東。

英文文獻

8. Aaker, D. A. and Kevin, L. K. (1990), “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,"Journal of Marketing, 1(54), 27-41.

9. Aaker, D. A. and Keller, K. L. (1992), “The Effects of Sequential Intro-ductions of Brand Extension,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 35-50.

70

10. Aaker, D. A. (1992), “The Value of Brand Equity,"Journal of business strategy, 27-32.

11. Aaker, D. A. (1996), “Building Strong Brand,” Social Marketing Quarterly, 7(2),

36-40.

12. Ahluwalia, Rohini, and Zeynep G. C. (2000), “The Effects of Extensions on the Family Brand Name: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 371-381.

13. Alba, Joseph W. J., Wesley H., and John G. L. (1991), "Memory and Decision Making," in Handbook of Consumer Behavior, eds. Thomas Robertson and Harold Kassarjian, New York: Prentice Hall, 1-49.

14. Athaide, T. (1994), “Realize the Risk in a Strategy of Brand Extension,”

Marketing, August, 6.

15. Bansal, H. S. and Voyer, P. A. (2000), “Word-of-Mouth Processes Within a Services Purchase Decision Context,” Journal of Service Research , 3(2), 166-177.

16. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research,"Conceptual, Strategic, Statistical Consid , 1173-1182.

17. Barwise (1993), “Brand equity: Snark or boojum? "Journal of Research in Marketing, 10 (1), 93-104.

18. Blackston, C. (1992), “Observations: Building Brand Eqity By Managing The Brand’s Relationship,” Journal of Advertising Research, 32(3), 79-83.

19. Blattberg, R. C. and Wisniewski, K. J. (1989), “Price Induced Patterns of Competition,” Marketing Science, 8 (3) , 291-309.

20. Boush, D. M. and Barbara L. (1991), “A Process-Tracing Study of Brand

71

Extension Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (1), 16–28.

21. Bonner, G. P. and Nelson, R. (1985), Product Attributes and Perceived Quality:

Foods. In: J. Jacoby and J. C. Olson, (Eds.), Perceived Quality, Lexington Books, 81-102.

22. Bottomley, P. A. and Stephen J. S. (2001), ‘‘Do We Really Know How Consumers Evaluate Brand Extensions? Empirical Generalizations Based on Secondary Analysis of Eight Studies,’’ Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 494-500.

23. Broniarczyk, S. M. and Alba, J. W. (1994), “The Importance of the Brand in Extension,"Journal of Marketing, 31(May ), 214-228.

24. Burke, R. R., Oliva, A., and Rangswamy, A. (1993), “Brand Equity and the Extendibility of Brand Names,” Internationl Joumal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 61-75.

25. Dacin, P. A. and Daniel, C. S. (1994), “The Effect of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (2), 229–42.

26. Doyle, M. (1990), “Building Successful Brands:The Strategic Options,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(2), 5-20.

27. Farquhar, P. H. (1989), “Managing Brand Equity,” Marketing Research, 7, 24-33.

28. Farquhar, P. H. (1990), “Managing Brand Equity,” Journal of Advertising Research , 30,7-12.

29. Farquhar, P. H., Ham, J. Y., and Ijiri, Y. (1992), “Brands on the Balance Sheet, ”Marketing Management, 1(1), 16-22.

30. Franziska, V., Henrik, S., Thorsten H. T., and Christian M. R. (2010), “The Role

72

of Parent Brand Quality for Service Brand Extension Success” Journal of Service Research , 13 , 379-396.

31. Garretson, J. A. and Kenneth E. C. (1999), “The Influence of Coupon Fair Value on Service Quality Wxpectation, Risk Perception and Purchase Intention in the Dental Indsutry,” Journal of Service Marketing, 13(1), 59-72.

32. Grazioli, S. and Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2000), “Perils of Internet Fraud: An Empirical Investigation of Deception and Trust with Experienced Internet Consumers,”

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(4), 395-410.

33. Hem, L. E., Gronhaug, K., and Lines, R. (2000), “Exploring the importance of product category similarity and selected personal correlates in brand extensions”, The Journal of Brand Management, 7(3), 197-209.

