• 沒有找到結果。

本研究所設定的對象為國貿人員為主,在研究過程上受到內外部因素限制,

因此,仍有許多問題並未能加以深入去探討,需要待後續的研究者努力研究。茲 簡要的舉例如下,以供參考。

(一)對企業的建議

企業在導入教育訓練時,應給予受訓者一目標,能透過這樣目標的激進讓受 訓者體悟企業給予員工受訓後之期待。企業主也能參考人格特質之結果,可以作 為企業主往後在遴選未來在內部訓練之資深主講者;而在組織氣候部分,企業主也 能參考並極力讓企業的氛圍能夠成為受訓者之動力;最後,在訓練遷移的部分,企 業主對於員工在受訓後對於工作上的成效也能有一定的程度上的認知。

(二)對產官學之建議

政府因台灣對外貿易日益約增,也發現國貿人員之需求漸漸增加。因此發展 出中華民國對外貿易發展協會(簡稱外貿協會或貿協)由經濟部於結合民間工商團 體設立之公益性財團法人,以協助業者拓展對外貿易。未來政府應該亦可以積極 的在其他縣市舉辦相關國貿之在職訓練課程,因目前只限制在某幾個縣市授課。

如此,對於其他在職學習者,恐怕失去能夠學習專業能力之機會。

(三)對後續研究者之建議

本研究之對象上,因受限於內外在因素影響,無法大量針對特定產業的國貿 人員進行研究,建議後續研究者能夠針對特定產業上之國貿人員來進行研究,如 此對於能夠檢視在特定產業之問題,並且提出不同之論點與結果。

然而,本研究在構面上,主要是探討人格特質、學習動機、組織氣候對訓練 遷移的影響,未來建議後續研究者能夠加入或是嘗試其他不同之文獻探討來探究

78

是否仍有其他因素及影響之構面,將其納入研究架構,進而使得研究結果能夠更 具有完整性。

最後,本研究在的方法上,資料之分析方法分為量化與質化,然本研究以問 卷調查之量化資料來代表國貿人員在訓練遷移整體上的認知。未來研究者可配合 專家訪談、觀察等方法進行研究,則更能獲得更深入及真實的研究結果。

79

80

學術研討論文(RCTED Working Paper Series)、 No.2001-0002, p5-6。

葉美鈴。 (2011) 。第一線工作人員人格特質、組織氣候及工作滿意度關係之研究。

碩士, 國立雲林科技大學(已出版)。

81

Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality . New York : Holt, 28.

Allport, G. W. (1965). Letters from Jenny. New York : Harcourt, Brace & World.

Baldwin, T. T., & Ford J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and direction for future research. Personnel Psychology,, 1, 63-105.

Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology,, 41(1), 63-105.

Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology,, 41, 63-101.

Baldwin, T. T., & Magjuka, R. J. (1991). "Organizational training and signals of

importance: Linking pre-training perceptions to intentions to transfer”. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2, 25-36.

Bandura, A. (1988). Organisational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Managemet,, 13,, 275-302.

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.

Bates, R. A., Holton, E. F. I., Seyler, D. L., & Carvalho, M. A. (2000). The role of interpersonal factors in the application of computer-based training in an industrial setting,. Human Resource Development International, 3(1), 19-42.

Beitler, M. A. (1997). Mid-eareer adult in self -directed graduate program.

Paper presented at the International Symposium in Self-Directed Learning Orlando, FL,20-23.

Bernadine, D. G. (1991). Development and validation of a transfer-of-training system.

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Bogdan Yamkovenko, E. H. (2010b). Dispositional Influences in transfer of Learning.

Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(4). doi: 10.1002/hrdq

82

Brinkerhoff. (1998). An integrated evaluation model for HRD. Training & Development, 42(2), 66-68.

Brissett, M., & Nowicki, S. J. (1976). Internal versus external of reinforcement and reaction to frustration. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25, 35-39.

Bruke, L., and, & Hutchins, H. (2007). Training transfer : An integrative literature review.

Human Resource Development Review, 16(3,), 263-296.

