第五章 研究結論
第三節 研究限制及對未來研究建議
由於本研究是採用問卷調查和田野調查進行資料蒐集分析，產生了某些資料 蒐集來源的限制。以下列出本論文之研究限制，並提出研究建議，作為未來研究
56
可發展的方向：
(1) 本研究是以中國金屬包裝產業為例，中國對於民間產業研究方面較不盛行，
使得在蒐集資料樣本方面產生很多困難和阻礙，蒐集的樣本較少。建議後續 研究者可採用台灣產業鏈當作研究對象，以便收集較大樣本，以擴大論點的 真實性。
(2) 本研究採用物流資訊分享、知識分享，知識創造來衡量全球價值鏈框架下的 交易複雜度、交易符碼化程度，供應商能力三項因子變數。然而這些衡量變 數並不全然能解釋全球價值鏈框架下的三項因子。建議後續學者研究可增加 其它因子加以解釋權力不對稱關係。
(3) 由於本研究目的只單純探討三項因子對權力不對稱程度是否有相關影響，因 此不探討因子間交互作用的影響，後續研究可進一步探討不同因子在交互作 用下，是否對權力不對稱程度產生相關的影響。
(4) 本研究利用社會網絡分析指標加以解釋廠商之間的關係，由於研究目的旨在 探討廠商權力不對稱關係，研究只採用程度中心性指標、結構洞分析相關指 標和網絡密度指標。社會網絡分析指標眾多，解釋的意義也有所不同，建議 後續研究者可利用其它指標解釋產業其它特性。
(5) 本研究論點是以權力不分大小廠商，在樣本蒐集方面並沒有去探討廠商的資 本大小。建議後續研究者，蒐集廠商成立時間、資本、人數多寡等等，加以 論證廠商在有效位置，或者是分享和獲取較大的廠商，是否為較大的廠商。
57
參考文獻
一、中文部分
1. 林彥亨，2007，網絡結構對創新績效的影響-以高科技產業聚落為例，國立 高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理學系碩士論文。
2. 邱議德，2003，以社會網絡分析法評估工作團隊知識創造與分享，國立中正 大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
3. 凃吟臻，2008，關係品質與組織學習對組織績效之影響-以社會網絡觀點闡 述台灣自行車產業，國立高雄大學亞太工商管理學系碩士論文。
4. 徐昌展，2009，汽車產業中衛結構之網絡研究，國立高雄大學亞太工商管理 學系碩士論文。
5. 楊友仁、夏鑄九，2004，跨界生產網絡的在地化聚集與組織治理模式：以大 蘇州地區資訊電子業台商為例，地理學報，36：23-54。
二、英文部分
1. Akgun A. E., Lynn G. S. and Byrne J. C. (2003). Organizational Learning: A Socio-Cognitive Framework. Human Relations, 56 (7), 839-868.
2. Andrew, V. (1995). Chain of Demand. CMA Magazine, (9), 21.
3. Barker, J. R. (1999). The Discipline of Teamwork. California: SAGE
4. Bleeke , Joel and Ernst D. (1991). The Way to Win in Cross-Border Alliances.
Harvard Business Review, 69 (6), 127-135.
5. Borgatti, S. and Everett M. (1999). Models of Core/Periphery Structures. Social Networks, 375-395.
6. Bowman, Robert J. and David J. Closs (1996). Logistical Management: the Integrated Supply Chain Process, Macmillan, New York, NY.
7. Burt, R. and Celotto, N. (1992). The Network Structure of Management Roles in
58
a Large Manufacturing Firm, Evaluation and Program Planning, 15, 303-326.
8. Burt, R. (1992).Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition.
Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 313.
9. Casciaro, T. and M. Piskorski (2005). Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 167-199.
10. Cartwright. D. and Zander, A. (eds) (1953). Group Dynamics. London:
Tavistock
11. Cooper M. C., Ellram L. M., Gardner J. T. and Hanks A. M. (1997). Meshing Multiple Alliances. Journal of Business Logistics, 18(1), 67-89.
12. Cronin M. A. and Weingart L. R. (2007). Representational Gaps, Information Processing, and Conflict in Functionally Diverse Teams. Academy of
Management Review, 32(3), 761-773.
13. Demsetz, H. (1988). Ch9: The Theory of the Firm Revisited. In Ownership, Control, and the Firm---The Organization of Economic Activity. NY: Basil
Blackwell Inc.
14. Denison, D. Hart, S. and Kahn, J. (1996).From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model. Academy of
Management Journal, 39 (4).
15. Donald, B. J. and David, J. C. (1996). Logistical Management-The Integrated Supply Chain Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 34.
16. Dyer, H.J. (2000). Collaborative Advantage: Winning Through Extended Enterprise Supplier Networks. NY: Oxford University Press.
17. Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Inter-Organizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of
Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
59
18. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-40.
19. Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory, Part II: Exchange Relations and Networks,” in J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr. and B. Anderson (eds.), Sociological Theory in Progress. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
20. French, J. R. P., Jr. and B. H. Raven (1959). The Base of Social Power, in D.
Cartwright (ed.), Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
21. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.
Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
22. Ford, D, Thomas, R. 1995. Omega: Network Perceptions and Network Learning.
In Håkansson, H, Snehota, I (Eds). Developing Relationships in Business Networks. Routledge: London; 221-31.
23. Gereffi, G. and Korzeniewicz, M. (Eds.). (1994). Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. New York: Praeger.
24. Gereffi, G. Humphrey J. and Sturgeon T. (2005).The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy 12 (1), 78-104.
25. Gomes-Casseres B. (1994). Group Versus Group: How Alliance Network Compete. Harvard Business Review, (7-8), 62-74.
26. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
27. Grandori, A. (2001). Neither hierarchy nor identity: Knowledge Governance Mechanisms and The Theory of the Firm, Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 685-692.
28. Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
29. Hakanson, L. (2007). Creating Knowledge: the Power and Logic of Articulation.
60
Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (1), 51-88.
30. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for Competence and Interpartner Learning within International Strategic Alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83–103.
31. Harary, F. and Norman, R.Z. (1953). Graph Theory as a Mathematical Model in Social Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
32. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on
Motivation for Knowledge Sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
33. Hidding, G. and Shireen, M. C. (1998). Anatomy of a Learning Organization:
Turning Knowledge into Capital at Andersen Consulting. Knowledge and Process Management, 5(1), 3-13.
34. Humphery, J. and Schmitz, H. (2002). How Dose Insertion in Global Value Chains after Upgrading in Industry Cluster? Regional Studies 36(9), 17-27.
35. Inkpen, A. C. and Beamish, P. W. (1997). Knowledge, Bargaining Power, and the Instability of International Join Venture. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 177-188.
36. Kale, P., Singh, H. and Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and Protection Asses in Strategic Alliance: Building Relational Capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217-237.
37. Krause Daniel R. (2001). Toward a Measure of Competitive Priorities for Purchasing. Journal of Operations Management, 19, 497-512.
38. Kumar, N., L. K. Scheer and J. B. Steenkamp, (1995)The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes, Journal of Marketing Research,
32 (3), 348-356.
39. Lawler, E. J. and S. B. Bacharach (1987). Comparison of Dependence and Punitive Forms of Power. Social Forces, 66, 446-462.
40. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. (1997). Information Distortion in a
61
Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546-558.
41. Lee, J. N. and Y. G. Kim. (1999). Effect of Partnership Quality on Is
Outsourcing Success: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15 (4), 29-61.
42. Molm, L. D. (1987). Extending Power-Dependence Theory: Power Processes and Negative Outcomes,” in E. J. Lawler and B. Markovsky (eds.), Advance in Group Processes, (4). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
43. Molm L. D. (1990). Structure, Action and Outcomes: The Dynamic Power of Social Exchange. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 427-447.
44. Moreno, J. (1934). Who Shall Survive? New York: National Institute of Mental Health.
45. Newell, A. (1982). The Knowledge Level. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87-127.
46. Nonaka and Takeuchi. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. NewYork:
Oxford University Press.
47. Philippe-Pierre Dornier, Ricardo Ernst, Michel Fender and Panos Kouvelis.
(1998).Global Operations and Logistics. N. Y.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 214-231.
48. Rai, A. Patnayakuni, R. and Seth, N. (2006). Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225-246.
49. Ring, P.S. and Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental Processes of
Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90- 118.
50. Rubin, J. A. and B. R. Brown (1975). The Sociology of Bargaining and Negotiations. New York, NY: Academic Press.
51. Sandefur, R. L. and E.O. Laumann. (1998). A Paradigm for Social Capital.
62
Rationality and Society, 10, 481-501.
52. Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.
53. Scott, J. (2002). Social Networks: Critical Concepts in Sociology New York, Routledge.
54. Seidmann, A. and Sundararajan, A. (1997). The Effects of Task and Information Asymmetry on Business Process Redesign. International Journal of Production Economics, 50(2/3), 117–128.
55. Smith, D. and White, D. R. (1992). Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy: Network Analysis of International Trade 1965-198. Social Forces, 70(4), 857-893.
56. Sturgeon, T. (2002) .Modular Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 451–96.
57. Tan, M. (1994). Establishing Mutual Understanding in Systems Design: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(4), 159-182.
58. Van de Ven, A. (1976). On the Nature, Formation and Maintenance of Relations among Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1(4), 24-36.
59. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Wellman and Barry. (1988) Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance, 19.
61. Yan, A. and Gray, B. (1994). Bargaining Power, Management Control, and Performance in United States-Chinese Join Venture: A Comparative Case Study.
Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 478-517.
三、網絡資料
63
1. 中國金屬包裝行業發展機遇和前景（2011 年 8 月 16 日）。中國商務部。2011 年 4 月 15 日，取自：
http://big5.mofcom.gov.cn/gate/big5/ccn.mofcom.gov.cn/spbg/show.php?id=121 66&ids=
2. 中國金屬包裝行業運行情況概覽（2012 年 3 月 5 日）。中國金屬包裝委員會。
2011 年 4 月 15 日，取自：http://www.bz800.com/news/html/201203/93775.html
64
65
66
67
68
69
70