34. Hem, L. E., Chernatony, L. D., and Iversen, N. M. (2003), ‘‘Factors Influencing Successful Brand Extensions,’’ Journal of Marketing Management, 19 (7/8), 781-806.

35. Hoover, R. J., Green, R. T., and Saegert, J. (1978), “A Cross-National Study of Perceived Risk,” Journal of Marketing, 42, 102-108.

36. Hoyer, D. and Macinnis, D. J. (2010), Consumer Behavior, 5th International ed., Cengage Learning Inc.

37.

IsabelBuil, E. and Mart´ınez, L. D. (2009), “Brand Extension Effects on Brand Equity National:ACross-Study” Journal of Euro marketing, 18, 71–88.

38. Kapferer, J. (1992), Strategic Brand Management: New Approaches to Creating and Evaluating Brand Equity, London: Kogan-Page.

73

39. Keller, K. L. (1993), “Conceptualizing 、 Measuring 、 and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity, "Journal of Marketing , 57(January) , 1-22.

40. Kim, C. K., Lavack, A. M., and Smith, M. (2001), ‘‘Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands,” Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 211-222.

41. Klink, Richard R., and Daniel C. S. (2001), ‘‘Threats to the External Validity of Brand Extension Research,’’ Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (3), 326-335.

42. Kotler, P. H. (1991), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control, 8th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

43. Loken, B. and James W. (1990), “Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (September), 111-26.

44. Loken, B. and John, D. R. (1993), “Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact? "Journal of Marketing, 57,July , 71-84.

45. Louviere, L. and Johnson, R. (1988), “Measuring brand image with conjoint analysis and choice models", In L. Leuthesser, ed., MSI report, Cambridge, MA:

Marketing Science Institute: 88-104.

46. Malt, Barbara C. (1989), “An On-Line Investigation of Prototype and Exemplar Strategies in Classification,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15 (4), 539-55.

47. Mao, H. and Krishnan, H. S. (2006), “Effects of Prototype and Exemplar Fit on Brand Extension Evaluations: A Two-Process Contingency Model."Journal of consumer research, inc. ,33( June).

48.

Martínez, E. D. and Chernatony L. (2004),

The effect of brand extension

74

strategies upon brand image,”

Journal of Consumer Marketing

, 21(1), 39–50.

49. Martı´nez, E. D. and Jose´ M. P. (2005), “Influence of Corporate Image on Brand Extensions: A Model Applied to the Service Sector,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 11 (4), 263-281.

50. Mark, B. H. and Torsten, H. (2009), ‘‘Conceptualizing and Measuring the Monetary Value of Brand Extensions: The Case of Motion Pictures,’’ Journal of Marketing, 73(November), 167-183.

51. McWilliam, G. and Chernatony, L. D. (1989), “Branding terminology: The real debate,” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 7(7/8), 29-32.

52. McWilliam, G. (1993), “The effect of brand typology on brand extension fit:

commercial and academic research findings”, European Advances in Consumer Research, 1, 485-91.

53. Mitchell, V. W. and Boustani, P. (1994),“A Preliminary Investigation into Pre- and Post-Purchase Risk Perception and Reduction,” European Journal of Marketing, 28(1) , 56-71.

54. Monga, A. B. and John, D. R. (2007), “ Cultural Differences in Brand Extension Evaluation: The Influence of Analytic versus Holistic Thinking"Journal of consumer research, Inc. , 33 (March), 529-539.

55. Monga, A. B. and John, D. R. (2010), “ What Makes Brands Elastic? The Influence of Brand Concept and Styles of Thinking on Brand Extension Evaluation,"Journal of Marketing, 74( May) , 80-92.

56. Oglivy, D. (1995), mentioned that the price promotions unfavorably affect brand evaluations. Free Press.

75

57. Park, C. W., Milberg, S., and Lawson, R. (1991), “Evaluation of Brand Extensions:

The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2), 185-93.

58. Peter, D. (1990), “Building Successful Brands: The Strategic Options,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7 (2), 5-20.

59. Pitta, D. A. and Katsanis, L. P. (1995), “Understanding brand equity for successful brand extension. "Journal of consumer research, 12 (4) . 51-64.