Cattell, R. B., Eber, H W.,, & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen

Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign,, IL: Institute for PErsonality and Ability Testing.

Chiaburu, D. S., & and Marinova, S. V. (2005). What predicts skill transfer? An

exploratory study of goal orientation, training self-efficacy and organizational supports. International Journal of Training and Development, 9(2), 110-123.

Costa P T., & McCrae R R. (1992). The Introduction of the Five-Factor Model and Its Application,. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.

Costa P T., a., & McCrae R R. (1986). Personality stability and its implications for clinical psychology,. Clinical Psychology Review 6(407-423).

Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organization effectiveness,. John Wiley &

Sons, New York.

Ford, T. T. B. a. K. (1998). Transfer of Training: A Review and Direction for Future Research. Personnel Psychology,, Spring,1998,, p.65.

Funder, D. C. (1991). Global traits : A neo-Allportian approach to personality.

Psychological Science, 2, 31-39.

Georgenson, D. L. (1982). The Problem of Transfer Calls for Partnership. Training &

Development, 36(10), 75-78.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The big five factor.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 59(6), 1216-1229.

Gregoire, T. K., & Jennifer Propp., & John Poertner. (1998). The supervisor’s role in the transfer of training. Administration in Social Work,, 22(1), 1-18.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatheam, R. L.,&Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis(5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Hogan, R., Harkness, A.,& Lubinski, D. (2000). Personality and individual differences.In Pawlik, k. & Rosenzweig, M.(Eds.). International handbook of psychology (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.), p.283-304.

Hogan, R. T., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychological Association,, 51(5), 469-477.

Holton, E. F. I. (1996). The flawed four-level evaluation model. Human Resource

83

Development Quarterly, 7(1), 5-21.

Houle, C. O. (1961). The inquiring mind.Madison : University of Wisconsin Press.

Huczynski, A. A., &, & Lewis, J. w. (1980). An empirical study into the learning transfer process in management training. Journal of Management Studies, 17, 227-240.

James, L. R., James, L. A., & Ashe, D. K. (1990). The meaning of organizations : The role of cognition and values. Organizational Climate and Culture, 40– 84).

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Technique for evaluating training programs-The Four Levels.

San Francisco.

Komarraju, M., & Karau, S. J. (2005). The Relationship between the Big Five Personality Traits and Academic Motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 557-567.

Kontoghiorghes, C. (2001). A holistic approach towards motivation to learn.

Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(4), 233-246.

Machin, M. A. (2002). Planning, managing, and optimizing transfer of training. Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development.San Fran-cisco:

Jossey-Bass.

Maslow. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review,, 50(1), 32-396.

MBA. 卡特爾 16PF, from

http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E5%8D%A1%E7%89%B9%E5%B0%9416PF McCrae R R., a., & Costa P T., J. (1985). Updating Norman's "adequate taxonomy":

Intelligence and personaility dimensions in natural language and questionnaires.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710-721.

McCrae, R. R., & Allik, J. E. (2002). The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures.

New York:: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr (1985). Updation Norman’s “ adequate taxonomy” : Intelligence and personality dimesions in natural language and questionnaires ,.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 49, 710-721.

Michalak DF. (1981). The neglected half of training,. Training and Development Journal,, 35(5), 22-28.

Morstain, B. R., &, & Smart, J. C. (1974). Reasons for participation in adult education courses: A multivariate analysis of group difference. Adult Education,, 24(2), 83-98.

Moscoso, S., & Iglesias, M. (2009). Job experience and big five personality dimensions.

International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(2), 239-242.

Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees' attributes and attitudes:Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Managment Review,, 11, 736-749.

Noe, R. A. (1986b). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training

84

effectiveness. Academy of Management Review,, 11, 736-749.

Noe, R. A., & Schimitt, N. (1986a). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology,, 39, 497-523.

Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes:

Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,, 66(574-583).

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Olsen, J. H. (1998). The evaluation and enhancement of training transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 2(1), 61-75.

Parry. (1977). Evaluating the impact of training:A collection of tools and techniques.

American Society for Training & Development.

