研究限制

一、欠缺全球總部的管理階層意見

決策自主權的程度與範圍只詢問子公司的經理人或是區域中心的管理幹 部，而未詢問全球總部的管理階層的意見。理想上應該兩種層面都要有相同的答 案，但居於成本及時間上之限制，本研究只詢問子公司負責人及亞太區管理幹 部，此為本研究之限制之一。

二、研究樣本代表性不足

因本研究訪談為亞太區域中心幹部或是子公司經理人，故本研究的樣本皆為 台灣子公司與大陸子公司，忽略其他區域子公司，如用於解釋對其他國家子公司 時，無法類推到其他區域子公司上，可能需要做某些調整，故此為本研究之限制。

參考文獻

一、中文部分

1. 胡英志，2005，多國籍公司對台及對大陸之發展策略研究—以特用化學品之 廠商為例，國立中山大學企業管理學未出版碩士論文。

2. 翁良杰，2003，多國籍企業在大中華區域策略研究：以兩岸子公司間關係為 焦點，中山大學企業管理學系研究所博士論文。

3. 陳克名，2000，在台外商子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究，臺灣大學商學 研究所碩士論文。

4. 陳耿彬，2002，多國籍企業之台灣子公司對母公司赴大陸投資之中介角色，

國立中山大學企業管理學碩士論文。

5. 曾志弘，2001，多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究—以多 國籍企業在台子公司為例，國立中山大學企業管理學博士論文。

6. 費孝通，1985，鄉土中國，北京：生活、讀書、新知三聯書店。

7. 黃光國，1988，「人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲」，中國人的權力遊戲，台 北：巨流圖書公司，7-55。

8. 廖明坤，2002，台商大陸子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究。國立政治大學 企業管理學系博士論文。

9. 鄭惠芳，2004，跨國企業大陸子公司本土化影響因素之研究，國立中山大學 企業管理學碩士論文。

二、英文部分

1. Baliga, B. R. & A. M. Jaeger (1984), Multinational corporations: Control systems and delegationissues. Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2), 25-40.

2. Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal (1986),Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard

Business Review,64.

3. Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. (1990). The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Networ. The Academy of Management Review,15(4), 603-625.

4. Bartlett, C. A. & S. Ghoshal (1989), Managing across borders: The transnational solution, Boston, MA.Harvard Business School Press.

5. Birkinshaw, J. (1998). Corporate entrepreneurship in network organizations:

How subsidiary initiative drives internal market efficiency. Euopean

Management Journal,16(3), 355-365.

6. Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood(1997).An empirical study of development process in foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada and Scotland. Management International

Review, 37, 339-364.

7. Birkinshaw, J. M. & A. J. Morrison (1995). Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations. Journal of International

Business Studies, 26(4), 729-753.

8. Birkinshaw, J. M. (1997), Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations:The characteristics of subsidiary initiative.Strategic Management Journal, 18, 207-229.

9. Birkinshaw, J. M. (2000). Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Clusters. Journal of International Business Studies,31(1), 141-154.

10. Birkinshaw, J. M., and N. Hood (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolutions:

Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy

of Management Review, 23(4),773-795.

11. David M. Brock(2003).Autonomy of Individuals and organizations: Towards a strategy research agenda. International Journal of Business and Economics,2(1), 57-73.

12. Edwards, R., Ahmad, A. and Moss, S. (2002). Subsidiary Autonomy: The case of multinational subsidiaries in Malaysia. Journal of International Business

Studies,33(1), 183-191.

13. Garnier, G. H. (1982). Context and Decision Making Autonomy in the Foreign Affiliates of U.S. Multinational Corporations. Academy of Management

Journal,.25(4), 893-908.

14. Gates, S. R. & W. G. Egelhoff (1986). Centralization in

Headquarters--Subsidiary Relationships. Journal of Business Studies, Summer, 71-92.

15. Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. A. (1988). Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovation by Subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 365-388.

16. Ghoshal, S. & N. Nohria (1989). Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal,10, 323-337

17. Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett C.A. (1990).The multinational corporation as an inter-organizational network.Academy of Management Review,15,603-625 18. Goehle, D. G. (1980). Decision Making in Multinational Corporations. Ann

Arbor, UMI Research Press.