60. Randal, T., Ulrich, K., and Reibstein, D. (1998), “Brand Equity and Vertical Product Line Extent,” Marketing Science, 17(4), 356-379.

61. Reast, J. D. (2003), “The role of brand trust within related and unrelated brand extension activities: a consumer perspective”, unpublished PhD thesis, Leeds University Business School, Leeds University, Leeds, January.

62. Reast, J. D. (2005), “Brand trust and brand extension acceptance: the relationship

"Journal of Product & Brand Management , 14(1), 4–13.

63. Roselius (1971), “Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods. " The Journal of marketing, 35(1), 56-64.

64. Sheinin, D. A. and Schmitt, B. H. (1994), “Extending Brands With New Product Concepts: The Role of Category Attribute Congruity, Brand Affect, and Brand Breadth,” Journal of Business Research, 31 (September), 1-10.

65. Sheinin, D. A. (2000), “The Effects Of Experience With Brand Extensions On Parent Brand Knowledge,” Journal of Business Research, 49(1), 47-55.

66. Simon, C. J. and Mary W. S. (1993), “The measurment and determinants of brand equity: a financial approach. "Marketing Science, 12 (Winter), 28-52.

67. Smith, D. C. (1992), “Brand Extensions and Advertising Efficiency: What can and

76

cannot be Expected,” Journal of Advertising Research, 32(6), 11-20.

68. Smith, D. C. and Andrews, J. (1995), “Rethinking the effect of perceived fit on customers’ perceptions of new products”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(Winter), 115-24.

69. Springen, K. and Miller, A. (1990), “Sequels for the Shelf,” Newsweek(July 9), 42-43.

70. Tauber, E. M. (1981), “Brand Franchise Extension: New Product Benefit from Existing Brand Name,” Business Horzons, l(24), 36-41.

71. Tauber, E. M. (1988), "Brand Leverage: Strategy for Growth in a Cost Controlled World," Journal of Advertising Research, 28 (August/September), 26-30.

72. Van, R., Allard C. R., Jos L., and Hans, O. (2001), “Consumer Evaluations of Service Brand Extensions, ” Journal of Service Research, 3 (3), 220-231.

73. Vo¨lckner, Franziska and Henrik, S. (2006), “Drivers of Brand Extension Success,

"Journal of Marketing, 70 (April), 18-34.

74. Vo¨lckner, Franziska and Henrik S. (2007), “Empirical Generalizability of Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions, "International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (June), 149-162.

75. Zeynep, G. C. and Maheswaran, D. (1998), “The Effects of Extensions on Brand Name Dilution and Enhancement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (4), 464–73.

76. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,"Journal of Marketing, l(52), 2-22.

77

附錄 A、前測問卷

第一部分

飛利浦電子公司簡介

皇家飛利浦電子公司是世界上最大的電子公司之一,於 1891 製造

燈泡

起家,20 世紀初成為歐洲最大的碳絲極燈生產者,隨著公司規模的擴大產品也開始多角化

發展,跟隨時代的趨勢推出創新來改善人們的生活品質並專注於

健康舒適

質生活

領域,現今飛利浦已在醫療保健、優質生活和照明領域成為了全球領導

者。

1. 您是否使用過飛利浦的產品 是 否 2. 您使用過哪些產品(可複選)

(1) 照明設備 : 燈泡 檯燈 車燈 吊燈 (2) 影音產品 : 收音機 藍光撥放器 家庭劇院 手持攝影機 車用影音

(3) 電子產品 : 電話 耳機&喇叭 液晶顯示器 筆記型電腦 光碟機 平板電腦

(4)個人保健用品: 刮鬍刀 電動牙刷 吹風機

(5)家庭生活用品: 淨水器 電磁爐 果汁機 吸塵器 熨斗 您好!