Peters, L. H., & , & O’Connor, E. J. (1980). Situational constraints and work outcomes:

The influence of a frequently overlooked construct. Academy of Management Review,, 5, 391-397.

Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., and, & Costa P T., J. (1991). Adjective Check List Scales and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(630-637).

Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond coldconceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroomcontextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review ofEducational Research,, 63,, 167-199.

Rotter. (1996). Generalized Expectancies for InternalVersus External Control of Reinforcement,. Psychological Monographs,, 80(1), 1-28.

Rouiller, J. Z., and, & Goldstein, I. L. (1993). The Relationship Between Organizational Transfer Climateand Positive Transfer of Training. Human Resource Development Quarterly,, 4(4), 377-390.

Rouiller, J. Z., & Goldstein, I. L. (1993). The relationship between organizational transfer climate and positive transfer of training. Human Resource Development

Quarterly, 4(4), 377-390.

Runoa, W., Leimbach, M., Holton, E., , & and Bates, R. (2002 ). The relationship between learner utility reactions and predicted learning transfer among trainers. International Journal of Training and Development, 6(4), 218-228.

Salgado, J. F. (1997). The Five-Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology,, 82(1), 30-43.

Susan, E. C., &, & Judith , A. K. (2004). An Examination of Work-Environment Support Factors

Affecting Transfer of Supervisory Skills Training to the Workplace. Human Respurce Development Quarterly, 15(4), 449-471.

85

Tracey, J. B., & Michael , J. T. (1995). Training effectiveness accounting for individual characteristics and the work environment. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 36-42.

Tracey, J. B., Tannenbaum , S. I., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1995a). Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment,. journal of Applied

Psychology, 80, 239-252.

Tracey, J. B., Tannenbaum , S. I., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1995b). Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. American Psychological Association,, 80(2), 239-252.

Tracey, J. B., & Tews, M. J. (2005). Construct validity of a general training climate scale.

Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 353-375.

Tziner, A., Haccoun, R. R., & Kadish, A. (1991). Personal Andsituational Characteristics Influencing the Effectiveness Oftransfer of Training Improvement Strategies,.

Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64(2), 167-177.

Washington, C. L. (2002). The relationships among learning transfer climate, transfer self-efficacy, goal commitment, and sales performance in an organization undergoing planned change. Ph.D, , The Ohio State University.

Wexley, K. N., &, & Latham, G. P. (1991). Developing and training human resources in organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

Xiao, J. (1996). The Relationship Between Organizational Factors and the Transfer of Training in the Electronics Industry in Shenzhen,. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(1), 55-73.

86 電子郵件: giga3388@hotmail.com

*問卷填寫說明:

87

88

89 關□其他____________________。

10.我認為一星期參加幾小時的訓練課程是有幫助的?

90

□2小時□2-4小時□5-6小時□6-8小時□8小時以上。

11.您目前任職機構的員工人數:□100 人以下 □100(含)~300 人 □300(含)~500 人

□500(含)~1000 人 □1000(含)~3000 人 □3000(含)人以上

【問卷到此結束,感謝您在百忙中抽空協助,在此致上誠摯的感謝!】

91

資料特性 資料類型 樣本數 百分比

1 性別 女 47 58.8%

男 33 41.3%

2 年齡 21~30 歲 68 85.0%

31~40 歲 10 12.5%

41~50 歲 1 1.3%

51~60 歲 1 1.3%

3 教育程度 大學 51 63.8%

專科 7 8.8%

碩士 22 27.5%

4 累計工作年 資

1-3 年 65 81.2%

4-6 年 9 11.3%

7-9 年 2 2.5%

10 年以上 4 5.0%

5 參加教育訓 練次數

1-3 次 66 82.0%

附錄(二): 本研究之背景資料別彙總表

92

93

94

95

.501 .798

同儕支持 .623 3.401 56.688 .844 .766

.795 .748 .738

訓練遷移 反應層次 .839 1.831 61.048 .730 .904

.557

學習層次 .843 2.026 67.548 .759 .813

.809

行為層次 .551 1.671 55.695 .796 .655

.635

結果層次 .840 2.084 69.481 .777 .829

.831

相關文件