19. Gupta, A. K., Govindarajan, V., & Malhotra A.(1999).Feedback-seeking behavior within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 205-222.

20. Hedlund, G.(1980). The role of foreign subsidiaries in strategy decision making in Swedish multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 1,23-36.

21. Hedlund. G. (1981). Autonomy of subsidiaries and formalization of

Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in Swedish MNCs. In L. Otterbeck(ed.),

The Management of Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in Multinational Corporations, New York, St. Martin’s Press.

22. Jarillo, J.C. and J.I. Martinez(1990). Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal,11,501-512.

23. Nohria, N. & S. Ghoshal (1994). Differentiated Fit and Shared Values:

Alternatives for Managing Headquarters-Subsidiary Relations. Strategic

Management Journal, 15, 491-502.

24. Nohria, N. and C. Garcia-Pont (1991). Global strategic linkage and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer), 105-124.

25. O’Donnell, S. W. (2000). Managing Foreign Subsidiaries: Agents of Headquarters, or an Interdependent Network?. Strategic Management

Journal,21(5), 525-548.

26. Paterson S. L. and D. M. Brock(2002).The development of

subsidiary-management research: review and theoretical analysis. International

Business Review,11(2),139-163.

27. Porter M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior

performance. New York: Free Press.

28. Porter, M.E.(1986). Changing Patterns of International Competition.

California Management Review, winter,9-40.

29. Prahalad, C. K. & Y. L. Doz (1981). An approach to strategic control in MNCs.

Sloan Management Review, 22(4), 5-13.

30. Prahalad, C.K. & Y.L. Doz. (1987).Managing interdependencies across

businesses:The Multinational Mission. New York: The Free Press

31. Roth, K. & A. J. Morrison (1992).Implementing global strategy:Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 715-735.

32. Taggart, J. H. & N. Hood (1999). Determinants of Autonomy in Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries”, European Management Journal, 17(2), 226-236.

33. Taggart, J. H. (1997). Autonomy and procedural justice: A framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1), 51-76.

34. Taggart, J. H.(1998). Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries. Strategic Management

Journal,19(7), 663-681.

35. Vachani, S. (1999). Global diversification’s effect on multinational subsidiaries’

autonomy. Journal of International Business Studies, 8,535-560.

36. Welge, M. K. (1981). The Effective Design of Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in German MNCs. In L.Otterbeck (ed.), The Management of

Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in Multinational Corporations,

Hampshire, U.K., Gower Publishing Co.

37. Young, S. and Tavares, A. T.(2004).Centralization and autonomy: back to the future. International Business Review,13(2),215-237.

38. Young, S., Hood, N. & Hamill, J. (1985). Decision-Making in Foreign-Owned Multinational Subsidiaries in the United Kingdom. Working paper,35, Geneva, International Labour Office.

三、網路資源

1. 高雄塑酯公司

http://kmc.acrylicap.com/

2. 璐彩特公司

http://lucite.com/

3. 亨斯邁公司

http://www.huntsman.com/pu/index.cfm?PageID=2263

4. 汽巴精化公司

http://www.cibasc.com/

您好： 聯絡電話：(07)5252000#4626

指導教授：方至民 博士 曾志弘 博士 研究生：陳麒元 敬上 E-mail：[email protected]

附錄

二、解釋自主權意義：

3. 母公司對於子公司要求授權的行為，採取什麼樣的態度和行為？

¾ 環境：

1. 請簡述目前子公司的環境情況？

（政治、經濟、社會、政策、產業環境，當地同業競爭情況、產業變動程度）

2. 公司環境控制力的大小為何，會受到哪些無法控制的因素影響？

3. 環境影響授權的因素為何？

4. 在環境發現機會或威脅，是否會上報母公司？當要求作改變時，母公司 是否允許？

5. 就你所知，請問您對大陸子公司的看法？簡述大陸子公司的營運狀況？

6. 就你所知，在總部的規劃下，雙方子公司自主權大小為何？

7. 就你所知，台灣跟大陸的環境差異在哪？如何影響子公司的自主程度？

五、未來子公司地位的趨勢？是往授權高的程度發展，亦或是母公司

收回權力

在文檔中 多國籍企業子公司自主權影響因素之研究 (頁 77-86)