這是一份有關於品牌延伸產品的問卷,目的在於了解品牌延伸產品的定位,請閱讀以下 說明後,依據您目前的認知與使用現況填答。本研究結果僅供學術研究使用,您的資料不會 單獨呈現及外流,請安心作答,謝謝您的配合

國立高雄大學 亞太工商管理學系碩士班 指導教授:莊寳鵰 博士 研 究 生:黃宇暉 敬上

78

麵包機 熱水壺 (6)其他:__________________________

附錄 A、(續)

3. 您同意燈泡為飛利浦最主要銷售產品嗎? □ □ □ □ □ 4. 您同意燈泡是最能代表飛利浦的產品嗎? □ □ □ □ □

第二部分 契合度 一、典範契合度

本研究以飛利浦燈泡作為典範契合度比較的基準,請以燈泡所具備的特徵與其功 能比較與其他延伸產品間的契合度

1. 您認為防眩光檯燈與燈泡的功能或特徵是相似的嗎? □ □ □ □ □ 2. 您認為平板電腦與燈泡的功能或特是相似的嗎? □ □ □ □ □ 非 不 沒 同 非 常 同 有 意 常 不 意 意 同 同 見 意 意

非 不 沒 同 非 常 同 有 意 常 不 意 意 同 同 見 意 意

79

附錄 A、(續)

二、原型契合度

飛利浦在 2011 年的最新廣告以輕鬆、樂趣、健康成長的產品概念來為他旗下的 產品注入新的品牌概念,本研究以飛利浦 2011 的形象廣告作為原型契合度的比

較基準,請以「

一小步,飛利浦健康好生活

」作為品牌的形象或概念來

評價延伸產品的原型契合度。

飛利浦 2011 形象廣告

3. 您同意防眩光檯燈符合「健康好生活」的品牌形象嗎? □ □ □ □ □ 4. 您同意平板電腦符合「健康好生活」的品牌形象嗎? □ □ □ □ □ 非 不 沒 同 非 常 同 有 意 常 不 意 意 同 同 見 意 意

80

附錄 A、(續)

此部份採不記名,詢問您有關個人基本資料,僅供學術研究之用,絕不對外 公開,請您安心填答,並在下列各問項中勾選最適當的選項。

1. 請問您的性別? □男 □女

2. 請問您的年齡? □20歲以下 □20-29歲 □30-39歲 □40-49歲 □50-59 歲 □60歲以上

3. 請問您的教育程度? □國中及以下 □高中 □大專 □碩士 □博士 4. 請問您的職業? □學生 □農林漁牧業 □傳統製造業 □電子資訊業 □服

務業

□軍公教 □家管□其他

5. 請問您的每月平均收入?□ 2 萬元以內 □ 2-3 萬元 □ 3-4 萬元 □ 4-5 萬元 □ 5-6 萬元 □ 6-7 萬元 □ 7-8 萬元 □ 8 萬元以上

本問卷到此結束 謝謝您的作答 祝您身體健康 萬事如意

81

附錄 B、平板電腦正式問卷

壹、 背景說明

一、請閱讀以下介紹飛利浦電子公司簡介

皇家飛利浦電子公司是世界上最大的電子公司之一,於 1891 製造

燈泡

起家,20 世紀初成為歐 洲最大的碳絲極燈生產者,隨著公司規模的擴大產品也開始多角化發展,跟隨時代的趨勢推出

創新來改善人們的生活品質並專注於

健康舒適

優質生活

領域,現今飛利浦已在醫療保健、

優質生活和照明領域成為了全球領導者。

親愛的先生、小姐,您好:

非常感謝您撥冗填答此份學術性問卷。此份問卷的目的主要在探討「品牌延伸產品的定位、品牌權 益與知覺風險對購買意圖的影響」,本研究的完成極需您的協助與幫忙,懇請惠予協助參與。

本研究所搜集的資料均採不具名的方式蒐集,所有資料僅供學術研究之用,且嚴格保密,絕對 不會呈現任何個人相關資訊,敬請放心填答!這份問卷並沒有標準答案,請您就實際的狀況,選擇

本研究所搜集的資料均採不具名的方式蒐集,所有資料僅供學術研究之用,且嚴格保密,絕對 不會呈現任何個人相關資訊,敬請放心填答!這份問卷並沒有標準答案,請您就實際的狀況,選擇

相關文件